No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Grand River Health Care

118 Trenton Road, Chillicothe, MO 64601 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (660) 646-0353 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$68,226 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $68,226 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (81%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2791 N Washington St · (660) 646-2682 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Hy-Vee0.7 mi
1210 Washington St · (660) 646-3638 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
720 Elm St · (660) 339-3014 · Call to confirm hours
Park
300 Mack St · +166607526275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
713 Milwaukee Ave · (660) 646-7233

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%18.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.1%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.0%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication50.5%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table73.9%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.43
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
81.3%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 30.0 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.84 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 81% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1) from abuse on 01/05/26, when the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator forced the resident to remove soiled clothing by physically restraining the resident's arms, hands, and ripping the soiled clothing off while the DON yelled curses and obscenities at the resident. As a result, the resident complained of arm pain and said they hurt me. Multiple, small, light-colored bruises were observed. The resident was transported to the emergency room for evaluation. The facility also failed to provide continued protection when the DON and Administrator were not immediately removed from the facility, per policy, and they continued to provide oversight for all residents until 01/06/26. The facility census was 31.The administrator was notified on 01/08/26 at 1:22 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 01/05/26. The IJ was removed on 01/08/26 as confirmed by surveyor on-site. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, dated 11/28/16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident #2) free from verbal and physical abuse when Nurse Aide (NA) A held resident's arms down and cussed at resident (Resident #2) and when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A yelled at resident (Resident #2) and forced the resident to wear a bi-pap mask (A device that forces oxygenated air through mask that is suctioned against a person's face to provide respiratory support) against the resident's will . The facility census was 26. Review of facility policy, dated 11/2017, showed: -It is the policy of the facility that at each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion. The resident will be free from physical and chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The resident will be protected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, (Resident #1) was free from verbal and physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A grabbed the resident's arm, jerking him/her back into the wheelchair, while yelling and cursing at the resident. The facility census was 27. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy, dated November 2017, showed: -It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion. Additionally, residents will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility. No abuse or harm of any type will be tolerated, and residents and staff will be monitored for protection. The facility will strive to educate staff and other applicable individuals in techniques to protect all parties; -Any owner, licensee, administrator, licensed nurse, employee or volunteer of a nursing home shall not physically, mentally,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) was free from abuse when a staff member forcibly used the resident's own hand to hit himself/herself in the face multiple times. This affected one of four sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility census was 28. Review of the facility provided, Abuse Prohibition Policy dated March 2012 showed: -It is the purpose of this facility to prohibit mistreatment, neglect abuse of resident and misappropriation of resident property. -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury,unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. -All employees of this facility are mandated reporters. -All allegations of abuse, neglect,exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources, will be reported immediately. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 11/12/24 showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicated the resident had severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency. This effected one of four sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility census was 31.Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, dated 11/28/2016 showed: -It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from verbal, mental or physical abuse and corporal punishment; -Residents will be protected from abuse, neglect and harm while they are residing at the facility;-No abuse or harm of any type will be tolerated; -Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish; -Examples of physical abuse include: hitting, scratching, holding someone down, grabbing a resident by arms or legs;-All employees are mandated reporters; -The Nursing Home Administrator or designee will report abuse to the state agency per State and Federal requirements; -All allegations of abuse, will be reported immediately, but no later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one residents (Resident #2) right to be free from physical abuse when Resident #1 hit Resident #2 on the arm on two separate occasions. The facility census was 28.Review of the facility Abuse Policy, undated, showed:- It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion;- The resident will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility;- Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable restriction, threat or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain, or mental pain or deprivation by an individual; - Abuse is any intentional act that causes harm or potential harm to a resident. It can be physical, emotional, sexual, verbal, or financial. Abuse can occur as a single incident or a repeated pattern of behavior;-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assure one resident (Resident #1) was free from misappropriation of his/her property when the resident's narcotic medications were found missing from the facility. The facility census was 26. Review of facility's abuse policy, dated 11/2017, showed: -It is the policy of the facility that at each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include misappropriation of resident property -All employees who have been alleged to commit abuse will be suspended immediately pending investigation. -If allegation is