No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lebanon North Nursing & Rehab

596 Morton Road, Lebanon, MO 65536 · For profit - Individual · 180 certified beds · (417) 532-9173 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (417) 532-9173 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0604) — cited Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)11 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$263,670 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0604), cited Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 11 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $263,670 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-10)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
510 Highway 32 · (417) 532-8700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
588 S Jefferson Ave · (417) 532-9403 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Smitty's0.4 mi
601 S Jefferson Ave · (417) 588-4136 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1076 S Jefferson Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased34.7%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.1%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.9%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.3%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened44.3%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.2%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.1%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table39.6%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.0%63.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.1%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.3%13.7%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
36.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.7%CMS range 38.6–66.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 5.6–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge36.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.45
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
62.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 78.4 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 102 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-23)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

66 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure physician ordered appointments, labs, and procedures were scheduled timely resulting in an ordered mammogram and MRI for one resident (Resident #1) not to be completed for a possible breast cancer diagnosis which delayed treatment options. The facility census was 69. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), were notified on 08/08/23, of the Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy which began on 03/01/23. On 08/01/23, the DON reviewed the resident's chart and began an investigation, educated the employees involved, in-serviced all facility staff, and is monitoring charts daily to ensure ordered appointments are being completed timely. The noncompliance was corrected on 08/04/23. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to scheduling appointments or medical testing. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Transportation Agreements, undated, showed the following information: -The Social Service Department will arrange transportation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    1.Please refer to event ID 1E31E4-H3, exit date 06/05/26, for details. Complaints #2987175 and #2988229.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-02-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical restraint when staff physically restrained one resident (Resident #2) while assisting him/her back to the special care unit by holding the resident's arms behind his/her back resulting in the resident being upset and crying. The facility census was 77.Review of a facility policy titled Resident Rights, undated, showed the following:-It is the intent of the facility to promote and ensure the highest standards of conduct and reliability by its employees and consultants to in turn produce environments in the facility that promote the highest standards of care and security for our residents and families we serve;-The exercise of resident rights shall be free from restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal;-Each resident shall be free from mental and physical abuse;-Residents have the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraint except when used to treat a specified medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to administer medications as ordered, failed to obtain ordered labs in a timely fashion, failed to timely assess and document changes of conditions, and failed to notify the physician of missed medications, out of range labs, and changes of conditions in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #1) who was hospitalized due to his/her change of condition. The facility staff also failed to follow physician orders regarding daily weights, failed to complete fluid restriction monitoring, and failed to update the resident's care plan intervention for one resident (Resident #5) with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF- impaired heart function). The facility census was 70. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding monitoring weights for residents. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief look at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status when staff failed to monitor weight loss, failed to update the care plan with new interventions to prevent future weight loss, and failed to notify the physician and registered dietician (RD) of weight loss for one resident (Resident # 3) who had severe weight loss. The facility census was 70. Review of the facility policy titled Nutritional Risk Interventions, dated May 2015, showed the following:-The individual condition of each resident at nutritional risk must be considered when instituting nutritional intervention;-Unacceptable parameters of nourishment include weight loss, clinical signs and symptoms of malnutrition, and abnormal lab results;-Unplanned weight loss would include: 5% weight loss in one month is significant with greater than 5% being severe; 7.5% weight loss in three months is significant with greater than 7.5% being severe; and 10% weight loss in 6 months is significant with greater than 10% being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and effective pain management program was in place for each resident when staff failed to care plan regarding pain and pain interventions, administer