The Rehabilitation Center of Albuquerque
5900 Forest Hills Drive NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (505) 822-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,909 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.4% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 0.9% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 2.0% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.5% | 11.7% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.7% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.7% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.7% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 86.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.7% | 22.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 15.7% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.4%CMS range 54.8–74.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.1%CMS range 6.1–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.0–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify resident Power of Attorney (POA; legal authorization for a designated person to make decisions about another person's property, finances, or medical care)/emergency contacts and facility providers (Physicians and Nurse Practitioners) of when a resident had a change in condition (a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains) for 2 (R #15 and R #25) of 4 (R #15, #16, #17 and #25) residents reviewed, when staff failed to: Notify R #15's emergency contacts regarding illness, falls, and abnormal vital signs (body temperature, pulse rate, rate of breathing, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure).Notify a provider regarding R #25's unresponsive state. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #15 not receiving necessary assistance and contributed to the deterioration of R #25's condition and cardiac arrest. The findings are:R #15: A. Record review of R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Advance Directives (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) were honored for 1 (R #101) of 1 (R #101) residents when staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; an emergency procedure that combines chest compression with artificial ventilation) to R #101 when the resident had a documented Do Not Resuscitate (DNR; lifesaving measures are not desired) Advanced Directive on file at the facility. If staff do not follow a resident's Advanced Directives, then the resident may feel undignified and as if they do not have control over her own choices.The findings are: A. Record review of R #101's face sheet revealed an admission date of [DATE]. B. Record review of R #101's New Mexico Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST; a legal document which outlines the care the resident wants when they become incapacitated and unable to speak for themselves) form, dated [DATE] and signed by R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that six of six residents (Resident (R)23, R83, R50 , R65, R79 and R90 ) reviewed for tracheostomy (trach) care out of a total sample of 33 residents had the necessary supplies at the bedside in the event of a life-threatening emergency, and failed to train staff on appropriate emergency tracheostomy care in the event that a resident's airway was compromised, which placed residents with a tracheostomy at increased likelihood of serious harm or death. On 12/13/22 at 2:32 PM, the Administrator, the Regional Nurse, and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F695-K: Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 12/12/22 when the survey team identified the concerns related to the facility without emergency tracheostomy supplies and staff training for emergency preparedness for maintaining airways if trachs were dislodged from the airway for R23, R83, R50, R65,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2022-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed adequate infection control measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 among 36 of 113 facility residents. A COVID-19 outbreak began on 11/22/22 with 36 cases of facility-acquired infections from 11/22/22 to 12/12/22. All 36 residents (Resident (R) 79, R26, R31, R43, R61, R1, R64, R34, R49, R3, R6, R80, R9, R47, R19, R16, R32, R18, R2, R14, R73, R5, R106, R29, R111, R11, R25, R88, R74, R63, R13, R366, R109, R78, R108, and R107) had co-morbid diagnoses (the presence of more than one disorder in the same person), which placed them at risk of severe illness or death, 15 of the 36 residents experienced adverse COVID-19 symptoms (difficulty breathing and/or chest pain pressure) (R26, R31, R61, R1, R64, R34, R3, R18, R14, R74, R63, R366, R78, R108, and R107), and three (R1, R49, and R366) of the 36 residents were hospitalized due to COVID-19 complications. Findings include: A. Spread of COVID-19 Infection in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY PAST NOT COMPLIANCE Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for 1 (R #68) of 3 (R #68, R #7, and R #49) residents, when they failed to immediately notify R #68's physician of the resident's missed seizure (sudden, uncontrolled body movements and changes in behavior that occur because of abnormal electrical activity in the brain) medications. This deficient practice result in the resident's physician being unaware of resident's current condition, resulting in delayed treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #68's face sheet showed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Traumatic brain injury (TBI; injury to the brain caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), - Seizures (involuntary shaking of the body), - Persistent vegetative state (chronic disorder in which an individual with severe brain damage appears to be awake but shows no evidence of awareness of their surroundings), - Tracheostomy [a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY PAST NOT COMPLIANCE Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep a resident free from significant medication errors for 1 (R #68) of 3 (R #68, R #79, and R #7) residents randomly sampled, when they failed to