substantiated there is a potential that the employee will be terminated, added to the Employee Disqualification List and not allowed to work in a nursing home, disciplined by their licensing agency, and charged with a crime. Review of facility policy, Scheduled II-V Medications, undated, showed: -Schedule II-V medications may be kept in medication cart lock box, refrigerator, boxes, or double lock box maintained in medication room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the state survey agency and law enforcement, misappropriation of resident property (missing narcotics), when the facility became aware on 3/11/25 that one resident (Resident #1) had one bubble pack card of a narcotic medication, hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325mg (a controlled drug used to relieve severe pain) missing. The facility census was 26. Review of facility abuse and neglect policy, dated 11/2017, showed: -The facility will ensure that any reasonable suspicion of crimes committed against a resident of the facility will be reported to the appropriate Law Enforcement Agency as established by section 6703(b)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. When there is reasonable suspicion that a crime had occurred, then in addition to reporting the allegation of abuse to the state survey agency, the incident must be reported to the local law enforcement. -All reports of suspected crime must be reported immediately reported to local law enforcement to be investigated. The facility will fully…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep a record of the dishwasher chemical tests, label and date all foods, dispose of expired foods, properly store glasses and cups, failed to ensure kitchen was clean and in good repair, and failed to ensure walk-in cooler was in good repair. The facility census was 27. A policy regarding dietary services and food storage was requested but not provided. 1. Continuous observation of the kitchen on 2/24/25 beginning at 9:44 A.M. showed: - Expired 8 oz. Always Save baking cocoa best by date was 6/19/22; - Expired10 lb. Clabber Girl baking powder best by date was 9/2021; -No open date labeled on 1 gallon Kikkoman soy sauce; -.49 oz. Supreme Tradition parsley flakes with no open or best by date; -11 lb. Gold Medal chocolate fudge icing with no open date; -Three boxes of Hyvee 5.85 oz. chocolate pudding with best by date of 7/10/24 and no received date; -Three boxes of Hyvee 5.85 oz. chocolate pudding with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #15's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Independent with eating and transfers; - Diagnoses included: Diabetes mellitus, depression, high blood pressure, schizophrenia ( a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, obstruction of air flow that interferes with normal breathing). Review of the resident's POS, dated 1/25/25 - 2/25/25, showed: - Start date: 3/5/24 - Check and record blood sugar daily; - Start date: 7/22/24 - Humulin R (short acting) insulin per sliding scale. The order did not indicate how often it was to be administered; - Start date: 6/19/24 - Trelegy Ellipta 100-62.5 - 5-25 micrograms (mcg.), inhale one puff daily and rinse mouth after use for COPD. Review of the resident's Nurse medication administration record (MAR) dated February 2025, showed: - Check and record blood sugar daily; - Trelegy Ellipta 100-62.5 - 5-25 mcg., inhale one puff daily and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure they provided a reasonable accommodation of needs when they made residents, some with potential gait instabilities, from entering a dark restroom connected to their room and having to cross the whole restroom to flip the light switch to get the light to illuminate. This affected 11 of 30 rooms. The faciltiy census was 27. 1. Observation on 2/5/25 stating at 2:36 P.M., showed the the restrooms between rooms 201/203, 202/204, 205/207, 206/208, 209, and 210/212 had a shared restroom. Both sides had a light switch. The light switch was located just inside the restroom on the interior wall on both sides. To get to the other light switch the resident would need to pass by the sink, toilet, and get to the other wall with the light switch. If the light was on, both light switches could turn off the light, but if the light were off, only one switch could turn on the light. If the light switch on the side of the resident did not turn on the light, they would need to traverse through the restroom to get to the other side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives when staff did not respond to shower preferences for two of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #2 and Resident #3) and when staff failed to assist Resident #3 to shave per his/her preference. The facility census was 27. The facility did not provide a policy regarding showers or shaving. 1. Review of Resident #3's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/20/24 showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Independent with showers, dressing, personal hygiene and transfers; - Always continent of bowel and bladder; - Diagnoses included anxiety and schizophrenia ( a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of the resident's care plan, revised 1/28/25 showed: - The resident preferred to take showers at night. He/she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure residents (Resident #1, #4, #6, #15) had timely access to their personal funds on the weekend. This affected four of the 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 27. Review of facility policy Guidelines for Maintaining the Resident Trust Fund Account, revised, 8/20/19, showed: - The resident and/or legal representative, upon request will have reasonable access to the resident's personal funds during normal business office hours; - If funds are requested for weekend use, funds should be requested during normal business hours on Friday or if outside normal business/banking hours, facility staff may contact a member of facility management for access; 1. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff), dated 12/2/24, showed: - Cognition Intact-(understands and makes all needs known) - Diagnosis: hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (chronic disease when body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures in the shower room, fill, sand, and paint drywall patches, maintain facility furniture in good repair, ensure all call lights were functional, flooring was clean and in good repair and replace wallpaper as needed. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 27. A policy regarding Maintenance and Upkeep of Facility was requested but provided. Review of the Maintenance Work Log at the nurses' station showed: - A binder containing repair requests entered in by staff for the maintenance department to complete; - Entry: room [ROOM NUMBER] hole in wall needs filled, marked down as fixed; - Entry: Shower room drain won't go down (not fixed) 2/18/25; Observation on 2/24/25 showed: - 10:17 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] misaligned coat cabinet near door misaligned will not shut properly, door needs repainting in several places…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and updated a care plan consistent with resident's specific conditions and needs which affected two of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #11, #26). The facility census was 27. A policy regarding care plans was requested but not provided. 1. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/2/24, showed: - Cognition severely impaired; - Total assist of all Activities of Daily Living; Mobility, Transfers and Hygiene - Diagnosis: Anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, seizure disorder, schizophrenia (mental disorder with a disruption in thought processes), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (mental health condition from witnessing a traumatic event); Review of the resident's care plan revised, 2/12/2025, showed: - Resident diagnosed with PTSD. - No identified triggers are listed and no interventions for staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided services that met professional standards of quality of care when staff failed to have medications available for two of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #6, #15) and failed to clarify a sliding scale insulin order for Resident #15. The facility census was 27. The facility did not provide a policy for ordering medications. 1. Review of Resident #15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/15/24, showed: - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Independent with eating and transfers; - Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, depression, high blood pressure, Schizophrenia ( a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, obstruction of air flow that interferes with normal breathing). Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 1/25/25 - 2/25/25 showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had fresh water at bedside that was easily accessible to the residents. This affected three of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #15, #22 and #26). The facility census was 27. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hydration, showed staff were directed to do the following: - Each resident is supplied with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration; - Fresh water is distributed each shift, pitchers and glasses are within reach of the resident and residents who are unable to pour and drink independently will be given assistance by the staff. 1. Review of Resident #15's care plan, revised 11/30/24 showed; - The resident had a diagnosis of constipation; - Will follow diet as ordered by the primary care physician; - Will maintain adequate hydration daily. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/15/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #22's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Independent with eating dressing, personal hygiene and transfers; - Diagnoses included psychotic disorder ( a mental illness that causes a person to lose touch with reality), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, obstruction of air flow that interferes with normal breathing), and diabetes mellitus. Review of the resident's POS, dated 1/25/25 - 2/25/25, showed; - Start date: 9/27/23 - O2 at 2L/NC (Liters per Nasal Cannula) with ambulation, none required at rest for acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of oxygen to the tissues); - Start date: 8/13/23 - Ipratropium-albuterol solution for nebulization 0.5 mg. -3 mg./3 ml four times a day for shortness of air. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 1/28/25, showed: - The resident had a diagnosis of COPD and required oxygen during the day; - Had nebulizer treatments as ordered. Review of the resident's MAR, dated February, 2025, showed: - O2 at 2L/NC with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made five medication errors out of 26 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 19.23%, which affected four of the 12 sampled residents, ( Resident #2, #22, #15 and #9). The facility census was 27. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication, Administration Guidelines, showed staff were directed to do the following: - It is the purpose of this facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies; - Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which an authorized person, in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts, gives a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological to a resident; - The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard expired medications, and biologicals stored within the medication room and the medication cart, failed to date an opened vial of Influenza vaccine, and failed to ensure resident's cigarettes and personal money was not stored in the medication cart. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The facility census was 27. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines, showed: - It is the purpose of this facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies; - Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which an authorized person, in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts, gives a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological to a resident; - The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container, verifying it with the physician's orders. giving the individual dose to the proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the required two step tuberculosis (TB, a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty in breathing) screening test was administered upon hire for seven random sampled, newly hired employees, and failed to use proper handwashing in between tasks, and failed to use enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for resident #79, which affected one of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 27. Review of the facility's undated Tuberculosis (TB) Control policy showed: -Initial examination: Provide a tuberculin skin test to all employees during pre-employment procedures. -If the initial skin-test result is 0-9mm, a second test should be given at least one week and no more than three weeks after the first test. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions to Infection Guidance, showed: - To prevent broader transmission of multidrug-resistance organisms (MDRO)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse when Resident #12 threatened harm to Resident #9. The facility census was 27. Review of the facility's undated Abuse Prohibition Protocol Policy, showed: - It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion - Additionally, residents will be protected from abuse, neglect and harm while they are residing at the facility; - No abuse or harm of any type will be tolerated, and residents and staff will be monitored for protection; - The objective of the abuse policy is to comply with the seven step approach to abuse and neglect detection and prevention. The abuse policy will be reviewed on an annual basis or more frequently and will be integrated into the facility Quality Assurance and performance Improvement (QAPI)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #8) when staff failed to notify the physician of a resident's change of condition in a timely manner. The facility census was 27. A policy regarding physician notification was requested but not provided. 1. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 1/8/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent on a wheelchair for mobility; -Diagnoses included: Diabetes, high blood pressure, dementia, anxiety, and depression. Review of nursing progress notes, dated 2/20/25-2/24/25, showed: -No documentation regarding the resident's upper respiratory condition; -No documentation regarding contacting the resident's physician or guardian of changes. Observation on 2/24/25 at 2:24 P.M. showed: -The resident sitting in the common area with other residents by the TV; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of potential physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, to officials in accordance with State law, including the Survey Agency for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 28 residents. Review of the facility provided, Abuse Prohibition Policy dated March 2012 showed: -It is the purpose of this facility to prohibit mistreatment, neglect abuse of resident and misappropriation of resident property; -All employees of this facility are mandated reporters; -All allegations of abuse, neglect,exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources, will be reported immediately. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 11/12/24 showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficits; -Understands others and able to make self understood; -Physical behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), of three sampled residents, was free from the use of physical restraint when staff members used their bodies to wrap their arms around the resident to entrap the resident's arms down to his/her side, not allowing movement from the resident, while the nurse administered an intramuscular (IM) injection to the resident for aggressive behaviors towards staff. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility policy Behavioral Interventions Catastrophic Reactions (an overreaction or inappropriate behavior associated with a resident who has dementia (a progressive condition that causes a decline in thinking, remembering, and reasoning, that interferes with daily life,)) from the Special Care Unit Manual, Section 6, dated April 2006 showed staff should do the following: -Allow a resident who is experiencing a catastrophic reaction to move freely, except when acting violently to another person. Don't restrain a resident. -Do not restrain the resident or use physical force. Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate behavioral health interventions for one resident (Residents #1 ) who exhibited behaviors that escalated to a catastrophic reaction, culminating in the use of an antipsychotic (previously known as major tranquilizers: are a class of medication primarily used to manage psychosis: a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality.)medication injection. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility provided policy Behavioral Interventions, dated April 2006 showed: -Catastrophic reaction is the over reactive or inappropriate behavior associated with the resident. This behavior occurs when the resident misunderstands or cannot cope with a distressing physical or environmental situation. A catastrophic reaction can occur when a resident becomes overwhelmed. -Angry and agitated behaviors are part of a brain syndrome and are not deliberate -Do not overwhelm a resident. Usually a calm, private and reassuring show of support will help manage a difficult situation. -Always try to speak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure one dietary employee washed his/her hands after touching the lid to the trash can several times. This practice potentially affected the 26 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 26 residents. Review of the Handwashing Policy dated May 2015, showed: -If using gloves, remove gloves; -Roll down paper towels (some facilities may have self-dispensing paper towels); -Turn on water and run until warm; -Wet hands and forearms with warm water; -Lather hands with antiseptic soap; -Wash hands, giving particular attention to the areas between fingers, around cuticles, and under fingernails; -Wash forearms as well; -Rinse thoroughly with warm water, beginning at the top of the forearm; -Wipe hands dry with clean paper towel; -Turn off water with paper towel and dispose of paper towel; -Trash cans should either have a foot controlled flip top lid or no lid to prevent re-contamination of the hands. Observation on 4/20/23 at 9:00 A.M. showed: -Cook A hand shredded carrots for the pork fried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat three of 13 sampled residents (Resident #4, #15 and #21) with dignity and respect when staff did not knock on the resident's door, wait for resident's response before entering, and announcing themselves. The facility census was 26. Review of the undated Resident Rights Policy showed Social Service Department will review Resident Right and Health Care Directives on admission with all residents and annually thereafter, both orally and in writing in a language the resident understands of his rights and rules/regulations including grooming, resident conduct, and responsibilities during facility stay. All residents will be informed of resident rights, regardless of physical, emotional or mental impairment. The rights included treating residents with privacy and respect. 1. Review of Resident #21's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed; - Cognitive skills intact; - Required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and dressing; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to deliver Saturday mail to three of (Resident #21, #3, and #1) 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 26. Review of the undated Resident Rights Policy showed: -Social Service Department will review Resident Right and Health Care Directives on admission with all residents annually thereafter, both orally and in writing in a language the resident understands of his rights and rules/regulations including grooming, resident conduct, and responsibilities during facility stay. All residents will be informed of resident rights, regardless of physical, emotional or mental impairment. RIGHTS: -Resident [NAME] of Rights -Renew annually Resident Rights -To be fully informed -Participate in their own care -Communicate freely 1. Review of Resident #21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/27/23, showed: -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (is a mandatory tool used to screen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care, which affected three of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #4, #6 and #21). The facility census was 26. Review of the facility's undated policy for perineal care, showed, in part: - The purpose is to clean the perineum and to prevent infection and odor; - Assist the resident to lay on their side and flex their knees; - Use one gloved hand to stabilize and separate the perineal folds, with the other hand, wash from front to back; - Rinse and pat dry; - Use a new wash cloth and wash around the anus. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 2/4/23 showed: - Cognitive skills for daily decision making, moderately impaired; - Required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of the pharmacist's recommendations for two of 12 sampled residents, (Resident # 4 and #13). The facility census was 26. The facility did not provide a policy for consultant pharmacy services and/or gradual dose reductions. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/4/23 showed: - Cognitive skills for daily decision making, moderately impaired; - Required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use; - Lower extremity impaired on both sides; - Always incontinent of bowel and bladder; - Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF, accumulation of fluid in the lungs and other areas of the body), depression, psychotic disorder ( severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions). and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made five medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 20%. This affected four residents sampled for medication administration (Residents #2, #24, #14, and #1). The facility census was 26. Review of the Cyclosprine eye drops manufacturer's guidelines, dated November 2022 showed: - How to use: Tilt your head back, look upward, and pull down the lower eyelid to make a pouch. Hold the dropper directly over your eye and place one drop into the pouch. Look downward, gently close your eyes, and place one finger at the corner of your eye (near the nose). Apply gentle pressure for 1 to 2 minutes before opening your eyes. This will prevent the medication from draining out. Try not to blink or rub your eye. If directed to use this medication in both eyes, repeat these steps for your other eye. Review of facility's undated Installation of Eye Medication Policy showed: - It's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility staff failed to prevent a significant medication error, when staff did not follow standards of practice when staff failed to prime the insulin pens with two units prior to administration and failed to allow the insulin pen to remain in the injection site for at least 6 seconds for three of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #14 and #24) and failed to transcribe a physician order into the resident's electronic chart and into the Medication Administration Record (a record used to document medications given to a resident (MAR), failed to document doses of insulin were given and failed to follow a physician's order as directed for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #1). The facility census was 26. Review of the facility's undated subcutaneous injection policy showed: - Medications that are injected slowly will absorb more effectively and cause less discomfort. - Expel air from syringe - Inject medication slowly and remove needle quickly. Review of the manufactures instructions for Novolog FlexPen showed: - Before each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was not left at a residents bedside which affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #17), failed log temperatures on the medication storage room refrigerator and prevent ice buildup, failed to refrain from using the medication storage refrigerator to store staff drinks, failed to destroy medication for a resident who had expired and failed to ensure both staff signed the narcotic count book at shift change. The facility census was 26. Review of the facility's undated Medications, Self-Administration, Self-Storage, Leave at Bedside policy showed: - The resident has a right to self-administer medication unless the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is unsafe for an individual resident. - If a resident expresses a desire to self-administer medication, the interdisciplinary team must assess the resident's cognitive, physical and visual ability to carry out this responsibility. The mental status and any psychiatric diagnosis must be taken into account. - For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices during medication pass when staff did not wash or sanitize their hands between residents which affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2), change out their gloves after coming in contact with dirty surfaces which affected one resident(Resident #6), did not sanitize the port of the feeding tube for one resident (Resident #6), and did not place supplies on a clean surface, which affected four resident (Resident #1, #2, #14 and #24) and when staff threw wound supplies directly on the floor which affected one sampled resident (Resident #21). The facility census was 26. Review of the facility's undated Standard and Transmission Based Precautions policy showed standard precautions will be used in the care of all residents regardless of their diagnosis, or suspected confirmed infection status. Standard precautions presume all blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions, non-intact skin and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement, follow and monitor an antibiotic stewardship program when staff did not monitor infections and antibiotics on a monthly control log, trend the infections and assess to determine if the correct antibiotic was used for the correct length of time for two of 12 sampled residents (#1 and #11). The facility census was 26. Review of the facilities undated Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy showed: -Facility is implementing an antibiotic stewardship program that will help prevent unnecessary use of antibiotics. -The Adverse reaction of using unnecessary antibiotics can result in adverse drug reactions or interactions, the development of Clostridium difficile infections the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms, antibiotic failure, increased mortality and greatly increased costs. -This program includes tool, policies, and procedures to guide nursing home staff toward more responsible and effective use of antibiotics. - The Goal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assure they followed their policy when they failed to document the residents' choice of code status in such a way to be readily accessible to staff in the event of an emergency. This affected one sampled resident (Residents #178). The facility census was 26. Review of the undated Advance Directive Policy showed: -Upon admission of a resident to the facility, the social services designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate an advance directive. -Upon admission of a resident, the social services designee will inquire of the resident; and/or his/her family members, about the existence of any written advance directives. -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record under the advance directive tab. -Staff will be in-serviced annually to ensure that they remain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible parties and the reasons for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood. The notice should include the effective date of discharge or transfer; the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and electronic mail), telephone number of the entity which receives requests and information on how to obtain the appeal form and assistance in completing and submitting it; the name, address (mailing and