pain medications as ordered, accurately document dosage of pain medication administered, and document follow-up physician notification of unrelieved pain and ordered pain medications not provided for one resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 76. Review of facility policy titled Pain Management, undated, showed the following:-Assess all residents for pain upon admission, quarterly, annually, and as part of daily care;-Use evidence-based age-appropriate pain assessment tools such as the numeric rating scale;-Assess both verbal and nonverbal indicators of pain;-Document detailed pain characteristics to include location, intensity, frequency, onset, duration, and impact on sleep, appetite, and social interactions;-Collaborate with the resident to establish realistic, person-centered pain management goals;-For managing pain, monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from accidents when the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure staff were aware of the care planned needs of each resident resulting in the fall of one resident (Resident #1), resulting in a laceration and neck fracture, when staff provided cares alone when care planned for two staff present during cares. The facility had a census of 80.Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, not dated, showed the following information:-A comprehensive care plan for each resident is to be developed and maintained that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain;-The care plan will be oriented to prevent avoidable decline in functioning and manage risk factors to the extent possible or indicating the limits of such interventions.Review of a facility's checklist form titled, Fall Prevention Intervention Care Plan, dated June 2006, showed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Please refer to event ID26CF12, exit date 07/23/24, for details. MO00239179 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were kept as free from possible accident hazards as possible when the facility staff failed to fully secure one resident (Resident #1) in a wheelchair during transport in the facility's van resulting in a fracture of the resident's leg. The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy and procedure, or a job description, specific to transporting residents in the facility van. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 12/18/19; -Diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and left leg amputation at the hip. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 06/06/24, showed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Please refer to event ID26CF12, exit date 07/23/24, for details. MO00239179 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were kept as free from possible accident hazards as possible when the facility staff failed to fully secure one resident (Resident #1) in a wheelchair during transport in the facility's van resulting in a fracture of the resident's leg. The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy and procedure, or a job description, specific to transporting residents in the facility van. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 12/18/19; -Diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and left leg amputation at the hip. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 06/06/24, showed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were kept as free from possible accident hazards as possible when the facility staff failed to fully secure one resident (Resident #1) in a wheelchair during transport in the facility's van resulting in a fracture of the resident's leg. The facility census was 54. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy and procedure, or a job description, specific to transporting residents in the facility van. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 12/18/19; -Diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and left leg amputation at the hip. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 06/06/24, showed the following information: -Cognitively intact; -Left leg amputation; -Dependent on staff for transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of the undated facility policy Resident Rights showed the following:-Always be provided with the highest level of care and service;-Each resident shall be treated with consideration, respect a full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including care of his/her personal needs.1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information:-admission date of 04/04/25;-Diagnoses included pain in right hip, generalized anxiety disorder, pain in left shoulder, age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture (condition that occurs when severely weakened, low-density bone breaks due to minimal trauma, such as a minor fall, bending, or coughing), insomnia (difficulty falling or staying asleep), pain, unspecified, nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 01/10/26, showed the following information:-Cognitively intact;-Setup or clean-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program for all residents based on comprehensive assessments and care plans when, staff failed to provide an activity program for the 17 residents who lived on the special care unit (SCU - hall with residents who have dementia and are at risk to exit seek reside) and failed to complete comprehensive assessments regarding preferred activities for two residents (Resident #2 and #3). The facility census was 70. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding the activity program. 1. Observations on the SCU throughout the day on 06/03/26, 06/04/26, and 06/05/26, showed no activity calendar posted, no observations of any activity supplies, or activities in the SCU. Observation on 06/05/26, at 8:45 A.M., showed four residents sitting in wheelchairs around the nurses' station in the SCU. The residents were not engaged in any activity or interactions. 2. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (admission information at a glance) showed the following:-admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate the right of self-determination for every resident when staff failed to honor reasonable shower preferences for two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #5). The facility census was 76. Review showed the facility did provide a policy regarding bathing.1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed the following:-admission date of 10/17/25; -Diagnoses include repeated falls, muscle weakness, irregular heartbeat, and heart failure.