Fulton Nursing & Rehab
1510 Bluff Street, Fulton, MO 65251 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (573) 642-0202 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-02)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.4% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.6% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.3% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.3% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.0% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 37.3% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.4% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 66.3 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.86 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to ensure two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) remained free from sexual abuse when Resident #1 raised his/her shirt, and Resident #2 touched his/her chest inappropriately. The facility census was 34. The administrator was notified on 10/15/24 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 9/30/24. On 9/29/24, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B, notified Registered Nurse (RN) A he/she witnessed Resident #1 in Resident #2's room. He/She reported he/she observed Resident #1 with his/her shirt raised, and Resident #2 touched Resident #1's chest inappropriately. Staff immediately separated the residents, assessed the residents for injuries, moved Resident #1 to a secured unit, and notified the required parties and agencies. The Director of Nursing (DON) inserviced all staff on duty, and all staff prior to working, on new interventions, assessing residents for the ability to consent to sexual activity, and abuse and neglect policies and procedures. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation Policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments ordered by the physician for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident and #3) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 69.the purpose is prevent and treat further break down of skin or pressure ulcers. Treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers will vary depending on the orders of the attending physician. The nurse is responsible for carrying out the treatment as ordered by the attending physician and for implementing measures to prevent pressure ulcers. 2.Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 10/31/25, showed staff assessed the resident as severely cognitively impaired and at risk for developing pressure ulcers.Review of the physician order sheet (POS), dated February 2026 and March 2026, showed the physician ordered weekly skin assessments. Review of the resident's weekly skin assessments showed did not contain documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to address and update care plans to address behaviors for three resident (Resident #1, #2 and #3) of three sampled residents and failed to update care plans at least quarterly in conjunction with the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument), to provide interventions to meet individual needs for two residents (Resident #2 and #3) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 68.1. Review of the facility's policy, Care Plan Comprehensive, undated, showed:-An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being;-Assessment of each resident is ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition;-Applying current standards of practice in the care planning processes;-The interdisciplinary care plan team is responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential spread of Covid-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2) and other infections, when staff failed to follow acceptable infection control practices for Covid-19. The facility failed to separate five residents (Resident #1, #3, #7, #10 and #12) who tested positive for COVID-19 from five residents (Resident #2, #4, #8, #9, and #11) who had tested negative for COVID-19, which placed the Covid-19 negative residents at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 due to prolonged exposure. The facility census was 68. 1. Review of the facility's Outbreak Management: SARS-COV-2 Long Term Facilities policy, revised on 5/15/23, showed staff are directed as follows: -Place a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-COV-2 infection in a single room. The door should be kept closed (if safe to do so). Ideally, the patient should have a dedicated bathroom;-If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The facility's census was 67.1. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy in regard to RN services. Review of the Facility Assessment, revised 08/27/25, showed the facility should staff at least one RN for eight hours per day, seven days a week. Review of the facility's RN Staffing assignments, dated 09/01/25 through 09/30/25, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day on 09/01/25, 09/05/25, 09/06/25, and 09/21/25. Review of the facility's RN Staffing assignments, dated 10/01/25 through 10/21/25, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day on 10/04/25, 10/05/25, 10/18/25, and 10/19/25. During an interview on 10/21/25 at 2:29 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he/she is aware of the requirement to have an RN in the facility eight consecutive hours daily, and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) or the administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement complete policies and procedures for the inspection, testing and maintenance of the facility's water systems to inhibit the growth of waterborne pathogens and reduce the risk of an outbreak of Legionnaire's Disease (LD) (a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) caused by Legionella bacteria, which places all residents at risk of exposure which could lead to illness. Facility staff failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control practice that requires staff to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (gowns, gloves and/or eye protection) and/or failed to have EBP signs posted for 5 residents (Resident #18, #45, #52, #53, and #71), and failed to review Infection Prevention and Control policies annually. The facility census was 62 with a capacity of 100. 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality, Safety and Oversight (QSO) 17-30, dated 06/02/17 and revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, facility staff failed to maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (the monitoring for appropriate antibiotic use and effectiveness to improve outcomes and prevent development of antibiotic resistance). The facility census was 62.