Siler City Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 140.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews with the Responsible Parties (RPs), PACE (Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly) Nurse Practitioner, psychiatric Nurse Practitioner and staff, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired male resident's right to be free from sexual abuse (Resident #2) perpetrated by a cognitively impaired male resident (Resident #1). On 9/1/25 Nurse Aide (NA) #1 overheard Resident #2 laughing from the hallway and proceeded to the room he shared with Resident #1 as this was an unusual behavior for Resident #2. When NA #1 stepped into the doorway of the room, she observed Resident #2 lying on his back in bed with his penis exposed on the left side of his brief as Resident #1 stood beside the bed grasping Resident #2's penis with his hand as he moved his hand in an up and down motion. The residents did not have the cognitive capacity to consent to sexual relations or express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person would have been traumatized by being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, police reports, resident, staff, and psychotherapist interviews, the facility failed to protect moderately cognitively impaired residents (Resident #135 and Resident #49) right to be free from sexual abuse from a cognitively intact resident (Resident #122). During the shift from 7/11/23 at 11:00 P.M. to 7/12/23 at 7:00 A.M., Resident #122 entered Resident #135's room, while he was sleeping, lifted Resident #135's blanket and reached his hand into Resident #135's brief, and then stimulated Resident #135's penis. Resident #135 reported the sexual abuse to Nurse Aide (NA) #1 on 7/12/23 at approximately 4:00 A.M. Resident #135 explained Resident #122 had not been invited into his room and the physical touch was not consensual. Resident #135 reported the incident hurt me mentally and he made me sick. On the evening of 7/11/23 at approximately 11:00 P.M, Resident #49 was lying in bed watching television when Resident #122 entered Resident #49's room and manipulated Resident #49's penis through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Director (MD) interviews, the facility failed to hold an anticoagulant for a resident (Resident #345) who had oral surgery resulting in significant bleeding and emergency treatment, the facility also failed to wait for a nurse to asses a resident for injuries prior to moving her up off the floor (Resident #106). This was for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for standards of care. The findings included: 1. Resident #345 was admitted on [DATE]. The resident's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living. The resident's medical record contained a visit summary from the dentist dated 4/14/2023. The summary noted the resident needed referral to oral surgeon for extraction (removal) of all maxillary teeth and recommended complete denture for maxillary and partial denture for mandibular. The summary noted the resident was on Eliquis (anticoagulant). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store a scoop in a manner that prevented it from becoming contaminated by direct contact with flour, maintaining a clean steam table hood, and ensuring plastic plate bases were dried before being stacked for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included:1. The initial tour of the kitchen was on 2/23/26 at 10:17 AM with the Dietary Manager. A large bin of flour was observed by the prep table with the scoop stored in the container of flour.The Dietary Manager was interviewed on 2/23/26 at 10:17 AM. The Dietary Manager asked a kitchen aide to remove the scoop from the flour. The Dietary Manager explained the hook to hang the scoop was inside the container and when the lid to the container slid to the closed position, it often knocked the scoop back into the flour.2. At 10:19 AM on 2/23/26, a continuation of the tour revealed the underside of the steam table hood contained orange, brown residue and felt slick to touch. The Dietary Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident, staff, and Medical Director interviews the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to keep steroid nasal spray at bed side for self-administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medications (Resident #138).The findings included:Resident #138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Physician order dated 4/15/25 revealed an order for fluticasone propionate nasal suspension (steroid nasal spray for allergies) 50 micrograms 2 sprays in both nostrils twice a day for allergies.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #138 was cognitively intact.Resident #138's care plan dated 2/17/26 did not include any goals or interventions for self-administering medications.Review of Resident #138's medical record did not show an assessment for self-administration of medication.Resident #138 was interviewed on 2/23/26 at 11:16am. During the interview an observation was made of Resident #138's prescribed bottle of nasal spray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be from physical abuse when Resident #86 hit Resident #14 with a grabber (handheld device used to assist in obtaining items out of reach) on 12/2/25 which resulted in an abrasion to Resident #14's forehead and Resident #86 hit Resident #54 with an open hand across the face while Resident #86 was receiving one-on-one (1:1) supervision on 12/24/25. This for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #86). The findings included:Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia, insomnia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, mild cognitive impairment and anxiety.Review of Resident #86 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired with no upper or lower extremity impairments, only required set up for mobility and had no physical or verbal behaviors directed towards others. Review of Resident #86 Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of skin conditions for 1 of 11 residents who MDS assessments were reviewed (Resident #5).The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left patella fracture, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), congestive heart failure (CHF), hypothyroidism, and Alzheimer's disease. An admission progress note