Embassy Of Winchester
36 Lehman Dr, Canal Winchester, OH 43110 · For profit - Corporation · 176 certified beds · (614) 834-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $264,882 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 27.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 10% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 87.7 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, review of the death certificate, policy review, and review of the National Institutes of Health guidance, the facility failed to ensure Resident #96 was monitored for acute respiratory failure when oxygen saturations went to 65 percent and failed to appropriately assess a resident's change in condition. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the serious life-threatening harm and death on [DATE] when Resident #96 exhibited a change in condition. Resident #96 was assessed with a low oxygen level (O2) of 65 percent and exhibited shortness of breath (SOB). At 1:34 A.M., Resident #96's 02 saturation was 91 percent with oxygen at four liters per minute (LPM). Registered Nurse (RN) #225 did not provide ongoing monitoring after the first vital signs with an O2 saturation of 91 percent to ensure Resident #96 was stable. From 1:35 A.M. to 3:09 A.M., there was no monitoring of Resident #96. At 3:14 A.M., EMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #79. Actual harm occurred on 08/10/23 when Resident #79, who was moderately cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure ulcer development and required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, developed an unstageable (Dead or devitalized tissue that is hard or soft in texture; usually black, brown, or tan in color, and may appear scab-like. Necrotic tissue and eschar are usually firmly adherent to the base of the wound and often the sides/ edges of the wound.) pressure ulcer to the right heel. There was no evidence of adequate and necessary interventions in place prior to the development of the ulcer. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of physician orders, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly store and date food items in the freezer. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Residents #28 and #56 receive no food by mouth. The facility census was 92. Findings include:Observations on 06/08/26 from 1:55 P.M. to 2:05 P.M. revealed the following items were opened and undated in the facility walk in freezer: three bags of country fried steak in plastic bag, a plastic bag of cauliflower, a plastic bag of cheese omelets, a plastic bag of chicken tenders, a plastic bag of unbreaded chicken breasts, and a plastic bag of french fries. The were also, a plastic zipper bag of hot dogs that had a faint date of 05/28/26, but the hot dogs were freezer burned. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #146 on 06/08/26 at 2:05 P.M. confirmed there were three bags of country fried steak in plastic bag, a plastic bag of cauliflower, a plastic bag of cheese omelets, a plastic bag of chicken tenders, a plastic bag of unbreaded chicken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach at all times for one resident. This affected one (Resident #21) of two residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 92 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy, anoxic brain damage, anxiety, and depression.Review of the care plan revealed Resident #21 required assistance with activities of daily living related to immobility with an intervention to keep the call light in reach while in bed, initiated on 08/27/25.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was rarely or never understood and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.Observations on 06/08/26 at 12:38 P.M. and 2:50 P.M. revealed Resident #21 was resting in bed. Resident #21's bed was positioned so that the right side was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, financial record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were handled appropriately and failed to prevent the mixing of resident's funds with facility funds. This affected two (Residents #25 and #89) of five resident financial records reviewed. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/19/26, revealed Resident #25 had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #25's transaction report, dated 07/31/25 to 06/11/26, revealed the report included Resident #25's Resident Fund Management System (RFMS) and resident qualified income trust (QIT)) accounts. There were several additional instances in a month where money was removed from these two accounts and it was marked for cost of living. These additional withdrawals were transferred out of these two accounts into the facility's 'cost of care' account.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a suprapubic catheter was provided preventative care to prevent potential complications of infection and possible dislodgement. This affected one (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 92 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder.Review of the physician orders dated 04/23/26 revealed an order for a suprapubic catheter 18 French (F) with 10 bulb to straight drain.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and had an indwelling urinary catheter.Review of the care plan dated 04/22/26 revealed Resident #14 had the potential for complications related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing per physician order for one resident. This affected one (Resident #3) of two resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 92 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively impaired and utilized oxygen therapy.Review of the care plan dated 01/27/26 revealed Resident #3 had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing due to COPD. Interventions included to change the tubing and humidifier weekly initiated on 06/04/26.Review of Resident #3's physician orders dated 06/04/26 revealed an order for oxygen: tubing and humidifier change every night shift every Thursday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with the parameters ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #34's physician orders dated 10/29/25 revealed an order for blood glucose monitoring one time a day every Monday and Wednesday, and to notify the physician if the blood sugar levels were less than 60 or above 200. There was an order for Prazosin two milligrams (mg) two capsules for nightmare disorder and to hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110. Additionally, there was an order for Metoprolol Succinate 50 mg for hypertensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's room had outlet covers to ensure the electrical wiring