No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

505 West Evergreen, Strafford, MO 65757 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (417) 736-9332 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$52,456 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $52,456 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-18)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3000 E Division St · (417) 869-8000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
106 E Pine St · (417) 736-2698 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
421 E Old Route 66 · (417) 736-2100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
405 N Airport Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.4%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.2%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.9%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.7%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.9%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.6%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.8%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.1%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine14.3%63.5%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.5–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
82.3%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 66.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-21)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when two staff (Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) E and Certified Medication Technician (CMT) F) physically forced one resident (Resident #1) to shower against his/her wishes- resulting in the resident yelling out for help, fighting against the aides, receiving bruises on both the right and left hand/wrist, and voicing he/she was upset. The facility census was 72. The Assistant Administrator and the Administrator were notified on 10/29/24, at 4:05 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 10/26/24. The IJ was removed on 10/31/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, showed the following: -The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure all meals met the nutritional needs of residents when staff failed to follow approved menus, including appropriate serving sizes, for all residents including two residents (Resident #3 and #4) who stated portion sizes were not sufficient. The facility census was 62. Review of the facility's policy titled, Standardized Recipes, undated showed the following:-Standardized recipes will be used for all menu items;-The registered dietician will approve recipe changes or new recipes utilized for a menu item.Review of the facility's policy titled, Diet Spreadsheet, Portion Serving Communication Tool, undated , showed the following:-Diet spreadsheets or similar meals and portion serving communication tools are available to the serving staff for reference and serving guidance;-Diet spreadsheets are based on the planned menu and reflect serving portions for regular and therapeutic diet orders offered in the community;-Diet spreadsheets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to self-determination through support of resident choice when the facility failed to honor the reasonable shower preferences for four residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, and #6). The facility census was 62.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy on showers.1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following information:-admission date of 02/10/25;-Diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), heart disease, type II diabetes (body develops insulin resistance and fails to use insulin properly), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (constriction of the airways and difficulty breathing), and major depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness). Review of the resident's shower sheets, titled bathing for February 2026 showed the following:-On 02/05/26, six days after the last shower, the resident received a shower;-On 02/09/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents' right to be treated with dignity and respect when one staff member (Registered Nurse (RN) F) insisted one resident (Resident #2) to be placed in a wheelchair and moved against his/her wishes. Seven residents were sampled in the facility with a census of 62. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights Policy, dated December 2024, showed the following:-Each resident residing in this community has the right and will be afforded the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the community without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal;-It is the responsibility of all who work in this community, including employees of the community and any others who provide services to the residents of the community, to advocate and protect the rights of each resident;-All staff members are trained on the Resident Rights policy at the time of employment, prior to providing care to residents, and at least annually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs when staff failed to follow up on and order a customized wheelchair for one resident (Resident #5), which would increase his/her ability to get out of bed and stay out of bed longer. The facility census was 62.Review of a facility policy titled Durable Medical Equipment Manual, dated 04/08/25, showed the following information:-The health plan is financially responsible for custom and power wheelchairs that have been prior authorized by the health plan prior to the enrollment effective date in the fee for service (FFS) program, but placement occurs after the effective date of FFS program enrollment;-Durable medical equipment (DME) is not covered for those participants in a nursing home. DME is included in the nursing home per diem rate and not paid for separately with the exception of custom and power wheelchairs;-Missouri HealthNet Division (MHD) requires all providers of custom and wheelchairs provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #8) or the resident's representative with notice regarding a room change, including the reason for the room change, before the facility moved the resident to another room. The facility's census was 62.1. Review of Resident #8's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following information:-admission date of 05/16/25;-Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (a condition where plaque builds up in the heart's arteries and restricts blood flow), high blood pressure, dementia (a progressive decline in memory and thinking), anxiety (excessive uncontrollable fear), and age-related cognitive decline.Review of Resident #8's care plan, dated 5/19/25, showed the resident preferred to have his/her family involved in care discussions.Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 3/20/26, showed the following:-Severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when staff failed to properly and frequently clean the floor in a resident room for two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #9) resulting the floor being sticky The facility census was 62.1. Review of Resident #5's face sheet (brief information sheet about the resident) showed the following information:-admission date of 01/16/25;-Diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness or inability to move one side of the body) following a stroke affecting the left side, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the Resident #5's care plan, last revised 01/08/26, showed the following:-Had hemiplegia/hemiparesis related to a stroke;-Dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation, and social interaction.Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 03/16/26, showed the following:-Cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide wound care per standards of practice when staff failed to obtain physician ordered wound treatment supplies and failed to complete dressing changes as ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #7's) amputation site and left ankle pressure ulcer (refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 62.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding physician's orders.Review showed the facility did not provide a wound care treatment and management policy.Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin Identification, Evaluation, and Monitoring Policy, dated 01/25, showed the following information:-Complete a weekly skin check to evaluate for changes in skin integrity;-Document in the medical record the following findings: appearance of wound, including measurements if the wound is due for a treatment change. If not, access the dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed maintain an effective pest control system when were present in one resident's (Resident #6) room. The facility census was 62.Review showed the facility did not provide a pest control policy. 1. Review of a pest control invoice, dated 12/12/25, showed the following:-General pest control maintenance;-Scion insecticide treatment applied to the interior perimeter of the building for the aid and control of occasional invaders;-Mouse caught in snap trap by the refrigerator in the employee breakroom;-Spoke with staff who had no other pest concerns at this time of service;-Call with any concerns between now and next visit. Review of a pest control invoice, dated 01/16/26, showed the following:-General pest control maintenance for rodents;-Treatment applied to interior perimeter of the building and all accessible areas for the aid and control of occasional invaders, ants, roaches, crickets, and beetles;-Serviced, cleaned, and reset all interior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident representatives were notified of changes in condition in a timely manner when staff failed to inform one resident's (Resident #2) representative of falls resulting in bruising and skin tears. The facility census was 66.Review of the facility policy entitled Significant Condition Change and Notification, dated 12/24, showed the following:-Purpose is to ensure that the resident's family and/or representative and medical practitioner are notified of resident changes;-Examples of changes include new wounds, bruises or skin tears, head trauma, and mobility changes;-Licensed nurse will contact the resident's representative and medical practitioner;-Calls will be made until the residents' representative is reached;-Each attempt will be charted as to what time the call was made, who was spoken to, and what information was given.1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice for all residents when staff failed to follow physician orders to obtain an x-ray and failed to follow-up regarding completion of the orders for x-rays for one resident (Resident #1) after a fall. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility policy titled, Test Results, dated 01/2017, showed the following: -Results of laboratory, radiological, and diagnostic tests shall be reported to the facility;-The medical practitioner shall be notified of the results;-The Director of Nursing Services, or nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the medical practitioner of such test results.1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following:-admission date of 09/13/22;-Diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disorder where the body develops insulin resistance, causing high blood sugar levels because cells fail to respond properly to insulin) with hyperglycemia (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two hours timeframe when the facility did not report one resident's (Resident #1) statement of abuse. The facility census was 68.Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, dated November 2025, showed the following:-Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals;-The facility administrator, employee, or agent who is made aware of any allegation of abuse or neglect shall report or cause a report to be made to the mandated state agency per reporting criteria. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of possible abuse were thoroughly investigated in a timely manner and that steps were taken to protect all residents during the investigation when staff failed to document an investigation and steps to protect all resident during the investigation after an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, dated November 2025, showed the following:-Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals;-Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator. The facility administrator will ensure a thorough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to prevent loss of strength and range of motion when staff failed to have a process in place to ensure ordered and care planned restorative services we were provided and documented for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4). The facility had a census of 63. Review of the facility policy, Restorative Nursing Policy and Procedure, undated, showed the following:-It is the policy of the facility to provide restorative nursing which promotes the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible;-Restorative nursing focuses on achieving and/or maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychological function of the resident;-The restorative nurse, restorative nursing assistants, along with interdisciplinary team (IDT), will determine what programs will be initialed for the residents;-Restorative nursing services are provided by Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNA),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and neglect were reported immediately to facility management and to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required two-hour time frame when staff failed to report an allegation of employee to resident abuse of one resident (Resident #1) in a timely manner. The facility census was 62.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and neglect were reported immediately to facility management and to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required two-hour time frame when staff failed to report an allegation of employee to resident abuse of one resident (Resident #1) in a timely manner. The facility census was 62.The Administrator was notified on the morning of 9/15/25, at approximately 10:15 A.M., of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 9/11/25, between 10:00 P.M. and 12:00 A.M. The accused certified nurse aide was suspended on 9/15/24. Staff assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to transcribe new admission orders resulting in one resident (Resident #2) not receiving insulin for six days. The facility census was 62.Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated July 2021, showed the following: -Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system;-Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber.Review of the facility policy titled Medical Errors & Adverse Events, dated December 2024, showed the following: -When medical errors or adverse resident events are identified, the facility will analyze the cause, implement corrective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to privacy was maintained when a staff member posted a photo to social media that showed one resident's face (Resident #1) and private medical information of another resident (Resident #2). The census was 62.Review of the facility's policy named, Social Media, undated, showed the following:-The community recognizes the importance of social media websites as a form of communication in today's society and to a great extent respects the staffs privacy while off-duty. However, when the staff's use violates the facility policies, disrupts operations, interferes with a team members work, is used to harass a team member, creates a hostile work environment or harms the [NAME] and reputation among customers and the community, the facility may need to conduct an investigation and take appropriate corrective action as needed;-Prohibited activity included unauthorized disclosure of resident information on internet sites that violate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder allowing your urine to drain) use and care per standards of practice when staff failed to obtain complete catheter orders for one resident's (Resident #3's ) self-catheterization, including specifications or monitoring. The facility census was 62.Review of the facility's policy, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated 12/24, showed the