No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Albuquerque Heights Healthcare and Rehabilitation

103 Hospital Loop NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (505) 348-8300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (505) 348-8300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 actual-harm citation$8,170 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (84) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,170 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-23)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4705 Montgomery Blvd NE · (505) 888-0443 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4710 Jefferson St NE · (505) 780-4044 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4950 Montgomery Blvd NE · (505) 883-8706 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Place of worship
4501 Montgomery Blvd NE · (505) 883-1300

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.3%11.3%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%0.9%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%2.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.6%11.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.6%14.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.7%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.5%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.8%22.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%15.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.671.651.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.082.811.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 215 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.1%CMS range 55.1–72.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.3–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.5–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.01
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 120.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-15)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

84 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 73 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident free from abuse for 1 (R #2) of 3 (R #2) residents reviewed for abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) was verbally and physically abusive to R #2 when providing care. This deficient practice likely resulted in emotional distress and trauma for R #2. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #2 revealed the following: - Schizophrenia (mental health disorder that affects an individual's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), - Alzheimer's disease (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), - Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (causes chronic, intense irritability and frequent angry outbursts), - Cognitive communication deficit (communication difficulty), - Anxiety, - Depression, - Metabolic encephalopathy (change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition). - This is not an all inclusive list. - R #2 was initially admitted to the facility in 01/09/18. B. On 08/23/24 at 1:23 pm, during an interview with R #2, she stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the facility provider (Physician, Nurse Practitioner) for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident, when staff failed to: Report R #1's follow-up blood pressure results to the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 as instructed.Document each time the NP #1 was notified after R #1's blood pressure was rechecked as ordered. If resident's experience a change in condition (CIC; a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains) and the facility nursing staff does not notify the provider as ordered, then residents are at an increased risk for deterioration in condition, delayed medical intervention, hospitalization, or additional complications. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 04/23/2026, revealed the following diagnoses: Type II Diabetes (DM2, a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin). Acute Cystitis (Bladder infection).Hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure).Third Degree Burns (Severe burns that destroy the skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident, when the facility nursing staff: Failed to administer intravenous (IV; into the vein) antibiotics as ordered by a physician. If residents do not receive medications as prescribed, they may experience incomplete treatment, worsening infection, or failure to achieve the intended therapeutic effects.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Administration of IV Fluids and Medications, dated 10/2024, revealed the following: To correctly and aseptically (free from contamination caused by harmful bacteria, viruses, or other microorganisms; surgically sterile or sterilized) set up the primary IV bag and administration set. Close the IV clamp (a small, manual device attached to the tubing of an IV set that is used to control or stop the flow of fluids or medications into a patient's bloodstream) on the administration set. Spike the IV bag (the process of connecting an IV administration set to a fluid filled IV bag so that the solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a physician-ordered therapeutic diet for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident, when the facility staff failed to: Provide a controlled carbohydrate (consistent or controlled; a meal plan designed to keep carbohydrate intake fairly equal at each meal and snack throughout the day and week to help stabilize blood sugar levels) diabetic diet as ordered by a physician for R #1. If physician-ordered therapeutic diets are not implemented as prescribed, then residents are likely to experience elevated blood sugars, difficulty chewing, inadequate nutritional intake, and an increased risk for further complications. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Food and Nutrition Policy, dated 05/01/2023, revealed diets are to be provided as ordered by the physician. B. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed a re-admission date of 04/30/26 with the following diagnoses: Type II Diabetes (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe and functional environment throughout the facility, as evidenced by failure to: Ensure bed footboards were maintained in safe working condition and free from damage. Ensure food remains was promptly cleaned from resident room floors. Ensure the 100-unit water dispenser area remained in good repair. Ensure laminate wooden floor slats were intact and not broken. Ensure the handrail in the 300 unit was free from damage. Ensure the 300 unit remained free from urine odors.These deficient practices exposed residents in the 100, 300, and 400 units to an unsafe and uncomfortable environment.The findings are:100 UnitA. On 02/02/26 at 9:45 a.m., during an observation of the 100-unit water dispenser area, observation revealed the water dispenser was positioned on a countertop with visible water damage to the surrounding surface. The countertop was darkened and discolored areas consistent with prolonged moisture exposure. The laminate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR; a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurate for 1 (R #1) of ( R #1) resident reviewed for PASRR accuracy. This deficient practice is likely to result in the facility not providing the services needed by residents who are identified in the screening process for additional care and services.The findings are:Record review of the facility's Pre-admission Screening for Mental Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability Patients policy, revised 02/16/24, revealed the Social Worker or designated staff will assure all patients with mental disorders and intellectual disability received appropriate pre-admission screenings according to Federal and State regulations. The policy stated if a PASARR was not completed or was incorrect, then Social Services would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect residents from the potential for accidents and hazards for 1 (R #20) of 4 (R #s 20, #21, #22 and #23) residents reviewed for falls by not preventing a resident from falling out of bed. This deficient practice could likely cause a resident to suffer health consequences such as a broken bone or a head injury. The findings are: A. Record review of R #20's face sheet revealed R #20 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Aphasia (inability or difficulty communicating),Hemiplegia cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body),Contracture (a shortening of muscles around joints causing joint stiffness and immobility). B. Record review of R #20's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) revealed R #20 was dependent for all of his activities of daily living (ADL's include dressing, eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for 3 (R #1, #4, and #7) of 3 (R #1, #4, and #7) residents when: R #1 and R #7 were not administered medications per physician orders. Transportation was not consistently provided to R #1, R #4, and R #7 for appointments. If the facility is not adhering to professional standards for quality improvement, then residents are unlikely to get the highest quality of care. The findings are: Repeat DeficienciesMedication Administration: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: End stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure),Dependence on renal dialysis (the process of removing extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys cannot function properly),Type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin and can cause nerve damage).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents who require dialysis (a treatment that helps remove waste products and excess fluids from the blood when the kidneys are not functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and physician orders for 2 (R #1 and R #7) of 4 (R #1, R #7 R #9 and R #10) residents reviewed for dialysis, when:The facility failed to provide adequate transportation to ensure residents attended scheduled dialysis treatments. This deficient practice led to the hospitalization of R #1 and R #7. If the facility is unable to meet the appointment needs for residents receiving dialysis treatments, then residents are likely to receive inadequate care and experience health complications. The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: End stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure),Dependence on renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed by ensuring a call light was within reach. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents not being able to call for help when needed. The findings are: A. On 12/11/25 at 7:55 am, during an observation and interview with R #4, R #4 was observed yelling from her room asking staff for help. R #4 stated she wanted a nurse because she was in pain and needed her pain medication. R #4's call light was under R #4's bed, stuck in between the bed wheels, and out of reach for R #4. R #4 confirmed she could not reach her call light, and she needed a nurse to administer pain medication. B. On 12/11/25 at 8:00 am, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, she confirmed R #4's call light was not within reach for R #4. CNA #1 stated R #4's call light should be within reach at all times.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean and sanitary for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for a homelike environment by not maintaining and regularly cleaning a resident's room. If the facility fails to maintain a homelike environment, then residents are likely to feel uncomfortable and could exacerbate (make worse) health issues. The findings are: A. On 12/11/25 at 7:55 am during an observation of R #4's room, R #4's room was unclean with a large area of dried liquid on the floor. Dried footprints were present indicating someone had walked through the liquid, leaving footprints on the floor. There was a napkin stuck on the dry liquid, with other tissues and unidentified debris on the floor. The floor appeared as if it had not been cleaned for several days. B. On 12/11/25 at 7:58 am, during an interview with R #4, she stated she had not seen housekeeping in her room for several days and she wanted her floor cleaned. C. On 12/11/25 at 8:15 am during an observation of R #4's room, R #4's room was dirty with the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 73 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were obtained to replace dentures (removable plate or frame holding one or more artificial teeth) for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) resident reviewed for dental care and services. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents not receiving dental care and services to meet their needs. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's dental service policy dated 09/15/25, indicated the facility is responsible for the loss or damage of dentures when the loss or damage is due to the facilities staff's misplacement, inadvertent disposal, and/or destruction of the dentures. B. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Severe protein calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets). C. Record review of R #5's Brief Interview of mental Status (BIMS; a screening for cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included interventions for transfer assistance consistent with the resident's assessed needs and physician orders for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed. If the facility fails to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan regarding a resident's transfer requirements, then staff may attempt unsafe transfer methods that increase the risk of falls, fractures, and other serious injuries. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Transfer and Lift policy, dated 03/01/24, stated residents requiring extensive or total assistance with transfers must be transferred using a mechanical lift with the assistance of two trained staff members. B. Record review of R #4's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosis of muscle weakness. C. Record review of R #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 07/03/2025, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment when the facility did not have enough bath towels and face cloths for the residents. This deficient practice could cause residents to miss a shower if there are not enough towels available. The findings are: A. On 06/09/25 at 10:55 am, during an interview, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) #15 stated the facility was always short on linens, such as sheets and towels. She stated there were times when they opened the linen storage closet, and there were not any linens at all. She stated she went to other units to get what they needed, but the other units did not have much either. B. On 06/09/25 at 11:22 am, during an interview, Family Member (FM) #1 stated she will try to clean up R #1, but there was often not any towels or facecloth for her to use. She stated the facility frequently did not have enough clean linens available. C. On 06/09/25 at 12:15 pm, during an interview, the Housekeeping Director (HD) stated they did not have enough linens. She stated the management staff ordered new towels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete when staff did not document the evening meal percentages for 9 (R #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) of 9 (R #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) residents reviewed for meal intakes. This deficient practice could likely cause the Registered Dietician (RD) to not implement nutrition interventions if the meals were not documented for the RD's consideration during resident record reviews. The findings are: A. Record review of the meal intakes, dated 05/12/25 through 06/10/25 indicated staff did not document the evening meals for R #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9. B. On 06/10/25 at 7:21 am, during an interview, Registered Nurse #3 stated she was not sure which shift should document the dinner meal intakes. She stated the dinner meal trays were still coming out, and residents were still eating dinner during the staff shift change. She stated the dinner meal intake documentation should be done by the evening shift staff. C. On 06/10/25 at 7:28 am, during an interview, Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive assessment completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #61) of 1 (R #61) resident reviewed for MDS assessments. This deficient practice could result in failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the resident's needs. The findings are: Cognition A. Record review of R #61's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/03/24 and included the following diagnoses: - Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement.) - Other symptoms and signs involving cognitive function and awareness. This is not an all inclusive list. B. Record review of R #61's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the following: - Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; screening for cognitive impairment) was not completed due to resident was rarely or never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a light meal or a snack for 1 (R #177) of 1 (R #177) before the resident left the facility to go to dialysis (a medical treatment which filters waste and excess fluid from the blood.) This deficient practice could potentially cause prolonged recovery time for the resident after dialysis. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Dialysis Policy, last revised on 08/07/23, revealed nutritional/fluid management included the provision of meals before, during, and after hemodialysis (dialysis) and monitoring intake and output measurements as ordered. B. Record review of R #177's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 03/19/25, with the following diagnoses: - Non-st elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction (a heart attack that happens when a part of the heart is not getting enough oxygen), - Congestive heart failure (the heart cannot supply enough blood to meet the body's needs), - Ischemic cardiomyopathy (a type of heart failure caused by low blood flow to the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths and showers for 2 (R #6 and #38) of 2 (R #6 and #38) residents sampled for ADLs when staff failed to: 1) Change R #6's soiled brief prior to assisting him to bed. 2) Clean and change R #38's ileostomy (a surgically made opening that connects your small intestine to your abdominal wall) bag. These deficient practices could likely result in residents being at a higher risk for infection and to feel unimportant, embarrassed and undignified. The findings are: R#6 A. Record review of R #6's face sheet, dated 07/23/24, revealed an initial admission date of 03/25/24. B. Record review of R #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 03/22/25, indicated R #6 required substantial staff assistance for toileting hygiene. C. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe and functional environment for resident rooms 205, 206, 207, 208, 211, and 213 when staff failed to: 1) Replace a broken plastic disposable glove holder in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 208. 2) Repair ripped flooring near a resident bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3) Repair the hand rail end piece outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4) Repair or replace a broken closet, a broken dresser, missing dresser drawer, broken blinds, and ripped flooring near the resident's bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 5) Maintain the shower in room [ROOM NUMBER] free of the storage of random items. 6) Replace broken blinds, cleaning a wall, and ensuring the room was free from a pungent (strong) urine odor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This deficient practice could likely result in residents living in an unsafe environment, could increase their risk for injuries, and decrease their quality of life. The findings are: A. On 04/08/25 at 11:20 am, observation of resident room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide mental health services for 1 (R #57) of 1 (R #57) resident after the resident witnessed his roommate unconscious and unresponsive as staff performed life saving procedures on the roommate. If residents are not provided with mental health services, then residents are likely to experience a decline in their psychosocial well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of R #33's face sheet revealed R #33 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. B. Record review of R #33's progress notes, dated [DATE], revealed R #33 was found unconscious in the bathroom of a suspected overdose of street drugs. R #33's son and R #57 (roommate) were in the room. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 and Physician Assistant (PA) performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; full code, an emergency procedure that combines chest compression with artificial ventilation) on R #33. C. Record review of R #57's face sheet revealed R #57 was admitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to discontinue a duplicate order of carvedilol (a blood pressure medication used to prevent high blood pressure and strokes in persons with heart disease or hypertension) for 1 (R #61) of 1 (R #61) resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice is likely to result in a resident failing to obtain maximum wellness or suffering prolonged illness. The findings are: A. Record review of R #61's face sheet, undated, revealed an initial admission date of 01/03/24 and included the following diagnoses: - Cerebral infarction (stroke) due to embolism (obstruction in a blood vessel) of bilateral (both sides) middle cerebral (relating to the brain) arteries. - Paroxysmal (sudden occurrence or increase of symptoms) atrial fibrillation (Afib; a type of irregular heartbeat.) - Essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure.) B. Record review of R #61's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2025, revealed the following: - Start date 04/04/24, End date: None. Carvedilol tablet 3.125 milligrams (mg).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect a treatment cart (a movable piece of equipment used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense treatment supplies and tools) from unauthorized access when staff failed to lock the treatment carts while staff were away from the cart. This failure had the potential to affect all 48 residents on the 300 Unit, as identified by the Resident Census provided by the Administrator on 04/07/25. If staff fail to lock an unsupervised treatment cart, then residents could obtain medial equipment which could result in injury or death. The findings are: A. On 04/07/25 at 11:50 AM, during an observation of the 300 Unit, the intravenous (IV; in the vein) treatment cart was unlocked and opened. Further observations revealed the cart had sterile needles and intravenous catheters (a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein to deliver fluids). Staff were not present in the area near the cart. B. On 04/07/25 at 11:55 AM, during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated the IV treatment cart was unlocked and opened. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve a meal that had been at a palatable temperature for 1 (R #177) of 1 (R #177) resident when staff left the resident's lunch tray on the bedside table while the resident was at dialysis. This deficient practice could cause a resident to not eat her lunch and could cause weight loss. The findings are: Cross referenced to F658 A. Record review of R #177's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 03/19/25 with the following diagnoses: - Non-st elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction (a heart attack that happens when a part of the heart is not getting enough oxygen), - Congestive heart failure (the heart cannot supply enough blood to meet the body's needs), - Ischemic cardiomyopathy (a type of heart failure caused by low blood flow to the heart muscle), - Type II diabetes (means that your body does not use insulin properly), - End stage renal disease (kidneys reach advanced state of loss of function), - Dependence on renal dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0777 — pattern
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering provider of critical laboratory results for 1 (R #180) of 1 (R #180) resident reviewed for change in condition. This deficient practice could cause a delay in treatment, creating a potential for harm or death to the resident. The findings are: A, Record review of R #180's face sheet revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 with the following diagnoses: - Hepatitis C (inflammation of the liver), - Type II diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition which results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), - Angina pectoris (a type of chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart) with presence of aortocornonary bypass graft (heart bypass surgery; a procedure to restore blood flow to areas of your heart), - Right foot amputation (loss of foot), - Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease (severe loss of kidney function), - Staphylococcus (bacteria that causes infection) - Psoas muscle (located in the pelvic area) abscess (collection of puss due to an infection.) B. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) facility regarding dialysis care and failed to monitor the resident before and after dialysis treatment for 2 (R #1 and R #2) of 2 (R #1 and R #2) residents reviewed for dialysis care. These deficient practices could likely result in the facility being unaware of the resident's condition, possible complications that arise during dialysis treatment, and residents may not receive the appropriate monitoring and care. The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 07/24/24 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure). B. Record review of R #1's physician orders revealed an order, revision date 10/30/24, for dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at 06:00 A.M. C. Record review of R #1'S Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: 1. Dialysis Communication Record, dated 09/04/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #10) of 1 (R #10) resident when the MDS Nurse did not document the decline in R #10's weight to reflect R #10's status at the time of the assessment. This deficient practice is likely to result in R #10 not receiving the appropriate care and treatment she needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #10's Comprehensive admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the MDS nurse documented R #10's weight as 180 pounds. B. Record review of R #10's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the MDS nurse documented the following: - R #10's weight as 163 pounds. - R #10 did not have a weight loss of 5 percent (%) or more in the last month. - R #10 did not have a weight loss of 10% or more in last 6 months. C. Record review of R #10's weight assessments revealed staff documented the following: - On 09/07/24, R #10 weighed 180.2 pounds. - On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident at nutritional risk or address the risk factors for impaired nutritional status for 1(R #10) of 1(R #10) resident. When the facility's staff failed to weigh R #10 weekly or when ordered by the facility's provider. This deficient practice could likely lead to the resident to suffer from unplanned weight loss. The findings are: A. Record review of R #10's facesheet dated 09/07/24, revealed the following: -R #10's admission date to the facility was 09/07/24. -R #10's discharge date to an assisted living facility (ALF) was 10/03/24. B. Record review of R #10's care plan dated 09/07/24, revealed Nurse #1 recorded R #10 was at nutritional risk for weight loss. C. Record review of R #10's provider's progress notes dated 09/26/24, revealed the following: 1. R #10 had a poor appetite and there was some concerns for possible weight loss. 2. R #10 had the following diagnoses: - Wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra (a fracture in the spine), - Poor appetite, - Confusion (a decline in cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor residents' choices for 3 (R #8, R #16 and R #17) of 3 (R #8, R #16 and R #17) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Ensure showers in resident rooms were in working order (including missing faucet knobs and having random items stored in them), which caused R #8 to utilize the community shower only on scheduled days/times rather than choosing the days and times she preferred to shower. 2. Ensure a female staff was available to provide showers per R #16 preference for female staff only for showers. 3. Ensure there were clean towels available for resident showers. These deficient practices are likely to cause frustration and diminish quality of life. The findings are: Resident #8 A. On 08/22/24 at 11:45 am, a random observation of resident shower in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there were items stored in the shower, and there was not a faucet knob on the shower. B. On 08/22/24 at 11:48 am during an interview, R #8 stated she would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for all residents on the 300 units (residents were identified by the resident census provided by the Administrator on 08/19/24) when they failed to: 1. Repair damaged and broken blinds in rooms 302, 307, 308, 314, 322, and 325. 2. Repair a damaged thermostat that controlled the 300 unit. 3. Repair 11 broken floor tieles and broken toilets in the shower room. 4. Ensure handrails were secured to the wall. 5. Repair four outlet faceplates on the 300 unit which were loose and not secured. 6. Ensure bed frames were not stored in the 300 Hallway. 7. Ensure there were enough towels available for the residents during showers. 8. Repair areas in 12 resident rooms with unpainted patchwork. 9. Repair missing faucet knobs, running faucets, broken blinds, sticky floors, and ensure random items, including medical equipment, were not stored in resident showers. These deficient practices could likely result in residents feeling frustrated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights in the residents' rooms were within reach of the resident while in bed or were accessible to them if they were in their wheelchair in the room for 6 residents (R #4, #5, #6, #7, #9 and #10) out of 7 (R #4, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10 and #11) reviewed for call lights. If the call lights are not accessible to the residents then their needs could likely go unidentified. The findings are: A. On 08/20/24 at approximately 12:30 pm, observations of the 300 unit revealed the following: - R #4 was in his wheelchair, and the call light was on the floor by the wall out of reach. - R #5 was asleep in bed, and the call light was observed on the floor out of reach. - R #6 was in bed and ate her lunch. The call light was on the desk behind her where she could not reach it. - R #7 was in her wheelchair by the bed, and the call light was on the floor by the curtain out of reach. - R #9 was in bed and ate lunch. The call light was wrapped around the bed rail behind her where she could not reach it. - R #10 lay in bed and her call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician or on call physician when facility staff had problems with a wound vacuum (wound vac; a type of therapy to help wounds heal, the device decreases air pressure on the wound and helps it heal more quickly.) functioning properly for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #3 and R #18) residents reviewed for wound vac care. This deficient practice of not notifying the physician and receiving further orders on how to continue with wound care could cause the wound to worsen or become infected. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #3 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Third degree burns (a serious injury that destroys all three layers of the skin: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis) of multiple sites on the right lower leg, foot, and ankle; - Seizures; - Cellulitis (serious bacterial infection of the skin) of right lower limb. B. Record review of the discharge hospital orders for R #3, dated 06/01/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders when facility staff were having problems with a wound vacuum (wound vac; a type of therapy to help wounds heal, the device decreases air pressure on the wound and helps it heal more quickly) functioning properly for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #3 and R #18) residents reviewed for wound vacuum care. This deficient practice of not following physician orders could likely cause the wound to go untreated, worsen, or become infected. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #3 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Third degree burns (a serious injury that destroys all three layers of the skin: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis) of multiple sites on the right lower leg, foot, and ankle; - Seizures; - Cellulitis (serious bacterial infection of the skin) of right lower limb. B. Record review of the discharge hospital orders for R #3, dated 06/01/24, indicated R #3 was discharged from the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the residents free from accidents failing to safely secure the arm of his wheelchair for 1 (R #12) of 1 (R #12) residents observed for falls. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #12 falling from R #12's wheelchair that could of resulted in injury. The finding are: A. On 08/20/24 during record review, shows that R #12, facesheet indicated that he suffered from Aphsia following a non-tramaumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) affecting his right side. B. On 08/20/24 during record review, shows that R #12 has new onset weakness per the residents care plan on 05/16/24. B. On 08/20/24 at 10:40 am, during an interview with Family Member (FM) #1, she expressed concern about R #12's wheelchair arm being broken and not clipping in to the wheelchair correctly when he was in it. She stated the wheelchair was not the proper wheelchair for him, and he did not received his custom wheelchair yet. C. On 08/20/24 at 3:17 pm, during an observation of the 300 unit, nine residents sat in the TV area and yelled out about an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a resident's care plan for 1 (R #2) of 2 ( R #2 and R #3) residents reviewed for a change in condition. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the care or treatment needed to ensure their overall safety or ability to maintain their highest practicable well being. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the pertinent diagnoses of unspecified dementia and other behavioral disturbance. B. Record review of R #2's physician notes, dated 04/14/24, revealed R #2 began to display a new symptom of increased phlegm (a specific type of mucus that originates in your lungs and throat). C. Record review of R #2's physician orders, dated 04/15/24, revealed an order for a suction machine at bedside as needed. D. Record review of R #2's care plan, last reviewed on 03/25/24, revealed staff did not document the need for a suction machine at bedside. E. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served to residents in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to: 1. Ensure all food items in the kitchen refrigerator and freezer were stored properly. 2. Ensure the kitchen pots, pans, and cooking utensils were cleaned properly. 3. Ensure the sanitizer sink water had the appropriate amount of sanitizer. 4. Ensure all food items are served at the appropriate temperature. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 127 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 1/22/24. These deficient practices are likely to expose residents to food borne illnesses. The findings are: Food Storage findings: A. Observation on 01/22/24 at 1:10 pm, during initial observation of the facility's food storage area, revealed the following: 1. One pack of 12 count (ct) flour tortillas opened to air and not dated. 2. One pack of French toast (6 ct.) opened to air and not dated. 3. One 30 pound (lb) box of vegetables…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 5 (R #'s 18, 23, 47, 53, and 65) of 5 (R #'s 18, 23, 47, 53, and 65) residents reviewed during random observation when staff failed to : 1. Serve all residents who were sitting at the same table in the 300 unit a meal at the same time. 2. Ensure Spanish speaking resident had proper intervention for their language barrier in place. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents feeling as if their feelings and preferences are unimportant to the facility staff. The findings are: Findings related to meals A. On 01/26/24 at 6:20 pm during a dinner observation in the 300 unit: 1. R #'s 18, 47, 53, and 65 sat at the same table. 2. At 6:25 pm, staff served R #47 her dinner tray, and R #'s 18, 53, and 65 watched her eat. 3. At 6:49 pm, staff served R #65 his dinner tray, and R #'s 18 and 53 watched R #47 and #65 eat. 4. At 6:51 pm, R #53 was served her dinner, and R #18 watched R #47, 53, and 65 eat. 5. At 6:53 pm staff served R #18 her dinner tray. B. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for 7 (R #'s 11, 20, 23, 39, 55, 68 and 89) of 7 (R #'s 11, 20, 23, 39, 55, 68, and 89) residents when staff failed to: 1. Ensure call light were within residents' reach for R #'s 11, 20, 39 and 68. 2. Ensure residents attended medical appointments for R #'s 23, 55, and 89. These deficient practices are likely to result in the residents not being able to call for help when needed, and residents not receiving the appropriate medical care as desired resulting in an exacerbation (to make worse) of current medical conditions. The findings are: Call lights A. Record review of the care plan for R #11, revised on 05/01/21, revealed staff to place the call light within resident's reach while in bed or close proximity to the bed. B. Record review of the care plan for R #20, revised on 10/21/16, revealed staff to place the call light within resident's reach while in bed or close proximity to the bed. C. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify residents of the findings of their grievances. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not considering the needs of the residents and lead to a decrease in resident quality of life. The findings are: A. On 01/26/24 at 11:14 AM during an interview with Resident's Council members, residents stated the facility sometimes notified them of the results of their grievances in writing, sometimes verbally, and sometimes not at all. The residents said the facility was not consistent. B. Record review of the resident grievance forms for the last three months months revealed the forms were blank under the resolution of grievance section for all grevience forms filed. C. On 01/26/24 at 8:56 AM during an interview with Activities Director (AD), he stated he verbally took resident council grievances to the department heads. He said the department heads gave him a verbal response, and he discussed the responses at the following month's resident council meeting. The AD stated there was not a written follow-up for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean, in good condition, and free from wall debris for 8 (R #'s 5, 22, 24, 45, 67, 80, 81, and 87) of 8 (R #'s 5, 22, 24, 45, 67, 80, 81, and 87) residents sampled for a homelike environment. Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner, is likely to result in unsafe conditions and prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. The findings are: A. On 01/23/24 at 11:17 am during an observation of resident occupied room [ROOM NUMBER], a scrape, which measured approximately 2 foot (ft) in length and 1 ft in height, had exposed drywall and was located by the baseboard on a wall near the bathroom. There were also eight unpainted drywall patches in various sizes on the wall. B. On 01/31/24 at 9:02 am during an observation of resident occupied room [ROOM NUMBER], a scrape, which measured approximately 2 ft in length and 7 inches in height, had exposed drywall and was located by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for 2 (R #22 and #27) out of 2 (R #22 and #27) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Update a care plan to reflect CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure; a machine that keeps your airways open while you sleep so you can receive oxygen) use for R #22. 2. Conduct quarterly care plan meetings as required for R #27. These deficient practices are likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' care needs and preferences, and residents not receiving the needed care. The findings are: Findings for R #22: A. Record review of R #22's face sheet revealed R #22 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #22's physician orders dated 05/04/21 revealed an order for CPAP back-up rate: pending evaluation. Oxygen liter flow at two liters (L). Apply at bedtime and remove in morning. Interface type: Nasal pillow/mask/full face mask. Humidification, if appropriate, heated or cool fill humidifier with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (R #4 and #62) of 2 (R #4 and #62) residents when staff failed to: 1. Change R # 4's empty oxygen (O2) humidifier. 2. Change O2 tubing per physician orders for R #62. If the facility is not changing and labeling oxygen tubing then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: Findings for R #4: A. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R#4's physician orders, dated 01/31/2024, revealed an order for oxygen at one to six liters (L) per minute via nasal cannula (a small, flexible tube that delivers oxygen to the nose through soft prongs). C. On 1/30/24 at 10:53 am during an observation, R #4's O2 humidifier bottle was empty. D. On 01/30/24 at 10:56 am during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed R #4's O2 humidifier bottle was empty and should not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and well-being for 3 (R #78, #128 and #143) of 3 (R #78, #128, #143) residents reviewed for activities when staff failed to: 1. Provide meaningful individualized activities based upon residents' interests as identified on their individual care plans. 