No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Troy Manor

200 Thompson Drive, Troy, MO 63379 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (636) 528-8446 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0604) — most recent May 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations$104,685 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604) — most recent May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $104,685 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
890 E Cherry St · (636) 528-3330 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
103 N Lincoln Dr · (636) 528-8349 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.1%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.0%18.5%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.3%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.2%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.0%23.5%17.1%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
38.3%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.57 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.69 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-09)
27
at the previous standard inspection (2020-10-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques were followed for five residents (Resident #27, #29, #59, #501, #502 and #503) in a sample of 23 residents. The facility failed to follow infection control practices while performing blood glucose monitoring (a procedure where a drop of blood is obtained to test the amount of sugar in the blood) for Resident #27 and #29 when staff failed to appropriately sanitize the glucometer machine (machine that tests a drop of blood for the amount of sugar it contains) after use. Review showed Resident #29 had Hepatitis C (a virus that attacks the liver and leads to inflammation and is spread by contact with contaminated blood). Staff documented performing an accucheck on one resident, Resident #59, with the same glucometer that was not properly disinfected, after using it on Resident #29. The facility identified staff utilized this multi-resident use glucometer for five residents who resided on the 300 hall.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2020-10-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #51's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Cognitively intact; -Delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality); -Verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others two to four days out of seven; -Independent with mobility. Review of the resident's Physician Orders Sheet, dated 9/14/19, showed the physician prescribed Provera (a hormone used for sexual behaviors) 5 milligram (mg) three times a day for sexual dysfunction not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 9/27/19, showed the following: -Resident has impaired decision making and low cognitive score; -Goal: the resident will have positive experiences in daily routine without overly demanding tasks and without becoming overly stressed; -Calm the resident if signs of distress develop during the decision-making process (feeling overwhelmed, fatigue, agitation, restlessness, withdrawal); -Determine if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Residents #3, #5 and Resident #11), in a review of seven sampled residents, were free from abuse when Resident #1 caused physical harm to Resident #5 when he/she pulled him/her out of his/her wheelchair, resulting in a left shoulder fracture, and when he/she hit an additional resident, Resident #11, in the face and grabbed Resident #3's arm, causing the resident pain. The census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, dated 11/2016, showed the following: -The purpose of the facility policy is to prohibit mistreatment, neglect or abuse of any resident; -Abuse is the willful infliction of injury with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Review of the undated facility policy, Resident Rights, showed residents have the right to be free from abuse. 1. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services consistent with standards of practice to promote healing of existing pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and /or friction), when the facility failed to consistently and accurately assess and monitor pressure ulcers, provide routine dressing changes and prevent new ulcers from developing for two residents (Resident #5 and #7) in a review of nine sampled residents. Facility staff failed to implement and follow new orders for Resident #5 for seven days, causing the resident's wound to increase in size. Facility staff also failed to change a dressing for Resident #. The dressing was saturated with yellow to tan drainage. The facility census was 91. Review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) guidelines, dated September 2016, showed the following definitions: -Stage I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2020-10-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one additional resident (Resident #74) was free from physical restraints when staff held the resident's wrists with arms out stretched over the resident's head while staff provided personal cares. The resident reacted and resisted by yelling out at staff, moving his/her legs and attempted to move his/her arms that staff held down. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy Resident Rights undated showed the intent of the facility is to promote and ensure that highest standards of conduct and reliability by its employees and consultants to in turn produce environments in the facility that promote the highest standards of care and security for our residents and families we serve. Our residents will always be provided with the highest level of care and service, and if for any reason a resident, and or responsible party feel that such needs are not being met by their facility staff, they are entitled to a variety of avenues in which to resolve their concerns. Each resident shall be afforded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2020-10-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor a resident's weight, ensure interventions to address weight loss, including supplements and snacks, were consistently implemented, re-evaluate interventions for effectiveness, and ensure meals were set up for one resident (Resident #51), with a significant weight loss (18.9% loss), of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy for nutrition from Nursing Guidelines manual dated March, 2015 showed the following: -The facility would provide nutrition as determined by the physician and in cooperation with the dietician for all residents according to state and federal guidelines; -Residents would be provided meals three times a day at the facility's determined times; -Diet orders by the physician would be followed and if a resident did not like the meal offered, they would be given an alternative choice; -Staff would feed all residents who were unable to feed themselves; -Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), who resided on the dementia care unit, in a review of ten sampled residents, was free from verbal abuse when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A used derogatory language including cursing at the resident, while providing personal care and assisting the resident. This incident was witnessed by CNA B and CNA C. The facility census was 97. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 05/30/25, which occurred on 05/03/25. On 05/05/25, the administrator became aware of a staff to resident abuse allegation involving Resident #1. Upon discovery, the facility began an investigation and terminated the staff member. In-servicing of staff members had begun on the facility abuse policy, including the different forms of abuse, when to report abuse and who to report allegations of abuse to. This deficiency was corrected on 05/05/25. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse Prohibition, dated November 2016, showed the following: -It is the purpose of this facility to prohibit mistreatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a staff to resident allegation of verbal abuse to the State Agency per regulation and facility policy for one resident (Resident #1), who resided on the dementia care unit, in a review of ten sampled residents. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) B and CNA C witnessed CNA A yell and use demeaning and derogatory language, including cursing directed at the resident, while providing care. CNA B and CNA C left written statements under the administrator and Director of Nurses (DON) office door on 05/03/25, but did not report the abuse to the registered nurse (RN) D on duty. The administrator did not find the written statements until two days later, at which time it was reported to the State Agency, at least 40 hours following the occurrence of the alleged event. The facility census was 97. The administrator was notified of the past noncompliance on 05/30/25, which occurred on 05/03/25. On 05/05/25, the administrator became aware of a staff to resident abuse allegation involving Resident #1. Upon discovery, the facility began…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation of reported abuse for one resident (Resident #1), who resided on the dementia care unit, in a review of ten sampled residents, when certified nurse assistants (CNA) B and CNA C witnessed CNA A use demeaning and derogatory language including cursing directed at the resident while providing personal care. CNA B and CNA C left written statements under the administrator and Director of Nurses (DON's) door on 05/03/25. The administrator did not find the written statements until two days later. CNA A continued to work on the dementia unit with Resident #1 for the remainder of his/her shift on 05/03/25 and worked on 05/04/25 where CNA A had continued contact with Resident #1 and other residents on the dementia unit. The administrator did not conduct a thorough investigation, per facility policy, when he did not interview all involved staff, did not interview or obtain a statement from Resident #1, or interview three to four residents who received care from the alleged staff per facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Refer to QPGW12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food items at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 87.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on the 200 hall (Room #'s 211, 212 and 200) had access to hot water in their rooms, including two residents (Resident #9 and #13) in a review of seven sampled residents. The census was 85. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 12:55 P.M. the Administrator said she could not locate a policy on hot water temperatures but the temperature range should be between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. 1. Review of Resident #9's care plan, last revised 08/14/24, showed the following: -Incontinent of bladder and bowel; -Provide peri-care routinely and as needed. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility, dated 09/20/24, showed the following: -Partial to moderate assist with bed mobility; -Always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Observation on 10/03/24 at 8:38 A.M., showed the following: -Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) C entered the room and prepared to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food items at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility policy, Food Temperatures, dated April 2011, showed the following: -The Dietary Services Manager (DSM) or designee is responsible for seeing that all food is the proper temperature before trays are assembled; -Hot food should be at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) when served to the resident; -Hot/cold foods should not be placed together on the same plate. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 11:40 A.M., Resident #5 said he/she always eats in his/her room and the food was never hot. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 2:10 P.M., Resident #6 said he/she always eats in his/her room and the food was not always hot when it should be, he/she just figured it was cold because the facility had so many people to feed. During an interview on 11/19/24 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #8 said he/she always eats in his/her room and the food was always cold. Review of the Dietary Manager's, food temperatures-hall trays, showed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control procedures, including handwashing and gloving, while providing resident care for two additional residents (Residents #9 and #10). The census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Implementing the Body Substance Precautions, dated 06/2006, showed the following: -Handwashing remains the single most effective means of preventing disease transmission. Wash hands often and well, paying particular attention to around and under the fingernails and between fingers. Wash hands whenever they are soiled with body substances, after using the toilet, before performing invasive procedures and when each resident's care is completed; -Dirty gloves are worse than dirty hands because microorganisms adhere to the surface of a glove easier than to the skin on your hands. Handling medical equipment and devices with contaminated gloves is not acceptable; -Change gloves between contacts with different residents or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated one resident (Resident #4), in a review of seven sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #8) with dignity and respect. Without saying anything, staff pulled back the covers and yanked on Resident #4's arm and it hurt and scared him/her. Staff yelled Resident #8's name and spoke angrily toward the resident, frightening the resident. The census was 85. Review of Resident Rights, found in the employee handbook, last revised 10/01/17, showed treating residents with dignity and respect was not only the facility's policy, but also the law. Treat all residents with consideration, respect and dignity at all times. Your behavior must reflect your beliefs in this right in your daily interactions with the residents, families and visitors to our facility. Review of the undated facility policy, Resident Rights, showed the resident has a right to a dignified existence. The resident had the right to privacy and respect. 1. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a staff to resident allegation of abuse to the state agency for one resident (Resident #4), in a review of seven sampled residents. Resident #4 alleged, and Resident #12 witnessed and reported, an allegation of abuse by a staff member that occurred on 9/30/24 to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 9/30/24. Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B reported the allegation of abuse to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/30/24. Neither the ADON or the DON reported this allegation to the administrator or state agency per facility policy. The census was 85. Review of the undated facility policy, Abuse Reporting Guidelines, showed all alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident #4) in a review of seven sampled residents. The census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual, dated 03/2012 showed the following: Investigation Guidelines: -It is the purpose of this facility to investigate events that may indicate abuse; -All events listed under the Identification section of this manual will be initially investigated on the facility's incident report forms. This is done by the charge nurse, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator; -Review of an investigation form, that was to be completed with an investigation, showed it was to include: date and time of incident, person and title conducting the investigation, type of abuse, injury, medical attention, names of witnesses and alleged perpetrator, what happened, list of statements, resident physical condition report, review of physician order sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff repositioned one resident appropriately (Resident #9), in a review of seven sampled residents. The census was 85. Review of the facility policy, Positioning the Resident, dated 03/2015, showed the following: -To move the resident up in bed when a resident is helpless with two staff lifting: -A nurse stands on each side of the bed or both on the same side; - Flex the residents' knees; -One nurse supports the head, shoulders and back by placing one arm across the back to the opposite axilla (arm pit). With the nurse's free hand, he/she lifts and arranges the resident's head so that it rests comfortably on his/her arm. Nurse places his/her arm across the small of the resident's back; -The second nurse places one arm across the back, the other under the thighs. If nurses are on the opposite sides of the bed, head and shoulders may be supported with a pillow; -Both nurses lift the resident into position desired; -When using a pull sheet under the resident use two staff with one staff on each side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their life for four residents (Residents #6, #34, #58, and #70), in a review of 23 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Resident #89), who were cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living. Staff woke and dressed the residents early in the morning based on a get up list without consideration of the resident's preferences for waking and for staff convenience. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated Policy for Resident Rights showed the following: -It was the intent of the facility to promote and ensure that highest standards of conduct and reliability by it's employees and consultants to in turn produce environments in the facility that promoted the highest standards of care and security for the residents and the families of who they served; -Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents (Resident #1, #4, #34, #27 and #28) who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), in a review of 23 sampled residents, received the amount of assistance needed to complete ADL tasks. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility undated oral hygiene policy showed the following: -Purpose was to cleanse the mouth, teeth, and dentures; -Staff was expected to offer oral hygiene before breakfast, after each meal, and at bedtime. Review of the undated facility shower policy, showed the following: -Purpose was to maintain skin integrity, comfort and cleanliness; -Staff was expected to offer showers and encourage the resident to do as much of his/her own care as possible and supervise and assist as necessary. 1. Review of Resident #28's undated face sheet showed the resident's diagnoses included urinary tract infection, candidiasis (yeast infection), overactive bladder and panic disorder (anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities on a daily basis to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for three residents (Resident #4, #34, and #82) who resided in the facility's special care unit (SCU) and two residents who resided in the general population (Resident #1 and #58), of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility policy, Activity, Volunteer, and Recreational Services, dated March 2012, showed the following: -The activity director, assistants and volunteers of this facility, believe that everyone has the right to achieve the maximum of his or her potential; have opportunities for social involvement on an individual or group basis; and have outlets for creative abilities offering opportunities for self-development that would afford personal interest, enjoyment and satisfaction provided through an ongoing activity program; -The facility provides an ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of six residents (Resident #2, #4, #19, #34, #56, and #79), of 23 sampled residents. Staff failed to follow care plan interventions for fall prevention, including placement of proper footwear and fall mat use, and failed to ensure residents were transported safely in their wheelchairs when staff failed to place foot pedals on the wheelchair prior to transport. Staff also failed to prevent an elopement by not ensuring staff provided protective oversight for one resident (Resident #56), and failed to protect two residents (Residents #2 and #300) from Resident #79, who had a history of verbal and physical aggression toward other residents. The facility's census was 95. 1. Review of the facility Resident Elopement policy undated showed the facility provides 24 hour protective oversight and maintains the quality of life for each resident. Guidelines: 3. If a resident is admitted with no previous elopement potential, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess resident's need for bed rail use and and obtain informed consent with description of the risks of bed rail use prior to installing and using bed rails for three residents (Residents #25, #58, and #62), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated policy, Bed Rails, showed the following: -Once the bed rail observation is completed, the facility will print the observation and review associated risks and benefits with the resident and/or resident representative; -After the review is complete, the resident and/or resident representative will sign the consent line and the nurse will sign as well; (The policy did not address the frequency of bed rail assessments.) 1. Review of Resident #25's face sheet showed the following: -The resident had a responsible party; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior), falls, and weakness.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate amount of staff to provide care and protective oversight for residents on the special care unit (SCU). Residents on the unit had impaired cognition, were at risk for falls and behaviors including resident to resident altercations. The facility utilized nurse aides (NAs) on the unit with no certified nurse assistant (CNA) to work with the uncertified NA. The facility census was 95. Review of an electronic notification from the administrator on 3/26/24 at 7:22 A.M. showed she was unable to locate the facility's staffing policy. Observation of the SCU on 3/18/24 at 11:47 A.M. (day shift starts at 6:00 A.M.) showed the following: -The census of the SCU was 15; -Two NAs and one activity aide were present on the unit. The unit was staffed with two NAs (NA E and NA L) and one activity aide. Observation of the SCU on 3/19/24 from 7:00 A.M. until 3:00 P.M. showed the following: -Two NA's (NA E and NA K) worked the unit; -There was no activity aide on the unit. -Residents were left unattended in the TV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-09 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three nurse aides (NA) completed a certified nurse aide (CNA) training program within four months of their employment. The facility census was 95. Review of an electronic mail communication on 3/22/24 at 7:22 A.M., the Administrator said she could not locate a policy on Nursing Assistant and Certified Nursing Assistant training program. 1. Review of the facility provided list of employees hired since last annual survey showed NA E's date of hire was 7/5/21. Review of NA E's employee file showed no documentation he/she completed a CNA training program within four months of his/her hire date. Review of the staffing schedule dated March 2024 showed NA E was scheduled to work as an NA on 3/1/24, 3/2/24, 3/3, 3/4/24, 3/5/24, 3/6/24, 3/8/24, 3/11/24, 3/12/24, 3/13/24, 3/15/24, 3/16/24, 3/17/24, 3/17/24, and 3/19/24. During an interview on 3/18/24 at 11:47 A.M., NA E said she had been an NA since June of last year (2023) but had just finished classes. He/She was scheduled to take the knowledge portion of the certification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure scoops were not stored inside bulk containers with food items, failed to ensure food items were sealed when not in use, failed to maintain the exhaust vent over the dish machine to be free of a buildup of debris, failed to ensure two microwaves were easily cleanable and free of a buildup of debris, and failed to ensure the light bulb in the walk-in freezer was shielded. The facility census was 95. 1. Review of the facility policy, Receiving and Storage of Food, dated May 2015, showed the following: -The dining services manager is responsible for receiving and storing food and nonfood items; -Keep all foods in clean, undamaged wrappers or packages. Reseal open boxes effectively. Observation on 3/18/24 at 10:41 A.M. showed a large clear plastic storage tub with a green lid contained what appeared to be sugar (fine white crystals). The tub was not labeled. A blue measuring cup was stored inside the tub. Observation on 3/18/24 at 10:50 A.M. showed a metal scoop stored inside a bulk container of oats. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete inspections of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for three residents (Resident #25, #58, and #62), in a review of 23 sampled residents who used bed rails/assist bars. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated Bed Rails policy, showed the following: -Overview of FDA potential zones of entrapment with FDA dimension recommendations; 1. Zone 1: Within the rail; a. Any open space between the perimeters of the rail can present a risk of head entrapment; b. FDA recommended space: less than 4 ¾ inches; 2. Zone 2: Under the rail, between the rail supports or next to a single rail support a. The gap under the rail between the mattress, may allow for dangerous head entrapment; b. FDA recommended space: less than 4 ¾ inches; 3. Zone 3: Between the rail and the mattress; a. This area is the space between the inside surface of the bed rail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs by ensuring call lights were in reach at all times for two residents (Resident #31 and #70), in a review of 23 sampled residents, and failed to accommodate Resident #31's need for an alternative means to contact staff when the resident could not physically use the type of call light provided in his/her room. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated policy, Use of Call Light, showed the following: -When providing care to residents, be sure to position the call light conveniently for the resident's use; -Be sure all call lights are placed on the bed at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. 1. Review of Resident #31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility, dated 12/19/23, showed the following: -The resident was cognitively intact; -He/She had functional limited range of motion to bilateral upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan, specific to the resident, for one resident (Resident #27), in a review of 23 residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility undated policy for comprehensive care plans showed the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that included measurable goals and time frames would be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The comprehensive care plan would be based on a thorough assessment that included, but was not limited to, the minimum data set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility); -A well developed care plan was designed to prevent avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels or otherwise clarifying why another goal takes precedence, manage risk factors to the extent possible or indicating the limits of such interventions, addressing ways to try to preserve and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an order for oxygen use and maintain equipment according to the facility policy for two residents (Residents #28 and #54), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the undated facility policy, Physician Orders, showed the oxygen orders include the specific rate of flow, route, and rationale. Review of the undated facility policy, Cleaning Guidelines-Oxygen Equipment, showed tubing, masks, and cannulas used with oxygen therapy should be replaced monthly and PRN (as needed) and marked with date and initials. Review of the undated facility policy, Oxygen Administration, showed the following: -Set the flow meter to the rate ordered by the physician, then place the oxygen cannula on the resident; -At regular intervals, check and clean oxygen equipment, masks, tubing and cannulas; -At regular intervals, check liter flow contents of oxygen cylinder and fluid level in humidifier. 1. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #59), in a review of 23 sampled residents, was free of significant medication errors when staff failed to transcribe a new order to increase the resident's trazodone (a sedative/anti-depressant medication) and administered the incorrect dose for ten days. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility undated policy, Medication Administration Guidelines, showed residents are to receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies. Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which an authorized person, in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts, gives a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological to a resident. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the information. 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received food in the proper form in accordance with their physician's orders. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility policy, Types of Diets, dated May 2015, showed the following: -Pureed Diet: This diet is for the edentulous resident and residents with swallowing difficulties; -Foods are blended to mashed potato consistency or altered to meet the needs of the resident, using as little liquid as possible. Review of the facility's Order Report by Category from 2/18/24 through 3/18/24, printed by staff on 3/18/24, showed two residents had a physician-ordered pureed diet. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet menu for the lunch meal on 3/18/24 showed staff were to serve residents on a pureed diet the following items: -Pureed roasted new potatoes; -Pureed corn O'Brien; -Smooth thick gravy. Observation on 3/18/24 at 10:55 A.M. showed Dietary [NAME] G began to puree the corn. He/She placed an unmeasured amount of corn into the food processor. He/She obtained an unmeasured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and washed hands as indicated during the provision of care for two residents (Residents #11 and #12 ), in a review of 13 sampled residents and failed to implement a surveillance plan for identifying, tracking and monitoring communicable diseases and outbreaks among residents and staff. The facility failed to ensure staff were tracking and trending residents that were positive for COVID-19 (coronavirus disease, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) and failed to use proper personal protective equipment (PPE) during resident testing. The facility failed to ensure staff wore masks according to facility policy. The facility failed to ensure unvaccinated staff were screened upon entrance to the facility at the beginning of their work shifts, and failed to monitor and track the screenings. The facility failed to ensure staff testing was completed according to the facility policy for COVID-19 during an outbreak. The facility also failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of discharge with required information to the resident and/or resident representative for one additional resident (Resident #16), in a review of 13 sampled residents, when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital and denied the resident re-admission to the facility. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's undated policy Discharge/Transfer of Resident showed the following: -Purpose: To provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for aftercare of the resident; -Explain discharge guidelines and reason to resident and give copy of transfer and discharge notice as required, include resident representative; -The attending physician is required to write a discharge order, telephone orders are acceptable; -If transfer, obtain a physician order for transfer unless it is a 911 emergency; -Call ambulance for transfer; -Explain transfer and reason to the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-10-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served food at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy, In Room Dining Distribution, dated May 2015, showed at the time of service to the resident, food must be at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). (Inappropriate food temperatures are cause for a deficiency.) 1. During an interview on 10/12/20 at 10:57 A.M., Resident #58 said the food is always delivered cold; this is a consistent problem. During interview on 10/12/20 at 11:00 A.M., Resident #40 said the food was cold most of the time, especially breakfast. During an interview on 10/12/20 at 11:48 A.M., Resident #90 said the food was frequently served cold. During interview on 10/13/20 at 2:00 P.M., Resident #5 said the food frequently did not come to residents warm. During an interview on 10/13/20 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #18 said the food was never hot. Often the food was undercooked or burnt. During an interview on 10/14/20 at 8:46 P.M., Resident #85 said the baked potato for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were not stored directly on the floor, failed to label, date, and cover food items, failed to keep trash cans covered when not in use, failed to wear hair restraints in the kitchen, failed to maintain floors to be free of an accumulation of debris, failed to use sanitary practices when handling eating utensils, failed to use sanitary practices when preparing and serving ready to eat food items, failed to ensure food items were not prepared on the steam table, failed to hold food at the proper temperature on the steam table, failed to utilize proper handwashing procedures, failed to maintain a freezer at 0 degrees or colder (to keep food items frozen solid) and failed to ensure the ice machine was properly maintained. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy, Dietary Personnel Guidelines, dated May 2015, showed the following: -Personal Appearance: Employees of the dietary department handle the food that is eaten by everyone. For this reason, be conscious of clean and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-10-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage dumpsters were covered at all times. The facility census was 111. Observation on 10/12/20 at 10:20 A.M. showed the following: -The facility had two garbage dumpsters located outside the facility; -One of two dumpsters was uncovered and both lids were open; -The open dumpster contained garbage bags of trash and was mostly full. Observation on 10/12/20 at 2:56 P.M. showed the following: -The facility had two garbage dumpsters located outside the facility; -One of two dumpsters was uncovered and both lids were open; -The open dumpster was mostly full and contained garbage bags of trash. Observation on 10/15/20 at 8:15 A.M. showed the following: -One of two dumpsters was uncovered and one of two lids was open; -The open dumpster contained garbage bags and boxes piled high up over the edges of the dumpster; -The lid would not properly close due to the large amount of garbage inside. During an interview on 10/13/20 at 2:10 P.M., the facility's consultant dietician said the dumpster lids should be closed when not in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report to the state survey agency three known incidents of resident to resident sexual abuse as required within two hours of the alleged sexual abuse allegation when staff witnessed resident (Resident #92) on top of a resident (Resident #33) attempting to have sexual intercourse, failed to report the resident groped another resident's breasts and placed his/her hands down the resident's pants. The facility also failed to report multiple staff witnessed incidents of one resident (Resident #51), groping one resident (Resident #33) in a sample of 27 residents and two additionally sampled residents (Resident#70, and #45). Further review showed the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse within two hours of the reported allegation to the state survey agency for one resident (Resident #59). The facility certified census was 111. Review of the facility undated facility policy, titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete investigations as the facility policy directed for allegations of abuse, that failed to prevent further abuse involving eight residents (Resident #33, #40, #45, #51, #59, #70, #92, and #109) in a review of 27 sampled residents, for the protection of the residents'. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility undated facility policy, titled Abuse Prohibition Protocol Manual showed the following: -It was the policy of the facility that each resident would be free from abuse. Abuse could include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion. The resident would also be free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Additionally, resident would be protected from abuse, neglect and harm while they were residing at the facility. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer with required information to the resident and/or resident representative for one resident (Resident #93) in a review of 27 sampled residents, two additional residents (Residents #114, and #216), and one closed record (Resident #117) when the facility initiated transfer to the hospital. The facility also failed to notify the ombudsman of facility initiated transfer/discharges to the hospital from March through October 2020. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility document Emergency Transfer Notice showed an example of a written letter which read in part: This letter is to serve as your emergency notice of transfer from (facility name) due to your need for urgent medical care which cannot be met in the facility. Federal Regulation states in relevant part that Notice must be made as required by the resident's urgent medical needs. You can receive more information on the discharge process from the State Long Term Care Ombudsman listed below. Example had space for facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and resident representatives of their bed hold policy, or the duration of their bed hold at the time of transfer to the hospital for one resident (Resident #93) in a review of 27 sampled residents, three additional residents (Resident #114 and #216). The facilty census was 111. Review of the facility policy Bed Hold Guidelines, undated, showed: This facility will notify all residents, and /or their representative of the bed hold policy guidelines. This notification shall be given: 1. Upon admission to the facility, 2. At the time of the transfer to the hospital or leave; and 3. At the time of non-covered therapeutic leave. It is strictly voluntary for the resident or resident representative to reserve the room and pay a bed hold. If the resident or resident representative wants to hold the bed, a signed authorization of the Bed Hold Selection Notice must be obtained with each physician approved hospitalization or therapeutic leave of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement, develop, maintain, and update a plan of care consistent with residents' specific condition, needs, and risks for four of 27 sampled residents (Resident #60, #73, #97, and #463) and one additional resident (Resident #13). The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy Care Plan Comprehensive, from Nursing Guidelines Manual, March, 2015 showed the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frame will be developed to meet he resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff; -Assessment of each resident is an ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition; -The IDT is responsible for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for five residents (Residents #10, #13, #79, #85, and #302), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility failed to administer medications according to physician orders for Residents #10, #13, #79, and #85; failed to follow instructions to rinse Resident #302's mouth following administration of a steroid inhaler; and failed to ensure extended release medication was not broken or crushed prior to administration to Resident #79. The facility census was 95. Record review of the facility's undated policy for personalized medication schedule showed the following: -The facility should support safe and accurate medication administration for residents who elect to choose the time they take their medications and participate in the facility's Personalized Medication Schedule Program (the program); -The medication frequency and administration window: Three times per day (TID) minimum 4 hours apart from 4:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.; -The nurse or medication assistant should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided 14 residents (Resident #4, #18, #26, #43, #52, #56, #58, #69, #73, #80, #90, #93, #97 and #463) of 27 sampled residents that were unable to perform their own activities of daily living (ADL), the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy for ADLs from Nursing Guidelines Manual dated March of 2015 showed no documentation that directed staff when to assist residents with ADLs such as bathing, shaving, oral hygiene, and basic grooming. Review of the facility's policy for bathing (tub/whirlpool) from Nursing Guidelines Manual dated March of 2015 showed the purpose of bathing was to maintain skin integrity, comfort, and cleanliness. Review of the facility policy, Nails, Care of (fingers and toes) dated 3/15 showed the purpose was to provide cleanliness, comfort and prevent the spread of infection. Note: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents ( Resident #13, #43, #56, #110) in a review of 27 sampled residents, who had orders for restorative therapy received therapy as ordered. The facility census was 111. During interview on 10/20/20 at 5:30 P.M. the Director Of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy for the restorative nursing program, or a policy for prevention of contractures (shortening or hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). 1. Review of Resident #43's Face Sheet, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Functional Maintenance Program, dated 6/26/19, showed the following: - Maintain range of motion and mobility of BUE(bilateral upper extremities) and BLE (bilateral lower extremities); -Sustained stretching of hamstrings and gastrocs 2 sets of 10 holding for 30 seconds each; -Balloon volley or card reaching at various heights; -Three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and reassess the safety and effectiveness of 1/8th length bed rails in use for three residents (Resident #52, #93, and #97) and 1/4 length bed rail for one resident (Resident #56) in a review of 27 sampled residents who had bed rails in place on their beds. The facility census was 111. During interview on 10/20/20 at 5:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing said the facility did not have a side rail policy. Review of the Food and Drug Administration's Guide to Bed Safety, Bed Rails in Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Home Health Care: The Facts, revised April 2010, showed the following: -Patients who have problems with memory, sleeping, incontinence, pain, uncontrolled body movement, or who get out of bed and walk unsafely without assistance, must be carefully assessed for the best ways to keep them from harm; -Assessment by the health care team will help to determine how best to keep the patient safe; -Potential risks of bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY MO#00171896, MO#00172103, MO#00173330, MO#00173553, MO#00177333, MO#00177375 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs for 14 residents (Resident #4, #18, #26, #43, #56, #58, #69, #73, #90, #93, #97, #104 #110 and #463), in a review of 27 sampled residents and for one additional resident (Resident #13). Staff failed to provide routine showers to ensure good personal hygiene and prevent body odors, failed to respond timely to call lights, and failed to provide restorative therapy when the restorative aide (RA) was pulled to work as a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) and was unable to complete duties for the restorative therapy nursing program. The facility census was 111. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated January 2020, showed it did not address the number of staff needed to meet resident needs. Review of the Facility Staffing Sheet, undated, showed the following staff needed: -Day shift- 3 licensed or registered nurses, 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each certified nurse aide (CNA) had no less than 12 hours of in-service education per year based on their individual performance review, calculated by hire date. The facility identified 14 CNA's employed by the facility for more than a year. Four CNAs were sampled and four out of four did not have the required 12 hours of in-service education. The facility census was 111. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated January 2020, showed the CNAs, at the least, required the mandated twelve in-service hours per year. 1. Review of CNA X's employee file and training log, showed the following: -Date of hire (DOH) 3/27/19 ; -Did not include evidence of any completed education. 2. Review of CNA E's employee file and training log, showed the following: -DOH 5/29/19; -Did not include evidence of any completed education. 3. Review of CNA F's employee file and training log, showed the following: -DOH 4/4/17 ; -Did not include evidence of any completed education. 4. Review of CNA H's employee file and training log, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to administer medication with an error rate of less than five percent (%) for one resident (Resident #97) of 27 sampled residents and two additional residents (Resident #102 and #271). There were 27 opportunities for errors with three errors, which resulted in an error rate of 11.11%. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration from Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March of 2015 showed the following: -Medications are given to benefit a resident's health as ordered by the physician; -Read the label three times before administering medication to the resident: first when comparing the label with the medication sheet, second when setting up the medication, and third when preparing to administer medication to the resident; -Administer medication; -Record the medication given on the medication sheet. 1. Review of Resident #97's Physician Order Sheets (POS), dated October 2020, showed an order for FreshKote 2.7-2%, (a lubricating eye drop for dry eye syndrome) instill 1 drop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served the correct portion sizes for residents on regular, mechanical soft, and pureed diets as directed by the dietary spreadsheet for the lunch meal on 10/12/20. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy, Dining Services Department, dated May 2015, showed the purpose of the department is to provide a program that meets the nutritional needs of all residents. Standardized methods are practiced in the preparation and presentation of regular, texture altered and/or therapeutic diets in accordance with the attending physician's orders. Review of the facility policy, Food Preparation and Distribution, dated May 2015, showed measured utensils are used to serve proportions as described on menu. 1. During an interview on 10/12/20, at 11:30 A.M., Resident #91 said he/she did not get enough food. He/She said the portion sizes were so small. If he/she ordered the alternate, half the time staff would not give him/her the sides, so he/she just got a sandwich or hot dog for his/her entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with nourishing, well-balanced diet, taking into consideration each resident's preferences. The facility failed to respect each resident's right to make choices about his/her diet and be provided with acceptable alternative choices or substitutions. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy, Dining Service, dated May 2015, showed this facility will serve each resident nutritious food properly prepared and appropriately seasoned, in accordance with the physician's order and as recommended by the National Research Council. Review of the facility policy, Dining Services Department, dated May 2015, showed the following: -The purpose of the department is to provide a program that meets the nutritional needs of all residents. Standardized methods are practiced in the preparation and presentation of regular, texture altered and/or therapeutic diets in accordance with the attending physician's orders; -Consideration is given to the resident's physical, psychological and social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to permit entry of hospice providers into the facility to provide direct care for one resident (Resident #52), who was to receive hospice services and did not allow new contracts for provision of hospice care for any other resident considering hospice. The facility census was 111. 1. Observation on 10/12/20, at 10:10 A.M., showed a sign at the facility's designated COVID (Coronavirus Disease 2019 - COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) entrance screening station, that read, Hospice staff is not allowed in the building without approval. During an interview on 10/15/20 at 12:07 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said hospice services were not allowed in the facility due to COVID and the facility was not allowing any new hospice contracts (for additional residents to receive services). There were currently three residents at the facility that were on hospice from before COVID. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program during a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, by not providing a safe environment for residents. The facility failed to maintain a surveillance log monitoring symptoms and testing for residents and staff. The facility also failed to complete a COVID-19 assessment on one resident (Resident #22), who was exhibiting symptoms that were not identified by the facility and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. The facility also failed to follow transmission based precautions for one resident (Resident #35) and one additional resident (Resident #7) who were exhibiting respiratory symptoms and were tested for COVID-19. The facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene after direct resident contact and change gloves during direct resident personal care for three additional residents (Resident #107,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four residents (Resident #52, #56, #93, and #97) of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 111. During interview on 10/20/20 at 5:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing said the facility did not have a side rail policy. Review of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Guide to Bed Safety, Bed Rails in Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Home Health Care: The Facts, revised April 2010, showed the following: -Between 1985 and January 1, 2009, 803 incidents of patients caught, trapped, entangled or strangled in beds with rails were reported to the U.S. FDA; -Of those reported 480 died and 138 had non-fatal injuries; -Most patients were frail, elderly or confused; -Potential risks of bed rails may include strangulation, suffocation, bodily injury or death when patients or parts of their body are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not make notification to responsible parties, including next of kin and the primary care physician, for one resident (Resident #13) in a review of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy Condition Change, Resident dated 3/15 showed the purpose was to observe, record and report any condition change to the attending physician so that proper treatment can be implemented. Guidelines: After all resident falls, injuries or changes in physical or mental function, monitor. Have someone stay with the resident while the nurse is calling the attending physician, if necessary. Complete an incident, accident or risk management report per facility guidelines. Notify resident's responsible party. Monitor resident's condition frequently until stable. Notify physician of condition change, need for treatment orders and/or medication order changes. 1. Review of Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/5/20 showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor one resident (Resident #98) in a sample of 27 residents, who the facility identified as wandered and at risk for elopement, who exited the facility without staff knowledge. Another resident heard Resident #98 yelling for help from outside and alerted staff. The resident was found on the ground in a puddle and cold. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy Elopement-Missing Resident dated 3/15 showed staff were to determine when resident was last seen and by whom, description of clothing and where they were last seen. Notify all departments and begin a thorough search of the facility and grounds, including bathrooms, closets, storage areas and crawl spaces. Search streets and neighborhood adjacent to the facility. Notify the Director of Nursing and Administrator, attending physician. Notify the responsible party and request notification if resident makes contact with them. If absence exceeds 30 minutes, notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one dialysis resident (Resident #13) in a review of three sampled dialysis residents, by not completing and documenting a daily weight as ordered by the physician and failing to properly assess and document the resident's dialysis access site. The facility census was 111. Review of facility policy for care of a resident receiving dialysis from the Nursing Guidelines Manual dated March, 2015 showed the following: -Staff would utilize the following guidelines to provide care for a resident that was receiving dialysis; -Care for the AV shunt/fistula/graft (connection between an artery and a vein that is made for dialysis access) included to feel for the thrill sensation (rumbling sensation that can be felt to determine good blood flow rate) daily, monitor for signs of infection, watch for bleeding after dialysis, and inspection of the access for redness, swelling, or warmth; -At the AV site, feel for a pulse. The pulse is the blood flow through the access; -Nursing staff would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-28 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #10) on a vegetarian diet (regular with no meat) with nourishing and palatable food items in accordance with the spreadsheet menu. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy, Dining Service, dated May 2015, showed this facility will serve each resident nutritious food properly prepared and appropriately seasoned, in accordance with the physician's order and as recommended by the National Research Council. Review of the facility's policy, Dining Services Department, dated May 2015, showed the following: -The purpose of the department is to provide a program that meets the nutritional needs of all residents. Standardized methods are practiced in the preparation and presentation of regular, texture altered and/or therapeutic diets in accordance with the attending physician's orders; -Consideration is given to the resident's physical, psychological and social needs. Recognition is also given to the resident's individual eating habits, which are sometimes influenced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for residents. The facility census was 107. 1. Observation on 01/07/19 from 10:00 A.M. through 2:15 P.M. showed the following: -The main dining area had a persistent urine odor; -A round ceiling vent, in shower room [ROOM NUMBER] by the front nurse's station, had a heavy buildup of a black mold-like substance. A 4 inch by 6 inch ceiling vent was covered in a thick layer of dust; -A round ceiling vent in the 300 hall dirty utility room was covered with a black mold-like substance; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a strong urine odor (no residents were in the room at the time of the observation); -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a strong feces smell (no residents were in the room at the time of the observation); -The bathroom light in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not turn on. Observation on 01/08/19 from 7:34 A.M. through 12:00 P.M. showed the following: -The ceiling vent in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a grievance policy and procedure that included all required components; failed to act promptly upon the grievances identified by the resident council; failed to provide the members of the resident council with responses, actions and rationale taken regarding their concerns; and failed to document and communicate their response to formal written grievances submitted by two residents (Resident #2 and #87), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's policy Resident Grievances, dated April 2006, showed the following: -A complaint must be in writing and contain the name and address of the person filing it; -The Section 504 Coordinator (or designee) shall conduct an investigation of the complaint to determine validity. This investigation may be informal, but it must be thorough, affording all interested persons an opportunity to submit evidence relevant to the complaint. The Section 504…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene, prevent body odor, oral (mouth) care and showers for seven of 23 sampled residents (Residents #4, #5, #50, #58, #60, #63 and #100), who were unable to perform their own activities of daily living. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's Perineal Care policy from the Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Purpose: To cleanse the perineum and prevent infection and odor; -For female perineal care: Wet a washcloth and make a mitt with it. Apply soap lightly. Use one gloved hand to stabilize and separate the labia, with the other hand wash front to back. Rinse and pat dry; -For male perineal care: Follow the above instructions for female perineal care but instead wash the pubis and penis. If uncircumcised, pull back foreskin of penis and wash. Carefully dry and return foreskin to normal position. Make sure the shaft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition two residents (Residents #5 and #60), who were at risk for developing pressure ulcers; failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to a promote healing and prevent infection for one resident with a pressure ulcer (Resident #5); and failed to report newly identified pressure ulcers and obtain treatment orders for one resident (Resident #40), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers; quick reference guide, Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel: 2009 showed the following: -Ongoing assessment of the skin is necessary to detect early signs of pressure damage; -Repositioning should be considered in all at-risk individuals, repositioning should be undertaken to reduce the duration and magnitude of pressure over vulnerable areas of the body; -In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to consistently implement and modify interventions as necessary, in accordance with current standards of practice, to reduce the risk of falls for three residents (Residents #4, #5, and #47), who had a history of falls. Facility staff failed to use appropriate transfer technique with a gait belt during a transfer for one resident (Resident #60), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's Fall Prevention Policy, dated June 2006, showed the following: -A resident fall occurs when the resident unexpectedly or in an unplanned manner sustains bodily contact with the floor. A fall may occur during transfers assisted by nursing personnel who are unable to maintain control of the transfer, therefore slipping the resident to the floor; -When a resident is found on the floor and there is no witness to the event, it must be assumed that the resident fell; -If a resident is determined to be at ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 107. 1. During an interview on 1/7/19 at 5:26 P.M., Resident #49 said he/she ate all meals in his/her room. The meals were always cold when he/she received the meal tray. The resident did not want to eat cold food and would sometimes not eat due to the cold temperature of the food making it unappetizing. During an interview on 1/8/19 at 7:55 A.M., Resident #24 said the food in the facility was often served cold. He/she ate meals in the dining room. The resident said sometimes he/she would order a salad to avoid being served cold foods that should be served hot. 2. Observations on 1/7/19 at 01:27 P.M. of the test tray provided after the last resident was served showed the temperature of the meatloaf was 114 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the temperature of the spinach was 116 degrees F. All temperatures were taken with a calibrated, analog, metal stem-type thermometer. Observations on 1/8/19 at 01:35 P.M. of the test tray provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer residents a daily bedtime snack. Three of nine residents (Resident #17, #65, and #84) participating in group interview and three additional residents (Resident #30, #58 and #722) reported snacks were not offered on a routine basis at the facility. The census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's policy Bedtime Snacks, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Purpose: Offer/provide all residents a snack at bedtime as desired; -The dietary department will provide snacks for all residents according to the menu; -The snack cart will be delivered to the nurse's station prior to closing the kitchen; -An aide on the evening shift will be assigned to pass the hydration cart and snacks at bedtime; -The aide assigned will take the hydration cart to each resident room and offer each resident a snack and a drink from the cart; -At the end of the snack/hydration pass, the cart will be returned to the kitchen. 2. During the group interview on 1/8/19 at 3:00 P.M., residents said following: -Resident #17 said staff put snacks at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands when indicated by professional standards of practice during personal care for three residents (Residents #5, #40 and #60 ), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility staff failed to ensure infection control measures were appropriately followed when obtaining blood samples to test blood sugar levels and failed to properly sanitize the glucometer (a device that is used to evaluate blood glucose levels), between use for two residents (Residents #24 and #84). The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility's policy on gloves from the Nursing Guidelines Manual, dated March 2015, showed the following: -Wear gloves when it can be reasonably anticipated that hands will be in contact with mucous membranes, non-intact skin, any moist body substances (blood urine, feces, wound drainage, oral secretions, sputum, vomitus, or items/surfaces soiled with these substances) and or persons with a rash. Gloves must be changed between residents and between contacts with different…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-15 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the corridor was equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side of the hall. The facility census was 107. Observation on 01/07/19 from 10:00 A.M. through 2:30 P.M., during the life safety code tour of the facility, showed the following: -The handrail by the medical records office was loose, causing the handrail to move back and forth; -Two handrails by the back nurse's station were loose; -The handrail by the assistant director of nursing's office was loose, causing the handrail to move back and forth; -The handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose, causing the handrail to move back and forth. Observation on 01/08/19 from 7:34 A.M. through 12:00 P.M., during the life safety code tour of the facility, showed the following: -The handrail by the laundry area was loose, causing the handrail to move back and forth; -The handrails on both sides of room [ROOM NUMBER] were loose, causing the handrail to move back and forth; -The handrail by room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin according to the manufacturer's recommendations for three different types of insulin pens, for two residents (Residents #24 and #84 ), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving their full dose of ordered insulin. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for use for the Novolog (insulin) FlexPen (injection cartridge device) showed the following: -Before each injection, small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use; -To avoid injection air and to ensure proper dosing, turn the dose selector to two units; -Hold the Novolog FlexPen with the needle pointing up; -Tap the cartridge gently with your finger a few times to make any air bubbles collect at the top of the cartridge; -Keep the needle pointing upwards and press the push button all the way in; -A drop of insulin should appear at the needle tip, if not, change the needle and repeat the procedure no more than six times; -If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals in accordance with one resident's (Resident #208) preferences. The facility census was 107. 1. Review of the facility diet orders, dated 1/7/19, showed Resident #208 had a physician's order for a regular vegan diet (a diet consisting of all plant based foods; consuming no animal or animal byproducts including egg or dairy). Review of the posted facility menu showed the meal for 1/7/19 was meatloaf, gravy, baked potato, buttered spinach, and a dinner roll. No vegan substitute was posted. Review of the facility spreadsheet for 1/7/19 showed residents on a vegan diet were to receive one cup of vegetable chili. Observations on 1/7/19 between 12:56 P.M. and 1:25 P.M. during meal service showed staff served Resident #208 a grilled cheese sandwich. During interview on 1/7/19 at 1:40 P.M., the dietary supervisor said residents on a vegan diet can have a grilled cheese or a salad with egg on it as a meal and protein substitute. During interview on 1/8/19 at 1:55 P.M., Dietary B said staff does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to notify three residents (Resident #4, #24, and #48), in a review of 23 sampled residents, or their representatives in writing of transfer to the hospital, including the reasons for the transfer. The facility failed to send a copy of the transfer notice to a representative of the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated policy, Discharge/Transfer of Resident, showed the following: -Explain transfer and reason to the resident and/or representative and give copy of signed transfer or discharge notice to the resident and/or representative or person responsible for care; -If emergency transfer, transfer or discharge notice form may be completed later, but as soon as possible; -Explain and give copy of bed hold form to the resident and/or representative. 1. Review of Resident #48's face sheet showed his/her family member was his/her responsible party. Review of the resident's nurse notes, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold with required information to the resident and/or resident representative when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital for three residents (Resident #4, #24, and #48), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated policy, Discharge/Transfer of Residents, showed staff was to explain and give a copy of the bed hold form to the resident and/or representative. 1. Review of Resident #48's face sheet showed his/her family member was his/her responsible party. Review of the resident's nurses notes, dated 11/17/22 at 2:43 PM, showed the physician gave the order to send the resident to the emergency department. Review of the resident's census showed the resident returned to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the resident's nurse notes, dated 6/4/23 at 1:45 PM, showed the nurse received a new order to send the resident to the hospital emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-01-15 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to electronically encode and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff) assessments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 14 days of completion as required for five residents (Residents #1, #105, #108, #258, and #720), in a review of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. 1. During an interview on 1/10/19 at 1:05 P.M., the MDS coordinator said he/she has been the MDS coordinator since November 2018. The previous MDS coordinator no longer worked in the facility. The MDS Coordinator said he/she was not aware of any MDS assessments not being transmitted for residents. The MDS coordinator did not currently have computer access to encode and transmit MDS data to CMS. He/she said a corporate nurse had been submitting the MDS assessments to the CMS system since November. 2. Review of the CMS Submission and Final Validation Report, provided by the facility on 1/15/19, showed the following: -Resident #702's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$104,685 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $84,256 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
  • $20,429 — penalty dated 2024-04-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-13 for 33 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-15 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Camdenton Windsor EstatesCamdenton, MO 1 of 5Crestview HomeBethany, MO 1 of 5Grand River Health CareChillicothe, MO 1 of 5Joplin GardensJoplin, MO 1 of 5Lebanon North Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 1 of 5Lewis & Clark GardensSaint Charles, MO 1 of 5Maryville Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterMaryville, MO 1 of 5Pacific Care CenterPacific, MO 1 of 5Parkside ManorColumbia, MO 1 of 5Pin Oaks Living CenterMexico, MO 1 of 5River City Living CommunityJefferson City, MO 1 of 5Rocky Ridge ManorMansfield, MO 1 of 5South Hampton Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterColumbia, MO 1 of 5Springfield VillaSpringfield, MO 1 of 5Strafford Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterStrafford, MO 1 of 5Villa At Blue Ridge, TheColumbia, MO 1 of 5Warrenton ManorWright City, MO 1 of 5Woodland Hills Healthcare And RehabilitationJacksonville, AR 2 of 5Brookhaven Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Carroll HouseCarrollton, MO 2 of 5Current River Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterDoniphan, MO 2 of 5Eldon Nursing & RehabEldon, MO 2 of 5Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterForsyth, MO 2 of 5Fulton Nursing & RehabFulton, MO 2 of 5Grandview Healthcare CenterWashington, MO 2 of 5Lebanon South Nursing & RehabLebanon, MO 2 of 5Point Lookout Nursing & RehabHollister, MO 2 of 5Shepherd Of The Hills Living CenterBranson, MO 2 of 5Sunset HomeMaysville, MO 2 of 5Willard Care CenterWillard, MO 2 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWindsor, MO 3 of 5Claru Deville Nursing CenterFredericktown, MO 3 of 5Glasgow GardensGlasgow, MO 3 of 5Glendale Gardens Nursing & RehabSpringfield, MO 3 of 5Hartville Care CenterHartville, MO 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing & RehabHermitage, MO 3 of 5Maries ManorVienna, MO 3 of 5St James Living CenterSaint James, MO 4 of 5Clearview Nursing CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Crowley Ridge Care CenterDexter, MO

Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LINCOLN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 01/01/2008
LINCOLN, JUDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2008
CONOVER, JANICEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2004
LTC MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 2%Other / private 12%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$221per resident / day
operating cost
$6,723per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$175per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265702. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next