No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rocky Ridge Manor

3111 Highway A, Mansfield, MO 65704 · For profit - Individual · 65 certified beds · (417) 924-8116 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
601 N Busch Ave · (417) 926-6643 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
101 N Business 60 · (417) 924-8877 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
305 E Commercial St · (417) 924-3410 · Call to confirm hours
Park
320 W Church St · (417) 746-0041 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2031 US Highway 150

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.2%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.6%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.3%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.3%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.7%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.6%23.5%17.1%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-12)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents right to be free from sexual abuse by other residents when staff failed to care plan and implement new interventions when one resident (Resident #1) exhibited sexually abusive behaviors towards two residents (Resident #2, Resident #3) and sexually verbal behaviors toward one resident (Resident #4). The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised 11/28/2016, showed the following: -All residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; -The facility must thoroughly investigate the alleged violation, prevent further abuse while the investigation is in progress, and take appropriate corrective action; -Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability; -Sexual abuse is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident property when one staff member (Business Office Manager (BOM) A) took money from four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) without their permission and not for resident use. The facility census was 49.Review of the facility's Guidelines for Maintaining the Resident Trust Fund Account, revised 08/04/22, showed the facility will establish and maintain a system that assures full, complete, and separate accountings of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf. 1. Review of the probable cause statement from the [NAME] County Sherriff's Office, dated 03/17/26, showed the following:-The officer had probable cause to believe that BOM A committed one or more criminal offenses including theft of $750.00 or more;-On 03/12/26, at approximately 10:32 A.M., the deputy was dispatched to the facility for a report of theft. Dispatch advised the deputy the Administrator needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to complete and document a full investigation of all allegations of abuse with steps taken to protect residents during the investigation documented when staff failed to fully investigate one allegation of abuse made by one resident (Resident #1) alleging abuse by one staff member (Restorative Nurse Aide (RNA)) E. The facility census was 48.Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, showed the following:-Each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse;-All employees who have been alleged to commit abuse will be suspended immediately, pending investigation;-Facility will complete an investigation. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission data) showed the following:-admission date of 06/26/25;-Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy-acute (brain suddenly isn't working right because of a chemical imbalance or problem with the body's metabolism), restlessness and agitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to Administrator and within two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) to management and DHSS in a timely fashion. The facility census was 48.Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, showed the following:-Each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse;-All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources, and misappropriation of resident property by facility employees, contract employees, or volunteers will be reported immediately, but no later than the following timeframes. If abuse is alleged or the allegation results in serious bodily injury, the allegation must be reported within two hours after the allegation was made;-All employees of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner, when one staff member (Social Services Director (SSD)) would not allow one resident (Resident #1) to smoke after the resident displayed behaviors. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights, undated, showed the following: -The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; -The resident has the right to exercise his/her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States; -The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination and reprisal form the facility in exercising his/her rights, and be supported by the facility in the exercise of his/her rights. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (admission data) showed the following: -admission date of 01/21/25; -Diagnoses included transient cerebral ischemic attack (disruption of blood flow to the brain), dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the state licensing agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when staff failed to report two allegations of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) to management and DHSS in a timely fashion. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised 11/28/16, showed the following: -Educate all staff to report to the Administrator and/or designees any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property; -The Administrator or designee must report to the State Survey agency no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event involved abuse or resulted in injury. -All residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; -Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to complete and document a full investigation of all allegations of abuse with steps taken to protect residents during the investigation documented when staff failed to fully investigate two allegations of abuse made by one resident (Resident) alleging abuse by staff. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised 11/28/16, showed the following: -Educate all staff to report to the Administrator and/or designees any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property; -All residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; -Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability; -Physical abuse is defined as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, biting, etc. It also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report all allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services- DHSS) within the required two hours when staff did not report multiple allegations of sexual abuse by one resident (Resident #1) towards other residents to DHSS. The facility census was 49. Review of the facility policy, titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised 11/28/16, showed the following: -Educate all staff to report to the Administrator and/or designees any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property; -The Administrator or designee must report to the State Survey agency no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event involved abuse or resulted in injury. -All residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; -Verbal abuse is defined as the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews of every certified nurse aide (CNA) at least once every 12 months when staff failed to document competency evaluation and performance review for two staff (CNA N and CNA M). The facility census was 39. Review showed the facility did not provide a written policy pertaining to nurse aide competency reviews. 1. Review of personnel records showed the following CNAs had been employed for more than one year: -CNA N - Hire date of 12/20/22; Re-hire date of 04/26/23; -CNA M - Hire date of 01/27/23; Re-hire date of 06/28/23; -Staff did not have documentation of a yearly performance review for CNA N and CNA M. During an interview on 09/11/24, at 9:08 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did scheduled monthly in-services for all staff, with some specific to nursing and the CNAs. They did not have documentation on annual performance reviews. During an interview on 09/12/24, at 3:30 P.M., the corporate Quality Assurance Registered Nurse (QARN) said the corporation did not have a specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities based on residents' interests and abilities when the staff failed to provide a complete activity schedule with a variety of daily activities, failed to complete activities as scheduled, and failed to document steps taken to provide meaningful activities for nine residents (Resident #13, #17, #14, #39, #9, #16, #7,#40, and #16) out of a sample of 20 residents. The facility had a census of 39. Review of the facility policy titled, Activity/Recreational Therapy Manual last reviewed on 03/2012, showed the following: -The purpose was for the facility to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident; -To enhance the quality of the residents daily life; -Upon admittance, annually, and upon significant change, an initial assessment was to be completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a sanitary and comfortable fashion when staff failed to keep the outside of the ice machine clean and failed to keep all light fixtures, vents, and ceiling areas clean. The facility census was 39. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Ice Maker, dated May 2015, showed staff would clean the outside of the machine week. Staff would wash the outside of the ice machine monthly with a soft brush or cloth and dry. Review of the facility's Ice Machine Cleaning Schedule showed the machine was to be cleaned monthly. Staff last documented cleaning the ice machine on 08/31/24. Observations on 09/09/24, beginning at 9:13 A.M., of the ice machine in the kitchen showed the following: -The outside had white and brown buildup along the crevasses of the machine at the top; -The right side of the machine had three long streaks of white; -The left side of the machine had much of it covered with white streaks and a crusty white substance; -Above the door opening there was a dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 15 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of need for one resident (Resident # 39) when staff did not place the resident's call light where it could be accessed by the resident. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility policy titled, Use of Call Light, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Answer all call lights in a prompt, calm, courteous manner; -When providing care to the residents, be sure to position the call light conveniently for the resident's use; -Tell the resident where the call light is and show him/her how to use the light; -Be sure all call lights are placed on the bed at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. 1. Review of Resident #39's face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 06/04/24; -Diagnoses included stroke. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 06/04/24, showed the following: -Resident had a diagnosis of flaccid hemiplegia (a condition that occurs after a stroke and is characterized by a complete lack of voluntary movement in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the required Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a two level tool used to screen each resident in a nursing facility for mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission) prior to or upon admission to the facility for one resident (Resident #42). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's admission Packet showed a checklist showing Obtain DA 124C (preadmission screening related to psychological diagnoses). Review showed the facility did not provide a written policy pertaining to PASARRs. 1. Review of Resident #42's face sheet (gives brief profile information) showed the following: -admission date of 05/10/24; -Diagnoses included personal history of suicidal behavior with attempted self-injury, burn of unspecified degree of head, face, and neck, anxiety disorder, paranoid schizophrenia with acute exacerbation (mental disorder with symptoms of distrust, suspicion, and fear of others without reason,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's written care plan was accurate and up-to-date, when staff failed to care plan hospice services for two residents (Resident #39 and Resident #2). The facility census was 39. 1. Review of Resident #39's face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 06/04/24; -Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - refers to chronic bronchitis and emphysema, a pair of two commonly co-existing diseases of the lungs in which the airways become narrowed. This leads to a limitation of the flow of air to and from the lungs causing shortness of breath), stroke, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event); -Resident on hospice services. Review of the resident's current Physician Order Sheet (POS) showed an order, dated 06/04/24, for hospice evaluation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assist all dependent residents with activities of daily living to maintain good grooming when the facility staff failed to perform peri-care for one resident (Resident #41) following an episode of incontinence and toileting. The facility census was 39. 1. Review of Resident #42's face sheet (gives basic profile information about the resident) showed the following: -admission date of 05/14/24; -Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction that occurs due to a chemical imbalance in the blood) and congestive heart failure (CHF - irregular heart function). Review of the resident's care plan, last updated 08/15/24, showed the following: -Staff to assist with toileting; -Staff to provide changing and peri-care with each incontinent episode to keep skin clean and free from odor and breakdown; -Staff to apply barrier creams with each incontinent episode to maintain good skin integrity. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed acceptable standards of care when staff did not change gloves or sanitize their hands during care for the indwelling suprapubic catheter (tubing inserted directly into the bladder through the abdomen to drain to an exterior collection bag) of one resident (Resident #20). The facility census was 39. 1. Review of Resident #20's face sheet (gives basic profile information) showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included bipolar disease (mental disorder causing alternating depressive and manic episodes), generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, muscle weakness, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; enlarged prostate gland) with lower urinary tract symptoms, testicular hypofunction, indwelling urethral catheter, impaired cognitive function and awareness, and schizophrenia (mental disorder including hallucinations and delusions). Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to address one resident's (Resident #39) complaints of pain in a timely manner. The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's policy Pain Management Guidelines, dated January 2017, showed the following: -The goal of pain management will be to control pain so it will not interfere with the ability to have restful sleep patterns, perform activities of daily living (ADL's- dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting), participate in usual activities, or cause problems with mood or behaviors; -A licensed nurse or certified nurse aide (CNA) may assess and communicate degrees of pain to the person administering the pain medications to the residents; -Hospice residents will be provided pain medications according to the hospice program and physician orders; -The resident's description of his/her pain will be documented in the nurses progress notes/aide charting and/or on the MAR of the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #39's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all residents who were trauma survivors received care per standards of practice when staff did not address the the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event) in the medication record or in the care plan, to include triggers and interventions, and failed to ensure care staff were aware of the PTSD history, to include triggers and interventions, for one resident (Resident #41). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility assessment, updated 10/25/23, showed the following information: -The facility may accept residents with, or who may develop, common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, or combinations of conditions that require complex medical care and management including PTSD; -The facility will manage the medical conditions causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when staff failed to complete appropriate hand hygiene and use PPE appropriately while providing wound care for one resident (Resident #32). Facility staff also failed to complete appropriate hand hygiene while providing indwelling suprapubic catheter (tubing inserted directly into the bladder through the abdomen to drain to an exterior collection bag) care for one resident (Resident #20). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility policy, titled Handwashing, dated 03/2015, showed the following information: -Purpose to reduce transmission of organisms from resident-to-resident, staff-to-resident, and resident-to-staff; -Wash hands with soap and water. Review of the facility policy, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to Infection Control Guidance, updated 03/2024, showed the following information: -Policy purpose was to prevent broader transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility staff failed ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported timely when staff did not report an allegation of employee to resident abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) immediately to administration and within two hours of staff becoming aware of the allegation to the state survey agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS). The facility census was 32. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised 11/28/16, showed the following: -Educate all staff to report to the Administrator and/or designees any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property; -The Administrator or designee must report to the State Survey Agency no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event involved abuse or resulted in injury. Review of the facility policy titled Reporting, revised 11/2017, showed the following: -All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of possible abuse was immediately investigated with immediate steps taken to protect all residents during the investigation when staff failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1) and a staff member. The facility census was 32. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, revised 11/28/16, showed the following: -Educate all staff to report to the Administrator and/or designees any alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property. Review of the facility policy titled Reporting, revised 11/2017, showed the following: -All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property will be reported immediately; -All employees who have been alleged to commit abuse will be suspended immediately pending investigation. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal vaccines (vaccines used to prevent some cases of pneumonia, meningitis (swelling of brain and spinal cord membranes, typically caused by an infection), and sepsis (potentially life-threatening complication of an infection) to four residents (Resident #6, #10, #14, and #38) following the residents' admission to the facility, and staff failed to obtain a consent prior to administering an influenza vaccine for two residents (Resident #5 and #39) The facility census was 42. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, dated 11/30/15, showed the following: -Two pneumococcal vaccines are recommended for adults; -CDC recommends vaccinations with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13 or Prevnar 13) for all adults 65 years or older and people 19 through 64 years with certain medical conditions, including chronic (ongoing) conditions; -CDC recommends vaccination with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two (Residents #9 and #23) of three sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 42. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC-form CMS-10123) is issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons; -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to consistently document a resident's code status and failed to include the resident's code status in his/her care plan for one resident (Resident #9) in a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility census was 42. Record review of the facility policy titled, DNR Guidelines dated 9/2010, included the following information: -When a resident or legal representative decides to change the code status of the resident, the Social Services Designee will make the changes as soon as the OHDNR (out of the hospital do not resuscitate) form has been signed by the physician. -The Social Services Designee will complete the following: a green paper with Full Code (a person wanted all interventions needed to get his/her heart started. This may include chest compressions and defibrillation to shock the heart out of a life-threatening heart rhythm (cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR))) or a red paper with DNR (do not resuscitate) will be placed in the very…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility staff failed to obtain a physician order and provide proper cleaning and maintenance for a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP - a machine used to help a person breathe) for one resident (Resident #37) out of a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility census was 42. Record review of the facility's BIPAP Administration policy, from the Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, included the following: -Purpose to administer positive airway pressure to maintain open airway to the resident with obstructive apnea or respiratory problems breathing, primarily during sleep. -Care and use of BiPAP machine with cleaning mask, head gear, tubing and humidifier same as the CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) guidelines. Record review of the facility's CPAP Administration policy, from the Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, included the following information: -Contact QA (quality assurance) nurse prior to placement for clarification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for side rail usage and failed to complete timely side rail assessments to include bed rail safety checks, and regular inspections/measurements on the potential entrapment zones of the mattress to bed frame for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #241) in a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility census was 42. Record review of facility records showed the facility did not provide a policy regarding side rail assessment and assessments (measurements) of potential entrapment zones. 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet (general resident information form) showed the following information: -admission date of 4/4/16 with readmission date of 4/4/19; -Diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs, and truck of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), muscle weakness, epilepsy (seizures), and head injury. Record review of the resident's side rail assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 04/01/2009
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 04/01/2009
EVANS, DENISE LYNNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2014
LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2009

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-50.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$723K
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 1%Other / private 14%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $723K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,132per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$178per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265494. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next