Warrenton Manor
65 State Hwy Aa, Wright City, MO 63390 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (636) 456-8700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.6% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.5% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.7% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.0% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.6% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 63.5% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.2%CMS range 27.6–62.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.4–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 89.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to update the plan of care with changes in care needs for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 91.1. Review of the facility's Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, undated, showed the facility Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive plan of care for each resident. 2. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 04/08/26, showed staff assessed the resident with moderate cognitive impairment, did not exhibit behaviors and did not reject care.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 03/02/26, showed the care plan did not contain direction for staff when resident rejects care. Review of the residents' progress notes showed staff documented:-On 02/26/2026 the resident refused to allow staff to change his/her clothing;-On 03/24/2026 the resident refused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure three residents (Resident #8, #9, and #10) out of three sampled residents, who are dependent for activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene. The facility census was 91.1.Review of the policies provided by the facility showed the facility did not provide a shower/bathing policy or grooming/hygiene policy. 2. Review of Resident #8's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 04/06/26, showed staff assessed the resident as: cognitively intact, does not reject care, and is dependent for showers, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene;Review of the care plan, dated 03/05/26, showed staff assessed the resident is unable to bathe self-related to weakness and poor mobility and wishes two showers a week preferably in the mornings. Review showed the resident required one staff for bathing. At times he/she does not want to get up for showers and will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of care when staff left narcotic pain medication unattended at one resident's (Resident #5) bedside and accessible to the resident's roommate. The facility census was 90.1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 02/07/13, showed after staff administer a medication to a resident, staff are to remain in the resident's room while the resident takes the medication. 2. Review of Resident #5's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 04/11/26, showed the resident's cognition intact, has almost constant pain, and received a scheduled pain medication in the last five days. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 02/28/26, showed the resident resists care which includes taking medications. Review of the resident's physician order sheet, dated January 2026 and March 2026, showed an order for Percocet (A schedule II opioid narcotic prescribed to treat moderate to severe pain) 10-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet every four hours. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents remained free of significant medication errors when staff administered Resident #3's medication Metformin (medication used to treat type two diabetes by lowering blood sugar levels) and Metorprolol Tartrate (a beta-blocker used to treat high blood pressure, chest pain and heart failure) to Resident #1. The facility census was 91.1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 02/07/13, showed medications are given to benefit a resident's health as ordered by the physician. Introduce yourself, call resident by name, and check picture identification in medication book. Review showed the policy did not contain documentation to direct staff on the five rights of medication administration.2. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 04/08/26, showed staff assessed the resident with moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the facility's Medication Error Documentation form, dated 11/02/25, showed Certified Medication Technician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when staff failed to apply the appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during care for one resident (Resident #3) of three sampled residents with wounds and ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was in proximity of the resident room for three of three sampled residents with wounds (Resident #3, #2 and #11). The facility census was 91.1. Review of the facility's EBP to Infection Control Guidance, dated March 2024, showed:-EBP should be implemented for the period of the resident's stay or until wounds have resolved or indwelling medical devices have been removed;-EBP should be used with residents with an indwelling medical device including the following: urinary catheter, feeding tube, and tracheostomy (tube inserted into the neck for breathing);-EBP should be used with residents with a wound regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to report two separate allegations of resident-to-resident physical abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the two-hour required timeframe. The facility's census was 89.1. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 11/28/2016, showed physical abuse includes, but is not limited to, hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse (ALL abuse allegations are to be reported within two hours), or if an event, results in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete shiftily controlled drug counts with two staff members per facility policy to prevent misappropriation and assure correct controlled drug counts. The facility census was 92.The administrator was notified on 11/25/25 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 10/25/25 when the administrator implemented new policies and procedures to ensure Certified Medication Technician (CMT) and nurses counted narcotics at the beginning and end of each shift with two staff members and documented on the Narcotic Count Form. Staff were in-serviced on 10/25/25 regarding counting narcotics at the beginning and end of each shift with two staff members and documented on the Narcotic Count Form.1. Review of the facility's Narcotic Count policy, dated undated, showed staff are directed as follows:-The purpose is to complete a physical inventory of narcotics at each shift change to identify discrepancies. -One Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), or CMT going off duty AND one RN, LPN, or CMT coming on duty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when facility staff failed change and/or store oxygen tubing in a manner to prevent the spread of bacteria for two residents (Resident #14 and #15) out of three sampled residents. Facility staff failed to implement the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy when they did not educate, or alert staff of residents who required EBP, and failed to place appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in close proximity for two residents (Resident #26, and #187) of two sampled residents. Facility staff failed to maintain proper infection control practices for two residents (Resident #26 and #187) out of two sampled residents with catheters. Facility staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene, and glove changes during wound care for one resident (Resident #26) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity by not properly covering urinary catheter bags for two residents ( Resident #55, and Resident #187) out of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated April 2006, showed: -Residents have a right to dignified existence; -Resients have a right to privacy and Respect. 2. Review of Resident #55's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment too, dated 02/05/25, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Observation on 03/18/25 at 2:09 P.M., showed the resident in his/her room with the door open. His/Her catheter bag secured to the right leg below the knee containing urine in the a clear plastic bag. No privacy cover was in place for the catheter bag. Observation on 03/19/25 at 8:31 A.M , showed the resident in his/her wheelchair in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for five residents (Resident #9, #15, #20, #34 and #53) out of twelve sampled residents. The facility's census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Care Plan Comprehensive policy dated March, 2015 showed: -The interdisciplinary care plan team (IDT) with input from the resident, family, and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool; -Assessment of each resident is ongoing and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition. 2. Review of Resident #9's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide services to meet professional standards when staff failed to document and obtain orders for hospice services on two (Resident #53 and #187) of two sampled residents who receive hospice services, to obtain orders for an colostomy for one (Resident #187) out of one sampled residents, failed to document weekly skin assessments for three (Resident #15, #26, and #39) of four sampled residents. Facility failed to follow physician Liodcain Patch orders for one (Resident #11) of one resident. Faciliy failed to administer insulin appropriately for one (Resident #26) of four sampled residents. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed the facility did not provide a hospice policy. 2. Review of #53's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/10/25, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Severely cognitively impaired; -On hospice; -Diagnosis of dementia.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to provide assistance to maintain personal hygiene and grooming for eight (Resident #11, #34, #46, #51, #53, #55, #63, and #71) out of nine sampled dependent residents . The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Bath (Shower) policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose of bathing was to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness. Review of the facility's Shaving the Resident policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose of shaving was to remove facial hair and improve the resident's appearance and morale. Review of the facility's Nails, Care of (Fingers and Toes) policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose was to provide cleanliness, prevent the spread of infection. 2. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 02/19/25, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -Required moderate assistance with showering; -Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to support independence and interaction in the memory care unit. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed the facility did not provide a policy for Activities. 2. Observation on 03/18/25 at 9:40 A.M., showed the Activity Calendar, dated March 2025, hung in the hallway of the memory care unit. The calendar showed the following: -03/18/25: 9:00 A.M., Catholic Services, 10:00 A.M., musical bingo and 2:00 P.M., horse racing; -03/19/25: 10:00 A.M., Hair dresser and 2:00 P.M., country store; -03/20/25: 10:00 A.M., Movie and snacks and 1:30 P.M., Bingo; -03/20/25: 9:00 A.M., Communion and 1:30 P.M., Music and groove. Observation on 03/18/25 at 09:30 A.M., showed a religious service held in the entranceway of the facility not located in the memory care unit. Residents from the memory care unit were not present and did not have service on the unit. Observation on 03/18/25 at 2:18 P.M., showed a group of residents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide safe mechanical transfer for two residents (Resident #30, and #55). Facility staff failed to provided safe wheelchair propulsion for two residents(Resident #13, and #30). Facility staff failed to safely administer medication to one resident (Resident #51). Facility staff failed to lock medication carts when not in use and failed to store hazardous materials in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's mechanical lift policy, dated March 2015, showed staff are directed to follow the manufacturer's instructions when using any type of mechanical lift and does not direct staff on holding onto the resident while suspended in the air. Review of the mechanical lift operating manual, dated 10/18/18, showed: -It is recommended two staff perform mechanical lift transfers; -Staff are to use the straps or handles on the side and the back of the sling to guide the patient's hips as far back as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure four Nurse Aide's ((NA) NA H, NA I, NA J and NA K) out of fourteen sampled staff, completed the nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. The census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for NA qualifications. 