No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

524 North Laura, Maryville, MO 64468 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (660) 582-7447 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)3 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$86,912 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $86,912 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-11)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 36% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2016 S Main St · (660) 562-2525 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
125 E South Ave · (660) 562-2300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hy-Vee1.3 mi
1217 S Main St · (660) 582-2191 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Beal Park0.1 mi
698 N Laura St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased34.8%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.9%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.7%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.8%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.8%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.8%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.7%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.0%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.7%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.652.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.532.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.4%CMS range 37.1–64.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 8.7–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization11.1%CMS range 5.9–20.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
68.9%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 43.1 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-19)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1), who resided on the Special Care Unit (SCU), from abuse when Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A hit Resident #1 in the face with an open hand. The facility staff then allowed the Alleged Perpetrator (AP) to stay in direct contact with Resident #1 and without supervision for over 2.5 hours. The facility census was 54. On 12/11/24, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance immediate jeopardy (IJ) which began on 12/11/24. Upon discovery, the facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented. The IJ was corrected on 12/11/24. Review of the undated facility Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Policy showed: -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of residents; -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator; -While a facility investigation is underway, steps will be taken to prevent further abuse; -If a person is identified in the allegation of abuse, that person will not be allowed access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide follow up care in a timely manner after one resident, Resident #2, sustained a fall, had reported signs of pain, did not receive treatment for four days and subsequently had a fractured hip. The facility census was 43.Review of the facility policy titled, Skilled Fall, Policy dated 05/2025 showed each resident of this community who experiences a fall will be treated and assessed to adequately treat any current injuries. Review of the facility policy titled, Significant Condition Change and Notification, dated 12/2024, showed:-To ensure the resident's medical practitioner was notified of resident changes such as: an accident or incident with or without injury that has the potential for needed medical intervention;-Mobility changes;-Abnormal, unusual or new complaints of pain;-Need to significantly alter treatment. Review of the facility policy titled, Pain Management, dated 02/2025 showed:-It is the policy of this facility to respect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an injury for one Resident (Resident #1) of the four sampled residents, when the facility staff did not follow the resident's care plan and did not properly transfer the resident, causing a fracture to the right lower leg. The facility census was 48.Review of the undated facility policy titled Transfers Training Policy showed:- Transfers are assessed to determine each resident needs;- Transfer assist needs are located on the resident's care plan;- Always check the resident's transfer requirements before transferring the resident;- All mechanical lifts require two people. If the plan of care is not followed, progressive disciplinary action will proceed up to and including termination.Review of the facility's Safe Lifting and Movement Policy, dated 12/24, showed:-Resident safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents;-Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible;-Nursing staff responsible for direct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for one (Resident #1) of five sampled residents, and failed to follow their hot liquids policy, when a staff member brought in a personal coffee pot at the nursing station area and the nursing staff provided a hot coffee to the resident without checking the temperature before serving and leaving the resident unsupervised. The resident spilled the coffee and sustained burns to his/her chest and abdomen. The facility census was 44. On 9/2/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance incident which occurred on 08/25/25. On 09/2/25, the facility administration was notified of the incident, an investigation immediately began and corrective actions were implemented to include:- All facility staff educated on the hot beverage policy;- Dietary staff to send air pots (a system that brews coffee directly into a portable, vacuum-insulated beverage dispenser which keeps the coffee hot for extended periods of time) of coffee at meals and at afternoon snack time for residents who want…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect two residents who resided on the Memory Care Unit (Resident #1 and #5) from physical abuse by Resident #2, when Resident #2 pulled Resident #1's hair and hit Resident #5 with a water pitcher full of water, causing redness and mental distress for Resident #5. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Prevention, Prohibition Policy dated 3/2025 showed: -Each resident has right to be free from abuse; -Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including other residents; -The facility prohibits mistreatment or abuse of residents; - Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. On 5/7/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance situation which occurred on 4/27/25. On 4/27/25, facility administration was notified of the incident, an investigation immediately began and corrective actions were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for one resident, who resided on the Special Care Unit, (Resident #1), when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A took a picture of Resident #1, without resident or family/guardian consent and shared it with a coworker. The facility census was 48Review of the facility provided Resident Rights Policy dated 12/2024 showed:-Each resident residing in this community has the right and will be afforded the right to a dignified existence;-It is the responsibility of all who work in this community including employees, to protect the rights of each resident;-Resident Rights include privacy and confidentiality.Review of Resident #1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) showed:-He/She had significant cognitive loss; -He/She was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs: tasks completed in a day to care for oneself); -Diagnosis of dementia and hearing loss. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan date 03/25/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1) right to be free from misappropriation of property, when an employee did not follow policy for accurate narcotic (highly addictive prescription medication) count, did not visualize liquid narcotic medication during count procedures and the resident was missing 40 milligrams (mg) of morphine sulfate (liquid narcotic medication that is highly addictive) medication on 06/29/26 and no documented use. The facility census was 45.Review of the facility Controlled Substance Policy dated 12/2024 showed:-Controlled substances are subject to special record keeping requirements;-The authorized person receiving and checking in a drug is to prepare a controlled substance proof of use record form;-Thereafter a physical inventory of that medication will be made at the change of each nursing shift;-All controlled substances are to be counted every shift; -The on-coming nurse or Certified Medication Technician (CMT) will be responsible for looking at the medication to verify the amount of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient staff to prevent one resident (Resident #2) who resided on the Special Care Unit, from exiting the facility unattended, sustaining a fall in the courtyard, obtaining a 6 inch abrasion to his/her arm and caused extreme pain, while unaccompanied by staff. The facility census was 48.Review of the facility provided Skilled Fall Policy dated 05/2025 showed:-The fall program promotes safety, prevention and education of both staff and residents; -Each resident will be provided services and care that ensures that the resident's environment remains as free from accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents.Review of the facility provided Elopement Policy dated 09/2025 showed:-It is the policy of this facility that all residents are afforded adequate supervision to provide the safest environment possible; -When a door alarm sounds staff shall immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriate discharge for one resident, (Resident #1), of six sampled residents, when the facility refused to allow the resident to return to the facility after hospitalization, based on the resident's behaviors prior to hospitalization. The facility census was 46. Review of the facility provided, undated Notice of Transfer/Discharge form showed:-You may only be transferred or discharged from this nursing facility for one of the following reasons: the safety of individuals in this facility is endangered; -This facility plans to transfer/discharge you to the following location.The facility did not provide a policy on Discharge. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 03/27/26 showed:-Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three (3), indicated significant cognitive loss; -No behaviors; -Diagnoses included: Stroke, high blood pressure, vision loss,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #1) from misappropriation, when $600 of the resident's money went missing from the Social Services Designee's (SSD) office. The facility did not reimburse the resident for the missing money until 03/10/26. The facility census 43.Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated November 2025, showed:-This facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse or residents; -The facility prohibits misappropriation of resident property;-Misappropriation of Resident Property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent;-Social Services or designee will assist the resident/family to identify and mark personal possessions upon admission;- An inventory will be completed and maintained in the resident's clinical record;-Social Services or designee will educate the resident/family of the need to report any items of significance being brought in or removed so that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #1's MRR, dated 4/2/25 showed: - The pharmacist recommended Bupropion XL 300 mg every day, Clonazepam 0.5 mg three times daily and Risperidone 0.25 mg twice daily for review; the physician responded the dose had recently been changed, no changes. Review of the resident's Significant Change in Status MDS, dated [DATE] showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Diagnoses included cerebral palsy (CP), seizure disorder and anxiety; - The resident received antipsychotics on a regular basis; - 4/17/25 - GDR documented as contraindicated. Review of the resident's POS, dated June, 2025 showed; - Start date - 3/6/25 - Risperidone 0,25 mg., one tab by mouth every morning and at bedtime related to mood disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified. Review of the resident's MAR, dated June, 2025 showed: - Risperidone 0,25 mg., one tab by mouth every morning and at bedtime related to mood disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified. Review of the resident's undated care plan showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond that was equal or greater than one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the residents' trust fund (RTF) account for the last 12 consecutive months from June 2024 to May 2025. The facility census was 46. The facility did not