following:-The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter- associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI);-The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: the date and time that catheter care was given, any problems noted at the catheter-urethral junction during perineal care such as drainage, redness, bleeding, irritation, crusting, or pain; any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure; and if the resident refused the procedure, the reason(s) why, and the intervention taken; Review of the facility's policy, Catheter, Intermittent, dated 12/24, showed the following:-Verify that there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide food in a form to meet each resident's needs when staff failed to thicken all liquids as ordered for one resident (Resident #4). The facility census was 62.Review of the facility's policy Therapeutic diets, undated, showed the following:-Therapeutic diets shall be prescribed by the attending physician. The facility will strive for the fewest possible dietary restrictions;-Mechanically altered diets, as well as diets modified for medical nutritional needs will be considered therapeutic diets;-A therapeutic diet must be prescribed by the resident's attending physician. The physicians diet order must match the terminology used by food services. 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following:-admission date 12/20/24;-Diagnoses included gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (a condition where stomach contents flow back into the esophagus (food pipe) but do not cause inflammation of the esophagus).Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for each resident when staff failed to fully document regarding a wound and treatments, including a wound VAC (a medical device that uses negative pressure to remove drainage from wounds and promote healing), for one resident (Resident #3) who admitted with the wound. The facility census was 62.Review of the facility's policy, Skin Identification, Evaluation, and Monitoring Policy, dated 01/25, showed the following:-The purpose of this policy is to outline a method of identification, evaluation, and monitoring for alterations in skin integrity. Communities will implement preventative measures, and an individualized care plan will be formulated upon completion of findings;-Review of resident medical record to identify risk factors that have the potential to cause alterations in skin integrity, provide privacy, and explain the purpose of a physical skin evaluation;-A licensed nurse will evaluate skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by staff when one staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C) yelled at and physically forced a resident to receive incontinent care. The facility census was 64. Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated March 2025, showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone; -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. Review of the facility Abuse Investigative Guidelines, dated May 2024, showed the following: -A nursing progress note should be entered after an allegation of abuse; -Nurse progress note should include a description of the situation, who reported, what was reported, involved parties, where it took place, what the allegation is, and could the resident identify the person named in the allegation; -Documentation should be factual and not subjective;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care for all residents per standards of practice when staff failed to obtain and enter wound care orders, failed to document wound care provided, and failed to care plan current wounds and current treatments for three residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 63. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding obtaining, entering, and following treatment/monitoring orders. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 06/20/23; -Diagnoses included dementia (loss of memory), depression, fractured right hip, and muscle weakness. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 11/15/24, showed the following: -Resident had severe cognitive impairment; -Had a pressure reducing device for bed; -At…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of physical abuse were reported immediately to facility management and to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required time frame when staff failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) until the following day. The facility census was 63. Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated December 2024, showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Resident must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other resident, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals; -This presumes that all instances of abuse, even those in a coma, can cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator; -The facility employee who becomes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a timely and thorough investigation, to include interviews with multiple staff and other residents, and steps taken to protect all residents during the investigation for an allegation of possible physical abuse involving one resident (Resident #1). The facility had a census of 63. Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated December 2024, showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Resident must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other resident, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals; -This presumes that all instances of abuse, even those in a coma, can cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; -The facility Administrator will ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of individual rights and document appropriate action; -While a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store refrigerated medications at the medication's recommended temperatures and failed to have a system in place to monitor and adjust the temperature as needed. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated April 2017, showed the following: -Medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturers' recommendations or those of the supplier; -Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 46 degrees F; -The facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day. Review of the Novolog (insulin aspart - rapid acting insulin) package insert, undated, showed the following: -Keep Novolog pen or vial in a cool storage at 36 degrees F to 46 degrees F; -Do not allow insulin to freeze. Review of the Lantus (long acting insulin) package insert, dated June 2023, showed the following: -Store unused Lantus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure all meals met the nutritional needs of residents when staff failed to follow approved menus for all residents and failed to provide potatoes, or comparable substitute, at a meal for all residents. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's policy titled, Menu Substitutions or Changes and Approval, undated showed the following: -All substitutions, whether a one-time substitution or a permanent menu change, are recorded using a facility specific document or a menu substitution form. The registered dietician periodically reviews the documented menu substitutions or menu changes for nutritional equivalency and appropriateness; -When making a one-time substitution or permanent menu change, the replacement food item is of the same nutritional equivalency as the item being substituted. 1. Review of the facility menu, dated 04/16/25, showed ham and beans, American fried potatoes, country cabbage, cornbread, and pears to be prepared and served. Observation on 04/16/25, at 12:07 P.M., of the menu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards when staff failed to use effective hair restraints; failed to consistently label and date food; and failed to properly close frozen foods to prevent freezer burn; failed to cover foods in the refrigerator being stored under fan with lint and black substance. The facility census was 61. 