2. Encourage activities in a convenient community setting. If residents are not provided or encouraged to attend and participate in activities that meet their interests, are enjoyable, and enhance their social and emotional well-being, then they are likely to experience an increase in boredom, isolation, and depression. The findings are: A. On 01/22/24 during observation of the 100 skilled care unit, between the hours of 1:30 pm and 3:30 pm, activity staff were not present and did not offer activities. B. Record review of the daily activity calendar, dated January 2024, revealed the following activities scheduled for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review of Certified Nurses Aides (CNAs) for 5 (CNAs) #1, #3, #4, #5, and #6) of 5 (CNAs #1, #3, #4, #5, and #6) randomly reviewed. If the facility is not maintaining the annual performance reviews then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate care and services, and the CNA's may not meet the needs of all residents. The findings are: CNA #1 Findings: A. Record review of the facility staffing log revealed CNA #1 was hired on 08/03/21. B. Record review of CNA #1's annual clinical competency validation (annual performance review) could not be completed due to the facility did not provide CNA #1's annual performance review. C. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated January 2024, revealed CNA #1 worked 15 days throughout the month. CNA #3 Findings: D. Record review of the facility staffing log revealed CNA #3 was hired on 08/16/22. E. Record review of CNA #3's annual clinical competency validation, dated 02/04/23, revealed a proctor did not sign and validate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 (R #'s 27 and 53) of 2 (R #'s 27 and 53) residents reviewed for behavioral health concerns received necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs when staff failed to: 1. Ensure R #27 was seen soon by a psychiatric provider after experiencing suicidal ideations while in the facility. 2. Ensure effective communication between the facility and psychiatric (psych) providers and consistent psychiatric services regarding R #53's psych service needs. These deficient practices are likely to result in the residents not receiving the behavioral or mental health care and assistance needed to improve mood and reduce depression and anxiety. The findings are: Findings for R #27: A. Record review of R #27's face sheet revealed R #27 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Suicidal Ideations (thinking about or planning suicide) 2. Major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of no less than 12 hours per year for 3 (CNA #4, #5, and #6) of 5 (CNA #1, #3, #4, #5, and #6) CNAs randomly reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the nurses aides not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: CNA #4 Findings: A. Record review of the facility staffing log revealed CNA #4 was hired on 11/21/19. B. Record review of CNA #4 yearly required in-service training, dated 11/21/22 through 11/22/23, revealed CNA #4 completed 6 hours and 28 minutes of training for the year, not the required 12 hours. C. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated January 2024, revealed CNA #4 worked 14 days throughout the month. CNA #5 Findings: D. Record review of the facility's staffing log revealed CNA #5 was hired on 06/10/21. E. Record review of CNA #5 yearly required in-service training, dated 06/10/22 through 06/10/23, revealed CNA #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote resident choices when staff did not assist residents with a new medication per their request and preference or communicate the status of the medication request for 1 (R #21) of 1 (R #21) residents reviewed for choices. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident's personal choices, needs, and preferences not being honored. The findings are: A. Record review of R #21's face sheet revealed R #21 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement) with dyskinesia (uncontrolled jerking, dance-like or wriggling movements). 2. Major depressive disorder. 3. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event.) B. Record review of R #21's psychiatric progress note, dated 10/30/23, revealed R #21 was found sitting in chair at bedside. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 (R #83) of 3 (R #s 80, 83, and 328) residents reviewed for timely Beneficiary Protection Notification received the correct notifications. This deficient practice can result in confusion for the resident or their representative as to what services they have or do not have financial coverage for under Medicare A. The findings are: A. Record review of Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review for R #83 revealed the record did not contain documentation to show staff issued CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Service) form 10055: Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) to R #83 who intended to continue services. The facility provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. B. On 01/30/24 at 12:13 pm during an interview with the Facility Administrator, he stated staff did not provide CMS 10055 to R #83 prior to discharge, but they should have.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an effective discharge plan that included a facility provider (Nurse Practitioner (NP), Physician's Assistant (PA), and Physician) for 1 (R #149) of 1 (R #149) residents reviewed for discharge planning (the process of transitioning a resident from one level of care to the next). This deficient practice is likely to result in complicated or unsafe transitions from the facility to the residents' post-discharge settings. The findings are: A. Record review of R #149's face sheet revealed R #149 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to a private residence with no home health services on 11/24/23. B. Record review of R #149's physician progress note, dated 11/08/23, revealed the resident had a history of alcohol dependence and was recently admitted to the hospital for confusion, subdural hematoma (a type of brain bleed that occurs within the skull but outside the actual brain tissue) and a mechanical fall (a fall caused by gravity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) was maintained for 1 (R # 25) of 1 (R # 25) resident when staff failed to ensure R #25 received restorative therapy (therapy in which a patient trains on abilities they already have to perfect them and helps maintain physical abilities to perform ADLs.) If the facility does not ensure that residents receive restorative services, then the residents are likely to experience a decrease in their ability to walk, transfer, and do other activities of daily living. The findings are: A. Record review of R #25's face sheet revealed R #25 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #25's Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed, the resident had good range of movement, to receive restorative range of motion program and therapy band- resistance band routine, per written handout and as needed. C. Record review of R #25's physician orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for facial hair shaving for 1 (R #27) of 1 (R #27) residents reviewed for ADL care when staff failed to: 1. Offer to shave R #27's facial hair. 2. Provide the correct facial hair shaving equipment for R #27. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #27's care plan, dated 05/11/23, revealed the following: - Focus: [Name of R #27] was at risk for decreased ability to perform ADLs. - Interventions: Provide cueing for safety and sequencing to maximize current level of function. Arrange resident/patient environment as much as possible to facilitate ADL performance. B. On 01/23/24 at 5:03 pm during an interview with R #27, he stated he did not like his beard, but he did not have anybody to shave him. The resident said he asked a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) before to shave him. R #27 had a beard and mustache which measured approximately 1 to 2 inches in length. R #27 stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (mechanical purification of blood in place of normal kidney function) facility regarding dialyses care and services for 1 (R #23) of 2 (R #23 and #45 ) residents reviewed for dialysis. If the facility is unaware of the status, condition, or complications that arise during dialysis treatment then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate monitoring and care they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #23 face sheet, dated 01/31/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include: - End stage renal disease (advanced disease and failure of the kidneys), - Heart failure, - Dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis, B. Record review of R #23 provider revealed an order, dated 01/17/24, for dialysis at (name of dialysis provider) every Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 6:00 am. C. Record review of a dialysis folder, held at the nurses station,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to schedule an appointment for dental services for 1 (R #19) of 1 (R #19) residents sampled for dental services. This deficient practice could likely result in continued dental pain or infection for the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of R #19's Hospital Transfer Orders dated 01/13/24 revealed the following: Other special instructions: Patient needs to see dentistry for evaluation. B. On 01/22/24 at 4:18 PM, during an interview with R #19, she stated she was waiting for staff to schedule a dental appointment for her after her recent hospital stay due to dental problems. C. On 01/26/24 at 1:00 PM, during an interview with the Scheduler, she stated that nursing reviewed the resident's transfer or admitting orders, and they let her know what appointments need to be scheduled for the residents. She further stated she did not receive a request to schedule a dental appointment for R #19. D. On 01/30/24 at 3:43 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated the admitting nurse or unit manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for 1 (R #228) of 1 (R #228) resident reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff confusion as to the services and treatment provided. The findings are: A. Record review of R #228's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include: - Sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection. Occurs when chemicals released in the bloodstream to fight an infection trigger inflammation throughout the body), - Dementia (a progressive condition in which a person's mental abilities declines), - The resident was discharged from the facility on 12/08/23 at 6:37 pm., to an acute care hospital. B. Record review of New Mexico Department of Health complaint #71174 revealed emergency medical providers (EMT) responded to a call at the facility regarding R #228 on 12/08/23 at 7:30 pm. EMT's transported R #228 to hospital. C. Record review of R #228's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1-3) residents reviewed for hypoglycemia [a condition in which your blood sugar levels drop below the specified limits (less than 70)] by not ensuring meals are served timely. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents experiencing a change in condition. The findings are: A Record review of progress note for R #1, dated 10/29/2023 at 4:13 PM, revealed R #1 had a hypoglycemic episode at 2:41 PM as lunch was being served. Resident was noted to be awake but slowly leaning to one side and responses slow. The resident's capillary blood glucose (CBG; the amount of glucose/sugar in your blood. Normal is between 70 and 100) test result was 49 CBG. The resident was immediately administered yogurt, orange juice, small amount of ice cream, and glucose gel (medication used to treat very low blood sugar) per standing order. The resident's CBG rebounded to 106 CBG within about 15 minutes. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to deliver meals consistently and timely to all 127 residents that receive room trays or eat in the dining room. This deficient practice is likely to cause frustration, hunger, and hypoglycemic episodes [a condition in which your blood sugar levels drop below the specified limits (less then 70)] for residents with diabetes [a chronic medical condition where your blood sugar (glucose) levels are consistently high]. The findings are: A. Record review of meal service times, as posted in the facility, revealed: - Unit 400: Breakfast 6:45 to 6:55 AM, lunch 11:30 to 11:40 AM, dinner 4:30 to 4:40 PM, - Unit 100: Breakfast 6:56 to 7:06 AM, lunch 11:41 to 11:51 AM, dinner 4:41 to 4:51 PM, - Dining room: Breakfast 7:07 to 7:17 AM, lunch 11:52 AM to 12:02 PM, dinner 4:52 to 5:02 PM, - Unit 200 Breakfast 7:18 am to 7:28 AM, lunch 12:03 PM to 12:13 PM, dinner 5:03 to 5:13 PM - Unit 300: Breakfast 7:29 to 7:39 AM, lunch 12:14 to 12:24 PM, dinner 5:14 to 5:30 PM. B. On 11/02/23 at 6:08 PM, during dining observation of the main…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide sufficient support staff to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents' dietary needs not being met and longer waits for meal service for all 127 residents residing at the facility. The findings are: A. On 10/30/23 the following was observed in the facility kitchen: 1. Food items were expired and stored in the facility refrigerators. 2. Food items were not properly labeled and dated. 3. Temperature logs were not utilized 4. Facility was not kept free of dirt/grime/debris. 5. Ice machine was not cleaned according to cleaning schedule. 6. Hand wash sink was not clean and available for use by dietary staff. 7. Correct menu was not posted for the day. 8. Snacks were not available for diabetic residents. 9. Meal services were not delivered on a timely manner B. Record review of dietary schedule, dated 10/22/23 to 10/02/2,3 revealed there were 3 full-time employees and a Dietary Manager scheduled in the kitchen to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-27 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide hydration between meals by not: 1. Ensuring there was process or a responsible department to pass out clean water pitchers/water during the day/night. 2. Ensuring there were water pitchers available for residents use. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 127 residents residing in the facility resulting in residents becoming at increased risk for dehydration. The findings are: A. On 10/26/23 at 11:00 am during initial tour of the facility, water pitchers were not available at residents' bedside tables in several of the residents rooms (rooms 205, 316, 320, 305, 411, 302, 301 and 105). B. On 10/26/23 at 11:20 am during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), he stated. We do send out hydration on the meal carts, but other then that, I am not sure how hydration is given. I do not know if every resident has a water pitcher. I have not gotten any water pitcher in the kitchen to be changed out. I need to get a head count so I can order water pitchers. The process would be that the nursing staff would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions.This deficient practice is likely to affect all 127 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 10/26/23 and is likely to lead to foodborne illnesses, if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are adhered to. The findings are: On 10/30/23 at during 11:40 am during initial tour of facility kitchen the following was observed: 1. Expired food items left in the facility refrigerators. 2. Food items stored in the facility refrigerator were not properly labeled and dated. 3. Food service employees did not wear hair restraints (Dietary Manager) and beard restraints at all times while in the facility kitchen (dietary aide). 4. Personal food items stored in the facility refrigerators not dated or labeled. 5. Frozen food items were not properly thawed out (not under running cool water). 6. Cold food items were not kept on ice during meal service. 7. Dirty trash cans uncovered and with trash stored next to food prep stations. 8.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed by not obtaining physicians orders to treat, monitor, and document an injury of unknown origin on R #1's right arm. If the facility is not documenting or monitoring an injury of unknown origin then the resident is likely to not receive the necessary treatment needed to heal the wound. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's Face sheet identified the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Seizures, contusion, history of falls, anxiety disorder, dysphagia (impaired production of speech resulting from brain disease or damage), and benign prostatic hyperplasia age-related enlarged prostate gland). B. Record review of R #1's care plan, dated 05/06/23, identified resident was dependent for mobility, related to weakness, and required assistance/was dependent for ADL (activities of daily living) care with total assist of 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documents in resident records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #'s 1 and 2) residents, when they failed to accurately document resident's completed/offered baths/showers. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not having the information they need to provide competent, comprehensive care and services if vital information is missing from the resident's medical documents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's care plan dated 03/12/23 revealed, Focus: [Name of R #1] is dependent for ADL care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting) related to: debility 2/2 [2 of 2] BLE [bilateral left extremity] weakness and prolonged hospitalization w/ [with] chronic pain. Interventions: Provide resident/patient with total assist of 2 (specify #) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by not ensuring the facility was free from pests. This deficient practice is likely to expose all 88 residents residing in the facility to the spread of disease/infection by way of carrier (cockroaches, spiders). The findings are: A. Record review of pictures provided by R #2's sister dated 06/26/23, revealed R #2's restroom with cockroaches in his shower. B. On 08/01/23 at 11:34 am during an interview with R #2's sister, she confirmed she saw cockroaches in R #2's shower and took pictures of the insects. R #2's sister also confirmed she informed the Administrator (ADM) of the insect issue. C. On 08/02/23 at 8:09 am during an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, a spider was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A's shower. D. On 08/03/23 at 10:34 am, during an interview with Maintenance Director (MD), he stated, This problem [with insects] has been on going. Recently, I reached out to our Pest Company to come to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview the facility failed to consistently offer snacks to all 125 residents residing in the facility. This deficient practice is likely to cause frustration and unnecessary hunger with the residents. The findings are: A. On 01/09/23 at 1:46 pm during an interview with R #37, he stated that snacks are not offered during the day or at night and he would like to have a snack. B. On 01/09/23 at 2:56 pm during an interview with R #12 he stated that he is not offered snacks and would like snacks. C. On 01/09/23 at 3:55 pm during interview with R #174 he stated that the facility does not offer snacks. D. On 01/17/23 at 3:50 pm during interview with Registered Dietitian she stated that she puts in orders for evening diabetic snacks. She further stated that residents can request snacks if they would like a snack. The kitchen closes at 7 pm and ordered diabetic snacks are passed out at 10 am, 2 pm and 5 pm. E. On 01/18/23 at 7:49 PM during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, he stated. All available snacks are for residents that have snacks ordered such as any resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not: 1. Ensuring food and beverage items in the refrigerator, freezer, and kitchen were properly labeled and dated. 2. Ensuring food items in the refrigerator and freezer were properly stored. 3. Ensuring food and beverage items are labeled, dated, and stored appropriately in the 300 unit nourishment refrigerators and freezers. 4. Ensuring food items were not expired in the kitchen refrigerator. 5. Ensuring food items were not stored on the floor. 6. Ensuring the kitchen floor was clean and free from trash and debris. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 125 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 01/09/23. If the facility fails to adhere to safe food handling practices residents are likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). The findings are: A. On 01/09/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 12 (R #'s 8, 10, 15, 30, 32 ,34, 37, 40, 45, 88, 91, and 175) of 12 (R#'s 8, 10, 15, 30, 32, 34, 37, 40, 45, 88, 91, and 175) residents reviewed during random observation by: 1. Referring to residents that require dining assistance as feeders. 