North Cape Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 307 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 96.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the second-floor secure unit were provided with meals consistent with the meal schedule to include two of two second-floor dining rooms (Back dining room BDR and Front dining room FDR) and two of two residents (Resident (R) 15 and R3) of 42 residents residing on the second-floor secure unit. This failure had the potential to affect residents' routines and preferences. Findings include: Review of the Meal Schedule, dated 03/03/25 and provided by the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed lunch meals were to be delivered to seven residents seated in the second-floor secure unit Back Dining Room (BDR) at 12:00 PM, to the 11 residents seated in the Front Dining Room (FDR) at 12:30 PM, and 31 residents in their room at 12:30 PM. During an observation on 03/04/25 at 12:48 PM, meal tray carts were delivered to the second-floor secure unit. At 1:05 PM, three CNA's and two LPNs began passing the food trays to the residents. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store nebulizer masks for two of two residents (Resident (R) 71 and R78) observed for breathing treatments. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one of one resident (R44) and failed to follow proper infection control protocols while dispensing medication for one of one resident (R16) of 27 sample residents. These failures in infection control practices could significantly increase the risk of infections among residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R71's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed that R71 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and unspecified fracture of shaft of humerus, right arm. Review of R71's Physicians Order located in the EMR under the Orders tab, dated 02/20/25, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team had determined it was appropriate for a resident to self-care for a [NAME] tube for one of one resident (Resident (R) 27) out of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential for R27 to develop a respiratory infection due to no assessment of R27's ability to care for his [NAME] tube. Findings include: Review of R27's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R27 had been readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of heart failure, aphonia, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of the larynx. Review of R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/09/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of R27's EMR in its entirety revealed there was no documentation for an assessment that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility document review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a resolution to the concern for one of nine residents (Resident (R) 151) reviewed for grievances of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the outcome of concerns and grievances. Findings include: Review of R151's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R151 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of left ankle fracture. Review of R151's Grievance/Concern Form provided by the facility was dated 06/25/24 with the following concerns noted on the form: - .States a nurse on night shift tried to give her medications within 2-5 minutes [sic] of having administered them. - .Facility is dirty. States she [R151] saw blood on privacy curtain and blood on the shower grab bar (dates unknown). States there was feces on the floor when she went to take a shower (date unknown, no staff with her). - .Food is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of one resident (Resident (R) 27) reviewed for care plans out of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential to not receive the necessary care. Findings include: Review of R27's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R27 had been readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, aphonia, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of the larynx. Review of R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/09/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. R25 was also coded for oxygen therapy while a resident in the facility. Review of R27's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab in the EMR revealed the facility failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a splint device was placed according to physician's orders for one of one resident (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for range of motion of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential to lead to further contracture of her right hand. Findings include: Review of R9's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the most recent admission date of 06/15/18 and had diagnoses which included but not limited to right hand contracture, major depression, dry eye syndrome, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated resident was cognitively intact. Review of R9's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab, initiated on 06/15/18, revealed .[R9] has an ADL [activities of daily living] [R9] requires assistance for ADL care related to CVA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order prior to the administration of oxygen for one of three residents (Resident (R) 27) reviewed for oxygen of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential for R27 to have adverse reactions from the administration of oxygen. Findings include: Review of R27's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R27 had been readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, aphonia, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of the larynx. Review of R27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/09/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. R25 was also coded for oxygen therapy while a resident in the facility. During an observation on 03/03/25 at 12:30 PM, R27 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to create a homelike environment during dining by not removing food from serving trays and not posting the menu in the dining room. The deficient practice was observed on the first and second floor dining rooms. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/06/2023 at 12:49 PM, during lunch in the dining room on the second floor, Surveyor #2 observed that all residents in the dining room had their meals served on trays. Food was not removed from the trays and set on the table during dining. On 2/07/2023 at 12:26 PM, during lunch in the dining room on the first floor, Surveyor #1 observed that the menu display on the wall was empty. Further, Surveyor #2 observed that all residents in the dining room had their meals served on trays. Food was not removed from the trays and set on the table during dining. On the same date at 12:27 PM, during lunch in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-14 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that the facility had performed annual performance reviews of certified nurse aides (CNA) employed at the facility at least every 12 months. This deficient practice occurred for 5 of 5 CNA's reviewed for mandatory 12-hour in-service training and performance evaluations and was evidenced by the following: On 02/13/2023 at 8:57 AM, the surveyor reviewed 5 random facility CNA files for mandatory 12 hour in-service education and annual performance evaluations for the period of 1/1/2022 through 12/31/2022. Upon review of the 5 facility provided files it was determined that there was no documentation that the 5 CNA's reviewed received a performance evaluation for the aforementioned timeframe. On 2/14/2023 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor provided the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) with the list of 5 CNA's who were reviewed for annual in-service education and performance evaluations. The surveyor requested annual performance evaluations for the 5 CNA's reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/6/2023 from 9:20 to 10:12 AM the surveyor, accompanied by the Account Manager (AM), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. Upon entry to the dry storage room the surveyor observed (3) bulk storage containers. On top of the middle bulk storage container, which contained sugar, the surveyor and AM observed a plastic scoop used to access the bulk containers. The scoop was not covered and was exposed. The AM stated, That doesn't belong there. 2. On an upper shelf in the dry storage room, an opened container of Rainbow Sprinkles had an open date of 6/8/2022. On interview the AM stated, That's good for 6 months. Do you want me to toss that.? 3. Prior to entering the Walk-In Refrigerator, a review of the Refrigerator Temperature Log, Month: February Year: 2023, revealed that no PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