1. Review of the 2013 Food Code, issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), showed food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles. Review of the facility's policy titled Hair Restraints, undated, showed the following: -Hair restraints shall be worn by all dining services staff when in food production, dishwashing areas, or when serving food from the steam table; -Hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan that demonstrated identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events, and documentation that demonstrated the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities The facility census was 61. 1. Review of facility policy titled QAPI Policy, updated January 2024, showed the following: -The program would monitor quality and performance, find opportunities for improvement, and meet regulatory requirements; -The QAPI program consists of monthly/quarterly meetings, daily quality assurance activities, and performance improvement plans. Review of facility records showed the following: -The facility's last documentation of a QAPI meeting occurred on 12/01/24; -The facility did not have performance improvement plans (PIP's) or evidence of good-faith attempts to correct identified deficient practices for the first quarter of 2025; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the staff failed to implement and maintain an effective infection control program when staff failed to maintain catheters (a tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine) in a manner to prevent the possible introduction bacteria in the system when the catheter bag and tubing for two residents (Resident #24 and #23) were placed or dragged on the ground. The facility also failed to perform proper hand hygiene during medication passes for seven resident (Resident #24, #30, #37, #23, #4, #13, and #50). The facility also failed to have and follow a Legionella (severe form of pneumonia) Water Management Program. The facility census was 61. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, dated December 2024, showed the following: -The purpose of the procedure was to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections; -Use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage system; -Maintain clean technique when handling or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their infection and control policy when staff failed to designate one or more certified staff persons as the infection preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program (ICPC - systematic approach to prevent and control the spread of infections, particularly in healthcare settings). The facility census was 61. Review of the facility policy titled Infection and Control Program, undated, showed the following: -The facility maintains an organized, effective facility-wide program designed to systematically identify and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among residents, visitors and healthcare workers; -Ultimate responsibility for overseeing and implementing the infection prevention and control program is delegated to the Quality Assurance Committee; -The committee membership included but may not be limited to the medical director, administrator, nursing, and infection preventionist (IP); -The IP responsibilities for infection prevention and control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement their abuse and neglect prevention policies, when the facility failed to maintain documentation of completed criminal background checks (CBC), employee disqualification list (EDL - a list of individual prohibited from working in a long-term care facility in Missouri due to a finding of abuse or neglect) checks, and Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (list that indicates if an individual has a Federal Indicator (a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) prohibiting them from working in a certified facility) check. The facility census was 61. Review of facility provided policy, dated December 2024, titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other resident, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to report allegations of possible resident abuse immediately to management and within in two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) for an allegations involving three residents (Resident #32, #50 and #29). The facility had a census of 61. Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, , dated December 2024,, showed the following: -Each resident had the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Resident must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other resident, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals; -This facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents; -This presumes that all instances of abuse, even those in a coma, can cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an immediate investigation for all allegations of abuse and failed to take immediate steps to protect all residents after receiving allegations of abuse involving three residents (Resident #32, #50 and #29). The facility had a census of 61. Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy. dated December 2024, showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion; -Resident must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other resident, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals; -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents; -This presumes that all instances of abuse, even those in a coma, can cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; -The facility's abuse prohibition program included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify residents and the resident's representative in writing of a transfer to a hospital that included the reason for the transfer, date of transfer, and destination of transfer when staff failed to provide the written notification to five residents (Resident #31, #48, #15, #21, and #23) and their representative. A sample of 21 residents were in the facility with a census of 61. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding transfer notices. 1. Review of Resident #'31's face sheet (resident's information at a quick glance) showed an admission date of 11/19/21. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) showed the following: -On 02/08/25, the resident was discharged with return anticipated; -On 02/13/25, entry tracking record showed resident had hospital stay and returned. Review of the resident's February 2025 progress notes showed the following: -On 02/8/25, at 1:54 P.M., the resident has had multiple bright red bloody bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed-hold policy information to every resident or resident representative at transfer when staff failed to provide written bed-hold policy information to five residents (Resident #31, #48, #21, #23, and #15) or their resident representative when the residents were transferred to the hospital. A sampled of 21 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 61. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding bed-hold notification. 1. Review of Resident #'31's face sheet (resident's information at a quick glance) showed an admission date of 11/19/21. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) showed the following: -On 02/08/25, the resident was discharged with return anticipated; -On 02/13/25, entry tracking record showed resident had hospital stay and returned. Review of the resident's February 2025 progress notes showed the following: -On 02/8/25, at 1:54 P.M., the resident has had multiple bright red bloody…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was free of accident hazards when the resident accessible hot water temperatures in four resident's (Resident #41, #48, #54, and #39) rooms measured greater than 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility census was 61. Review of the American Burn Association website, updated 2002, showed hot water caused third degree burns (full thickness burns which go through the skin and affect deeper tissue resulting in white or blackened, charred skin) at the following temperatures and time parameters: -In 1 second at 156 degrees F; -In 2 seconds at 149 degrees F; -In 5 seconds at 140 degrees F; -In 15 seconds at 133 degrees F; -In 1 minute at 127 degrees F. -Older adults, like young children, have thinner skin so hot liquids cause deeper burns with even brief exposure. Their ability to feel heat may be decreased due to certain medical conditions or medications