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, undated, showed:-The Infection Preventionist (IP) will be the hub of the program and have the knowledge and expertise to develop, implement and monitor the Antibiotic Stewardship Program;-The IP/Designee will be responsible to audit the clinical assessment documentation at the time of the antibiotic prescription;-The IP/Designee will be responsible for auditing of the completeness of antibiotic prescribing documentation to include dose, route, start date, end date, days of therapy and indication;-The IP/Designee will track C. difficile (inflammation of the colon caused by bacteria Clostridium difficile resulting in severe diarrhea), and antibiotic resistant infections; and develop a quarterly report for the Quality Assurance meeting.2. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to delegate an Infection Preventionist (IP) with qualifications by education, training, experience or certification to perform the role. The facility census was 62.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, undated, showed the IP is qualified to conduct infection control and prevention activities as a result of education, training and experience. He/She will complete the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Long Term Care Infection Preventionist training module.Review Registered Nurse (RN) W's, personnel records showed he/she completed two of 19 continuing education units of the CDC Long Term Care Infection Preventionist training module on 05/15/24.During an interview on 06/25/25 at 10:21 A.M., RN W said he/she began the IP role May of 2024 and stepped down a few months ago because he/she was unable to fulfill the responsibilities of the role. RN W said he/she does not recall if he/she completed the CDC certification training. RN W said the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) is now the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to consistently document the code status as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) or Full Code - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ((CPR) an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing to restart a person's breathing and heartbeat) on the care plan, and/or Physician Order Sheet (POS) for four residents (Resident #18, #35, #47, and #53) out of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directive, undated, showed upon admission of a resident, the social services designee (SSD) will inquire of the resident, and/or his/her family members, about the existence of any written advanced directives. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record under the advance directive tab. 2. Review of Resident #18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered plan of care to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 10 residents (Resident #11, #18, #42, #45, #52, #53, #56, #58, #64, and #71) out of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Comprehensive, undated, showed: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The interdisciplinary care plan team with input from the resident, family, and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident; -The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the Minimum Data Set (MDS); -Assessment of each resident is an ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the plan of care for three resident's (Resident #15, #41, & #47) out of 25 sampled residents with changes in the resident's needs. The facility census was 62.1. Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan Comprehensive, undated, showed an individualized care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable, mental and psychosocial well-being. The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes but is not limited to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool. Assessment of each resident is an ongoing process, and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition. The resident's comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment MDS and Care Area Assessment (CAAs), process used to further investigate potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to document the required fall documentation and neurological assessments (an assessment completed to determine if the nervous system is impaired) for five residents (Resident #11, #35, #53, #58, and #71) out of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Condition Change, undated, showed: -The purpose is to observe, record, and report any condition change to the physician so that proper treatment can be implemented;-After all resident falls, injuries, or changes in physical or mental function, monitor the following: observe for lacerations, swelling, discoloration, convulsions, pain, personality changes, alterations in consciousness, incontinence, sensory disorder, weakness, speech disorder, balance, reflexes, bleeding, unequal pupils, dyspnea, flushing or cyanosis, abduction/adduction/shortening of extremities;-Obtain vital signs;-Have someone stay with the resident while the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to educate and provide influenza immunizations for two residents (Resident #42 and #50) and pneumococcal immunizations for three residents (Resident #42, #50 and #56) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 62.1. Review of the facility policy titled Immunization Recommendations for Long Term Care Facilities, undated, showed the resident's physician will be consulted and determine the level of risk and need for the vaccinations. Influenza vaccination is recommended annually for all residents. Pneumococcal vaccination will be administered according to state guidelines when determining vaccination status. Requirements for administering vaccinations include a physician order, consent and an information sheet with general information, risks and side effects.Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Adult Immunization Schedule by Age | Vaccines & Immunizations | CDC, dated 05/29/25, showed vaccines are recommended for those age [AGE] years…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment tool, for two residents (Resident #41 and #35) out of 25 sampled residents who were admitted to hospice services. The facility census was 62.1. Review of the policies provided by the facility did not show a policy for completion of a SCSA.Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual version 3.0, dated October 2024, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA), required Assessment Summary showed assessment time frames as follows:-A SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to check and date oxygen tubing for one resident (Resident #18) and failed to provide orders for one resident (Resident #42), who received continuous positive airway pressure, (CPAP- a treatment that keeps the airway open during sleep). The facility census was 62.1. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, undated, showed at regular intervals, check and clean oxygen equipment, masks, tubing, and cannulas; and place cannula tubing in a plastic bag attached to the concentrator when not in use. 2. Review of Resident #18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 05/07/25, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Received oxygen; -Diagnoses of sleep apnea (disorder characterized by interruptions in breathing during sleep), asthma, and respiratory failure (occurs when the lungs can't adequately oxygenate). Review of the resident's care plan, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis facility (a healthcare facility that provides dialysis treatment to individuals with kidney failure) and failed to document completion of dialysis care for one resident (Resident #18) of one sampled who received dialysis services. The census was 62. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis, Care of a Resident Receiving, undated, showed staff were directed to: -Care for the Artery Vein shunt/fistula/graft (a surgical connection between the artery and vein): -Keep the area clean and dry; -Feel for the thrill (a vibration that can be felt when you place your fingers over the fistula site) sensation daily and document in the resident record, if no thrill, notify the physician; -Inspect access for redness, swelling, or warmth; -Avoid excessive pressure on the puncture site after dialysis; -Watch for bleeding after dialysis and monitor for signs of infection;-Communication between the facility and dialysis unit: -The dialysis communication record will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to contact one resident's (Resident #3's) responsible party after the resident had a change in condition. The facility census 61. 1. Review of the facility's Notification of Physician policy, undated, showed staff are directed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or interested family member when there is a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status or a decision to transfer or discharge the resident form the facility. 2. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1/22/25, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive Impairment; -Diagnoses of dementia with agitation, Senile degeneration of brain, Schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, Vascular dementia with anxiety, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/3/25, showed staff assessed the resident exhibits significant behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to keep Resident #1 free from physical abuse when floor technician E aggresively pulled the residents wheelchair which resulted in the resident falling out of the wheelchair and on to the ground. The facility census was 58. The administrator was notified on 4/30/25 of past Non- Compliance, which occurred on 4/22/25, when staff reported the allegation. Staff immediately suspended floor technician E, assessed the resident for physical and psychological harm, conducted an investigation, in-serviced staff on abuse and neglect, and terminated the employee on 4/30/25. 1. Review of the abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property fact sheet, dated 2017, showed abuse is the deliberate inflection of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment, which results in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. This includes verbal, sexual, physical, or mental abuse, as well as abuse enabled through the use of technology. Examples include scolding, ignoring, ridiculing, or cursing a resident and rough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration for two (Resident #4 and #21) of five sampled residents. The facility staff failed to ensure all employees were screened for Tuberculosis ((TB) a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs), when staff failed to ensure a two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for TB) and annual PPD tests completed and documented as per policy and state law for three employees ( Dietary Aide O, Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) E , and Certified Medication Technician (CMT) P) out of 10 sampled employees . The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Medication, Administration Guidelines, showed the guidelines did not address hand hygiene between administration of medication between one resident and another resident, pouring tablets or pills out from a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when staff failed to maintain bathroom doorframes, sink counters, and floors in good repair. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy regarding environment. Review of the facility's housekeeper job description, dated May, 2006, showed housekeeping staff expectations include: - Clean floors, to include sweeping, dusting, damp/wet mopping, stripping, waxing, buffing, disinfection, etc; - Clean, wash, sanitize, and polish bathroom fixtures, ensure that water marks are removed from fixtures. Review of the facility's maintenance manager job description, dated May 2006, showed maintenance staff performs minor plumbing repairs, including unplugging, repairing, and replacing toilets, lavatories, and sinks and replacing faulty gate and ball valves. 2. Observation on 04/29/24 at 7:45 P.M., showed resident occupied room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital to the resident and/or resident's representative for three residents (Residents #14, #24, and #45) out of three sampled residents who were discharged to the hospital. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Bed Hold Guidelines, undated, showed the facility will notify all residents and/or their representative of the bed hold guidelines. This notification shall be given at the time of transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of Resident #14's medical record showed: -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 03/28/24; -Did not contain documentation staff notified the resident or the resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy at time of discharge. 3. Review of Resident #24's medical record showed: -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 04/09/24; -Did not contain documentation staff notified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0637 — patternAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to perform a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a federally mandated assessment tool, for one (Resident #37) of one resident who elected hospice and one (Resident #14) of six sampled residents who had a decline in their ability to feed self with supervision, transfer with substantial/maximum assistance and perform toilet hygiene. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's MDS and Care Planning guidelines, dated September 2013, showed it is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and any published interim RAI manual errata documents, as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS and establishing and maintaining resident care plans. Review of the RAI manual version 3.0 RAI, dated October 2023, Omnibus Budget Reconcilliation Act (OBRA)-required Assessment Summary showed assessment time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs for four (Resident #14, #20, #35, and #37) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Planning guidelines, dated September 2013, showed it is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and any published interim RAI manual errata documents, as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS and establishing and maintaining resident care plans. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual version 3.0 RAI, dated October 2023, showed: -Federal statute and regulations require nursing homes to conduct initial and periodic assessments for all their residents. The assessment information is used to develop, review, and revise the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of care when nursing staff did not obtain orders for water for one (Resident #14) out of one resident who received all hydration via gastric tube, failed to complete resident weights for three (Resident #6, #29, and #35) out of twelve sampled residents, failed to obtain wound measurements with weekly skin assessments for one resident (Resident #35) of three sampled residents with wounds. The facility staff document falls and fall follow-up for one (Resident #2) of two sampled residents. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Enteral Nutritional Therapy (tube feeding) policy, undated, showed to follow the feeding with the prescribed amount of water. 2. Review of Resident #14's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 05/01/24, showed: -On 03/28/24, Nothing by mouth; -On 03/29/24, Gastric feeding of Jevity 1.2 calories (a type of nutrition) 300 milliliters four times a day; -The POS did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide appropriate personal hygiene for three residents (Resident #28, #35, and #251) out of 12 sampled dependent residents, The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Daily Care Needs guidelines, undated, showed after meals staff are diected to wash hands and face of the residents and remove any food particles from resident clothing. 2. Review of Resident #28's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/09/24 showed staff assessed the resident as: -Moderately cognitively impaired; -Dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing, and personal hygiene; -Did not reject care; -Diagnosis of debility, heart disease, lung disease, and dementia. Review of the residents care plan, reviewed 11/27/23, showed staff assessed the resident required assistance for transfers, bathing dressing and grooming daily, may experience bladder incontinence related to muscle weakness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, facility staff failed to ensure residents environment remained safe from hazards when staff failed to safely propel three (Resident #8, #22, and #34) out of 12 sampled residents while in wheelchairs. Facility staff failed to provide two (Resident #14 and #36) out of two sampled residents safe mechanical transfers, and facility staff failed to safely store medications in one residents room (Resident #13). The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Wheelchair, Use of policy, undated, showed staff were directed to lower footrests and place resident's feet on footrests if used and position feet and legs in good body alignment. 2. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 01/30/24, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively impaired; -Required set-up assistance for wheelchair locomotion of 50 feet with 2 turns; -Independent wheeling 150 feet in wheelchair. Observation on 04/30/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure all resident's drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs when staff failed to ensure gradual dose reductions (GDR) were attempted for psychotropic medications for four (Resident #3, #12, #28, and #36) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Drug Review guidelines, undated, showed staff are instructed as follows: -All medication given to each resident will be reviewed on a monthly basis in order to review drug interactions, ensure adherence to stop orders, ensure accuracy in administration, and evaluate medications appropriate to diagnosis. -Problems identified shall be addressed according to need in consultation with physician. -Follow up on problems needs either the Director of Nursing's (DON's) or pharmacist's signature to show that the problem has been addressed. -Develop an interdisciplinary care plan to evaluate behavior pattern in relationship to current medication. -Notify physician of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to monitor and store medication in a safe and effective manner when staff did not dispose of expired medications and left resident's medication on top of the cart. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of he facility's Storage of Medications policy, undated, showed facility staff were directed as follows: -All medications for residents must be stored at or near the nurse's station in a locked cabinet, a locked medicine room, or one or more locked mobile medications carts; -No discontinued, out dated, or deteriorate drugs or biological may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing Pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines. 2. Observation on 05/01/24 at 8:29 A.M., showed the facility medication room contained: -One bottle of extra strength Acetaminophen/diphenhydramine HCI with an expiration date of 08/23; -Two bottles of Therma-M with an expiration date of 03/24; -Five bottles of mucus relief with an expiration date of 04/23; -One bottle of Zinc with an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Dietary Manager (DM) with the appropriate qualifications. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of facility policies showed staff did not provide a policy related to the qualifications of kitchen staff. 2. Review of the DM's personnel record showed the record did not contain documentation of when the DM assumed the DM role. The record did not contain documentation of previous food service experience or food service management certification. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 08:19 A.M., the DM said he/she was not certified yet, but was currently working on the certification and was about half way done. The Dietary Manager said he/she did not know all of the requirements. During an interview on 05/02/24 at 10:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the Dietary Manager should be certified, and if new to the job at the facility they thought he/she should be certified within four to six months. If the Dietary Manager is not certified, they may not know the guidelines, and residents may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure resident's personal information was protected when staff left residents' Electronic Health Records (EHR) open and unattended in public hallways. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Guidelines, undated, showed the record did not contain direction for protection of residents' privacy. 2. Observation on 04/30/24 at 8:49 A.M., showed Certified Medical Technician (CMT) A left the EHR screen with resident information on the screen unlocked in the hallway when he/she administered to a resident in their room. Observation on 04/30/24 at 8:51 A.M., showed CMT A left the EHR screen unlocked in the hallway with resident information on the screen when he/she adminsitered medication to a resident in their room. Observation on 04/30/24 at 9:05A.M., showed CMT A left the EHR screen unlocked in the hallway with resident information on the screen when he/she administered medication to a resident in their room. An unsecured box with drawers containing residents' medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete the required Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment, within the required timeframe for two (Residents #1, and #3) out of two sampled residents The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Planning guidelines, dated September 2013, showed it is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and any published interim RAI manual errata documents, as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS and establishing and maintaining resident care plans. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual version 3.0 RAI, dated October 2023, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA)-required Assessment Summary showed assessment time frames as follows: -admission (Comprehensive) MDS completion date no later than 14th calendar day of the resident's admission and submitted no later than 14 calendar days from the care plan completion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete the required Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment, within the required timeframe for two of four (Resident #18 and #30) sampled residents. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's MDS and Care Planning guidelines, dated September 2013, showed it is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and any published interim RAI manual errata documents, as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS and establishing and maintaining resident care plans. Review of the RAI manual version 3.0 RAI, dated October 2023, Omnibus Budget Reconcilliation Act (OBRA)-required Assessment Summary showed assessment time frames as follows: -Quarterly (Non-Comprehensive) MDS completion date not later than Assessment Reference Date (ARD) + 14 calendar days; -Quarterly assessment for a resident must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to correctly assess one resident (Resident #2) who received an anticoagulant (a blood thinning medication used to treat and prevent blood clots and to prevent stroke in people with atrial fibrillation medication) and failed to assess one resident (Resident #12) for their preferences and oral/dental status. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Planning guidelines, dated September 2013, showed it is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and any published interim RAI manual errata documents, as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS and establishing and maintaining resident care plans. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual version 3.0 RAI, dated October 2023, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA)-required Assessment Summary, Section N, showed instruction for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete neurological checks and fall follow up documentation for three (Resident #1, #2, & #3) of three residents who had a fall and failed to complete weekly skin assessments for two residents (Resident #4 and #5). The facility census was 41. 1. Review of the facility's Fall Champion Program, undated, showed the post fall follow up period is 72 hours which includes assessment and document of the resident's condition in healthcare tracking program Progress Notes and neurological checks. 2. Review of Resident # 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/23/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively intact; -No falls since admission or prior assessment. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 11/27/23, showed staff assessed the resident at risk for falls due to history of falls. Staff are directed to provide proper, well-maintained footwear with nonskid soles, adjust bed to lowest level, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they assessed residents using the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, no less frequently than once every three months for seven residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7). The facility census was 46. 1. Review of the Resident Assessment Manual (RAI), dated 10/1/17, showed the Quarterly assessment is an Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. As such, not all MDS items appear on the Quarterly assessment. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be not more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent OBRA assessment of any type are as follows: -Assessment Completion refers to the date that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Facility staff failed to maintain resident restrooms free of floor discolorations, missing toilet bolt covers and caulk at the base of the toilet. In addition, bathroom cabinets had laminate peeled off and drawers missing. The facility staff also failed to maintain resident rooms free of discolored floor tiles. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a Facility Maintenance Policy. Observation on 4/10/23 at 11:45 A.M., showed dark black/gray stains in and around the cracks in the bathroom tiles, rust colored discoloration around the toilet bowl, and missing caulk and bolts at the base of the toilet bowl in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on 4/10/23 at 11:49 A.M., showed two black skid marks, approximately 3/8 of an inch wide and three feet long in the middle the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on 4/10/23 at 11:51 A.M., showed a drawer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of care when they failed to weigh two residents (#4 and #41), check Depakote (to treat seizures, bipolar disorder or migraine headaches) levels for one resident (#11), and to take a blood pressure prior to administration of blood pressure medication for one resident (Resident #303) as ordered by the physician. Additionally, staff failed to failed to provide consistent documentation in regard to a resident's Advance Directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for one resident (Resident #20), and failed to ensure physician medications orders were signed for two residents (#31 and#40). The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the staff did not provide a policy for following physicians orders or for medication or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene for four residents (Resident #1, #2, #11, and #17) dependent on staff for care. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the staff did not provide a bath (shower) policy. 2. Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 2/23/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required limited assistance from one staff member for bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting; -Diagnoses of hemiplegia or hemiparesis; -Does not reject care; -No behaviors towards others; -Occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Review of the resident's care plan, dated March 2023 showed staff are directed to assist with showers at least two times per week, wash hair as needed (PRN), and provide nail care on bath days. Review of the resident's shower record, dated January 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's environment remained free of accident hazards when facility staff failed to ensure razors/sharps and hazardous chemicals were stored in safe manner not accessible to residents. In addition, facility staff failed to maintain the hot water temperature below 120 degrees Fahrenheit in the resident rooms. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility policy and procedure manual showed they did not have a policy for hazardous chemical storage, sharps storage for razors or nail clippers. Observation on 4/11/23 at 10:29 A.M., showed the 300 hall shower room unlocked and unattended with the following: -Two sharps containers, with the tops open contained uncovered disposable razors; -A can of shaving cream; -A bottle of body wash; -A mop bucket filled with dirty water and a mop; -A can of Spray Deodorant labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication orders were limited to 14 days unless specific duration and clinical rationale were provided for two residents (Resident #2, and #34), and failed to perform Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) on psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's Drug Review policy, undated, showed the following: All medication given to each resident will be reviewed on a monthly basis in order to: -Review drug interactions; -Evaluate medications appropriate to diagnosis; -Medications should not show unnecessary or excessive use and should have a diagnosis to support them; -The policy did not given direction for Gradual Dose Reductions. 2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1/6/23, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and effective manner, additionally staff failed to ensure two medications carts were locked at all times. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's Medications, Storage of, from Nursing Guidelines Manual, undated, directed staff as follows: -Drugs must be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, or carts; -An unattended medication cart must remain locked at all times. In the event the nurse is distracted from the task of passing medications by some unforeseen occurrence, the cart must be locked before leaving it, or secured in a locked medication room. 2. Observation on 4/12/23 at 11:00 A.M., showed the Certified Medication Technician (CMT)'s medication cart contained the following loose pills: -One small round yellow pill stamped with W40; -Half of a small oval white pill. During an interview on 4/12/23 at 11:04 A.M., CMT B said when they find loose pills in the medication carts they dispose of the pills into the locked trashcan on the side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants when staff failed to ensure all residents were screened for Tuberculosis (TB) (a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) when staff failed to ensure a two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for TB) was completed and documented as per the facility policy for three residents (#1, #11, and #34). The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility provided Screening for Tuberculosis in Long Term Care Facilities guideline, undated, showed the guidance directs staff as follows: -All residents new to long-term care who do not have documentation of a previous skin test reaction >10mm or a history of adequate treatment of tuberculosis infection or disease, shall have the initial test of a Mantoux PPD two-step skin test to rule out tuberculosis within one month prior to or one week…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written notice to residents or the resident's representatives regarding resident transfers to the hospital for two of two sampled residents (Resident # 20 and #27). The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's Discharge/Transfer of Resident Policy, undated, showed: -Purpose - To provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for the aftercare of the resident. -Equipment - Notice of Transfer or Discharge, if necessary -Guidelines - Explain discharge guidelines and reason and give copy of Transfer & Discharge Notice as required. Include resident representative. 2. Review of Resident #20's medical record showed the following: -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE]; -Returned to the facility on [DATE]; -Transferred to the hospital on 3/29/23; -Returned to the facility on 3/31/23; -Staff did not document they notified the resident and resident representative of the transfer. 3. Review of Resident #27's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for two sampled residents (Resident #20 and #27). The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's Discharge/Transfer of Resident Policy, undated, showed: -Purpose - To provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for the aftercare of the resident. -Equipment - Bed Hold Forms. -Guidelines - Explain discharge guidelines and reason and give copy of Transfer & Discharge Notice as required. Include resident representative. The Guidelines did not include mention of the Bed Hold Form. 2. Review of Resident #20's medical record showed the following: -Transferred to the hospital on 3/29/23; -Resident returned to the facility on 3/31/23; -Transferred to the hospital on [DATE]; -Resident returned to the facility on [DATE]; -Staff did not document they notified the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide orders for dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney), and have ongoing communication with the dialysis clinic for one resident (Resident #24) who received dialysis. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's Dialysis Care of a resident receiving policy, undated, showed staff are directed as follows: Communication between the Facility and Dialysis Unit: -The Dialysis Communication Record will be sent with the resident on each dialysis visit; -All care concerns in the last 24 hours will be addressed, including last medications given and facility contact person; -The dialysis unit will complete the lower portion of the report to include weight prior to and after, any dialysis, any labs completed, medication given, follow up information and any new physician orders; -The lower portion will be signed by the dialysis nurse and returned to the facility; -The records will be maintained in the medical record. 2. Review of Resident #24's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-06-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked, by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, and on a daily basis. The facility staff failed to keep the required daily staffing records for eighteen months. The facility census was 62.1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed they did not contain a policy for the Nurse Staff posting. 2. Review of the facility's daily nurse staffing records showed the record did not contain 18 months of nurse staff posting.3. Observation on 06/24/25 at 10:43 A.M., showed a sign on the wall, next to the medication storage room behind the nurses desk read Nursing Please fill out midnight census worksheets. Observation on 06/24/25 at 11:35 A.M., showed facility staff did not post the required nurse staff information in the facility. Observation on 06/25/25 at 10:35 A.M., showed facility staff did not post the required nurse staff information in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-02 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure three most recent years of survey results were posted and readily accessible to residents, family member or representatives of residents. The facility census was 44. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for required postings or survey posting. 2. Observation on 04/29/24 at 9:59 P.M., showed the facility did not have a copy of the federal survey results accessible to the resident, family members, or representatives of residents. 3. Observation on 04/30/24 at 7:48 A.M., showed the facility did not have a copy of the federal survey results accessible to the resident, family members, or representatives of residents. 4. Observation on 05/01/24 at 3:40 P.M., showed the facility did not have a copy of the federal survey results accessible to the residents, family members, or representatives of residents. 5. During an interview on 05/02/24 at 8:42 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F said he/she is not sure where the survey is posted. During an interview on 05/01/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-04-13 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review facility staff failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The facility census was 50. Review of the Activity Director's (AD) employee file showed, the file did not contain an Activity Director certification, did not show completion of a state approved training course, or experience in a therapeutic activies program as required. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 3:55 P.M., the Activity Director (AD) said he/she does not have any certifications or formal training. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 5:10 P.M., the Administrator said the AD is not certified. He/She said he/she didn't know the AD had to be certified before taking the position.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-04-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staffed failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, on a daily basis. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility policies showed staff did not provide a policy for nurse staff posting. Observation on 4/10/23 at 10:45 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. Observation on 4/11/23 at 8:08 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. Observation on 4/12/23 at 9:45 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. Observation on 4/13/23 at 10:25 A.M., showed the nurse staff posting was not visible in the facility. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 4:35 P.M., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I said the nurse staffing is kept in a book at the nurses station, it is not posted anywhere. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 5:04 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A said the facility does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-04-13 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate one or more individuals with specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility's infection prevention and control program. The census was 50. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for specialized training as Infection Preventionist. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 2:45 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said he/she has not taken the classes or test to be certified as an IP. He/She said he/she is not enrolled in the Infection Preventionist (IP) CDC training. The ADON said they were aware you must be certified to hold the position, and he/she just took the job a few months ago. During an interview on 4/13/23 at 4:10 P.M., the Administrator said he/she was not aware the training and certification needed to be completed before given the position or title of IP.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-10-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN — 56 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 55 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 55; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINCOLN, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 08/01/1998 |
| LINCOLN, JUDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 08/01/1998 |
| GILBERT, VICTORIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/30/2022 |
| BYSOR, BRANDON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/30/2022 |
| DRAKE, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/1998 |
| STUTTS, CHARLOTTE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/01/1998 |
| N & R OF FULTON, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/1998 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $761K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265663. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.