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool filled out by facility staff), dated 01/23/26, showed the following information:-Cognitively intact;-Required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for bathing, dressing, and mobility.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 01/29/26, showed staff did not care plan regarding bathing preferences and/or assistance level for bathing.Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a comfortable environment when staff failed to address the mattress of one resident (Resident #4) that had a dip in which caused difficulty with position and sleeping, and contributed to the resident's pain. A sample of three residents was selected for review. The facility census was 77.Review of a facility policy titled Pain Management Policy and Procedure, with no date, showed the following information:-The purpose is to establish procedures for identifying, assessing, treating, and monitoring pain in long-term care residents, supporting individualized and effective pain management strategies while promoting safety and regulatory compliance;-Include both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies in the care plan;-Review and update the care plan regularly or as needed;-Document assessment findings, interventions, and resident response. 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following information:-admission date of 04/04/25;-Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff did not report an allegation of staff to resident abuse/restraint involving one resident (Resident #2) to DHSS. The facility census was 77. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure Checklist, revised11/28/16, showed the following:-The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms;-The intent of this requirement is for each resident to attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of physical restraints for discipline or convenience and prohibits the use of physical restraints to unnecessarily inhibit a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible abuse were investigated timely with steps to protect all residents implemented during the investigation when the facility failed to complete a full and documented investigation, including steps taken protect resident during the investigation, of an allegation of staff to resident abuse/restrain involving one resident (Resident #2}). The facility census was 77.Review of the facility's policy Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure Checklist, revised11/28/16, showed the following:-The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms;-The intent of this requirement is for each resident to attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were able to remain in the facility, unless there was documented cause for transfer and proper discharge notice given, when the facility failed to allow one resident (Resident #3) to return to the facility from a hospitalization without re-evaluation by staff or written discharge notice. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy titled Discharge/Transfer of a Resident, undated, showed the following:-The purpose was to provide a safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for aftercare of the resident;-Staff should explain discharge guidelines and reason to resident and give a copy of the Transfer and Discharge Notice as required;-The attending physician is required to write a discharge order;-Ask physician if medications are to be sent to the resident;-Complete a discharge summary and post discharge plan of care that includes a list of medications with instructions and instructions for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to complete timely and complete skin assessments, failed to document accurate wound assessments, failed to obtain and update orders timely, failed to follow physician orders, failed to provide treatment as ordered, and failed to care plan wounds for two residents (Resident # 1 and # 9) of three sampled residents, with a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device). The facility census was 77.x Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care and Treatment, undated, showed the following:-There must be a specific order for the treatment;-Documentation of the treatment should be done immediately after the treatment;-Staff should conduct on going skin assessments with weekly documentation of status;-The care plan should reflect the current status of the wound and appropriate goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #4), when staff failed to notify the nurse and physician of a pattern of missed doses of medications in the morning, when staff failed to try to reapproach the resident for medication administration when the resident had refused, and when staff failed to administer medication per ordered parameters. The facility census was 70.Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, undated, showed the following:-Medications are given to benefit the resident's health as ordered by a physician;-Staff should administer medications and record the medication was given on the medication sheet;-Staff should document a resident's refusal of medication and note the date, time, and what occurred.(The policy did not address steps to take when a resident refused or missed a medication.) 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet showed the following:-admission date of 10/06/21;-Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received specialized rehabilitative services as needed when staff failed to provide a therapy evaluation and therapy services as care planned and ordered for one resident (Resident #4) and when staff failed to document therapy services provided or refused for one resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 76. Review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders, undated, showed the following information:-Physician orders are needed for physical therapy (PT), speech therapy (ST), and occupation therapy (OT) evaluations and therapy; -Therapy orders are to be renewed every 30 days, which may be recorded on the therapy notes.