Canyon Transitional Rehabilitation Center, LLC
10101 Lagrima De Oro Road NE, Albuquerque, NM 87111 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 74 certified beds · (505) 298-1231 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2023
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 11.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.9% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.8% | 2.0% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.5% | 11.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.6% | 14.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 5.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.2% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 86.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.2% | 22.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 15.7% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.2%CMS range 59.3–73.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.0–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 88.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.3%CMS range 2.8–9.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 67.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to safeguard protected health information (PHI) for 4 (R #10, R #11, R #12, and R #13) of 4 (R #10, R #11, R #12, and R #13) residents. If the resident's clinical information is not sufficiently safe guarded, resident's PHI is likely to be viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors, and staff. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's protecting patient/resident privacy policy, provided on 07/01/26, revealed all staff have a responsibility to protect the privacy of patients and residents. The policy states confidential or protected health information on desks or other publicly accessible areas must be secured by using designated work areas or locked storage containers, cabinets, or desks. The policy also states staff must lock the computer screen when stepping away to prevent unauthorized individuals from viewing patient or resident information. B. On 07/01/26 at 1:10 pm, during an observation of the 300 hall, a laptop computer left on an unattended medication cart was open and displaying R #10's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff properly stored and secured medications for all residents on the 300 hall when the hall medication cart (a mobile storage unit equipped with drawers and locking mechanisms to hold medications) was not secured and was left unattended. If the facility fails to secure medication carts, residents are likely to experience unauthorized access to medications, potentially resulting in injury or illness.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's medication storage policy, revised January 2026, revealed the medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. The policy states medication rooms, cabinets, and medication supplies must remain locked when not in use or when not attended by authorized personnel. B. On 07/01/26 at 1:15 pm, during an observation of the 300 Hall, an unlocked medication cart was positioned in the hallway without staff present, and the cart remained unattended and accessible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, served, handled, and monitored under sanitary conditions when staff failed to: Complete required daily logs of the sanitizer bucket, three compartment sink, and the dish machine in the kitchen.Complete daily refrigerator and freezer temperature logs in the nourishment room. Properly seal and protect open food items to prevent air exposure inside the large refrigerator located in the kitchen. Properly store raw meat inside the large refrigerator located in the kitchen. Wear gloves and avoid bare hand contact with ready-to-eat food while obtaining food temperaturesThese deficient practices are likely to affect all 68 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 02/23/26 and is likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: Incomplete Logs: A. Record review of the facility's Sanitizer Bucket Log (used to document that sanitizing solutions in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of at least 12 hours per year for 4 (CNAs #12, #13, #16 and #17) of 7 (CNAs #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, and #17) CNAs randomly reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in CNA's not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) staffing and training log indicated the following: CNA #12 was hired on 03/24/25. CNA #12 only completed 7 hours 52 minutes of in-service training and did not complete at least 12 hours of required in-service training.CNA #13 was hired on 09/30/24. CNA #13 only completed 4 hours 11 minutes of in-service training and did not complete at least 12 hours of required in-service training.CNA #16 was hired on 04/22/15. CNA #16 only completed 4 hours 44 minutes of in-service training and did not complete at least 12 hours of required in-service training.CNA #17 was hired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop an accurate comprehensive, person-centered care plan for 1 (R #30) of 2 (R #1 and #30) residents reviewed for care planning, when facility staff failed to initiate a care plan to reflect R #30's behavioral health needs, including Suicidal Ideation (SI; thoughts, preoccupations, or plans about ending one's own life, ranging from fleeting considerations to detailed planning). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents being at risk for unmet needs, a decreased quality of life, and avoidable decline in physical and psychosocial well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of R #30's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/18/26. B. Record review of R #30's nursing progress notes revealed the following: Dated 01/19/26 at 11:25 am: R #30 made a comment about hurting herself to staff. Nurse and supervisor followed up with resident and R #30 denied active suicidal ideation, stating she was frustrated when she said that she would hurt herself. R #30 further stated she previously lived…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 (R #70) of 1 (R #70) resident reviewed for feeding tube (medical device to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth) use. If the facility is not updating the care plan to reflect the residents' current care areas and treatment, then the facility may not be providing the appropriate care and treatment to meet the residents' needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #70's face sheet revealed R #70 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing food or liquid),Aphasia (disorder that results from damage, usually from a stroke or traumatic brain injury to areas of the brain that are responsible for language),Malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients your body gets). B. Record review of R #70's nursing progress notes dated 02/04/26 revealed the following: R #70 was sent to the hospital due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 (R #84) of 1 (R #84) resident reviewed, when:The facility administered Tylenol (acetaminophen; pain medication) without a manufacturer's expiration date or date of opening on bottle. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving full benefit from medications, possible prolonged treatment period, or unwanted effects. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 8:39 AM, during an observation of R #84's medication administration, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 prepared R #84's Tylenol for administration. There was no observed expiration or opening date printed on the Tylenol bottle or label. CMA #1 administered Tylenol to R #84. B. On [DATE] at 8:40 AM, during an interview, CMA #1 stated over the counter medications (OTC; medications sold to individuals without a prescription) like Tylenol, can be used for 30 days after opening. CMA #1 stated all bottles should have a manufacturers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of infectious agents and communicable diseases for 2 (R #4, and R #43) of 2 (R #4, and R #43) residents, when the facility: Failed to prevent a urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube which drains urine from the bladder) bag and tubing from touching the floor for R #4. Placed an oxygen humidification container (device used to add moisture to dry oxygen gas before it is delivered to a patient) on the floor of R #43's room. These deficient practices have the potential to expose staff and other residents to infectious diseases. The findings are: R #4: A. Record review of the facility's Catheter Care Procedure (steps to maintain the catheter and drainage system), last revised on 01/15/26, revealed staff were required to secure catheter tubing to keep the drainage bag below the level of the patient's bladder and off the floor. B. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to: - Store opened food with labels and dates to prevent cross contamination and outdated usage, - Store meat in a manner to prevent leakage and contamination of other food items, These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and foodborne illness which could affect all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The findings are: A. On 11/25/24 at 7:53 am, observation during a walk-through of the kitchen refrigerator revealed the following: that multiple items were either not dated or were past the date to be served and should have been thrown out. - Unidentified sandwiches did not have a label on them. - Mashed potatoes with a date of 11/19/24 and use by 11/24/24. - Egg salad with unclear dates written on the label. - Sliced cheese was partially wrapped and was hard and discolored. - Container of deli ham not sealed. - A large container of leftovers was not labeled and dated. - Ham stored in a cardboard box sat on a shelf above a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician or the nurse practitioner for 2 (R #29 and #132) of 2 (R #29 and #132) residents for: 1. R #29 who had significant amount of pain. 2. R #132 who did not receive several doses of his intravenous (IV; a tube inserted into a blood vessel and used to administer medications, fluids, or nutrition into the bloodstream) antibiotic. If the facility is not notifying the physician or nurse practitioner of changes in a residents medical condition then the resident will not receive prompt medical care and could cause a delay in treatment, unnecessary pain, and could create more serious health complications. The findings are: Resident #29 A. On 11/25/24 at 11:14 am, during an observation and interview of R #29, she rubbed her hand and cried. R #29 stated she was in a lot of pain. She stated staff gave her Tylenol (pain medication) a little bit ago, but it did not help. She stated her pain level was an 11 (the pain scale indicates pain based on 1 being the lowest and 10 being highest.) B. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for all 21 residents who lived on the 400 hall. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not feeling comfortable, which could affect their psychological well-being. The findings are: A. On 11/25/24 at 8:00 a.m., observation during the initial tour of the building revealed the 400 hall had a strong odor of urine and feces throughout. B. On 11/27/24 at 11:06 a.m., during an interview, R #266 stated she had a bedside commode. She stated she did not always put the lid down, because she frequently needed to use the bathroom. She stated she missed the bedside commode in the past while she tried to open the lid. C. On 11/237/24 at 11:06 a.m., it was observed that R#266 bedside commode sat next to the resident's bed, the lid was up, and urine was in the commode. D. On 11/27/24 at 11:15 a.m., during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, she stated R #266 did not keep the lid on her bedside commode down after she used it, which made the 400-hallway smell of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care that met professional standards for 1 (R #60) of 3 (R #23, #60 and #16) residents when the facility failed to maintain and care for R #60's gastrostomy tube (g-tube; a tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach and used to provide fluids, nourishment and medications.) This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving proper nutritional needs and also places residents at risk for complications and infections that may affect their quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's policy, Enteral Management, dated 03/01/22, revealed staff to provide safe and effective management of enteral tubes. B. Record review of the facility's policy, Enteral Tubes Medication Administration, dated 03/01/22, revealed guidelines for managing complications. Staff directed to do the following: 1. Check first to see the tube was not kinked. 2. If the feeding tube became clogged, then interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) for 7 residents (R #25, #32, #52, #130, #131, #132, and #317) of 11 residents (R #3, #16, #25, #31, #32, #45, #52, #130, #131, #132, and #317) reviewed during medication administration. Staff administered 80 medications with 39 errors, which resulted in a medication error rate of 48.75 %. If medications are administered in error, residents are likely to experience less than optimal results from their medication regimen. The findings are: R #25 A. Record review of R #25's physician orders, dated 12/2/24, revealed the following: - Potassium oral tablet (treats hypokalemia; a condition where the level of potassium in blood is lower than normal), 20 milliequivalents (meq). Give one tablet by mouth for hypokalemia at 8:00 am. - Sotalol oral tablet (manages blood pressure), 80 milligrams (mg). Give one tablet by mouth for high blood pressure at 8:00 am. - Sertraline oral tablet (treats depression; a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to keep a resident free from significant medication errors for 1 (R #132) of 1 (R #132) residents when they failed to administer R #132's vancomycin (an antibiotic medication) intravenous (IV; a tube that is inserted into a blood vessel and used to administer medications, fluids, or nutrition into the bloodstream) medication in a timely manner as per the physician's order. This deficient practice is likely to cause R #132 to have adverse drug effects including but not limited to lowering the effectiveness of the antibiotic treatment and potentially contributes to antimicrobial resistance (when microorganisms, like bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, change and are no longer affected by the drugs used to treat them). The findings are: A. Record review of R #132's face sheet, dated 11/12/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to: - Osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumber region…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medication refrigerators did not contain medications that belonged to discharged residents. 2. Ensure nurses and CMAs dated opened insulin (a medication prescribed to help the body turn food into energy and manages blood sugar levels) vials and discarded them within 28 days of opening. 3. Ensure medication carts did not contain medications that belonged to discharged residents. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents receiving medications that are less effective or expired for all 70 residents who reside in the facility, as identified on the census list provided by the facility Administrator on 11/25/24. The findings for the medication refrigerator: A. On 11/26/24 at 10:50 am, during observation of medication refrigerator located inside the medication room, revealed the following: 1. Lispro 10 milliliter multiple-dose vial insulin (a short-acting insulin) vial was open and did not have an opening date. The insulin vial belonged to R #8. 2. Vancomycin (an antibiotic medication)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure advance directives (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and life saving care) were complete for 1 (R #45) of 1 (R #45) resident reviewed for advance directives when staff failed to ensure the resident signed the advance directive. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents receiving unwanted or unplanned treatment during a medical emergency. The findings are: A. Record review of R #45 electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R #45 elected a code status of do not resuscitate [DNR; a medical order that instructs healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a patient's heart stops beating or breathing stops.] B. Record review of R #45's Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST; an advance directive) form, dated [DATE], revealed the resident did not sign it. C. On [DATE] at 3:48 PM during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated R #45's MOST form should be signed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed the comprehensive care plans for 2 (R #23 and R #166) of 2 (R #23 and R #166) residents reviewed for care plans, when staff failed to: 1. Complete care plans for R #23 for the following areas: Activities of daily living (ADL; basic self-care tasks) care, psychotropic medications (medications that affect behavior, mood, thoughts and perception), and respiratory complications; and 2. Complete care plans for R #166 for the following areas: ADL care, cardiovascular (heart) symptoms or complications, oral health, diabetes (high blood sugar levels), anemia (not having enough healthy red blood cells), and anticoagulant (medication that thins the blood) medication use. This failure has the potential to adversely affect staff's ability to implement preventative measures for the residents' health and well-being. The findings are: Resident #23 A. Record review of face sheet for R #23 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24 and included the following diagnoses: - Muscle weakness; - Lack of coordination; -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide adequate and timely pain relief for 1 (R #29) of 2 (R #29 and #132) residents reviewed for pain. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #29 to be in significant pain. The findings are: Resident #29 A. On 11/25/24 at 11:14 am, during an observation and interview of R #29, she rubbed her hand and cried. R #29 stated she was in a lot of pain. She stated staff gave her Tylenol a little bit ago, but it did not help. She asked the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 to ask the nurse to bring her the medication for her nerve pain, and the CNA stated he would tell the nurse. R #29 stated that sometimes the Tylenol worked and sometimes it did not. She stated her pain level was an 11. B. Record review of the physicians orders for R #29 indicated an order for Tylenol extra strength, oral tablet 500 milligrams (mg). Give two tablets by mouth every eight hours as needed for generalized pain. C. Record review of the medical record for R #29 indicated staff documented the resident's pain level to be a 10 (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention practices when a staff did not perform hand hygiene prior to and after handling medications for 1 (R #132) of 1 (R #132), This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infectious agents (viruses and bacteria) between the 23 residents in 100 hall. The findings are: A. On 11/25/24 at 9:53 am, during an observation of Nurse #1, she did not perform hand hygiene (a general term that applies to hand washing, antiseptic handwash, and alcohol-based hand rub) prior to administering medications to R #132. B. On 11/25/24 at 9:55 am, during an interview with Nurse #1, she stated she should have performed hand hygiene prior to and after administering medications to R #132.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean and homelike for 2 (R #7, R #8) of 2 (R #7, R #8) residents reviewed for homelike environment. This failure had the potential to affect all 69 residents identified on the resident census provided by the administrator on 10/30/31. If the facility fails to maintain resident rooms in a safe and homelike environment then residents are likely to feel uncomfortable and could exacerbate (make worse) health issues. The findings are: A. On 10/30/23 at 1:38 pm, during an interview, Family Member (FM) #1 expressed concerns about the the physical environment of R #7's room. FM #1 stated the temperature in R #7's room was too high, and R #7 was completely soaked in sweat. She stated R #7 asked her to turn down the thermostat, but that did not seem to affect the temperature. FM #1 also stated the second concern was a problem with the sink. There was an odor, and it appeared that sewage was backing up. Things were not draining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained accurate medical records for 1 (R # 3) of 7 (R # 1, R # 2, R # 3, R #4, R #5, R #6, and R #7) reviewed for charted pain medications in the electronic medication administration record (EMAR). This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving more narcotic [a drug that in moderate doses dulls the senses, relieves pain, and induces profound sleep, but in excessive (more than necessary) doses causes coma (a deep state of not being awake or aware of things around you), convulsions (a medical condition in which muscles contract and relax rapidly and repeatedly resulting in uncontrolled shaking), or seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness)]. The findings are: A. Record review of R # 3's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #3's Physician orders revealed: 1. Oxycodone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-21 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman (long term care advocate for residents) in writing with the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital for 1 (R #61) of 1 (R #61) residents. This deficient practice is likely to cause the resident the inability to make informed decisions about the resident's care and not have access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights. The findings are: A. Record review of R #61's face sheet, dated 08/12/23, revealed an initial admission date of 07/12/23 and included the following diagnoses: - Metabolic Encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in the brain. Caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood); - Hypo-osmolality (condition where the levels of electrolytes, proteins, and nutrients in the blood are lower than normal); - Weakness; - Difficulty walking; - Dysphagia, Oral phase (swallowing difficulties); - Cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language); - Unspecified Asthma (condition in which your airways narrow and swell and may produce extra…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespreadEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards for 3 (R #18, R #63, and R #135) of 3 (R #18, R #63 and R #135) by: 1. Staff did not follow physician orders (R #135), 2. Staff did not document urine output for a resident with severe chronic kidney disease (R #63); 3. Staff did not provide a swallow evaluation and treatment services for a resident with swallowing difficulties/dysphagia (R #18) when indicated. These deficient practices may cause aspiration of a liquid causing the resident to choke if staff do not follow physicians' orders, progressing kidney failure could be occur without staff or the physician being aware if resident urinary outputs are not documented, and choking and aspiration if swallowing difficulties are not screened and treated. The findings are: R #135 A. Record Review of R #135 diet order, dated 08/10/23, read, Consistent carbohydrate (CCD) diet, dysphagia advanced texture, thick liquids-nectar consistency. B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions by: 1. Not ensuring all food items of residents' plated meals were covered while being transported from the the meal cart in the hallway into residents' rooms for in-room dining. 