Willard Care Center
400 West Walnut Lane, Willard, MO 65781 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (417) 742-3593 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.2% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.4% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 52.5% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.6% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.8% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.5% | 63.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 45.8% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.2% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was protected from possible contamination at all times when fans and vents were free of dirt and dust, when staff failed to discard a box of baking soda in the walk-in cooler with black substance on the container, when staff failed to air dry dishes before stacking, and when staff failed to ensure dishes were clean before stacking. The deficient practice had the potential to harm all residents. The facility census was 57.1. Review of the 2022 Missouri Food Code showed food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food in a clean, dry location and where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination.Review of the US Food and Drug Administration policy, under the section of Food Labeling and Handling, updated 03/04/23, showed the following:-Facility staff must ensure their proper storage, keeping track of when to discard perishable foods, and covering, labeling, and dating all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer as indicated;-Labeling, dating, and monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility nursing staff failed to provide appropriate neurological assessments (evaluation of the functioning of the nervous system, identifying any abnormalities or neurological deficits.) for three residents (Resident #5, Resident #15, and Resident #31) after each resident sustained a fall with potential for head injury. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Condition Change, Resident (Observing, Recording, and Reporting) (Includes Fall or Injury)), undated, showed the following: -Purpose: To observe, record, and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented; -Guidelines: After all resident falls, injuries, or changes in physical or mental function, monitor the following: -Observe for lacerations. If present, clean and apply dry, sterile dressing or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature when staff failed to hold four pureed meals at an appropriate temperatures prior to serve out. The facility census was 57. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Temperatures, dated May 2015, showed the following:-The Dietary Manager (DM) or designee is responsible for seeing that all food is the proper serving temperature(s) before trays are assembled;-Keep the temperature of hot foods no less than 140degrees Fahrenheit (F) during meal service;-Hot food should be at least 120 degrees F when served to the resident.Review of the facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Distribution, dated May 2015, showed the following:-Food is not placed in the steam table more than 30 minutes before meal service. Food is not held in warm ovens more than 30 minutes before meal service. Do not hold food on a steam table longer than two hours;-Do not hold potentially hazardous foods at room temperature during meal service;-Do not portion out food items such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to have processes in place to ensure all new staff were screened prior to employment for tuberculosis (TB - a serious illness that mainly affects the lungs and can be spread when a person with the illness coughs, sneezes or sings) when the facility failed to fully complete TB testing for five staff (Maintenance Director (MD), Medical Records (MR), Housekeeper (HK) C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A, and Registered Nurse (RN) B). The facility census was 57.Review of 19 CSR 20-20.100 Tuberculosis Testing for Residents and Workers in Long-Term Care Facilities showed the following:-Long-term care facilities shall screen their residents and staff for tuberculosis using the Mantoux method purified protein derivative (PPD) five tuberculin unit (5 TU) test;-Each facility shall be responsible for ensuring that all test results are completed, and that documentation is maintained for all residents, employees, and volunteers;-All new long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN - form CMS-10055) at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. The facility census was 57.Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C -09-20), dated 01/09/09, showed the following information:-The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC - form CMS-10123) issued when all covered Medicare services end for coverage reasons;-If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when staff failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #19) room was free of odors. The facility census was 57.1. Review of Resident #19's face sheet (brief resident profile) showed the following:-admission date of 03/20/26;-Diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (broken hip), vascular dementia (progressive decline in thinking, memory and behavior caused by impaired blood flow to the brain), heart disease, stroke, and obsessive compulsive disorder (chronic mental health condition characterized by uncontrollable recurring thoughts and repetitive behaviors).Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool completed by staff), dated 03/26/26, showed the following:-Cognitively intact;-Required substantial assistance from staff for toileting;-Frequently incontinent of bladder. Observation on 04/06/26, at 2:40 P.M., showed the resident lay in bed eating lunch. The area of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system in place that clearly and consistently represented each resident's choice of code status (whether or not the resident wished to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure used during cardiac or respiratory arrest)) when staff failed to ensure two residents' (Resident #1 and Resident #26) code status was consistent throughout the medical record. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directive, undated, showed the following:-admission of a resident to the facility, the social services designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate an advanced directive;-Upon admission of a resident, the social service designee will inquire of the resident, and/or his/her family members, about the existence of any written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident with pressure ulcers received care per standards of practice when staff failed to properly identify, adequately assess, and monitor the skin condition for one resident (Resident #2) with two pressure ulcers, one stage 3 (a full thickness skin loss injury, appearing as a deep crater extending through the dermis into subcutaneous fat), and one unstageable (a full thickness tissue loss where the actual depth is hidden below eschar (tan, brown, or black hardened tissue). The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Care and Prevention of Pressure Ulcer, undated, showed:-Treatment of pressure ulcers will vary depending on the orders of the attending physician;-The nurse is responsible for carrying out the treatment as ordered by the attending physician and for implementing measure to prevent pressure ulcers;-Observe skin, any persistent reddened area that remains after pressure is relieved is a high-risk area for a pressure ulcer to begin. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent possible urinary tract infections (UTIs) when staff allowed the resident's urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the body to drain urine) tubing to touch the floor, increasing the risk of infection for one resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 57. Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter, Emptying a Urinary Drainage Bag, undated, showed staff to keep the drainage bag and tubing off the floor, at all times, to prevent contamination and damage. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet showed:-admission date of 08/20/25;-Diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 03/07/26, showed the following:-Moderate cognitive impairment;-Dependent on staff for assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, taking shoes on and off, personal hygiene, transfers, and bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #6) had physician orders for the care of his/her colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening, called a stoma, in the abdominal wall) . The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Colostomy and Ileostomy (a surgical procedure where the end of the small intestine (the ileum) is redirected through a new opening in the abdominal wall, called a stoma) Care, undated, purpose to prevent infection, skin irritation, alleviate unpleasant odors, and to obtain accurate bowel measurement output.1. Review of Resident #6's face sheet showed:-admission date of 02/04/25;-Diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis of the lower half of the body), anxiety and depression. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 04/02/26, showed the following:-Resident cognitively intact;-Did not reject care;-Dependent on staff for assistance with toileting hygiene and lower body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents with mental health services as needed when staff failed to consistently notify the physician and failed to develop a care plan regarding statement regarding death made by one resident (Resident #7) that made suicidal comments. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Suicide Threats, undated, showed the following:-Resident suicide threats shall be taken seriously and addressed appropriately;-Staff shall report any resident threats of suicide immediately to the charge nurse;-The charge nurse shall immediately assess the situation and shall notify the Director of Nursing (DON) of such threats;-A staff member shall remain with the resident until the charge nurse arrives to evaluate the resident;-After assessing the resident in more detail, the charge nurse shall notify the resident's attending physician and responsible party, and shall seek further direction from the physician;-All nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered medication was available for resident use for one resident (Resident #6) when staff did not obtain and did not administer his/her ordered bladder spasm medication for approximately four weeks. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy titled, Medications, Errors and Drug Reactions, undated, showed, in part, the following:-Purpose to safeguard the resident and provide emergency care as necessary;-Report all medication errors immediately to the resident's physician, Director of Nursing (DON), and Administrator;-Document and follow the physician orders. 1. Review of Resident #6's face sheet showed:-admission date of 02/04/25;-Diagnoses included overactive bladder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anxiety and depression. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 04/02/26, showed the following:-Resident cognitively intact;-Dependent on staff for assistance with toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete regular inspections of the bed frame and side rails for risk of entrapment for one resident (Resident #51) whose side rails were loose. The facility census was 57.Review of the facility policy, titled Bed Rails, undated, showed the following:-Bed rails are constructed of metal or plastic, and are available in various sizes (full length, half, or quarter rails). Bed rails may be positioned in various locations on the bed: upper or lower, one or both sides;-When installing or maintaining bed rails, staff should follow manufacturer's recommendations and specifications for applicable bed rails, mattresses and bed frames;-Staff will conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails to identify areas of possible entrapment. When bed rails and mattresses are used in purchases separately from the bed frame, the facility will select equipment such as bed rails, mattresses, and bed frames that are compatible.1.Review of Resident #51's face sheet (brief resident profile) showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure notification to the resident's family/responsible party of changes of condition for all when residents when staff failed to document family/responsible party notification of four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) for resident change in health condition, resident falls, and/or new physician orders. The facility had a census of 58.Review of the facility provided Patient [NAME] of Rights as provided by the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (advocate for residents in nursing homes and assisted living facilities who helps protect their rights, health, and quality of life) Program, showed the resident had the right to:-Be fully informed of services available to you;-Participate in planning your care and being informed of all aspects of your care.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy provided related notifications of resident change in condition to responsible party or family members. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep all residents free from significant medication errors when staff administered one resident's (Resident #1) medication (ferrous sulfate - iron supplement) at the incorrect frequency for 82 days.A sample of four residents was reviewed for medication administration in a facility with a census of 56. Review of the facility policy entitled, Physician Orders, undated, showed medication orders should include type, route, dosage, frequency, and strength of the medication ordered. Review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Administration, revised 02/07/13, showed the following information:-Medications are given to benefit a resident's health as ordered by the physician;-Read the label three times before administering the medication. First when comparing the label with the medication sheet. Second when setting up the medication. Third when preparing to administer medication to the resident;-Administer medication and record the medication given on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure all residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status with the facility failed to follow-up and implement Registered Dietitian (RD) recommendations for two residents (Resident #1 and #4) with wounds and for three residents (Resident #2, #3, and #4) who were identified as under body weight. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's House Supplement Guidelines, dated May 2015, showed supplements are indicated when resident's intake at meals is not adequate to maintain weight, weight gain is needed, or weight loss is too rapid. Review of the facility's Supplement Guidelines, dated May 2015, showed the following: -Physician ordered supplements should be prepared and delivered by the dietary department; -Supplementation should be regular food and beverage items when possible before fortified liquid products are tried; -All individual supplements to be documented on the supplement list by the Dietary Manager (DM)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs, interests, and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for residents when the facility to provide meaningful activities for all residents, including two residents (Resident #1 and #2), and failed to care plan one resident's (Resident #2) specific activity interest. A sample of 8 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled Role of the Activity Director, dated 03/2012, showed the following: -The activity director provides a key role in enhancing the quality of a resident's daily life. The activity director plans and promotes meaningful activities based on the resident's interests and desires to provide a more homelike atmosphere in the facility; -Chart daily checklist of each resident's activities; post calendar of events where everyone can see it; secure entertainment well in advance and check with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible abuse were were reported to the state survey agency (Department of Health and Senior Services-DHSS) within the required time frame when staff did not report an allegations of possible abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility had a census of 39. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy titled, Reporting, undated, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility that each resident will be free from abuse: -Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion. The resident will also be free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Additionally, residents will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility. No abuse or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were fully and timely investigated when staff did not complete investigations of allegations of possible resident to resident abuse involving two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility abuse policy titled, Investigation, undated, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated; -The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately. A root cause investigation and analysis will be completed. The information gathered is given to administration. When an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the Administrator or Designee will investigate the incident with the assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care to all pressure ulcers per standards of practice when the facility failed to have a system in place to obtain wound care orders, ensure timely implementation of new wound care orders, to ensure timely physician notification of wounds, and to document and track wounds timely and completely for one resident (Resident #3) who admitted with stage 2 pressure ulcers (a partial thickness skin loss, appearing as a shallow open sore or a blister, where the top layer of skin (epidermis) and potentially the deeper layer (dermis) are damaged, resulting in a red or pink wound bed without exposed muscle or bone; it can also present as an intact or ruptured blister) on his/her buttocks. A sample of 8 residents was reviewed in the facility with a census of 31. Review of the facility's policy titled Wound Protocol, dated 2018, showed the following: -Chronic wounds should be dressed using a clean technique unless physician's orders state otherwise; -Wounds should be cleansed with a non-toxic agent; -Select a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of property when one resident's (Resident #1) laptop, that was listed on the resident's inventory of personal effects, could not be located. A sample of four residents was reviewed in the facility with a census of 28. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, undated, showed the following: -The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, including freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat-the-resident's-medical-symptoms; -Each resident has the right to be free from misappropriation of property and exploitation; -Misappropriation of resident property as defined at 483.5 means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent; -It is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of possible misappropriation to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required twenty-four hour timeframe after facility staff became aware of the allegation of misappropriation of property for one resident (Resident #1). The facility failed to notify local law enforcement of the allegation of misappropriation. A sample of four residents was reviewed in the facility with a census of 28. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual showed the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from misappropriation of property and exploitation; -It is the policy of the facility to encourage and support all residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers and resident representatives in reporting any suspected acts of abuse, neglect, exploitation, involuntary seclusion or misappropriation of resident property from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation; -An owner, licensee, administrator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a timely and thorough investigation of all allegations of misappropriation when staff failed begin an immediate investigation into one resident's (Resident #1) allegation of misappropriation and failed to document interviews with multiple staff and residents as part of the investigation. A sample of four residents was reviewed in the facility with a census of 28. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, undated, showed the following: -It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated; -The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately. A root cause investigation and analysis will be completed. The information gathered is given to administration; -Investigation regarding misappropriation: The facility staff will complete an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-03-10 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessments from the facility to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system within 14 days after completion for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #18) out of a sample of 17 residents selected for review. The facility had a census of 52 residents. The facility did not have a policy regarding transmitting MDS data. 1. Record review of Resident #'1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following information: -readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included Major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Record review of the resident's quarterly MDS assessment, due 1/18/20 and completed on 2/17/20, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to prevent infection or the possibility of infection when staff did not change his/her gloves and wash his/her hands between dirty and clean tasks. The facility had a census of 52 residents. Record review of the facility's infection control policy, titled Cleaning and disinfecting resident rooms, dated November 2008, showed the following information: -Housekeeping services (example, floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur, and when these surfaces are visibly soiled; -Use heavy-duty gloves and other personal protective equipment) for housekeeping tasks; -Heavy-duty gloves may be reused as long as the integrity of the gloves is intact and they are disinfected regularly; -Perform hand hygiene after removing gloves. Record review of the facility's Laundry policy, undated, showed the following information: -Contaminated laundry is bagged at the location where it is used and is not sorted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #31) had an appropriate wheelchair for safety and comfort out of a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility's census was 52. 1. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His/her diagnoses included pressure ulcer of his/her right buttock, dementia, post-polio syndrome (gradual new weakening in muscles that were previously affected by the polio infection), joint disorder and weakness. Record review of the resident admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/19, showed the following information: -Severe Cognitive impairment; -Dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, and for activities of daily living; -Impairment of range of motion of both lower extremities and of one upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #31), with limited range of motion, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a further decrease in range of motion in a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility's census was 52. 1. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed staff admitted the resident to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included pressure ulcer of the right buttock, dementia, anxiety, joint disorder and weakness. Record review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/19, showed the following information: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and bathing; -Resident had impaired functional ROM of both lower extremities and impaired functional ROM one upper extremity; -Used a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure proper cleaning and maintenance of a BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) (a non-invasive form of therapy for people suffering from sleep apnea (temporary cessation of breathing, especially during sleep)), failed to develop and implement interventions for use of a BiPAP and failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen for one resident (Resident #18) in a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility's census was 52. Record review of the facility's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Administration policy, dated March 2015, showed the following information: -Purpose: To administer positive airway pressure to maintain an open airway to the resident with obstructive apnea (repeated episodes of complete or partial obstructions of the upper airway during sleep, despite the effort to breathe, and is usually associated with a reduction in blood oxygen saturation) or respiratory problems, primarily during sleep; -Guidelines: Care and use of the BiPAP machine with cleaning mask, headgear, tubing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the psychosocial needs of one resident (Resident #27) who had a diagnosis of depression in a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility's census was 52. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet showed the resident originally admitted on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's current physician orders showed, in part, the following orders: -An order dated 9/17/19, for Duloxetine, 60 milligrams (mg), daily for major depressive disorder; -An order dated 9/17/19, for Trazodone, 50 mg, at bedtime for major depressive disorder. Record review of the resident's Social Services New admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool completed by facility staff) assessment note dated 9/23/19, at 1:28 P.M., showed the following: -The Resident and Social Services Director (SSD) completed the basic interview for mental status (BIMS) and mood interview; -The resident scored a 10/15 on the BIMS indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent when staff made two errors out of 34 opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 5.88 percent affecting two residents (Resident #26 and #38). The facility's census was 52. 1. Record review of Resident #26's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, persistent mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations or delusions, and symptoms of a mood disorder, such as mania and depression). Record review of the resident's medication administration record and physician order sheet for March 2019, showed: -An order, dated 12/14/19, for Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) enteric coated (EC) delayed release (DR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-03-10 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address one resident's (Resident #21) dental needs failed to document regarding dental pain, broken teeth, or other dental needs for the resident in a selected sample of 17 residents. The facility's census was 52. Record review of the facility's policy, dated March 2015, titled Oral Hygiene, showed the following information: -Offer oral hygiene before breakfast, after each meal and at bedtime. -Inspect mouth and gums for irritation or open areas. 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following information: -readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included stroke, heart failure, diabetes and dementia. Record review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) showed an order, dated 6/5/19, for a dental consult as needed. Record review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINCOLN, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 11/01/2013 |
| LINCOLN, JUDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 11/01/2013 |
| GROCE, JOSHUA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/16/2017 |
| LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2013 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265455. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.