Jersey Shore Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 263 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 125.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that all interdisciplinary team members (IDT) participated in quarterly care conferences for four of 28 sample residents (Resident (R) 36, R83, R101, and R225). This failure had the potential for the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Profile, located under the Profile tab in the EMR, revealed R36 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive and reflex uropathy, calculus of kidney, urinary tract infection, sepsis, type two diabetes, and chronic kidney disease stage 3B. Review of R36's Care Plan meeting notes located under the Progress Notes tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) dated 02/27/25 indicated that only the Social Services, Rehab and R36 attended the care conference. 2. Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab in the EMR revealed R83 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, acute pyelonephritis, pseudomonas as the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 57) observed out of a total sample of 28 residents had an assessment and an order for self-administration of medications. These failures placed R57 at risk for medication errors, medication adverse effects, or misappropriation of medications. Findings include: Review of R57's Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of R57's Orders tab of the EMR revealed there were no orders for the nasal sprays nor was there an order for self-administration of medications. Review of R57's Assessment tab and Documents tab of the EMR revealed no assessment for R57 to have medications at his bedside for self-administration. An observation on 03/12/25 at 8:33 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policies, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for one of 28 sample residents (Resident (R) 89). Failure to identify risk factors and intervene to prevent an incident involving inappropriate sexual contact directly increased the risk R89 and other residents could experience abuse. Findings include: R89's ''admission Record'' located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab documented R89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. The quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/01/24 was located under the MDS tab in EMR. The MDS documented R89 had severely impaired cognition and scored three out of 15 on the ''Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The MDS noted R89 needed maximum assistance with transfers and was able to navigate a wheelchair in the environment. On 03/11/25 at 10:05 AM, R89 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an abuse investigation of inappropriate touching was documented for one of 28 sample residents (Resident (R) 89). Failure to ensure a thorough investigation of the incident increased the risk that other residents may have experienced a similar incident, or the incident had a negative impact on their sense of well-being. Findings include: R89's ''admission Record,'' located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, documented R89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. The most recent annual ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/23/25 was located under the MDS tab in EMR. The MDS documented R89 had severely impaired cognition and scored two out of 15 on the ''Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 03/11/25 at 10:05 AM, R89 was observed seated in the dining room at a table. When greeted R89 was responded engaged in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (Resident (R) 91) who used supplemental oxygen out of 28 sample residents had equipment kept in a clean and sanitary condition. Failure to ensure the oxygen lines were changed weekly and ensure the filter was clean increased the risk the resident could develop a respiratory infection. Findings include: Review of R91's ''Face Sheet'' under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) identified an admission date of 09/07/24. The admission ''Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/13/24, located under the MDS tab in EMR, documented R91 had multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that restricts airflow and breathing) and needed supplemental oxygen. The MDS assessment documented R91 was dependent on aid from staff to complete the activities of daily living (ADLs) (I.e., dressing, grooming hygiene, and toileting), except eating. The Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored for psychotropic medications for two of six residents (Resident (R) 91 and R102) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 28 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to unwarranted medication side effects or improperly treated symptoms. Findings include: 1. Review of R91's undated Face Sheet, located in the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R91's diagnoses included depression unspecified, anxiety disorder unspecified, and adjustment insomnia. Review of R91's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/25 revealed R91 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating R91 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated R91 had depression and anxiety diagnoses and had received antipsychotic medication, antidepressant medication, antianxiety medication,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and hand hygiene were consistently implemented for two of 28 sample residents (Resident (R) 43 and R87). Failure to ensure the facility staff completed hand hygiene after handling clothing and linens, and implement EBP as directed placed these and other residents at risk for infections. Findings include: 1. R43's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medical diagnoses including a progressive neurological disease, a seizure disorder, and was nonverbal. The last annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/30/24, showed R43 had a colostomy to manage bowel movements, a gastronomy tube (G-tube) that provided nutritional support, was nonresponsive, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #'s NJ00172207, NJ00173028 and NJ00180815 Based on observation, interview, staffing assignment review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate staffing to ensure the provision of resident care for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident (R) 9 and R2). This failure had the potential to affect resident care for all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R9's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated R9 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses that included mononeuropathy of left lower limb, spondylosis lumbar region, spinal cord compression, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/20/24 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, which indicated R9 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 02/24/25 at 9:55 AM R9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document resident grievances regarding care and staffing and failed to provide a resolution to the concerns for two of 22 residents (Resident (R) 2 and R9) reviewed for grievances. This had the potential to cause concerns and grievances to be unresolved. Findings include: During an interview on 02/24/25 at 9:55 AM Resident (R) 9 stated the facility was severely understaffed because call lights are going off all night long making it hard to sleep with the constant beeping. R9 stated he/she would like three showers per week and that he/she would like his/her urine collection bag emptied at least once a night. R9 stated there have been nights when it had burst. R9 stated he/she had shared his/her concerns regarding cares and staffing with the Social Services Assistant (SSA) on 02/19/25 at 11:15 AM and was told he/she would receive a written response. During an interview on 02/24/25 at 3:25 PM, R2 stated he/she had a virus two plus weeks ago and he/she threw up all over himself/herself and it took 50…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #'s NJ00172207, NJ00173028 and NJ00180815 Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for one of three residents (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) out of a total sample of 20. R9, who was dependent on staff for ADLs, was not assisted with showers twice weekly as scheduled and consistent with the resident's choices. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial wellbeing and quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), with a revision date of 05/01/23, revealed, . based on the comprehensive assessment of a patient and consistent with the patients' needs and choices, the Center must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a patient's activities of daily living (ADL) abilities are maintained . including Hygiene - bathing and grooming . Review of R9's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