Pin Oaks Living Center
1525 West Monroe, Mexico, MO 65265 · For profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (573) 581-7261 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,650 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-18)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.0% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.8% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.9% | 17.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 32.2% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.9% | 26.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.4% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.4%CMS range 43.4–60.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.4–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 75.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 4.6–14.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 81.6 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for surgical wound care for one resident (Resident #11), of nine sampled residents. The facility failed to change the resident's wound vacuum assisted closure (vac) dressing (a specialized sealed foam bandage connected to a portable pump that applies gentle, constant suction to the wound) biweekly per the physician's order. As a result, the wound vac sponge adhered to the wound bed and the sternum (breastbone) requiring surgery for urgent wound debridement (the process of removing dead or damaged tissue from a wound) and omental flap mobilization and skin grafting (a reconstructive surgery technique used to cover large, complex or infected tissue defects, particularly on the chest wall using fatty tissue from the abdomen) for final wound closure. The resident required an extended hospital stay and required a behavioral health consult after the resident made statements of wanting to end his/her life due to his/her current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of four residents (Resident #2, #3, #4 and #1) in a review of 10 sampled residents to answer call lights and check and change residents in a timely manner. Resident #2, normally continent of bowel and bladder, and requiring staff assistance to use the bathroom, turned on his/her call light and requested staff assist him/her out of bed as he/she needed to use the bathroom. Staff did not respond for three hours, and the resident was incontinent of bladder and bowel. The resident laid in urine and feces. The resident said staff not responding timely to his/her needs made him/her very upset and his/her feelings were hurt when staff treated him/her this way, and his/her skin was irritated and burned from being left soiled. Resident #4 said he/she would become incontinent while waiting for staff assistance and that made him/her feel ashamed and like a child. The facility census was 89.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of five sampled residents, was free from misappropriation of medications when Registered Nurse (RN) A administered gabapentin (used to treat seizures and nerve pain) instead of the scheduled hydrocodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication used for moderate to severe pain) to the resident. RN A documented he/she administered hydrocodone-acetaminophen on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and narcotic log, but RN A administered a gabapentin, not hydrocodone-acetaminophen as ordered. The facility census was 87. On 06/16/26 at 1:50 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 05/20/26. On 05/20/26, the Director of Nursing (DON) became aware RN A misappropriated Resident #1's hydrocodone-acetaminophen. Upon discovery, the DON and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B interviewed RN A regarding administering gabapentin but documenting he/she administered hydrocodone-acetaminophen. The DON terminated RN A's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the Resident Council, concerning issues of resident care and quality of life in the facility, and failed to provide the resident council with responses and actions taken regarding their concerns. The facility census was 89.During an interview on 1/12/26 at 10:00 A.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding Resident Council meetings and facility response to the meetings, but she would expect for the facility to follow the regulatory requirements. Review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 11/17/25, showed the following:-Seven residents attended the meeting;-Resident Council President: Resident #10;-The form directed staff to include old business and resolutions and new business and plan of action;-The residents said call light wait times were long;-The residents were waiting lengthy time periods to be changed and long wait times for showers;-The residents complained about the quality of the food and said the chicken was over cooked;-The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when staff failed to complete an assessment and documentation or obtain physician orders for treatment related to a fall with injury for one additional sampled resident, (Resident #10) in a review of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Review of the undated facility policy, Resident Condition Change, showed the following:-Purpose: To observe, record and report any change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented;-After a resident falls, injuries or changes in physical or mental function, monitor the following: -a. Observe for lacerations. If present, clean and apply dry, sterile dressing or dressing of physician's choice. Note size, depth and amount of bleeding or drainage;-b. Observe for swelling and discoloration, if present, chart size, site, amount and color;-d. Observe and inquire if resident has headache or pain;-k. Observe for gait, posture or balance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the Director of Nursing's (DONs) job description, the facility failed to ensure the DON served full time as DON and did not serve as charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of over 60 residents. This failure had the potential to affect the completion of nursing administration duties, including (but not limited to) staff training, quality improvement activities, and incident management for all 71 facility residents. The facility census is 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's DON Job description, dated May 2006 provided by the facility, revealed The DON must be in facility, or involved in other work-related activities a minimum of eight hours per day, Monday through Friday. ln addition, routine second shift, third shift, and weekend on-site inspections are to be maintained. During observations during the survey from Monday, 11/11/24 through Thursday 11/14/24, the DON/Infection Preventionist (DON/IP) was observed working on Unit 1 as a floor nurse/charge nurse. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 1:30 PM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of R49's undated Face Sheet, found in the EMR under the Summary tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included depression, history of hallucinations, and anxiety. Review of R49's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/03/24 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated R49 did not exhibit any behaviors or signs and symptoms of depression during the assessment reference period. Review of R49's physicians Orders dated 11/14/24 and found in the EMR under the Orders tab, revealed an order dated 05/32/22, for Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) 1 milligrams (mg)by mouth every evening for anxiety and an order dated 06/08/23 for Sertraline (an antidepressant medication) 100 mg by mouth every night for depression. Review of R49's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one medication cart observed out of five medications carts was locked when left unattended. The facility further failed to ensure 18 cards of controlled medications were stored in a double lock manner. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure one medication room observed out of three medications rooms was locked when left unattended. This had the potential for residents, staff, and visitors to access the medications for possible misappropriation. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the undated Medications, Storage of policy indicated that 1. All medications for residents must be stored at or near the nurse's station in a locked cabinet, a locked medication room, or one or more locked mobile medication carts. 2. All mobile medication carts must be under visual control of the staff at all times when not stored safely and securely. Carts must be either in a locked room or otherwise made immobile, and 15. An unattended medication cart must remain locked at all times. In the event…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the failed to ensure infection control was maintained during medication administration, failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated to ensure potential respiratory infection was prevented, and failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during wound care. This affected four of 24 (Residents (R) 39, R53, R48, and R64) residents. This had the potential for a potential transmission of infection. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 11/13/24 at 8:03 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2 poured one ferrous sulfate tablet 324 milligrams (mg) from the pill bottle directly into her bare hand. LPN2 then administered the medication to R39. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 8:23 AM, LPN2 stated that she normally poured a pill directly from the medicine bottle into the medicine cup prior to administration. LPN2 stated that this pill tends to fly away, so she poured it into her hand. LPN2 stated that she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R)375) observed out of a total sample of 24 residents had an assessment and an order for self-administration of medications. These failures placed R375 at risk for medication errors, overdose, or misappropriation of medications. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines, dated 02/07/13 revealed, Remain in the room while the resident takes the medication. Review of the facility policy titled, Medications, Self-Administration, Self-Storage, Leave At Bedside dated 02/07/13 revealed, The resident has a right to self-administer medication unless the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is unsafe for an individual resident . Self-administration and self-storage of over-the-counter medications: The resident's ability to self-administer over-the-counter medications and store them at the bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure code status/advance directives would be honored when the facility failed to obtain a physician's signature or resident/responsible party signature for code status or advance directive paperwork for two residents (R375 and R48) of five residents reviewed for code status out of a total sample of 24 residents. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Policy, revealed, Guidelines for CPR: NOTE: Do not initiate CPR if a valid DNR order is in place. Review of the facility's undated Advance Directive policy revealed it did not address code status and provision of or withholding CPR. 1. Review of R375's Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, anxiety disorder, and depression. The Face Sheet documented, Directive Copy on File: Notes-Do Not Resuscitate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly notify residents of potential non-coverage and beneficiary financial liability for two of three residents (Resident (R)225 and R227) reviewed for beneficiary notification out of a total sample of 24 residents. This had the potential to place undue financial liability on residents without their knowledge. The facility census was 71. Findings include: The facility did not provide a policy related to Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN). 1. Review of R225's undated Face Sheet, located in the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R225 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/11/24. Review of a document titled Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for R225 revealed a NOMNC dated 09/03/24 indicating a coverage end date of 09/14/24. There was no ABN with a benefits end date of 09/14/24 when R225's coverage for skilled nursing was due to end and R225 remained in the facility. Review of R225's Progress Notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) R25) out of three residents reviewed for abuse was free from resident to resident verbal abuse. R25 was verbally abused by R49. This failure created the potential for further resident to resident abuse and for R25 to experience psychosocial harm related to the abuse. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion; and examples include scolding, ignoring, ridiculing, or cursing a resident. 1. Review of R25's undated Face Sheet found in the Electronic Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of allegations of abuse related to three (Residents (R) R22, R25 and R49) out of a total of three residents reviewed for abuse. R22 reported an allegation of staff to resident abuse and R25 was verbally abused by another resident (R49) and neither incident was timely reported to the State Agency (SA), Ombudsman or local law enforcement. This failure created the potential for these and other residents to experience potential further abuse. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment, or involuntary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed related to an incident of resident-to-resident verbal abuse involving two (Residents (R )25 and R49) out of a total of three residents reviewed for abuse. This failure created the potential for R25 and other residents to experience further abuse. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy read, in pertinent part, Investigation: It is the policy of his facility that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated. 1. Review of R25's Face Sheet, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Summary tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure three residents (R9, R48, and R53) of a total of 24 residents reviewed had comprehensive care plans in place to address all of their needs. R9 did not have a care plan with interventions to prevent the resident from experiencing another coffee burn. R48 did not have a care plan in place to address his behaviors or the administration of his psychotropic medications and R53 did not have a care plan in place to address the administration of her oxygen. This failure created the potential for comprehensive care to not be provided for the residents. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of R53's Face Sheet, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Summary tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The document indicated the resident's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a final discharge summary was completed upon discharge for one resident (Resident (R) 17) of three residents reviewed for discharge out of a total sample of 24 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to a lack of continuity of care and lack of necessary treatment and services. The facility census was 71. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Discharge/Transfer Policy dated March 2015, revealed, Complete discharge summary and post discharge plan of care form. Have resident and/or representative or person responsible for care sign discharge summary and post discharge care form. Place the original form in the record. Review of R17's Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: sepsis, palliative care, morbid (severe) obesity, schizophrenia, peripheral vascular disease, pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement their scheduled activities programs for residents. The facility also failed to ensure one (Resident (R)9) of two residents reviewed for activities was provided with a consistent activity program to meet their needs. The resident was not offered activities based on assessment of her activity preferences. This failure created the potential for the resident to experience isolation related to lack of participation in facility activities. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's Activity, Volunteer and Recreational Services Policy dated 03/2012 read, in pertinent part, The facility provides for an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. 1. Review of the facility's activity calendars for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, review of Broda chair instructions, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R9) of two residents reviewed for pressure sores was provided with adequate care and treatment to prevent skin breakdown. This failure created the potential for the resident to experience further skin breakdown. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Wound Care and Treatment Policy read, in pertinent part, It is the purpose of this facility to prevent and treat all wounds; and There must be a specific order for the treatment; and The care plan should reflect the current status of the wound and appropriate goals and approaches. Review of the facility's undated Instructions for Use When Using a Broda Chair document, provided directly to the survey team, read, Are Additional Cushions Recommended or Required? Not necessarily. Our proprietary Comfort Tension Seating system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from potential accident and hazards during smoking for one of one (Resident (R) 67) reviewed for safe environment out of a sample of 24 residents. This had the potential to place residents at risk of injury from a potential fire. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the Oxygen Therapy Safety Guidelines from the National Institute of Health revealed the following: -Keep oxygen cylinders away from heat sources; -Keep oxygen delivery systems at least 5 feet from any heat source; -Oxygen supports combustion. No smoking is permitted around any oxygen delivery devices in the hospital or home environment. Review of the facility policy (undated) titled, Smoking-Resident revealed Anyone who provides smoking supervision to residents shall be advised of any restrictions/concerns and the plan of care related to smoking. Review of a document titled Dependent Resident Smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive dialysis services were provided for one resident (R22) out of a total of one resident reviewed for dialysis. There were no orders in place related to the care and maintenance of the resident's intravenous (IV) dialysis catheter. This failure created the potential for R22 to receive incomplete and inconsistent care of her dialysis catheter. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Dialysis, Care of a Resident Receiving Policy read, in pertinent part, Care of a Subclavian or Femoral Vein Catheter: Treatment for cleaning as ordered by the physician .Nurses to maintain dressing to access site at all times. Site to be checked every shift and dressing reapplied or reinforced as needed. Review of R22's undated Face Sheet, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Summary tab, revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (R9 and R53) of a total of nine residents reviewed for accidents was appropriately assessed for the use of side rails on their beds. The facility further failed to ensure both residents had an informed consent for the use of rails on their beds. This failure created the potential for the residents to be injured related to use of potentially unnecessary side rails installed and in use on their beds. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Bed Rails Policy read, in pertinent part, Prior to use of bed rails the facility should complete the Matrix Bed Rail Observation including the following: 1. Observation Detail 2. Clinical Assessment 3. Alternatives attempted prior to bed rail implementation 4. Bed Rail Details 5. Assessment of potential entrapment zones 6. Review of the risks and benefits with the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physical safety of bed rails for two (Residents (R)9 and R53) of a total of nine residents reviewed for accidents. Bed rails on both residents' beds were observed to be loose. This failure created the potential for the residents to be injured by improperly applied and unmaintained bed rails. A total of 24 residents were reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Bed Rails Policy read, in pertinent part, Staff will conduct regular inspections of all bedframes, mattresses, and bed rails, to identify areas of possible entrapment. 1. Review of R9's undated Resident Face Sheet, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Summary tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The document indicated the resident's diagnoses included dementia and repeated falls. Review of R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of property when 40 tablets of oxycodone/acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) and five tablets of gabapentin (used to treat nerve pain) were determined missing for one resident (Resident #1), when in the possession of facility staff. A sample of seven residents was selected for review. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Protocol, undated, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility that reports of misappropriation of property are promptly investigated; -Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent; -The staff will complete an active search of missing items including documentation of the investigation, and interview with staff members having contact with the resident during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic counts were completed to ensure any missing doses could be readily detected, failed to label medications, and failed to store medications in a safe and effective manner. Licensed staff failed to complete on-coming and off-going controlled drug counts to verify the correct count of narcotics for one resident (Resident #1). Licensed staff also failed to follow the facility policy when accepting medications that were brought from home for the resident to ensure the medications were examined and positively identified by the pharmacist and approved for the resident's use. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility policy, Medications Scheduled II-V (drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to manufacture them have been classified into categories based upon the drugs acceptable use and abuse or dependency potential), undated, showed the following: -To provide medication for residents as prescribed by facility medication personnel and to comply with State and Federal guidelines regarding these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated three residents (Residents #7, #8 and #9), in a review of ten sampled residents, with dignity and respect when they refused to provide assistance and verbalized rude and disrespectful comments to the residents. The facility census was 71. Review of the facility undated policy Resident's Rights showed the following: -Long-term care residents have a right to care which maintains or enhances the quality of life; -Residents should be treated with consideration and respect, with full recognition of their dignity and individuality. Review of the undated facility admission packet showed the following: -As a nursing home resident, you have the right to privacy and respect; -You shall be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of your dignity and individuality; -It is the intent of the facility to promote and ensure that highest standards of conduct and reliability by its employees and consultants to in turn produce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain exhaust vents, lighting, heating/ventilation units, walls, ceilings, and flooring in good repair and free of a buildup of debris. The facility census was 67. Observation and interview on 2/21/23 at 9:34 A.M. in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] showed the brown wall paint was marred with exposed drywall behind the bed closest to the room door. A large patch of drywall compound was visible in the sink vanity area next to the mirror. Maintenance Staff C said the old soap dispenser had been removed and relocated. The area needed to be finished and painted. Observation on 2/21/23 at 9:42 A.M. in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the brown wall paint was marred behind the bed closest to the door. Observation on 2/21/23 at 9:47 A.M. in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed a buildup of debris on the exhaust fan cover in the restroom. Observation on 2/21/23 at 9:50 A.M., in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the yellow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene for three residents (Resident #9, #32, and #370), who required assistance to perform their activities of daily living, in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, Bath (Shower), showed the following: -The purpose was to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness; -Wash face, upper extremities and body, lower extremities and feet, perineal area, and shampoo hair; -Dress resident, comb and style hair. (The facility's policy did not identify when staff were to bathe a resident.) Review of the facility's undated policy, Shaving the Resident, showed to remove facial hair and improve the resident's appearance and morale. (The facility's policy did not identify when staff were to shave a resident.) 