2. Not using proper handling techniques when handling cups and glasses when drinks were distributed to residents dining in their rooms. 3. Gloves not being removed and hands not being sanitized by staff. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 70 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 08/14/23 and could likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 08/14/23 at 12:06 pm, during an observation of the lunch meal in the dining room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 was observered adjusting R #29's wheelchair lock at his table. After adjusting the locks, CNA #4 continued to pour juice and water from pitchers for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide infection control practices by not: 1. Performing hand hygiene between residents 2. Changing out gloves between direct care 3. Not Donning (applying personal protective equipment) and Doffing (taking off PPE) between residents on isolation 4. Cleaning the glucometer (an instrument used to measure sugar in the blood) after resident use. These deficient practices could likely result in the spread of infectious agents (viruses and bacteria) between the residents and/or staff. The findings are: Hand Hygiene: A. Record review of the facility's policy control titled, Hand hygiene, revealed Adherence to hand hygiene practices is maintained by all center personnel. Purpose: To improve hand hygiene and reduce the transmission of pathogenic microorganisms (bacterium, virus, or other microorganisms). Process: 1. Perform hand hygiene: 1.1 Before patient/resident care; 1.4 After patient care; 1.5 After contact with the patient's environment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify and give written notification to residents for 2 (R #7 and R #48) of 2 (R #7 and R #48) residents reviewed for notification of room change. This deficient practice could likely result in a resident being unprepared for the room change and may lead to feelings of helplessness, anxiety, and frustration. The findings are: R #7 A. On 08/15/23 at 12:30 PM, during an interview, R #7 stated, I didn't know they (the facility) can keep changing my rooms. I was surprised when I came over here (to his current room), and they did not tell me before (moving him and his belongings). R #7 stated he came back from lunch one day and all his things were not in his room. His things had been moved to his current room. R #7 stated he was not made aware that he would be changing rooms, prior to his belongings being moved by the facility. B. On 08/21/23 at 12:29 PM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated residents should be informed prior to being moved to another room, and it should be documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent staff to resident exploitation by staff members using a resident's bank debit card to make unauthorized (without the account holders permission) money withdrawal or purchases for 2 (R #50 and #134) of 3 ( R #50, 134 and 136) residents looked at for abuse/neglect. This deficient practice caused undue stress and anxiety for the residents when it was discovered that they had money missing. The findings are: A. Record review of a complaint received on 07/10/23, with allegations of misappropriation (wrongful use of another's belongings, money, etc.) of property, revealed the alleged Perpetrator (a person who commits an illegal or harmful act) was the Business Office Manager Assistant (BOMA) of (name of facility), and she had stolen up to $9000 from the alleged victim R #50. An assignment by the State of NM complaints team was made, and the complaint was investigated along with a re-certification survey starting on 08/14/23. B. On 08/14/23 at 11:30 am, during an interview, R #50 stated she did remember something about her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a safe environment free of hazards for 4 (R #31, 29, 121, and 164) of 4 (R #31, 29, 121, and 164) residents reviewed for accident hazards due to: 1. A floor mat that was on the floor in a residents room while the resident wasn't in bed R #164, 2. A wheelchair weight machine not being folded and in it's locked position taking up a large portion of the hallway; 3. By not providing one resident with her helmet when she was out of bed for R #121. These deficient practices could likely cause residents to trip and fall causing bruising, scratches, lacerations (a cut on the skin thought to be a wound) or even broken bones and had the potential to cause R #121 to suffer severe brain damage if she wasn't wearing her helmet and fell, hitting her head where she currently has a soft spot because a portion of her skull was removed. The findings are: R #31 A. On 08/14/23 at 3:56 pm, an observation was made of the wheelchair weight machine being in the down position; meaning a wheelchair could be rolled onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 4 (R #11, R # 39, R #166, and R #168) of 4 (R #11, R # 39, R #166, and R #168) residents reviewed for respiratory care by: 1. Not properly dating and monitoring the oxygen delivery tubing for R #166, R #11, and R #39; and dating the humidifier bottle (bottle of water that provides water to the oxygen to prevent the air from being too dry) for R #168 and R #166. These deficient practices could lead to hypoxia (decreased oxygen to the body) by not supplying enough oxygen and could lead to possible respiratory infections by the oxygen tubing becoming clogged, filled with water condensation, or becoming dirty leading to the reduced flow of oxygen. R #168 A. On 08/15/23 at 10:37 AM, during an observation, R #168 was observed to be taking oxygen. No date was observed on the humidifier bottle (bottle of water that provides water to the oxygen to prevent the air from being too dry). B. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis (clinical purification of blood as substitute for normal kidney functioning) facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 (R #134) of 1 (R #134) resident reviewed for dialysis. If the facility is unaware of residents status, current condition, or any barriers or complications, then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate monitoring and care they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #134's face sheet indicated that he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the hospital medical records dated 08/04/23 indicated that R #134 was placed permanently on dialysis. C. Record review of the physician orders indicated that R #134 Dialysis days were: (M/W/F) Monday, Wednesday and Friday Pick up: 1100 Transport to: [name of company] D. Record review of the Medical Records Documents Section indicated that there was one dialysis communication form in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain records of controlled substances (drugs that are subject to strict government control because they may cause addiction) on each medication cart. This deficient practice could case the likelihood of controlled substances being diverted (a medical and legal concept including the transfer of any illegal prescribed controlled substances from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use) and expired medication was found in the medication storage room. The findings are: Narcotic (controlled substance) Logbook: A. On 08/14/23 at 11:35 am during an observation of the 400-medication cart Narcotic book (This is a book used to manually track inventories of prescription medications. This tracks resident prescription intake. It will record when the facility receives the medication for each schedule 2 controlled substance received from the pharmacy, and shift pages to count at the beginning and end of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory testing for 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6) residents reviewed for laboratory services. If the facility fails to obtain labs that have been ordered, this could likely cause a delay in services related to her anticoagulant therapy, (commonly known as blood thinners) causing harm to the resident. The findings are: A. Record review R #6's Physicians order dated 01/23/23 revealed she was on Enoxaparin Sodium Injection (is an anticoagulant that helps prevent the formation of blood clots) 40 milligram (MG) two times a day, everyday for DVT (deep vein thrombosis, blood clots in the legs) with no stop date. B. Record review of R #6's pharmacy recommendations revealed she (R #6) had accepted recommendations from her physician on 05/18/23 for the following: Monitor a CBC (Complete blood count is a blood test. It's used to look at overall health and find a wide range of conditions, including anemia, infection and leukemia.) and BMP (basic metabolic panel is a test that measures eight different substances in your blood) at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect, for 1 (R #36) of 1 (R #36) resident reviewed, by attempting to restrict R #36's interactions with another resident (R #50) under threat of discharge from facility. This deficient practice could likely result in feelings of living in a hostile environment and feelings of helplessness and fear. The findings are: A. On 08/21/23 at 9:43 am, during an interview R #36 stated he was approached by a previous resident about R #50's problems with her bank account. He stated he was given permission by R #50 to talk to her bank about her account. He stated R #50 was looking for her checks and debit card, which were physically missing from her possession. He stated the representative from R #50's bank later reached out to him to ask if R #50 was still living at the facility. The representative from R #50's bank called R #36, because the bank representative wanted to talk to R #50 about money missing from her account. The bank represented informed R #36 the money missing was from ATM withdrawals. R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were aware of and/or understood the risks and benefits of medication they were receiving for 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) residents by not informing residents of why a medication was being prescribed and administered and what diagnosis/condition it was treating. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling anxious and potentially receiving unnecessary treatment/medication. The findings are: A. Record review of Physicians Orders, dated 08/03/23, for R #11 revealed: - Risperidone (used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) oral tablet, 1 milligram (mg), give 1 tablet at bedtime every day for delusional disorder (is a type of serious mental illness. One can't tell what's real from what is imagined); - Quetipine Fumarate [a medication used for schizophrenia (false beliefs, seeing or hearing things that don't exist, unusual physical behavior, and disorganized thinking and speech), acute manic episodes, and adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder] oral tablet 50 mg, give 1 tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person care plan for 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6) residents. Failure to develop and implement a person-centered care plan could likely result in staff's failure to understand the needs and implement the appropriate treatments for residents; possibly resulting in decline in abilities and failure to thrive. The findings are: A. Record review of Physician's orders, dated 01/24/23, states, Oxygen at 1-6 liters per minute via nasal cannula (tubing placed in the nose) continuously. B. Record review of care plan, dated 01/24/23 and last revised on 07/12/23, revealed the care plan did not address R #6's oxygen use. C. On 08/21/23 at 11:59 am, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated oxygen use should be care planned.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is cited at Past Non-compliance Based on record review and interview the facility failed to initiate a change in condition prompting the physician to be notified for 1 (R #63) of 5 (R # 29, 34, 47, 63 and 120) residents looked at for change in condition. This deficient practice could likely contribute to residents suffering a decline in their health, hospitalization, and death if a change in condition is not identified timely. The findings are: While on survey the facility provided sufficient evidence that the facility corrected the non-compliance and was in substantial compliance at the time of the survey on 08/14/23. On 06/02/23 the facility identified deficient practice, on 06/05/23 the facility began auditing, and initiated a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) around the facility failing to identify a change in condition (CIC). R #63 passed away on 06/02/23 and there was evidence of ongoing monitoring conducted on a monthly basis and reviewed during the monthly Quality Assessment Performance Improvement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a residents feeding tube was properly taken care of for 1 (R #121) of 1 (R #121) reviewed for feeding tubes. This deficient practice could likely cause infection at the site of the feeding tube if there are no physician orders to continue to clean the area around the feeding tube; and the order to remove the feeding tube had not been followed through with. The findings are: A. On 08/15/23 at 9:22 am, during an interview with Family Member, she stated that her mother's (R#121) feeding tube is not always cleaned. She stated that she is not currently using the feeding tube and it is supposed to be removed. It hasn't been removed yet and it's not getting cleaned as often as it should. B. Record review of the care plan updated on 07/31/23 indicated to continue cleaning peg tube (feeding tube) until removed. C. Record review of the physician orders indicated that on 08/03/23 to remove PEG tube and apply compression dressing. D. Record review of the progress notes dated 08/03/23 at 15:34 (3:34 pm) faxed to [name of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared in a form that met a resident's required textured diet (an appropriate consistency of food that can be easily chewed and swallowed) for 1 (R #18) of 1 (R #18) resident observed during random observation. This deficient practice could likely result in a choking incident. The findings are: A. On 08/14/23 at 1:02 pm, during an observation and interview, R #18 received her lunch meal. She stated I can't eat that. I need it shredded. I'm missing part of my dentures and can't chew that good . It was observed that she had a breaded chicken fillet patty on a roll. B. Record review of R #18's meal ticket for 08/14/23 lunch meal, revealed the following: R #18 is on a regular (one that does not include any dietary restrictions)/liberalized (a diet that takes into account not only the person's state of health, physician's orders, and treatments, but also the individual's food preferences) with a dysphagia advanced texture (dysphagia advanced diet includes food that is nearly regular textures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have complete and up to date resident records for 1 (R #62) of 1 (R #62) resident looked at for discharge. This deficient practice could cause confusion if minimal documentation is found in the chart for a resident who left Against Medical Advice (AMA). The findings are: A. Record review of medical record indicated that R #62 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/24/23. B. Record review of the nursing progress notes dated 06/24/23 at 11:34 am indicated that R #62 left Against Medical Advice (AMA) .with meds this morning, all personal items taken by resident. Left facility at approx. 1115H (11:15 am) with sister, denied any pain or discomfort. C. On 08/21/23 at 2:44 pm, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, he stated that he does remember her (R #62) and that he did discharge her that day 06/24/23. He stated that he doesn't know why she discharged that day but he doesn't remember her being angry. He thinks she was just ready…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.4 | +2.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 5 of 5 | 2.3 | +2.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMMIT CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/25/2007 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/25/2007 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUMMIT CARE PARENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2013 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MCKEE, ERIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/10/2025 |
| ROTHMAN, EMILY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/10/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325054. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.