No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Belen Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

1831 Camino Del Llano, Belen, NM 87002 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (505) 864-1600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
711 Christopher Rd · (505) 569-8015 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
701 Dalies Ave · (505) 859-2283 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
707 S Main St
Park
305 Eagle Ln · (505) 966-2700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1928 Fellowship Way · (505) 864-2305

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.0%11.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.5%2.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.1%11.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.7%14.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.5%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.8%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.7%22.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%15.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.161.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.362.811.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.5%CMS range 47.4–69.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.611.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
54.0%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-18)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's guardian and the physician of blood sugar fluctuations for 1 (R #298) of 2 (R #34 and R #298) residents reviewed for insulin use and blood sugar management. If the facility is not monitoring for blood sugar fluctuations, then residents are likely at risk of serious harm or death. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's policy Change in Condition: Notification of, last revised 06/01/21, revealed A center must immediately inform the resident/patient (hereinafter patient), consult with the patient's physician, and notify, consistent with his/her authority, the patient's Health Care Decision Maker (HCDM), where there is: . A significant change in the patient's physical, mental, or psychosocial status . A need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue or change an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment). B. Record review of R #298's face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident for several weeks about a significant health-related test result for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident. Failure to provide timely notification of a significant health related finding is likely to result in delayed awareness, frustration, and may contribute to delayed or inadequate treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/18/26 with the following diagnoses: Ileostomy (a surgical procedure in which the last part of the small intestine (ileum) is connected to the abdominal wall and an opening (stoma) is created in the abdominal wall created to allow waste to leave the body).Scoliosis (abnormal side-to-side curvature of the spine).Fibromyalgia (chronic muscle pain).[NAME] disease (autoimmune disorder that attacks the thyroid). B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes, dated 04/27/26, revealed R #1 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] after experiencing a change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident who requires colostomy (a surgical procedure in which the colon is connected to the abdominal wall and an opening (stoma) is created in the abdominal wall created to allow waste to leave the body) care, when the facility nursing staff were unaware of the expectations for colostomy bag (a pouch attached to the body that collects fecal waste) care and insisted R #1 could perform her own colostomy care. If the facility does not provide care consistent with professional standards for a resident with a colostomy, residents are likely to experience frustration from not receiving the care they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/18/26 with the following diagnoses: Ileostomy (a surgical procedure in which the last part of the small intestine (ileum) is connected to the abdominal wall and an opening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident involving an unwitnessed fall with potential injury was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for incidents. This failure compromised the State Agency's ability to triage and investigate allegations promptly, which may impact the overall effectiveness of the facility's abuse prevention system.The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy revised on 11/14/25, revealed the facility prohibits neglect and requires immediate reporting, investigation, documentation, and follow-up of alleged injuries including injuries of an unknown source. The policy defines neglect as failing to provide care or services necessary to prevent harm and directs the center to: Initiate an investigation within twenty-four hours when the facility receives information about an injury or suspected neglect,Document interviews and findings in the facility tracking system,Notify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the filters on the ice machine were replaced timely. This failure had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. This deficient practice could likely cause pollutants to enter the water causing contamination and illness. The findings are: A. On 09/16/25 at 9:29 am, an observation revealed the filters of the ice machine had a replacement date of 04/24/25. There were two filters, and they had the same change by date. The instructions on the filters recommended changing the filters at least once per year. B. On 09/16/25 at 9:31 am, during an interview, the District Manager stated the Maintenance Director was responsible for changing and ordering the filters. C. On 09/19/25 at 11:45 am, an observation revealed the ice machine had the same filters with a replacement date of 04/24/25. D. On 09/19/25 at 11:56 am, during an interview, Maintenace Director stated the filters needed to be changed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to:-Follow proper infection control practices for handling laundry when staff failed to ensure- laundry was free from used sharps. If staff fail to handle used laundry, then residents could be at risk of development and transmission of disease and infections.- Demonstrate its measures to minimize the risk of Legionella (bacteria naturally found in water that can cause a severe type of lung infection called legionnaires' disease when people inhale tiny water droplets containing the bacteria) in the building's water system, when the Water Management Program (WMP) team failed to develop and implement an adequate LWMP. This deficient practice is likely to lead to outbreaks of legionellosis (legionnaires' disease and Pontiac fever, a milder flu-like illness).These failures had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings are: Sharps in the Laundry A. Record review of the facility's Needle Handling and Sharps Injury Prevention policy, last revised on 04/15/23, showed shaving razors must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record and interview, the facility failed to allow a resident to choose the time wound care would take place for 1 (R #123) of 1 (R #123) resident. This deficient practice could likely contribute to the resident not receiving wound care, which could cause the wound to worsen or become infected. The findings are:A. Record review of R #123's medical record indicated R #123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:-Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs),-Chronic pain,-Anxiety,- Depression,- Chronic sacral (the portion of the spine between the lower back and the tailbone) pressure ulcer (PU; an injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). B. Record review of R #123's physician orders, dated 08/12/25, revealed an order for wound care to the coccyx (tail bone). Apply triad paste (helps with wound care) mixed with Collagen particles (collagen particles are effective in promoting wound healing by enhancing tissue regeneration) to wound. Do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment when staff failed to: - Maintain the dining room in a homelike manner.- Maintain resident rooms and bathrooms in good repair.-Maintain a resident bathroom free of flies.This failure had the potential to affect all residents who utilized the dining room and all residents in eight resident rooms. If the facility does not ensure resident rooms and common areas are clean, free from pests, and maintained in good repair, then residents are at risk of decreased quality of life, pest infestation, and injury due to unsafe environmental conditions. The findings are: Dining Room A. On 09/15/25 at 8:25 am, observations revealed the following: - Seven fluorescent light bulbs located around the walls were burnt out. - One chandelier bulb was burnt out. - All four walls had scuff marks with missing paint. - Several slats were missing from the wooden blinds in the windows. B. On 09/19/25 at 1:30 PM, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference to F755 Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) for 2 (R #55 and R #73) of 2 (R #55, and R #73) residents. Staff administered 26 medications with three errors resulting in a medication error rate of 8.6%. If staff administer medications in error, then residents are likely to experience less than optimal results from their medication regimen (a prescribed systematic form of treatment for a course of drugs).The findings are: R #73 A. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated [DATE], showed the following: - Medications were administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. - Medications to be given on an empty stomach or before meals were to be scheduled for administration thirty minutes to two hours prior to meals. - Medications were administered within sixty minutes of scheduled time unless otherwise specified by the prescriber. B. Record review of R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect a treatment cart (a movable piece of equipment used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense treatment supplies and tools) from unauthorized access when staff failed to lock the treatment cart while staff were away from the cart. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents on the 200 Unit. If staff fails to lock an unsupervised treatment cart, then residents could obtain medical equipment which could result in injury or death.The findings are:A. On 09/18/25 at 9:01 AM, during an observation of the 200 Unit, the treatment cart top drawer was opened, and the contents were exposed. Staff were not present in the area near the treatment cart. Further observations revealed the treatment cart had wound care dressing, wound cleanser, tweezers, barrier cream, irrigation solution, and scissors. B. On 09/19/25 at 9:10 AM, during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN)#1 stated he was responsible for the unlocked and opened treatment cart. RN #1 stated he stepped away to assist a resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's dietary preference for 1 (R #12) of 1 (R #12) resident. If the facility failed to serve a resident a vegetarian diet, then resident might receive meat and feel unheard and unimportant.The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's admission Record, dated 09/16/25, revealed an admission date of 05/02/2022 with the following diagnoses:-Type II diabetes mellitus. (DM; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin).-Morbid obesity. (severely overweight).-Legally blind (a significant and permanent loss of vision). B. Record review of R #12's admission Diet Order, dated 05/22/22, revealed regular diet, vegetarian, no eat eggs, and no meat. C. Record review of R #12's Care Plan, dated 09/02/25, revealed the following:- Consistent carbohydrate diet (a consistent amount of carbohydrates to help manage blood glucose levels).- The care plan did not address a vegetarian diet, no meat, and no eggs. D. Record review of R #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep accurate and complete resident records for 2 (R #97 and #123) of 2 (R #97 and #123) residents. This deficient practice could likely cause confusion about the resident's care the resident based on the documentation presented in the resident's electronic medical record. The findings are: R #97 A. Record review of R #97's face sheet revealed an admission date of 04/19/24 with the following diagnoses:- Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),-Osteoarthritis (condition caused by wear and tear of the joints causing loss of range of motion and pain with movement),-Chronic pain,-Left femur (long bone that connects the hip to the knee) fracture. B. Record review of R #97's After-Hour Encounter note (a note written by the provider not during regular business hours) revealed the following:- Dated 06/10/25 at 9:00 am, R #97 had a fall sometime between 06/10/25 at 9:00 pm and 06/11/25 at 1:00 am. - Dated 06/11/25 at 1:00 am, R #97 had a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I Identification Screen accurately reflected the resident's diagnosis of major depressive disorder for 1 (R #9) of 1 (R #9) resident. If the facility does not ensure PASARR screenings are completed accurately, then residents with serious mental illness may not receive required evaluations or specialized services, placing them at risk for unmet mental health needs and a decline in psychosocial well-being.