1. Review of Resident #9's care plan, dated 10/4/22, showed the following: -The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer three residents (Residents #4, #53, and #62), in a review of 18 sampled residents; failed to utilize a gait belt when repositioning two residents (Residents #6 and #62); and failed to safely transport one resident (Resident #4) in a wheelchair. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy for wheelchair use showed footrests should be lowered and the resident's feet placed on them if used. The resident's feet and legs should be placed in good body alignment. Review of an undated facility policy for gait belt use showed the following: -Purpose: To provide better control and balance while assisting resident with ambulation and transfer. -Resident transfers: -Assist resident to a sitting position; -Apply belt to resident's waist; tighten to fit snugly with the buckle at the side; -Face the resident; -Bend your knees and place your hands around the gait belt on each side of the resident's waist; -Bring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement respiratory and oxygen interventions and monitoring and maintain continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP; machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) equipment according to the facility's policy for four residents (Resident #1, #4, #9 and #24), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, Cleaning Guidelines-Oxygen Equipment, showed tubing, masks, and cannulas used with oxygen therapy should be replaced monthly and as needed (PRN), and marked with date and initials. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, undated, showed the following: -A reserve oxygen tank should be available to provide continuity of care; -Label reusable humidifiers with date and time opened; -Change humidifier and tubing per cleaning guidelines; -At regular intervals, check and clean oxygen equipment, masks, tubing and cannulas; -At regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement sanitary practices and conditions within the dietary department to prevent the potential for contamination of food during storage, preparation, and distribution. The facility census was 67. Observation on 02/21/23 of the noon meal preparation and service showed the following: -At 9:22 A.M., the Dietary Manager and Dietary Aide B prepared food for the noon meal. Both staff had hair hanging out of the sides of their hairnets; -At 10:18 A.M., the Dietary Manager helped prepare the lunch meal, and did not have the top of his/her hair covered with a hairnet; -At 10:22 A.M., the Dietary Manager made cornbread and the sides and top of his/her hair were not covered with a hairnet; -At 11:33 A.M., the Dietary Manager cut corn bread and the sides and top of his/her hair was not covered with a hairnet; -At 11:34 A.M., Dietary Aide B made drinks for the noon meal and the sides of his/her hair were not in the hairnet; -At 11:57 A.M., Dietary Aide B helped serve lunch plates and the sides of his/her hair were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands and changed their gloves after each direct resident contact and when indicated by facility policy during personal care for four residents (Residents #21, #24, #30, and #44), in a review of 18 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #3). The facility failed to ensure sanitary practices when handling wound care supplies during and after wound care for one resident (Resident #120), and failed to ensure proper infection control practices were utilized for respiratory care supplies for two residents (Residents #4 and #370). The facility failed to ensure all procedures were implemented to address prevention, development, and transmission of Tuberculosis (TB) as directed by facility policy. The facility failed to ensure Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST; a small injection in the top layer of skin in the forearm that contains purified protein derivative, PPD) were completed and documented as directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for two residents (Residents #4 and #62), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of facility's undated call light policy showed the following: -Purpose: To respond promptly to resident's call for assistance; -When providing care to residents, be sure to position the call light conveniently for the resident's use; -Be sure all call lights are placed on the bed at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. 1. Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), orthostatic hypotension (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing up from sitting or lying position), depression, hallucinations (an experience involving the apparent perception of something not present), muscle weakness, and unspecified visual loss. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate one resident's (Resident #41's) wheelchair as a restraint, in a review of 18 sampled residents. The resident's wheelchair was positioned so the resident's legs were in front of him/her (horizontal with the floor). Staff documented the resident had poor safety awareness and impulsive behavior, and frequently attempted to get out of his/her wheelchair. The facility census was 67. Review of undated facility policy, Physical Restraints, showed the following: -Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. -Purpose: -To restrict movement to protect the resident during treatment and diagnostic procedures; -To prevent the resident from injuring himself/herself or others; -To improve the resident's mobility and independent function; -To treat the resident's medical symptoms -Guidelines: -Assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one resident (Resident #4), in a review of 18 sampled residents. Staff failed to administer three doses of ordered medication and to obtain laboratory testing as ordered following the resident's return from the hospital. The facility census was 67. Review of the undated facility policy, Physician Orders, showed the following: -Current lists of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident to avoid confusion and errors; -Physician orders must be reviewed and renewed. 1. Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included hypokalemia (a blood level that is below normal in potassium, which can result in fatigue, muscle cramps, and abnormal heart rhythms). Review of the resident's progress note, dated 2/1/23 at 2:40 A.M., showed the following: -The resident arrived back to facility from the hospital emergency room; -Abnormal lab was potassium of 2.9 (normal blood potassium level is 3.6 to 5.2 millimoles per liter); -Additional instructions from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #120), in a review of 18 sampled residents, received necessary care/treatments to prevent and/or heal pressure ulcers. Staff failed to ensure the resident, who had a pressure ulcer on his/her left heel, had heel protectors on while he/she was in bed. The facility census was 67. Review of facility's undated policy, Pressure Ulcer Care and Prevention, showed the following: -The purpose was to prevent and treat further breakdown of pressure ulcers; -The nurse was responsible for carrying out the treatment as ordered by the attending physician and for implementing measures to prevent pressure ulcers; -Staff should use heel protectors if needed. 1. Review of Resident #120's Braden skin assessment for pressure ulcer risk (an assessment tool for evaluation pressure ulcer risk), dated 2/9/23, showed he/she was at high risk for developing pressure ulcers. Review of the resident's wound documentation, dated 2/9/23 at 6:00 P.M., showed the resident had a 1 centimeter (cm) by 0.4 cm pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide proper care to a urinary catheter (a tube inserted in to the bladder to excrete urine out of the body) for one resident (Resident #120), in a review of 18 sampled residents, by failing to keep the catheter drainage bag and catheter tubing from touching the floor. The facility identified two residents with a urinary catheter. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, Catheter/Emptying a Urinary Drainage Bag, showed to keep the drainage bag and tubing off of the floor at all times to prevent contamination and damage. 1. Review of Resident #120's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment to be completed by facility staff, dated 8/22/22, showed he/she had a urinary catheter. Review of the resident's physician's orders, dated 2/9/23, showed the resident had a urinary catheter. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/10/23, showed the resident's diagnoses included history of urinary tract infections (UTI). (The resident's care plan did not identify the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement trauma informed care for one resident (Resident #307), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The resident had a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder with a history suicidal ideations. The facility census was 67. Review of Resident #307's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) II (evaluation on a resident who demonstrates increased behavioral, psychiatric, or mood-related symptoms), dated 1/30/21, showed the following: -The resident was admitted in 1993 in a hospital with suicidal gesture, cut wrists, inpatient for a month; -The resident's parent passed away from brain aneurysm (weakness in a blood vessel in the brain that can leak or rupture, causing life-threatening bleeding) from the motor vehicle accident when the resident was 14 or l5 years old; -The resident was molested by his/her step parent as a child; -Diagnoses of bipolar disorder (brain disorder that causes changes in a person's mood, energy, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the resident council concerning resident care in the facility; and failed to provide the resident council with responses, actions and rationale taken regarding their concerns. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Council, dated March 2012, showed the following: -The resident population will elect a resident council annually in the facility. Monthly meetings will be held with minutes of the meetings documented. Recommendations for changes by the council will be given to the administrator who will evaluate the recommendations. The resident council serves as a liaison between the employees, residents and others who interface with the facility; -Concerns and needs are addressed as voiced by members of the council; -All department leaders are encouraged to attend the meeting for problem resolution. 2. Review of the facility Resident Council Minutes, dated 5/23/19, showed the following: -Eight residents, including Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the floors and walls in good repair, and failed to maintain comfortable temperatures in the facility. The census was 76. 1. Observation on 8/6/19 at 3:34 P.M. showed black marls on the bathroom floor and around the toilet in the bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The soap dispenser on the wall by the sink had been removed leaving holes in the wall from where it had been attached. Observation on 8/6/19 at 10:45 A.M. showed the wall behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was marred with multiple areas of chipped and missing paint. Observations on from 8/6/19 to 08/09/19 showed the following: -Multiple areas of chipped paint on the wall behind bed 1 in room [ROOM NUMBER]; -Multiple areas of chipped paint on the wall behind bed 2 in room [ROOM NUMBER]; -Multiple areas of chipped paint on the wall behind bed 2 in room [ROOM NUMBER]; -Multiple areas of chipped paint on the wall behind bed 1 and 2 in room [ROOM NUMBER]; -Multiple areas of chipped paint on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice and physician orders for three residents (Residents #11, #31, and #54), in a review of 22 sampled residents. The facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #54) with honey thickened (liquids thickened to honey consistency) water in his/her room; failed to ensure oxygen administration was set at prescribed level as physician ordered for three residents (Residents #54, #31, and #11). The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility policy Physician Orders, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident to avoid confusion and errors; -Orders must be signed by the physician and dated when such order was signed; -Physician orders must be reviewed and renewed; -Oxygen orders: Specify the rate of flow, route, and rationale (i.e., 2-3 liters/minute per nasal cannula as needed (PRN) for shortness of breath); -PRN medications:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided six residents (Residents #11, #28, #47, #54, #55, and #65), in a review of 22 sampled residents, and two additional residents (Residents #8 and #66), who were unable to perform their own activities of daily living, the necessary care and services to maintain good personal and oral hygiene. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Purpose: to cleanse the perineum and to prevent infection and odor; -Female perineal care: Put on disposable gloves. Wet washcloth and make a mitt with it. Apply soap lightly, use one gloved hand to stabilize and separate the labia. With the other hand, wash from front to back, rinse and pat dry; -Male perineal care: Put on disposable gloves. Wet washcloth and make a mitt with it. Apply soap lightly, wash pubis and penis. If uncircumcised, pull back foreskin of penis and wash. Carefully dry and return foreskin to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oversight to prevent one additional resident (Resident #61) from wandering outside the facility in a wheelchair. The resident left the facility through an unlocked and unalarmed door. The facility failed to safely transfer three residents (Residents #24, #54 and #65), in a review of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility policy Elopement-Missing Resident from the Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, showed the guidelines discussed a resident missing, who to notify, thorough search, notifying law enforcement, and when located, to assess for injuries. The policy did not address assessing residents for elopement/wandering risk and prevention measures. 2. Review of the facility's [NAME] 3000 Arjo (a standing and raising aide used for transferring residents) instructions for stand-up lift, dated August 2013, showed the following: -A mobile raising aid for raising to a standing position and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs for seven residents (Residents #11, #17, #24, #31, #33, #54, and #65), in a review of 22 sampled residents, and three additional residents (Residents #8, #38, and #100). The facility census was 76. 1. During interview on 8/9/19 at 2:30 P.M., the director of nursing said the facility had no policy regarding facility staffing. 2. During interview with the facility's resident council on 8/6/19/19 at 1:24 P.M. showed the following: -Residents #33 said he/she has had to wait 30 to 40 minutes for staff to answer his/her call light and doesn't feel there are enough staff to get the showers done. He/she feels all three shifts need more help; -Residents #100 said he/she had to wait up to an hour for staff assistance; -Resident #11 said staff come to see what he/she wants when they answer his/her call light, but staff do not return from going to get help. He/she has had to relieve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served food at an appetizing temperature. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility policy, Food Temperatures, dated May 2015, showed hot food should be at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) when served to the resident. 2. During interview on 8/6/19 at 1:37 P.M., Resident #5 said the food served was always cold. The dietary staff brought a cart of trays to the dining room (located by the 400 and 500 hall) for each meal. Staff did not get those trays served for over 15 to 20 minutes. When staff finally got around to passing out the meal trays, the food was cold. 3. Observation on 8/7/19 at 1:14 P.M. of the test tray, obtained after staff served the last resident in the 400/500 hall dining room, showed the temperature of the ground chicken was 92 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature of the pureed carrots was 94 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature of the fried chicken was 112 degrees Fahrenheit, and the regular consistency carrots were 92 degrees Fahrenheit. The food was cool to taste.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to offer residents a daily bedtime snack. The census was 76. During group interview on 8/6/19 at 1:24 P.M., the residents said the following: -Resident #2 said he/she had to get bedtime snacks at the nurses station. Staff do not bring bedtime snacks to the residents; -Resident #5 said staff bring a bowl of snacks to the nurses station but they do not normally bring the snacks to the residents' rooms. He/she would like a snack at night; -Resident #4 said staff will eventually bring a snack if he/she asks for it. Observation on 8/7/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed a blue bowl sat on the nurses station containing various snacks. Observation on 8/8/19 at 5:30 A.M., showed a blue bowl sat on the nurses station containing various snacks. During interview on 8/9/19 at 8:22 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said the dietary staff bring out a snack bowl in the evening and staff are to offer the residents a snack and document the intake or refusal in the computer. During interview on 8/9/19 at 8:29 A.M., the dietary manager said bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands after each direct resident contact and when indicated by professional standards of practice during personal care for four residents (Residents #28, #37, #47 and #54), in a review of 22 sampled residents Facility staff failed to transport clean linens in such a way as to prevent cross-contamination. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Gloves, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Wear gloves when it can be reasonably anticipated that hands will be in contact with mucous membranes, non-intact skin, any moist body substances (blood, urine, feces, wound drainage, oral secretions, sputum, vomitus, or items/surfaces soiled with these substances) and/or persons with a rash. Gloves must be changed between residents and between contacts with different body sites of the same resident; -REMEMBER: Gloves are not a cure-all. They should reduce the likelihood of contaminating the hands, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, maintain, and update a plan of care consistent with residents' specific conditions, needs, and risks based on their comprehensive assessment for one resident (Resident #65), in a of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility policy Care Plan Comprehensive, dated March 2015, showed the following: -The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff); Assessment of each resident is ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition; -The resident's comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment; -The interdisciplinary care plan team is responsible for periodic review and updating of care plans when a significant change in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-11-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to routinely post daily staffing sheets and accurately post the number of hours worked by the staff who provided care. The facility census was 89.During an email correspondence dated 1/13/26 12:12 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have a facility policy specific to posted staffing, but she would expect the facility to follow the regulatory requirements for posted staffing. 