administer R #68's levetiracetam (an anti-seizure medication) on the evening of 12/14/2023 and morning and evening of 12/15/2023 as per physician's order. This deficient practice resulted in R #68 having adverse side effects such as breakthrough seizures (occur when a person has a seizure after controlling their condition with medication for at least 12 months.) The findings are: A. Record review of R #68's face sheet showed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Traumatic brain injury (TBI; injury to the brain caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), - Seizures (involuntary shaking of the body), - Persistent vegetative state (chronic disorder in which an individual with severe brain damage appears to be awake but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) for 4 (R #'s 5, 6, 7, and 8) of 4 (R #'s 5, 6, 7, and 8) residents reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents, when staff failed to: Provide baths/showers per the facility bathing schedule. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: R #5: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed an admission date of 04/01/25 and included the following diagnoses:Need for assistance with personal care. Muscle weakness. History of falling. B. Record review of the facility's shower schedule revealed R #5's scheduled shower days are Tuesday and Friday. C. Record review of R #5's care plan, dated 02/11/26, revealed R #5 required staff assistance with ADL care due to R #5 experiencing pain and repeated falls. D. Record review of R #5's documentation survey report (ADL tracking form), dated 03/01/26 through 03/31/26, revealed R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staff to meet the needs of all 89 residents residing in the facility, when:The facility failed to offer baths or showers to residents as scheduled. The facility staff used R #4's family member to assist with a transfer using a Hoyer lift (equipment used to move residents who have limited mobility) when staff were not available. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact resident safety, comfort, and impede processes such as timely showers and appropriate assistance with care. The findings are:Baths/Showers: A. Refer to F0677 for related findings. B. On 05/13/26 at 4:56 pm, during an interview, R #5 stated the facility is so short staffed that staff often do not offer or provide him with at least two baths or showers per week. R #5 stated nursing staff tell him they do not have enough staff to complete his showers consistently. C. On 05/13/26 at 5:12 pm, during an interview, R #6 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident property was protected from misappropriation (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent) for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds and belongings, when: R #3's purse, wallet, and reading glasses went missing in an area where a facility housekeeper was working, and only R #3's purse was eventually returned to her.If the facility fails to ensure resident property is protected from misappropriation, then residents are at risk for unauthorized use of personal funds, financial exploitation, and potential financial loss. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #3's follow-up incident report, dated 04/29/26, revealed that on 04/27/26, R #3 reported her pink purse missing, and staff later found it in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #'s 1, 2, and 3) residents reviewed, when staff failed to: Conduct a quarterly care plan meeting as required for R #1 in accordance with their admission date and Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff).This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plan meetings are not completed as required. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's MDS page located in the electronic health record (EHR), revealed the following MDS completion dates: Dated 10/15/25, comprehensive MDS completed and submitted. Dated 01/08/26, quarterly MDS completed and submitted. Dated 04/07/26, discharge MDS completed and submitted. C. Record review of R #1's care plan meeting progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Cross-Reference with F0602. Based on record review and interviews, it was determined the facility was not administered in a manner that ensured the effective and efficient use of resources to attain or maintain each resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being, when:The facility administration failed to prevent unauthorized individuals, who were not contracted or directly hired by the facility, from working in the facility near residents.This deficient practice is likely to affect the 89 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 05/13/26. If the facility is unaware of an individuals' status when they enter the facility and are near residents, residents' safety and well being are placed at risk. The finds are: A. Record review of R #3's facility follow-up incident report, dated 04/29/26, revealed when the facility was reviewing R #3's missing item grievance, the night nurse manager reported that the housekeeper in question had two men accompanying her, which the nurse manager found unusual. The nurse manager stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 2 (R #3 and #17) of 2 (R #3 and #17) residents reviewed when staff failed to: Ensure oxygen (O2) was administered per physician orders for R #3. Follow physician orders to obtain STAT (immediately, without delay) laboratory values (numerical measurements from blood, urine, or other bodily fluids that indicate your body's health status, organ function, and potential disease states) and a STAT X-ray (a photographic or digital image of the internal composition of something, especially a part of the body, produced by X-rays being passed through it and being absorbed to different degrees by different materials) for R #17. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are:R #3: A. Record review of facility's O2 Concentrator (a medical device designed to deliver supplemental oxygen to individuals with low blood oxygen levels due to various health conditions)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing of a surgical wound (a cut or incision in the skin that is usually made by a scalpel during surgery) for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed when the facility failed to: Provide surgical wound care per physician orders for R #1. If wound care is not being provided as ordered by a physician, then residents are likely at risk of wound deterioration, infection, delayed healing, and other complications.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's wound management policy, dated 09/15/25, revealed the following: Provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health and promote healing, Review pre-admission information to prepare for residents' skin/wound needs prior to admission/re-admission, For surgical wounds follow specific orders,Preform daily monitoring of wounds or dressing for presence of complications or declines, Monitor status of dressing, the tissue surrounding the dressing, and signs of decline in wound status. B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff properly stored and secured medications and medical supplies for all residents residing on the 300 unit when: The unit treatment cart (a movable piece of equipment used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense treatment supplies and tools) was not secured and left unattended. The unit medication cart (a mobile storage unit equipped with drawers and locking mechanisms to hold medications) was not secured and left unattended. If the facility fails to secure medication and treatment carts, then residents are likely to experience unauthorized access to medications and medical supplies, potentially resulting in injury or illness. The findings are: A. On 03/17/26 at 2:39 PM, during an observation of the 300 unit, the wound care treatment cart was unlocked and opened. Further observations revealed the cart had wound care supplies, tweezers, topical creams (a medication applied directly to the skin to treat a specific area), and scissors available. The facility nursing staff was not present in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete for 2 (R #'s 1 and 25) of 2 (R #'s 1 and 25) residents reviewed when the facility: Documented R #1's surgical wound care treatment in R #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) as completed, when the wound care treatment was not completed per physician orders.Failed to document R #25's vital signs (clinical measurements, specifically pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure, that indicate the state of a patient's essential body functions) in R #25's EHR after R #25 experienced a change in condition (CIC; any noticeable deviation from a person's normal health baseline, whether it is an improvement or a decline in physical, functional, or mental state).This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not having the information they need to provide competent, comprehensive care and services to residents. The findings are: R #1: A. Refer to F0686 for related findings. B. Record review of R #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated 12/17/25 through 12/23/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) for 1 (R #17) of 1 (R #17) residents reviewed for baseline care plans, when: R #17's baseline care plan was incomplete and inaccurate due to the baseline care plan failing to include multiple diagnoses with interventions for R #17. If the facility fails to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for residents, then staff may lack necessary guidance to provide appropriate care which could lead to an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that causes harm to a resident due to medical care or lack of medical care). The findings are: A. Record review of R #17's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/06/26 with the following diagnoses:Fracture right femur (serious break of the thigh bone),Type II diabetes mellitus (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY PAST NON-COMPLIANCEBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed, when a transport driver took money from a resident. This deficient practice could result in financial loss, emotional distress, and compromise of resident trust and safety. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Code of Conduct revealed staff were not to ask for or accept tips, gifts, loans, and/or monetary transactions from residents or their family members. Further review revealed the facility has a zero tolerance for any type of misappropriation or exploitation. B. Record review of the facility's follow-up investigation report, dated 11/19/25, for misappropriation of resident property identified the following corrective actions: All drivers were re-educated of the facility's zero-tolerance policy against misappropriation of resident property. A sign was placed in each transportation van to indicate to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a medication error involving 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) to the State Agency as required. This failure limited regulatory oversight and placed the residents at risk for serious harm by delaying external review and corrective action.If a facility fails to report medication errors in accordance with abuse prevention and reporting requirements, then the facility limits the State Agency's ability to ensure resident safety, increasing the risk of unaddressed harm and repeated incidents.The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revised 11/14/25, revealed the facility prohibits abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of patient property, and injuries of unknown source and requires immediate reporting, investigation, and protection of patients. The policy specifies that allegations resulting in serious bodily injury must be reported immediately but no later than two (2) hours, and allegations not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when staff administered a second dose of Mounjaro (GLP-1 Trizepatide) 12.5 milligrams (mg) within 24 hours to 1 (R#1) of (R #1). The facility