Red Rocks Care Center
3720 Church Rock Street, Gallup, NM 87301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (505) 722-2261 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.2% | 11.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 0.9% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 2.0% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.7% | 11.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.5% | 14.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.3% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.4% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.7% | 86.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.4% | 22.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.4% | 15.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 1.65 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 2.81 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.0%CMS range 39.5–57.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.8%CMS range 11.3–18.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.6–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.70 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 84.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe and functional environment throughout the facility and for 18 (RM's # 20, 22, 27, 41, 43, 46, 49, 50, 51, 54, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, and 76) of 19 (RM's #4, 20, 22, 27, 41, 43, 46, 49, 50, 51, 54, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, and 76) rooms observed when the facility failed to: Ensure the facility entrance wall was even and pain all facility walls that were unpainted.Repair broken trim around the heating/cooling unit and damaged floor tiles between resident beds, in room [ROOM NUMBER], 66.Repair seal around heating/cooling unit in room [ROOM NUMBER],66.Repair broken and uneven floor tiles in rooms 22, 41, 43, 45, 49, 50 and 51.Repair bathroom door frame trim in rooms 50, 54, 67, 68, 70 and 71.Repair baseboards in room [ROOM NUMBER].Ensure there were no lingering unpleasant odors throughout the facility.Repair of yellow expanding foal sealant in room [ROOM NUMBER].Repair of bathroom door with puncture hole in room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR; a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurate for 5 (R #5, R #27, R #55, R #66, and R #94) of 5 (R #5, R #27, R #55, R #66, and R #94) residents reviewed for PASRR accuracy. This deficient practice is likely to result in the facility not providing the services needed by residents who are identified in the screening process for additional care and services. The findings are: R #5 A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; a mental health condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to revise the plan of care following a confirmed change in condition for 1 (R #77) of 1 (R #77) resident reviewed for care plan revision when:R #77's care plan was not updated to include an orthopedic follow-up (evaluation and ongoing management by a bone and joint specialist to assess healing, treatment needs, and potential complications) and monitoring for safety and pain after R #77 returned from the hospital with a documented fracture requiring immobilization. This deficient practice likely to result in staff not having instructions to direct care, monitor changes, or implement safety interventions after a resident's injury or change in condition. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Person-Centered Care Plan Policy revised 09/15/25 revealed that residents have the right to be informed in advance of changes to the care plan, and the care plan must be revised after each assessment and upon changes in the resident's condition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medications in the facility medication cart and storage room by not: Ensuring the medication refrigerator (fridge) temperature log is being monitored routinely.Ensuring insulin (insulin is a natural hormone that turns food into energy and manages your blood sugar level) pens are dated when they are first used and dated 28 days after first use.These deficient practices are likely to result in expired medications and medical supplies being used in resident care resulting in residents being at risk of possible infections and not receiving the full benefits of medication. The findings are: A. On 12/01/25 at 11:38 am, observation of the locked medication room, the fridge temperature log form for the months of September through November 2025 were not complete. B. On 12/01/25 at 11:42 am, observation of the nurse medication cart revealed the insulin pens for R #'s 21, 36, 53, 56, and 72 were not dated with the date of first use and no date for when to discard after 28 days. C. On 12/01/25 at 11:42 am, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (R #3, R #55, R #71, and R #84) of 4 (R #3, R #55, R #71, and R #84) residents reviewed for infection control when: The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration. The facility failed to ensure urinary catheter tubing remained off the floor to prevent contamination. The facility did not implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as required for residents with indwelling devices (inside the body) and wounds. The facility did not have biohazard bins or trash cans available for staff to discard used/soiled PPE (personal protective equipment). These deficient practices are likely to result in repeated and ongoing exposure of residents to increased risk of infection, cross-contamination, and injury. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident or their representative were aware of a medication taken by the resident, which included the risks and benefits associated with that medication for 1 (R #14) of 1 (R #14) resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. If residents and/or their representative is not informed of the risks and benefits of each medication, then they are likely not able to make informed decisions. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Behaviors: Management of Symptoms policy, last revised on 09/15/25, revealed residents exhibiting behavioral symptoms will be individually evaluated to determine the behavior. Further review revealed when medication is ordered for behavioral symptoms, consent (from the resident or resident representative) is to be obtained. B. Record review of R #14's Face Sheet, revealed R #14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a group of conditions characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to submit the required five-day follow-up investigation results to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #77) of 1 (R #77) resident reviewed for incidents. If the facility is not submitting the summary of the facility's investigation to the State Agency, then the State Agency is unable to appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation. The finding are: A. Refer to F0610 for related findings.B. Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, revised on 11/14/25, revealed, the Administrator or designee is responsible for reporting findings of all completed investigations within five working days to the State Agency using the state online reporting system. The policy states the facility will report findings of all completed investigations within five working days to the State Agency using the state on-line reporting system or state-approved forms and further requires that subsequent reports be provided as often as necessary to inform the State Agency significant changes in the status of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for injuries of unknown origin and report the investigation findings within five working days for 1 (R #77) of 1 (R #77) resident reviewed for incidents. If the facility is not completing an accurate and thorough investigation and submitting the summary of the facility's investigation to the State Agency, then the State Agency (SA) is unable to appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy revised 11/14/25, revealed the facility prohibits neglect and requires immediate reporting, investigation, documentation, and follow-up of alleged injuries including injuries of unknown source. The policy defines neglect as failing to provide care or services necessary to prevent harm and directs the center to: Initiate an investigation within twenty-four hours when the facility receives information about an injury or suspected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive assessment completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for MDS assessments. This deficient practice is likely to result in the facilities failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the resident's needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Diagnosis of blindness, one eye,Diagnosis of acquired absence of eye (complete loss of the eyeball due to injury, disease, surgery, or other medical conditions). B. Record review of R #4's Quarterly MDS Section B: Hearing, Speech and Vision dated 10/27/25 was coded as the resident having adequate vision. C. Record review of R #4's Care Plan, dated 10/15/25 revealed the following: Resident is at risk for falls related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) for 2 (R #1 and #42) of 3 (R #1, #42 and #48) residents reviewed for baseline care plans, when: R #1's baseline care plan was incomplete and inaccurate due to the baseline care plan failing to include multiple diagnoses with interventions for R #1. A baseline care plan was not developed within 48 hours of admission for R #42. If the facility fails to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for residents, then staff may lack necessary guidance to provide appropriate care which could lead to an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that causes harm to a resident due to medical care or lack of medical care). The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an admission date of 08/27/25 and included the following diagnoses: Hepatic encephalopathy (a serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 (R #5 and R #38) of 2 (R #5 and R #38) residents reviewed for accidents and supervision when: The facility did not ensure staff maintained a safe room temperature, exposing R #5 and R #38 to 32-degree Fahrenheit (F) outside temperatures, when staff opened a window without consent and left the window open for an extended period of time. This deficient practice is likely to lead to residents experiencing avoidable accidents and/or injuries. The findings are: R #5: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment). B. Record review of R #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and coordination with the resident's dialysis provider for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) residents reviewed for dialysis. If the facility does not ensure consistent two-way communication with the dialysis center for every dialysis treatment, then the facility cannot ensure appropriate monitoring of the resident's dialysis-related condition, recognition of complications, or implementation of timely interventions. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Dialysis Policy dated 08/07/23 revealed facility nursing staff are required to complete ongoing assessments for the residents' condition and monitoring before and after dialysis treatments. B. Record review of R 4's face sheet revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Diagnosis of end stage renal disease,Dependence on renal dialysis. C. Record review of R #4's Care Plan, dated 04/22/23, revealed the following: Monitor dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a diet in accordance with physician orders for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for nutrition when:The facility did not ensure therapeutic dysphagia care (the clinical treatment of swallowing disorders using rehabilitative and compensatory interventions to improve swallowing function and reduce the risk of aspiration) was followed and sent R #4 to dialysis with food items (sandwich) inconsistent with his ordered renal/dysphagia advanced diet.Dietary staff and nursing leadership lacked awareness of and oversight over the contents of dialysis sack lunches, placing the resident at risk for aspiration and inadequate nutritional management. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact a resident's ability to eat, causing difficulty with swallowing during mealtimes. The findings are:A. Record review of R 4's face sheet revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: End stage renal disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate resident records for 5 of (R #'s 8, 37, 42, 90 and 95) of 5 (R #'s 8, 37, 42, 90 and 95) residents reviewed for accuracy of records by not: Ensuring weights were accurately documented for R #'s 8, 37, 42, and 90. Ensuring discharge documentation was updated and accurate for R #95. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not having the information they need to provide competent, comprehensive care, and services to residents. The findings are: R #8: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed an admission date of 11/08/23. B. Record review of R #8's weight tracking revealed the following: 11/01/2025, the resident weighed 214.5 pounds (lbs.). 12/01/2025, the resident weighed 253.5 lbs. C. On 12/04/2025 at 1:02 PM during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the documented weights for R #8 and stated R #8's one month weight gain appears to be an error and R #8 should be re-weighed immediately. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a functioning call light system that allowed residents to call for assistance for 5 (1B, 25A, 26A, 27A, and 29A) of 5 (1B, 25A, 26A, 27A, and 29A) resident rooms observed for call light functionality. If the facility does not have a functioning communication system, then residents are unlikely to get their immediate needs met by facility staff.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Call Lights policy, last revised on [DATE], revealed residents will have a call light or alternative communication device at each patient's bedside, toilet, and bathing room to allow residents to call for assistance when unattended. Further review of policy revealed staff will report problems with a call light or call system immediately to the supervisor and/or Maintenance Director and will provide immediate or alternative solutions until the problem can be remedied (examples include replacing call light, providing a bell or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to safeguard residents' personal health information when the facility mailed a notice of involuntary discharge to an unauthorized entity for 2 (R #3 and #4) of 3 (R #3, #4 and #7) residents. If the facility fails to ensure the confidentiality, security, and proper management of resident records, then residents are at risk of unauthorized persons accessing their personal and medical information. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's Notice of Involuntary Discharge, dated 03/06/25, revealed the facility sent the resident's notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in another state. The facility did not send the discharge notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in New Mexico. B. Record review of R #4's Notice of Involuntary Discharge, dated 03/05/25, revealed the facility sent the resident's notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in another state. The facility did not send the discharge notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in New Mexico. C. On 06/12/25 at 10:31 am during an interview, the New Mexico…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit a Five Day Report (a report sent to the State Survey Agency which includes the results of the facility's investigation into alleged violations) to the State Agency regarding allegations of neglect (the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress) for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) residents. If the facility does not submit follow-up reports, then the State Agency cannot assure the residents are safe and free of neglect. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Reportable Incidents and Conditions policy, dated 06/01/15, revealed the following: - Staff will report, review, and investigate all reportable incidents and conditions which occurred, or allegedly occurred, on the property and involved, or allegedly involved, a resident who received services. - The Executive Director, Resident Care Director, or designee will review all reportable incidents and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a copy of the planned Involuntary Discharge Notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 (R #3 and #4) of 3 (R #3, #4 and #7) residents. This deficient practice could result in residents being discharged without necessary advocacy or support from the Ombudsman's office. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's Notice of Involuntary Discharge, dated 03/06/25, revealed the facility sent the resident's Involuntary Discharge Notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in another state. The facility did not send the discharge notice to the New Mexico Long-Term Care Ombudsman. B. On 06/12/25 at 10:31 am during an interview, the New Mexico Long-Term Care Ombudsman stated she did not receive R #3's Notice of Involuntary Discharge, dated 03/06/25. C. On 06/12/25 at 12:46 pm during an interview, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated she sent R #3's Notice of Involuntary Discharge, dated 03/06/25, to the Long-Term Care State Ombudsman in the wrong state. R #4 D. Record review of R #4's Notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents or the guardians were aware of and understood the reason they took a medication, the risks, and the benefits of the medication for 2 (R #19 and R #66) of 2 (R #19, R #66) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the residents or their guardians are not informed of the risks of benefits of the medication, they are not