1. Observation on 1/7/26 at 3:00 P.M. showed a plastic sleeve attached to a wall at the entrance of the facility. Facility staff verified this was where posted staffing was displayed for the public to view. The plastic sleeve was empty. 2. Review of the posted daily staffing sheet provided by the Director of Nurses (DON), dated 1/1/26, showed the following:-Registered Nurse (RN): 2 worked day shift and hours worked were 24;-RN: 1 worked night shift and hours worked were 12;-Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN): 1 worked day shift and hours worked were 12;-LPN: 1 worked night shift and hours worked were 12;-Certified Medication Technician (CMT): 2 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation to show a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC; from CMS-10123) and a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) (form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two residents (Residents #3 and #9), who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare A services. The facility census was 67. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The NOMNC is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-02-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge to the resident and/or the resident representative when five residents (Residents #4, #9, #21, #62, and #370) in a review of eighteen sampled residents were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 67. During interview on 2/28/23 at 2:00 P.M., the administrator said there was no specific policy for written notices of transfer/discharge to the residents and/or the resident representatives, but was aware they were required. 1. Review of Resident #21's face sheet showed the resident was his/her own responsible party. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 2/3/23 at 4:45 P.M , showed the resident was sent to the emergency room for treatment of visual disturbances. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 2/4/23 at 4:28 A.M., showed the resident was discharged from the emergency room to return back to the facility. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold with required information to the resident and/or resident representative when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital for five residents (Residents #4, #9, #21, #62, and #370), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's undated policy, Bed Hold Guidelines, showed the following: -This facility will notify all residents and/or their representative of the bed hold guidelines; -The notification shall be given on admission to the facility, at the time of transfer to the hospital and at the time of non-covered therapeutic leave; -If the resident or resident representative wants to hold the bed, a signed authorization must be obtained with each discharge. 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet showed the resident was his/her own responsible party. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 2/3/23 at 4:45 P.M., showed the resident was sent to the emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-08-09 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prominently post the results of the most recent standard survey, any deficiencies resulting from subsequent complaint investigations, and any plans of correction in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives. The facility failed to post a notice of the availability of such reports in areas that are prominent and accessible to the public. The facility also failed to have reports from any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations during the three preceding years, and any corresponding plans of correction available for individuals to review upon request. The facility census was 76. Observations on 8/6/19 through 8/7/19 showed a black notebook on the small round table by the front door to the facility. Survey Result was printed in approximately 0.5 inch lettering on the spine of the notebook. The spine of the notebook faced toward the wall. There was no posted information to show residents and family where the survey results were located. The notebook contained the results of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and resident representatives of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for three residents (Residents #47, #59, and #68), in a review of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 76. 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, Bed Hold Policy Notification, showed staff will give this policy to the resident or resident representative at the time of admission, at the time of transfer to the hospital, and at the time of non-covered therapeutic leave. 2. Review of Resident #47's census report showed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 4/20/19. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility provided the resident or the resident's representative with written notice which specified the duration of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer on 4/20/19. 3. Review of Resident #59's census report showed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 7/8/19. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,650 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $26,650 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-11 for 34 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINCOLN, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 09/01/2016 |
| LINCOLN, JUDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 09/01/2016 |
| LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265481. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.