2. Review of Newly Hired NA Audit Tool, showed NA H's hire date as 05/06/24. Review showed the NA's file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program. 3. Review of Newly Hired NA Audit Tool, showed NA I's hire date as 10/17/24. Review showed the NA's file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program. 4. Review of Newly Hired NA Audit Tool, showed NA J's hire date as 09/06/24. Review showed the NA's file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide training program. 5. Review of Newly Hired NA Audit Tool, showed NA K's hire date as 09/06/24. Review showed the NA's file did not contain documentation the NA completed a nurse aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post required nurse staffing information to include the facility name, resident census, total number of staff and total actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift on a daily basis. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for Staffing and Scheduling Postings. 2. Observation on 03/18/25 at 10:49 A.M., showed staff did not post required nurse staffing information to include the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift. 3. Observation on 03/19/25 at 9:40 A.M., showed staff did not post required nurse staffing information to include the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift. 4. Observation on 03/20/25 at 10:23 A.M., showed staff did not post required nurse staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to store medication in a safe and effective manor in one medication storage room, and three medication storage carts. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Medication, Storage Of policy, dated March 2015, showed: -No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing Pharmacy of destroyed in accordance with established guidelines; -Drugs must be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, or carts. 2. Observation on 03/19/25 at 2:47 P.M., showed the 100 hall medication storage room contained: -One intravenous (IV) administration set with an expiration date of 02/19/25; -One bottle Vitamin B-6 100 milligram (mg) with an expiration date of 06/2024. 3. Observation on 03/20/25 at 11:11 A.M., showed the 200 hall medication cart contained one loose red and white oval gel capsule. 4. Observation on 03/20/25 at 11:20 A.M., showed the 100 A hall medication cart contained one loose oval white tablet. 5. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control as the Infection Preventionist for the facility's infection prevention and control program. The census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Infection Preventionist Control policy, undated, showed the IP will complete the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Long Term Care IP module. Review of the current Infection Preventionist Certificate Of Completion, dated [DATE] showed: -4.0 credit hours; -Web training; -Covered introduction to infection control, transmission, prevention and control, hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, environmental controls, sharps and injection safety, occupational health and safety, and sepsis; -Expiration date of [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:20 A.M., the IP said he/she was not aware the certification had expired. He/She is currently the only active IP person at the facility and is always reviewing infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The census was 83. 1. Review of the facility's Role of the Activity Director policy, dated March 2012, showed the policy does not contain direction or guidance for director certification requirements. During an interview on 3/21/25 at 10:54 A.M., the activity director said he/she was not certified and did not know he/she should be certified. He/She has been in the activity director role for a while. During an interview on 3/20/25 at 8:29 A.M., the Administrator said the activity director is not certified but is working on getting him/her scheduled. He/She was not aware until a couple of weeks ago the director was not certified and started working on getting scheduled for the class.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and out-dated use. Facility staff failed to maintain the mechanical dishwasher in good repair to ensure dishes were effectively washed and sanitized to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to allow cleansed dishes to air-dry prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. Facility staff failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to maintain the kitchen equipment and surfaces in a sanitary manner to prevent the growth of bacteria and cross-contamination. Facility staff also failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary to prevent cross-contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's Receiving and Storage of Food policy, dated April 2011, showed: -The Dining Services Manager is responsible for receiving and storing food and nonfood items; -Follow the rule…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment, when staff failed to ensure resident areas were in good repair and clean. The facility census was 84 with a capacity of 120. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed they did not have a policy for environment, maintenance repairs, and cleaning. 1. Observation on 04/15/24 at 10:01 A.M., showed occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] the wall above the bed with chipped paint. 2. Observation on 04/15/24 at 11:28 A.M., showed occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] walls with multiple large areas gouged. 