Millville Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 333 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 186 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 134.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse and take action to prevent further potential abuse for 1 of 10 residents (Resident [R] #3) R#3 reviewed for abuse. R2 alleged that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) abused R3. The facility failed to follow its abuse and neglect policy titled OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, conduct a thorough investigation of the incident, and failed to remove the CNA assigned to R3 on the shift identified in the allegation. On 03/04/26, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified at S483.12(c)2 and 483.12(c)3 related to the facility's failure to ensure a thorough investigation was completed after an allegation of staff to resident abuse was made on 02/10/26 and to prevent further potential abuse. On 03/04/26 at 8:20 PM, the Director of Nursing was notified of the IJ, which also constituted Substandard Quality of Care (SQC). The facility provided an acceptable Plan of Removal on 03/05/26 at 4:40 PM, which included staff training and suspension of staff. The IJ ran…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident [R] 1) reviewed for food allergies was not served foods to which the resident was allergic. R1 was noted to have food allergies to ketchup, vinegar, and mayonnaise. R1 was served two meals containing allergens. Serving residents foods to which they are allergic has the potential to lead to serious harm, injury, or death.The failure to follow its policy titled Allergies to ensure R1 was not served a food to which the resident was allergic placed this resident and all residents with food allergies at risk of serious harm, injury, or death. Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 03/03/26 at 12:20 PM when R1 was served mayonnaise and offered ketchup at the lunch meal. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 03/03/26 at 5:50 PM. The facility provided an acceptable removal plan on 03/04/26 at 5:33 PM.The removal plan included an audit of all resident diet orders and staff education on checking meal tickets and on not providing food items to residents to which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of clinical records and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) provide adequate supervision for a resident identified as a high risk for falls, b.) implement appropriate fall prevention interventions for a resident after sustaining multiple falls with a major injury, c.) update the resident's Care Plan in a timely manner, d.) perform neuro-checks (assess an individual's neurological functions, motor and sensory response, and level of consciousness) as per facility policy for a resident who had three falls resulting in head injuries. This deficient practice was identified for one of five residents, (Resident #193) reviewed for accidents. The resident had five (5) falls since 01/04/23, and three (3) out of 5 falls resulted in the resident sustaining head injuries. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/20/23 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor was touring the 300 unit and observed the staff mechanically lifting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident representative (RR) were given a transfer notice/discharge notice at the time the resident was transferred/discharged to the hospital for seven of seven residents (Residents (R) 180, R181, R21, R22, R42, R89, and R56) reviewed for hospitalization of 30 sample residents. This created the potential for the residents or their RR to have incomplete information, misunderstand the reason, and process for transfer or discharge, and the discharge appeal process. Findings include: 1. Review of R180's electronic medical record (EMR) titled Face Sheet located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R180's EMR titled general Progress Notes located under the Prog (Progress) note tab, dated 02/20/25, revealed the resident sustained a change in mental status and was combative with staff threw water at the nurse and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate a new PASARR [Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review] Level One for one of three residents (Resident (R) 22) reviewed for PASARR to reflect the admitting diagnosis of bipolar disorder of 30 sample residents. The failure to maintain a PASARR Level One that reflected the current diagnosis of R22 had the potential to delay or limit necessary assistance should R22 experience a bipolar episode that disrupted his daily life. Findings include: Review of R22's Census tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R22 was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Med Diag (Medical Diagnoses) tab located in the EMR revealed R22 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder as of 02/02/23. Review of the Care Plan (CP) under the Care Plan tab of the EMR revealed R22 had a focus with interventions related to psychotropic drugs for targeted behaviors initiated on 02/10/23. Review of R22's PASARR Level One, dated 10/16/17…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to dialysis when a resident started receiving hemodialysis for one of one resident (Resident (R)56) reviewed for dialysis of 30 sample residents. This had the potential for the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of R56's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an initial admission date of 01/06/21 and a hospital stay from 11/10/24 to 11/18/24. R56 returned from the hospital with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, and encounter for adequacy testing for hemodialysis. Review of R56's EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed a General note, dated 11/13/24, Hospital Update- .Hospital is also setting up outpatient dialysis following the permacath placement . Another General note, dated 11/19/24, documented Patient is currently on dialysis mon-wed-and Fri . Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program to include protocols to monitor extended antibiotic use for one of two residents (Resident (R) 35) reviewed for antibiotics of 30 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident safety related to antibiotic usage. Findings include: Review of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website titled, Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, dated 03/18/24 and located at https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/hcp/core-elements/nursing-homes-antibiotic-stewardship.html, indicated .Nursing homes monitor both antibiotic use practices and outcomes related to antibiotics in order to guide practice changes and track the impact of new interventions. Data on adherence to antibiotic prescribing policies and antibiotic use are shared with clinicians and nurses to maintain awareness about the progress being made in antibiotic stewardship. Clinician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 181226 Based on interviews and medical record review (MR) and other pertinent facility documentation on 12/11/24 and 12/12/24, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their Abuse Prohibition policy due to staff not reporting an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During an interview with the Surveyor on 12/11/24 at 11:57 A.M., Resident #3 stated that they were not able to remember the exact date, but about a week ago, Resident #3 asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #1 to wash their hair twice. They stated that CNA #1 yelled and stated that she does not have time for that. Resident #3 stated that they then began to cry. Resident #3 stated that they reported the incident to the Social Worker. Resident #3 further stated that after the incident was reported to the Social Worker, CNA #2 yelled at them, and said that they were going to get people in trouble. According to the admission Record (AR) Resident #3 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 181226 Based on interviews and medical record review (MR) and other pertinent facility documentation on 12/11/24 and 12/12/24, it was determined that facility staff failed to report an allegation of staff to Resident abuse to facility Administration and New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) according to their Abuse Prohibition policy due to staff not reporting an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #6). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During an interview with the Surveyor on 12/11/24 at 11:57 A.M., Resident #3 stated that they were not able to remember the exact date, but about a week ago, Resident #3 asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #1 to wash their hair twice. They stated that CNA #1 yelled and stated that she does not have time for that. Resident #3 stated that they then began to cry. Resident #3 stated that they reported the incident to the Social Worker. Resident #3 further stated that after the incident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 181226 Based on interviews and medical record review (MR) and other pertinent facility documentation on 12/11/24 and 12/12/24, it was determined that facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #6). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During an interview with the Surveyor on 12/11/24 at 11:57 A.M., Resident #3 stated that they were not able to remember the exact date, but about a week ago, Resident #3 asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #1 to wash their hair twice. They stated that CNA #1 yelled and stated that she does not have time for that. Resident #3 stated that they then began to cry. Resident #3 stated that they reported the incident to the Social Worker. Resident #3 further stated that after the incident was reported to the Social Worker, CNA #2 yelled at them, and said that they were going to get people in trouble. According to the admission Record (AR) Resident #3 was admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ00170135 Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) immediately, but not later than two hours for one of 12 sampled residents reviewed for abuse/neglect and injuries of unknown origin (Resident (R)10). This deficient practice had the potential to allow residents of suspected abuse to go unreported to the SSA. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, revised 10/24/22, revealed . Centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/patient (hereinafter patient) property, and exploitation for all patients. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the patient's medical symptoms. Centers also strive to comply with the Elder Justice Act (EJA). Under the EJA, employees are designated as mandated reporters and are obligated to immediately report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a patient. Reporting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ00156215 Based on record review, and interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provided services according to accepted standards of clinical practice with medication administration for one resident (Resident (R) 2) out of 25 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of Review of R2's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes, cirrhosis of the liver, anemia, and dependence on dialysis. Review of R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/12/24, revealed the resident was assessed to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the facility's investigation concluded on 07/13/22, revealed on 07/11/22,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ00171304 Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure basic infection control practices were followed to prevent cross contamination for two residents of three residents reviewed for wound care (Resident (R) 2 and R24) out of a sample of 25 residents. The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were followed by wearing required PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) and wound supplies were placed on a protective barrier when performing wound care. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infections. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes, cirrhosis of the liver, anemia, and dependence on dialysis. Review of R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/12/24, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$144,441 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $144,441 — penalty dated 2026-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