No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lewis & Clark Gardens

1221 Boones Lick Road, Saint Charles, MO 63301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 142 certified beds · (636) 946-6140 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$139,916 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $139,916 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-23)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
711 Veterans Memorial Parkway · (636) 669-2211 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
711 Veterans Memorial Parkway, Suite 102 · (636) 669-2223 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.3 mi
1335 Bass Pro Dr · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1000 Rose Brae Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1040 Fairgrounds Rd · (636) 947-4263

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.2%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.8%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.8%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.4%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.0%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine8.3%63.5%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
53.4%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.475 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-08)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) out of a sample of eight residents, received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The facility failed to respond to a door alarm timely after the resident, who was assessed by the facility to be at risk for elopement, exited the facility through an alarmed exit door without staff knowledge. The door alarm volume was not loud enough for staff to hear until they were halfway down the resident's hall. The facility also failed to complete 15 minute checks for the resident who required 15 minute checks for aggressive behavior. The resident fell after he/she left the facility, sustaining multiple facial fractures and a subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain that can put pressure on the brain, leading to a variety of symptoms and potentially life-threatening complications if not treated promptly). The facility census was 76. On 4/24/25 the administrator was notified of the Past Non-Compliance Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse between two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), who engaged in sexual intercourse and whose capacity to consent to sexual activity had not been determined, in a review of 13 sampled residents. Resident #1 was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and had diagnoses including Alzheimers Disease, dementia, herpes viral infection, and human immunodeficiency virus disease. Resident #2 had diagnoses including vascular dementia and depression. When Resident #2 talked to his/her responsible party after the incident, he/she told the responsible party he/she did not want the sexual activity to occur, he/she was scared, and did not want to be around Resident #1. The facility census was 85. The administrator was notified on 5/10/24 at 4:13 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 5/2/24. The IJ was removed on 5/11/24 as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility's abuse prohibition protocol manual, undated, showed the following: -Establish a safe environment that supports,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to honor an advance directive for one resident (Resident #174) of 13 residents reviewed for code status. Resident #174 had a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) advance directive indicating the resident's wish for do not resuscitate (DNR) if the resident was found unresponsive. On [DATE], the facility called 911 and initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), despite Resident #174's advance directive. Subsequently, Resident #174 received CPR for 17 minutes against the resident's wishes. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.10 (Resident Rights) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on [DATE] when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 failed to honor Resident #174's advance directive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of seven sampled residents, was free from abuse and neglect when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A while sweeping the resident's room, refused to assist the resident with his/her request to retrieve paper from the floor and grabbed the resident's left hand/arm pushing the resident back causing the resident to fall onto the foot board of the bed. The resident fell onto the bed then slid off the bed onto the floor. CNA A stood watching the resident with no attempt to prevent the fall or assist the resident. The resident then scooted on the floor towards the door of the room, while CNA A continued to sweep the floor telling the resident to stay in the room, with no attempt to call for assistance or a nurse to assess the resident. The resident had diagnosis of Huntington's Chorea (a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder that causes the progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain. It affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) worked in the facility completing the duties of the DON and did not work as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of over 60 residents. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's Director of Nursing Job Description, dated May 2006, showed the following:-The primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of our nursing service department in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern our facility, and as directed by the Administrator and facility policies to ensure that the highest degree of resident care is maintained al tall times;-The DON must be in the facility or involved in other work-related activities, a minimum of eight hours per day, Monday through Friday. 1. Review of the facility's daily census recapitulation, dated March 2026, showed the total daily census for the month of March 2026 was 83 to 91 residents. Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment free from the presence of persistent urine and fecal odors with the carpet maintained in good repair. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility policy, Housekeeping Department, Seven Steps of Cleaning a Resident Room, undated showed no dust, no spots, no smudges, no smells equaled clean. 1. Observations on 03/20/26 from 9:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. showed the following:-Upon entry to the facility, there was a very strong smell of air freshener throughout the lobby area;-C hallway carpeted with several areas of stained carpet and a strong smell of air freshener;-room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a strong urine smell;-room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a strong urine smell;-B hall way carpet with several areas of stained carpet and a faint smell of urine covered up by a strong smell of air freshener. Observations on 3/31/26 at 9:45 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. showed the following:-Upon entering the facility, a strong odor of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently complete an investigation following falls to identify the root cause for the falls and failed to consistently evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and identify/revise interventions to prevent falls for two residents (Resident #5 and #1), in a review of 10 sampled residents. Staff failed to immediately report Resident #1's fall to the nurse per facility policy prior to assisting the resident off the floor following a fall. The facility census was 86. Review of the undated facility policy, Event Investigation, showed the following:-Purpose: to investigate the cause of all marks, discolorations, skin breaks and injuries which have not been witnessed. To identify any injuries after a resident sustains an event;-Any staff member who discovers, witnesses or is involved in an event should immediately report the event to the nurse in charge. The charge nurse is responsible for completion of the Report of Event form and forwarding to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse immediately and no later than two hours to the state survey agency after an allegation was made of physical abuse towards one resident (Resident #1) in a review of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the undated facility policy for Abuse and Neglect showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion-All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property by facility employees, contract employees, volunteers, contract services, consultants, physician, visitors, family members or other individuals will be reported immediately but no later than the following timeframes. If abuse is alleged or the allegation results in serious bodily injury, the allegation must be reported within two hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse involving one resident (Resident #1), in a review of seven sampled residents. Resident #1 made an allegation of verbal and physical abuse on 1/9/26, involving a staff identified by the resident as Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A. The facility census was 85.Review of the undated facility policy for Abuse and Neglect showed the following:-It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion;-It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated;-The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately;-The investigation will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with a palatable meal served at appetizing temperatures and texture and that conserved nutritive value and flavor. The facility census was 89.Review of the facility policy, Food Temperatures, dated April 2015, showed the following:-The Dietary Manager or designee is responsible for seeing that all food is the proper cooking temperature(s) as indicated on the standardized recipe before meal service begins;-The temperature of hot foods and beverage should be maintained no less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) during the duration of the meal service;-Hot food and beverage should be at least 120 degrees F when served to the resident;-Temperature of potentially hazardous cold foods should be maintained at no more than 41 degrees F. Prepare cold items a day in advance when possible. Place in the freezer 45 minutes before serving and use ice baths when needed. Review of the undated facility policy, Menus, showed standardized recipes are available in the dietary department for all foods on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing for four residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4), who relied on staff to assist with their activities of daily living (ADLs), in a review of five sampled residents, during the time the residents were temporarily relocated to the COVID isolation unit. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility's ADL policy, dated March 2015, showed no documentation related to how often a resident should be offered and/or assisted with bathing. 1. Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet showed he/she received hospice services.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility, dated 07/10/25, showed the following:-His/Her cognition was intact;-He/She required substantial/maximum assistance with bathing. Review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed/revised on 07/17/25, showed the following:-He/She needed some assistance with activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean, sanitary and orderly environment for one resident, (Resident #1) out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 69. The facility did not provide a policy for housekeeping services or clean and comfortable homelike environment. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnosis of Huntington's disease (a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder that causes the progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain. It affects movement, cognition, and behavior, and there is currently no cure). Review of the resident's annual Minimum Date Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 5/28/25 showed the following: -Sometimes able to make self understood and sometimes able to understand; -Requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); -History of falls. Review of video footage from a camera…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse when one Resident (Resident #2) of seven sampled residents, reported to staff another staff had threatened to hit him/her with a closed fist and the resident was fearful of retaliation. The facility census was 66. Review of the undated facility policy for Abuse Prohibition showed: -All staff are to report to the Administrator and/or Designees any alleged (all allegations) violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property; -The Administrator or designee must report to the State Survey agency no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later that 24 hours if the event that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury; 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet showed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #1), of seven sampled residents, to address care of a resident with diagnosis of Huntington's disease (a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder that causes the progressive breakdown of nerve cells in the brain. It leads to a decline in cognitive function, mood disturbances, and uncontrolled movements). The facility census was 69. Review of the facility policy for Care Planning Guidelines dated 10/1/2015 showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, any published interim RA manual errata documents, and applicable federal guidelines as the authoritative guide for completion of MDS, Care Area Assessments (CAA) and resident care planning. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following: -admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), was free from verbal abuse when Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B yelled and cussed at the resident and told the resident to shut up and when the resident refused cares. Resident #1 said he/she was shocked CMT B treated him/her in that manner and was scared of CMT B. The facility census was 73. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 5/13/25, which occurred on 5/3/25. On 5/5/25 the administrator became aware of a staff to resident abuse allegation involving Resident #1. Upon discovery, the facility suspended the staff member, conducted an investigation, and notified appropriate parties and the police. Staff members were in-serviced on the facility abuse policy, including staff to resident abuse and reporting abuse, and all facility staff was educated on the facility abuse policy and expectations on monitoring and responding to residents. The deficiency was corrected on 5/6/25. Review of the facility's undated Abuse Policy showed the following: -It is the policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of sampled residents, remained free from misappropriation of property when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A took the resident's government issued debit card without the resident's knowledge and permission and used the card to withdraw cash from several ATM's totaling $864.00, used the card to pay Boost Mobile (a cell phone company) $65.00, Spectrum for $140.86, Ameren for $100.00, and for doordash food totaling $140.23. The facility census was 76 On 4/11/25 at 3:00 P.M., the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 4/3/25. On 4/3/25, the administrator became aware of the violation of misappropriation of the resident's government issued debit card and monies taken from the account by CNA A. Upon discovery, the facility suspended CNA A, conducted an investigation, and notified appropriate parties. Staff reviewed the facility misappropriation policy, and all facility staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to CDGZ12. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders for wound care for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #1), in a review of ten sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Physician Orders, showed the following: -Physician's orders must be signed by the physician and dated when such order was signed; -Physician orders must be reviewed and renewed; -The policy did not address following physicians orders. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Wound Care and Treatment, showed the following: -It is the purpose of the facility to prevent and treat all wounds; -There must be a specific order for the treatment. 1. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 08/26/24, showed the following: -Surgical wound; -Application of non-surgical dressing other than to feet; -Diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to CDGZ12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing activities program designed to meet individual interests for two residents (Resident #2 and #5), in a review of 10 sampled residents and four additional residents (Resident #15, #18, #19 and #20). The facility also failed to provide activities in the evenings and on the weekends. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Role of the Activity Director, dated March 2012, showed the following: -The Activity Director provides a key role in enhancing the quality of a resident's daily life; -The Activity Director plans and promotes meaningful activities based on the resident's interests and desires to provide a more homelike atmosphere in the facility. 1. Review of the facility's activity calendar, dated September 2024, showed the following: -No activities scheduled after 3:00 P.M.; -No activities scheduled on Saturdays and Sundays. 2. Review of the resident council minutes, dated 09/11/24, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and maintained in a manner to ensure the safe storage, preparation, and distribution of food. Staff failed to wash hands and utilize gloves appropriately during meal preparation and service, failed to properly wash dishes in the three-compartment sink and ensure sanitizer solution was available for use, failed to properly clean food preparation surfaces with sanitizing solution, and failed to ensure the temperature in one freezer was at least 0 degrees Fahrenheit or below. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the Registered Dietician's Kitchen Observation, dated 7/22/24, showed the following: -Open food items were not stored or properly sealed and labeled and dated; -Not all food was properly covered, labeled or dated; -The stove/oven was not clean. The front of the stove needs cleaned; -The microwave was not clean; -The cooler/freezer was not clean. Food debris was on the floor of the reach-in cooler/freezer; -The walls were not clean, without damage. The wall behind the dish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders for wound care for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #1), in a review of ten sampled residents. The facility census was 85. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Physician Orders, showed the following: -Physician's orders must be signed by the physician and dated when such order was signed; -Physician orders must be reviewed and renewed; -The policy did not address following physicians orders. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Wound Care and Treatment, showed the following: -It is the purpose of the facility to prevent and treat all wounds; -There must be a specific order for the treatment. 1. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 08/26/24, showed the following: -Surgical wound; -Application of non-surgical dressing other than to feet; -Diagnoses of anxiety disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing activities program designed to meet individual interests for two residents (Resident #2 and #5), in a review of 10 sampled residents and four additional residents (Resident #15, #18, #19 and #20). The facility also failed to provide activities in the evenings and on the weekends. The facility census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Role of the Activity Director, dated March 2012, showed the following: -The Activity Director provides a key role in enhancing the quality of a resident's daily life; -The Activity Director plans and promotes meaningful activities based on the resident's interests and desires to provide a more homelike atmosphere in the facility. 1. Review of the facility's activity calendar, dated September 2024, showed the following: -No activities scheduled after 3:00 P.M.; -No activities scheduled on Saturdays and Sundays. 2. Review of the resident council minutes, dated 09/11/24, showed the residents requested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hazardous materials were kept secured and inaccessible to residents. The facility capacity was 142 and the census was 82. Observation on 8/5/24 from 11:28 A.M. to 6:58 P.M., during the life safety code tour of the facility, showed the following: -Six containers of chafing fuel were in an unlocked cabinet in the 200 hall dining and activity room; -A bottle of nail polish remover was in an unlocked lower cabinet in the ice cream/popcorn area located near the resident sitting area. The nail polish remover bottle label read '100% pure acetone, Warning: Keep away from children, Danger! Extremely flammable!; -A bottle of commercial surface disinfectant was in a lower unlocked cabinet in the 100/200 wing dining room. The label on the bottle read 'Keep out of reach of children'; -An unlabeled spray bottle containing purple liquid was in an unlocked cabinet near the lobby restrooms and resident sitting area; -An unlabeled spray bottle containing yellow liquid and a bottle of liquid starch were in an unlocked cabinet below the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure six residents (Residents #135, #136, #3, #22, #3, #43, and #42), in a review of 18 sampled residents, received respiratory therapy/care consistent with professional standards of practice and the residents' plan of care. The facility failed to administer Resident #135's oxygen per physician's orders, failed to obtain orders for his/her CPAP machine upon the resident's admission to the facility, and failed to label oxygen tubing per the resident's physician's orders. The facility failed to apply Resident #136's BiPAP as ordered, failed to label Resident #3's oxygen tubing and humidification, and failed to properly store nebulizer masks when not in use for Residents #22, #43 and #42. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's undated policy, Oxygen Administration, showed the following: -Humidification bottles should be labeled with the date and time they were opened; -Place cannula tubing in plastic bag attached to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy, Food Temperatures, dated April 2011, showed the following: -Hot foods should be at least 120 degrees F when served to the resident; -Place cold menu items in the steam table over an ice bath with the well of the steam table turned off. 1. During an interview on 08/06/24 at 10:23 A.M., Resident #135 said the food did not taste good. During interview on 8/6/24 at 10:35 A.M., Resident #72 said the food was often bland. During interview on 8/5/24 at 2:50 P.M., Resident #67 said the food was cold and had no seasoning. 2. Review of the spreadsheet menu on 8/5/24 showed the dinner meal included barbeque pork and pasta salad. Review of the recipe for the pasta salad showed to hold the temperature at 41 degrees or lower for the meal service. Observation on 8/5/24 at 5:04 P.M. showed the Dietary Manager identified Dietary [NAME] W had not prepared the pasta salad from the dinner meal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff offered nourishing evening snacks for residents who wished to have a snack for seven residents (Resident #3, #46, #43, #47, #54, #135 and #72), in a review of 18 sampled residents, and for two additional residents (Residents #13 and #67). The facility also failed to ensure all residents were provided equal opportunity to have a snack. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's undated policy, Menus, showed a bedtime snack shall be offered to all residents per federal and state regulations. 1. Review of Resident #3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility, dated 10/9/23, showed the following: -Cognition was intact; -He/She considered it very important to have snacks between meals. Review of the resident's Physician's Orders, dated August 2024, showed an order for staff to offer/provide bedtime snacks to the resident daily. During an interview on 8/6/24 at 4:00 P.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff performed appropriate hand hygiene and changed gloves during the provision of care for two additional residents (Residents #32 and #2), and four residents (Residents #23, #22, #43, and #47), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one resident (Resident #19), and failed to complete Tuberculin Skin Testing to rule out Tuberculosis (TB) for three employees, in a review of 10 sampled employees. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy, Hand Hygiene and Gloves, dated August 2009, showed the following: -Wash hands with soap and water when hands are visibly dirty or soiled with blood or other body fluids, or after using the restroom; -Clean your hands by rubbing them with an alcohol based formulation if your hands are not visibly soiled; -Use hand hygiene before touching a resident, before clean/aseptic procedure, after body fluid exposure risk,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine that can protect against pneumococcal disease) as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for five residents (Residents #23, #78, #3, #19, and #45), in a review of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's undated policy, Immunization, showed the following: -The resident's physician will be consulted and determine the level of risk and need for the vaccinations; -A physician order is required to administer any vaccination; -The resident/or responsible party have been educated/given a copy of The Center for Disease Control Vaccine Information Sheet on pneumococcal vaccines and have had the immunization consent. or refusal form filled out and signed by resident/ or responsible party. Review of the CDC Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate, reviewed 9/22/23, showed the following: -Adults 65 years or older who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one resident (Resident #135), in a review of 18 sampled residents, when staff failed to recognize the resident's need for portable oxygen when out of in his/her room, failed to ensure the resident had means for locomotion after his/her requests for a wheelchair due to his/her shortness of breath, and failed to recognize the resident's use of a cardiac (heart) monitor for his/her pacemaker (surgically implanted device to control an irregular heart rhythm) and to contact the physician for orders to continue use of the monitoring device. The facility census was 82. During an interview on 08/08/24, the Director of Nursing said the facility did not have a policy for accommodation of needs. 1. Review of Resident #135's undated Continuity of Care Document (CCD) showed the following: -He/She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included shortness of breath and disease of the pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare pureed food items according to the recipe to ensure the puree was a smooth consistency. The facility identified one resident on a pureed diet. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy, Types of Diets, dated April 2011, showed for a pureed diet, foods should be blended to a mashed potato consistency or altered to meet the needs of the resident, using as little liquid as possible. Review of the Resident Orders, dated 8/6/24, showed one resident had a physician order to receive a pureed diet. 1. Observation on 8/5/24 at 12:04 P.M. showed the Dietary Manager prepared the pureed meal tray from the steam table. The pureed chicken was the consistency of ground chicken with visible chunks of chicken, and the pureed carrots contained visible chunks of carrots. 2. Review of the recipe for pureed barbeque pork showed to process until smooth. Observation on 8/5/24 at 5:13 P.M. showed the Dietary Manager prepared pureed barbeque pork in the food processor. Pieces of the pulled pork were visible in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Refer to NITN12. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided two residents (Resident #1 and #5), of nine sampled residents who were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADL), the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. Staff failed to assist and provide nail care and grooming to include shaving. The facility census was 82.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Refer to NITN12. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply hand splints (an external device that is used to support and protect injured bones, ligaments, tendons, and other tissues and to treat contractures (a shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) that can be caused by disease or trauma) for one resident (Resident #1) with hand contractures in a sample of nine residents. The facility also failed to apply palm protectors (used to prevent fingers from digging into the palm of your hand, to prevent skin damage and prevent further deformity) for Resident #1 as directed by Occupational Therapy. The facility census was 82.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided two residents (Resident #1 and #5), of nine sampled residents who were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADL), the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. Staff failed to assist and provide nail care and grooming to include shaving. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility policy Bath (partial), undated showed the following: -The purpose was to maintain skin integrity, comfort, and cleanliness; -Wash face and ears, wash neck arms chest and abdomen, give special care to the folds of skin, hands, and feet. Wash thighs, legs, and feet; -Care of fingernails and toenails was part of the bath. Be certain nails are clean. Review of the facility policy Bath (shower), undated showed the following: -The purpose was to maintain skin integrity, comfort, and cleanliness; -Wash face and shampoo hair, wash upper extremities and body, wash lower extremities and feet; -The policy did not direct staff to trim nails or to shave the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply hand splints (an external device that is used to support and protect injured bones, ligaments, tendons, and other tissues and to treat contractures (a shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) that can be caused by disease or trauma) for one resident (Resident #1) with hand contractures in a sample of nine residents. The facility also failed to apply palm protectors (used to prevent fingers from digging into the palm of your hand, to prevent skin damage and prevent further deformity) for Resident #1 as directed by Occupational Therapy. The facility census was 82. Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Manual, dated 6/28/23, showed the following: -It is the purpose of the facility to see that each resident receives, and the facility provides the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the Resident Council concerning issues of resident care and quality of life in the facility, and failed to provide the Resident Council with rationale, responses, and actions taken regarding their concerns. The facility census was 79. Review of the facility policy for Resident Council dated 3/2012 showed: -Monthly Meetings will be held with minutes of the meetings documented. Recommendations for changes by the council will be given to the Administrator who will evaluate the recommendations. The resident council serves as a liaison between the employees, residents and others who interface with the facility; -Monthly meetings are held to assist with activity planning for the following month; -The Activities Director will act as the facility liaison for resident council; -Minutes are recorded and retained by the Activity Director; -Concerns and needs are addressed as voiced by members of the council; -All department leaders are encouraged to attend the meeting for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep carpet in good repair and odor free and failed to ensure resident equipment was clean and in good repair for one resident (Resident #2) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 79. Review of the undated facility policy for Housekeeping showed resident rooms cleaning procedure should be used for all resident rooms to maintain cleanliness and to promote infection control. The facility did not have a policy to address carpet cleaning or removal of stains, urine, feces or odors from the carpet. 1. Observation of the facility on 12/27/23 at 9:45 A.M. showed the following: -Upon entry through the front door, the lobby, hallways and sitting area were carpeted. There was a strong odor of urine noted; -The 100 hall and resident rooms were carpeted; -A strong old urine odor noted upon entry to the 100 hall and coming from resident rooms. During an interview on 12/26/23 at 3:30 P.M. the Assistant Director of Nursing said there were odors on the 100 hall. Housekeeping had been doing deep cleaning, but there were several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to make a prompt effort to resolve resident grievances (cause for complaint) and provide written documentation of responses related to the grievances. The facility failed to develop a grievance policy and procedure that included all required components for three residents (Resident #2, #4 and #5) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 79. Review of the undated facility policy for Grievance Protocol showed: -The purpose of the Grievance/Complaint Report and Grievance Log is to provide a written record of each resident and family concern and to insure proper follow-up through the appropriate discipline; -The Social Service Director is responsible for the program, although the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the proper implementation of the program. The Social Service Director informs the Administrator of each incident; -Any member of the Social Service staff can complete the Grievance Complaint Report. The appropriate situation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives for two residents (Residents #4 and #5), in a review of five sampled residents, when staff failed to ensure residents' preferences for bathing were honored. The census was 79. The facility did not provide a policy for resident preferences for bathing. 1. Review of Resident #4's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 9/27/23 showed: -Able to understand others and able to make self understood; -Alert and oriented and able to make appropriate decisions; -Ability to make decisions about daily activities and choices very important -Dependent upon two staff members for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); -Diagnoses of spinal cord injury with quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso). During an interview on 12/26/23 at 11:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for two residents (Resident #2 and #3), of five sampled residents when failed to obtain and administer medications and supplements for weight loss as ordered by the physician. Review of the undated facility policy for admission Nurse's Note showed the following: -Ensure information is documented for the resident upon admission; -Upon admission of a resident the nurse will document the time the physician was notified of admission and verification of admission orders, and the time medication was ordered from the pharmacy. Review of the facility policy for Medication Orders, Standing Orders dated 7/2021 showed: -Policy: Certain, common, self-limited conditions are often amenable to treatment with nonprescription medications, using good nursing judgement. To facilitate prompt treatment of such conditions, and to avoid unnecessary telephone calls to those prescribers who approve, standing orders are used. Standing orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview,, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to provide oral hygiene, access to fluids and assistance with dining for one resident (Resident #2) in a review of five residents who was unable to carry out his/her own activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 79. Review of the undated facility policy for Oral Hygiene showed the following: -The purpose is to clean he mouth, teeth and dentures; -Offer oral hygiene before breakfast, after each meal and at bedtime; -Equipment included toothbrush, toothpaste, water, emesis basin, towel, tissue and denture cup if necessary. Review of the undated facility policy for Hydration showed the following: -Each resident is supplied with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration; -Fresh water is distributed each shift, pitchers and glasses are within reach of the resident and residents who are unable to pour and drink independently will be given assistance by staff. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for pressure ulcer prevention or care plan interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, when staff failed to document skin assessments and wound assessments for one resident (Resident #2), developed a Stage II pressure ulcer, of five sampled residents. The facility census was 79. Review of the undated facility policy for Wound Care and Treatment showed: -Purpose: It is the purpose of this facility to prevent and treat all wounds; -There must be a specific order for the treatment; -The care plan should reflect the current status of the wound and appropriate goals and approaches -Prevention Strategies included on-going skin assessment with weekly documentation of status. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff dated 11/22/23 showed the following: -The resident can sometimes make self understood and usually understands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide notification that a resident no longer qualified for Medicare Part A skilled benefits for one resident (Resident #244) of 3 residents reviewed who should have received notification. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) or a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for Resident #244 when the resident was discharged from therapy services. Findings included: On 11/30/2022 a copy of the NOMNC and SNF ABN notifications were requested for three residents who received Medicare Part A skilled benefits and were required to have notifications. Resident #244 was one of the three residents and no NOMNC or SNF ABN notification was provided for Resident #244. A review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form completed by the Social Services Director (SSD ) on 11/30/2022 indicated Resident #224's last covered day of Medicare Part A was 06/21/2022. The SSD wrote on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, dated 11/28/2016, revealed the intent was the facility must take the following actions in response to alleged violation of abuse, neglect exploitation or mistreatment: Thoroughly investigate the alleged violation. Further review of the policy revealed under the Suggested Checklist: Comprehensive Abuse Prevention Management and Reporting Program and Policy and Procedure section, that The facility must have evidence (documentation forms) of a thorough investigation including resident statements, witness statements, staff statements, environmental review, resident physical assessment, etc.[et cetera], including a timeline of events. A review of Resident #8's Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for one resident (Resident #47) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: An interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 12/02/2022 at 1:30 PM revealed the facility did not have a policy related to PASARR guidance and provided a PowerPoint presentation that included the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance on PASARR. A review of the Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #47 on 12/01/2021 and readmitted the resident on 09/15/2022 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. A review of Resident #47's medical record revealed there was no PASARR Level 1 completed. An interview on 12/02/2022 at 1:17 PM with the Social Services Director (SSD) revealed that after a referral had been approved for a new resident's admission, it was his/her responsibility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing for one resident (Resident #19) of 3 residents reviewed for bathing. Findings included: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Bath (Shower), revealed the purpose was to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness. There was nothing in the policy addressing timeframes of bathing. A review of Resident #19's Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses including myoneural disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. A review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing. A review of Resident #19's care plan, dated 05/29/2020, revealed the resident was limited in their ability to bathe themselves and needed assistance from staff. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-06-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served the correct portion sizes and prepared food items according to the dietary spreadsheet menu for residents on physician-ordered regular, mechanical soft, and pureed diets. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility's Order Report by Category, dated 6/12/19, showed 76 residents on a regular diet, 13 residents on a mechanical soft diet, and six residents on a pureed diet. 2. Review of the diet spreadsheet for lunch on 6/12/19 (Spring/Summer 2019, Week 2, Day 11) showed residents on a regular diet were to receive 6-ounces (2/3 cup) of ham and beans and 4-ounces (1/2 cup) of seasoned cabbage. Observation on 6/12/19 at 10:49 A.M. showed Dietary Staff W placed all pans of food on the steam table for the lunch service. The following serving utensils were visible in the pans of food on the steam table: -Ham and beans, 4-ounce (1/2 cup); -Seasoned cabbage, 3-ounce (3/8 cup). Observation on 6/12/19 between 11:10 A.M. and 12:05 P.M. showed Dietary Staff W served all residents on a regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands and changed soiled gloves when indicated by professional practices during personal care for five Residents (Resident #154, #7, #96, #76 and #15) of 21 sampled residents and for two additional residents (Resident #46 and #87). Staff failed to properly handle dirty linen and trash when staff allowed collection bags to remain on the floor throughout their shift, failed to properly store the cap of a feeding tube in a way that prevented the risk of contamination, failed to administer medications with appropriate infection control technique and failed to complete and document TB (serious infection, usually of the lungs caused by bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis) testing in the required time after admission. Further review showed the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-18 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for two residents (Resident #7 and #96) of 21 sampled residents and one additional resident (Residents #46) when staff left them exposed for an extended amount of time during personal cares. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the booklet, Resident Rights For Long-Term Care in Missouri provided to residents and families by the facility upon admission, showed residents should be treated with consideration and respect and with full recognition of dignity and individuality. 2. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long-Term Care Facility Student Reference, under Resident Rights (State of Missouri) revised 2001, showed the following: Right to be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and care of his/her personal needs. Respect resident's privacy, close doors, pull curtains, cover the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-18 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had reasonable access to their personal funds on an ongoing basis. The facility managed funds for 55 residents. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the Facility/Business Office Manager Resident Trust Workflow and Facility Policy showed no documentation of times for facility banking hours. 2. Record review of the facility undated admission agreement, section titled Protection of Resident Funds, showed the following: -The facility would maintain resident personal funds that do not exceed $50.00 in a non-interest bearing account or petty cash fund; -These funds were kept in the facility; -Residents could withdraw or deposit these funds by contacting the office manager during normal business hours. 3. Observation from 06/11/19 through 06/14/19, showed no posting of banking hours throughout the facility. 4. During the resident group interview on 06/12/19 at 10:30 A.M., three of the five residents present said the following: -They were unable to get cash on the weekends; -If they wanted cash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odors for four residents (Resident #7, #15, #16, and #96), in a review of 21 sampled residents. Staff failed to provide complete incontinence care, oral care and grooming to include shaving. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility policy, Oral Hygiene, dated March 2015, showed the following guideline in part: -Purpose was to cleanse the mouth, teeth and denture; -Offer oral hygiene before breakfast, after each meal and at bedtime. 2. Review of the facility policy, Enteral Nutritional Therapy, dated March 2015, showed during cares, staff was to check the resident's mouth and give oral hygiene if necessary. 3. Review of the facility policy, Care of Nails, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Purpose was to provide cleanliness, comfort and prevent spread of infection; -Soak hands in basin of warm water, scrub nails gently and dry. 4. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care, treatment and services consistent with acceptable standards of practice to prevent and treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) for three residents (Resident #93, #15 and #76 ) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) of 21 sampled residents The facility identified seven residents with indwelling catheters. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy from the Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, showed the following: -The purpose is to prevent infection and reduce irritation; -For the female, use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse the labia; -Use one area of the wash cloth for each downward, cleansing stroke;; -Change the position of the wash cloth with each downward stroke; -Next, change the position of the cloth and cleanse around the urethral meatus; -With a clean washcloth, rinse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs in locked compartments when staff left the medication carts unlocked, failed to consistently reconcile controlled drugs listed as Schedule II (high potential for abuse potential), narcotics, failed to destroy expired narcotic medications, failed to ensure physician written prescriptions were obtained prior to removal of narcotic medications from the 300 Hall medication room narcotic cabinet, and failed to properly label narcotic medications removed (from the 300 Hall medication room narcotic cabinet) by one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and administered by another Certified Medication Technician (CMT). The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility policy Narcotic Count dated [DATE] showed the following: -The purpose was to complete a physical inventory of narcotics at each shift change to identify discrepancies; -The narcotics supply was to be kept under two locks at all times. The lock on the medication cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and provided food that is served at an appetizing temperature. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility policy, Food Temperatures, dated April 2011, showed the following: -Hot food should be at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) when served to the resident; -The Dietary Services Manager or designee is responsible for seeing that all food is the proper temperature before trays are assembled. 2. During interview on 6/11/19 at 3:24 P.M., Resident #63 said the following: -The facility meals were terrible; -The food temperatures were always cold, even on foods that were supposed to be hot. During group interview on 6/13/19 at 10:00 A.M., Residents #5, #12, #82, and #89 said the food was usually cold. During interview on 6/11/19 at 1:23 P.M., Resident #54 said the facility food was cold and did not have much taste. 3. Review of the facility diet spreadsheet for lunch on 6/12/19 (Spring/Summer 2019 Week 2, Day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and/or responsible parties when two residents (Residents #91 and #93), in a review of 21 sampled residents, had a change in their condition. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility's Condition Change Policy, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Purpose; To observe, record, and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented; -Guidelines: After all resident falls, injuries or change in physical or mental function; notify the resident's responsible party and notify the resident's physician of the change in condition, need for treatment orders and/or medication changes. 2. Review of Resident #93's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 5/8/19 showed the following: -The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's and dementia with behaviors; -The resident had severe cognitive impairment; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of staff to resident abuse for one resident (Resident #37) of 21 sampled residents, when the facility failed to follow their policy and interview other residents with similar care needs with specific questions related to the allegations and failed to interview staff, other than the staff involved with the allegation, who worked with the accused staff member. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the undated, facility Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual showed the following: -Facility investigative documentation would include: -Residents' statements; -Resident's roommate statements (if applicable); -Interviews obtained from three to four residents who received care from the alleged staff; -Interviews obtained from three to four different department staff, (if applicable); -Involved staff and witness statements of events; -A statement on a separate piece of paper completed by the alleged offender; -Everyone seeing or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff) for two residents (Residents #43 and #15) in a review of 21 sampled residents, within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 101. 1. During interview on 6/14/19 at 4:30 P.M. the MDS Coordinator said he/she followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 manual while completing residents' MDS. 2. Review of the Long Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, version 3.0 showed a significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status that: -Will not normally resolve itself without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and update a plan of care consistent with resident's specific conditions, needs, and risks for two residents (Residents #15 and #93), in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Users Manual, Version 3.0, Chapter 4, dated October 2011, showed the following: -The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident's unique characteristics, strengths, and needs; -A well-developed and executed assessment and care plan looks at each resident as a whole human being with unique characteristics and strengths; -The care plan should be revised on an ongoing basis to reflect changes in the resident and the care that the resident is receiving; -The effectiveness of the care plan must be evaluated from its initiation and modified as necessary; -Changes to the care plan should occur as needed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one sampled Resident (Resident #90) by failing to ensure the resident recieved ordered narcotic medications and that staff who prepared the medications administered the medications and one additonal resident (Resident #87), when staff failed to administer eye drop medication in the prescribed amount and with the proper technique. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility policy Installation of Eye Medication dated March 2015 showed the following: -The purpose was to introduce medication into the eye for treatment or for examination purposes; -Wipe away any secretions present; -Tilt resident's head backward, draw down lower lid. Have resident look up; -To prevent dropper tip from touching eye or lids, nurse should support hand on resident's forehead or bridge of nose. Introduce drop on center of everted lower lid; -Instruct resident to close eye. Gently press tissue against lacrimal duct (press the tear duct for one minute after eye drop administration or by gentle eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper technique during transfer for one resident (Resident #96) in a review of 21 sampled residents. During a transfer form the bed to wheelchair, staff lifted the resident under the arms and by pulling up on the back of the resident's pants and not with a mechanical lift as directed on the resident's care plan. The facility census was 101. 1. During interview on 6/25/19 at 4:00 P.M. the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy for transfers. 2. Review of the Nurse Assistant in Long Term Care Facility, student reference, 2001 revision, showed the following: -The nurse assistant should never transfer or ambulate residents by grasping their upper arms or under their arms; -Such a transfer could result in skin tears, damage to nerves and arteries, and possible dislocation of the shoulder. 3. Review of Resident #96's care plan dated 3/12/19 showed the following: -Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide ileostomy (surgical opening in the abdominal wall also called a stoma) care to prevent excoriation of the peri-stomal skin (skin surrounding the stoma) for one resident (Resident #96), who had a history of peri-stomal skin excoriation, of four residents with ostomies. Staff failed to change the resident's leaking ostomy appliance (wafer and attached drainage pouch system used to collect feces) and failed to keep the skin surrounding the stoma clean and dry. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility policy Colostomy and Ileostomy Care dated March 2015 showed the following partial guidelines: -Purpose was prevent infection, skin irritation and alleviate unpleasant odors and to obtain accurate bowel measurement output; -Be sure skin under bag was clean and dry. 2. Review of Resident #96's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed the following: -Required extensive assistance of two staff members with bed mobility; -Required extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were being fed by enteral (involving or passing through the intestine, either naturally via the mouth and esophagus, or through an artificial opening) means, received the appropriate treatment and services for the enteral feeding by failing to ensure the head of the bed was elevated during feeding and cares for one resident (Resident #7) in a sample of 21 residents. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Nutrition Therapy, dated March 2015, showed the resident should be placed in a Semi-Fowler's position (position where the back with the head and trunk are raised to between 15 to 45 degrees with 30 degrees being the most frequently used bed angle) unless contraindicated. 2. Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 01/29/19, showed the following: -Diagnoses included cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture), seizure disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to manage pain for one resident (Resident #90), in a review of 21 sampled residents, by not ensuring physician ordered medications were available and administered when scheduled. The facility census was 101. 1. During interview on [DATE] at 4:00 P.M., the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy for pain management. 2. Review of Resident #90's care plan, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident was at risk for pain. Needs pain management related to amputation of lower extremity; -Goal: The resident will maintain adequate level of comfort as evidenced by his/her ability to participate with activities of daily living (ADLs), and no verbal or non-verbal signs of distress; -Administer and monitor effectiveness. Assess and monitor the resident's pain as indicated using numeric scale or other evaluation tools as appropriate. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated [DATE], showed the following: -Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to monitor residents who used psychopharmacological medications to ensure attempts were made for gradual dose reductions (GDR) in an effort to reduce or discontinue these medications for two residents (Resident #15, and #37) in a review of 21 sampled residents. The facility failed to identify and treat one resident (Resident #37) who exhibited symptoms of potential side effects associated with the use of antipsychotic medications including tongue thrusts, lip smacking and rhythmic movements. The facility also failed to ensure one resident (Resident #15's), orders for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days as required except if an attending physician believed that it was appropriate the PRN order be extended beyond 14 days, then the physician should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the as needed order. The facility census was 101. 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment by failing to ensure the ceiling vents throughout the facility were cleaned and free of dust and debris. The facility census was 101. 1. Observation on 06/12/19 between 8:00 A.M. and 5:05 P.M. during the life safety code tour of the inside of the facility showed the following: -In the soiled utility room by room [ROOM NUMBER], the ceiling vent was covered with a thick layer of dust; -In the spa room across from room [ROOM NUMBER], a 6 inch by 6 inch vent and 4 inch by 4 inch vent were covered with a thick layer of dust; -In the bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and the beauty shop, a 4 inch by f4our inch ceiling vent was covered with a thick layer of dust; -In the beauty shop, a 4 inch by 4 inch ceiling vent was covered with a thick layer of dust; -In the rehabilitation bathroom, a round ceiling vent was covered with a thick layer of dust; - In the rehabilitation kitchen, a 6 inch by 8 inch ceiling vent was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$139,916 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $63,427 — penalty dated 2025-06-23
  • $17,300 — penalty dated 2025-04-24
  • $59,189 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-14 for 33 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Troy ManorTroy, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 11/14/2012
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2012
YATES, MELISSAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/06/2013
LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/06/2013

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-33.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 1%Other / private 14%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$262per resident / day
operating cost
$7,955per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$197per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265160. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next