Maple Glen Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 127.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-09-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a facility wide assessment was reviewed and updated to identify the required services and procedures necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all residents to ensure adequate facility resources to provide resident care and services. These failures had the potential to affect all 122 residents who currently live in the facility during the time of the survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:During the entrance conference on 8/26/25 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) documents to complete the survey process which included but were not limited to Facility Assessment (FA). Both the LNHA and DON stated that the facility's census (the number of residents currently under the care of a specific facility) was 122.On 8/26/25 at 12:19 PM, the LNHA provided the surveyor a 35 page FA which included the following:Resident Population…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews on 8/27/25 and 8/28/25 in the presence of the Senior Maintenance Director (SMD) and Maintenance Director (MD), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident call bell system was properly functioning in all areas. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all (122) residents and was evidenced by the following:Observations on 8/27/25 from 12:44 PM to 12:50 PM, revealed:The call bell system failed to activate for room [ROOM NUMBER] when tested by the MD. The light outside of the room did not turn on, and no audible or visual notification was given at the nurse's station.The call bell system failed to activate for room [ROOM NUMBER] when tested by the MD. The light outside of the room did not turn on, and no audible or visual notification was given at the nurse's station.In an interview at the time, the MD confirmed the observation.The MD then inspected the annunciator panel at the nurse's station. Although the screen was powered on, the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents' environment in a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike surrounding. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 nursing units (Units 2 and 3) observed during environment tour. This deficient practice was evidenced by: 1.On 8/27/25 at 11:35 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN#1) went inside Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (RR#208) and observed the following: The dresser top area with used coffee cup and plastic wrappers. The 1st drawer of the dresser near the window with peeled wood and there was a coffee cup that was mixed with resident's unfolded clothes. LPN#1 stated that the peeled wood needed a glue. The 2nd drawer of the dresser with small food plastic container (with dried food) that was mixed with unfolded clothes. LPN#1 stated that was probably food that was brought by Resident's Responsible (RR) party and should have been thrown out to garbage. There was a fly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REPEAT DEFICIENCYBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to submit the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for 2 of 27 residents reviewed (Resident # 74 and Resident #109).The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/29/25 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed the most recent MDS's, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for the timeliness of submission for three system-selected residents.Information in the electronic medical record and additional information provided by the facility revealed the following for two of the residents:1. Resident #74 had a discharge (d/c) MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/28/25. The MDS was completed but had not been submitted.2. Resident #109 had a d/c assessment with an ARD of 4/9/25. The assessment had been inactivated after completion and was not submitted.On 8/29/25 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) regarding the residents' d/c MDS. The MDSC stated that she had started at the end of May. The MDSC stated that a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standards of clinical practice by failing to a.) update a physician order for wanderguard with the correct expiration date for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #12), reviewed for elopement and b.) ensure a medication was administered to a resident and not left at the bedside for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #13).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey stated, The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) administer tube feeding per the physician's order (PO) and b) document the total volume according to PO and standards of clinical practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #2 and #9), reviewed for receiving nutrition via tube feeding, and was evidenced by the following:1.On 8/26/25 at 10:32 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #2's room was closed with an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) posted sign outside the door. Inside the resident's room, the resident's privacy curtain was pulled halfway, the resident's eyes were closed, tube feeding (TF, nutrition received through a flexible tube surgically inserted into the stomach) pump was on at 40 ml/hr (milliliter/hour), and Jevity 1.5 container was hung on the pole. S#1 reviewed the medical records of Resident #2, and revealed: A review of the admission Record (AR; an admission summary) or face sheet reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and a review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify irregularity for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #2), identified during Medication Regimen Review (MRR). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of the U.S. FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) medication (med) guide for prevacid delayed release capsules., revised September 2012, reflected the instructions for use.should be taken before eating. Prevacid delayed release capsules through a nasogastric tube or larger, as prescribed by the doctor:.you can only use apple juice. 1. Open the capsule (cap) and empty the granules into a syringe. 2. Do not break or crush the granules. 3. Mix with 40 ml (milliliters) of apple juice. Do not use other liquids. 4. Attach the syringe to the tube and give the med in the syringe through the tube into the stomach. 5. After giving the granules, flush the tube with more apple juice to clear the tube. Prevacid should not be used in foods or liquids not listed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00181779 Based on interviews, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the confidentiality and privacy of a resident (Resident #6)) during an investigation of an alleged sexual incident between the Resident and a staff member that is in accordance with the facility's written abuse prohibition policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents and was evidenced as follows: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include but not limited to: Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Radiculopathy, Lumbar Region, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Chronic Pancreatitis, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Personality Disorder, and Functional Intestinal Disorder. According to the Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities, dated 03/06/2025, under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-03-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00175767 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 03/11/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan with a focus [problem area] to address a special procedure, Pleurex Drainage (the process of removing excess fluids from spaces around the lungs) specific for a newly admitted resident (Resident #1) who had diagnosis of pleural effusion (a condition where excess fluids accumulates in spaces around the lungs). Resident #1 was not in the facility during the survey. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents and was evidenced as follows: According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that included but not limited to: Pleural Effusion, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. According to Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], an assessment tool used by facility to facilitate a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00175767 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined on 03/11/2025 that the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse had the specific competency and skills set necessary to care for a resident's needs involving a Pleurex drainage (the process of removing excess fluids from spaces around the lungs) specific for Resident #1who had a diagnosis of pleural effusion (a condition where excess fluids accumulate in spaces surrounding the lungs). Resident #1 was not in the facility during the survey. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents and was evidenced as follows: According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that included but not limited to: Pleural Effusion, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. According to Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], an assessment tool used by facility to facilitate a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