so they may not realize water is too hot until injury has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a side or bed rail evaluation form, to include a risk/benefit review and alternatives attempted prior to the use of side or bed rails; failed to document ongoing evaluations; failed to complete a side or bed rail safety check with regular inspections of the bed frame and side or bed rail for risk of entrapment; failed to obtain orders for side or bed rail use; and failed to develop care plan interventions and approaches for side or bed rails for five residents (Resident #21, #23, #43, #8, and #44) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Rails, approved December 2024, showed the following: -Prior to the installation of bed rails, attempts to provide the residents with alternative measures to meet their need for positions, mobility, or transfer ability while in bed will be made; -When alternatives are deemed ineffective or not adequate to meet the resident's needs, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective and complete infection control program when staff failed to implement a complete antibiotic stewardship program (coordinated effort, often within a healthcare setting, to improve the appropriate use of antibiotics) when staff failed to track residents on antibiotics for various infections in the facility by not completing a current and ongoing antibiotic log of residents with active infections. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility policy titled Antimicrobial Stewardship Playbook for Long-Term Care Facilities, undated, showed the following: -Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) is the process for ensuring optimal antimicrobial use during patient or resident care; -Optimal antimicrobial use can be assessed by using the 5 D' of AD: diagnosis, drug, dose, duration and de-esculation; -The goal of AS is not to simply decrease antimicrobial usage within a facility, but to decrease inappropriate antimicrobial use within a facility; -Anyone involved with care of the resident can help perform AS. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a sanitary and comfortable fashion when the floors in the kitchen had black and white substances present as well as debris under the sink. The facility census is 61. Review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed the following: -Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues; -The physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy for the cleanliness of the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's weekly cleaning schedule, undated, showed all staff were responsible for sweeping and mopping the kitchen daily. Observations on 04/15/25, beginning at 9:18 A.M., showed the floors in the kitchen had black and some white substance throughout the kitchen. It was especially dirty under the three compartment sink and up against the walls. Some debris was also located behind the tables against the walls. Observations on 04/17/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to refer a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) resident who had a negative Level I Preadmission Screen, who was later identified with a new mental disorder diagnosis to the appropriate state designated authority for a Level II PASARR evaluation and determination for one resident (Resident #54) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility also failed to update the resident's care plan to reflect the new diagnosis and interventions. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility census was 61. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding PASARR requirements. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning, undated, showed the following: -Every resident would be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI); -Use this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with standard of practice when staff failed to timely report obtained laboratory results to the physician causing a delay of care for one resident (Resident #310) who presented with a change in condition. The facility's census was 61. Review showed the facility did not provide a change of condition policy. 1. Review of Resident #310's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admission date of 04/02/25; -Diagnoses included acute diastolic heat failure (a type of heart failure), depression, venous insufficiency (veins in the legs are damaged), and fracture of the humerus (upper arm bone). Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 06/10/25, showed the following: -Cognitive skills intact; -Required partial to moderate assistance for bed mobility and transfers; -Used a wheelchair; -Indwelling catheter (tube that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice when staff failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of and complete a care plan for the use of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure - a machine that uses air pressure to keep airways open while a resident sleeps) for one resident (Resident #37) and when the facility failed to document refusal of oxygen use and contact supervisory staff and a medical practitioner when one resident (Resident #23) refused to wear oxygen as ordered. The facility census was 61. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure - a breathing machine that delivers air pressure to the lungs through a mask) Support, dated December 2024, showed the following: -Review the resident's medical record to determine his/her baseline oxygen saturation; -Review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow and the pressure setting for the machine;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pain management program was in place for all residents when staff failed to care plan resident pain and interventions related to pain and failed to administer pain medication as ordered for one resident (Resident #50)resulting in increased pain for the resident. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration Policy for Senior Living, undated, showed the following: -Adherence to the Medication Administration Policy was essential to ensure the well-being and safety of the residents; -All staff members were expected to follow the guideline strictly and report any issues or deviations from the policy; -The policy applied to all staff members involved in administration of medication, including nurses, and any other designated personnel who were certified or licensed to pass medications; -Any errors, omissions, or incidents related to medication administration must be documented in the clinical record and reported as per facility protocol; -Regular audits and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Please refer to event ID P16012, exit date 02/06/25, for details. MO00248905 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pain management program was provided to each resident when staff failed to maintain a supply of ordered pain medications and access to emergency use medications resulting in three residents (Resident #7, #8, and #9) not receiving pain medications as ordered. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication, Administration Guidelines, undated, showed it was the purpose of the facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies. 1. Review of Resident #7's face sheet showed the following: -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood efficiently throughout the body), kidney disease, and depression. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Please refer to event ID P16012, exit date 02/06/25, for details. MO00248905 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, please refer to the Statement of Deficiencies, dated 10/18/24. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services to meet the needs of each resident when the facility failed to have ordered medications available for staff administration and failed to have staff access to the emergency medications resulting in seven residents (Resident #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10) not receiving medications as ordered. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication, Administration Guidelines, undated, showed it was the purpose of the facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies. 