have a policy regarding surety bonds. Record review on 6/19/25 of the RTF account for the last 12 consecutive months from June 2024 to May 2025 showed: -The facility's current approved bond amount equaled $50,000; -The average monthly balance for the RTF account equaled $36,248.59 (which was determined using the total of each ending balance for the last 12 month bank statements plus the petty cash ending balances and divided by 12 months); -An average monthly balance of $36,000 required a bond of at least $54,000; -Surety Bond #PB11511001715 dated July 22, 2022, was changed from $60,000 to $50,000 on July 1, 2022; -Department of Health & Senior Services approved the surety bond adjustment #PB11511001715 to $50,000 on July 22, 2022. During an interview on 6/17/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect policy when they failed to obtain criminal background checks results prior to staff working with residents and check the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect). This affected eight of ten sampled staff (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A, CNA B, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A, Housekeeping Aide (HA) A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, CNA C, and HA B.). The facility census was 46. Review of facility policy, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated 12/2024, showed: -The facility will not knowingly employ individuals who have been found guilty of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating residents, or misappropriating their properties. -All employee will have criminal background checks, state and federal required checks, and license/certification confirmation. -The facility will make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #20's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Diagnoses included cancer and multiple sclerosis. Review of the resident's POS, dated June, 2025 showed: - Start date: 6/15/25 - Clean oxygen concentrator filter with water and allow to air dry weekly every night shift every Sunday; - Start date: 6/15/25 - Oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula (2L/NC) to keep oxygen saturation greater than 95% every shift; - Start date: 6/15/25 - Change oxygen tubing every Sunday night on the night shift. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated June 2025 showed: - Clean oxygen concentrator filter with water and allow to air dry weekly every night shift every Sunday; - Oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula (2L/NC) to keep oxygen saturation greater than 95% every shift; - Change oxygen tubing every Sunday night on the night shift. Review of the resident's undated care plan, showed it did not address the use of oxygen. Observation on 6/16/25 at 11:05 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics administered to residents with various infections conditions. The sample size was three Resident #8, #12 and #23. The census was 46. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 2019 showed: -The mission of the program is to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections; -An antibiotic stewardship program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use; -Antibiotics stewardship and review including reviewing data to monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics in the resident population; -Responsible to collect, analyze, provide infection data and trends to nursing staff and healthcare practitioners; -Surveillance including ongoing, systematic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care, which affected one of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #3). The facility census was 46. The facility did not provide a policy for perineal care. 1. Review of Resident #1's urinalysis (UA, test to analyze urine contents), dated 2/20/25 showed the presence of bacteria indicative of a possible urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the resident's urine culture and sensitivity ( UA with C & S, identifies the amount and type of bacteria present and the medications appropriate to treat the infection), dated 2/20/25, showed the presence of organisms indicative of a possible UTI. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 2/21/25 showed: - Ceftriaxone (broad spectrum antibiotic used to treat UTIs) Sodium injection solution, reconstituted one gram intramuscularly in the evening for infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) out of five sampled residents were free from abuse when three staff members took photos of four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) and one staff member took a video (Resident #2) and posted it to social media. Two of the pictures taken had a demeaning comment written on the pictures about the residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Three of the four residents had a diagnosis of dementia and all four residents were unaware that they had been recorded or had their pictures taken and posted to a social media platform. The facility census was 44. On 3/11/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on 02/10/2025. The facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented. The noncompliance was corrected 02/28/2025. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention, and Prohibition, revised January 2024, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, failed to take food temperatures on the steam table before food service and when cooking items, failed to reheat foods to safe temperatures before serving, stored glasses with openings facing up, stored eggs on the floor, did not properly sanitize food preparation surfaces in kitchen, did not have a thermometer in refrigeration unit, did not ensure proper parts per million (PPM) sanitation levels were reached while using a 3 compartment sink, did not wash hands after contamination, did not have paper towels available at hand washing sink, and when dietary staff did not wear hairnets prior to entering kitchen. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of facility policy, Receiving and storage of food, dated May 2015, showed: -Keep storage areas clean and dry. Review of facility policy, storage of dry food and supplies, dated May 2015, showed: -Storeroom must be neat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respect resident rights of six residents out of the 15 sampled residents, when the facility failed to provide grooming for three residents ( #312, #36, #44) and failed to respect the privacy of three residents (#25, #40, #43). The facility census was 59. Facility did not provide a dignity policy. Review of facility policy, shaving the resident, undated, showed: To remove facial hair and improve the resident's appearance and morale. Review of facility policy, resident rights, undated, showed: -Residents will be provided the highest level of care and service; -Each resident shall be treated with consideration, respect a full recognition of his/her dignity, and individuality. -Right to dignified existence 1. Review of Resident #312's admission face sheet showed: Resident was admitted on [DATE] -Bipolar disorder (mental health disorder that alternates between depression and mania); -Macular degeneration (progressive loss of vision);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered a choice of when they would like to get up in the morning. This affected two of the 15 sampled residents (Residents #30, and #43). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated 6/12/24 showed in part: -Each resident shall be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her individuality; -Each resident shall not have the right to self determination which includes the right to a choice of schedules and accommodations for preferences. 1. Review of Resident #30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 4/13/24 showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Partial assistance with showers and personal hygiene; -Substantial assistance with dressing and transfers; -Dependent on staff for bed mobility; -Diagnosis included traumatic brain injury (TBI, injury to the brain from a violent blow or jolt to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of resident council and act promptly upon grievances and recommendations made by the group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility when the facility failed to demonstrate their response and rationale for such responses when they did not maintain documentation of resident concerns, facility's attempt to resolve concerns, or the facility's follow up actions. This affected all the residents serving on the resident counsel and potentially other residents of the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, resident rights, undated, showed: -Each resident shall be encouraged and assisted throughout his/her stay to exercise their rights as Resident and citizen, and may voice grievances and recommend changes in policies and services to facility staff or outside representatives of his/her choice. A staff person shall designated to receive grievances and Residents may voice their complaints and recommendations to staff designee, an ombudsman, or any person outside facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents how to file a grievance or complaint, take prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances voiced in resident council meetings when the same problems were voiced multiple months with no resolutions and failed to follow up with one resident's family member (Resident #43) with resolution regarding a grievance made to the facility. The facility census was 59. Review of nursing home resident right's, undated, showed: -Right to raise grievances: -Present grievances without discrimination or retaliation, or fear of it; -Prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances, and provide a written decision upon request. Review of facility policy, resident grievances, undated, showed: -Resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility; -A complaint must be in writing and contain the name and address of the person filing it; -The grievance coordinator (or designee) shall conduct an investigation of the complaint to determine its validity; -The grievance coordinator will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person centered comprehensive care plans for two residents (Resident #15 and #44) to address dehydration and falls (resident #15) and code status (Resident #44). The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, care plan comprehensive, undated, showed: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. -Assessment of each resident is ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition. 1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 4/22/24, showed: -He/She was severely cognitively impaired; -He/She was dependent on a walker for mobility; -He/She had fall history prior to admission, but no falls the last 2-6 months; -He/She required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards when staff failed to administer medications within the appropriate time frame, which affected three of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident #21, #28 and #29). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's undated policy for the medication administration guidelines showed: - It is the purpose of the facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies. Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which an authorized person, in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts, gives a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological to a resident. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose tot he proper resident, and promptly recording the information; - Medications may not be prepared in advance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) received the necessary assistance with bathing, incontinent care. This affected four out of the 17 sampled residents, when the facility staff failed to ensure two residents (Resident #4 and #43) received regular showers, failed to provide complete incontinence care for two residents (Resident #33 and #40) The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's undated Perineal Care policy showed: -Wash hands and apply clean gloves; -Using a clean wipe separate and cleanse all skin folds that have came in contact with urine or feces; -Wash from front to back. Review of the facilty's undated Resident Rights policy showed; -Residents have the right to dignified existence; -Residents have the right to be treated with consideration, respect and dignity, recognizing each residents individuality; -Residents have the right to a quality of life that is maintained or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the staff failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Staff failed to ensure one resident was served the accurate therapeutic ordered diet (Resident #27) and staff failed