able to make informed decisions. The findings are: R #19 A. Record review of R #19's physician's orders revealed an order for quetiapine fumarate oral tablet (used to treat certain mental/mood disorders), 50 mg (milligrams). Give one tablet orally at bedtime for agitation. Start date: 05/09/24. B. Record review of R #19's medical record revealed the record did not contain a consent form for quetiapine fumarate oral tablet, 50 mg. C. On 08/29/23 at 2:30 pm, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated R #19's medical record did not contain consent forms for quetiapine fumarate oral tablet, 50 mg, and staff did not monitor R #19's behaviors while taking the quetiapine from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 4 (R # 21, 63, 67 and 201) out of 4 (R # 21, 63, 67 and 201) residents reviewed when staff failed to replace the shower bed mattress that had a large hole all the way through the mattress which exposed the white pipe frame; to replace the curtain rods for multiple rooms; and to fix a broken door into the shower room. If residents do not have a homelike environment, they may become depressed and anxious about things in disrepair. The findings are: Shower bed mattress findings: A. On 07/22/24 at 2:02 pm, during an interview with R #67, she stated the shower bed she used for showers had a large hole in it. She stated the bed hurt her back when she lay on it, and the hole kept getting bigger. She stated it has been like that for months. B. On 07/24/24 10:41 am, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5, she stated the shower bed has been like this for probably a couple of months. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessments were accurate for 2 (R #70 and #84) of 2 (R #70 and #84) residents reviewed for accurate MDS Assessments. If resident assessments are not complete and accurate, the facility could misidentify clinical complications and fail to provide adequate care to treat the resident's medical condition. The findings are: A. Record review of R #70's admission MDS Assessment, dated 05/21/24, indicated the resident was not on dialysis. B. Record review of R #84's admission MDS Assessment, dated 07/16/24, indicated the resident was not on dialysis. C. On 07/22/24 at 12:11 pm, during an interview with the MDS Coordinator, she verified R #70 was on dialysis at admission, and staff coded his MDS Assessment inaccurately. She also verified R #84 was on dialysis at admission, and staff coded her MDS Assessment inaccurately.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (R #11 and R #66) of two (R #11 and R #66) residents had complete comprehensive care plans for their care, when staff failed to: 1. Include hospice on R #11's care plan. 2. Ensure R #66's care plans for delirium (a serious change in mental abilities that causes confused thinking and lack of awareness of surroundings), oral health, and use of psychotropic drugs (drugs that affect a person's mental state) were complete and included time frames. This failure had the potential to adversely affect staff's ability to implement preventative measures for the residents' health and well-being. Findings include: Resident #11 A. Record review of R #11's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 04/22/24, revealed the resident was on hospice. B. Record review of R #11's comprehensive care plan, dated 05/30/24, did not include R #11 was on hospice. C. Record review of R #11's physician orders showed R #11 started hospice on 04/12/24. D. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention measures when the facility failed to ensure the shower bed was free of a hole and several other cuts that exposed the foam for 4 (R #21, 63, 67 and 201) of 4 ( R # 21, 63, 67 and 201) residents that used the shower bed. Failure to replace items that required cleaning multiple times per day for infection control purposes could likely cause the spread of infections and illness to the residents who use the shower bed equipment. The findings are: A. On 07/22/24 at 2:02 pm, during an interview with R #67, she stated the shower bed she used for showers had a large hole in it, and it kept getting bigger. She stated it has been like that for months. B. On 07/24/24 at 10:55 am, during an observation of the shower room, the shower bed had multiple cracks on the shower bed mattress. The shower bed also had a large hole that went all the way through the mattress and exposed the pipe frame. The foam in the mattress was exposed in several places. The foam was a pourous suface that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer interventions as ordered for R #10. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident not receiving appropriate and timely pressure ulcer relieving interventions, which could result in wounds becoming worse. The findings are: Findings for R #10 A. Record review of R #10's electronic medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage 4 (pressure injuries that extend to muscle, tendon, or bone). This is not an all inclusive list. B. Record review of R #10's physician orders, dated 05/19/24, showed an order for a pressure-redistribution cushion to chair and a pressure-redistribution mattress to bed. C. Record review of R #10's physician orders from the wound clinic, dated 07/16/24, showed orders to offload (reduction or redistribution of pressure on a specific area to promote healing and prevent complications) patient every two hours, order a pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide podiatry (the medical care and treatment of the human foot) services for 1 (R #65) of 1 ( R #65) resident reviewed for toenail care. This deficient practice could likely result in functional decline, pain, and infections. The findings are: A. Record review of R #65's face sheet indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. She had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (when the body does not use insulin properly), morbid obesity (overweight), Guillan-Barre syndrome (a condition in which the body's immune system attacks the nerves. It can cause weakness, numbness or paralysis) and dementia (symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere with daily life). This is not an all inclusive list. B. On 07/21/24 at 6:45 pm, during an interview with R #65, she stated she needed her toenails cut and to see podiatry. She stated she requested this from the nursing staff for awhile now. C. On 07/21/24 at 6:45 pm, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to put a resident in her bed when she was asleep, and the resident slumped forward in her wheelchair for 1 (R #13) of 1 (R #13) resident viewed during random observation. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident to fall forward out of her wheelchair and get hurt. The findings are: A. On 07/24/24 at 10:45 am, an observation of R #67 revealed the resident was asleep in her wheelchair in room off of the nursing station. She was slumped forward in her chair with one of her arms hanging off the side of the chair and appeared that she may fall out of the wheelchair. B. On 07/24/24 at 11:00 am, observation of R #67 revealed the resident slumped forward and asleep in her wheelchair. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 and CNA #6 sat in the room with R #67, but neither CNA assisted R #67. C. On 07/24/24 at 11:03 am, during an interview and observation of CNA #5, the CNA did not answer any questions from the surveyor regarding R #67. CNA #5 got up and asked R #67 if she wanted to lay down in her bed. R #67 stated yes, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment for all 93 residents, as identified by the facility census provided by the Administrator In Training (AIT) on 12/26/23, by failing to maintain and replace water damaged and stained ceiling tiles. This deficient practice is likely to cause all residents in this facility to be exposed to environmental hazards and to not feel comfortable, which could likely affect their psychosocial well-being. The findings are: A. On 12/28/23 at 8:33 am, during an interview and observation, the Maintenance Director stated there was a ceiling tile that had mold. The tile was located at the nurses' station. During an observation of the ceiling tiles in the nursing station area, a ceiling tile was observed to have a circular stain approximately 2 feet in circumference. The center section of the stain was spongelike and black in appearance. The tile bowed out and curved towards the floor. During an observation, a 4 inch water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in good condition for 2 (R #101 and R #102) of 4 (R #101, R #102, R #104, and R #105) residents reviewed for homelike environment. This deficient practice could likely cause residents to feel they are not living in a comfortable environment, and they are not valued. The findings are: A. On 12/20/23 at 5:24 pm, during an interview, R #101's family member stated the beds in R #101's room were old. The family member also stated the door to the bigger cabinet in R #101's room and to the little cabinet were broken. She stated on the little cabinet, the whole door was broken. She stated she had not been to the facility in a while because it was depressing. B. On 12/27/23 at 9:00 am, an observation of R #101's and R #102's room, revealed the following: 1. A chest of drawers in the resident's room was missing a strip of the laminate veneer from the left, front face of the drawers, which measured approximately ¾ inch by 4 feet in size and left the press board beneath exposed. The chest of drawers was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised and updated for 1 (R #101) of 5 (R #101, R #102, R #103, R #104, R #105) residents reviewed for revised care plans. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: A. Record review of R #101's face sheet revealed R #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: - Neoplasm (a new and abnormal growth of tissue in some part of the body, especially as a characteristic of cancer) of uncertain behavior of the brain, infratentorial (the area of the brain located below the tentorium cerebelli); obstructive hydrocephalus (fluid buildup in the brain); - Adult failure to thrive; - Constipation, unspecified; - Unspecified astigmatism, bilateral (the front surface of the eye or the lens, inside the eye, is curved differently in one direction than the other in both eyes). - A diagnosis which indicated progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 3 (R #101, R #102, and #103) of 3 (R #101, R #102 and R #103) residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet resident needs due to missing or inaccurate records. The findings are: Findings for R #101: A. Record review of R #101's face sheet revealed the following: R #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] on hospice care (a type of health care that focuses on the relief of a terminally ill patient's distress and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs during the final stages of life) with the diagnoses of neoplasm (a new and abnormal growth of tissue in some part of the body, especially as a characteristic of cancer) of uncertain behavior of the brain, infratentorial (the area of the brain located below the tentorium cerebelli); obstructive hydrocephalus (fluid buildup in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Foley catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder and anchored by a balloon to allow the free flow of urine into an attached bag) care for 2 (R #1 and 2) of 3 (R #s 1, 2 and 3) residents found to have an indwelling (fixed in a person's body for a long time) Foley catheter. This deficient practice is likely to result in a resident's catheter becoming unclean and unsanitary leading to urinary tract infections (an infection in any part of the urinary system) and other diseases. The findings are: Resident #1 A. Record review of face sheet, dated 11/10/23, for R #1 revealed an initial admission date of 03/15/23 and included the following diagnoses: - Paraplegia (the impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities), - Peritoneal abscess (a collection of pus or infected material in the abdomen), - History of urinary tract infections (UTI - an infection of any part of the urinary tract), - Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to deliver consistently, and timely (to be prompt, be on time, and follow the times provided to the facility) lunch meals to 89 residents that receive trays in the dining rooms, and room trays, as identified on the facility matrix provided by Center Executive Director on 05/01/23. This deficient practice could potentially lead to resident frustration and hunger. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility posted times revealed that the following times for the meal pass. 1. Breakfast will be served at 7:30 am. 2. Lunch will be served at 12:30 pm. 3. Supper will be served at 5:30 pm. B. On 05/04/23 during an observation of the lunch meal pass, the following was noted. 1. Meal trays passed in the South dining room at 12:50 pm for a 12:30 pm mealtime. (20 min delay) 2. Meal trays passed on the North side dining room at 12:56 pm for a 12:30 pm mealtime. (26 min delay) 3. Meal trays arrived in the hallway at 1:15 pm for at 12:30 pm mealtime. (45 min delay) 4. Meal tray pass completed for hallway A, B, C and D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. Follow policy procedure for sanitizing (method of reducing or eliminating pathogenic agents, such as bacteria, on the surfaces of something) food preparation areas and; 2. Serve a room tray at safe food temperatures (hot foods should be held and served at 135 degrees Fahrenheit) These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving food that may be contaminated due to unsanitized prep surfaces and poor handling/serving of food trays served in resident rooms. The findings are: Findings related to sanitizing technique: A. Record review of the facility policy Cleaning and Sanitizing, not dated, revealed the following; Sanitizer solution should be tested for correct PPM (parts per million- the ratio of chemical to water) frequently . You must change your sanitizing solution every two hours or when it becomes soiled [dark, cloudy, or with debri] . B. On 05/01/23 at 11:05 am, during an observation of the kitchen prep area, sanitizer solution was observed in a bucket sitting on a nearby cart. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a residents care plan to reflect new diagnosis and treatment plans for 2 (R #15 & R #92) of 2 (R #15 & R #92) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in resident care not being closely monitored and managed to meet the needs of the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy Person Centered Care Plan, last revised 10/24/22, revealed the following: 4. A comprehensive person-centered care plan must be developed for each patient and must describe the following: 4.1 Services that are to be furnished; . 6.1 The care plan must be customized to each individual patient's preferences and needs. Findings for R #15: B. Record review of R #15's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for the following diagnosis: epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed and causes seizures- temporary abnormalities in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents maintained personal grooming for 2 (R #13 and 23) of 3 (R #13, 23 and 34) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/nail grooming. These deficient practices could likely affect the health of the residents, causing pain in their feet and issues with their shoes not being comfortable. The findings are: R #13 A. On 05/01/23 at 11:30 am, during an interview with R #13, he stated that he is not diabetic but needs his toenails cut. They don't cut them here and they are too long and it hurts when I have my shoes on. B. Record review of the physician orders indicated that an order on 10/21/22: Refer to Podiatry: Right Great toe nail dislocated. C. Record review of R #13's medical chart did not reveal that an appointment was made for podiatry. D. Record review of the physician orders indicated that an order on 01/03/23: Referral to Podiatry: to get toenails clipped. E. Record review of R #13's medical chart did not reveal that an appointment was made for podiatry. R #23 F. On 05/05/23 at 1:40 pm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician that nursing staff did not obtain and administer medications for 2 (R #48 and #92) of 3 (R #15, #48, #92) residents reviewed for medication regimen. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving medication as ordered for treatment of infection and disease. The findings are: A. Record review of job aid titled 5 Step Medication Order Quick Reference Guide, not dated, 1. Determine Time Next Dose Due . 2. Determine Estimated Delivery Time (EDT)- . If EDT is > [later that] time dose is due, go to next step. 3. Pull From On-site Inventory (eKit/Omnicell)- Determine if the med [medicine] is available on-site in the eKit or Omnicell. If not, go to next step 4. Urgent Action Needed -Call the prescriber to get the med changed to something in the Omnicell/eKit or call the pharmacy to request the med be delivered STAT [immediately]. Be sure to inform the pharmacy when the next dose is due . 