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet showed the following: -Diagnoses included heart attack, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung disease that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Please refer to event ID P16012, exit date 02/06/25, for details. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff failed to maintain a supply of glucometer (a machine used to test blood sugar) test strips for resident use and as a result nurses were unable to perform physician ordered blood sugar checks and subsequently did not administer insulin as ordered to the three residents (Resident #3, #4, and #6 ). The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated December 2016, showed the following: -Check physician's order for blood sugar testing; -Glucometer testing is conducted a maximum of one hour prior to administration of insulin; -Insulin should not be administered until accurate glucometer results obtained, for the best interest of the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication, Administration Guidelines, undated, showed it was the purpose of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner when a staff member moved one resident (Resident #1) by pulling him/her across the floor by his/her feet while the resident laid on the floor. The facility census was 64. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident's Rights, undated, showed residents shall be treated with consideration and respect, with full recognition of their dignity and individuality. 1. Review of Resident #'1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 04/13/22; -Diagnoses included bipolar disorder (mental condition marked by alternating periods of elation and depression), anxiety disorder (causes excessive feelings of fear, dread, worry that persist over time), dementia with behavioral disturbances (loss of memory and behaviors), cerebrovascular disease (affects blood flow to the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), and metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported within two hours to the State Survey Agency (SSA - Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS)) when staff did not report an allegation of possible abuse received from a staff member regarding two staff (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E and Certified Medication Technician (CMT) F) forcing one resident (Resident #1) to shower against his/her wishes. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, showed the following: -The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not to treat the residents medical symptoms. -It is the policy of the facility that abuse allegations (abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skills necessary to care for residents, when one facility staff member (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C) continued to work as a nurse in the facility after his/her nurse license was no longer valid in the State of Missouri. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility policy/protocol titled, Screening, undated, showed: -It is the policy of the facility to screen employees and volunteers prior to working with residents. Screening components include verification of references, certification and verification of license and criminal background check; -The facility will not hire an employee or engage an individual who was found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, or misappropriation of property by a court of law, or who has a finding in the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of resident property when the facility could not account for all resident medication, while in the medications were in the possession of the facility staff, for four residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4). The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, dated 11/28/2016, showed the following: -The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms; -Ensure that all allegations violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately, but no later that 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the event that cause the allegation involve abuse (all allegations of abuse are reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pain management program was provided to each resident when staff failed to maintain a supply of ordered pain medications and access to emergency use medications resulting in three residents (Resident #7, #8, and #9) not receiving pain medications as ordered. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication, Administration Guidelines, undated, showed it was the purpose of the facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies. 1. Review of Resident #7's face sheet showed the following: -Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood efficiently throughout the body), kidney disease, and depression. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 01/21/25, showed the following: -Moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to to have pharmacy services in place to ensure a consistent counting and reconciliation of controlled substances when staff failed to consistently document the number of medication packages and when staff failed to consistently initial the change of shift controlled medication count on the controlled substance shift change log located in four of four medication carts in the facility. The facility census was 68. 1. Review of the October 2024 Controlled Substance Shift Change Log, for the Alzheimer's unit medication cart, showed the following: -Every shift, 6:30 A.M., 2:30 P.M., and 10:30 P.M., staff to initial oncoming and off going counts and list the total number of medication packages; -On 10/02/24, 10/03/24, and 10/04/24, at 10:30 P.M., the oncoming staff failed to initial the count; -On 10/05/24, at 6:30 A.M., the off going staff failed to initial the count; -On 10/06/24, at 6:30 A.M., staff failed to document the number of medication packages and the oncoming staff failed to initial the count; -On 10/06/24, at 2:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff failed to maintain a supply of glucometer (a machine used to test blood sugar) test strips for resident use and as a result nurses were unable to perform physician ordered blood sugar checks and subsequently did not administer insulin as ordered to the three residents (Resident #3, #4, and #6 ). The facility census was 57. Review of the facility's policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring, dated December 2016, showed the following: -Check physician's order for blood sugar testing; -Glucometer testing is conducted a maximum of one hour prior to administration of insulin; -Insulin should not be administered until accurate glucometer results obtained, for the best interest of the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication, Administration Guidelines, undated, showed it was the purpose of the facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received care per standards of practice when staff failed to administer antibiotics for a food infection timely, failed to routinely monitor the wound dressing follow toe amputation, and failed follow-up with the physician/surgeon when the wound dressing became saturated for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 68. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Examination and Assessment, undated, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to examine and assess the resident for any abnormalities in health status; -Notify the physician or any abnormalities such as, but not limited to abnormal vital signs, labored in breathing, changed in cognitive, behavioral, or neurological status from baseline, wounds or rashes on the resident's skin, worsening pain, as reported by the resident; -Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. 1. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care and monitoring consistent with standards of practice when when staff did not document complete pressure ulcer wound assessments, when staff did not obtain physician orders to treat pressure ulcers on the resident's left buttocks, and when staff did not obtain timely orders to treat pressure ulcers on the resident's right buttocks for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 68. Review of the facility policy titled, Wound Protocol, dated 2018, showed, in part, the following: -Use care when removing dressings and tapes to avoid damage to fragile skin; -Thoroughly document all wound information such as type, location, stage (if applicable), length, width, depth, drainage, notation of tunneling or undermining, description of tissue (necrotic, granulating, etc.) state of peri-wound area, treatment of wound, etc.; -Notify appropriate personnel of all new pressure ulcers, or if you have any questions. 1. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Please see event ID 7LS712, exit date 06/04/24, for citation details. MO00235482 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed notify the physician and resident representative of a fall with injury in a timely fashion for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 70. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Champion Program, not dated, showed the following information: -Staff are to notify the Medical Director, Fall Champion, and Administrator of falls; -Staff are to notify the resident's physician and family/responsible party and document the notification in the fall event. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 03/14/24; -Diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) without behavioral disturbance, adult failure to thrive, reduced mobility, chronic pain, encounter for adjustment and management of a vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Please refer to event ID 7LS712 for citation details. MO00235482 MO00236961 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when the facility failed to complete/document neurological checks (a series of tests that assess mental status, reflexes, and movements) timely after a fall with a head injury, failed to ensure all nursing staff were aware of the fall with injury and fall monitoring, and failed to timely address x-rays results showing a fracture after fall for one resident (Resident #1). The facility also failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to complete an ordered urinalysis (UA) timely and when failed to administer medications to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) as ordered for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 70. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Champion Program, not dated, showed the following information: -The facility is to appoint a Fall Champion to assist in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Please refer to event ID 7LS12, exit date 06/04/24, for citation details. MO00235482 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all records were complete and accurate when staff failed to document regarding x-ray results and transport to the hospital for one resident (Resident #1) following a fall with injury. The facility census was 70. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Champion Program, not dated, showed the following information: -Emergency care is to be provided as needed after a fall; -Staff are to take vital signs and assess condition of the resident; -Staff are to complete post fall follow-up for 72 hours including assessment, documentation of the resident's condition in progress notes, and neurological checks (a series of tests that assess mental status, reflexes, and movements). 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 03/14/24; -A discharge date of 05/02/24; -Diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect at all times when one staff (Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) B) was spoke in a rude, loud, and disrespectful manner to one resident (Resident #1). The facility had a census of 69. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, not dated and provided as the facility's dignity/respect policy, showed the following guidance: -Any employee or volunteer who becomes aware of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation shall immediately report to the nursing home administrator. (The policy did not address treating residents in a dignified manner.) 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 10/03/23; -Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed notify the physician and resident representative of a fall with injury in a timely fashion for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 70. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Champion Program, not dated, showed the following information: -Staff are to notify the Medical Director, Fall Champion, and Administrator of falls; -Staff are to notify the resident's physician and family/responsible party and document the notification in the fall event. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 03/14/24; -Diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) without behavioral disturbance, adult failure to thrive, reduced mobility, chronic pain, encounter for adjustment and management of a vascular access device, and an irregular heart beat; -The resident had an designated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when the facility failed to complete/document neurological checks (a series of tests that assess mental status, reflexes, and movements) timely after a fall with a head injury, failed to ensure all nursing staff were aware of the fall with injury and fall monitoring, and failed to timely address x-rays results showing a fracture after fall for one resident (Resident #1). The facility also failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to complete an ordered urinalysis (UA) timely and when failed to administer medications to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) as ordered for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 70. 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Champion Program, not dated, showed the following information: -The facility is to appoint a Fall Champion to assist in the oversight and monitoring of the fall prevention program; -Staff are to stay with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all records were complete and accurate when staff failed to document regarding x-ray results and transport to the hospital for one resident (Resident #1) following a fall with injury. The facility census was 70. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Champion Program, not dated, showed the following information: -Emergency care is to be provided as needed after a fall; -Staff are to take vital signs and assess condition of the resident; -Staff are to complete post fall follow-up for 72 hours including assessment, documentation of the resident's condition in progress notes, and neurological checks (a series of tests that assess mental status, reflexes, and movements). 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of 03/14/24; -A discharge date of 05/02/24; -Diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) without behavioral disturbance, adult failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-29 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet monthly per the facility's policy and failed to ensure the medical director or desginee attended at least quarterly for two of five quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, updated 03/21/23 showed the QAA Committee will meet monthly. 1. Review of the QAA sign-in sheets, provided by the facility, showed five meetings were held from 07/2022 to 05/09/2023 and three of the five meetings a physician did not attend. -On 07/19/22, there was no physician signature. -On 09/13/22, there was no physician signature. The physician's signature line included a note via email. -On 01/19/23, there was no physician signature. -On 03/21/23, the physician attended by telephone. -On 05/09/23, the physician attended. During an interview on 06/29/23, at 4:08 P.M., the Administrator said he started his employment at the facility in November of 2022 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool used by facility staff) assessment for three residents (Resident #8, Resident #21, and Resident #38) of 20 residents sampled for MDS accuracy. This had the potential for resident care and services to be delayed, and residents not having the chance to achieve their highest practical level of well-being. Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual v1.18.11, draft October 2023, showed the following: -The purpose of the manual is to offer clear guidance about how to use the RAI correctly and effectively to help provide appropriate care; -Clinical competence, observational, interviewing, and critical thinking skills, and assessment expertise from all disciplines are required to develop individualized care plans; -The RAI helps nursing home staff gather definitive information on a resident's strengths, and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan. It also assists staff with evaluating goal achievement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven residents (Resident #7, #8, #25, #38, #43, #47, and #65) of 20 residents sampled for individualized comprehensive care plans, had care plans and approaches individualized to their specific diagnoses and care needs. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, undated, showed the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The interdisplinary care plan team with the input from the resident, family, and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; -The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor behavioral symptoms and/or side effects/adverse consequences for five residents (Resident #67, #25, #7, #222, and #65) of seven residents reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychoactive Drug Therapy, dated 4/2006, showed an unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose or for excessive duration, or without adequate monitoring, without adequate indication for use, or in the presence of adverse consequences, which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Review of the psychotropic drug evaluation sheet of the policy included Potential side effects monitored by: [blank]. 1. Review of Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 03/14/23, located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), showed an admission date of 03/08/23. Per the MDS, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #47) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 72 did not develop a pressure ulcer unless their clinical condition showed that it was unavoidable. The resident developed a new, facility-acquired pressure ulcer that was not documented and appropriation notifications completed upon discovery by facility staff. Review of the facility's policy titled, Condition Change, Resident Observing, Recording and Reporting, undated, showed staff to observe, record and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care and Treatment, undated, showed prevention strategies included ongoing skin assessment with weekly documentation status. It is the purpose of this facility to prevent and treat all wounds. 1. Review of Resident #47's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident # 8 and #38) of 28 sampled residents, received physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) per physician orders. 1. Review of Resident #8's Face Sheet, undated, located in the electronic medical record (EMR), showed the following: -admission date of 02/23/22; -readmission date of 07/16/22; -Diagnoses included polyosteoarthritis (joint pain and stiffness), intercostal (rib) pain, muscle weakness, and low back pain. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/31/23, located in the EMR under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab, showed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, indicating severe cognition impairment; required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting; required limited assistance for eating; and did not receive any special treatments,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to four residents (Resident #7, #32, #50, and #60) who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) of grooming and personal hygiene. The facility census was 73. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), dated March 2015, showed the following: -Verbal directions must be clear and concise; repeat directions as needed. Never assume that resident understands what his meant by verbal commands; -Frequent repetition is often necessary, especially with a confused resident. 1. Record review of Resident #60's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission date of 03/27/18; -Diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, idiopathic epilepsy (seizures) and epileptic syndromes with seizures. Record review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication rate of less than five percent when staff failed to administer a fast-acting insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels) timely as directed by the manufacturer for three residents, (Resident # 28, # 30, and # 124) resulting gin five medications errors our of 27 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 18.5 percent. The facility census was 73. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated March 2015, showed the following: -It is the purpose of this facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies; -A current Physician's Drug Reference is available at each nurse's station; -Refer to the Pharmacy Manual for pharmaceutical policies and procedures; -No policy or information noted regarding the timing of administration of insulins was noted in the policy. Record review of the Humalog (name brand of lispro-a fast acting insulin) manufacturer's website showed the following information:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to protect the food from possible contamination when staff failed to dispose of expired food items and failed to ensure potentially hazardous food was maintained at the proper temperature. Staff failed to ensure dishes were cleaned in a manner to protect food from possible contamination when staff used wet dishes and utensils for food service. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 73. 1. Record review of the Missouri Food Code, published 2013, regarding refrigerator food storage, showed the following: -Refrigerated, ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food, prepared and held in a food establishment for more than twenty-four (24) hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold or discarded when held at a temperature of forty-one degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less for a maximum of seven days or when held at a temperature of forty-five degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less for a maximum of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing information in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 61. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding posting of the daily nurse staffing. 1. Observation on 04/16/25, at 3:08 P.M., showed the facility did not post nurse staffing information in a public location accessible to residents and visitors. Observations on 04/17/25, at 09:36 A.M., showed the facility did not post nurse staffing information in a public location accessible to residents and visitors. Observations on 04/21/25, at 10:16 A.M., showed the facility did not post nurse staffing information in a public location accessible to residents and visitors. During an interview on 04/21/25, at 1:55 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the following: -The nurse staffing information should be posted daily; -It's done right after the morning meeting; -He/she was not sure who was supposed to post it. He/she thought the scheduler…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$52,456 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $52,456 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-12 for 84 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/01/2001
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/01/2001
MANESS, BARBARAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/06/2013
BYSOR, BRANDONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/25/2022
STUTTS, CHARLOTTEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/11/2011
DRAKE, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/25/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 2%Other / private 33%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$207per resident / day
operating cost
$6,293per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$198per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265656. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next