Clearview Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 60.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used acceptable infection control procedures and practices for wound care for two residents (Residents #1 and #55) out of two sampled residents, one resident (Resident #4) for catheter (a flexible tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) care out of one sampled resident, and one resident (Resident #6) with a gastrostomy tube (g-tube - a medical device surgically placed through the abdomen directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medication when oral intake is unsafe or insufficient) out of one sampled resident. The facility also failed to ensure laundry was processed in a way to limit the spread of infections. This practice could potentially affect all residents. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised March 2024, showed:- To prevent broader transmission of multi-drug resistance organisms (MDROs) and to help protect patients with chronic wounds and indwelling devices, enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained or enhanced the quality of life for two residents (Residents #8 and #54) and failed to maintain the dignity of one resident (Resident #55) when left exposed during care out of 16 sampled residents. The facility's census was 62. The facility did not provide a dignity policy. 1. Observation on 03/02/26 at 12:11 P.M., of Resident #8 showed:- The resident sat in the hall and asked two different staff that passed by for a cup of coffee; - No staff acknowledged the resident. Observation on 03/02/26 at 12:31 P.M., showed:- The resident asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J if he/she could have a cup of coffee as CNA J walked by;- CNA J responded in a loud and stern voice, No, the kitchen is closed. CNA J continued to walk past the resident without offering another option or redirecting the resident. During an interview on 03/02/26 at 12:32 P.M., CNA J said the staff try not to give the resident coffee because it caused the resident to be anxious and then the resident wanted to get out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess for the risk of entrapment, review the possible risks and benefits of the side rails prior to installation or use, and the facility failed to obtain informed consent of the side rails prior to use for four residents (Residents #1, #6, #52, and #55) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's policy titled, Minimum Data Sets (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility) and Care Planning Guidelines, dated September 2013, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, any published interim RAI manual errata (error) documents, and applicable federal guidelines as the authoritative guide for completion of MDS, care area assessments (CAA), and resident care planning. 1.Review of Resident #1's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnoses of fracture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess for the risk of entrapment, review the possible risks and benefits of the side rails prior to installation or use, and the facility failed to obtain informed consent of the side rails prior to use for four residents (Residents #1, #6, #52, and #55) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a side rail assessment policy. 1.Review of Resident #1's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnoses of fracture (broken bone) of the left leg, pain, muscle weakness, and chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD - a long-term chronic airway disease);- Cognition moderately impaired;- No documentation of a side rail assessment or informed consent for the use of side rails. Observation on 03/02/26 at 1:10 P.M., 03/03/26 at 10:00 A.M., 03/04/26 at 8:50 A.M., and 03/05/26 at 9:00 A.M., showed:- The resident's bed with both half side rails in an upright position. Observation on 03/04/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to post the required daily nurse staffing information in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors for four out of four days. The facility census was 62.The facility did not provide a policy on nurse staff posting. Observations on 03/02/26 at 12:05 P.M., 03/03/26 at 9:00 A.M., 03/04/26 at 8:45 A.M., and 03/05/26 at 12:30 P.M., showed:- Daily nurse staffing posted on the east end of the facility near the nurses' station;- No daily nurse staffing posted at the main entrance of the facility or at the west end area of the facility;- Daily nurse staffing not posted in a prominent place readily accessible to all residents and visitors. During an interview on 03/05/26 at 1:30 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) K said the nursing staff information had always been posted on the east end of the facility. He/she had never known of the staffing posted anywhere else in the facility. During an interview on 03/05/26 at 1:33 P.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and side rails as part of a regular maintenance program for four residents (Residents #1, #6, #52 and #55) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 62. The facility did not provide a side rail inspection policy. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed:- admitted on [DATE];- Diagnoses of fracture (broken bone) of the left leg, pain, muscle weakness, and chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD - a long-term chronic airway disease);- No maintenance inspection for the side rail. Observations on 03/02/26 at 1:10 P.M., and 03/03/26 at 10:00 A.M., of the resident's bed showed:- A side rail in the upright position on both half sides of the resident's bed and moved with minimal effort. Observation on 03/04/26 at 8:50 A.M., and 03/05/26 at 9:00 A.M, showed:- The resident lay in bed with both half side rails in an upright position. 2. Review of Resident #6's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed within reach to meet resident needs for five residents (Residents #5, #6, #52, #54 and #67) out of 16 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #12) outside the sample. The facility census was 62.The facility did not provide a call light policy. 1. Observations on 03/02/26 at 9:56 A.M., and 2:13 P.M., 03/03/26 at 8:33 A.M., and 12:47 P.M., and 03/04/26 at 2:28 P.M., of Resident #67 showed:- The resident lay in bed and the call light out lay on the floor out of the resident's reach;- The resident sat in a Geri-chair (a specialized, heavy padded recliner) and the call light lay on the floor out of the resident's reach. 2. Observations on 03/02/26 at 9:59 A.M., and 2:17 P.M., and 03/03/26 at 8:25 A.M., and 2:31 P.M., of Resident #52 showed:- The resident lay in bed and the call light lay on the floor out of the resident's reach. 3. Observations on 03/02/26 at 1:26 P.M., and 3:45 P.M., 03/03/26 at 8:25 A.M., 10:08 A.M., and 1:17 P.M., and 03/04/26 at 12:44 P.M., of Resident #5 showed:- The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year and failed to provide the required annual competencies of Dementia Care (care of a resident with an impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), Abuse (infliction of physical, sexual or emotional injury/harm), and Neglect (failure to provide necessary services for an adult's safety or health) prevention for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) (CNA C and CNA D) out of two sampled CNAs. The facility census was 62.The facility did not provide a nurse aide in-service education policy. Review of the facility's 2026 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan showed:- The facility will provide the necessary training to enable staff to perform their jobs effectively;- Ongoing training includes mandatory all-staff competency updates addressing topics such as changes in policies and procedures and regulatory requirements. Review of the Facility Assessment, revised 01/21/26, showed:- Topics to be trained at hire and annually thereafter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond or act upon grievances, and failed to keep documentation of inventory for two residents (Residents #23 and #48) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance Protocol, undated, showed: - The purpose of the grievance/complaint report and grievance log is to provide a written record of each resident and family concern and to insure proper follow-up through the appropriate discipline; - The Social Service Director (SSD) is responsible for the program, although the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the proper implementation; - Grievance complaint should be filled out for resident articles that are lost or cannot be located; - Social Services and Administrator evaluate the monthly grievance log for trends or patterns and devise an action plan to correct issues. A new log should be completed each month. The facility did not provide an inventory policy. Review of the facility's Grievance Log showed an empty binder with no documentation of any reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for code status for two residents (Residents #14 and #38) and consistently document a resident's code status with Full Code (cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions if the heart stops beating or the person stops breathing) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - does not want CPR) for one resident (Resident #35) out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's policy titled, DNR Protocol, not dated, showed: - The Social Services Designee (SSD) will be responsible to print all DNR order forms on lavender paper to be placed in the admission packet; - Once the DNR form is signed by the resident or legal representative it is to be signed by the physician; - The SSD will then complete the following: a green paper with Full Code or a red paper with DNR will be placed in the very front of the medical record in a plastic sheet protector; on the Physician Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO