Uptown Rehabilitation Center
7900 Constitution Avenue NE, Albuquerque, NM 87110 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (505) 296-5565 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 11.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.9% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 2.0% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.0% | 11.7% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.7% | 14.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.1% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.7% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.0% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 86.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 22.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 15.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 1.65 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.22 | 2.81 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.2%CMS range 48.2–65.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.2–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.8–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to protect the right of one of one resident reviewed for abuse (Resident (R) 51) to be free from physical abuse by R111. R51 suffered two events of physical abuse by R111 when R111 was not adequately supervised following the first event of abuse. The second event resulted in R51 being hospitalized for a fractured arm and a head laceration requiring stitches. Immediate action to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and/or monitoring to any resident threatening the health and safety of themselves or others was required to prevent recurrence of the situation. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed on 11/16/21 at 6:30 PM that Immediate Jeopardy existed related to the failure to ensure R51 was free from abuse by R111 and the failure to prevent a recurrence of the abuse with adequate supervision of R111. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/28/22, the date of both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R) R21 was properly transferred with a two-person assist instead of a one-person assist, which resulted in causing harm to R21. R21 sustained a fractured left tibia during a transfer. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that four residents (R11, R37, R54 and R262) were properly supervised from keeping smoking materials (lighters) on their person and smoking in undesignated area. Findings include: Review of facility provided policy titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfer Equipment revised 10/01/21 indicated Staff may use safe resident handling equipment, such as lifts or repositioning equipment, for patients/residents when needed. Patients will be assessed to determine the correct equipment to use. Staff will be trained in the use of each type of equipment. Slide boards are an approved method of transfer. Due to the variety of lifts used in centers, manufacturer's instructions will be used.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 2 (R #2 and #4) of 2 (R #2 and #4) residents, when staff failed to: Obtain and review physician ordered laboratory testing (controlled testing performed on biological, environmental, or other health related samples to support diagnosis, monitoring, prevention, and research of diseases and health conditions) within a timeframe that meets professional standards for R #2 and R #4.This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's laboratory (controlled testing is performed on biological, environmental, or other health-related samples to support diagnosis, monitoring, prevention, and research of diseases and health conditions) policy, revised on [DATE], revealed the following: Diagnostic tests (medical procedures that provide objective insights into your body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for 2 (R #9 and #25) of 4 (R #5, #6, #9, and #25) residents, when the facility staff failed to:Ensure the residents' bed wheels were locked while the beds were in use to prevent falls.This deficient practice is likely to result in residents getting injured in avoidable accidents and putting residents at risk of serious injury and harm.The findings are: R #9: A. Record review of R #9's face sheet revealed an admission date of 05/28/25 with the following diagnoses: Muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet.impaired gait (deviation from normal walking) and mobility issues.Chronic pain.Third degree burns (severe, full thickness burns that destroy all layers of the skin and underlying tissues, requiring immediate medical attention) with skin graft (a surgical procedure in which healthy skin is taken from one part of the body and transplanted to cover an area of damaged or missing skin).Right foot drop (cannot lift the front part of the foot due to weakness or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-29 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #16) of 1 (R #16) resident received necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs, when staff failed to refer them for behavioral health services after they experienced depression symptoms and voiced self harm statements. This deficient practice is likely to result in worsening behaviors and failure to receive the behavioral or mental health care needed to improve mood and reduce depression and anxiety. The findings are: A. Record review of R #16's face sheet revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 with the following diagnoses:Major depressive disorder (is a common and serious mental illness that affects your mood and interest in life).Parkinson's disease (is a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves).Macular degeneration (causes reversible vision loss).Alzheimer's disease (is a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior).Anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive distress that affects daily life). B. Record review of R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident, when:The facility staff did not ensure a physician's order was accurate for administering Lactated Ringer solution (LR; an intravenous fluid used to replace lost fluids and electrolytes and help correct acid base imbalances), and the LR solution was not administered as expected in accordance with professional standards of practice.If ordered intravenous fluids are not administered as intended, residents may receive substandard care and treatment, placing them at risk for preventable harm. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's intravenous fluid and drug administration policy, dated 10/2024, revealed the following:A licensed independent practitioner's order is required for all IV infusions. The nurse shall assess the appropriateness of the prescribed therapy, including the resident's condition, dose, route, and rate of the ordered solution or medication. The nurse shall monitor the resident for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive unnecessary pain management medications for 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6) resident. This deficient practice is likely to lead to unwanted drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are: A. Record review of R #6's face sheet revealed an admission date of 05/12/26 and a discharge date of 05/29/26, with the following diagnoses:Acute osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of the right ankle.Fracture of shaft of left clavicle (left shoulder fracture). B. Record review of R #6's care plan, dated 05/13/26, revealed R #6 is at risk for substance use (refers to the consumption of alcohol, tobacco, prescription medications, or illicit drugs, which may lead to negative physical, mental, or social consequences) related to a history of addiction. C. Record review of R #6's hospital medication summary, dated 05/12/26, revealed R #6 was to receive the following medications upon discharge from the hospital: Buprenorphine-naloxone (suboxone; a combination medication used to treat opioid/narcotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed, when: The facility failed to ensure R #1 received a newly prescribed antibiotic, after staff were aware of the new antibiotic orders.If the facility fails to obtain and administer a prescribed antibiotic for a resident with an active infection, then residents are likely to experience a worsening infection, disease progression, and avoidable complications. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Osteomyelitis, right ankle and foot (inflammation of bone and bone marrow),Cellulitis of the lower right limb (deep inflammation of the tissues just under the skin; caused by infection). R #1 was discharged from the facility on 10/14/2025. B. Record review of R #1's Physician Assistant (PA) progress note, dated 10/13/2025, revealed R #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions when dietary staff failed to wear hairnets while in the kitchen. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 120 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 07/29/25 and are likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being prepared and safe food handling practices are not adhered to.The findings are:A. On 07/29/25 at 8:04 am, observation revealed [NAME] prepared and served food in the kitchen and did not wear a hair net.B. On 07/29/25 at 8:30 am, observation revealed Kitchen Account Manager (KAM) walked in the kitchen and did not wear a hair net.C. On 07/29/25 at 8:19 am, during an interview with the Cook, she confirmed she was not wearing a hairnet when preparing and serving resident meals. She stated she should be wearing a hairnet while working in the kitchen.D. On 07/29/25 at 8:39 am, during an interview with the KAM, she stated all kitchen staff including herself should be wearing hair nets when entering and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program (measures to eradicate and contain common household pests) so that the facility is free of pests and rodents. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 120 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 07/29/25 and are likely lead to airborne illnesses, emotional distress, and may deteriorate quality of life in residents.The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Infection Control Practices policy, dated 01/08/24, revealed the following:- All tasks will be documented in the TELS (a building management platform that helps maintenance staff with facility maintenance, life safety code inspection and testing, and asset management) Preventive Maintenance program.- The facility will provide a pest free environment by contracting a pest control vendor for appropriate services on a periodic basis whether weekly, monthly, or as needed. B. Record review of the facility's monthly resident council minutes revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to close or lock the computer screen on the medication cart making personal information inaccessible to unauthorized staff and other residents for 1 (R #18) of 1 (R #18). This deficient practice could cause other to view sensitive, private, medical information. The findings are: A. On 07/29/25 at 1:05 pm, an observation was made of Nurse #9 walking away from the medication cart without locking the computer screen. Nurse #9 was observed to walk into a resident's room. Other (unidentified resident and staff members) were also present on the hall. The computer screen was open with medical information for an unidentified resident up on the screen. B. On 07/29/25 at 1:08 pm, an observation was made of the Unit Manager (UM) #2 walking down the hall. UM stopped at the medication cart and closed the screen to the computer. She was observed telling Nurse #9, he needed to close or lock the screen on the medication cart every time he walks away from it. C. On 07/29/25 at 1:08 pm, during an interview with the UM #2 she stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not following physician orders for 1 (R #15) of 1 (R #15) resident reviewed for diabetic medications. Failure to follow physician orders is likely to cause residents to not receive the care and treatment they require. The findings are: A. Record review of R #15 face sheet revealed an admission date of 05/26/24. R #15 had a diagnosis of: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD; lung disease). -Type II diabetes (DM2, a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin). -Hodgkin lymphoma (type of cancer that affects the lymphatic system) -Asthma (chronic lung disease). -Cardiomegaly (a medical condition in which the heart becomes enlarged). B. Record review of R #15's physician orders revealed the following orders: -Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous (fat layer between skin and muscle) Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/milliliter. Inject 18 unit subcutaneously one time a day for Diabetes Mellitus type 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders when staff did not enter an order for a nebulizer (device that turns liquid medication into a fine mist, allowing it to be inhaled directly into the lungs) treatment into the medical record for 1 (R #15) of 1 (R #15) resident. This deficient practice could likely result in a resident not receiving the treatment as ordered by the physician which could cause the resident's respiratory status to be compromised. The findings are: A. Record review of R #15's face sheet revealed an admission date of 05/26/24 with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD; lung disease). -Type II diabetes (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin). -Hodgkin lymphoma (type of cancer that affects the lymphatic system) -Asthma (chronic lung disease). -Cardiomegaly (a medical condition in which the heart becomes enlarged). B. Record review of R #15's encounter notes, dated 05/17/25 at 1:00 am and written by telehealth provider after hours, revealed R #15 experienced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to secure medications and make them inaccessible to unauthorized staff for one medication cart on the 300 hall, creating a risk of unauthorized staff or residents taking a medication not prescribed to them. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 25 residents residing on 300 hall as identified by the Resident Census provided by the Administrator on 07/29/25.A. On 07/29/25 at 1:05 pm, an observation was made of Nurse #9 walking away from the medication cart without locking it. Nurse #9 was observed to walk into a resident's room. Other (unidentified resident and staff members) were also present on the hall.B. On 07/29/25 at 1:08 pm, an observation was made of the Unit Manager (UM) #2 walking down the hall. UM stopped at the medication cart and locked it. She was observed telling Nurse #9 he needed to lock the medication cart every time he walks away from it. C. On 07/29/25 at 1:08 pm, during an interview with the UM #2 she stated the expectation is to lock the medication cart every time a nurse walks away from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 118 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 04/28/25 when staff failed to: 1. Serve the food items listed on the menu. 2. Provide residents with the opportunity to select their choice from the menu or alternate menu in advance of meal service. If the facility is not providing meal as listed on the menu or offering residents the option to select their choice of meal in advance of meal service, then residents are likely to experience frustration, depression, weight loss, and feel unimportant. The findings are: A. Record review of posted lunch menu for 04/30/25 revealed the following: - Main menu item was sausage pizza with marinated cucumber salad. - Alternate menu item was crispy breaded chicken, corn with fresh herbs, and a dinner roll with margarine. - Dessert was a peanut butter cookie. B. On 04/30/25 at 12:24 pm, an observation of the lunch meal service revealed staff served R #19 a cubed pork with peppers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all garbage and refuse containers had lids or were covered when not in use. This deficient practice could likely affect all 118 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 04/28/25. This deficient practice could likely result in the unintentional sheltering and feeding of pests. The findings are: A. On 04/28/25 at 9:23 am during an observation, the kitchen the garbage dumpster, located outside the back entrance of the kitchen, was full of garbage, uncovered, and not in use. B. On 05/02/25 at 10:01 am during an observation, the outside dumpster contained garbage, uncovered, and not in use. C. On 05/02/25 at 10:08 am during an interview, the Maintenance Director (MD) stated staff place all facility garbage, to include the kitchen trash, in the dumpster located outside the back entrance to the kitchen. D. On 05/02/25 at 10:29 A.M., during an interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated all garbage containers should be closed or covered. She stated it was the kitchen staff's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide complete documentation of an infection surveillance plan (ISP, a system for tracking and monitoring infections) for identifying, tracking, monitoring, and reporting of infections, communicable diseases (an illness that can spread from one person to another), and outbreaks (the occurrence of more cases of disease than expected in a given area or among a specific group of people over a particular period of time) among residents and staff. This failed practice has the potential to affect all 118 residents in the facility. This deficient practice is likely to lead to a higher risk of patient harm, difficulty identifying and addressing outbreaks, and difficulty tracking the effectiveness of infection prevention measures (basic practices to stop the spread of germs). The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) documentation, undated, revealed it did not include the following: - A procedure on how staff monitored residents to identify possible infections and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a comprehensive Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP, a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use). This failed practice has the potential to affect all 118 residents in the facility. Residents identified on the matrix provided by the Administrator on 04/30/25. This deficient practice could likely result in the inappropriate use of antibiotics and lead to resistance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO; a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics). The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy, dated 12/16/24, revealed the purpose of the policy was to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use and prevent the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms. B. Record review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP), revealed the facility did not have a proper and adequate ASP that included: 1. Written antibiotic use protocols on antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and comfortable environment for residents when staff failed to: 1) Repair damaged and broken blinds in resident rooms #103, #109, #206, #305, #309, and #311. 