Holly Manor Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 91.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-01-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain nutrition status and prevent weight loss for one of three residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident (R) 56). Due in part to the failure to communicate R56's ongoing, significant weight loss to the interdisciplinary team, implement nutritional interventions that were recommended and closely monitor the resident's weight, R56 experienced a significant unintentional weight loss which resulted in his inability to maintain a healthy weight. Findings include: Review of R56's admission Record, located in R56's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pneumonia, respiratory failure, hematuria, and dementia. Review of R56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/10/22 revealed that R56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, which indicated the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat Deficiency Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 2/4/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the dry storage area, the surveyor observed a 16 ounce (oz) opened bottle of maple syrup labeled with a use by date of 1/1/24 and an opened 1 gallon opened container of cooking oil labeled with a use by date 1/5/24. The FSD stated both of those items should have been discarded per the use by date. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator, the surveyor observed a 1-gallon opened fat free Italian dressing without a label displaying the open and use by dates. The surveyor also observed a blackish dust like substance on the fan grate of the refrigerator. observed with a black colored substance. The FSD stated the Italian dressing should have been discarded and the fan grate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the dumpster and surrounding area free of garbage and debris. On 2/4/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor toured in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and the designated garbage area and observed the following: There was garbage debris that included food wrapper, cups, gloves, paper products, and medication cups, surrounding the dumpster and surrounding areas. The FSD stated that the area should have been clean by the maintenance and dietary departments. On 2/10/25 at 12:05 PM, the surveyor met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Clinical Lead (RCL) who were informed of the surveyor's findings. The LNHA stated the garbage area should be kept free of debris. On 2/10/25 at 12:50 PM, the DON provided the surveyor with a copy of the facility policy titled, trash Removal, with a revised date of 3/1/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to (a). provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate documentation of the receipt of a controlled substance for 6 of 6 Schedule II controlled substance medications ordered and received by the facility for use as an emergency backup supply, on three Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) 222 Forms (a form used to order controlled substances from a provider) reviewed and (b) to follow a physician orders (PO) for the administration of blood pressure medications for 1 or 1 resident's (Resident#60) reviewed for blood pressure management. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: 21 CFR 1305.13 Procedure for filling DEA Forms 222. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities in the resident's medical record, to the facility staff, and attending physician. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of twenty (24) residents reviewed, (Resident #60) for medication management and was evidenced by the following: On 2/5/25 at 10:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #60 in their room, the resident was observed seated in a chair and was watching television. The resident was alert and oriented and was wearing a knee brace on their left knee. The surveyor reviewed Resident #60's medical record. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently monitor, document, and evaluate the ongoing benefits of continued use of psychoactive medications according to the facility's policy for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident#4,#45, #68, and #93). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/4/25 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #93 lying in bed awake, screaming and yelling in their native language. A family member sat beside the resident, who could answer the surveyor's inquiry in simple English. On the same day, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1), who stated that Resident #93 was refusing care, hitting and yelling at staff frequently. On 2/6/25 at 7:44 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #93, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) (AR) reflected that Resident #93 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate infection control practices for handling and storing linens observed in the laundry room and b.) ensure the clean linen room is free from soiled clothes and devices. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/5/25 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor and the Infection Preventionist (IP) observed the laundry room; the surveyor observed a cart full of linen. Some were in the plastic, and some were not, with no cover. The Housekeeping (HK) staff stated that all of those linens are clean and ready to be transported to the North unit, while the linen covered with plastics is from the residents who are no longer in the facility. The HK staff stated that after washing the linen, they put them inside the plastic, but he cannot explain why some of them were not in the plastic or not covered. On the same day, the surveyor observed piles of pillows almost touching the ceiling of the linen room; some were covered, and some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) that included refusal of care. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of 21 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered CP. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/4/25 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #93 lying in bed awake, screaming and yelling in their native language. A family member sat beside the resident, who could answer the surveyor's inquiry in simple English. On the same day, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1), who stated that Resident #93 was refusing care, hitting and yelling at staff frequently. On 2/6/25 at 7:44 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #93, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) (AR) reflected that Resident #93 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction (blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label, dispose and secure medications in four (4) of six (6) medication carts inspected and one (1) of three (3) medication refrigerators inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, the surveyor inspected the subacute medication cart in the presence of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1). The surveyor observed an unopened and undated Lantus insulin pen that had a pharmacy date of [DATE] and was stored in the medication cart. The surveyor also observed an unlocked medication refrigerator inside the nursing station that contained two (2) Vancomycin IV (intravenous) bags. The were no residents in the vicinity of the nursing station. At that time, the surveyor interviewed LPN#1 who stated once Lantus insulin pen is removed from the refrigerator that the insulin should have been dated. LPN #1 acknowledge that the medication refrigerator should have been lock and in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records accurately and completely in accordance with acceptable standards and practice by the Registered Dietitian (RD) not signing a nutrition note at the time of assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition and was evidenced by the following: On 2/04/25 at 11:02 AM, the surveyor observed and interviewed Resident #5 at bedside. The resident stated they have been in the facility for about three months and were currently on an altered consistency diet for dysphagia, but they were not sure when the RD had assessed them last. The surveyor reviewed Resident #5 electronic medical record (EMAR) including the resident's Face Sheet (an admission record) which revealed that the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included pneumonia, moderate protein-calorie…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the kitchen was found to be unclean. Work areas were in disrepair. Dishwashing was not conducted in accordance with current professional standards of sanitation, Concerns were noted with food storage, and tray line food temperatures were not within current professional safety standards. The failure to maintain required kitchen sanitation had the potential to affect 96 of 97 residents who received food stored, prepared, and served in the kitchen. Findings include: 1. The initial kitchen inspection was conducted on 01/23/23 from 9:27 AM through 10:27 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM). The following concerns were noted: a. The dishwasher was observed to be leaking and the dish machine floor was in poor repair. Rust was noted along the bottom of the stainless steel legs. The floor under the dishwasher was noted to be crumbling. b. The tile wall behind the three-compartment sink was observed to be covered with a grimy residue.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