also failed to ensure accurate medication administration practices consistent with the resident's prescribed regimen. The Findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated January 2025, revealed licensed nurses must administer medications in accordance with the written orders of the prescriber.B. Record review of R #1's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity (severely overweight) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin)C. Record review of the physician orders dated 08/01/25 showed an active order for Mounjaro (tirzepatide) 12.5 mg subcutaneous (under the skin) once weekly, and an active order for Emgality (migraine medication)120…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely when a medication cart remained unlocked and unattended on the 200 Hall. This failure created the potential for unauthorized access to medications, including controlled substances, for 1 of 1 medication carts observed. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Medication Storage and Security Policy, revised January 2025, revealed the facility requires all medications to be kept secured at all times. The policy states medication carts must remain locked when not in the direct possession of licensed staff, and controlled substances must be stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. The policy further states staff must ensure medications are protected from unauthorized access by residents, visitors, or staff.B. On 12/12/25 at 9:17 a.m., observation of the 200 Hall revealed a medication cart positioned in the hallway with the top drawer unlocked. No staff were present in the immediate area, and the cart remained unattended and accessible to residents walking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Nurses and Certified Medication Aides (CMAs) dated opened insulin (a medication prescribed to help the body turn food into energy and manages blood sugar levels) pens and discarded them within 28 days of opening date for 5 (R #8, R #12, R #15, R #32 and R #66) of 5 (R #8, R #12, R #15, R #32 and R #66) residents reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to lead to all five residents receiving medications that are less effective or expired. 2. Staff secured medications and made them inaccessible to unauthorized staff for one medication cart in the 100 hall and one treatment cart in the 400 hall. Improperly stored medications could result in a resident, staff member, or visitor taking medications not prescribed to them. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 60 residents in both halls as identified by the Resident Census provided by the Administrator on 06/22/25. The findings are: Insulin Pens A. Record review of the facility's Insulin Pens Policy, dated 05/01/25, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dishwasher (low temperature dishwashers utilize chemicals for sanitation) worked properly to sanitize the dishes and was repaired timely. If the facility is not properly sanitizing the dishes, then there was the potential for foodborne illnesses which could affect all of the 116 residents listed on the resident census provided by the Administrator on 06/22/25. The findings are: A. Record review of the temperature log for the low-temperature dishwasher showed staff documented 200 parts per million (PPM; a unit used to express the concentration of a substance in a solution) for each meal on 06/23/26. B. On 06/24/25 at 10:27 am, during a kitchen observation, Kitchen Staff #2 checked the low-temp dishwasher's sanitizer level. Kitchen Staff #2 tested the sanitizing solution three times, but the test strips did not show any sanitizer passing through the machine. C. On 06/24/25 at 10:43 am, during an interview, the Kitchen Manager (KM) stated the test strips did not register any sanitizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: Lock a treatment cart (a movable piece of equipment used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense treatment supplies and tools) on the 400 Unit when not in use and unattended. Lock a wound care treatment cart on the 100 Unit when not in use and unattended. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents on the 400 and 100 Units. If staff fail to lock unsupervised treatment carts, then residents could obtain medical equipment which could result in injury or death. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Storage of Medication policy, dated January 2025, revealed the following: Medications are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. 400 Treatment Cart B. On 06/22/25 at 5:43 am, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: - Ensure appropriate treatment and services for 1 (R #26) of 1 (R #26) resident who had urinary retention (a condition that occurs when a person is unable to empty their bladder, either partially or completely) and an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube which drains urine from the bladder). - Ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was used only when clinically necessary for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident. These deficient practices could place the residents at risk for infection or diminished quality of life. The findings are: R #26 A. Record review of R #26's face sheet showed an admission date of 10/06/17 with the following diagnoses: - Tremors (a neurological condition that included shaking or trembling movements in one or more parts of the body), - Spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a type of cerebral palsy), - Congenital hydrocephalus (an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain), - Spinal stenosis cervical region (a bone disease involving the narrowing of the spinal canal at the level of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident received a prescribed anticoagulant (AC, blood thinner) medication at admission to the facility for 1 (R #69) of 1 (R #69), when staff failed to administer warfarin (blood thinner) as ordered by the provider. This deficient practice is likely to lead to increased R #69's risk of blood clot formation. 