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding providing and documenting physical therapy visits.1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (brief look at resident information) showed the following:-admission date of 10/17/25;-Diagnoses included repeated falls, muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care that reflected the resident's wishes as expressed by the residents advance directives (written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) when the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #1) Do Not Resuscitate order (DNR- refers to a medical order issued by a physician or other authorized practitioner that directs healthcare providers not to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - a medical intervention used to restore circulatory and/or respiratory function)) was clearly and consistently documented in the resident's chart resulting in staff providing CPR when the resident wished to be a DNR. The facility census was 80. Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directive, undated, showed the following information:-Upon admission of a resident to the facility, the social services designee (SSD) will provide written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner, when staff withheld one resident's (Resident #1's) belongings, and would not return them timely, after the resident displayed behaviors. The facility census was 75.Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights, undated, showed the following:-The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to persons and services inside and outside the facility;-The resident has the right to exercise his/her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States;-The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination and reprisal form the facility in exercising his/her rights, and be supported by the facility in the exercise of his/her rights;-The resident may retain personal possessions as space permits, unless to do so would infringe on the rights of others. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report allegations of verbal abuse and involuntary seclusion involving one resident (Resident #1) to management and DHSS in a timely fashion. The facility census was 75.Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised January 2017, showed the following:-Educate all staff to report to the Administrator and/or designees any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property;-The Administrator or designee must report to the State Survey agency no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event involved abuse or resulted in injury;-All residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation;-Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care per professional standards when the facility staff failed to transcribe physician orders for wound care treatment and interventions, failed to notify the physician of changes noncompliance by the resident and changes in the wounds in a timely manner, failed to document wound care, and failed to update the care plan regarding wound care interventions for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation, undated, showed the treatment documentation should include the date and time each treatment was administered, name of person administering the treatment, specific duties performed, reason(s) for a resident's refusal of the treatment, and the signature and title of the person recording the data. The facility did not provide a wound treatment/management policy or a skin assessment policy. 1. Review of the Resident #1's face sheet (brief look at resident information)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records when staff failed to document contacting the physician for catheter orders, failed to document a catheter insertion attempt, failed to document a hospital transfer, and failed to document notification to the family of a change in condition for one resident (Resident # 2). The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation, undated, showed the following: -Treatment documentation should include the date and time each treatment was administered, name of person administering the treatment, specific duties performed, and signature and title of person recording the data; -Intake and output documentation should include consistent and accurate documentation and measurement of the resident's intake and output, each shift's eight-hour total output, other pertinent observations as necessary, and signature and title of person recording the data; -Both intake and output documentation must be recorded when a resident has a catheter, IV, tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and effective infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to ensure staff were educated on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and failed to ensure appropriate protective personal equipment (PPE) was readily available for staff use for one resident (Resident #1) with a catheter (flexible tubing that is used to drain urine from the bladder) and one resident (Resident #2) with a wound. The facility census was 67. Review of the Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms, dated 07/12/22, showed the following: -Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO - microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility promoted each resident's right to self-determination when staff failed to provide bath/showers as preferred for one resident (Resident #1) out of a sample of four residents. The facility had a census of 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bath (Shower), undated, showed the following: -Purpose of the policy was to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness; -Staff to encourage resident to do as much as his/her own care as possible, supervise, and assist as necessary. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bath (Bed), undated, showed the following: -Purpose of policy to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness; -Staff to encourage resident to do as much for himself/herself as possible. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admission date of 04/15/16; -Diagnoses included muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and low back pain. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL -dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) as needed when staff failed to provide timely showers for one resident (Resident #2), who resided in the dementia unit, out of a sample of four residents. The facility census was 76. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bath (Shower), undated, showed the following: -To maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness; -Encourage resident to do as much as his/her own care as possible, supervise, and assist as necessary. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (admission data) showed the following information: -admission date of 06/17/22' -Diagnoses included vascular dementia, depression, and pain. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated, 12/19/24, showed the following information: -Moderately impaired cognitive skills; -Required substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required time two hour frame when one resident (Resident #1), out of six sampled residents, made an allegation of sexual abuse to facility staff. The facility census was 55. Review of the facility's policy titled Reporting, dated 11/28/16, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion; -The Nursing Home Administrator or designee will report abuse to the state agency per State and Federal requirements; -All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources, and misappropriation of resident will be reported immediately but no later than the following timeframes. If abuse is alleged or the allegation results in serious bodily injury, the allegation must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care as ordered and in accordance with standards of practice when staff did not document reasons for wound care not being provided or attempts to re-approach or educate the resident regarding needed wound care for one resident (Resident #49) out of a sample of five residents. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility's policy, titled Physician Orders, undated, showed treatment orders specify what is to be done, location and frequency, and duration of the treatment. Review of the facility's policy, titled Wound Care and Treatment, undated, showed the following: -It is the purpose of the facility to prevent and treat all wounds; -Documentation of the treatment should be done immediately after the treatment. (The policy did not address documentation of resident refusals of treatment or treatment when residents are asleep) 1. Review of Resident #49's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 03/01/24; -Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), muscle weakness, fistula…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours on 05/05/24 and 05/18/24. Review showed the facility did provide a policy regarding RN coverage. 1. Review of the facility's Nurse Monthly Staff Schedule, dated May 2024, showed the following: -There was not an RN scheduled on 05/05/24 and 05/18/24. Review of the Administrator's (who is also an RN) and the Directory of Nursing's (DON) Timecard, dated 01/01/24 to 05/22/24, and review of RN1's Time Card, dated 01/01/24 to 05/21/24, confirmed that no RN worked on 05/05/24 and 05/18/24. During an interview on 05/21/24, at 4:01 P.M., the DON said the facility knew they were out of compliance with this requirement. The DON said the facility employs one RN. During an interview on 05/23/24, at 5:53 P.M., the Minimum Data Assessment Coordinator (MDSC) said she assists with staff scheduling and when the facility advertises, they do not receive applications. During an interview on 05/23/24, at 5:53 P.M., the Administrator confirmed there was no RN coverage for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing group or individual activity program to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of three residents (Resident #15, #32, and #44) of five sampled residents residing on the secure unit. Review of the Facility Activity/Recreational Therapy Manual, dated March 2012, provided by the Administrator, showed the following: -The policy and procedures for the activity program was to plan, organize, and carry out a program of activities to meet individual psychological, social and spiritual needs of each resident; -Individualized program of activity would be implemented for residents unable to participate in or attend activities; -Progress notes should include a resident's response to an activity as active or passive, and the extent of the activity involvement for each resident; -Resident participation should be documented on a daily basis to monitor a resident's attendance, participation, refusal and level of participation that would be utilized to determine changes that may or may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) notification was provided timely for two residents (Residents #49 and #270) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification out of a total sample of 24 residents. 1. Review of Resident #49's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 03/01/24; -Diagnoses included foot drop right foot. Review of the resident's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review, form showed Medicare Part A skilled services start date was 03/01/24 and the last day covered was 03/16/24. Review of the resident's medical record showed staff did not have documentation of a NOMNOC or ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage - Form if the beneficiary intends to continue services and the SNF believes the services may not be covered under Medicare. It is the facility ' s responsibility to inform the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed within 14 days for one resident (Resident #33) out of two residents reviewed for hospice out of a total sample of 24 residents. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2023, showed the following: -A Significant Change in Status Assessments (SCSA) is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home; -The ARD must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election. 1. Review of Resident #33's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 08/18/23; -Diagnoses included unspecified dementia. Review of the resident's Physician Orders, located under the Orders tab in the EMR, dated 08/29/23, showed the resident was admitted to hospice services. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to refer a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) resident who had a negative Level I Preadmission Screen, who was later identified with a new mental disorder diagnosis to the appropriate state designated authority for a Level II PASARR evaluation and determination for one resident (Resident #61) of five residents reviewed for PASARR of 24 sample residents. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to PASARR screening/process. 1. Review of Resident #61's Face Sheet, undated, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the profile tab showed the resident was diagnosed with anxiety disorder on 11/22/23, major depressive disorder on 07/11/24, and with bipolar disorder on 07/23/24. Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/16/24, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing pre and post dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly)communication for a resident receiving dialysis three times a week for one resident (Resident #8) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis out of a total sample of 24 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dialysis, Care of a Resident Receiving Dialysis, undated, showed the following: -All care concerns within the last 24 hours will be addressed, including the last medications given and facility contact person; -The dialysis unit will complete the lower portion of the report to include weight prior to and after dialysis, any labs completed, medication given, follow up information, and any new physician's orders; -The lower portion will be signed by the dialysis nurse and returned to the facility. 1. Review of Resident #8's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was documented clinical rationale for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication orders longer than 14 days for two residents (Resident #6 and #32) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. 1. Review of Resident #6's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 08/18/19; -Diagnoses included mood disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/14/24, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Prescribed psychotropic medication. Review of of the resident's Care Plan, located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, dated 03/14/24, showed psychotropic drug use with intervention in place to complete medication evaluations as ordered. Review of of the resident's Physician Orders, located under the Orders tab in the EMR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #1) that addressed the resident's bathing preference and potential behaviors when showers were given by staff. The facility with a census of 64. Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, undated, showed the following: -The interdisciplinary care plan team, with input from the resident and family, will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; -Assessment of each resident is an ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition; -Assessing and planning for care to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs; -Involving direct care staff with the care planning process relating to the resident's expected outcomes; -The interdisciplinary care plan team is responsible for the periodic review and updating of care plans when a significant change in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed ensure a pain management program was provided to all resident per standards of practice, when staff failed to reorder pain medication timely and failed to administer another pain medication per orders for one resident (Resident #1). A sample of fourteen residents was selected for review in facility with a census of 67. Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Orders, undated, showed the following information: -Current lists of orders must be maintained in the clinical record on each resident to avoid confusion and errors; -Physician orders must be reviewed and renewed; -Medication orders specify the type, route, dosage, frequency, and strength of the medication ordered. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, undated, showed medications are given to benefit a resident's health as ordered by the physician. Review of the facility's policy titled Medications, Errors, and Drug Reactions, undated, showed staff to report all medication errors and adverse drug reactions immediately to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of possible abuse was reported immediately to management and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff received allegation of possible abuse involving one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 69. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure Checklist, dated 11/28/16, showed the following: -The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms; -In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of possible abuse was thoroughly and timely investigated, and steps were immediately taken to protect all residents, when a staff member received an allegation of possible abuse regarding one staff member (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B and one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 69. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure Checklist, dated 11/28/16, showed the following: -The facility must take the following actions in response to an alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment: -Thoroughly investigate the alleged violation; -Prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment from occurring while the investigation is in progress;and -Take appropriate corrective action, as a result of investigation findings. -The facility must have evidence of a thorough investigation including resident statements, witness statements, staff statements, environmental review, resident physical assessment, including a timeline of events;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative with a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) when all covered Medicare services were ending for three residents (Resident #132, #133, and #134), who discharged home from the facility after Medicare services ended. The facility census was 81. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following information: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC, form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete criminal background checks, employee disqualification list (EDL- a list maintained of individual unable to work in long-term care facilities in Missouri) checks, and/or Nurse Aide (NA) registry (a registry that indicated a list of individuals who had a previous incident involving abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property that would prevent the employee from working in a certified long-term care facility) checks for a federal indicator prior to starting employment and continued resident contact for four staff. The facility census was 81. Record review of the facility's protocol titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated November 2016, showed the following: -It is the purpose of this facility to prohibit mistreatment, neglect, abuse, misappropriation of resident's property, and exploitation of any resident; -To assure that everything possible is being done to prevent abuse, the facility has implemented screening of potential employees; -The facility must not hire an employee who was found guilty of abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure care was completed in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to complete ordered labs for three residents (Resident #11, #15, and #50) and facility failed to follow physician's orders for thickened liquids for one resident (Resident #64) with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The facility census was 81. 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 1/26/19; -Diagnoses included adult failure to thrive (a general decline in mental and physical health due to complex reasons), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a type of lung disease which makes it difficult to breathe, even when at rest), chronic pain, and anxiety; -Receiving hospice services since 2/22/22. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-26 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee meetings, staff that attended the meeting, and the issues addressed. The facility census was 81. Record review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding their QAA committee. 1. Record review of the facility's QAA/QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) Manual, showed the following: -QAPI meeting minutes, dated 05/04/22, with the subject identified as Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility staff) completion/compliance. Signatures of staff attending the meeting did not include the medical director (a required member of the QAA committee); -Staff did not document any other dates of QAA/QAPI committee meeting. During interviews on 08/22/22, at 8:53 A.M., on 8/23/22, at 10:37 A.M., and on 8/25/22, at 1:56 P.M., the Administrator the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for QAA/QAPI and had all the documentation on the QAA/QAPI; -The Administrator said she could only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy when staff failed to complete the first step of employee tuberculosis (TB - a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) screening tests prior to resident contact for three staff and failed to complete the second step of the the employee TB screening test for three staff members. The facility census was 81. Record review of the facility's policy, Tuberculosis Control, undated, showed the following information: -Provide a tuberculin skin test (Mantoux - five tuberculin units of purified protein derivative (PPD)) to all employees during the pre-employment procedures, unless a previous reaction greater than 10 mm (millimeters) is documented. If the initial skin test result is 0 to 9 mm, a second test should be given at least one week later and no more than three weeks after the first test; -All employees will be screened for TB; -All PPDs will be documented on the Employee Immunization record including new hires and annual administration. After the PPD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident #81) in a facility with a census of 81. 1. Record review of the resident's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 7/25/22; -Diagnoses included anemia (low iron levels in the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus (group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose)), chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia (a disorder affecting a person's ability to think, clear, and behave clearly), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Record review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 7/29/22, showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Independent with most activities of daily living, except required supervision with meals and showers; -Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and took a diuretic (water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #81) in a facility with a census of 81. Record review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, showed the following: -The interdisciplinary care plan team, with input from the resident and family, will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; -The resident's comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment. 1. Record review of the resident's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 7/25/22; -Diagnoses included anemia (low iron levels in the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus (group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose)), chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia (a disorder affecting a person's ability to think, clear, and behave clearly), major depressive disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-26 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to take steps to ensure one resident's (Resident #27's) code status change to do not resuscitate (DNR - a medical order issued by a physician or other authorized non-physician practitioner that directs healthcare providers not to administer CPR (any medical intervention used to restore circulatory and/or respiratory function that has ceased) in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) was reviewed and signed by the physician and family in a timely fashion. The facility census was 81. Record review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directive, undated, showed the following: -The facility will respect the advance directives in accordance with state law; -Upon admission of a resident to the facility, the social services designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident # 34) with restorative therapy as recommended by the physical and occupational therapists and as ordered by the physician. The facility census was 81. Record review of the facility's restorative nursing (RNA) program policy,undated, showed the following: -The restorative nursing program is an integral part of maximizing the daily restorative care process for the residents; -The RNA program is a part of the logical step-down process in resident care; -A pro-active approach is necessary to prevent future negative outcomes; -It is the purpose of this facility to see that each resident receives and the facility provides the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan or care; -It is the entire staff's responsibility to prevent deterioration and further functional loss of each resident in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment when staff failed to clean bathroom and resident room floors. The facility census was 101. 