was covered. This affected one (#11) of 24 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Observation on 06/08/26 at 11:18 A.M. revealed Resident #11's room had a missing outlet cover with exposed electrical housing located above the resident's footboard directly above the resident's legs. The uncovered outlet was being used for a packaged terminal air conditioner located adjacent to the window.Observations on 06/09/26 at 11:34 A.M. and 4:15 P.M. revealed the outlet cover remained missing with exposed electrical still present in Resident #11's room.Observation on 06/10/26 at 10:20 A.M. revealed the outlet cover was still missing and the exposed electrical remained in Resident #11's room.Interview and observation on 06/10/26 at 3:40 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #448 confirmed Resident #11's outlet above the bed did not have a cover and exposed electrical was visible. CNA #448 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of Resident #71 during a Hoyer lift transfer. This had the potential to affect 14 residents who the facility identified as requiring the assistance of a Hoyer lift for transfers. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Findings include:Review of Resident #'71s medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23.Diagnoses include essential hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, osteoarthritis, contracture to right and left knee, need for assistance with personal care, unspecified dementia and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness.Review of Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/03/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. Review of Resident #71's functional abilities revealed Resident #71 is dependent for chair/bed-to-chair transfer.Review of Resident #71's care plan revised on 01/22/26 revealed Resident #71 needed assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), with a goal that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #71. This had the potential to affect 20 residents who the facility identified as requiring assistance with incontinence care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #'71s medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23.Diagnoses include essential hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, osteoarthritis, contracture to right and left knee, need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified dementia and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. Review of Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/03/26 a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. Review of Resident #71's functional abilities revealed Resident #71 is dependent on staff for assistance with toileting hygiene. Observation on 03/04/26 at 11:50 A.M. of incontinence care on Resident #71 completed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #97 revealed after the incontinence care was completed CNA #97 handed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to prepare and handle food in a sanitary manner. This affected 85 residents in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents who were nothing-by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 87.Finding include:Observation on 01/27/26 at 12:30 P.M. for lunch tray service revealed [NAME] #299 was not wearing a hair net while placing places into insulated plate base for lunch meal trays.Interview on 01/27/26 at 1:05 P.M. [NAME] #299 confirmed he did not wear hairnet during lunch service and was observed getting a hair net.Review of the facility's policy titled, Hair Restraints, not dated confirmed hair shall be restrained to prevent physical contamination of food. Hair restraints shall be worn by all employees while in the kitchen to cover all hair.Observation on 01/27/26 at 12:31 P.M revealed dietary manager #215 touching own face with hands on 01/27/26 at 12:35 P.M. and did not perform hang hygiene while serving trays during lunch tray service.Interview on 01/27/26 at 1:05…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, self-reported incident (SRI) investigation review, staff interview, and review of the facility's abuse policy and procedure, this facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse was submitted to the appropriate state agency as required. This affected two (Resident #410 and #510) of the three residents reviewed for sexual abuse. The facility census was 87. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #510 revealed an initial admission date of 07/31/2025 with a re-entry date of 08/20/2025 and a discharge date of 11/202/2025. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, mood disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #510's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of the nursing progress note dated 11/14/25 at 2:44 P.M. created by the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #374) of one resident observed during incontinence care . The census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #374's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/27/23. Medical diagnoses include unspecified dementia, moderate with psychotic disturbance, moderate-protein calorie disturbance, essential (primary) hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, atrial fibrillation, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, dysarthria and anarthria, low back pain, and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.Review of Resident #374's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/09/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15. Resident #374's functional abilities revealed Resident #374 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.Review of Resident #374's care plan dated 10/14/25 revealed Resident #374 always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and comfortable living environment for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 94. Findings include: An observation on 08/04/25 from 8:57 A.M. to 9:12 A.M. was conducted throughout multiple hallways and common areas. Upon entrance to the building, a large stain was noted on the ceiling tile above the second door on the right. In Hallway G, light fixtures two, six and seven contained debris and light shades on fixtures six and seven were cracked. Peeling ceiling drywall was observed after light fixture three. Outside Resident #74's room, the ceiling showed damaged paint and unfinished ceiling texture. Outside Resident #72's room, peeling ceiling was identified around the fire sprinkler and a ceiling stain was visible above the beauty shop door.Continued observation revealed in Hallway H, damaged drywall shaped like a removed hand sanitizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed accurately and a correction was submitted timely to reflect Resident #90's disposition. This affected one resident (#90) out of four residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 94.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 06/17/19, with diagnoses including hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, depression, polyneuropathy, chronic pain, dementia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), benign prostatic hyperplasia, acquired absence of the right leg above the knee, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of a progress note dated 03/02/25 revealed Resident #90 was enroute to a local hospital by critical transport, and the power of attorney was notified of the intended location.Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed on 03/02/25, revealed the discharge status was coded as discharge - return anticipated and marked as an unplanned discharge.Review of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing devices were free from soil. This affected one (Resident #33) out of three residents reviewed for pressure reducing measures. The facility census was 94. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 05/06/25 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, severe sepsis with septic shock, metabolic encephalopathy and a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left heel.Review of the care plan dated 05/07/25 revealed Resident #33 has an actual area of skin impairment with interventions including use of an air mattress, encouragement to wear boots on both feet, evaluation for pain, completion of wound treatments, nursing observation of the wound dressing to ensure it remains intact, monitoring for clinical changes in the wound and completion of skin observations on shower days and as ordered.Review of physician orders dated 05/08/25 revealed the resident is to wear boots on both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure name badges were worn at all times by facility staff. This affected all 93 residents at the facility. Facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation on 06/30/25 at 9:48 A.M. of Certified Nurse Assistant #1111 revealed no name badge present. Concurrent interview verified no name badge was present and has not had a permanent one since being hired. The temporary badges that are being used fall off a lot as they are just a sticker. Observation on 06/30/25 at 10:29 A.M. of Activities Aide #1000 revealed no name badge present. Concurrent interview verified that no name badge was present and had not had a permanent one since she lost it. Will obtain a temporary sticker one now. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:31 A.M. with Resident #301 revealed the staff at the facility rarely have name badges on. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:42 A.M. with Resident #302 revealed the staff at the facility rarely have name badges on and she can't keep them straight because of that. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:47 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled activities were completed as well as ensuring evening activities were scheduled. This affected 92 residents (except for Resident #233) who attend/participate in activities. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:31 A.M. with Resident #301 in the activities room revealed the facility rarely does the activities that are posted on the board and stated They just sit out stuff on the table for us to do on our own. No activities in the evening so he gets bored a lot. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:42 A.M. with Resident #302 revealed there are really never any activities occurring. There are items on the tables, but when it comes to the scheduled events, they rarely happen. There are no evening activities to do as well. She goes into the activities room a lot and can never find anyone with activities in there. Observation on 06/30/25 at 11:30 A.M. of the activities room revealed no move and groove activity being conducted as per schedule with a total of 9 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete staff performance evaluations as required. This had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents. Findings Include: Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #165 and CNA #179 personnel records found they did not have a completed 90 day performance evaluation completed. Interview with Visiting Administrator #600 on 12/04/24 at 10:30 A.M. confirmed they have no evidence to support the above staff had performance evaluations completed as required.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations , and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the steam warmer and two compartment sink was maintained in a safe and operating condition . This had the potential to affect 85 residents. The census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 12/04/24 at 10:24 A.M. of the kitchen's two compartment sink omitted a strong odor of sewage. The sink was empty. Verified by dietary Aide #105. Observation on 12/4/24 at 10:28 A.M. behind the serving line the steam oven was dripping water from the bottom left side of the door. The water dripped approximately 2 feet down to a 11 x 11 serving metal bin. [NAME] # 217 revealed when she uses the steamer the water drips out . The staff must empty the water filled bin every one to two hours. Dietician #168 verified the water and confirmed she reported the issue to corporate in November 2024. Interview on 12/04/24 03:16 P.M. with the Administrator regarding the steam oven, he confirmed it had been replaced once in the past. The maintenance man must change the seals to prevent the water from dripping. Interview on 12/05/24 01:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one resident (Resident #189) who had a feeding tube in place. The facility also failed to follow infection control procedures during wound care for two residents (Residents #81 and #300) and did not follow infection control procedures during catheter care for one resident (Resident #10). The deficient practices affected four residents (#10, #81, #189, #300) of four reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an initial admission date of 05/28/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, dependence on respirator, obstructive sleep apnea, bladder neck obstruction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, congestive heart failure, spinal stenosis lumbar region, hypertension and depression. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and resident council meeting notes the facility failed to document in writing its responses and rationale to resident council grievances and recommendations. This had the potential to affect eight (#1, #9, #24, #14, #42, #51, #58 and # 66) residents who attend the meetings monthly. The census was 88. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council monthly meeting minutes from 12/26/23 to 11/24/24 revealed old business issues are discussed with no details documented. The meetings do discuss any concerns the residents have and are listed in the meeting minutes, however, there is no documentation from administration of addressing the residents' questions and concerns. Interview on 12/4/24 at 3:29 PM with Resident Council President #42 reported she is not aware of any written responses to the questions and concerns voiced at Resident Council . It is her understanding Activity Director #182 takes care of all the details. Interview on 12/04/24 at 3:45 P.M. with the Activity Director #182 revealed they report concerns from Resident Council in stand up administrative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the opportunity to view or receive resident medical records in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #65) of one resident reviewed for medical record release. The census was 88. Findings Include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were end stage renal disease, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, anemia, gout, type II diabetes. other psychoactive substance abuse, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pure hypercholesterolemia, low back pain, neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, esophagitis, anxiety disorder, and allergic rhinitis. Review of facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician after a significant weight change occurred for Resident #66. This affected one (Resident #66) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 03/16/23 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy, and unspecified dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was rarely/never understood, and Section K triggered weight loss concerns without a prescribed weight-loss regimen. A brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 8 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #66's care plan included maintaining adequate nutritional status and addressing weight changes, with interventions including fortified foods twice daily and boost glucose control supplementation. Review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a timely and thorough grievance investigation and resolution for resident #9's grievances. This affected one (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for grievance handling. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on respirator/ventilator status, obstructive sleep apnea, essential hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, unspecified depression, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, generalized muscle weakness, and stenosis of a coronary artery stent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for residents. This affected three (#10,#18, and #69) of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure (CHF), depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 01/12/23 revealed the resident utilized a non-invasive ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure with hypercapnia and COPD. Interventions included keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy and procedure review the facility failed to invite residents' family and or resident representative to a residents' Care Conference. This had the potential to affect two residents (#50 and #70) . The census was 88 . Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 07/21/21 with sever cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, depression and anxiety. Resident #50 requires one person assist with activities of daily living. Review of Resident #50 Care Conference Summary on 07/11/24 revealed Resident #50's Health Care Power of Attorney was not invited to the care conference. Interview on 12/02/24 at 2:05 P.M. with Resident #50's family representative revealed she has not been invited to Resident #50's Care conferences. She confirmed she is the Health Care and Financial Power of Attorney. Interview on 12/04/24 with the Social Services Designee # 112 confirmed she has no documentation indicating Resident #50's representative had been invited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#10), who was dependent on staff received routine nail care. This affected one resident (#10) of four resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to COPD, severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, CHF, depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 11/03/22 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to new admission, weakness, depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for as needed pain medication administration. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for opioid use. Also, the facility failed to follow wound care orders. This affected one (Resident #70) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were end stage renal disease, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, anemia, gout, type II diabetes. other psychoactive substance abuse, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pure hypercholesterolemia, low back pain, neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, esophagitis, anxiety disorder, and allergic rhinitis. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure off-loading skin interventions were in place as physician ordered for one resident. This affected one resident (#10) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to COPD, severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, CHF, depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 11/03/22 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to new admission, weakness, depression, cognition. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding services were provided Resident #189. This affected one (Resident #189) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding services. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #189 revealed an admission date of 11/18/24 with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia, and other complex conditions. Review of Resident #189's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment indicated severe cognitive impairment and the need for maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including dressing, toileting, and mobility. Review of the physician orders for Resident #189 revealed orders to clean the peg tube site with normal saline and apply split gauze daily starting 11/19/24. Additionally, Enteral feeding was ordered once daily via PEG tube, with a specified rate of 50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure provision of appropriate equipment was at the bedside for immediate access for two residents (#9 and #69) and failed to ensure one resident's (#10) nasal cannula oxygen delivery equipment was dated. This affected three residents ( Resident #9,#10 and #69) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure (CHF), depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have all dialysis communication and records were in the facility to ensure full care could be provided. This affected one (Resident #65) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 88. Findings Include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were end stage renal disease, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, anemia, gout, type II diabetes. other psychoactive substance abuse, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pure hypercholesterolemia, low back pain, neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, esophagitis, anxiety disorder, and allergic rhinitis. Review of facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #65…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly monitor residents psychotropic medications to ensure the need/appropriate dose of psychotropic medications. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 88. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder, asthma, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dementia, lack of coordination, schizoaffective disorder, shortness of breath, osteoporosis, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease, moderate intellectual disabilities, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and diffuse traumatic brain injury. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7 physician orders found she was prescribed the following psychotropic medications: Olanzapine 15 milligrams (mg), Depakote 250 mg twice daily,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was completed for a medication as ordered for Resident #9. This affected one (Resident #9) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 2/15/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on respirator/ventilator status, obstructive sleep apnea, essential hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, unspecified depression, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, generalized muscle weakness, and stenosis of a coronary artery stent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly monitor resident behaviors to ensure the need/appropriate dose of psychotropic medications. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 88. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder, asthma, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dementia, lack of coordination, schizoaffective disorder, shortness of breath, osteoporosis, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease, moderate intellectual disabilities, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and diffuse traumatic brain injury. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7 physician orders found a new order for Olanzapine 15 milligrams (mg) for schizoaffective disorder was started on 11/18/24. Prior to this order, she was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely collection of a urine sample for a urinary tract infection (UTI) as ordered for Resident #81. This affected one (Resident #81) out of one resident reviewed for labs. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 5/28/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes, obesity, dependence on respirator, lack of coordination, obstructive sleep apnea, bladder-neck obstruction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, difficulty walking, edema, combined systolic heart failure, spinal stenosis, and several other chronic conditions. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (Additionally, a BIMS assessment on 12/02/24 with a score of 15), indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #81 was dependent on a wheelchair and required assistance with toileting, bathing, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#18) oral assessments were accurate and dental services were arranged to address the resident's poor dental status. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for dental. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an initial admission date of 08/07/24 with the most recent admission of 10/11/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, fibromyalgia, arthritis, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, obstructive sleep apnea, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, paraplegia, pain, constipation, osteoarthritis, dysphagia and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the plan of care dated 09/05/24 revealed the resident required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) related to fibromyalgia and paraplegia. Interventions included apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review,staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow their antibiotic stewardship processes for Residents #81 and #43. This affected two (Resident's #81 and #43) out of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 5/28/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes, obesity, dependence on respirator, lack of coordination, obstructive sleep apnea, bladder-neck obstruction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, difficulty walking, edema, combined systolic heart failure, spinal stenosis, and several other chronic conditions. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (Additionally, a BIMS assessment on 12/02/24 with a score of 15), indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #9 was dependent on a wheelchair and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer the influenza vaccine to one resident (Resident #20) and the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine to one resident (Resident #6) after the residents consented to receive the vaccinations. The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #6 and #20) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an initial admission date on 01/18/24 and a readmission date on 03/08/24. Medical diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus without complications, metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, essential hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Vaccine Administration Record Informed Consent for Vaccination dated 10/25/24 revealed Resident #20's representative consented for the resident to receive an influenza vaccine. There was no evidence in the medical record Resident #20 received the influenza vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility did not keep an accurate record of skin wound assessments in the medical record for one (Resident #101) out of three residents with skin wounds. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #101, revealed an admission date of 01/18/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, bacteremia, vascular dementia, and type 2 diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 out of 15 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. The resident was determined to not have a pressure ulcer but at risk for developing them. Review of the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #101 revealed no skin alterations for his left and right buttock and his groin area. Review of the skin observation dated 01/21/24 for Resident #101 revealed skin was intact with no new areas opened. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep clean drying dishware in a clean dry location and not exposed to dust or other contamination. This had the potential to affect 87 out of 88 residents who receive beverages from the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 11/13/23 at 11:27 A.M. revealed a recently cleaned rack of mugs and cups air drying on the end of the dishwasher line. Observed a ceiling tile with light pink insulation and dust hanging down from both ends of the ceiling tile and a ceiling vent next to the ceiling tile that was covered in dust. The tiles were above the clean rack of mugs and cups. Interview on 11/13/23 at 11:27 A.M. with Corporate Food Service Director #208 confirmed the ceiling area could be cleaner and there is pink dust at the end of the ceiling vents. Review of the undated Dish Machine Cleaning policy and the weekly Cleaning chart both do not indicate the area above where air drying is taking place.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to export resident assessments in a timely manner. This affected 16 (Residents #5, #16, #25, #35, #38, #39, #40, #44, #48, #50, #51, #52, #56, #67, #74, and #83) of 19 resident assessments reviewed. The census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were dementia, anemia, type II diabetes, depression, COPD, schizoaffective disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, schizophrenia, hypokalemia, aphasia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, altered mental status, and psychosis. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/06/23, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5 MDS assessments revealed the last assessment submitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) was on 07/06/23. The facility had started/completed the her most recent MDS on 10/06/23, but due to the electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was an appropriate smooth texture prior to serving to residents on a pureed diet and required surveyor intervention for safety. This had the potential to affect nine residents (Residents #7, #49, #39, #5, #75, #4, #81, #64, and #52) who were on a prescribed pureed diet. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 11/15/23 at 10:48 A.M. with [NAME] #117 revealed the cook was preparing pureed Italian blend vegetables. [NAME] #117 confirmed the menu for lunch was Italian blend mixed vegetables and barbeque chicken. The recipes were observed to the left of [NAME] #117 during preparation. Vegetables in the Italian vegetable mix include carrots, green beans, cauliflower, and broccoli. Dietary Manager (DM) #178 was present for observation. Observation and interview on 11/15/23 at 10:54 A.M. revealed [NAME] #117 stopped puree machine and stated the vegetable mix was the proper texture for serving to residents. The surveyor present tasted the vegetable mix for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately confirm one resident's (Resident #71's) code status. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the resident record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy, aphasia, seizures, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of the Durable Power of Attorney for Management of Property and Personal Affairs dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 named his wife to be Power of Attorney (POA) for finances only. There was not a POA for healthcare decisions named for Resident #71. Review of Resident #71's facesheet revealed the resident was his own responsible party and guarantor. Resident #71's wife was listed as an emergency contact only. Review of the admission Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess one resident's (Resident #71) cognition. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of one reviewed for appropriate cognitive status. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the resident record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date on 06/03/22. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy, aphasia, seizures, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had severely impaired cognition and scored two out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had severely impaired cognition and scored two out of 15 on the BIMS assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care for three residents (#33, #53, #61) in the area of contractures and antipsychotic medication use. This affected one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for contractures and two (Resident #33 and Resident #53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an initial admission date of 10/30/20 with the latest readmission of 06/12/22 with diagnoses including fracture of upper end of right tibia, severe morbid obesity, dependence on respirator, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis lumbar region, obstructive sleep apnea, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, pain, chronic respiratory failure, polyneuropathy, chronic allergic conjunctivitis, overactive bladder, gastro-esophageal reflux and on 06/01/22 the diagnoses of schizophrenia was added.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan to specifically address one resident's (Resident #71) cognitive status changes and whether or not a legal resident representative was needed for healthcare decision making. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the resident record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date on 06/03/22. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy, aphasia, seizures, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of the Durable Power of Attorney for Management of Property and Personal Affairs dated 01/24/22 revealed Resident #71 named his wife to be Power of Attorney (POA) for finances only. There was not a POA for healthcare decisions named for Resident #71. Review of Resident #71's facesheet revealed the resident was his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #239) vital signs were checked upon returning from dialysis treatments. This affected one resident (Resident #239) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #239 revealed and initial admission date on 10/24/23 and a readmission date on 11/03/23. Medical diagnoses included cognitive deficit deficit, end stage renal disease, and acute kidney failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #239 had intact cognition and scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #239's function level varied from supervision with eating to total dependence with personal hygiene. Resident #239 required maximal assistance with lower dressing, bathing, and toileting. Resident #239 did not require dialysis at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of pharmacy recommendations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address a pharmacy recommendation for one resident (Resident #33) and failed to provide a rationale for declining a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for two residents (Residents #28 and #33). This affected two residents (Residents #28 and #33) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date on 09/16/21. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, mood (affective} disorder, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 04/10/23 revealed Resident #33 received a current dose of Seroquel (Quetiapine) 75 milligrams once daily without an attempted Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR). The recommendation was to consider a GDR while monitoring for re-emergence of behavioral and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure parameters for when the physician should be notified were provided for one resident's (Resident #33) insulin orders. This affected one resident (Resident #33) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date on 09/16/21. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with neuropathy and chronic kidney disease, mood (affective} disorder, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders dated November 2023 revealed Resident #33 had the following insulin orders: Humalog Infection Solution inject five units subcutaneously at bedtime dated 06/22/23, Insulin Glargine Solution inject 20 units subcutaneously one time a day upon rise dated 07/29/23, Insulin Glargine Solution inject 30 units subcutaneously at bedtime dated 07/28/23, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medications for three residents (#28, #33, #53) and failed to monitor for side effects of antipsychotic medication use for one resident (#33). This affected three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an initial admission date of 11/27/17 with the most recent readmission of 01/23/18 with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, right sided hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, cardiomyopathy, dementia with mild behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychosis. Review of the plan of care dated 05/01/20 revealed the resident had potential for adverse side effects of psychotropic drug use, antidepressant, TBI and major depressive disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests for residents as physician ordered. This affected two (Resident #28 and Resident #53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an initial admission date of 11/27/17 with the most recent readmission of 01/23/18 with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, right sided hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, cardiomyopathy, dementia with mild behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychosis. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficit. Review of the monthly physician orders for November 2023 identified orders dated 02/10/22 Depakote level and liver function test (LFT), every three months,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain one resident's (Resident #239) wheelchair in proper working order. This affected one of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #239 revealed an initial admission date of 10/24/23 with the latest readmission of 11/03/23 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, retention of urine, end stage renal disease, dependence on hemodialysis and acute kidney failure. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. On 11/13/23 at 4:22 P.M., interview with Resident #239 revealed she had two different foot pedals to her wheelchair and the left foot pedal would not latch causing her legs spread when moved. Resident #239 revealed this caused her pain to her hips and legs. The resident revealed her transport driver who transports her to dialysis three times a week, as well as herself had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, observation, policy review, and review of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to meet the needs of the residents. This affected three (#38, #40, and #86) of three residents reviewed for activities. The census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 07/15/21. Resident #40's medical diagnoses included bipolar disorder, diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #40's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/03/23, revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Review of the activities care plan, dated 08/02/23, revealed Resident #40 needed encouragement to participate in activities and was dependent on staff for activities. Interventions included to encourage Resident #40 to participate in activities. Review of Resident #40's Record of One on One Activities, dated September 2023, revealed Resident #40 was documented as having a active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$264,882 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $97,587 — penalty dated 2026-06-22
- $167,295 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-07-11 for 21 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-15 for 80 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2020 |
| AARON HANDLER FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2020 |
| AH DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2020 |
| HANDLER, AARON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2020 |
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2020 |
| HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2020 |
| HUDSON, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| KUNAKA, KUDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $480K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 365644. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.