2. Ensure a resident received prescribed antipsychotic medication (used to treat mental health conditions that involve psychosis) in a timely manner for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident, when staff failed to administer the antipsychotic medication as ordered by the provider. These failures have the potential to lead to the reduction of the medication's effectiveness and potentially lead to a return or worsening of the symptoms. The findings are: Warfarin A. Record review of R #69's Face Sheet, undated, revealed R #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: -Venous thrombosis (blood clot) and embolism…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for 2 (R #5 and #22) of 2 (R #5 and #22) residents observed. If the facility is not ensuring the call light is within residents' reach, then residents are unable to request immediate assistance when needed. The findings are: A. On 06/22/25 at 9:54 am, during an observation, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 left R #5's room with a vital machine (a machine used to take blood pressure, oxygen, and temperature), and R #5's call light was on the floor out of the resident's reach. B. On 06/22/25 at 10:15 am, observation revealed R #22's call light was on the floor, and R #22 lay in bed watching TV. C. On 06/22/25 at 11:00 am, during an interview, CNA #8 confirmed R #22's call light was on the ground. CNA #8 stated R #22 was not her resident, did not pick up R #22's call light, and left the room. CNA #8 stated R #5's call light was on the ground. She stated she was in the resident's room taking vitals, and she did not remember if the resident's call light was on the ground. CNA #8 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to retain his personal property for 1 (R #34) of 1 (R #34) resident when staff removed a resident's Christmas lights from his room and failed to put them back up after the safety rating was approved for use. If staff do not respect a resident's right to personal property, then the resident may become angry, frustrated, and disrespected. The findings are: A. Record review of R #34's face sheet revealed an admission date of 08/22/23 with diagnosis of depression and post-traumatic stress. B. Record review of R #34's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R #34 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS; a screening for cognitive impairment) score of 15, cognitively intact. C. On 06/22/25 at 7:30 am, observation revealed Christmas lights hung around R #34's room. D. Record review of the manufacturer's instructions for R #34's Christmas lights revealed the lights were 4-[NAME] (measurement of electricity) string…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate Baseline Care Plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 2 (R #60, #86) of 2 (R #60, #86) residents reviewed for Baseline Care Plans. This deficient practice could likely result in a decline in the residents' condition due to staff not being aware of the care residents' need, and residents may not attain or maintain their highest level of well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Person-Centered Care Plan policy, last revised 10/24/22, revealed staff must develop and implement a baseline person-centered care plan within 48 hours of admission/readmission for each resident, which included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meets professional standards of quality care. Resident #60 B. Record review of R #60's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 05/12/25 with the following diagnoses: - Other acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and observations, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1(R #1) of 1(R #1) residents observed, when staff failed to report or repair a broken wall inside R #1's room. This deficient practice is likely to lead to the following: 1. Creating an environment conducive to mold and mildew growth. 2. Mice can enter through the broken wall and cause significant damage, spread diseases, and create unpleasant odors. They can chew through insulation, wiring, and other building materials, potentially leading to fires or structural problems. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's Face Sheet, undated, revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the facility's Work Orders Report dated 11/01/24 through 04/22/25 showed staff did not report the broken wall in R #1's room. C. On 04/21/25 at 9:00 am, during observation of R #1's room, part of the wall was broken and had a hole. D. On 04/21/25 at 9:05 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order and professional standards of practice for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice could likely cause staff to incorrectly administer a medication, which could cause the gastronomy tube (g-tube; a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) to clog and or incompatible medications to be administered together. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 02/19/24, revealed the following: - The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident was diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI; injury to the brain caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), cerebrovascular accident (CVA; stroke), and transient ischemic attack (TIA; when blood flow to part of the brain stops for a brief period of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff served meals that were attractive and palatable (pleasant to taste) for 6 (R #'s 2, 7, 29, 36, 49, and 309) of 10 (R #'s 2, 7, 15, 29, 36, 37, 39, 49, 104 and 309) residents reviewed for meal quality. This deficient practice reduces residents' ability to eat and enjoy meals, may decrease their quality of life, and could likely lose weight. The findings are: A. On 03/25/24 at 11:05 AM during an interview, R #309 stated the food was not always hot and arrived to her room cold. B. On 03/25/24 at 11:15 AM during an interview, R #2 stated the food was regularly cold and unappetizing by the time it arrived to her room. C. On 03/25/24 at 11:21 am during an interview, R #29 stated the food was often unidentifiable, there was not much variety, and the food tasted awful. D. On 03/25/24 at 12:30 PM during an interview, R #49 stated she was served raw chicken on several unknown dates. She said most of the time her food was cold when staff delivered it to her room . E. On 03/25/24 at 1:26 PM during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview record review, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to monitor the internal temperature of food to ensure it is safe for consumption. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents getting a food borne illness and could likely affect all 115 residents identified on the census list provided by the Administrator on 02/12/24. The findings are: A. On 03/25/24 at 10:58 AM during an interview, R #39 stated his food was always served cold. B. On 03/25/24 at 11:05 AM during an interview, R #309 stated the food was not always hot and arrived to her room cold. C. On 03/25/24 at 11:15 AM during an interview, R #2 stated the food was regularly cold and unappetizing by the time it arrived to her room. D. On 03/25/24 at 12:30 PM during an interview with R #49, she said she was served raw chicken on several unknown dates. She said most of the time when her food was delivered to her room it was cold. E. On 03/25/24 at 1:26 PM during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated standardized assessment tool completed by facility staff, that measures health status in nursing home residents) assessments included accurate insulin use information for 2 (R #2 and R #3) of 2 (R #2 and R #3) residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the most optimal and personalized care required to meet their highest practicable outcomes. The findings are: R #2 A. Record review of R #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/19/2024, Section N, indicated R #2 received seven insulin injections during the seven day look back period (The time period over which staff observe a resident to capture the resident's condition or status for the MDS assessment. Unless otherwise stated, the look back period is seven days, and only those occurrences during the look back period will be captured on the MDS.) B. Record Review of R #2's physician's order summary, dated January 2024, did not include an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to support residents in activities of daily living by not offering showers to residents in accordance with a pre-planned and agreed upon schedule and not answering call lights in a timely manner for 3 (R #2, R #73, and R #309) of 3 (R #2, R #73, and R #309) residents sampled for ADLs. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact resident safety, comfort, and to impede processes such as timely incontinence care (assisting residents to the bathroom or changing adult briefs) and showers. The findings are: Finding related to showers: R #309 A. Record review of R #309's care plan, revised on 03/17/24, revealed R #309 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and required activities of daily living (ADL) assistance in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, transfers, locomotion, and toileting. B. Record review of R #309's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medications in medication carts by allowing loose medications under the medication cards (cards that contain individually sealed tablets in which the medication must be pushed through the foil in order to take the medication). This deficient practice has the likelihood to result in all residents on hall 300 and 400, as identified on the census list provided by the administrator on [DATE], to receive expired or improperly temperature-controlled medications that have either lost their potency or effectiveness. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 8:33 am, during an observation of the 400 hall medication cart, a loose round, white tablet lay under the medication cards. B. On [DATE] at 8:44 am, during observation of the 300 hall medication cart, loose medications lay under the medication cards. The loose medications included one white oval tablet, two pink oval tablets, one liquid capsule, and two white circular tablets. C. On [DATE] at 10:22 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
*This is a repeat deficiency. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to take into consideration food preferences (choices) for 2 (R #36 and R #49) of 2 (R #36 and R #49) residents by not providing an alternative meal substitution as per resident request. This deficient practice could likely affect all 116 residents identified on the facility census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 03/25/24 and could likely result in residents feeling frustrated that staff do not support their rights and choices. The findings are: Resident #36 A. Record review of posted lunch menu for 03/27/24 revealed staff to serve the following for lunch: Country fried steak with mushroom gravy or fish tacos with flour tortilla, dinner roll, pineapple tidbits, seasoned potato wedges, and seasoned green beans or Mexican street corn. B. Record review of Available Daily Lunch and Dinner Menu revealed the following items were available: Grilled cheese sandwich; peanut butter and jelly sandwich; ham and cheese sandwich; chef salad with vinaigrette (a type of salad dressing); and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 1 (R #309) of 1 (R #309) resident reviewed for oxygen therapy when staff failed to: - Ensure physician orders for oxygen therapy were entered into the resident's medical record. - Ensure O2 tubing was properly dated and labeled with the last equipment change. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not getting the therapeutic results required for optimal health. The findings are: A. Record review of R #309's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including (not an all-inclusive list): - Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen is delivered to maintain the body's normal functions), - Hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, - Asthma, unspecified, - Chronic diastolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