written on 10/08/25 at 2:46 PM by Nurse #8 stated Resident #5 had arrived at the facility via ambulance on a stretcher. She noted that Resident #5 had a dark spot to her coccyx, an open area to her spine, and redness to her left knee. A review of Resident #5's care plan dated 10/09/25 revealed she was found to be at risk for skin breakdown. The goal dated 10/9/25 stated Resident #5 would not show any signs of skin breakdown for 90 days. The interventions also dated 10/9/25 included to pat (do not rub) skin when drying, observe skin for signs and symptoms of skin breakdown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident, staff and Physician interviews, the facility failed to secure medications stored at the bedside for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication storage (Resident #7).The findings included:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #7's physician's orders dated 6/25/2025 revealed an order that stated, Resident may not administer his own meds. A review of Physician's order dated 6/25/25 for Resident #7 revealed that staff were to monitor swallowing during medication pass and to document if resident coughed, complained of pain, or demonstrated difficulty when swallowing meds.An observation and interview were conducted on 2/24/26 at 2:50PM with Resident #7 in his room. It was observed that he had a medication cup containing 7 pills sitting on his bedside table. Observation of the hallway outside of resident's room revealed the nurse for this hallway (Nurse #2) was no longer passing medications on the hallway. Resident #7 said he would take…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep the area around the trash compactor free from accumulated trash and debris for 1 of 1 trash compactor observed. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents.The findings included:An observation of the dumpster area occurred on 2/23/26 at 10:23 am with the Dietary Manager (DM). The observation revealed the facility had one trash compactor located in a fenced area behind the kitchen entrance. Directly in front of the trash compactor was a cement platform with a grassy area to the left side and back of the trash compactor. On the left side of the trash compactor in the grassy area there were four plastic bottles, six disposable cups, four disposable gloves, and seven straws.The DM was interviewed on 2/23/26 at 10:24 am. The DM explained the cement platform was cleaned weekly by a member of the kitchen staff but the trash and debris on the left side and back of the trash compactor did not get picked up. The DM stated she was not sure why the area was not attended to and commented that all departments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain the resident's dignity by not emptying urinals prior to lunch and as needed. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41's cognition was moderately impaired. He required moderate assistance with toileting and dressing and minimal assistance with transfers. He was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #41 had range of motion impairment to both sides of his upper extremities. An observation and interview were conducted with Resident #41 in his room on 11/04/24 at 10:39 AM. Resident #41 was observed laying on his bed watching TV. Two urinals were noted on the nightstand with urine in them. One with approximately 400 milliliters (ml) of yellow urine and one with approximately 250 ml of yellow urine. He stated the staff emptied them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to assess and obtain a physician's order for the self-administration of medications found at bedside for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #58). The findings included: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes type 2, and hypertension. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #58 was cognitively intact and displayed no behaviors or rejection of care. A review of Resident #58's medical record did not reveal an order to self-administer medications. On 11/4/24 at 10:30 AM, an observation was made of medications in a medication cup sitting on Resident #58's over the bed table. Resident #58 stated that the medication had been sitting there since his breakfast was delivered and that staff did not normally leave his medication sitting on the over the bed table. Resident #58's breakfast plate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to deliver resident mail unopened for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for mail delivery (Resident #29, Resident #91, and Resident #100). The findings included: a. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. An interview on 11/05/24 at 10:24 AM with Resident #29 revealed that he had received opened mail that was addressed to him. He stated that it had happened on more than one occasion but was unable to give specific dates. Resident #29 stated the mail that was opened was related to his financial status. b. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #91's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #91 was cognitively intact. An interview on 11/05/24 at 10:26 AM with Resident #91 revealed that she had received opened mail that was addressed to her. She stated that it had happened on more than one occasion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer water flushes via a feeding tube at the physician ordered flow rate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with tube feedings (Resident #22). The findings included: Resident #22 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and presence of a feeding tube. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #22 rarely made herself understood and had severely impaired decision-making skills. She was coded as receiving 51% or more of her total calories through a tube feeding and an average fluid intake of 501 cubic centimeters (cc) per day or more by tube feeding. A review of Resident #22's active physician orders included an order dated 10/17/24 to flush the feeding tube with 110 milliliters (ml) of water every 3 hours during continuous feedings. Resident #22's active care plan, last reviewed 10/25/24, revealed a focus area for an enteral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,909 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,909 — penalty dated 2025-09-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC