Arbor Glen Center
25 E Lindsley Road, Cedar Grove, NJ 07009 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 122 certified beds · (973) 256-7220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (12% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0610), cited Mar 2025
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,281 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-13)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.8% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.6% | 8.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.1% | 15.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.5% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.03 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.9%CMS range 43.1–58.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.3–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 6.8–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 12% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00184015 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 03/06/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse between a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Home Health Aide (HHA), and a resident (Resident #1). On 02/28/2025 at approximately 1:10 PM, Resident #1 verbalized that their skin was bruised due to rough handling by two staff members during transfer that morning. The accused CNA continued to care for residents with no additional supervision after 1:10 PM on 02/28/2025 and on 03/04/2025 before the facility's investigation was complete. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/06/2025 and Clinical Lead for New Jersey (CLNJ) on 03/07/2025 revealed that the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation into the abuse allegation. Interviews with the DON on 03/06/2025 and CLNJ on 03/07/2025 revealed that the facility did not follow its abuse policy. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour on 12/1/25 at 9:51 AM, the surveyor observed the dual conventional oven that had a stove and a grill on top. The Food Service Director (FSD) stated the stove and grill on top were being used to cook residents' food. The FSD stated the dual ovens in the bottom do not get used for cooking. The surveyor did not observe any signage that the dual ovens in the bottom were out of order or not to be used. The surveyor opened the dual ovens and observed inside four strips of glue board traps with dead roaches. The surveyor observed inside the first oven five dead roaches on one glue board, and seven dead roaches on another. The surveyor observed the second oven, which had two dead roaches on one glue board and seven dead roaches on the other glue board. On that same date and time, the FSD stated, We have a roach problem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its Grievance/Concern Policy by failing to a.) thoroughly investigate a grievance filed by unsampled resident, b.) followed through the concerns of 1 of 1 resident during resident council meeting, and c.) notify the residents of the comprehensive resolution with regard laundry concerns identified during resident council meeting for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #23, #31, #42, #61, and #65). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/2/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the provided last three months Resident Council Minutes that was provided by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and revealed that on 10/14/25, there were seven members (residents) and two non-council members (Recreation Assistant and Food Service Director) in attendance. During the 10/14/25 Resident Council Meeting (RCM), Resident #23 had voiced concerns regarding the laundry process and clothing return. Further review of the 10/14/25 RCM revealed that there was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 2 of 21 residents (Residents #20 and #39) call bells were within reach, able to use to accommodate residents' needs, and follow facility's call light policy.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 12/8/25 at 11:01 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) in the presence of the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager #1 (RN/UM #1) entered Resident #39's room and both observed the resident lying in a low bed with a cane by their side. S#1 observed the resident's call bell wrapped up in a loop and clipped to the wall where the system was attached to the wall. The call bell was not within reach of the resident. S #1 asked RN/UM #1 if the resident could reach the call bell, and she replied no they cannot. RN/UM #1 moved the call bell and placed it on the bed next to the resident and explained to the resident that it should stay where they can reach it if needed. 2.On 12/8/25 at 6:56 AM, Surveyor #2 (S #2) was accompanied by Registered Nurse/Unit Manager #2 (RN/UM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 406936Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #98) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 12/9/25 at 9:04 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #98.A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that Resident #98 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to; chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease (a condition where blood vessels outside of the heart and brain become narrowed or blocked), hypertension (high blood pressure), and difficulty walking. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 8/12/24, indicated a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. In Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise the comprehensive care plan of a resident. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 24 residents reviewed, Resident #9 and Resident #33.The deficient practice is evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 2682000Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received a physician's order for Librium in a timely manner or notify the physician that the ordered medicine was unavailable for additional orders for 1 of 24 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by: A review of Resident #63's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities, significantly interfering with daily life, work, and relationships), alcohol abuse (problematic pattern of alcohol use causing significant impairment or distress, diagnosed by 2 or more of 11 symptoms (like craving, tolerance, withdrawal, failing obligations, risky use, social problems) within 12 months, categorized as mild, moderate, or severe), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete post dialysis communication record assessments upon the resident's return from the dialysis center for 1 of one 1 resident, (Resident #6), reviewed for dialysis services, and consistent with professional standards of practice. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to post the accurate Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report daily for 3 of 5 days in a prominent place within the facility readily accessible and visible to the residents and the visitors.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/1/25 at 10:55 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) interviewed Registered Nurse/Unit Manager #1 (RN/UM #1) in unit 1 nursing station, who informed S #1 that the unit's census was 16, with two Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) for 7:00 AM-3:00 PM (7-3) shift. On 12/1/25 at 11:08 AM, S #1 interviewed RN/UM #2, who informed the surveyor that the unit's census was 26 in unit 4, with three CNAs for 7-3 shift. On 12/1/25 at 2:14 PM, during team meeting of surveyors, S #1 reported that per RN/UM #1 there were two CNAs in unit 1 and RN/UM #2 there were three CNAS in unit 4. S #2 stated that there were three CNAs in unit 2. S #3 stated that there were three CNAs in unit 3. The total CNAs on 12/1/25 were 11. On 12/1/25 at 2:35 PM, S #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to; a.) provide adequate monitoring for the use of psychoactive medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7), b.) review duplicate orders for the as needed (PRN) bowel regimen medications for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #7 and #35), and c.) review, clarify, and sequenced the PRN pain medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7), reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 12/1/25 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) observed Resident #7 lying on bed, awake, and informed S #1 that they were at the facility for short term rehabilitation. S #1 reviewed the medical records for Resident #7. A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but not limited to; unspecified sequelae of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) unspecified, restlessness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medication per manufacturer specifications and standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 2 medication carts observed on 1 of 1 medication storage areas observed in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.On [DATE] at 10:25 AM, the surveyor began to inspect selected medication (med) storage areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to retain health files for staff that were no longer employed with the facility for the timeframe required, for 2 of 20 new employee files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/1/25 at 10:14 AM, during entrance conference, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the medical files of the facility's 20 new hire employees since their last recertification survey. On 12/4/25 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor asked the LNHA for additional files for employees that were not given to the surveyor. The LNHA stated that the files were sent to storage if they were no longer employed with the facility and that she was calling to get the files. On 12/8/25 at 11:26 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Nurse Practice Educator (NPE) regarding process for health files. The NPE stated that when the staff member was no longer employed, she gave the file to human resources. On 12/8/25 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor notified the LNHA and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices for soiled linens and waste to decrease the possibility of spreading infection. The deficient practice was observed during tour on 1 of 4 units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/8/25 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor observed with a Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN/UM) the soiled utility room of Unit #1. The RN/UM stated the designated room was the only soiled utility room on the unit. The room had signage which indicated storage room and was secured with a keypad lock. Upon entering the room, the surveyor accompanied by the RN/UM observed on the front, right side of the room, one covered yellow colored bin with signage indicating only soiled diapers please; a large transport bin with a couple of clear plastic bags containing linen items; and three smaller covered garbage bins including one with signage labeled soiled gowns. The surveyor observed to the left side of the room, storage racks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for a.) 2 of 2 dining areas, b.) 1 of 4 unit hallways, and c.) and 2 of 21 sampled residents (Residents #20 and #33) rooms. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 12/2/25 at 11:23 AM, Surveyors #1 (S #1) and Surveyor #2 (S #2) in the presence of the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) observed the 2nd floor dining (also known as the activity room) area with 10 residents and one activity staff. The surveyors and the RN/UM observed the six heating system inside the grill with dried leaves, plastics, pieces of puzzles, papers, and grayish substances which the RN/UM confirmed that was accumulation of dust and should have been cleaned. At that same time, the surveyors and the RN/UM observed there were multiple boxes of different kinds of puzzles on top of one of the heating system. The RN/UM stated that those different boxes of puzzles that the activity department were being used for residents' should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 406965Based on interviews and record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified in a timely manner of a resident's change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer to the hospital (Resident #1). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 11/10/25 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #1's closed medical record. A review of Resident #1's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aka COPD, a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing difficulties) and obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where the airway repeatedly collapses or becomes blocked during sleep, leading to pauses in breathing).A review of Resident #1's electronic Progress Notes (PN) included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-09 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to have the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) present for one (1) of three (3) quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This failure had the potential to affect all 111 residents who currently live in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/01/24 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor met with the LNHA and the DON during an Entrance Conference meeting. Both the LNHA and the DON confirmed that day census (total number of residents) of 111 with no bed hold. On 8/01/24 at 12:09 PM, the LNHA provided the last three-quarters of QAPI sign-in sheets and revealed the following: QAPI Attendance: 01/17/24=the Medical Director (MD), DON, and other Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) signed the QAPI Attendance sheet. There was no documented evidence in the sign-in sheet that the LNHA and the Infection Preventionist (IP) attended the meeting. 