3. Observation on 04/15/24 at 11:31 A.M., showed occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] with gouged dry wall and missing paint next to the first bed. 4. Observation on 04/15/24 at 11:35 A.M., showed occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] the walls with gouged dry wall and missing paint. The bathroom door gouged, chipped and missing green paint with areas of splintered wood. 5. Observation on 04/15/24 at 11:41 A.M., showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the bed hold policy for five (Residents #18, #19, #23, #340, and #355) of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Hold Guidelines, undated, showed: -The facility will notify all residents and/or their representative of the bed hold guidelines; -This notification shall be given on admission to the facility, at the time of transfer to the hospital, and at the time of non-covered therapeutic leave; -If the resident or resident representative wants to hold the bed, a signed authorization must be obtained with each discharge. 2. Review of Resident #18's medical record showed staff documented the resident had transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE], and transferred on 3/12/24 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's medical record did not contain documentation staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete the required Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment, within the required timeframe for seven residents (Residents #1, #241, #347, #363, #366, #368 and #376) of 22 sampled residents. The census was 84. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed they did not contain a policy for MDS assessments. Review of the RAI manual 3.0 version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, the RAI-Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required Assessment Summary showed assessment time frames as follows: -Quarterly (Non-Comprehensive) MDS completion date not later than ARD + 14 calendar days; -Quarterly assessment for a resident must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type; 2. Review of Resident #1's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the assessment in process and not submitted in the required time frame. All sections reviewed showed in progress and without information. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by staff, had been completed no less frequently than once every 92 days as directed by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, manual used for guidance to complete assessments, for nine residents (Resident #4, #14, #19, #22, #30, #347, #363, #368, and #385) of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility policies provided did not contain a policy for MDS assessments. Review of the RAI manual 3.0 version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, the RAI-Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required Assessment Summary showed assessment time frames as follows: -Quarterly (Non-Comprehensive) MDS completion date not later than ARD + 14 calendar days; -Quarterly assessment for a resident must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. 2. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to encode resident assessment data within seven days after a facility completed a resident's assessment and transmit the assessment timely for fourteen residents (Residents #1, #4, #14, #19, #30, #239, #241, #340, #363, #366, #368, #376, #383, and #385) of 22 sampled residents. The census was 84. 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federal mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) version 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) user manual, showed: -For all non-admission assessments, the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD); -For the admission assessment, the MDS completion date must be no later than 13 days after the entry date; -Encoding data: Within seven days after completing a resident's MDS assessment or tracking record, the provider must encode the MDS data (i.e., enter the information into the facility MDS software). 1. Review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for seven residents (Resident #3, #18, #22, #33, #241, #340, and #376) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed as follows: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The interdisciplinary care plan team with input from the resident, family, and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; -The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes but is not limited to the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool); -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents that were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADL), received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff failed to ensure residents remained clean, dry and free from odor for three residents (Residents #10, #18, and #347) and failed to provide hair care to two residents (Resident #376, and #383) of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), dated March 2015, showed: -Purpose is to assist resident in achieving maximum function; -Gives step-by-step guidance with dressing residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Shaving the Resident, dated March 2015, showed: -Purpose is to remove facial hair and improve the resident's appearance and morale; -Gives step-by-step guidance with shaving residents, does not address the frequency or preferences. Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to lock the medication and treatment carts, and failed to store medications and chemicals in a safe manner. The facility census was 84 with a capacity of 120. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medication, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed to: -All medications must be stored at or near the nurse's station in a locked cabinet, a locked medicine room, or one or more locked mobile carts; -All mobile medication carts must be under visual control of the staff at all times when not stored safely and securely; -All poisonous substances and other hazardous compounds, such as sterilization solutions, irrigation solutions, antiseptics, diagnostic agents, etc must be kept in a locked container; -An unattended medication cart must remain locked at all times, the cart must be locked before leaving it or secured in a locked medication room. 2. Observation on 04/15/24 at 11:12 A.M., showed the 100 hall treatment cart unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain a medication error rate less than five percent (%) out of 29 opportunities observed, six errors occurred which resulted in a 20.7% error rate which effected four residents (Resident #15, #18, #23, and #347) of the six sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Medications, Errors and Drug Reactions, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed to: -Report all medication errors and drug reactions immediately to the physician, Director of Nursing (DON), and administrator; -Provide emergency care to the resident; -Follow physician's orders; -Complete event report; -Chart in the resident's clinical record. Review of the manufacturer's recommendations for Kwik-Pens (ightweight pen that's prefilled with insulin), dated 10/18/15, showed staff were directed to: -Prime the pen before each injection; -To prime the pen turn the dose knob to two units; -Hold the pen with the needle pointing up,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility staff failed to count narcotic medications each shift for three of three medication cart, failed to reconcile one resident's (Resident #242) liquid lorazepam (narcotic antianxiety medication) of 84 sampled residents, failed to separate treatments in one treatment cart of one sampled cart, failed to date medications when opened for ten residents (Resident #238, #240, #18, #351, #21, #27, #348, #345, #350) out of 84 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Narcotic Count, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed to: -Complete a physical inventory of narcotics at each shift change to identify discrepancies; -One Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), or Certified Medication Technician (CMT) going off duty and one RN, LPN, or CMT coming on duty must count and justify accuracy of narcotics supply for each individual resident at the change of shift; -Narcotic records are reconciled by a physical count of the remaining narcotic supply at each shift change by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infections when staff failed to perform hand hygiene in a manner to reduce the spread of infection for four residents (Resident #15, #18, #23, and #347) of four sampled residents, and failed to disinfect a multi-use glucometer (a medical device for determining the approximate concentration of glucose in the blood) between two residents (Resident #15, and #23) of two sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed to: -Place the equipment on a clean surface such as a clean towel; -Put on gloves; -Obtain blood sugar; -Disinfect glucose monitor; -Remove gloves and wash hands. Review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed to use a disposable hand towel to dry hands well and turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity by leaving one resident (Resident #12) exposed to the hallway and failing to properly cover a urinary drainage bag for one resident (Residents #355) of 22 Sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facilities policies showed the policies did not contain a policy for dignity. 2. Review of Resident #12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 02/28/24, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required maximal assistance from staff for dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility; -Dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 04/15/24, showed staff documented the resident with impulsive behaviors and impaired decision making due to cognitive deficits. Review showed the care plan directs staff to provide assistance of one to two staff members for transfers. Observation on 04/15/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for three residents (Resident #33, #36, and #383) out 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan, Temporary, dated March 2015, showed: -A temporary care plan will be implemented to meet the new resident's immediate needs; -To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a temporary care plan will be implemented for the resident within twenty-four hours of admission; -The temporary care plan will be used until the comprehensive assessment has been completed and an interdisciplinary care plan has been developed according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. 2. Review of Resident #33's medical record showed staff documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record did not contain a baseline care plan. 3. Review of Resident #36's medical record showed staff documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure two Nurse Aides ((NA) NA DD and NA P) of three sampled staff completed the nurse aide training program within four months of employment in the facility. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the facilities policies did not contain a policy for NA training or qualifications. Review of NA DD's personnel file showed a hire date of 05/18/23. The file did not contain documentation NA DD completed the nurse aide training program. Review of NA P's personnel file showed a hire date of 08/28/23. The file did not contain documentation NA P completed the nurse aide training program. Review of the facility's payroll, dated April 2024, showed NA DD and NA P worked at the facility as NA's. During an interview on 04/16/24 at 2:16 P.M., the administrator said he/she did not know the facility had two NA's who were not compliant with training. The administrator said the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator schedules and monitors the NA's online classes. During an interview on 04/16/24 at 2:25 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said he/she did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident (Resident #1's) out of six sampled residents family and physician of a fall which resulted in an injury. The facility census was 81. 1. Review of the facility's physician notification, unknown date, showed the facility will immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or interested family member when there is an accident which resulted in injury to the resident and has the potential in requiring physician intervention. 2. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1/9/24, showed diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (A disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), pain, and insomnia. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 3/10/24, showed staff assessed the at risk for falls. Review of the resident's fall risk assessment, dated 12/30/23, showed the resident assessed at a high risk for falling. Review of the resident's nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure menus were followed when staff did not prepare all food items as directed by the recipe. The facility census was 65. 1. Review of facility's Food Preparation and Distribution policy date April 2011 showed recipes should be followed on each item prepared. Review of the Philly cheese steak sandwich recipe showed ingredients for 100 servings as follows: -12 pounds plus eight ounces of Philly beef steak -Seven pounds plus four ounce of sliced onions -Six pounds plus four ounces of sliced American cheese Observation on 12/29/2022 at 2:40 P.M., showed [NAME] N added a two pound bag of chopped green peppers to a pan of cooked beef steak. He/She poured an unmeasured amount of Mozzarella cheese from two previously opened bags into the pan of beef and stirred. The Philly cheese steak was served at the evening meal. During an interview on 12/29/2022 at 3:20 P.M., [NAME] N said he/she follows recipes when preparing meals. He/She said the beef steak was given to him/her to prepare so he/she did not know how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain correct dishwasher water temperatures and follow proper procedures for ware washing in the three compartment sink. This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 65. 1. Review of the facility's Dish machine Temperature policy dated April 2011 showed: -Actual wash and rinse temperatures must be observed and logged at the beginning of the dishwashing period by the dish machine operator; -Report temperatures that are below the required levels to the Dietary Services manager immediately. Review of the dishwasher general operating instructions wall poster in the dishwashing area showed: -It is recommended that 140 degree water be used; -Report to your supervisor if it is lower than 120 degrees F or higher than 160 degrees. Review of the dishwasher daily start up procedures showed: -Fill machine with water using fill switch; -If water temperature gauge has not reached 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) when the water level is just below overflow, drain water from the machine and continue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to properly contain waste and refuse to prevent the harboring and/or feeding of rodents and pests when the facility failed to maintain the lids to cover the outdoor dumpster in good repair. The facility census was 65. 1. Observation on 12/29/22 at 8:00 A.M., showed trash bags stacked inside the outdoor dumpster high above the top of the dumpster. Further observation showed the two lids to cover the dumpster pushed inside of the dumpster and the bottom half of each lid missing due to breakage. During an interview on 12/29/22 at 8:00 A.M., the maintenance director said the dumpster lids had been broken for a while. The Maintenance Director said he/she called the trash company about two weeks ago and asked them for a new dumpster and they said they would not provide one. The Maintenance Director said he/she did not ask the company to replace the broken lids and he/she had not contacted anyone else to have the lids repaired. During an interview on 12/29/22 at 2:15 P.M., the administrator said the dumpster…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-30 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review facility staff failed to ensure the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) (CMS-10055) was completed for three residents (Resident #265, #41, and #269). The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the facility policies showed the facility did not provide a policy addressing Advanced Beneficiary Notices. 2. Review of Resident #265's SNFABN review form completed by the facility showed the facility documented: - Medicare part A skilled services started 10/26/22; - Last covered day of part A service was 11/17/22; - The resident did not document a payment option before the CMS-10055 was signed. 3. Review of Resident #41's SNFABN review form completed by the facility showed the facility documented: - Medicare part A skilled services started 9/6/22; - Last covered day of part A service was 9/30/22; - The resident did not document a payment option before the CMS-10055 was signed. 4. Review of Resident #269's SNFABN review form completed by the facility showed the facility documented:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility staff failed to ensure four residents (Residents #4, #50, #264 and #269) who required staff assistance were provided with adequate assistance to maintain good grooming and hygiene. The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the Facility's shower policy, dated March 2015, showed staff were directed as follows: -Purpose is to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness; -Encourage the resident to do as much as possible; -Wash face and entire body, shampoo hair and rinse well; -Dry the resident well; -Dress the resident and dry hair well, comb and style hair. 2. Review of Resident #4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 10/04/2022 showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control), vertigo and muscle weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide safe mechanical lift transfers for three residents (Residents #7, #12 and #47) in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility staff also failed to ensure razors/sharps and hazardous chemicals were stored in safe manner not accessible to residents. The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the Invacare Reliant 600 Heavy-Duty Power Lift instruction guide, dated 2018, showed the guide instructed operators of the lift that the legs must be kept in the maximum open position for stability and safety. Review showed if it is necessary to close the legs of the lift to maneuver the lift under a bed, the guide instructed operators to close the legs only as long as it takes to position the lift over the patient, then return the legs to the maximum open position. Review of the facility's Hydraulic Lift (Hoyer Lift) policy, dated March 2015, showed the policy directed staff to open the lift to the widest point and set the brakes. 2. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility staff failed to communicate pharmacy recommendations to the physicians for four residents (Resident #3, #11, #37, and #41) to prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible. The facility census is 65. 1. Review of the facility's Drug Review policy, dated March 2015, showed: -All medications given to each resident will be reviewed on a monthly basis in order to insure adherence to stop orders; -The pharmacist reviews all federal indicators, and a monthly report form is filled out to show any problem areas; -Problems identified shall be addressed according to need in consultation with physician; -Determine the most acceptable time frame to attempt reduction of drug dosage from behavior evaluation. Review of the facility's Physician Services policy, dated March 2015, showed: -The resident's attending physician is responsible for prescribing new therapy, to ensure that the resident receives quality care and medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (a chemical substance that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) orders were limited to 14 days unless a specific duration and clinical rationale were provided for one resident (Resident #37) and failed to perform Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) on psychotropic medications for two residents (Resident #11 and #57). The facility census was 28. 1. Review of the facility's Drug Review policy, dated March 2015, showed: -All medications given to each resident will be reviewed on a monthly basis in order to insure adherence to stop orders; -The pharmacist reviews all federal indicators, and a monthly report form is filled out to show any problem areas; -Problems identified shall be addressed according to need in consultation with physician; -Determine the most acceptable time frame to attempt reduction of drug dosage from behavior evaluation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to store and label medication in a safe and effective manner in one of one medication storage carts. The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated March 2015, showed staff are directed as follows: -No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs and biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines; -Drugs must be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, or carts. Observation on 12/29/22 at 9:00 A.M., showed the 100 hall medication cart contained: -One Meclizine 25 mg tablet pack with 26 tablets remaining with an expiration date of 8/5/22; -One loose white tablet with 66/422 stamped on it; -One Zinc 50 mg bottle with and expiration date of 6/22; -Two loose blue tablets with #41 stamped on it; -One loose yellow tablet with #81 stamped on it; -One loose yellow tablet with #8 stamped on it; -Six loose white tablets unknown; -One loose yellow tablet with #33 stamped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure all employees were screened for Tuberculosis (TB), a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs), when staff failed to ensure a two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for TB) was completed and documented as per policy for five out of ten sampled employees (Dietary Aide S, Registered Nurse T, Licensed Practical Nurse U, Housekeeper V, and Certified Nurse Assistant P). The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis Control Policy, undated, showed: -Recommendations for employees: --Initial examination: provide a tuberculin skin test (Mantoux, five tuberculin units (TU) of PPD to all employees during pre-employment procedures, unless a previous reaction greater than 10 millimeters (mm) is documented. If the initial skin test is 0-9 mm, a second test should be given at least one week and no more than three weeks after the first test. The results of the second test should be used as the baseline in determining treatment and follow-up of these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-30 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed upon discharge for one sampled resident (Resident #61) out of three sampled closed records. The facility census was 65. 1. Record review of the facility's Discharge Planning policy dated April 2006 showed: -The Social Service Department will have primary responsibility for discharge planning within the facility; -The discharge summary will include the events leading to admission, the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and adjustment of the resident, and plans at discharge. Review of Resident #61's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of profound intellectual disabilities and was discharged on 10/03/2022. Review of discharge note dated 10/04/2022 showed the Social Services Director (SSD) documented the resident was discharged to another facility on 10/03/2022. Review of the resident's electronic medical record showed the record did not contain documentation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-30 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked, by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, and on a daily basis. The facility staff also failed to keep the required daily staffing records for eighteen months. The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the facility policies showed staff did not provide a policy for nurse staff posting. Review of the facility's records showed the record did not contain nurse staff posting for the required 18 months. Observation on 12/27/22 at 10:48 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. Observation on 12/28/22 at 9:19 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. Observation on 12/29/22 at 7:42 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. Observation on 12/30/22 at 7:46 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. During an interview on 12/30/22 at 9:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINCOLN, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2008 |
| LINCOLN, JUDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2008 |
| MARSTEN, AMANDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| BYSOR, BRANDON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/30/2022 |
| DRAKE, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2008 |
| STUTTS, CHARLOTTE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265181. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.