*This is a repeat deficiency. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to serve food according to the presented menu. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 116 residents listed on the census presented by the Administrator (ADM) on 03/25/24 and could likely result in resident frustration and/or dissatisfaction with meal options and therefore residents' may not receive required nutrition to maintain their best health. A. On 03/26/24 at 9:42 am during an interview, R #37 stated there was not much variety, and the menu was not followed. R#99 B. Record review of posted lunch menu for 03/27/24 revealed staff to serve the following for lunch: Country fried steak with mushroom gravy or fish tacos with flour tortilla, dinner roll, pineapple tidbits, seasoned potato wedges, and seasoned green beans or Mexican street corn. C. On 03/27/24 at 11:57 am during a random meal observation, staff served R #99 a plate of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes with brown gravy, and a small bowl of salad. Staff did not serve the resident the items on the posted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was functioning as intended for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident reviewed for call system functioning. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unable to notify staff when they are in need of assistance. The findings are: A. On 03/25/24 at 1:48 PM during an observation, R #3 was in her bed with a bed side commode (BSC) next to her bed. A call light button was attached to the BSC. B. On 03/25/24 at 1:50 PM during an interview, R #3 stated her call light did not work and has not worked for several days. She added she notified multiple staff members, and nothing has been done about it. C. On 03/25/24 at 1:52 PM, during an observation, R #3 pressed the call light button two separate times. The hallway indicator light did not activate on either attempt. D. Record review of facility's maintenance work orders revealed the record did not contain an open or resolved work order for R #3's call light. E. On 03/27/24 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator stated R #3's call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents observed of a sample of 33 residents (Resident (R) 94 and (R)20) had emergency calling devices or alternative communication devices accessible while in their beds. These failures had the potential to delay needed assistance and negatively impact the quality of life. Findings include: A. Review of the facility's Call Lights policy, dated 10/24/21, revealed, Patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within their reach at all times when unattended. B. Review of R94's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. C. Review of R94's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) located in the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 10/18/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R94 scored three out of 15 which indicated R94 had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an incident resulting in an injury for one (Resident (R) 516) of 3 residents sampled for falls. This deficient practice could likely result in preventing staff from determining the cause of the incident and identifying the need for staff training and implementing interventions to address such incidents in the facility. The findings are: A. Review of the Accidents/Incidents policy dated 10/24/22 provided by the facility revealed, Center staff will report, review, and investigate all accidents/incidents which occurred, or allegedly occurred, on or off Center property and involving, or allegedly involving, a patient who is receiving services .The licensed nurse will: Report accidents/incidents and assist with completion of a timely investigation to determine root cause; Take immediate post-accident/incident measures as deemed appropriate; Implement appropriate interventions based on conclusions; Update the care plan and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for one (Resident (R) 516) of 3 residents sampled for falls. This deficient practice could likely result in preventing staff from determining the cause of the incident and identifying the need for staff training and implementing interventions to address such incidents in the facility. The findings are: A. Review of the Accidents/Incidents policy dated 10/24/22 provided by the facility revealed, Center staff will report, review, and investigate all accidents/incidents which occurred, or allegedly occurred, on or off Center property and involving, or allegedly involving, a patient who is receiving services .The licensed nurse will: Report accidents/incidents and assist with completion of a timely investigation to determine root cause; Take immediate post-accident/incident measures as deemed appropriate; Implement appropriate interventions based on conclusions; Update the care plan and communicate with the patient and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of 33 sampled resident's (Resident (R) 27 and R70) care plan interventions were implemented for R27's nutritional risk monitoring of meal intakes, and failed to ensure a care plan was developed for R70's prescribed neck brace, oxygen therapy and C-PAP [a method of respiratory therapy in which air is pumped into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth during spontaneous breathing, used in the treatment of sleep apnea and other respiratory disorders]. The facility's failure had the potential to increase R27's risk of insufficient nutritional intake and R70's risk for potential of respiratory and neck brace complications. Findings include: A. Review of facility provided policy titled Person-Centered Care Plan dated 10/24/22 revealed The Center must . develop .implement .care plan .for each patient/resident .instructions to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide quality care in accordance with physician orders for one (Resident (R) 517) out of 33 sampled residents. The facility failed to notify the physician of elevated blood sugars in accordance with physician's orders. This