2. Not removing meals from serving trays during meal times for any residents eating in the main facility dining room making it a non homelike environment. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents feeling as if their feelings and preferences are unimportant to the facility staff. The findings are: Dining Assistance/Feeders Findings: A. On 01/11/23 at 4:51 pm during a 300 unit observation, a dry erase board posted at the unit nursing station revealed, Feeders/Cueing: 302B (R #8), 306A (R #88), 307B (R #40), 311B (R #175), 313B (R #37), 315A (R #30), 318A (R #45), 322B (R #10), 323A (R #32), 323B (R #91), 324A (R #15), 325B (R #34). B. On 01/11/23 at 5:42 pm during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences for 2 (R #'s 12 and 15) of 3 (R #'s 12, 15, and 41) residents reviewed by not: 1. Ensuring R #12 had access to his call light. 2. Ensuring R #15 was dressed in his own clothing and not in a hospital gown. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents feeling embarrassed and that their preferences are not important to the facility; and residents being unable to request assistance, such as needing help with transferring, after falling or other acute distress. The findings are: R #12 Call Light Findings: A. Record review of R #12's care plan dated 09/29/22 revealed, Focus: [Name of R #12] is at risk for falls d/t [due to] LLE [left lower extremity] tibia/fibula fracture, (front lower leg) impaired mobility, history of falls/lowering to floor. Interventions: Place call light within reach while in bed or close proximity to the bed. B. On 01/09/23 at 3:03 pm during an observation and interview with R #12, R #12's call light is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that 4 (R #12, 98, 103, and 182) of 4 (R #12, 98, 103 and 182) resident's records reviewed for advanced directives (legal documents that allow you to spell out your decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) were complete. This deficient practice could likely affect residents' fulfillment of their end of life medical care choices and could likely result in unnecessary suffering for the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's MOST form (Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment) revealed section C (Artificially Administered Hydration/Nutrition) and section D (who was it discussed with) were left blank. B. Record review of R #98's MOST form revealed section B (Medical interventions), section C (Artificially Administered Hydration/Nutrition) and section D (who was it discussed with) were left blank. C. Record review of R #103's MOST form revealed section B (Medical interventions), section C (Artificially Administered Hydration/Nutrition) and section D (who was it discussed with) were left blank. D.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that is safe and at a comfortable temperature by not ensuring a functioning thermostat for 1 (R #12) of 2 (R #12 and #28) residents reviewed for room temperatures. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling unsafe or uncomfortable if the facility fails to maintain the building in a safe and homelike environment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's face sheet revealed R #12 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and resided in Room (RM) #304-A. B. On 01/09/23 at 2:55 pm during an interview and observation with R #12, R #12's room (RM #304-A) was noted to be uncomfortably hot. R #12 stated, Its too hot. I don't like it. It's been like this for awhile and I've told them about it. R #12's room thermostat is observed to be at 88 degrees Fahrenheit. R #12 stated he had told various facility staff but was unable to recall staff names. C. On 01/09/23 at 3:07 pm during an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that grievances by residents are responded to timely for 2 (R #3 and #12) of 2 (R #3 and #12) residents reviewed. If the facility is not ensuring that grievances are responded to timely, then residents are likely at risk of continued/repeat concerns and feeling as though their concerns are unimportant to the facility. The findings are: Findings for R #3: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #3's progress notes dated 10/11/22 revealed, Resident c/o [complains of] to Dietary someone had taken money from her wallet, $80 missing since few weeks ago, Per sister [Name of R #3's sister] resident did want some cash on hand and also warned resident you don't need money, I bring you stuff you ask for, resident persistent and given $100 cash, resident went to appt [appointment] yesterday with sister and only had $20 cash in wallet. Call placed to sister and stated she probably…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 (R #9) of 1 (R #9) residents reviewed. If the facility is not updating the care plan to reflect the resident's current care areas and treatment, then the facility may not be providing the appropriate care and treatment to meet the residents' needs. The findings are: A. On 01/11/23 at 11:13 am during record review of R #9's medical record revealed: 1. Care Plan dated 04/25/22 identified that resident requires an indwelling Foley catheter (a hollow, flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder through the urinary opening) due to retention (when a person is unable to empty their bladder). 2. Physicians Orders dated 07/14/22 at 5:20 pm revealed that the order for Foley catheter care (orders to clean catheter, empty drainage bag, and to change the catheter if it becomes clogged) were discontinued (removed or stopped). B. On 01/11/23 at 2:29 pm during interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4, she stated. Resident does not have a catheter, she is able to toilet herself and wears briefs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (R #'s 8, 59) of 2 (R #'s 8, 59) residents by: 1. Providing oxygen (O2) to R #8 without physician orders. 2. Not labeling, dating, and changing O2 tubing in accordance with physician orders for R #59 If the facility is providing O2 without physician orders, or not changing and labeling oxygen tubing per physician orders, then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: Findings for R #8: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed R #8 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 01/09/23 at 12:13 pm during a dining observation, R #8 is observed wearing portable O2. C. Record review of R #8's physician orders revealed no order present for O2 use. D. Record review of R #8's O2 Sats (Saturations) Summary dated 01/01/23-01/19/23 revealed R #8 wearing O2 on 18 out of 19 days. E. On 01/09/23 at 12:14 pm during an interview with Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance with showering for 1 (R #66) of 2 (R #'s 66 and 78) resident reviewed for showers. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are A. Record review of R #66's face sheet revealed R #66 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and resided in Room (RM) #311-B. B. Record review of R #66's care plan dated 10/03/22 revealed, Focus: [Name of R #66] requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting related to: Limited mobility. Interventions: Provide resident/patient with total assist of 2 for transfers. C. Record review of the Unit 300 Shower Sheet dated 12/15/22 revealed R #66 should be offered a shower on Tuesday and Friday nights. D. Record review of R #66's Documentation Survey Report dated 12/01/22-12/31/22 revealed R #66 was offered 6 baths/showers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that 2 (R #'s 9 and 51) of 2 (R #'s 9 and 51) residents reviewed received care and treatment that met the resident's needs by not updating hospice binders to include hospice notes/records and documenting hospice communication. If the facility fails to communicate with other entities that are providing care it is likely residents physical, mental, and psychosocial well being may decline. The findings are: Findings for R #9: A. Record review of R #9's physician order dated 07/15/22 revealed, Admit to Hospice [Name of Hospice Provider] DX [diagnosis]: Systolic heart failure with protein calorie malnutrition.(heart is not pumping enough blood throughout the body) B. On 01/12/23 at 12:43 pm during an observation, R #9's hospice communication binder was not present at the 300 unit nursing station. (Unit R #9 resides in) C. On 01/12/23 at 12:44 pm during an interview the Unit Manager (UM) #1, she stated, I don't have it [R #9's hospice documentation] up here [300 unit nursing station]. UM #1 confirmed R #9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review of 2 Certified Nurses Aide (CNA #5 and #6) of 5 (Certified Nurses Aide #5, #6, #7, #8, #9) randomly reviewed. If the facility is not maintaining the annual performance reviews then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate care, services and may not meet the needs of all residents. The findings are: A. During record review of CNA #5's employee personnel file it was revealed that the last annual performance review was completed on 06/11/21 B. During record review of CNA #6's employee personnel file it was revealed that the last annual performance review was completed on 08/10/18 C. On 01/20/23 at 4:50 pm during an interview with the Director of Nursing, she stated, it would be her expectation that all annual performance reviews be up to date. D. Record review of Nurse Aide Nursing and Certification Policy dated 10/24/22 revealed: 7. The service location must complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #'s 41) of 2 (R #'s 37 and 41) residents reviewed for behavioral health concerns were receiving necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs by not: 1. Ensuring R #41 was seen by Psychiatry on a regular basis. 2. Ensuring medications recommended by Psychiatry were reviewed and documented as to why R #41 was not provided or administered the medication. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents not receiving the behavioral or mental health care and assistance they require that has the potential to improve mood and reduce depression and anxiety. The findings are: Psychiatry Visits Findings: A. Record review of R #41's face sheet revealed R #41 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. ADULT FAILURE TO THRIVE 2. SUICIDAL IDEATIONS 3. UNSPECIFIED MOOD [AFFECTIVE] DISORDER 4. RESTLESSNESS AND AGITATION 5. MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, UNSPECIFIED B. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for efficacy (effectiveness) /proper dosing of medication for 1 (R #51) of 1 (R #51) resident reviewed for pain. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents receiving unwarranted medications, with an increased likelihood of negative side effects or drug interactions. The findings are: A. On 01/18/23 8:05 PM , during observation of R #51, she was observed ambulating (walking) throughout the unit via wheelchair, resident did not appear to be in any distress (pain or discomfort). B. On 01/18/23 at 8:08 PM during observation Registered Nurse (RN) #1 asked R #51 if she had pain. R #51 stated that she had a headache and was administered Tylenol extra strength tablet 1000 mg (milligrams) (medication used to treat pain) at 19:52 (7:52 pm). R #51 was not asked her pain level, at 19:56 (7:56 pm) it is documented that medication was effective. C. Record review of Physicians orders with a start date of 07/29/22 revealed Tylenol Extra strength tablet 500 mg (milligram) give 1000 mg by mouth as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that medications and supplies are stored securely (locked) and out of reach of residents and visitors on the 100, 300 and 400 units medication and treatment carts. 2. Ensure that expired medications were not being stored with unexpired medications on the 200 units medication cart. 3. Ensure that medications were stored properly and not found out of package and laying in bottom of drawer inside of medication cart on the 200 unit. 4. Ensure that expired medications were not being stored with unexpired medications in the 100 and 300 units medication storage rooms. 5. Failed to label and lock alcoholic beverages for residents found stored inside the medication storage room on the 300 unit. 6. Failed to secure discarded medications by not locking the discarded medications box inside of the 300 units storage room These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact the health of all the residents on the 100, 200,300 and 400 units. Unsupervised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide assist devices (3 compartment plate) for 2 (R #11 and 91) of 2 (R #11 and 91) residents reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents consuming less food resulting in weight loss. Findings for R#11: A. Record review of R #11's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] and completed by the Registered Dietitian, revealed a recommendation for a 3-compartment plate. (a plate with 3 different eating divided areas) B. On 01/09/23 at 12:22 pm during random lunch meal observation and an interview with the Dietary Manager he confirmed that R #11 should have her meals served on a 3-compartment plate as noted on her meal ticket and she was not. Findings for R #91: C. Record review of R #91's care plan dated 12/12/22 revealed, Focus: [name of R #91] is at nutritional risk r/t [related to]: dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] advanced diet texture, enteral feeds to meet needs when po [by mouth] intake is poor, wt [weight] loss,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote resident choices for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #'s 3 and 78) residents reviewed for choices by not assisting residents showers per their requested schedule and preference. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident's personal choices, poor hygiene and needs and preference not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and resides in Room (RM) #310-B. B. Record review of R #3's care plan dated 08/02/22 revealed, Focus: While in the facility, [name of R #3] states that it is important that she has the opportunity to engage in daily routines that are meaningful relative to her preferences. Interventions: It is important for me to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. C. Record review of the Unit 300 Shower Sheet dated 12/15/22 revealed R #3 should be offered a shower on Tuesday's and Friday's. D. Record review of R #3's Documentation Survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening tool had been fully completed for 1 (R #38) of 1 residents (R #38) reviewed for PASRR clearance, prior to admission. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents with physical or intellectual disabilities not receiving needed services. The findings are: A. Record review of R #38 PASRR Level 1 screening tool, completed at an area hospital,(tool needed prior to admission to facility on 06/23/21), Section C, question 1 identified R #38 as having a diagnosis or suspected mental illness. Question 2 was incomplete. Which required an answer to be able to determine if R #38 would need a referral to PASRR prior to nursing facility admission. B. On 01/18/23 at 11:19 am, during an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD), she confirmed all sections should be completed to determine if further services were needed prior to admission, and they were not completed. C. On 01/19/23 at 1:53 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing,(DON), she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that reflects a dementia diagnosis for 1 (R #37) of 1 (R #37) residents. Failure to develop and implement a resident centered care plan may result in staff's failure to understand and implement the needs and treatments of residents possibly resulting in decline in abilities and a failure to thrive. The findings are: A. Record review of R #37's face sheet revealed R #37 was admitted to facility on 09/09/22 with the diagnosis of UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITH OTHER BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE. B. Record review of R #37's care plan dated 10/23/22 revealed no care plan created that addressed R #37's dementia diagnosis. C. On 01/19/23 at 1:59 pm during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated, I don't see dementia [in R #37's care plan]. DON confirmed dementia was not care planned for R #37 and should have been.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #56) of 1 (R #56) resident reviewed for hearing assisted devices, received proper interventions and/or appointments to maintain their hearing. If the facility is not assisting residents in accessing treatment and devices to maintain their hearing, then residents are likely to lose their ability to hear compromising their quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #56's care plan dated 03/04/22 revealed, Focus: [Name of R #56] has impaired communication as evidenced by impaired hearing. Interventions: Auditory amplifier to be used as needed for communication, Involve in activities which do not depend on hearing, Provide emotional support and encouragement. B. On 01/12/23 at 2:15 pm during an interview with R #56, she stated, If they [facility] would fix the hearing aides, I'd be able to wear them. I told [Name of Dementia Program Director (DPD)] about it [R #56's hearing aides not working] and the Psychiatrist they [R #56's hearing aides] don't work. These [R #56's hearing aides] don't work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Provide dining assistance for R #91 who is triggered for significant weight loss 2. Document/track meal intake percentages for every meal for R #91 for 1 (R #91) of 1 (R#91) resident reviewed for weight loss This deficient practice is likely to result in malnutrition, dehydration, weight loss and decline in resident's well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of R #91's face sheet revealed R #91 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #91's care plan dated 12/12/22 revealed, Focus: [Name of R #91] is at nutritional risk r/t [related to]: dysphagia [difficulty swallowing], advanced diet texture, (food that is nearly regular texture) enteral feeds to meet needs when po [by mouth] intake is poor, wt [weight] loss, request for adaptive equipment at meal times. Interventions: Please administer a bolus feed of Jevity 1.5 [nutritional supplement] if meal completion is [less than] <50% [percent], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide meals that taste good, looked appetizing, and were served at the correct temperature. This failed practice has the potential to affect all 125 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 01/09/23. This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to not eat meals which could lead to weight loss. The findings are: A. On 01/09/23 at 1:29 pm during an interview with R #19, he stated, that he felt like he had lost weight because the food was not very good and it was always cold. He further stated that he had asked to get his food warmed up but, he was told that they would come back and warm it up and it was rare that they ever came back to re-warm his food. B. On 01/10/23 at 8:36 am during an interview with R #63 she stated, that the food was often cold when it was brought to her room. C. On 01/11/23 at 10:26 am during observation and an interview with R #78. R #78's breakfast tray was observed to be sitting on the bedside table. R #78 stated, that he had just…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention practices by not ensuring that aseptic technique (using practices and procedures to prevent contamination from a bacteria, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) were followed when administering wound care. This deficient practices are likely to result in contamination, infection and worsening of the wound. The findings are: A. On 01/12/23 at 8:29 am during observation of wound care RN #4 was observed doing a dressing change on R #101 wound, RN #4 was not observed changing her gloves after cleaning the wound and prior to applying a new bandage. B. On 01/20/23 at 3:59 pm during interview with DON when asked is it appropriate for a nurse not to change gloves after cleaning a wound and before placing a new bandage? DON replied No, new gloves should be used after cleaning a wound.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,170 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,170 — penalty dated 2024-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SUMMIT CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/25/2007
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/25/2007
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUMMIT CARE PARENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2013
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
HICKS, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2025
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
NOYA, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 9%Other / private 37%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$407per resident / day
operating cost
$12,375per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$431per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325069. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next