1. Record review of the resident council minutes, dated 5/31/19, 6/25/19, and 7/31/19, showed the following information: -On 5/31/19, resident council minutes showed the following concerns: extra attention in the bathroom needed. Staff mop and potentially leave a residue. The facility response showed for staff to check the residents' rooms periodically for this occurrence and relay this to the vendors in case it is a chemical reaction; -On 6/25/19, resident council minutes showed the following concerns: Staff are not sweeping or mopping under the residents' beds and the floor. The facility response showed housekeeping inservice and all staff to assist in ensuring the rooms are clean. Housekeeping supervisor to make rounds daily; -On 7/31/19, resident council minutes showed the following concerns: housekeeping staff are not cleaning under the residents' beds, bathroom odors and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep non-food contact surfaces in the kitchen clean and sanitary. The facility census was 101. Record review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed the following information: -Physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean; -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of any accumulations of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. Record review of the facility's policy from the Nutrition and Dining Services Manual, dated April 8, 2011, for cleaning the floors, cleaning refrigerators and walls, cleaning dishwashing area, handling clean equipment showed direction for the staff to do the following: -Remove all mobile equipment from the area being mopped; -Sweep the floor, pushing all debris forward, using dustpan to remove debris; -Prepare detergent solution according to the manufacturer's instructions (a two compartment mop bucket with a mop press is prepared); -Mop one small area at a time, beginning at the rear of the room in a figure eight motion. Use a scraper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control system to control the flies for three residents (Resident #77, #96 and #250). The facility census was 101. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, dated 3/2015, showed the following information: -To provide an environment free of pests; -The facility will have a pest control contract which provides frequency treatment of the environment for pests. It will allow for additional visits when a problem is detected; -Monitoring the environment will be done by the facility's staff; -Pest control problems will be reported promptly. 1. Record review of Resident #77's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 6/26/19, showed the following information: -Cognitive skills intact; -Diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and manic depression (bipolar disease); -Extensive assistance required with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to document a complete assessment of a newly identified pressure ulcer, failed to timely obtain treatment orders for a newly identified pressure ulcer, and failed timely and consistently implement pressure-relieving interventions for one resident (Resident #96). The facility also failed to consistently implement pressure-relieving interventions, failed to perform wound care per acceptable infection control standards, and failed to follow physician's orders for wound care for one resident (Resident #77) who had a history of chronic pressure ulcers in a selected sample of 29 residents. The facility's census was 101. Record review of the facility's Wound Care and Treatment Nursing Guidelines, dated July 2015, included the following information: -It is the purpose of this facility to prevent and treat all wounds; -Care is taken to prevent contamination of the supplies and the surfaces used in wound care; -If the resident is soiled, cleaning of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders in a timely manner for one resident's (Resident #65's) urinary (Foley) catheter care and treatment. A sample of 29 residents were selected for review in a facility with a census of 101. Record review of the facility's (undated) indwelling catheter care/change procedure, showed the following information: -The purpose of the procedure is to prevent infection and provide continuous drainage of the urinary bladder; -Equipment needed included a physician's order for catheter change; -For removal of the indwelling catheter, staff should check the physician's order for the changing of the catheter. 1. Record review of Resident #65's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 6/06/19, showed the following information: -admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital; -Cognitively intact; -Did not reject cares; -Required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication with the dialysis (the cleaning of the blood with a machine due to the kidneys not working) center and failed to document the thrill/bruit (a vibrating sensation that can be felt) sensation for one resident (Resident #74) who received dialysis out of a sample of 29 residents selected for review in a facility with a census of 101. Record review of the facility's Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, titled, Care of a Resident Receiving Dialysis, showed the following information: -To utilize the following guidelines to provide care for a resident that is receiving dialysis; -Care for the AV (arteriovenous) shunt/fistula/graft: -Keep the area clean and dry; -Feel for the thrill sensation daily; -Inspect the access for redness, swelling or warmth; -Watch for bleeding after dialysis; -Watch for signs of infection; -Checking the thrill sensation: Nurses will check the thrill daily and document daily. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$263,670 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $238,825 — penalty dated 2026-02-10
  • $24,845 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-23 for 74 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/01/2014
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/01/2014
FLEETWOOD, ELAINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/25/2022
LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2014

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-27.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 3%Other / private 20%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$245per resident / day
operating cost
$7,453per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$193per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265123. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next