2) Repair broken wall tiles in resident bathrooms in rooms #103, #106, and #107. 3) Paint over unpainted drywall in resident rooms #101, #102, #103, #107, #302, #303, and #305. 4) Clean dust from ceiling fans above the dining room eating area. 5) Replace stained tablecloths in the dining room. 6) Ensure the cleanliness of vending machines in the common area. 7) Maintain the conference room in a clean, uncluttered, and hazard-free condition. Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to result in unsafe conditions and prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. These deficient practices could likely result in residents feeling frustrated, embarrassed, and unimportant. The findings are: Broken Blinds A. On 04/28/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plans for 2 (R #7 and R #24) of 2 (R #7 and R #24) residents reviewed. Staff failed to update the care plans to reflect each resident's current needs regarding the use of appropriate utensils during mealtime. Appropriate utensils refer to those assessed as safe and suitable for the resident based on their physical and mental condition (e.g., plastic utensils instead of metal for residents with a history of self-harm). If care plans are not updated to reflect residents' current needs, then staff may provide inappropriate items or assistance, which could result in unmet care needs and safety risks. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's face sheet revealed an admission date of 05/26/25 with the following diagnoses: - Unspecified dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), -Muscle weakness (reduction in the power exerted by muscles.) B. Record review of R #7's Care Plan, dated 03/04/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free of the potential for accidents and hazards for all residents when staff failed to: - Ensure accurate smoking supervision assessments were completed for R #7; - Ensure residents did not have lighters in their rooms; - Ensure staff did not store personal belongings in resident rooms; - Prevent unsecured bleach cleaning wipes from being left in resident bathrooms. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for burns, fire-related injuries, chemical exposure, and ingestion of unsafe substances. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of facility's Smoking Safety policy, dated 04/10/24, revealed all smoking supplies (to include tobacco, matches, lighters, and lighter fluid) must be labeled with the resident's name, room number, and bed number; maintained by staff; and stored in a suitable cabinet at the nurses station. Lighters are not permitted in resident rooms due to fire risk, especially when oxygen is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Nurses and Certified Medication Aides (CMAs) dated opened insulin (a medication prescribed to help the body turn food into energy and manages blood sugar levels) pens and discarded them within 28 days of the opening date for 5 (R #5, R #27, R #47, R #71, R #82) of 5 (R #5, R #27, R #47, R #71, R #82) residents reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in all five residents receiving medications that are less effective or expired. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated January 2023, revealed the following: - Note the date on the label for insulin vials and pens when first used. - The policy did not address discarding insulin pens within 28 days of opening. B. Record review of the manufacturer's instructions for Insulin Glargine multiple dose vial, dated 2022, revealed staff were instructed to throw away all opened vials after 28 days of use, even if there was insulin left in the pen. C. Record review of the manufacturer's instructions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions when they failed to: - Ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination and outdated use. - Maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. - Ensure employees wore hair restraints. - Ensure staff did not serve drinks with their hands on the rim of the cup. This deficient practice could likely affect all 118 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 04/28/25. If food was not stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions then residents are at an increased risk of contracting food born illness, having weightloss, and may feel unimportant. The findings are: Food Storage A. On 04/28/25 at 9:53 am, an observation of the facility's kitchen revealed the walk-in refrigerator contained three large serving trays with uncovered, unlabeled, and undated beverages. B. On 04/28/25 at 9:55 am during an interview, the Corporate Dietary Manager (CDM) stated there should not be any uncovered, unlabeled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to: - Ensure call lights were in working order when staff failed to report and repair two broken call lights on the 400 hall shower room; - Ensure a call light was within reach for 1 (R #120) of 1 (R #120). If the facility is not ensuring a working call light system or maintaining the call light is not within residents' reach, then residents are unable to request immediate assistance when needed. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Call Lights Policy, dated 02/01/23, revealed all residents will have a call light or alternative communication device within their reach at all times when unattended. 400 Hall Shower Room B. Record review of a Work Order, dated 04/03/25, revealed staff reported the 400 hall shower room call lights did not have strings. C. Record review of Nurse call system test via TELS, dated 05/01/25, revealed the Maintenance Director inspected 400 hall call lights, including the shower room, on 03/31/25 and 04/28/25. The call lights passed both inspections. D. On 04/29/25 at 3:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Ceiling Tiles H. Record review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed the facility did not have a policy regarding the maintenance of ceiling tiles. I. On 05/02/25 at 01:25 P.M., observation of the 100 hallway revealed the following: - A ceiling tile located near resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had open space. - A ceiling tile located outside the business office had a 1 inch triangular hole. - A ceiling tile located in the dining room near the exit door had a 1/2 inch hole. - A ceiling tile located in hallway 100, at the entrance doors, had two 1 inch circular holes. J. On 05/02/25 at 12:05 P.M., observation of the Dining Room revealed the following: - A cracked ceiling tile with unsealed space around a sprinkler head. - A cracked ceiling tile with a 1/4 inch unsealed space around the base of a ceiling fan. K. On 05/02/25 at 1:50 P.M., during an interview, the MD stated he was in charge of the life safety and maintenance of the facility. He stated he did not change out the broken ceiling tiles unless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) was properly documented for 1 (R #42) of 1 (R # 42) resident reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially lifesaving procedures. The findings are: A. Record review of R #42's face sheet, undated, revealed the following: - admission date of [DATE]. - Advanced directive was Do Not Resuscitate [DNR; does not want to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; an emergency procedure that combines chest compression with artificial ventilation) performed if their heart or breathing stops.] C. Record review of R #42's New Mexico Medical Orders For Scope of Treatment (MOST), dated [DATE], revealed R #42 advanced directive was a Full Code (desired life saving procedures, such as CPR.) D. On [DATE] at 02:58 PM during an