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Pre-admission Screening for Mental Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability Patients policy, revised 02/16/24, revealed the Social Worker or designated staff will assure all patients with mental disorders and intellectual disability received appropriate pre-admission screenings according to Federal and State regulations. The policy stated if a PASARR was not completed or was incorrect, then Social Services would coordinate with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to send a resident out to the hospital in a timely manner after the resident had a fall with pain and possible injury for 1 (R #97) of 1 (R #97) resident. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident to be in pain longer than necessary. The findings are: A. Record review of R #97's face sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses.-Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),-Osteoarthritis (condition caused by wear and tear of the joints causing loss of range of motion and pain with movement),-Chronic pain,-Left femur (long bone that connects the hip to the knee) fracture. B. Record review of R #97's After-Hour Encounter note (a note written by the provider not during regular business hours) revealed the following:- Dated 06/10/25 at 9:00 am, R #97 had a fall sometime between 06/10/25 at 9:00 pm and 06/11/25 at 1:00 am. - Dated 06/11/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a residents specialized air mattress was properly inflated for 1 (R #12) of 1 (R #12) resident. If the facility fails to ensure the residents' air mattress was properly inflated, then the resident could be at risk of entrapment or of development or worsening of a resident's pressure ulcers.The findings are:A. Record review of R #12's admission Record, dated 09/16/25, revealed an admission date of 05/02/22 with the following diagnoses:-Reduced mobility (decreased ability to move the body independently).-Legally blind.-Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin).-Morbid obesity (severely overweight). B. Record review of R #12's Provider Orders, dated 07/22/25, revealed the following:-Specialty mattress. (a mattress designed to prevent or treat pressure injuries (bedsores) by reducing or redistributing pressure on the skin) -Alternating air mattress (a therapeutic or specialty mattress that contains air cells which automatically inflate and deflate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly maintain respiratory care equipment for 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6) residents when staff failed to date R #6's oxygen humidifier (to moisturize dry oxygen). If staff fail to date oxygen humidifiers, then residents could be at risk of serious infections. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Oxygen Policy, last revised on 08/07/23, showed the following:- If oxygen humidifier was used, staff should label with date.- Staff should replace disposable oxygen setup (equipment used for oxygen administration) every seven days. B. Record review of R #6's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF; impaired heart function) and anemia (low red blood cell count). C. Record review of R #6's Provider Orders showed the following:- Dated 07/28/25, an active order to administer oxygen at two liter/minute through a nasal cannula to keep oxygen above 90 percent (%),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference to F759. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services (the direct, responsible provision of medication-related care) were met when staff failed to dispose of medication after it was completed for 1 (R #55) of 1 (R #55) resident. If staff fail to dispose of completed medications, then residents could be at increased risk of medication errors, receive unnecessary treatments, and medication could be diverted. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Disposal of Medications Policy, dated January 2024, showed the following:- If a prescriber discontinued a medication, the medication container was removed from the medication cart as soon as practicable according to State and Federal regulations in a timely manner.- Medications awaiting disposal or return were stored in a locked secure area designated for that purpose and separated from active orders until destroyed or picked up by the pharmacy staff.- Medications awaiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained routine dental care for 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6) resident reviewed for dental services, when the facility failed to provide documentation to show R #6 received routine dental services at least annually. If staff fail to arrange for residents' dental services, then it could lead to untreated tooth decay (damage to tooth surface), gum disease, and other oral health issues like bad breath, tooth sensitivity, and tooth loss. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Dental Services policy, dated 11/28/17 and last revised on 09/15/25, showed the following:- The facility provided or obtained, from an outside resource, routine and emergency dental services, to meet the needs of each resident.- Routine dental services meant an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental x-rays as needed, dental cleaning, and fillings (a treatment to repair a damaged tooth).- When necessary or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was maintained in safe operating condition for 1 (R #62) of 1 (R #62) resident. If staff do not maintain resident equipment, then residents are at risk of injury. The findings are: A. Record review of R #62's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 07/03/25, identified diagnoses of repeated falls, generalized muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. B. Record review of R # 62's comprehensive care plan, revised on 09/12/25, showed interventions for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL; personal care tasks such as bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, and mobility), transfers, locomotion, and mobility due to limited mobility. C. On 09/16/25 at 12:29 a.m., during an observation and interview, R # 62 sat in his wheelchair in the common area. The back bar across the wheelchair was not attached and hung on the left side. R # 62 stated his wheelchair was broken for an extended period of time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-07 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to inform residents and resident representatives in writing of a room change, including the reason for the change, when residents changed rooms due to a flooding event. for 8 (R #1-8) of 8 (R #1-8) residents that were moved. This deficient practice is likely to result in frustration and confusion for residents. The findings are: A. On 01/07/25 at 10:20 am during an interview with Nurse Manager (NM) #1, she stated the Managers were called into the facility because of the flooding on the 200 wing on 01/06/25. She stated the Managers were asked to assist in moving residents. She stated she assisted moving residents R #5 and R #3. She stated she did not call the residents' families or the resident representatives to inform them of the move or of the flooding issue. NM #1 states she was not aware if any staff called the families or resident representatives of R #1-8 to inform them of the move and flooding. B. Record Review of R #6's medical record revealed staff documented the following: - Dated 1/7/2025 at 11:15 am, due to water/ plumping issue,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff documented the medication refrigerator temperatures in the medication storage room. This deficient practice is likely to result in all residents living in the facility, as identified on the census list provided by the Executive Director (ED) on 06/24/24, receiving medication that has lost their potency or effectiveness due to not being stored at the proper temperature. The findings are: A. Record review of the medication storage room temperature log book for the medication #1 refrigerator, the medication #2 refrigerator, and the specimen refrigerator revealed staff did not document temperature recordings for the following dates: 1. 06/21/24 pm. 2. 06/22/24 am and pm. 3. 06/23/24 am and pm. B. On 06/24/24 at 10:28 am during observation of the medication storage room, the medication #1 refrigerator, the medication #2 refrigerator, and the specimen refrigerator contained insulin and other medications that required refrigeration. C. On 06/28/24 at 12:23 pm, during an interview with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received food according to their meal ticket for 3 (R #30, R #62, and R #64) of 4 (R #28, R #30, R #62, and R #64) residents reviewed for dietary services. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving enough food or food that was expected according to the menu. the findings are: R #62: A. On 06/24/24 at 10:26 am, during an interview with R #62, he reported I don't get enough food. I am supposed to get double portions. B. Record review of R #62's dietary meal ticket (an individualized description from the kitchen of what staff should serve a resident), dated 06/28/24, revealed the following: - Regular/liberalized diet. - Double portions of all items. - King Ranch Chicken casserole - two squares, dinner roll - two each, margarine - two each, sliced peaches - 1 cup, vanilla ice cream- 1/2 cup, assorted beverage - 12 ounces, house supplement - two each. C. On 06/28/24 at 12:30 pm, during an observation of R #62's meal tray, the meal tray did not match R #62's meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment in good condition when staff failed to repair a broken door knob for 1 (R # 52) of 4 (R #'s 10, 52, 100 and 168) reviewed for homelike environment. If the facility fails to maintain the building, then residents could feel uncomfortable in their environment. The findings are: A. On 06/27/24 at 12:51 PM during a random observation and interview with R #52, R #52's bathroom door did not have a doorknob and could not be opened. R #52 stated the doorknob was broken for several weeks, and he was not able to access his restroom. He stated he told the CNAs, and they were aware the doorknob was broken. B. Record review of R #52's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed that R #52 was continent and was able to toilet himself. C. On 06/28/24 at 10:21 am, an observation of R #52's room revealed the bathroom door did not have a doorknob. D. Record review of facility work order request #2920, dated 06/17/24, revealed a work order was submitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was accurate for 1 (R #37) of 1 (R #37) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not understanding and implementing the most appropriate interventions and treatments for the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of R #37's care plan, dated 06/04/24, revealed the following focus areas: - R #37 may not smoke per smoking evaluation, initiated 02/26/23, - R #37 may smoke with supervision per smoking evaluation, initiated 05/05/23. B. On 06/28/24 at 11:03 am during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated R #37 did not smoke nor did she have a history of smoking. She added the resident's care plan should not have either smoking statement listed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was accurately revised for 1 (R #37) of 1 (R #37) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not understanding and implementing the most appropriate interventions and treatments for the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of R #37's care plan, dated 06/04/24, revealed R #37 had an active urinary tract infection (UTI; an infection in any part of the urinary system, which includes the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra) and was at risk for sepsis, initiated 02/10/24. B. Record review of R #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 05/22/24, revealed the resident did not have a UTI in the past 30 days. C. On 06/28/24 at 11:03 am during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated R #37 had a UTI in February 2024 and has not had once since. She added that the care plan should reflect that R #37 was at risk for developing UTIs, not that R #37 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality by failing to obtain wound care orders for 1 (R #12) of 3 (R #12, 15, and 16) residents reviewed for pressure sores. If the facility does not get wound care orders, it could create confusion on what wound care should be provided, or the residents may not get wound care. The findings are: A. Record review of the admission history and physical (H and P) for R #12, completed on 12/14/23 indicated the following under skin: -Wound on L (left) heel and big toe of R (right) foot; -Stage 2 pressure wound (sore has broken through the top layer of the skin and part of the layer below wound is open and shallow and could have clear or yellow fluid) on sacrococcygeal (sacrum or tail bone). B. Record review of the face sheet for R #12 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a left heel wound and a wound on his right big toe. No documentation of a wound on his tail bone. C. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievance (complaints over something believed to be wrong or unfair) documentation included a summary of the investigation and findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns, and no resolution that consisted of education for staff, for 2 (R #2 and R #5) of 3 (R #2, R #5, and R #6) residents reviewed for grievances. The deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling unimportant and/or unsatisfied with the results of the grievance process. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's grievance book revealed: 1. A grievance filed by R #5, dated 07/11/23, revealed the record did not contain a summary of the investigation and findings results. The resolution was to consist of staff being educated on resident approach on 07/11/23. 2. A grievance filed by R #2, dated 08/02/23, revealed the record did not contain a summary of the investigation and the findings results. 3. A grievance filed by R #2, dated 08/23/23, revealed the record did not contain a summary of the investigation and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an injury of unknown origin for 1 (R #6) of 3 (R#2, R #5, and R #6) residents viewed during a compliant investigation. If the facility is not going to conduct investigations, they may be unable to ensure that residents are free from neglect and could likely result in residents being at risk for further injury. The findings are: A. Record review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, revised 10/24/22, revealed, Injuries of unknown origin will be investigated to determine if abuse or neglect is suspected. The investigation will be thoroughly documented with in risk management portal. Ensure that documentation of witnessed interviews is included. B. Record review of the facility's nursing progress note, dated for 07/16/23, revealed the resident's family member reported something was different about the resident's nose. C. Record review of the risk management documentation, dated 07/16/23, for R #6, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document a resident assessment when they received a report of a health status irregularity and to document observations of an identified health status irregularity. These deficient practices was found to affect 2 (R #2 and R #6) of 5 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #4, and R#6) residents reviewed for nursing assessments after a change in condition occurred. This deficient practice could likely result in: 1. Residents not being properly assessed and treated for new concerns and; 2. Staff not having information they need to provide, competent, comprehensive care, and services if vital information is missing from the assessments. The findings are R #2 A. Record review of a facility grievance, dated 07/18/23, R #2 stated, at approximately 1:00 am on 07/15/23, he started feeling numbness on his right side and told the nurse he wanted to go to the hospital. He stated the nurse told him that she needed to make a phone call. R #2 stated when the nurse hung up the phone,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY N. On 03/13/23 at 10:45 am, the following observations were made for the 100 hall: Observation made of 4 call lights on: room [ROOM NUMBER] for R #69 stated she had just turned her call light on. room [ROOM NUMBER] for R #59, she stated that her light had been on a long time. She stated that she needed to be changed. room [ROOM NUMBER] for R #28, her light was observed to be continuously on for 45 minutes. room [ROOM NUMBER] for R #46, his light was observed to be on for thirty minutes, when asked R #46 stated his light had been on longer than thrifty minutes and he needed his urinal dumped. O. On 03/14/23 at 12:05 pm, during an interview with Volunteer Ombudsman, he stated that he does hear complaints from the residents about call lights not being answered, but those complaints have gotten better. He stated that previously he had heard of residents waiting up to 45 minutes for a call light to be answered. He stated that they are staffed with more CNA's than he had seen so he knows they have been working on it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This is a repeat citation. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain menu options by not following the menu and not placing all menu items on a resident's meal tray. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 103 residents identified on the census list provided by the Administrator on 03/06/23 and could likely result in reduced food intake, weight loss, and a decline in a resident's psychosocial health (the health of someone's emotions, behaviors, and social abilities) due to developing feelings of frustration, anxiety (an excess feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and disappointment. The findings are: A Record review of the lunch menu for 03/07/23 revealed the items to be served for lunch were a sloppy joe on roll, seasoned potatoes, mixed veggies, potato wedges, and pineapple crisp with whipped topping. B. On 03/07/23 at 11:27 am, during a observation of the lunch meals on the dining room tables, the pineapple crisp desserts were observed to be missing the whipped cream topping. C. On 03/09/23 at 10:13 am, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not: 1. Ensuring food items in the refrigerator/freezer and dry storage room were dated and labeled. 2. Ensuring that packages of dry food items were closed after opening. 3. Ensuring that dented cans were removed from the to use shelf. 4. Ensuring food in bulk, dry storage bins were dated and labeled. 6. Daily monitoring/logging of food temperatures at meal times. 7. Daily monitoring/logging of water temperature and chemical sanitizer strength on the three- compartment sink log. 8. Ensuring that the plastic display/housing of a digital thermometer does not touch the food item being measured. 9. Covering all food items on a resident's meal tray being transported through the facility for in-room dining. These deficient practices could lead to foodborne illnesses that could affect all 103 residents identified on the alphabetical census list, provided by the Administrator on 03/13/23, who eat food prepared in the kitchen. The findings are: A. On 03/06/23 at 9:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were aware of and/or understood the risks and benefits of medication they were receiving for 3 (R's #25, 37 and 78) of 3 (R's #25, 37, and 78) residents by not informing residents of why a medication was being prescribed and administered and what diagnoses/condition it was treating. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling anxious and potentially receiving unnecessary treatment/medication. The findings are: Findings for R #25 A. Record review of Face Sheet dated 01/07/23 for R #25 revealed an initial admission date of 10/28/22 and included the following diagnoses: Depressive Episodes (a period of at least two weeks during which a person feels sadness or loss of interest), Dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere with daily life) with Anxiety (feeling of uneasiness and worry), and Anxiety Disorder. B. Record review of Physicians Orders dated 10/31/22 for R #25 revealed, Cymbalta (medication used to treat depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff maintain the right for residents to preserve personal items for 2 (R #53 and 247) of 2 (R#'s 53 and 247) residents reviewed for personal items. This deficient practice is likely to cause the resident to feel that their personal possessions are not treated with respect. The findings are: R #247 A. On 03/07/23 at 1:12 pm, during an interview with R #247, it was reported that he had verbally reported missing clothing items (unknown staff members). R #247 stated that magically the laundry will bring you clothes that you know are not yours. Its like its their attempt to replace your stolen items with other items. He stated that he is missing pant's. He said when they didn't replace them, laundry came with other pants and they didn't find my pants but laundry wanted me to have them so they gave them to me. They didn't fit. R #247 could not recall how long ago he reported the pants missing or who he had reported it to. R #53 B. On 03/08/23 at 10:38 am, during an interview with R #53, he reported missing clothing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility to ensure the MOST forms were complete for 8 (R #s 25, 53, 57, 58, 62, 63, 88, and 247) of 12 (R #s 25, 53, 57, 58, 62, 63, 69, 73, 79, 88, 197 and 247) resident's records reviewed for Advanced Directives (legal documents that allow you to spell out your decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) the Medical Orders For Scope of Treatment (MOST) form were: 1. Signed by a physician for R #25, 57, 58, 88, and 247 2. Signed by a resident/Power of Attorney (POA) for R #63 3. Present in R #53 and 62 's records. This deficient practice is likely to affect resident's fulfillment of their end of life medical choices and could result in unnecessary suffering for the resident. The findings are: Findings for R #88 A. Record review of R #88's face sheet revealed admission date 08/10/22. B. Record review of R #88's the MOST form dated 12/19/22 revealed R #88 MOST Form was not signed by a physician as required. C. On 03/07/23 at 2:14 pm, during an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to file a grievance for 2 residents (R #53 and #247) out of 2 (R #53 and #247) residents reviewed for personal property. This deficient practice could likely cause residents frustration at not getting their clothing back from the laundry or seeing other residents wear their clothing and that their grievance wasn't taken seriously. The findings are: R #247 A. On 03/07/23 at 1:12 pm, during an interview with R #247, it was reported that he had verbally reported missing clothing items (unknown staff members). R #247 stated that magically the laundry will bring you clothes that you know are not yours. Its like its their attempt to replace your stolen items with other items. He stated that he is missing pant's. He said when they didn't replace them, laundry came with other pants and they didn't find my pants but laundry wanted me to have them so they gave them to me. They didn't fit. R #247 could not recall how long ago he reported the pants missing or he had reported it to. R #53 B. On 03/08/23 at 10:38 am, during an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission for 3 (R #s 25, 62, and 91) of 8 (R #'s 25, 37, 40, 57, 62, 63, 85, and 91) residents reviewed for Baseline Care Plans. This deficient practice could likely result in a decline in the residents condition due to staff not being aware of needed care and/or residents not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. The finding are: Findings for Resident #25: A. Record review of Face Sheet dated 01/07/23 for R #25 revealed an initial admission date of 10/28/22 and included the following diagnoses: Encounter for Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Digestive System, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Skin (type of skin cancer), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) with Diabetic Polyneuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes), Anal Fissure (a small tear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement (put into place) a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (R #s 20, and 40) of 7 (R #s 20, 25, 40, 57, 62, 63, and 247) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff's failure to understand and implement the needs and treatments of the residents. The findings are: Resident #40 A. Record review of Face Sheet dated 10/25/19 for R #40 revealed this as an initial admission date. B. Record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) (MDS - tool used to assess the health and needs of nursing home residents) dated 11/01/19 for R #40 revealed, Section L - Oral/Dental Status: No natural teeth or tooth fragment(s) (edentulous - lacking teeth) . Section V- Care Area Assessment (CAA) Summary: Dental Care triggered for Care Plan . Location and Date of CAA Documentation: Care Plan in Place. [there is no care plan] C. Record review of Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] for R #40 revealed, Section L - Oral/Dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Findings for R #37 N. On 03/07/23 at 12:33 pm during an interview, R #37 stated, I have had to wait up to three hours for someone to answer my call light and change me after I had a bowel movement. I also waited one time from 5:00 pm until 4:00 am to be changed, I sat in a urine soaked depends for almost 12 hours. They are not cleaning me completely, I've had to call my husband to come and clean me down there because they don't clean me completely. I got a UTI (urinary tract infection - infection of any part of the urinary system) from waiting so long to be changed. O. Record review of Care Plan dated 03/01/23 for R #37 revealed, Focus: [name of R #37] is incontinent of urine with potential for improved control or management of urinary elimination. Goal: Resident will demonstrate improved urinary elimination control as evidenced by experiencing less than ___ episodes of urinary incontinence perday. Interventions: 1) Administer supplement as ordered. 2) Encourage resident to consume all fluids during meals. Offer/encourage fluids of choice. 