to ensure medication was administered when a controlled medication was left on a resident's card table for two days (Resident #49). This affected two of fifteen sampled residents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of injuries during the use of sit to stand (a lift that allows residents who can bear weight to transfer from a sitting position to a standing position) transfer, which affected Resident #43. The facility census was 59. Facility did not provide a policy regarding prevention of accidents. Review of facility policy, diet orders, undated, showed: -Diet orders prescribed by the attending physician shall be reviewed monthly by the dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide services to residents to maintain highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when residents did not receive showers which affected one of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident #43), meal service was late which affected all the residents, activities were not offered due to activity director being pulled to cover the floor, and medications were late which affected Resident # 21, #28 and #29. The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a policy for staffing. The facility did not provide a policy for showers. 1. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff dated 4/12/24 showed: - Cognitive skills severely impaired; - Lower extremity impaired on one side; - Required substantial to maximal assistance with toilet use, dressing and transfers; - Had a Suprapubic catheter (a catheter which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication rate of less than five percent (5%). Facility staff made nine medication errors out of 28 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 32.14%. This affected five of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #3, #4, #12, #48 and #53). The facility census was 59. Review of the manufactures guidelines for Novolog insulin FlexPen dated July 2023 showed: -Clean the area with an alcohol swab and let dry; -Hold the needle in the skin for at least 6 seconds before removing the needle. Review of the manufactures guidelines for Levimir FlexTouch insulin pen dated March 2024 showed in part: -Clean the area with an alcohol swab and let dry; -Hold the needle in the skin for at least 6 seconds before removing the needle. The facilty did no provide the requested policy on insulin administration. 1. Review of Resident #3's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), dated June 2024 showed: -Start date: 3/2/20 - Novolog insulin FlexPen (fast-acting) 100 units/millilliter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a locked storage area to ensure medications were inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents, when the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. Additionally, the staff failed to discard a vial of the Influenza Vaccine after it had expired and failed to ensure medication had had a pharmacy label on it. The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, storage of medications, undated, showed: -All medications for residents must be stored at or near the nurse's station in a locked cabinet, a locked medicine room, or one or more locked mobile medicaiton carts. -All mobile medication carts must be under visual control of the staff at all times when not stored safetly and securely. Carts must be either in a locked room or otherwise made immobile. -All controlled substances must be stored under double lock and key. -An unattended medication cart must remain locked at all times. In the event the nurse is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately staff the kitchen with enough dietary staff to ensure the cleanliness of the kitchen, and meals were served to residents in a timely manner. This has the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 59. Facility did not provide a policy regarding dietary staffing. 1. Review of Resident # 40's Significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff dated 4/7/24, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - He/She was independent with eating - Diagnoses included high blood pressure, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (A digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining), and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 4/25/24 showed: -Resident was at nutritional risk for having strong food preferences and personal choices on not leaving his/her room for meals; -Regular diet; -Dietary to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature to the residents when hot food was not served at an appetizing temperature to three (resident #40, #43, and #312) of fifteen sampled residents. The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, food temperatures, dated April 2015, showed: -Hot foods should be at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit when served to the resident. 1. Review of Resident # 40's Significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff dated 4/7/24, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - He/She was independent with eating - Diagnoses included high blood pressure, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (A digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining), and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 4/25/24 showed: -Resident was at nutritional risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible for residents in their rooms when call lights were out of reach for two of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident # 43 and #44). The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, use of call light, undated, showed: -When providing care to residents, be sure to position the call light conveniently for the resident's use. -Tell the resident where the call light is and show him/her how to use the call light. -Be sure all call lights are placed on the bed at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. 1. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/12/24 showed: - Cognitive skills severely impaired; - Lower extremity impaired on one side; - Required substantial to maximal assistance with toilet use, dressing and transfers; - Had a Suprapubic catheter (a catheter which enters the bladder through the lower abdomen; - Frequently incontinent of bowel; - Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation the facility failed to protect the resident's right to personal privacy when a nurse left the medication cart computer screen unattended, unlocked, and visible with resident personal information accessible to anyone near the computer screen. The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, electronic medical records, undated, showed: -Only authorized persons who have been issued a password and a user identification (ID) code will be permitted access to the electronic medical records system. -The facility electronic medical records system has: -safeguards to prevent unauthorized access; -individual password and user ID codes and permission is established to ensure only authorized persons enter appropriate data; -will not permit a change on the record once it had been locked without the approval of the person that completed the assessment. Review of facility policy, resident rights, undated, showed: -All information contained in resident's medical, personal, or financial record and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and document a pressure ulcer (an area of localized damage to skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shear, friction and/or a combination of these) for one of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident #43). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's undated policy for wound care and treatment showed, in part: - The purpose of the facility is to prevent and treat all wounds; - There must be a specific order for the treatment; - Prevention strategies - On - going skin assessment with weekly documentation of status. Minimize dry skin. Apply house moisturizer to areas of dry skin, after and as needed. Avoid massage over bony prominence's. Minimize friction and sheer through proper positioning transferring and turning. Develop and implement method of communicating position changing; - Incontinence management - Minimize skin exposure to incontinence, perspiration and /or wound drainage. Use cloth clothing protector…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served to meet the needs of the residents when staff failed to serve food items for each diet type when staff failed to prepare food according to the menu and failed to serve the correct portion sizes per the menu. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, menus, dated May 2015, showed: -Menus shall meet the nutritional needs of the resident in accordance with the attending physician's orders and the recommended dietary allowances; -Any unusual or complex diet not printed on the menu or listed in the Manual shall be written by the consulting dietician based on physicians orders. Review of facility menus, day 16 lunch, showed: -Regular baked chicken: portion size 3 ounces (oz); -Pureed baked chicken: portion size/serving utensil #8 scoop; 5 servings recipe showed : -3 oz chicken,1/2 cup + 2 tablespoons stock chicken soup based,1 Tablespoon + 3/4 teaspoon food thickener; -Minced and moist chicken: portion size #8 scoop, 5 serving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet individual needs when residents were served food not consistent with their dietary orders (Resident #27). This affected one of fifteen sampled residents. The facility census was 59. Review of facility policy, menus, dated May 2015, showed: -Menus shall meet the nutritional needs of the resident in accordance with the attending physician's orders and the recommended dietary allowances; -Any unusual or complex diet not printed on the menu or listed in the Diet Manual shall be written by the consulting dietician based on physicians orders. Review of facility policy, diet communication form, dated April 2006, showed: -It is the responsibility of the nursing department to communicate all information associated with the residents diet order to the dietary department via the dietary communication form; -A dietary communication form will be completed when there is a change in diet. 1. Review of Resident #27's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection when staff failed to wash hands between dirty and clean tasks which affected one of the 15 sampled residents, (Resident #43). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility's undated policy for handwashing showed: - The purpose is to reduce transmission of organisms form resident to resident, nursing staff to resident and resident to nursing staff; - The policy did not indicate when staff should wash or sanitize their hands. 1. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/12/24 showed: - Cognitive skills severely impaired; - Lower extremity impaired on one side; - Required substantial to maximal assistance with toilet use, dressing and transfers; - Had a Suprapubic catheter (a catheter which enters the bladder through the lower abdomen; - Occasionally incontinent of bowel; - Had a Stage II pressure ulcer (a partial thickness loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a locked storage area to ensure medications were inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents, when the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. The facility census was 51. Review of policy, storage of medications, undated, showed: -An unattended medication cart must remain locked at all times. In the event the nurse is distracted from task of passing medications by some unforeseen occurrence, the cart must be locked before leaving it, or secured in a locked medication room. Observation on the C hall used as the COVID isolation unit, on 11/30/23 at 1:02 P.M., showed the medication cart lock was sticking out from medication cart and the drawers were not locked. No facility employees were found on the C wing hall. Five residents were residing on the COVID unit. Observation on the C hall wing, 11/30/23 at 1:15 P.M., showed the regional nurse entered unit and locked the medication cart. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 4:47 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep a clean kitchen, failed to label food when it was opened, failed to temperature check foods, and failed to ensure staff washed their hands when contaminated. The facility census was 51. Review of the facility policy, Sanitizing the three-compartment sink, dated 5/15 showed: -Ensure the sanitizing water is at the appropriate level, is being monitored, documented, and used correction, according to the instruction below: - Fill third compartment of 3-compartment sink with water to the line as indicated on the sink. - Dip test paper into solution and hold for 10 seconds. - Compare color on strip to chart on container (desired reading is 200 ppm) - If not at desired reading, report to dietary services manager immediately. - Document test strip completion on log provided. - Dishes should be submerged in sanitizing solution for 1 to 2 minutes and allowed to air dry. -The sanitizing solution should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 (COVID-19,(an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)), when staff failed to apply personal protective equipment (PPE) upon entering the room and failed to remove PPE when exiting the room of SARS-Covid-19 positive residents (Residents #1 and #2), reused disposable gowns (Residents #1, #2 and #5), did not sanitize hands after applying reused disposable gowns (Resident #5), when used disposable gowns were left hanging in hallway of non-isolation unit (Residents #1 & #2). This affected three of five sampled residents. The facility census was 51. Review of facility policy, COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete entrapment assessments, obtain informed consent and physician orders for use of side rails for three of 15 sampled residents. (Residents #10, #26, and #38). The facility census was 50. Review of the undated facility provided policy regarding physical restraints showed: -Equipment: side rails (bed rails) -Guidelines: assess residents need for use; obtain physician's order. -Side Rails: involve the resident and the resident's representative in planning for side rail use. - The policy did not include direction for staff regarding assessment, obtaining consent or obtaining a physician order. 1. Review of Resident #10 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) dated 7/10/22 showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 0. This indicates severe cognitive deficits. -Extensive assistance with bed mobility (movement of body while in bed), dressing, and personal hygiene. -Dependence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview; the facility failed to prepare and serve foods that were attractive and palatable to residents at or above 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility census was 50. Review of facility Food Temperature's policy, dated May 2015, showed: -Hot food should be at least 120 degrees F when served to the resident. Observation on 10/11/22 at 12:06 P.M. showed: -The hot box (A hot box is an improvised appliance to heat up food) was not plugged in as the hall trays were beginning to be dished up and placed inside to be sent to the Dementia unit. -One tray was sitting on top of the hot box instead of being inside. It was covered with an insolated top with no insolated or heated bottom. Observation on 10/12/22 at 12:31 P.M. showed: -Sample hall tray contained Parmesan chicken with green beans, red bliss potatoes, and dinner roll. -Temperature of chicken 140.5 degrees F; The chicken tasted bland. -Temperature of green beans 116.2 degrees F; no flavor and needed seasoning. -Temperature of red bliss potatoes 106.1 degrees F; no seasoning; and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff cared for residents in a dignified manner, when they failed to ensure that two residents received facial grooming for the removal of unwanted facial hair (Resident #43, and Resident #253) and failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #45) was able to sit at an appropriate sized table height to accommodate independent eating during meals in the main dining. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility's posted Resident Rights policy showed: Each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. All staff activities and interactions with residents must focus on assisting the resident in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth and incorporating the resident's preferences and choices. 1. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 8/24/22 showed: -Diagnosis: Intact cognition, osteoarthritis, diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provided necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents (Resident #12 and #31) out of the sampled thirteen residents when the staff failed to place a hand roll in the contracted hand of one resident to prevent further contractures and failed to apply heel protectors for Resident # 12 and staff failed to apply compression socks every morning before the resident was out of bed for Resident #31. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 7/15/22 showed: -Dementia; -Extensive assistance of two staff members for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses of anemia, heart failure (HF), hypertension (HTN), and cerebral vascular accident with left hemiplegia(CVA-Stroke with partial paralysis), contracture of the left hand (hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain the ability to communicate for one resident (Resident #38) of 15 sampled residents. Facility census was 50. The facility did not provide a policy on communication. 1. Review of Resident #38 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 9/16/22 showed: -BIMS of 14, indicates no cognitive impairment -Hearing highly impaired -No hearing aide -Extensive assistance with bed mobility and dressing. -Dependent on staff for transfers and toilet use. -Limited assistance with personal hygiene. - Diagnosis of heart failure, Diabetes (a disease where the pancreas doesn't produce enough insulin to control the amount of glucose, or sugar,in the blood.),Depression and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD: a group of diseases that cause blocked airflow into the lungs and breathing difficulty) -Resident admitted [DATE] Review of the Care Plan for impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$86,912 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $64,575 — penalty dated 2026-03-11
  • $11,492 — penalty dated 2025-05-07
  • $10,845 — penalty dated 2024-12-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 09/01/2016
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 09/01/2016
LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense36% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 7%Other / private 49%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 36% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$240per resident / day
operating cost
$7,298per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$191per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265354. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next