interview with Unit Manager (UM) #1, she stated R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-05-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive assessment completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #42) of 1 (R #42) resident reviewed for MDS assessments. This deficient practice could result in failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the resident's needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #42's face sheet revealed an admission date of 08/22/20 and included the following diagnoses: - Alcohol use, unspecified with alcohol-induced persisting amnestic (memory deficit). - Cognitive functions and awareness. -Alcohol abuse. B. Record review of R # 42's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the following: - Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; screening for cognitive impairment) score of 14, moderately impaired cognition. - The resident did not have an acute change in mental status from resident's baseline (starting mental status.) - The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to date the oxygen tubing for 1 (R #325) of 1 (R #325) residents reviewed for oxygen. If the facility is not dating and initialing the oxygen tubing and humidifiers (provide moisture when delivering oxygen) then staff may be unaware as to when the tubing and humidifier should be changed and could cause the tubing to become dirty leading to reduced oxygen flow. The findings are: R #325 A. Record review of R #325's physician orders, dated May 2025, revealed the following: - Oxygen at 2 liter (L) per minute via nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose), continuously. Every day and night shift. Start date 05/02/25. - Oxygen tubing change weekly. Label each component with date and initials. Start date 05/02/25. B. On 05/02/25 at 12:08 pm, during an observation, R #325's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle did not have the staff initials or date. C. On 05/02/25 at 12:18 pm, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8, she confirmed staff did not label R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained routine dental care for 2 (R #15 and R #48) of 2 (R #15 and R #48) residents reviewed for dental services. This deficient practice is likely to cause the resident unnecessary pain, embarrassment over the condition/appearance of teeth, and potential dental or oral complications. The findings are: R # 15: A. On 04/28/25 at 12:15 PM, during an observation and interview, R #15 did not have visible teeth or dentures. R #15 said she needed to be seen by the dentist, because her dentures did not fit properly. B. Record review of R #15 Oral Health Evaluation, dated 12/10/23, revealed R #15 was at risk for oral health and dental care problems. R #15's last dentist appointment was on 08/22/22. The resident required an follow-up dental appointment for proper fitting dentures. C. Record review of R #15's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the following - Physician order, dated 11/14/24, dental referral. - R #15 did not have a follow-up dentist appointment. R #48: D. On 04/28/25 at 11:57 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not following physician orders for 1 (R #2) of 3 (R #2, 3 and 4) residents reviewed for diabetic medications. Failure to follow physician orders is likely to cause residents to not receive the care and treatment they require. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Type II diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition which results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), - Diabetic neuropathy (a type of nerve damage that occurs as a complication with diabetes), - Diabetic ophthalmic complication (damage to eyes caused by diabetes), - Blindness in left eye. - This is not all inclusive list. B. Record review of R #2's physician orders revealed the following orders: - Glipizide (oral diabetes medicine that helps control blood sugar levels) oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed when staff failed to consider a resident's feelings due to her pain levels. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident to feel like she was not being heard and did not matter. The findings are: Cross reference with F697. A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/09/25, with the following diagnoses: - Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), - Traumatic brain injury (TBI is the result from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), - Neurogenic bladder (the lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), - Cognitive communication deficit (consequence of brain injuries that affects a person's ability to communicate effectively), - Cervical subluxation (partial misalignment or displacement of the vertebrae in the neck), - Traumatic nondisplaced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (SSA) an allegation of staff to resident abuse for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for abuse. If the facility fails to report allegations of abuse to the SSA, then corrective measures may not be acted on and the SSA will not be unable to ensure residents are free from abuse. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/09/25, with the following diagnoses: - Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), - Traumatic brain injury (TBI is the result from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), - Neurogenic bladder (the lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), - Cognitive communication deficit (consequence of brain injuries that affects a person's ability to communicate effectively), - Cervical subluxation (partial misalignment or displacement of the vertebrae in the neck), - Traumatic nondisplaced spondylolisthesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to manage a resident's pain for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice could likely cause a resident to experience a decline physical and emotional health if the resident's pain was not managed and effectively controlled. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/09/25, with the following diagnoses: - Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), - Traumatic brain injury (TBI is the result from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), - Neurogenic bladder (the lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), - Cognitive communication deficit (consequence of brain injuries that affects a person's ability to communicate effectively), - Cervical subluxation (partial misalignment or displacement of the vertebrae in the neck), - Traumatic nondisplaced spondylolisthesis of cervical vertebra (a condition in which one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a podiatry consult and care for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for foot care. This deficient practice likely caused R #1 not to receive foot care as ordered by a physician which could result in more serious foot problems. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 11/26/18. The resident went to the hospital for a fall on 05/30/24 and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following list of diagnoses (not all-inclusive): - Right femur fracture (break in the thigh bone). - Dementia with agitation (loss of cognitive function with issues such as sleeping or having hallucinations). - Mood disturbance and anxiety (emotional disturbance that impacts emotional health). - Neuropathies (affects the nerves in your body and can be painful). - Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes, dated 05/05/24, revealed R #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were updated with necessary documents and accurate for 2 (R #1 and #2) of 2 (R #1 and #2) residents reviewed for foot care. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not knowing residents' daily care events, changes, and their needs. The findings are. R #1 A. Record review R #1's nursing progress notes, dated 05/05/24, indicated R #1 requested to see a podiatrist but refused to allow the nurse to see her feet. B. Record review of R #1's physician order, dated 05/14/24, indicated a podiatry consult was ordered. C. Record review of R #1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the records did not contain documentation a podiatrist saw R #1 after 5/14/24 or that R #1 refused podiatry care. D. On 11/14/24 at 10:29 am, during an interview, the Administrator confirmed R #1's chart did not contain updated podiatry documentation. The Administrator stated R #2 frequently refused care, to include monthly podiatrist visits, and was now scheduled to see the podiatrist yearly. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staff to meet the needs of all 116 residents who resided in the facility when staff failed to offer baths or showers to residents as scheduled. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact resident comfort. The findings are: A. Refer to F0677 for findings related to baths/showers. B. On 08/16/24 at 10:32 am during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she stated there was a shortage of staff at times. She stated she saw most bath or shower problems during the night shift and not the day shift. C. On 08/16/24 at 11:14 am during an interview with an anonymous staff member (ASM), they stated the facility was understaffed and a lot of the staff wasburnt out due to it. The ASM stated residents went without bathsor showers frequently due to the lack of staff, and nurses had to give baths or showers most of the time to make up for the lack of staff available. The ASM confirmed the residents' needs are not met because of the lack of staffing. D. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean, in good condition, and free from clutter for all residents who resided on the 400 Unit and were sampled for a homelike environment. Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to result in unsafe conditions and prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. The findings are: A. On 08/14/24 at 9:48 am during a 400 unit observation, three mattresses and an oxygen (O2) concentrator (machine used to deliver O2) were observed on the floor, against the hallway railings and by room (RM) #401. B. On 08/14/24 at 11:45 am during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #3, she confirmed the above findings and stated those should not have been left in the Unit hallway by RM #401. C. On 08/15/24 at 4:43 pm during a 400 unit observation, a bedside commode (portable toilet) was observed to be outside of RM #408, against the wall and below the hand rail. D. On 08/16/24 at 9:37 am during a 400 unit observation, a bedside commode (portable toilet)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (R #7 and R #9) of 4 (R #5, #7, #8 and #9) residents when staff: 1. Did not provide care or assess R #7 for several hours upon admission. 2. Did not offer R #7 hydration or a snack for several hours upon admission. 3. Nursing staff did not obtain physician orders for R #9's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC; a long, thin tube that is inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) line care, monitoring, and dressing changes. 4. Nursing staff did not provide PICC line care, monitoring, and dressing changes for R #9 until R #9 was discharged from the facility If the facility is not providing care, hydration, or assessing a resident after an admission, then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's face sheet revealed R #7 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths and showers by the facility staff for 5 (R #5, #8, #9, #10, and #11) of 5 (R #5, #8, #9, #10, and #11) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: R #5: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #5's care plan dated 06/13/24 revealed the following: - Focus: Resident/Patient requires assistance, was dependent for ADL care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, and toileting related to recent illness, fall, hospitalization. - Interventions: Arrange resident environment as much as possible to facilitate ADL performance. C. Record review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, and the facility failed to ensure the medical records for residents were accurate and complete for 2 (R #1 and R #7) of 2 (R #1 and R #7) residents randomly selected and reviewed when staff failed to ensure residents' medication was available and documented they administered prescribed medications when the medications were not available or when resident refused. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff confusion as to when or if residents have consistently received prescribed medications and if residents are receiving their intended medication effectiveness. The findings are: Findings for R #1: A. Record review of R #1 Medications Administration Record (MAR), dated August 2024, revealed staff documented they administered the following medications: - Breyna inhaler [budesonide (a bronchodilator)/formoterol (a steroid); generic; an inhaled medication to expand lungs and airway.] Give two puffs inhaled orally, two times a day. - On 08/01/24 thru…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's belongs were safeguarded from loss for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) residents reviewed for personal property when they failed to offer R #2 a safe place for her belongings until after theft occurred. This deficient practice is likely to result in unaccounted property for the resident and family resulting in frustration. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's complaint narrative investigation report, dated 07/12/2, revealed R #2 reported on 07/12/24 that a check in the amount of $800.00 was missing out of her dresser. C. Record review of R #2's complaint narrative investigation report, dated 07/12/2, revealed Facility Actions: Business Office Manager (BOM) immediately reviewed resident trust account and found the check was cashed on 07/05/24 via mobile deposit into a bank account. The BOM immediately notified the facility's bank and filed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper infection control practices for 2 (R #5 and R #6) of 2 (R #5 and R #6) residents reviewed for wound care when staff failed to: 1. Change gloves after cleaning a wound and before placing a clean bandage on wound. 2. Ensure clean bandages and gloves did not touch a non-clean surface (bed, bedside tray table). 3. Dispose of soiled bandages in a receptacle for items that contained biohazards waste. If the facility is not using proper infection control practices the residents are likely to acquire infections. The findings are: Findings for R #5 A. On 08/14/24 at 1:32 pm, observation of wound care for R #5 revealed the following: 1. LPN #2 placed the clean bandages on R #5's bedside table (a non-clean surface.) 2. LPN #2 did not change her gloves and perform hand washing after cleaning R #5's wound and before she applied the clean bandages from R #5's bedside table to the wound. Findings for R #6 B. On 08/14/24 at 2:30 pm observation of wound care for R # 6 revealed the following: 1. The Wound Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's Power of Attorney (POA) before transferring 1 (R #5) of 2 (R #5 and R#1) residents to a different facility. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident's POA not being aware of the resident's location. The findings are: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred on 03/01/24. B. Record review of a progress note for R #5, dated 02/29/24, indicated R #5 exited the back door, and staff spotted him walking around with his front-wheel walker. Facility staff brought the resident back into the building and asked R #5 about going outside. R #5 stated, I was just going to get some fresh air. The resident was placed on one-to-one observation until he was transferred out to another facility with a secured locked unit on 03/01/24. C. On 03/25/24 at 11:30 am, during an interview with the Guardian for R #5, she stated, the resident called her on 03/01/24 and that is when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to discard food after it reached its shelf life or after it expired. This failure was likely to affect all 122 residents listed on the census provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/16/24. This deficient practice could likely lead to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) in residents if food is not being discarded timely. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24 at 8:22 am, an observation of the kitchen revealed the following: - A container of limes dated 12/26/23 and a container of lemons dated 12/22/24. Both containers of the fruits appeared old, brown in color, and moldy. - A large container of something, that looked like pudding, did not have a date. - Desserts on the cart uncovered and did not have a date. - Deli ham opened and did not have a date. - Six gallons of whole milk in the refrigerator had an expiration of 02/10/24. B. On 02/12/24 at 8:32 am, during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), she confirmed staff should have thrown out the container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was homelike, free of clutter and broken items for residents eating in the dining room and living on 100 hall. This deficient practice could likely result in any of the 122 residents identified on the facility census provided by the Center Nursing Executive on 02/12/24 feeling like their environment was filled with unusable items that needed to be disposed of, causing frustration. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24, at 8:30 am, an observation was made of boxes up against the glass side panel of the door, and a hospital bed sat to the left of the boxes. Further observation revealed an old transport van was used to store unusable items, such as beds, other furniture, and old supplies. The van had tumbleweeds and trash around and under it. B. On 02/12/24, at 12:35 pm, an observation of the outside patio area off of the dining room revealed several pieces of broken furniture, side tables, chairs, a bed, and a medication cart all on the patio area. C. On 02/12/24, at 12:41 pm, during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 5 (R # 26, 55, 84, 102, and 165) of 5 (R #26, 55, 84, 102, and 165) residents sampled for nutrition and skin issues, when staff failed to: 1. Maintain accurate weights for R #26, R #84, and R #165; 2. Float the resident's heels per physician orders while in bed for R #102. 3. Ensure a resident on dialysis received a meal per physician orders prior to leaving to their appointments for R #55. These deficient practices could likely result in resident nutrition not being accurately assessed, causing a potential for weight gain or weight loss to go unnoticed, the deterioration (worsening) of overall health and well-being of residents, and places the resident at risk of developing a pressure sore which could lead to infection. The findings are: Accurate Weights R #26 A. Record review of R #26's weight log revealed staff documented the following weights: - On 02/01/24, 157.2 pounds (lbs). - On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for 2 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs; CNA #1 and CNA #2) of 3 (CNA #1, CNA #2, and CNA #3) CNAs. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not maintaining the competencies to perform their daily tasks and may lead to inappropriate care, service, and a failure to meet the needs of all residents. The findings are: A. On 02/16/24 at 10:27 am, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated she did not have an annual performance evaluation for CNA #1 and CNA #2. She said CNA #1 and CNA #2 were overdue for an annual performance evaluation. She stated the previous Human Resource staff member did not keep track of annual evaluation due dates.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the medication carts did not contain loose medications. 2. Ensure expired supplies were not kept with unexpired supplies in the medication room. These deficient practices are likely to result in all 31 residents residing in hall 200, as identified on the census list provided by the facility Administrator on [DATE], receiving expired medication and having expired medical supplies used in their treatments. The findings are: Findings for loose medications found in medication carts. A. On [DATE] am at 8:25 am, during observation of the 200 hall medication cart, one yellow oval tablet was loose, under the medication cards (vertical cardboard and foil cards pre-filled with prescription medications for easy storage and dispensing) in the drawer of the cart. B. On [DATE] at 8:26 am, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she stated loose medications should not be in the medication cart under the medication cards. Findings for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to follow dietary orders for double entree's and include all items on the resident's meal ticket for 1 (R #105) of 1 (R #105). The findings are: Resident #105 A. Record review of R #105's meal ticket, dated 02/14/24, stated R #105 was to receive double entrees for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. B. On 02/12/24 at 12:15 pm, during observation of R #105's meal tray, he received a single entree and not a double. The resident received the same amount of entree as the other residents at his table, and those residents received single portion entrees. C. On 02/14/24 at 12:47 pm, during observation of R #105's meal tray, he received one entree of chicken fried steak, instead of the two. According to his meal ticket, he was also missing green beans, milk, and margarine, which were on his meal ticket but not his meal tray. D. On 02/14/24 at 1:00 pm and 2:34 pm, during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), she stated R #105 should receive double entrees. The DM stated she put a note on the serving line to remind the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 (R #84) of 3 (R #'s 31, 55 and 84) residents reviewed for care plan revisions by not revising a care plan after there was documented significant weight loss for R #84. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the care or treatment needed to ensure their overall safety or ability to maintain their highest practicable well being. The findings are: Resident #84 A. Record review of Face Sheet for R #84 revealed an admission date of 8/01/23. B. Record review of Nutrition Progress Notes, dated 10/11/23 at 3:17 PM, for R #84 revealed significant weight change. Weight Changes: - 20.9%, lost 44 pounds (lbs) over thirty days. On 10/5/23, the resident weighed 166.7 pounds. On 9/4/23, the resident weighed 210.5 pounds. On 8/1/23, the resident weighed 215.0 pounds. Will request reweigh to verify amount of weight loss. C. Record review of Weight Tracking form for R #84 revealed the following: - On 08/01/23 - 216.0 lbs; - On 09/04/23 - 210.5 lbs; - On 10/12/23 - 159.9 lbs; - On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quality care and treatment for 3 (R #84, 87 and 262) of 3 (R #84, 87 and 262) residents reviewed for appointments, activities of daily living (ADL) care, and following dietary orders to obtain weekly weights. This deficient practice could likely result in a resident not receiving the care and services that were ordered and did result in a resident feeling embarrassed and frustrated due to not being assisted to the bathroom and going in her brief. The findings are: Resident #87 A. On 02/15/24, at 3:30 pm, during an interview with R #87, she stated she requested the Unit Manger (UM) #1 to make an appointment with a pulmonary specialist (specializes in lung and breathing issues) at least four times. She stated the doctor had an order in for a pulmonary specialist appointment, and that it still has not been made. She stated that she was very upset. B. Record review of the physician order, dated 12/27/23, indicated an order to refer to Pulmonologist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment according to safety precautions and prohibitions for oxygen use for 1 (R #4) of 3 (R #4, R #20, and R #48) residents reviewed for respiratory care when staff failed to post caution and safety signs indicating the use of oxygen in the resident's room. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not recognizing that oxygen is being used in a resident's room, and this could result in a dangerous (able or likely to cause harm or injury) fire hazard (material, substance, or action that increases the likelihood of an accidental fire occurring). Resident #4 A. Record review of physician's orders for R #4 revealed the following orders related to oxygen use: Physician order, dated 02/08/24, oxygen at 1 to 6 liters per minute (L/min) via nasal cannula (flexible tubing that delivers oxygen from the source into the resident nose). B. On 02/12/24 at 11:20 am, during an observation, R #4's room door did not have a Oxygen in use sign posted. C. On 02/14/24 at 7:54 am, during an observation, R #4's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention measures when staff did not: 1. Wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE; protective clothing, face masks, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) before entering the room of a resident under covid precautions (set of measures to prevent the transmission of bacteria and viruses that are spread through respiratory liquid). This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infectious agents (viruses and bacteria) between the 28 residents in the 400 hall. The findings are: Findings: A. Review of the CDC guidance, titled Use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) When Caring for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19, dated 06/03/2020, health care workers shall wear N95 mask (a mask that filters at least 95% of airborne particles that have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 0.3 micrometers), face shield, or goggles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation , and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Serve food in a timely manner according to established meal times; 2. Maintain the holding temperature of cooked food (greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit) . These deficient practices are likely to affect all 119 residents listed on the census provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/03/24. These deficient practices could likely lead to: 1. Foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) if food is not held at a temperature outside the danger zone (the temperature range where bacteria grows at a rapid rate, between 40 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) and 140° F); 2. Residents feeling frustrated as they wait for meals to be served and/or receive cold food. The findings are: Food served in a timely manner A. Record review of New Mexico complaint #71278 revealed on 12/17/23, residents received breakfast at 11:40 am. B. Record review of the food menu, as posted in the dining room, revealed staff regularly served breakfast at 7:30 am. C. On 01/03/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left on a beside table in a resident's room for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident. This failure could likely result in resident injury if staff do not confirm residents take their medications. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's orders and electronic medical record revealed R #2 was not allowed to self-administer medications, and he was prescribed Lisinopril to be administered once daily in the morning. B. On 01/03/24 at 1:53 pm, during observation of R #2's room a pink tablet (identified as Lisinopril using the pill description and identifiers) sat on the resident's bedside table and not in a cup. C. On 01/03/24 at 1:54 pm, during an interview, R #2 stated sometimes the nurse waited until he took his medications before they left the room, and sometimes the nurse left before he took his medications. R#2 further stated the Lisinopril belonged to him. R #2 did not know how long the Lisinopril was on his bedside table or which nurse gave him the Lisinopril. D. On 1/04/24 at 10:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide pericare (the cleaning of a patient's private area) in a timely manner for 3 (R#1, R #2, and R #10) of 4 (R#1, R #2, R #10, and R #14) residents reviewed for brief maintenance. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling upset as they must sit in a soiled brief longer than expected. The findings are: Findings for R #1 A. On 01/03/24 at 9:28 am, during an interview with R #1's POA (Power of Attorney), she stated she was dissatisfied with the care R #1 received at the facility. She said she found the resident one morning (date unknown) with dried feces in his brief (disposable underwear). Findings for R #2 B. On 01/03/24 at 1:53 pm, during an interview with R#2, he stated he was dissatisfied with his care. The resident said one day (date unknown), a CNA changed his brief, because he had a bowel movement. The resident said later in the day he began to feel uncomfortable and itchy in his perineum (the area between the anus and the scrotum). The resident said he asked a nurse to check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at an appetizing temperature and were attractive and palatable (pleasant to taste) for 5 (R #'s 8, 14, 15. 28 and 31) of 5 (R's #'s 8, 14, 15, 28 and 31) residents reviewed for meal quality. This deficient practice reduces residents' ability to eat and enjoy meals, may decrease their quality of life, and they could likely lose weight. The findings are: Resident #14 A. Record review of the facility grievance book revealed R #14 wrote a grievance on 05/03/23 stating the food served by the facility staff was cold on multiple occasions, and it was tasteless. On the grievance, the dietary manager wrote she apologized for the cold food, and she would work closely with her staff to correct the issue. B. On 10/24/23 at 10:48 am, during an interview, R #14 stated they still received cold and tasteless food from the facility. Resident #15 C. Record review of facility grievance book revealed that R #15 wrote a grievance on 05/03/23 stating the food served by the facility staff was cold on multiple occasions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free of flies for 3 (R #26, 27 and 28) of 3 (R #26, 27 and 28) looked at for environment and pest control. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling frustrated and uncomfortable if the facility fails to maintain an effective management of flies in the building. The findings are: A. On 10/23/23 at 9:55 am during an interview with R #28, she stated there have been issues with flies. She stated the flies have not been controlled and have really been a problem. She stated they were so bad in her room that an unidentified Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) brought in the sticky fly strips for her and hung them up in her room. B. On 10/23/23 at 9:55 am, during an observation, R #28's room revealed two fly strips hung by R #28's bed. Both strips had a lot of flies stuck to the entire fly strip. C. On 10/23/23 at 10:57 am, during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated flies have been an issue in the building. RN #1 stated over the last couple of months the flies were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the process for monitoring medications in the treatment cart for all 30 residents residing in the 400 hall, as listed on the resident census on 10/20/23. This deficient practice could likely result in resident medications not being monitored and at risk for misappropriation. The finding are: A. Record review of New Mexico complaint #67860, dated 07/11/23, revealed a concern nursing staff did not perform a count of the narcotic medication during shift change. B. On 10/20/23 at 12:16 pm, during an observation of the 400 hall med cart, the narcotic book did not have a signature for the morning of 10/20/23. C. On 10/20/23 at 12:16 pm during an interview, RN #2 explained she did perform a count of the medications during shift change; however, she did not sign off on it in the narcotic book. D. On 10/20/23 at 12:30 pm, during an interview with the director of nursing (DON), she stated all treatment carts must be locked, and two nurses must sign-off on the narcotic count twice a day to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care for 1 (R #30) of 1 (R #30) resident reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident to not have her pain adequately controlled if she is not receiving all prescribed pain medications. The findings are: A. Record review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dashboard revealed R #30 was currently on hospice and staff were to call hospice for all controlled medications. B. Record review of the nursing progress notes for R #30, dated 09/06/23, indicated resident continues on bed bound with severe contractions to BLE (bi-lateral lower extremity) and BUE (bi-lateral upper extremity). Minimal assist with meals. Total assist with ADL's (activities of daily living). C. Record review of the current physician's orders indicated R #30 had an order for the following: - Oxycodone, 2.5 milligrams (MG) Three times per day at 7:00 am, 1300 (1:00 pm), and 1900 (7:00 pm) for pain last ordered 09/12/23. - Morphine 20 mg/milliliters (ML) Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents at risk of elopement (residents who have been identified as a danger to themselves if they exit the facility unattended) remained in the facility after a wander guard (a medical device/bracelet that alarms when residents attempt to exit the building) alarm was activated. This deficient practice affected 1 (R #6) of 6 (R #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) residents reviewed for elopement risk. This deficient practice could likely result in residents exiting the building unattended without the ability to return. The findings are: A. Record review of New Mexico complaint #68034, dated 07/19/23, revealed R #6 was assigned a wander guard but eloped from the building. B. Record review of R #6's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: - Insomnia (a sleeping disorder where individuals are unable to sleep at night), - Unspecified dementia ( a group of conditions-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to 114 out of 115 residents (one resident received nutrition via a feeding tube and took nothing orally). Specifically, staff failed to change gloves between tasks when serving meals; the dish machine area was unsanitary and not adequately maintained; refrigerator temperatures were too high; and food was not stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Findings include: Review of the Proper Hand Hygiene: Dining Services Employees checklist dated 2020 and provided by the facility revealed, Proper Glove Usage - Gloves are not meant to be used as a replacement for handwashing. They are only effective if proper handwashing is completed . You must wear gloves when: touching any foods (raw or cooked) without utensils . When to change or remove your gloves: when they are dirty, torn, damaged, discolored or contaminated . when changing tasks. Review of the Food Storage: Cold Foods policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area remained free of garbage to prevent the harborage of pests and rodents on three of three days in which observations were made during the survey. This had the potential to affect staff, visitors, and all 115 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Dispose of Garbage and Refuse policy dated August 2018 and provided by the facility revealed, All garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe and efficient manner . The Dining Services Director coordinates with the Director of Maintenance to ensure that the area surrounding the exterior dumpster area is maintained in a manner free of rubbish or other debris. 1. On 11/14/22 at 9:32 AM, the dumpster area was observed with the Dietary Manager (DM) and the area contained a significant amount of garbage/refuse as follows: multiple pieces of paper and cardboard, fourteen disposable gloves, a yogurt container, a face shield, numerous pieces of plastic, a partially eaten sandwich, several soda cans, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of resident council minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for residents attending the resident council, and for 11 (Resident (R)262, R68, R39, R8, R35, R53, R76, R85, R7, R91, and R38) out of 35 sampled and supplemental residents, creating the potential for dissatisfaction and decreased nutritional intake. Specifically, tray tickets were not followed; residents were served less food or smaller portions than what the menu/tray tickets called for. Foods were omitted without replacements being made. Findings include: Review of the Dining and Food Preferences policy dated September 2017 and provided by the facility revealed, Individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are identified for all residents/patients .The Dining Services Director, or designee, will interview the resident or resident representative to complete a Food Preference Interview within 72 hours of admission. The purpose of this interview will be to identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of resident council minutes, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the food was palatable for 10 (Resident (R)262, R9, R165, R68, R51, R100, R462, R43, R20, R263) out of 35 sampled and supplemental residents, and residents attending resident council meetings. Specifically, the food was poorly prepared, did not taste or look appetizing, and was not at an acceptable temperature when residents received their meals. Findings include: Review of the Food: Quality and Palatability policy dated September 2017 and provided by the facility revealed, Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature . The Dining Services Director and Cook(s) are responsible for food preparation. Menu items are prepared according to the menu, production guidelines, and standardized recipes. 1. Residents expressed concerns with the palatability of the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed adequate transmission-based precautions (TBP) to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) entered the rooms of residents (Resident (R) 25 and R33) out of six residents on TBP for COVID-19 without adequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE). These five CNAs were assigned to provide care to residents with COVID-19 and residents without. These failures placed the 21 residents and staff on the 400 unit at risk for transmission of COVID-19. The facility further failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was implemented when completing a dressing change for one (R9) out of one observation of a dressing change. Findings include: Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID Data Tracker website, accessed on 11/14/22 at https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker, the facility's community transmission rate of COVID-19 was high. During Entrance Conference with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of property for one (Resident (R) 68) of one resident reviewed for personal property was thoroughly investigated. This failure had the potential to contribute to a feeling of helplessness and anxiety over a lost wheelchair and further misappropriation of property in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R68's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: left and right leg amputations below the knee, dependence on wheelchair, morbid obesity, reduced mobility, anxiety, and depression. Review of R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/16/22, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed he scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. R68…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment assessed the pain status for one resident (Resident (R) 68) of 28 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to lead to a lack of adequate interventions to address and control the presence, location, intensity, and effects of R68's pain. Findings include: Review of R68's undated admission Record, found in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, osteoarthritis, anxiety, depression, bilateral leg amputations below the knee, and history of opioid and alcohol abuse. Review of R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date of 08/16/22, revealed he scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. R68 received a scheduled pain medication regimen but no non-medication pain interventions. Though the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to oxygen use directing measurable goals and interventions for one (Resident (R) 100) of a total sample of 35 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and the inability meet their maximum practicable level of functioning related to use of oxygen. Findings include: Review of R100's undated admission Record located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R100's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/10/22, located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab, revealed the resident used oxygen. Throughout the survey from 11/14/22 to 11/17/22, R100 was observed in her room on quarantine for a diagnosis of COVID-19. R100 was observed to receive oxygen continuously via nasal cannula during all observations. During an investigative review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (Resident (R) 68 and 99) of six sample residents reviewed for rehabilitation/restorative services received appropriate treatment and services as ordered to maintain, restore, or improve the functional ability This failure had the potential to lead to increasing disabling effects of chronic conditions for R68 and R99. Findings include: 1. Review of R99's undated admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lymphoma, malnutrition, repeated falls, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of R99's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the MDS tab of the EMR, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/19/22, documented he scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R99 required limited assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 35 sample residents (Resident (R)9) received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including personal hygiene, baths and/or showers. This failure had the potential to contribute to a lack of good personal hygiene and an overall sense of well-being. Findings include: Review of R9s undated admission Record located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R9's diagnoses included unstageable pressure ulcer to the left hip, stage 3 pressure ulcer of sacral region, protein calorie malnutrition, spondylosis with myelopathy (compression of the spinal cord) and spinal stenosis at cervical region, diabetes mellitus, falls, and weakness. Review of R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/31/22 located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R9 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure a physician's order was in place for the use of oxygen for one (Resident (R) 100) of a total sample of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. This failure placed the resident at potential risk due to no parameters of how much oxygen to administer, or if it needed to be continuous, or as needed. Findings include: Review of R100's undated admission Record located in the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension, asthma, and history of lung cancer. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was added to the record on 11/08/22. Throughout the survey on 11/14/22 at 2:30 PM, 11/15/22 at 9:49 AM, and 11/16/22 at approximately 9:00 AM, R100 was observed in her room on isolation related to COVID-19. She was using oxygen via a nasal canula at 2 liters/minute Review of R100's October 2022 and November 2022 O2 [Oxygen] Saturation records, located in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMMIT CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/25/2007 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/25/2007 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUMMIT CARE PARENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2013 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| GREENBERG, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/22/2025 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| TITUS, TIFFANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/22/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $681K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325042. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.