had the potential for the resident to not receive timely care and services related to her high blood sugars. Findings include: A. Review of the undated admission Record, in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R517 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. B. Review of the Care Plan dated 11/28/22 in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed R517 has a diagnosis of diabetes with insulin dependency and will be free of all signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia such as: sweating, trembling, thirst, fatigue, weakness, blurred vision for 90 days .R517 has diabetes creating a potential for hypo or hyperglycemia and other complications .Fingerstick sugars…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R)516) of three sample residents reviewed for falls received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. The facility failed to maintain adequate documentation concerning R516's injury and determine the root cause of the accident. Findings include: A. Review of the Accidents/Incidents policy dated 10/24/22 provided by the facility revealed, Center staff will report, review, and investigate all accidents/incidents which occurred, or allegedly occurred, on or off Center property and involving, or allegedly involving, a patient who is receiving services .The licensed nurse will: Report accidents/incidents and assist with completion of a timely investigation to determine root cause; Take immediate post-accident/incident measures as deemed appropriate; Implement appropriate interventions based on conclusions; Update the care plan and communicate with the patient and appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sample residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for catheters and urinary tract infections (UTIs) received appropriate catheter treatment and services to potentially prevent UTIs. Findings include: A. Review of the facility's Catheter: Indwelling Urinary-Care of policy, updated 06/01/21, revealed, .Secure catheter tubing to keep the drainage bag .off the floor. B. Review of R1's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe sepsis, urinary tract infection (UTI), and COVID-19. C. Review of R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) located in the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/01/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R1 scored a 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed regarding portion size for one resident of six reviewed for meal portions. (Resident (R)324). The had the potential for the resident's nutrition not being met. Findings include: A. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/22 located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the MDS tab indicated R324 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. B. Review of the EMR in the Med Diag tab revealed R324 had a diagnosis of Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. C. Review of physician's Orders in the Orders tab of the EMR revealed an order dated 12/07/22 for regular texture and double portion entrée and sides. D. Review of the Diet Order and Communication Form located in the EMR under the Misc tab dated 12/07/22 indicated R324 would receive a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to offer food according to diet orders for two out of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R)516 and R518). This failure had the potential to place R516 and R518 at risk for nutritional issues. Findings include: A. Review of the undated Dining and Food Preferences policy provided by the facility revealed, Individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are identified for all residents/patients.The Dining Services Director, or designee, will interview the resident or resident representative to complete a Food Preference Interview within 48 hours of admission. The Registered Dietitian/Nutritionist (RDN) or other clinically qualified nutrition professional will review, and after consultation with the resident, adjust the individual meal plan to ensure adequate fluid volume and appropriate nutritional content for residents that do not consume certain foods or food groups. B. Review of the undated admission Record in the Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was operating for one out of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R)516). The call light had been inoperable for at least two months and although it had been reported to staff, it had not been repaired. This had the potential for the resident's needs not being met in a timely manner. Findings include: A. Review of the undated admission Record in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R516 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a discharge of 11/24/22 home and then she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included history of falls, type 1 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and obstructive sleep apnea. B. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/11/22 in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed R516 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 14 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,909 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $39,910 — penalty dated 2026-03-20
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-06-27
- $14,314 — penalty dated 2024-03-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-23 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMMIT CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/25/2007 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/25/2007 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUMMIT CARE PARENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2013 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| BERRY, KARISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/12/2025 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| ROTHMAN, EMILY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/12/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325034. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.