4/15/24=the LNHA, MD, DON, IP, IDT, and vendor representative signed the QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview, review of the medical record, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative written notification of the facility's bed hold policy for one of (1) of two (2) residents, (Resident #82), reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: On 8/01/24 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #82 lying on their bed while watching the television with an indwelling catheter (a catheter which is inserted into the bladder, via the urethra and remains in situ to drain urine). There was an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign outside the door. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (a combination of paper, scanned, and computer-generated records) medical records of Resident #82. The admission Record (or face sheet, an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure), other retention of urine, anemia (low blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for three (3) of 24 residents, Residents #23, 109, and 167, reviewed for accuracy of MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) of Resident #109 which revealed the following: The admission Record (AR; a summary of important information about the resident) revealed that Resident #109 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, spinal stenosis (narrowing of the space around the spinal cord), osteoporosis (a condition which bones become weak and brittle), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The most recent Discharge-Return Not Anticipated (DRNA) MDS assessment, under section A, A2105, Discharge Status it was coded that the resident was discharged to 4. Short-Term General Hospital. A review of progress notes (PN) revealed the resident was discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) act upon the recommendations of the Urologist for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #82) reviewed for the care of urinary catheter and b.) ensure a resident's medication administration time was adjusted to accommodate their dialysis (a clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidneys) for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #12), reviewed for dialysis, according to facility's policies and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint#: NJ#174298 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility-provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure a.) that the resident with injury of unknown origin received treatment and implemented an intervention according to comprehensive assessment and person-centered care plan in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy and procedure for one (1) of three (3) residents, Resident #165, reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #NJ160835 Based on interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of clinical practice for a resident with pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of four (4) residents, Resident #168, reviewed for pressure ulcer care and prevention. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/05/24 at 12:19 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical records for Resident #168. The admission Record (a summary of important information about the resident) documented that the resident had diagnoses that included but were not limited to, dementia, and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/18/22, indicated the facility assessed the resident's cognition using a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) test. Resident #168 scored a 3 out of 15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of the November 2022 Treatment Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate an active care plan for smoking and complete the entire smoking assessment for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for smoking (Resident #24). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/01/24 at 01:45 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided list of smokers which reflected that Resident #24 was an independent smoker. On 8/05/24 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #24's electronic medical record and revealed: Resident #36's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to spina bifida (a birth defect in which a developing baby's spinal cord fails to develop properly), acquired absence of kidney (missing one kidney due to an injury or operation), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was comprehensively evaluated and care planned to receive appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #91) reviewed for mood and behavior. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/01/24 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #91 resting in bed. The resident was alert, and verbally responsive. Resident #91 stated they liked to stay in their room and watch television. The resident verbalized no concerns. A review of the facility provided matrix (a document used to identify important care categories for residents in the facility) revealed Resident #91 was indicated as having PTSD/Trauma. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record of Resident #91 which revealed the following: The admission Record (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor the target behavior for the use of a psychotropic medication specifically a antipsychotic medication (used to manage psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) by not having an order for behavior monitoring and indicating the target behavior on the resident's individualized care plan for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #36) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/06/24 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #36 seated upright in bed. On 8/06/24 at 01:06 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #36's hybrid (a combination of paper, scanned, and computer-generated records) medical record. A review of Resident #36's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to acute kidney failure (a condition in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices for one (1) of two (3) staff (Housekeeper) and b.) follow transmission-based precautions (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) protocol to prevent the potential spread of infection for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #82 and #108) reviewed for infection control, in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/24 revealed: Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient . Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient . After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity during mealtime for a resident who needed assistance with eating. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 25 residents reviewed, Resident #26 and was evidenced by the following: On 8/8/22 at 12:25 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 in bed, eating lunch when she called the Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) for assistance. The CNA entered the resident's room placing paper trash (removed from protected articles on the tray) ex. Straw paper covering) on top of the resident's meal tray. The surveyor further observed that the CNA was standing over the resident while feeding. The surveyor interviewed the CNA on 8/9/22 at 12:30 PM, and specified that staff should be seated next to the resident while assisting them during feeding time. Review of the admission record for Resident #26 documented diagnoses which included but were not limited to Schizophrenia, Chronic Kidney Disease and Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was readily accessible for a resident who was dependent on staff for care. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 25 residents reviewed for call bell/light (CBL), Resident #26 and #84, evidenced by the following: 1.) On 8/11/22 at 1:16 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #84's door closed. When the surveyor knocked on the door, the resident stated that she needed the nurse. The surveyor observed that the CBL was hanging toward the floor and out of reach for the resident. The surveyor asked the resident about the CBL. Resident #84 informed the surveyor that they didn't know that there was a CBL to use whenever they needed assistance. The surveyor handed the CBL to the resident. The surveyor observed Resident #84 press the CBL for assistance. A review of the admission record for Resident #84 reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-30 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #1). This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 8/17/22 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS Assessments. The MDS is a comprehensive tool that is a federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. Resident #1 was observed to have a Discharge MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/13/22 and was due to be transmitted no later than 6/10/22. The MDS was not transmitted until 8/4/22. According to the latest version of the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) - Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 Manual (updated October 2019) page 2-11 Discharge refers to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the appropriate management of an enteral feeding formula. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #25), and was evidenced by the following: On 8/9/22 at 1:38 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in bed, in a room where the resident was connected to oxygen via tracheostomy (an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe) tube along with a feeding pump that was turned off at the time. On 8/15/22 at 11:07 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in bed receiving tube feeding regulated by a pump. The surveyor noted that the feeding pump was set at 60 ml/hr with a total fed display of 1065 ml and 135 ml left to feed. The hanging bottle of Jevity 1.5 Cal had documented information written stating that it was hung on 8/14/22 and started at 4:00 PM at 60 ml/hr. The surveyor noticed that the hanging bottle of Jevity 1.5 Cal which originally contained 1000 ml, was almost completed. On 8/15/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) that a concentrator for a resident who was dependent on supplemental oxygen (O2) via a tracheostomy (an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe) had the proper settings, b.) that the O2 supply for a resident who was dependent on supplemental O2 via a tracheostomy was connected properly and c.) that a resident who was dependent on supplemental O2 via a tracheostomy had a valid physician's order for O2 in place. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a tracheostomy (Resident #25), and was evidenced by the following: On 8/9/22 at 1:38 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in bed in a room where the resident was connected to O2 via a tracheostomy tube along with a feeding pump that was turned off at the time. On 8/15/22 at 11:41 AM, the surveyor entered Resident #25's room and noted the O2 diluter attached to the oxygen and tracheostomy tube was set at 28 which corresponded to 5 liters per minute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) accurately follow facility policy related to the wasting of contaminated medication, b.) ensure that physician ordered hold parameters were accurately followed, c.) accurately document the administration of an as needed (prn) controlled substance. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 24 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #164, #95, #25 and #161), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 8:42 AM, the surveyor observed the Unit 1 Registered Nurse (RN) prepare medication for administration to Resident #164. During the medication preparation the RN dropped Losarten 100-12.5 mg (an antihypertensive medication) on the contaminated medication cart. The surveyor observed the RN pick up the Losarten 100-12.5 mg tablet and throw it into the garbage receptacle attached to the medication cart. The surveyor interviewed the RN after she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices identified during 3 of 22 residents observed for infection control breaches, Resident # 95, #25 and #61. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/11/22 at 9:05 AM, the surveyor observed the Unit 3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN3) prepare for the administration of medication to Resident #95. Prior to the administration of medication, LPN3 removed a device from her pocket, a Pulse Oximeter (Pulsox) (a noninvasive device placed on the fingertip which uses a light beam to estimate the oxygen saturation and pulse rate). The surveyor did not observe LPN3 sanitize the Pulsox prior to placing the device on the resident's finger. When LPN3 completed the Pulsox check, she placed the Pulsox back into her pocket. The surveyor interviewed LPN3 in reference to the sanitation of a multi resident use device. LPN3 stated, I cleaned the Pulsox in the morning and put it in my pocket. LPN3 then removed the Pulsox from her pocket and cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS NJ HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2011 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| AGRESTI, JAMES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/10/2020 |
| FISHMAN, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/31/2011 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| ASEFAHA, TSEGA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315036. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.