electronic mail) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and for residents with a mental disorder or related disabilities, the mailing, electronic mail (email) address and telephone number of the agency for protection and advocacy for individuals with mental disorders established under the Protection and Advocacy for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of accidents and injuries when transferring one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #4) during the use of a gait belt (a safety device and mobility aid used to provide assistance during transfers, ambulation or repositioning) transfer and when staff failed to report, document and investigate when staff lowered Resident #4 to the floor. The facility census was 26. Review of the facility's undated gait belt policy, showed, in part: - The purpose is to provide better control and balance while assisting residents with ambulation and transfer; - Apply belt to resident's waist, tighten to fit snugly with the buckle at the side; - Face the resident; - Bend your knees and place your hands around the gait belt on each side of the resident's waist; - Bring resident to a standing position while straightening your knees. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to assess placement of a gastrostomy tube (g-tube (a tube placed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall as a means of feeding them when they are unable to eat) using the current standard of practice, failed to follow proper infection control practices when staff did not change out their gloves after coming in contact with dirty surfaces and failed to ensure correct procedures were followed when medications were administered through the g-tube. This affected one resident (Resident #6) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 26. Review of the facility's undated Standard and Transmission Based Precautions policy showed standard precautions will be used in the care of all residents regardless of their diagnosis, or suspected confirmed infection status. Standard precautions presume all blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions, non-intact skin and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents. Staff will be trained in various aspects of standard precautions to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-02-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances of the resident council members concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility and failed to communicate back with the resident council regarding their concerns as reported by 15 of 15 residents, who participated in a group interview. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Residents Rights dated 4/06 showed: -It is the purpose of this facility to meet the Federal and State Mandate in respects to resident rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility. A facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident. 1. Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 12/1/20 showed the residents at the meeting stated that the attitudes of the nursing staff is poor, nursing will not talk to them. No change in the concern. Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 1/5/21, two residents stated that when staff answered their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-02-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' grievances were fully addressed and failed to maintain complete documentation of grievances received, steps taken to resolve the grievance, notification of the residents of the results of the grievance and follow up with the residents to ensure the problem/concern was resolved for two sampled residents (Resident #6 and #32). The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Grievance Protocol dated 4/06 showed: -The purpose of the Grievance/Complaint Report and Grievance Log is to provide a written record of each resident and family concern and to insure proper follow-up through the appropriate discipline. -The Social Service Director (SSD) is responsible for the program, although the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the proper implementation of the program.; -The SSD informs the Administrator of each incident; -Guidelines: any member of the Social Services staff can complete the Grievance Complaint Report. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provided necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for one of 21 sampled residents Resident #25. Staff also failed to respond timely when one resident, Resident #36 had a change in condition. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Condition Change, Resident (Observing, Recording and Reporting) dated March 2015 included the following: - Purpose: To observe, record, and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented; - After changes in physical or mental function, monitor for the following (included): o Observe personality changes; o Observe for alterations in consciousness; o Observe for incontinence; o Observe for generalized weakness; o Observe for speech disorder; o Observe for gait, posture or balance disorder, take vital signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-02-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to monitor weights, notify the physician of the Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations and of weight loss for one resident (Resident #16) of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Dietitian Consultant Reports dated 5/15 showed: -The Dietitian will complete a consultation report prior to completing an exit interview with the Administrator and Dining Services Manager or will fax or email the completed report the next working day; -The consultant report must reflect what was accomplished in the visit which may include, but is not limited to: assessment and monitoring of nutritional needs of the resident; -Recommendations should be completed within five working days of the monthly visit; -A response to the consultant recommendations is to be completed by the dining services manager(DM), in conjunction with the Director of Nursing (DON) 1. Review of Resident #16's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection when they did not change gloves and wash their hands between dirty and clean tasks which affected two of 21 sampled residents (Resident #25 and #27) and failed to follow the facility policy for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) when staff failed to wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for a resident (Resident #36) in the Observation Unit for COVID-19 and failed to wear a facemask while preparing food in the dietary department. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Gloves, dated 3/15 showed: -Wear gloves when it can be reasonably anticipated that hands will be in contact with mucous membranes, non-intact skin, any moist body substance (blood, urine, feces, wound drainage, oral secretions, sputum, vomitus or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician and guardian immediately when the resident (Resident #36) had a significant change in condition. The resident had a history of being hospitalized while living at the facility. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy titled Condition Change, Resident (Observing, Recording and Reporting; includes Fall or Injury), dated March 2015 included the following: - Purpose: To observe, record, and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented; - After all resident falls, injuries or changes in physical or mental function, monitor for the following (included): o Observe personality changes; o Observe for alterations in consciousness; o Observe for incontinence; o Observe for generalized weakness; o Observe for speech disorder, o Observe for gait, posture or balance disorder, take vital signs and include temperature; - Have someone stay with the resident while the nurse is calling the attending physician, if necessary. If you are unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided transfer or discharge notification to residents and their responsible party and the reasons for the transfer/discharge in writing in a language they understood. This affected three of 18 sampled residents (Residents #1, #23 and #36). The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Discharge/Transfer of Resident dated 3/15 showed: -Discharge means to leave the facility without plans or intention to return (i.e., discharge to go home, a lower level of care or another long-term care facility).; -Transfer means to leave the facility with plans or intention to return (i.e., transfer to an acute care facility for appropriate care); -Purpose: to provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for the aftercare of the resident: -Needed are: the resident medical record, discharge or transfer order; discharge against medical advice form if necessary, transfer for, discharge summary and post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and the resident's family/legal representative of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer/discharge to the hospital for one of 21 sampled residents (Residents #1). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the undated facility policy for Bed Hold showed: -The facility will notify all residents, and/or their representative of the bed hold guidelines. This notification shall be given: 1. Upon admission to the facility, 2. At the time of transfer to the hospital or leave, and 3. At the time of non-covered therapeutic leave. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #36), who had a history of multiple re-hospitalizations, kept a follow up appointment according to discharge orders from his/her most recent hospitalization. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 9/30/20 showed the following: - admission date 6/7/16; - Moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was hospitalized on the following dates: - 4/13/20 for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ecoli) grows from the urine culture - 5/22/20- acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; - 9/20/20- Pneumonia - 11/1/20- UTI, ESBL - 12/14/20- for a Urinary Tract Infection - 1/23/21- for UTI with sepsis Review of the discharge summary from the hospital on 1/23/21 showed the resident had an appointment set up for 2/3/21 at 9:30 A.M. with a gastroenterologist (physicians who are trained to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff identified the cause of an injury and put measures in place for one resident (Resident #27), when the resident developed dark, bruised appearing areas to both outer ankles. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 12/2/20 showed: -Alert and oriented and able to make decisions and answer questions appropriately; -Extensive assistance of two staff members with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) ; -Independent with locomotion in a wheelchair; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -No falls or skin impairment; -Diagnoses of hypertension (HTN), diabetes, anxiety, schizophrenia (a long-term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation.) Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing weekly. This affected three residents (Residents #10, #27, #18) and had the potential to affect all residents who require oxygen while in the dining room. The facility also failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen therapy for two residents (Resident #10 and #27). Facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, Cleaning Guidelines - Oxygen Equipment, dated March 2015, showed: -All oxygen equipment are changed every seven days when heated humidification is used, and monthly when unheated humidification is used. -All concentrator outside surfaces are to be cleaned weekly by nursing personnel, and marked with date an initials; -Tubing, masks, and cannula's used with oxygen therapy should be replaced monthly and as needed (PRN), and marked with date and initials. Review of facility policy, Physician Orders, dated March 2015, showed: -Oxygen orders: specify the rate of flow, route, and rationale. 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assure two of 21 sampled residents (Resident #15 and #18), who used psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions (GDRs) in an effort to discontinue these drugs. The facility also failed to assure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days. The facility's census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Drug Review dated 3/15 showed: -All medications given to reach resident will be reviewed on a monthly basis in order to; review drug interactions, insure adherence to stop orders, insure accuracy in administration and evaluate medications appropriate to diagnosis; -The pharmacist reviews all federal indicators, and a monthly report is filled out to show any problem areas. The report lists any problems noted, the date and signature of the reporter; -Medications should not show unnecessary or excessive use and should have a diagnosis to support them; -Problems identified shall be addressed according to need in consultation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications with a less than 5% medications error rate. Facility staff made three medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error resulting in a 12.0% medication error rate. This affected two of 21 sampled residents (Residents #6 and #18 ). The facility census was 37. Review of the facility policy for Medication Administration dated 3/15 showed: -Medications are given to benefit a resident's health as ordered by the physician. 1. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 10/20/20 showed; -Alert and oriented and able to make decisions; -Independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); -Diagnoses of heart failure, hypertension and diabetes. Review of the physician orders (POS) for February 2021 showed: -Flonase (is used to relieve symptoms of rhinitis such as sneezing and a runny, stuffy, or itchy nose and itchy, watery eyes caused by hay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff dated insulins when opened for resident use, failed to discard loose pills, and failed to remove expired medications from the medication cart and the medication storage room. The facility census was 37. Review of facility policy, Storage of Medications, dated March 2015, showed: -No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines. Review of Resident #22's physician orders, dated February 2021, showed: -Pazeo drops 0.7% (antihistamine, treats itching and redness in eyes due to allergies); instill one drop in both eyes daily as needed for allergies; order date 01/22/19. Review of Resident #14's physician orders, dated February 2021, showed: -Novolog (a fast-acting insulin to lower blood sugar levels) 10 units subcutaneous (under the skin) three times daily; order date 06/20/20. Review of Resident #14's medication administration review, dated January 8th…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets the resident nutritional and special dietary needs. This affected two sampled residents Residents #4 and #15. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Food Preparation and Distribution, dated May 2015, included the following: - The Dining Services Department will prepare foods by methods that are safe and sanitary while conserving nutritive value as well as enhancing flavor; - Foods are prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 1/7/21 showed: - Moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 2/1/21 the resident said the food was not very good, period. It was too tough, bland and just plain did not taste right. Review of the Lunch menu for 2/2/21 showed smothered Steak with onions, mashed potatoes, green peas, dinner roll,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff did not keep a clean kitchen. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled Holed and Expiration Policy on Condiments, Dry Spices, etc. included the following: - Spices lose their potency of flavor over time due to dry and excessive holding, causing a quality issue. They are tossed a year after their delivery date, which is standard for spices. Spices never truly expire, but may become outdated and eventually low-quality. Spices are kept in sealed containers and stored in a clean and dry environment; - Leftovers need to be labeled and dated with current date and their expiration date. When putting leftovers in containers, they cannot be left out for no more than two hours at room temperature. By that point bacteria may grow which ma cause foodborne illness. Leftover become outdated and spoiled in three days, which is our holding period. Observation on 2/01/21 beginning at 10:18 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's policies did not addressed foods being brought in to residents by family and other visitors. During an interview on 2/2/21 at 2:34 P.M. the Administrator and Director of Operations said: - The facility did not have an actual policy to address food being brought to residents by family and other visitors. The facility had not been allowing any food to be brought in from family or other visitors due to COVID-19 (a contagious respiratory disease thought to spread mainly from person to person through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks).

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide therapy services for two residents (Residents #15, #4) when the facility placed the resident on a pureed diet due to choking and did not obtain an evaluation from a speech therapist and did not provide physical therapy after Resident #4 requested it. The facility census was 37. The facility did not provide a policy regarding therapy services. 1. Review of Resident #15 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument complete by staff, dated 1/29/21 showed: -Alert and oriented with difficulty making decisions; -Limited assistance of one staff member for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and supervision of one staff member for eating; -Has swallowing difficulties with coughing or choking during meals during meals or when swallowing medications; -Received no speech therapy. Review of the residents Physician Orders (POS) for February 2021 showed an order for pureed diet. Review of the medical record showed the resident was receiving speech therapy services in July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the dishwasher in the kitchen in safe operating condition. The facility census was 37. 1. Observation on 2/2/21 at 9:29 A.M. showed the dishwasher in the kitchen was not in working condition. During an interview on 2/2/21 at 10:15 A.M. the Dietary Manager said: - The dishwasher broke on the morning of 1/ 30/21. She heard clanking and the spring that helps the door open broke and the hose was not dispensing sanitizer; - The dishwasher repair man was supposed to come on 2/3/21; - The dishwasher broke down about every four months, the facility needed a new one; - All the residents were being served on disposable dishware because of the broken dishwasher, everything else was being washed in the three compartment sink. Observation on 2/3/21 at 2:43 P.M. showed the dishwasher was still not in operating condition. During an interview on 2/3/21 at 2:43 P.M. the Dietary Manager said the repair man came and would be back on 2/12/21 with the parts needed for the repair. During an interview on 2/3/21 at 2:46 P.M. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public when they failed to ensure a shower drain was fastened in the shower and ensure the parking lot was free of large pot holes, potentially causing a tripping hazard. The facility census was 37. The facility did not provide a policy regarding maintenance of the facility. 1. Observation of the shower off of the 300 hall showed a drain cover in the shower was not fastened to the drain line enabling the cover to be moved from the drain line uncovering approximately a two-inch hole. 2. Observation on 2/1/21 at 10:00 A.M. throughout the survey showed seven potholes in the parking lot of various sizes. The sizes ranged from a grapefruit to beach ball size that were approximately three inches deep. 3. During an interview on 2/3/21 at 2:46 P.M. the Administrator said: - The facility did not currently have maintenance staff and had not had one since January 2021, a corporate maintenance staff was coming to the facility to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$68,226 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $41,615 — penalty dated 2026-01-09
  • $26,611 — penalty dated 2024-12-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-08 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/01/1998
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/01/1998
LAUHOFF, KENTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/25/2022
CRANE, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/1998
DRAKE, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/25/2022
STUTTS, CHARLOTTEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/1998
N & R OF CHILLICOTHE, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/1998

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$1.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$680K
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 98%Medicare 1%Other / private 1%

About 98% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $680K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$247per resident / day
operating cost
$7,499per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$197per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265480. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next