5. Enter RMS Pharmacy Alert…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that glucometer's (a medical device to measure glucose {sugar} levels in the blood) utilized by the facility for more than one resident, was disinfected per manufacturer's instructions after each time one is used, for 2 (R #5 and R #10) of 17 (R #4,R #5, R #10, R #20, R #26, R #35, R #36, R #37, R #39, R #56, R #67, R #68, R #92, R #197, R #200, R #204, and R #205) residents that receive capillary (small blood vessels) blood glucose (CBG capillary blood glucose) monitoring with glucometers. Nursing staff should be doing hand hygiene before and after each resident. This deficient practice may likely result in the spread of infection agents (viruses and bacteria) between residents and or staff who utilize glucometers. The findings are: A. On 05/02/23 at 8:40 am, during an observation of Registered Nurse (RN) #1 checking R #5 CBG. RN #1 pulled glucometer from caddy without disinfect the glucometer before use. RN #1 did not perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves (putting gloves on), and after the CBG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that 1 [R #195] of 2 [R #74 and 195] residents reviewed for falls were free from accident hazards by not providing sufficient supervision for one resident. This deficient practice could likely result in injuries or hospitalizations. The findings are: Resident #195 A. On 05/02/23 at 2:04 pm during a random interview, an unknown CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) stated that R #195 has fallen a couple of times since being in the facility and she is now on 1:1 (requires one on one supervision). B. On 05/03/23 at 8:31 am during a random observation revealed R #195 was seated in her wheelchair. She was observed to have a C shaped bruise on the outer corner of her right eye. She was appropriately dressed and appeared clean and comfortable. C. Record review of Face Sheet dated 04/23/23 for R #195 revealed this as an initial admission date and included the following diagnoses: Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage (a type of bleed inside your head), Hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), Dementia (a group of symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a urinary and bowel incontinence assessment for 1 (R #15) of 1 (R #15) residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice could likely result in denying the resident of assessment and services that might restore normal bladder function and allow the resident to return to the highest practicable well being. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's policy Continence Management, last revised 06/15/22, revealed the following: Patients will be assessed for the need for continence management as part of the nursing assessment process. A urinary incontinence assessment and/or bowel incontinence assessment will be completed upon admission or re-admission and with a change in condition or change continence status (the ability to control movements of the bowels and bladder). Continence status will be reviewed quarterly (every 3 months) as part of the care plan process . 1. Identify patient's continence status and need for continence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly document the administration of a narcotic medication (a drug that produces analgesia, narcosis, and addiction. It is also known to produce euphoria in some people) for 1 resident (R #81) of 1(R #81) residents record of compliance of record keeping in the controlled substance log (A book that allows on coming nurses to count narcotics medications in the nursing cart). If the facility is not ensuring that controlled drugs are not appropriately documented at the time of administration, it could cause a narcotic medication discrepancy. The findings are: A. On 05/02/23 at 9:46 am, during an observation of med pass it was noted that the Controlled Substance book was missing a signature for 04/23/23 for R# 81. B. Record Review for R #81 physicians order revealed an order for LORazapam (abenzodiazepine used to treat anxiety disorders) 0.5 MG (milligrams) 1 time a day for Anxiety (Feeling nervous or tense. impending doom). C. On 05/02/23 at 09:26 am, during an interview with Certified Medication Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the the pharmacist recommendations, which were documented as responded to by the Center Nursing Executive (CNE) were followed through for 1 (R #74) of 3 (R #s 74, 94 and 197) residents sampled for drug (medication) regimen review (thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences [undesirable effects of medication]) by not completing a lab screening for INR levels (blood test that that determines how well a person is responding to Warfarin - a blood thinning medication). This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications that may have adverse consequences, receiving medications longer than needed or at a higher or incorrect dose. The findings are: A. Record review of Face Sheet dated 08/13/22 for R #74 revealed this as an initial admission date and included the following diagnoses: Long Term Use of Anticoagulants (blood thinning medications) and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (a condition where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that opened and accessed (if [NAME]-dose vial has been opened or accessed {e.g needle puntered} the vial should be dated with the last date that the product should be used {expiration date} and discarded with in 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different use by date) multi-use vials (a vial of liquid medication that contains more than one dose of the medication) were dated as to when they were initially opened/assessed, by nursing staff. 2) Ensure that expired medications were not stored with unexpired medications, that were readily available for resident use; and 3) Ensure that treatment carts are kept locked when not in use. These deficient practices have the likelihood to result in the 19 residents that were identified on daibetis list provided by the ADON on 05/05/02, to receive expired medications that have either lost their potency, or effectiveness; medications that were undated continued to be accessed and stored with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS OMG OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2018 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2018 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/01/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2018 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| ANYANHUN, GANDHI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| GREENBERG, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $566K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325070. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.