No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Southern Ocean Center

1361 Route 72 West, Manahawkin, NJ 08050 · For profit - Corporation · 136 certified beds · (609) 978-0600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 978-0600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
400 E Bay Ave · (609) 978-7200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
517 NJ-72, Ste B · (609) 677-7776 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ShopRite0.2 mi
72 Stafford Ave # RT · (609) 597-0091 · Call to confirm hours
Park
86 N Main St · (609) 597-1000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
US-9 235'n of Hilliard Dr, 117 N Main St · (609) 597-7586

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.6%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.1%8.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.2%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%15.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.6%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.9%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.342.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 408 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 186 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.0%CMS range 55.2–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 8.7–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 5.3–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
35.0%
Total nursing turnover
41.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 119.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-08)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record reviews and reviews of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/2/26 and 3/3/26, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that medical records for residents were accurate as evidenced by a.) an inaccurate weight being entered for a Resident #5 b.) the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who did not sign out the Medical Administration Record (MAR) after administering (Resident #8) and c.) nurses clicking the wrong button under Nutrition while documenting their skilled evaluations for a Resident #4. This resulted in inaccurate medical records and failure to identify potential medication, weight, and documentation errors. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 10 residents reviewed for resident records (Resident #4, Resident #5 and Resident #8), and was evidenced by the following:A. On 3/2/26 the surveyor reviewed Resident #5's documented weights while at the facility. Resident #5 had a weight of 166.5 pounds on 11/28/25 and 150 pounds on 11/29/25.According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 3/2/26 and 3/3/26, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff properly wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care for patients on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for four residents (Resident #1, Resident #7, Resident #9 and Resident #10). The facility also failed to follow its policy titled IC 308 Enhanced Barrier Precautions. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 10 residents reviewed for infection prevention and was evidenced by the following:According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint (a break in the hip socket next to a hip implant), presence of left artificial hip joint, and heart failure.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/14/26, Resident #1's Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE], from 08:47 AM to 09:39 AM, during the kitchen tour, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD), observed three gallons of unopened whole milk in the walk-in refrigerator. The manufacturer's expiration date on the milk was [DATE]. On [DATE] at 8:47 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Dietary Director (DD) stated that the expired milk would be discarded, and that expired milk could cause illness. A review of the undated facility policy titled, Use By Dating Guidelines, revealed that .The manufactures' expiration date, when available, is the use by for unopened items. N.J.A.C 8:39-17.2 (g)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during a COVID-19 outbreak, specifically the a.) use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for 2 unsampled residents (Resident #46 and Resident #105) and 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for tube feeding on transmission-based precautions, b.) handling of clean linen during transport in the nursing unit on COVID-19 outbreak, and c.) hand hygiene for residents in the dining room, to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: As SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the community increases, the potential for encountering asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection also likely increases. In these circumstances, healthcare facilities should consider implementing broader use of respirators and eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures by ensuring a resident (Resident #104) was free from verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #104) and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident # 104 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, depression and diabetes mellites (DM). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate a resident's care dated 5/29/25, indicated that Resident #104 scored a 11/15 on the Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also reflected that the resident did not exhibit any behaviors.A review of the form AAS-45 (Facility Reportable Event) dated 8/5/25, indicated that on 8/2/25 a housekeeper told Resident #104 to learn to use the toilet when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set death in facility tracking record in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #17). This deficient practice was evidenced by:On [DATE], at 9:47 AM the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS Assessments. The surveyor reviewed Resident #17's electronic medical record. The record revealed that the resident expired on [DATE]. The electronic health record reflected that there was no death in facility tracking record completed for the resident's death date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:30 PM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the death in facility tracking record was not completed or transmitted for Resident #17. She stated it should have been completed and transmitted by [DATE]. A MDS is a comprehensive tool that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaints: NJ00176578, NJ00181499, NJ00184013, NJ00184932 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 06/04/2025 and 06/06/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that; a.) medications were administered according to Physician orders (POs), b.) bloodwork was obtained and faxed according to POs, and c.) Physicians were notified that medications were not administered or available. This deficient practice was identified for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #5). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) promptly record the removal of a controlled drug from inventory b) maintain accurate accountability of controlled substances within the medication administration carts c) maintain accurate accountability of all controlled medications within the automated medication dispensing system d) accurately document and complete DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency)-222 forms. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 4 medication carts on 2 of 3 nursing units and for 12 of 12 DEA-22 forms reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 12:14 PM, the surveyor inspected the Low Hall Garden Unit medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) #1. When the surveyor requested to inspect the controlled medications RN #1 stated, The count was going to be off (not accurate count) with the Oxycodone (a controlled medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) 5 milligram (mg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and or resident representative in writing of the reason for transfer or discharge to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #108) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 04/24/24 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #108 lying in bed awake. The resident was unable to be interviewed at that time due to a language barrier. Review of Resident #108's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: age-related debility, muscle wasting and atrophy (waste away, unspecified site), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to blocked urinary flow). Review of Resident #108's Progress Notes (PN) revealed a PN dated 03/26/24 at 01:05 AM, Follow-up care for abnormal labs. Vitals taken BP-(blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment within 14 days after a resident elected hospice services using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for hospice and end of life care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/24/24 at 9:48 AM during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #24 lying in bed asleep. The resident was accompanied by the hospice aide who provided personal care to the resident at the time of the observation. Review of Resident #24's admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease. Review of the resident's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 11/01/23, Hospice Eval (evaluation) and Tx (treat). Review of Resident #24's Care Plan revealed an entry dated 11/3/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, record review, and pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care, based upon current standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive care plan specifically not securing a urinary catheter drainage bag properly resulting in the bag making contact with the floor. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 (Resident # 15) investigated for Urinary Catheter. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 04/08/2024 revealed that he/she had an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to assist in the flow of urine). A review of Resident # 15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed under Med Diag that he/she was diagnosed with but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (needing to urinate frequently (during the day and night), a weak urine stream, and leaking or dribbling of urine) and Retention of Urine. A review of Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ Complaint #159967, #159711, #169655, #170197, Based on interview, review of the Nurse Staffing Report and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to the residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/29/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor held a Resident Council meeting with six residents in attendance. During the Resident Council meeting the surveyor asked all residents in attendance if they received showers, or assistance with showers. Four of the six residents in attendance told the surveyor that showers were not offered twice weekly (Resident #21, #84. #94, and #122). All were aware of their shower day schedule but stated they do not always receive them because of staffing issues. 1.For the week of Complaint staffing from 10/02/2022 to 10/08/2022, the facility was deficient in CNA staffing for residents on 7 of 7 day shifts as follows: -10/02/22 had 6.5 CNAs for 111 residents on the day shift, required at least 14 CNAs. -10/03/22 had 8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices, specifically failing to adhere to the minimum time to lather hands during hand hygiene when providing wound care. The deficient practice was observed during wound care for 1 of 2 residents (Residents # 59) investigated for Pressure Ulcer/Injury. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 59's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 01/22/2024 revealed that he/she had wounds. A review of Resident # 59's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed under Orders to Cleanse Right heel with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply hydrogel fluffed gauze. Cover with ABD, wrap with kling [gauze-style bandage] every day shift for open wound for 14 Days AND as needed. The order was initiated on 04/25/2024. A review of Resident # 59's EMR revealed under Care Plan a focus that Resident # 59 has a documented pressure ulcer to the right heel. The focus was initiated on 04/24/2024. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the pneumococcal vaccination for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings included: Reference: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] User's Manual for Version 3.0, revised in October 2023, indicated Coding Instructions O0300A, Is the Resident's Pneumococcal Vaccination Up to Date? Code 0, no: if the resident's pneumococcal vaccination status is not up to date or cannot be determined. Proceed to item O0300B, If Pneumococcal vaccine not received, state reason. The Manual further indicated Code 2, Offered and declined: resident or responsible party/legal guardian has been informed of what is being offered and chooses not to accept the pneumococcal vaccine. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #4 on 08/14/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes. A review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of eligibility and consent to receive or refusal of the pneumococcal vaccination upon admittance into the facility for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccination, with a revised date of 11/15/2022, indicated, Upon admission, obtain the pneumococcal vaccination history of all patients. It further revealed 1.2 Document pneumococcal vaccination history in PointClickCare (PCC) and on the Pneumococcal Consent form under Vaccination History. 2. Based on the patient's pneumococcal vaccination history, offer (unless the vaccination is medically contraindicated, or the patient has already been vaccinated) the appropriate vaccination following the recommended schedule. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 08/14/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes. A review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-06 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently offer residents HS (hour of sleep) snacks. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #17, #23, #68, #44, and #25) during resident council meeting and was evidenced by the following: On 03/22/22 at 11:06 AM, the Surveyor conducted resident council meeting with five residents. During that time, the Surveyor inquired about HS snacks. All five residents commented that they do not always get offered bedtime snacks and that it would depend on the staff that evening. On 03/23/22 at 8:09 AM, the second floor Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN UM) stated that the process would be for the evening snacks to be delivered from the kitchen about 6:45 PM to 7 PM. The LPN UM stated some snacks are assigned to certain residents and the other snacks would be offered to the rest of the residents. The LPN UM stated that the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) would either document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner to limit the spread of infection and potential food borne illness by failing to ensure: a.) the environment and kitchen equipment was maintained in a manner to limit the potential for microbial growth and to prevent physical contaminants from entering the food, b.) staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene and restrained hair appropriately, c.) food items were maintained in a manner to ensure they were not used past their use by date, and d.) a process was in place to ensure bottled water was maintained in a manner to ensure the water was not used by a use by date. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at from 9:32 AM to 11:30 AM, the Surveyor conducted an initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), and observed the following: 1. The refrigerated walk-in unit had a dark spot affixed to the interior of the wall by the door, and what appeared as greenish dark stained areas throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) follow the facility policy for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), and b.) ensure that a resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility that were significant to the resident. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and honor a resident's bathing request. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 residents reviewed (Resident #50) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at 9:50 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #50 in bed with their eyes closed. On 03/17/22 at 12:19 PM, the Surveyor returned to Resident #50s room during the lunch meal, and observed a Friend of Resident #50 that was visiting at the bedside. The Friend informed the surveyor he had been trying to get Resident #50 a shower for the past two months. The Friend stated that the facility had not been able to accommodate Resident #50's preference for a shower. A Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the following: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) follow the facility policy for Advance Directives to ensure a complete and updated Advance Directive was maintained in a resident's medical file, and b.) inform and offer educational material regarding Advance Directives. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) who was reviewed for Advance Directives. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at 9:43 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #2 in their room with their spouse. Resident #2 spoke to the Surveyor and was confused at times. A review of Resident #2's medical records revealed the following: The admission Record revealed Resident #2 had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses, which included but were not limited, to dementia without behavioral disturbance, Transient Ischemic Attack (stroke-like attack wherein symptoms resolve within 24 hours), depression, lack of coordination, hyperkalemia (elevated blood potassium),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) administer oxygen per the physician order for 2 of 5 residents sampled for respiratory/oxygen (Resident #36 and Resident #17), b.) ensure that all oxygen supplies were changed, labeled and dated weekly for 4 of 5 residents sampled for respiratory/oxygen, and c.) post cautionary signage to indicate that oxygen therapy was in use for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen/respiratory (Resident #36, #17, # 63 and Resident #27). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 03/17/22 at 10:13 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #36 resting in bed with eyes open wearing oxygen (O2) by way of nasal cannula (tubing used to deliver oxygen). The O2 was connected to an oxygen concentrator (an electronic device that removed nitrogen from room air and increased the oxygen concentration) that was sitting beside the bed and set to deliver 3.5 liters of oxygen per minute. On 03/18/22 at 9:24 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #36 resting in bed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) consistently communicate information to the dialysis center by failing to document an assessment and pre-dialysis treatment, on the Hemodialysis Communication Record (HCR), per facility policy, for 22 of 35 scheduled dialysis treatments, b.) document an assessment, post dialysis treatment, on the HCR, per facility policy, for 33 of 35 scheduled dialysis treatments, c.) accurately monitor and account for the intake of all fluids administered for a resident with a physician ordered fluid restriction, d.) ensure a physician ordered medication that required additional fluid for administration would not exceed the fluid restriction, and was documented. This deficient practice was evidenced for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed for dialysis (Resident #4) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at 11:25 AM, during initial tour, the Surveyor observed Resident #4 lying in bed. Resident #4 stated that he/she received hemodialysis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure: a.) a resident was offered a shower on scheduled shower days, and b.) that residents were consistently offered evening snacks. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F561 and F809 The facility failed to: a.) follow the facility policy for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and b.) ensure that a resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility that were significant to the resident. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and honor a resident's bathing request. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 residents reviewed (Resident #50). On 03/17/22 at 12:19 PM, the Surveyor returned to Resident #50s room during the lunch meal, and observed a Friend of Resident #50 that was visiting at the bedside. The Friend informed the surveyor he had been trying to get Resident #50 a shower for the past two months. The Friend stated that the facility had not been able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-06 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a process to track and perform weekly: a.) COVID-19 testing for staff that did not receive a COVID-19 vaccination, and b.) COVID-19 testing for staff who were not up-to-date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccinations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: CMS QSO-20-38-NH dated revised 09/10/21, Routine testing of unvaccinated staff should be based on the extent of the virus in the community. Fully vaccinated staff do not have to be routinely tested. Facilities should use their community transmission level as the trigger for testing frequency. Reports of COVID-19 level of community transmission are available on the CDC COVID-19 Integrated County View site:https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#county-view. Table 2: Routine testing Intervals by County COVID-19 Level of Community Transmission . Level of COVID-19 Community Transmission:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident dignity by failing to ensure a urinary collection privacy cover was in place over the urinary catheter collection bags. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #54 & Resident #69) for urinary catheter use. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: a.) On 03/17/22 at 9:40 AM, during a tour of the facility, the Surveyor observed Resident #54 seated in the Dining Room (DR) with three other residents. The catheter drainage bag was underneath the chair and had a visible amount of urine inside the bag and did not have a privacy cover. On 03/17/22 at 10:36 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #54 attending an activity in the DR with other residents present. The catheter drainage bag was observed half full with urine and was without a privacy cover. On 03/17/22 at 12:18 PM, the Surveyor, in the presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of clinical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency, Department of Health (DOH). This was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #51) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/18/22 at 8:55 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Resident #51 who stated that he/she remembered reporting a complaint about a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to the human resources manager (HRM). The resident that stated that he/she reported that the CNA did not provide care to him anymore or since he/she reported it to the administration. The resident stated that the CNA was rude and was talking about him/her in the hallway loudly enough so that he/she could hear him/her. On 03/18/22 at 9:13 AM, the Surveyor interviewed HRM who identified herself as the Workforce Specialist which was the human resources director. The HRM told the surveyor that she remembered about one year ago that Resident #51 reported that he/she did not care for of his/her CNAs. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility Abuse Prohibition policy by failing to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #51) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at 9:49 AM, during the tour the surveyor observed Resident #51 in his/her room in bed who stated that there were nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) in the facility that were mean. Resident #51 stated that last Saturday he/she requested the CNA to change him/her because he/she had a bowel movement (BM). Resident #51 stated that the CNA assigned to his/her care did not change him/her for four hours and he/she was left sitting in BM. Resident #51 stated that he/she did not report this concern, and gave the Surveyor permission to report the concern to the Social Worker (SW). On 03/18/22 at 8:55 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Resident #51 who stated that he/she remembered reporting a complaint about a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise resident Care Plans (CP) to include interventions for: a.) 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #11), and b.) 1 of 4 resident reviewed for accidents (Resident #17). This deficient practice and was evidenced by the following: a.) On 03/17/22 at 10:05AM, during the initial tour the Surveyor interviewed Resident #11 in his/her room who stated that he/she did not remember when he/she developed the wound to the right heel. The Surveyor reviewed the clinical record which revealed the following information: The admission Record revealed that Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, venous insufficiency and cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/23/21, revealed Section M (skin Conditions) indicated that there were no pressure ulcers, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of practice by failing to accurately document a locked emergency cart. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 3 units (1st floor subacute unit and 2nd floor long term care unit) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist: Reference New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the state of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an incident of unsafe smoking. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #17) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at 10:13 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #36 resting in bed with his/her eyes open. The Surveyor observed the resident had oxygen (O2) infusing by way of a nasal cannula (tubing used to deliver oxygen, flexible tube that is placed under the nose) that was connected to an oxygen concentrator (an electronic device that removes nitrogen from room air and increases the oxygen concentration). On 03/17/22 at 12:41 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #17 self-propelling in a wheelchair in the hallway. On 03/17/22 at 12:50 PM, the Surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record which revealed the following: The admission Face Sheet (an admission summary) revealed that Resident #17 had diagnoses which included but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods at the appropriate hot and cold temperatures on 1 of 2 units, and for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for food (Resident #57). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/17/22 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor #1 conducted an interview with Resident #57. The resident stated that the food sat on the trays, there was no temperature control for the food, and the food was cold at times. The Surveyor reviewed the 02/24/22 Resident Council Minutes. Complaints for Food Committee revealed: Food is extremely cold- Not using plate warmers. On 03/22/22 at 12:04 PM, the Surveyor observed the tray-line in progress. At that time, the Surveyor reviewed the lunch meal food temperature log as identified by the Cook. The Surveyor observed that the temperature log was blank in the milk, dessert (peaches) and vegetable (broccoli) was not listed. On 03/22/22 at 12:07 PM, the Surveyor requested a test tray that included the main and alternate entree, milk and dessert. The tray exited the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident a pneumococcal vaccine. This deficient practice was evidenced for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident # 50). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/25/22, the Surveyor reviewed Resident #50's medical record. A review of Resident #50's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and presence of cardiac pacemaker (small device that's placed in the chest to help control the heartbeat). A review of Resident #50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 04/4/22, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) develop and implement a policy to track and securely document the COVID-19 vaccination status for all staff, and b.) ensure all staff were vaccinated for COVID-19. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO-22-07 ALL, dated 12/28/21, included the following: Within 30 days after issuance of this memorandum 2, if a facility demonstrates that: Policies and procedures are developed and implemented for ensuring all facility staff, regardless of clinical responsibility or patient or resident contact are vaccinated for COVID-19; and 100% of staff have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, or have a pending request for, or have been granted qualifying exemption, or identified as having a temporary delay as recommended by the CDC, the facility is compliant under the rule; or Less than 100% of all staff have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, or have a pending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS NJ HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/08/2025
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
FISHMAN, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/31/2011
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
LARKIN, HARRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022
MYERS, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 18%Other / private 29%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$393per resident / day
operating cost
$11,947per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$393per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315332. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next