3) Facilitate easy access to bathroom with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer vision services for 3 (R #55, R #66, and R #299) of 4 (R#'s 55, 66, 298, and R #299) residents reviewed for vision needs. This deficient practice could likely result in an increased frustration and decreased enjoyment for the resident in daily life. The findings are: Findings for R #66: A. Record review of R #66's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed that R #66 was admitted on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnosis: expressive language disorder (a lifelong condition that impacts the ability to use language to express your own ideas when speaking). B. On 03/08/23 at 10:49 am, during an observation, it was noted that R #66 was wearing his glasses on his face and the right temple of his frame was no longer attached to his glasses. C. On 03/08/23 at 10:49 am, during an interview with R #66, he confirmed that he would like new glasses. Findings for R #299: D. Record review of R #299's EHR revealed that R #299 was admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to arrange foot care services for 2 (R #3 and R #61) of 2 (R #3 and R #61) residents reviewed for toenail overgrowth. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling uncomfortable due to: 1. Appearance and/or feel of toenail overgrowth; and 2. Accidental scratching. Findings for R #3: A. Record review of #3's face sheet revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the pertinent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a chronic disease that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). B. On 03/07/23 at 2:20 pm, during an observation of R #3, it was noted that her toenails had grown past her toes. C. Record review of physician orders, dated 02/08/21, revealed Podiatry, Dental and Ophthalmology Obtain as needed Consult and treatment for patient health and comfort. D. On 03/13/23 at 11:37 am, during an interview with the Social Services Assistant (SSA), she confirmed that R #3 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 3 (R #'s 3, 6, and 66) out 4 (R #'s 3, 6, 53, and 66) residents were seen within 60 days. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the required medical assessment in a timely manner. The findings are: Findings for R #3: A. Record review of R #3's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed that R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed that the last time she was seen by a physician was 01/03/23. Findings for R #66: B. Record review of R #66's EHR revealed that R #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed that the last time he was seen by a physician was 01/10/23. Findings for R #6: C. Record review of R #6's EHR revealed that R #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed that the last time she was seen by a physician was 01/03/23. D. On 03/13/23 at 12:11 pm, during an interview with Medical records clerk, when asked if she has a role in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to properly store medications in the medication carts for all the residents on the 200-unit hallway (residents were identified by the Matrix provided by the administrator on 03/06/23) when they failed to store loose medications. This deficient practice could result in residents obtaining medications not prescribed for them and resulting in adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects. The findings are: A. On 03/07/23 at 2:24 PM, during an observation of the medication cart on 200 Hall, revealed 1 white medication tablet was on the bottom of the cart. B. On 03/07/23 at 2:28 PM, during an interview CMA (Certified Medication Aide) #1, confirmed the white medication tablet was loose on the bottom of the cart. CMA #1 stated they usually check the carts at the beginning of their shift. C. On 03/07/23 at 3:34 PM, during an interview, the DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed that any loose medications should be discarded, and that CMA's and nurses are supposed to check their carts at the beginning of each shift.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This is a repeat citation. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the food was appealing and attractive for 5 (R #9, #19, #54, #70 and #94) of 5 (R #9, #19, #54, #70 and #94) residents sampled for food. This deficient practice could likely result in a decline in the psychosocial health (the health of someone's emotions, behaviors, and social abilities) of the residents due to developing feelings of frustration, anxiety (an excess feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and disappointment and could likely result in resident weight loss, if resident refuses to eat what is served. The findings are: A. On 03/06/23 at 11:29 am, during a dining room observation, it was observed that the main entrée for the lunch meal was a burrito made with whole pinto beans with shredded cheese in a white flour tortilla which was folded over (single fold) in half, not rolled. There was a small side salad of diced tomatoes and chopped iceberg lettuce. The presentation was observed to be unappealing as there were no other items on the plate. The color of both the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately document resident information related to Activities of Daily Living (bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating) for 4 (R #'s 46, 53, 84, and 148) of 5 (R#'s 3, 46, 53, 84, and 148) residents reviewed for documentation. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving showers as preferred and/or staff being unaware of resident needs due to a lack of documentation. The findings are: Findings for R #53: A. On 03/07/23 at 1:16 pm, during an interview with R #53, he explained that he has not had a shower in weeks. B. Record review of R #53's shower sheets located in the shower sheet binder revealed that the most recent shower sheet that was available was dated 12/28/22. He did not have any recent shower sheets in the binder. C. Record review of tasks located in R #53's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed that for the last 30 days, there was one entry relating to if he showered and what type of assistance was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) of 2 (R #28 and R #84) of 2 (R #28 and R #84) residents reviewed for isolation precautions to prevent the spread of C. difficile infection (CDI- a germ that causes diarrhea and an inflammation of the colon) for all residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Center Executive Director on. This failure increased the risk of transmission of CDI to other residents, and staff by: 1. Staff failing to perform hand hygiene between each resident encounter. 2. Staff failing to ensure they were donning (putting on personal protective equipment {PPE}when entering the room, and doffing (took off PPE) when leaving the room. 3. Staff failing to correctly perform hand hygiene when exiting a room with contact precautions. These deficient practices are likely to result in the spread of infections and illnesses. The findings are: A. Record Review of facility policy titled 18.0 Contact precautions revision date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to track and monitor the vaccination status for 3 (R#'s 25, 31, and 60) of 5 (R#'s 25, 31, 37, 60, and 298) residents reviewed for Pneumococcal (lung infections are caused by bacteria with illness range from mild to severe) and/or Influenza (infectious viral disease usually affecting the upper respiratory system, sinus, throat and large airways in lungs) vaccines. This deficient practice could likely result in increased Pneumococcal and Influenza related infections amongst residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy, titled IC 601 Pneumococcal Vaccination revised 11/15/22 revealed, in adherence with current recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization practices (ACIP) as set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) .Upon admission, obtain the pneumococcal vaccination history on all residents. Document the resident either received the pneumococcal vaccinations on the resident's MAR (Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions for 1 (R #36) of 1 (R #36) resident reviewed for physical environment by housekeeping not cleaning the residents floor properly leaving smeared juice and food on the floor. If the facility fails to maintain resident rooms in a homelike environment, then residents are likely to feel uncomfortable and could exacerbate (make worse) health issues. The findings are: A. On 03/06/23 at 2:48 pm, during an observation of R #36's room it was noted that R #36's floor was dirty with food and was sticky from spilled juice. B. On 03/06/23 at 2:49 pm, during an interview with R #36, stated, When housekeeping was finished mopping my floor this morning (03/06/23) they did not clean the floor properly. The floor was left sticky to walk on and food was still on the floor after being cleaned. C. On 03/06/23 at 2:54 pm, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 confirmed that the R #36's floor was dirty with food and sticky with juice.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #78) of 6 (R #9, R #12, R #30, R #51, R #69, and R #78) residents observed for medication administration. This deficient practice could likely lead to the resident having adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects. The findings are: A. On 03/07/23 at 09:29 AM, during an observation of medication pass for R #78, CMA (Certified Medication Aide) #2 administered Metoprolol Tartrate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg (milligrams). CMA #2 documented R #78's blood pressure (force of blood on the walls of the blood vessels that carry oxygenated blood away from the heart to the tissues) as 116/66 and heart rate 64 (number indicating the times a heart beats per minute). B. Record review of R #78's orders revealed: Order date 04/04/22 Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 25 MG. Give 25 mg by mouth one time a day for HTN (Abbreviation for hypertension/high blood pressure) Hold if HR (heart rate) < (less than) 65 bpm (beats per minute) AND/OR SBP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for 1 (R #247) of 1 (R #247) resident reviewed for bed positioning. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident experiencing a fall and discomfort. The findings are: A. Record review of R #247's face sheet revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnosis of: hemiplegia [paralysis on one side of the body] and hemiparesis [muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body] following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (paralysis on one side of the body as a result of a stroke), acquired absence (amputation) of right leg below knee, contracture in left knee (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. B. On 03/08/23 at 10:34 am, during an observation of R #247, it was observed that his bed was left in a high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #25) of 1 (R #25) resident reviewed for behavioral health concerns was receiving necessary behavioral health care to meet the resident's need. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident not to receive the mental health care and treatment that she may need to ensure her the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings are: Resident #25 A. On 03/08/23 at 1:44 pm during a random observation and attempted interview, R #25 appeared out of it, she was constantly confused and was unable to appropriately answer questions. R #25 was in and out of sleep during interview. B. Record review of Face Sheet dated 01/07/23 for R #25 revealed an initial admission date of 10/28/22 and included the following diagnoses: Depressive Episodes (a period of time, at least two weeks, when a person feels depressed or loses interest in things they generally enjoy), Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep residents free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (a medication that works by adjusting the number of major chemicals in the brain) for 1 (R #87) of 1 (R #87) resident sampled for unnecessary medications, when they: 1. Continued to administer Trazodone (used to treat depression, it is a type of medication called a serotonin modulator that works by increasing the amount of serotonin, a natural substance in the brain that helps maintain mental balance), a psychotropic medication to a resident with a documented refusal and declined consent to psychotropic medication treatment, and 2. Failed to monitor medication effectiveness by not notifying the physician of the resident's repeated refusals of psychotropic medication. These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving unwanted psychotropic medications, residents being administered medications they do not need, residents experiencing potential adverse side effects, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SUMMIT CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/25/2007
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/25/2007
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUMMIT CARE PARENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2013
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/15/2022
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
NOYA, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
WILSON, EMMANUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$588K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 2%Other / private 13%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $588K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,072per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$375per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325068. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next