Embassy Of Winchester
36 Lehman Dr, Canal Winchester, OH 43110 · For profit - Corporation · 176 certified beds · (614) 834-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2021
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $167,295 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 27.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 87.7 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
81 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the unprecedented global pandemic that resulted in the Presidential declaration of a State of National Emergency dated [DATE], Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Memos, Nursing Home Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), review of facility policy and procedures, review of the facility floor plan, observations, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement effective and recommended infection control practices, including the implementation of appropriate isolation and quarantine procedures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when the facility failed to implement adequate infection control measures increasing the resident outbreak status of five residents (#22, #47, #61, #128 and #383) testing positive for COVID-19 on [DATE] to seven residents (#44, #52, #59, #64, #115, #384 and #482) testing positive for COVID-19 on [DATE]. Furthermore, Resident #128 who was COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of an emergency medical service (EMS) run report, facility Post-Mortem policy and procedure review, facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure review, staff interview, interview with Emergency Medical Service/Paramedic #545 and #546 and interview with Contracted Funeral Home Transport #543, the facility failed to provide adequate and immediate post-mortem care to Resident #128 following the resident's death in the facility on [DATE] resulting in neglect of the resident's corpse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, when on [DATE] at approximately 8:00 A.M. Resident #128's body was released to the funeral home without evidence of post-mortem care having been provided by facility staff. On [DATE] interviews with Contracted Funeral Home Transport #543, Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #542 and Anonymous Staff #544 revealed postmortem care had not been completed following the resident being pronounced deceased on [DATE] at 3:46 A.M. Resident #128 was found lying on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-11-05 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed record review, review of an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) squad run report, review of a staff witness statement, review of the facility emergency response policy, staff interview and interview with Paramedic (EMT) #545 and EMT #546, the facility failed to initiate timely and adequate Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for Resident #128 who was a full-code and required CPR after being found unresponsive and without vital signs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at approximately 3:21 A.M. when Resident #128 was observed unresponsive. The facility failed to ensure EMS had timely access to the facility and failed to provide CPR timely for the resident. On [DATE] at 3:21 A.M., EMS arrived on-site and identified facility staff were not providing CPR to a resident whom staff had identified as unresponsive and coding. EMS staff immediately initiated CPR for the resident, however CPR efforts were not successful and the resident expired. The lack of immediate and adequate CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #79. Actual harm occurred on 08/10/23 when Resident #79, who was moderately cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure ulcer development and required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, developed an unstageable (Dead or devitalized tissue that is hard or soft in texture; usually black, brown, or tan in color, and may appear scab-like. Necrotic tissue and eschar are usually firmly adherent to the base of the wound and often the sides/ edges of the wound.) pressure ulcer to the right heel. There was no evidence of adequate and necessary interventions in place prior to the development of the ulcer. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services, including orthotic/splinting devices for Resident #66 as ordered by the physician. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #66, who was severely cognitively impaired, quadriplegic and dependent on staff for activities of daily living when the resident was assessed to develop and sustain worsening contractures to her bilateral ankles, knees, and hips without evidence of proper interventions being in place to prevent the deterioration. This affected one resident (#66) of three residents reviewed for braces and splints. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 01/22/22 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, depression, injury at unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, anxiety, gastrostomy, dysphagia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, urinary tract infection, dysphagia, depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2021-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or assistive devices to prevent falls and/or resident injury. Actual Harm occurred on 10/31/21 when Resident #35, who required extensive assistance from two (plus) staff for bed mobility sustained a fall out of bed resulting in a fractured nose when State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #407 was providing bed mobility without a second staff member assisting. Actual Harm occurred on 10/07/21 when Resident #33, who was dependent on two staff for transfers sustained an injury/hematoma with increased excruciating pain and subsequent two week hospitalization with surgical intervention during a staff assisted mechanical (Hoyer) lift transfer. This affected four residents (#12, #33, #35 and #93) of six residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included schizophrenia, atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of Resident #71 during a Hoyer lift transfer. This had the potential to affect 14 residents who the facility identified as requiring the assistance of a Hoyer lift for transfers. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Findings include:Review of Resident #'71s medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23.Diagnoses include essential hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, osteoarthritis, contracture to right and left knee, need for assistance with personal care, unspecified dementia and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness.Review of Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/03/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. Review of Resident #71's functional abilities revealed Resident #71 is dependent for chair/bed-to-chair transfer.Review of Resident #71's care plan revised on 01/22/26 revealed Resident #71 needed assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), with a goal that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #71. This had the potential to affect 20 residents who the facility identified as requiring assistance with incontinence care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #'71s medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/23.Diagnoses include essential hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, osteoarthritis, contracture to right and left knee, need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified dementia and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. Review of Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/03/26 a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. Review of Resident #71's functional abilities revealed Resident #71 is dependent on staff for assistance with toileting hygiene. Observation on 03/04/26 at 11:50 A.M. of incontinence care on Resident #71 completed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #97 revealed after the incontinence care was completed CNA #97 handed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to prepare and handle food in a sanitary manner. This affected 85 residents in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents who were nothing-by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 87.Finding include:Observation on 01/27/26 at 12:30 P.M. for lunch tray service revealed [NAME] #299 was not wearing a hair net while placing places into insulated plate base for lunch meal trays.Interview on 01/27/26 at 1:05 P.M. [NAME] #299 confirmed he did not wear hairnet during lunch service and was observed getting a hair net.Review of the facility's policy titled, Hair Restraints, not dated confirmed hair shall be restrained to prevent physical contamination of food. Hair restraints shall be worn by all employees while in the kitchen to cover all hair.Observation on 01/27/26 at 12:31 P.M revealed dietary manager #215 touching own face with hands on 01/27/26 at 12:35 P.M. and did not perform hang hygiene while serving trays during lunch tray service.Interview on 01/27/26 at 1:05…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, self-reported incident (SRI) investigation review, staff interview, and review of the facility's abuse policy and procedure, this facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse was submitted to the appropriate state agency as required. This affected two (Resident #410 and #510) of the three residents reviewed for sexual abuse. The facility census was 87. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #510 revealed an initial admission date of 07/31/2025 with a re-entry date of 08/20/2025 and a discharge date of 11/202/2025. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, mood disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #510's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of the nursing progress note dated 11/14/25 at 2:44 P.M. created by the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #374) of one resident observed during incontinence care . The census was 87.Findings include:Review of Resident #374's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/27/23. Medical diagnoses include unspecified dementia, moderate with psychotic disturbance, moderate-protein calorie disturbance, essential (primary) hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, atrial fibrillation, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, dysarthria and anarthria, low back pain, and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.Review of Resident #374's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 01/09/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15. Resident #374's functional abilities revealed Resident #374 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.Review of Resident #374's care plan dated 10/14/25 revealed Resident #374 always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and comfortable living environment for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 94. Findings include: An observation on 08/04/25 from 8:57 A.M. to 9:12 A.M. was conducted throughout multiple hallways and common areas. Upon entrance to the building, a large stain was noted on the ceiling tile above the second door on the right. In Hallway G, light fixtures two, six and seven contained debris and light shades on fixtures six and seven were cracked. Peeling ceiling drywall was observed after light fixture three. Outside Resident #74's room, the ceiling showed damaged paint and unfinished ceiling texture. Outside Resident #72's room, peeling ceiling was identified around the fire sprinkler and a ceiling stain was visible above the beauty shop door.Continued observation revealed in Hallway H, damaged drywall shaped like a removed hand sanitizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed accurately and a correction was submitted timely to reflect Resident #90's disposition. This affected one resident (#90) out of four residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 94.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 06/17/19, with diagnoses including hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, depression, polyneuropathy, chronic pain, dementia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), benign prostatic hyperplasia, acquired absence of the right leg above the knee, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of a progress note dated 03/02/25 revealed Resident #90 was enroute to a local hospital by critical transport, and the power of attorney was notified of the intended location.Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, completed on 03/02/25, revealed the discharge status was coded as discharge - return anticipated and marked as an unplanned discharge.Review of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing devices were free from soil. This affected one (Resident #33) out of three residents reviewed for pressure reducing measures. The facility census was 94. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 05/06/25 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, severe sepsis with septic shock, metabolic encephalopathy and a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left heel.Review of the care plan dated 05/07/25 revealed Resident #33 has an actual area of skin impairment with interventions including use of an air mattress, encouragement to wear boots on both feet, evaluation for pain, completion of wound treatments, nursing observation of the wound dressing to ensure it remains intact, monitoring for clinical changes in the wound and completion of skin observations on shower days and as ordered.Review of physician orders dated 05/08/25 revealed the resident is to wear boots on both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure name badges were worn at all times by facility staff. This affected all 93 residents at the facility. Facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation on 06/30/25 at 9:48 A.M. of Certified Nurse Assistant #1111 revealed no name badge present. Concurrent interview verified no name badge was present and has not had a permanent one since being hired. The temporary badges that are being used fall off a lot as they are just a sticker. Observation on 06/30/25 at 10:29 A.M. of Activities Aide #1000 revealed no name badge present. Concurrent interview verified that no name badge was present and had not had a permanent one since she lost it. Will obtain a temporary sticker one now. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:31 A.M. with Resident #301 revealed the staff at the facility rarely have name badges on. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:42 A.M. with Resident #302 revealed the staff at the facility rarely have name badges on and she can't keep them straight because of that. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:47 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure scheduled activities were completed as well as ensuring evening activities were scheduled. This affected 92 residents (except for Resident #233) who attend/participate in activities. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:31 A.M. with Resident #301 in the activities room revealed the facility rarely does the activities that are posted on the board and stated They just sit out stuff on the table for us to do on our own. No activities in the evening so he gets bored a lot. Interview on 06/30/25 at 10:42 A.M. with Resident #302 revealed there are really never any activities occurring. There are items on the tables, but when it comes to the scheduled events, they rarely happen. There are no evening activities to do as well. She goes into the activities room a lot and can never find anyone with activities in there. Observation on 06/30/25 at 11:30 A.M. of the activities room revealed no move and groove activity being conducted as per schedule with a total of 9 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 65 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete staff performance evaluations as required. This had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents. Findings Include: Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #165 and CNA #179 personnel records found they did not have a completed 90 day performance evaluation completed. Interview with Visiting Administrator #600 on 12/04/24 at 10:30 A.M. confirmed they have no evidence to support the above staff had performance evaluations completed as required.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations , and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the steam warmer and two compartment sink was maintained in a safe and operating condition . This had the potential to affect 85 residents. The census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 12/04/24 at 10:24 A.M. of the kitchen's two compartment sink omitted a strong odor of sewage. The sink was empty. Verified by dietary Aide #105. Observation on 12/4/24 at 10:28 A.M. behind the serving line the steam oven was dripping water from the bottom left side of the door. The water dripped approximately 2 feet down to a 11 x 11 serving metal bin. [NAME] # 217 revealed when she uses the steamer the water drips out . The staff must empty the water filled bin every one to two hours. Dietician #168 verified the water and confirmed she reported the issue to corporate in November 2024. Interview on 12/04/24 03:16 P.M. with the Administrator regarding the steam oven, he confirmed it had been replaced once in the past. The maintenance man must change the seals to prevent the water from dripping. Interview on 12/05/24 01:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one resident (Resident #189) who had a feeding tube in place. The facility also failed to follow infection control procedures during wound care for two residents (Residents #81 and #300) and did not follow infection control procedures during catheter care for one resident (Resident #10). The deficient practices affected four residents (#10, #81, #189, #300) of four reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an initial admission date of 05/28/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, dependence on respirator, obstructive sleep apnea, bladder neck obstruction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, congestive heart failure, spinal stenosis lumbar region, hypertension and depression. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and resident council meeting notes the facility failed to document in writing its responses and rationale to resident council grievances and recommendations. This had the potential to affect eight (#1, #9, #24, #14, #42, #51, #58 and # 66) residents who attend the meetings monthly. The census was 88. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council monthly meeting minutes from 12/26/23 to 11/24/24 revealed old business issues are discussed with no details documented. The meetings do discuss any concerns the residents have and are listed in the meeting minutes, however, there is no documentation from administration of addressing the residents' questions and concerns. Interview on 12/4/24 at 3:29 PM with Resident Council President #42 reported she is not aware of any written responses to the questions and concerns voiced at Resident Council . It is her understanding Activity Director #182 takes care of all the details. Interview on 12/04/24 at 3:45 P.M. with the Activity Director #182 revealed they report concerns from Resident Council in stand up administrative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the opportunity to view or receive resident medical records in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #65) of one resident reviewed for medical record release. The census was 88. Findings Include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were end stage renal disease, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, anemia, gout, type II diabetes. other psychoactive substance abuse, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pure hypercholesterolemia, low back pain, neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, esophagitis, anxiety disorder, and allergic rhinitis. Review of facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician after a significant weight change occurred for Resident #66. This affected one (Resident #66) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 03/16/23 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy, and unspecified dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was rarely/never understood, and Section K triggered weight loss concerns without a prescribed weight-loss regimen. A brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 8 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #66's care plan included maintaining adequate nutritional status and addressing weight changes, with interventions including fortified foods twice daily and boost glucose control supplementation. Review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a timely and thorough grievance investigation and resolution for resident #9's grievances. This affected one (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for grievance handling. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on respirator/ventilator status, obstructive sleep apnea, essential hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, unspecified depression, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, generalized muscle weakness, and stenosis of a coronary artery stent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for residents. This affected three (#10,#18, and #69) of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure (CHF), depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 01/12/23 revealed the resident utilized a non-invasive ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure with hypercapnia and COPD. Interventions included keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy and procedure review the facility failed to invite residents' family and or resident representative to a residents' Care Conference. This had the potential to affect two residents (#50 and #70) . The census was 88 . Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 07/21/21 with sever cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, depression and anxiety. Resident #50 requires one person assist with activities of daily living. Review of Resident #50 Care Conference Summary on 07/11/24 revealed Resident #50's Health Care Power of Attorney was not invited to the care conference. Interview on 12/02/24 at 2:05 P.M. with Resident #50's family representative revealed she has not been invited to Resident #50's Care conferences. She confirmed she is the Health Care and Financial Power of Attorney. Interview on 12/04/24 with the Social Services Designee # 112 confirmed she has no documentation indicating Resident #50's representative had been invited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#10), who was dependent on staff received routine nail care. This affected one resident (#10) of four resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to COPD, severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, CHF, depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 11/03/22 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to new admission, weakness, depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for as needed pain medication administration. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for opioid use. Also, the facility failed to follow wound care orders. This affected one (Resident #70) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were end stage renal disease, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, anemia, gout, type II diabetes. other psychoactive substance abuse, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pure hypercholesterolemia, low back pain, neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, esophagitis, anxiety disorder, and allergic rhinitis. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure off-loading skin interventions were in place as physician ordered for one resident. This affected one resident (#10) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to COPD, severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, CHF, depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 11/03/22 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to new admission, weakness, depression, cognition. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding services were provided Resident #189. This affected one (Resident #189) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding services. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #189 revealed an admission date of 11/18/24 with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia, and other complex conditions. Review of Resident #189's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment indicated severe cognitive impairment and the need for maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including dressing, toileting, and mobility. Review of the physician orders for Resident #189 revealed orders to clean the peg tube site with normal saline and apply split gauze daily starting 11/19/24. Additionally, Enteral feeding was ordered once daily via PEG tube, with a specified rate of 50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure provision of appropriate equipment was at the bedside for immediate access for two residents (#9 and #69) and failed to ensure one resident's (#10) nasal cannula oxygen delivery equipment was dated. This affected three residents ( Resident #9,#10 and #69) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an initial admission date of 09/15/22 with the latest readmission of 01/12/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure (CHF), depression, psychosis, dependence on respiratory ventilator, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, auditory hallucinations, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have all dialysis communication and records were in the facility to ensure full care could be provided. This affected one (Resident #65) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 88. Findings Include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were end stage renal disease, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, anemia, gout, type II diabetes. other psychoactive substance abuse, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, dysphagia, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, pure hypercholesterolemia, low back pain, neuropathy, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, esophagitis, anxiety disorder, and allergic rhinitis. Review of facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #65…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly monitor residents psychotropic medications to ensure the need/appropriate dose of psychotropic medications. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 88. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder, asthma, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dementia, lack of coordination, schizoaffective disorder, shortness of breath, osteoporosis, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease, moderate intellectual disabilities, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and diffuse traumatic brain injury. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7 physician orders found she was prescribed the following psychotropic medications: Olanzapine 15 milligrams (mg), Depakote 250 mg twice daily,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was completed for a medication as ordered for Resident #9. This affected one (Resident #9) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 2/15/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on respirator/ventilator status, obstructive sleep apnea, essential hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, unspecified depression, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, generalized muscle weakness, and stenosis of a coronary artery stent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly monitor resident behaviors to ensure the need/appropriate dose of psychotropic medications. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 88. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder, asthma, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dementia, lack of coordination, schizoaffective disorder, shortness of breath, osteoporosis, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease, moderate intellectual disabilities, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and diffuse traumatic brain injury. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7 physician orders found a new order for Olanzapine 15 milligrams (mg) for schizoaffective disorder was started on 11/18/24. Prior to this order, she was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely collection of a urine sample for a urinary tract infection (UTI) as ordered for Resident #81. This affected one (Resident #81) out of one resident reviewed for labs. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 5/28/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes, obesity, dependence on respirator, lack of coordination, obstructive sleep apnea, bladder-neck obstruction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, difficulty walking, edema, combined systolic heart failure, spinal stenosis, and several other chronic conditions. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (Additionally, a BIMS assessment on 12/02/24 with a score of 15), indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #81 was dependent on a wheelchair and required assistance with toileting, bathing, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#18) oral assessments were accurate and dental services were arranged to address the resident's poor dental status. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for dental. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an initial admission date of 08/07/24 with the most recent admission of 10/11/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, fibromyalgia, arthritis, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, obstructive sleep apnea, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, paraplegia, pain, constipation, osteoarthritis, dysphagia and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the plan of care dated 09/05/24 revealed the resident required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) related to fibromyalgia and paraplegia. Interventions included apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review,staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow their antibiotic stewardship processes for Residents #81 and #43. This affected two (Resident's #81 and #43) out of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 5/28/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes, obesity, dependence on respirator, lack of coordination, obstructive sleep apnea, bladder-neck obstruction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, difficulty walking, edema, combined systolic heart failure, spinal stenosis, and several other chronic conditions. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (Additionally, a BIMS assessment on 12/02/24 with a score of 15), indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #9 was dependent on a wheelchair and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer the influenza vaccine to one resident (Resident #20) and the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine to one resident (Resident #6) after the residents consented to receive the vaccinations. The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #6 and #20) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an initial admission date on 01/18/24 and a readmission date on 03/08/24. Medical diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus without complications, metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, essential hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Vaccine Administration Record Informed Consent for Vaccination dated 10/25/24 revealed Resident #20's representative consented for the resident to receive an influenza vaccine. There was no evidence in the medical record Resident #20 received the influenza vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility did not keep an accurate record of skin wound assessments in the medical record for one (Resident #101) out of three residents with skin wounds. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #101, revealed an admission date of 01/18/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, bacteremia, vascular dementia, and type 2 diabetes. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 out of 15 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. The resident was determined to not have a pressure ulcer but at risk for developing them. Review of the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #101 revealed no skin alterations for his left and right buttock and his groin area. Review of the skin observation dated 01/21/24 for Resident #101 revealed skin was intact with no new areas opened. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep clean drying dishware in a clean dry location and not exposed to dust or other contamination. This had the potential to affect 87 out of 88 residents who receive beverages from the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 11/13/23 at 11:27 A.M. revealed a recently cleaned rack of mugs and cups air drying on the end of the dishwasher line. Observed a ceiling tile with light pink insulation and dust hanging down from both ends of the ceiling tile and a ceiling vent next to the ceiling tile that was covered in dust. The tiles were above the clean rack of mugs and cups. Interview on 11/13/23 at 11:27 A.M. with Corporate Food Service Director #208 confirmed the ceiling area could be cleaner and there is pink dust at the end of the ceiling vents. Review of the undated Dish Machine Cleaning policy and the weekly Cleaning chart both do not indicate the area above where air drying is taking place.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to export resident assessments in a timely manner. This affected 16 (Residents #5, #16, #25, #35, #38, #39, #40, #44, #48, #50, #51, #52, #56, #67, #74, and #83) of 19 resident assessments reviewed. The census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were dementia, anemia, type II diabetes, depression, COPD, schizoaffective disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, schizophrenia, hypokalemia, aphasia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, altered mental status, and psychosis. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/06/23, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5 MDS assessments revealed the last assessment submitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) was on 07/06/23. The facility had started/completed the her most recent MDS on 10/06/23, but due to the electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was an appropriate smooth texture prior to serving to residents on a pureed diet and required surveyor intervention for safety. This had the potential to affect nine residents (Residents #7, #49, #39, #5, #75, #4, #81, #64, and #52) who were on a prescribed pureed diet. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 11/15/23 at 10:48 A.M. with [NAME] #117 revealed the cook was preparing pureed Italian blend vegetables. [NAME] #117 confirmed the menu for lunch was Italian blend mixed vegetables and barbeque chicken. The recipes were observed to the left of [NAME] #117 during preparation. Vegetables in the Italian vegetable mix include carrots, green beans, cauliflower, and broccoli. Dietary Manager (DM) #178 was present for observation. Observation and interview on 11/15/23 at 10:54 A.M. revealed [NAME] #117 stopped puree machine and stated the vegetable mix was the proper texture for serving to residents. The surveyor present tasted the vegetable mix for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately confirm one resident's (Resident #71's) code status. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the resident record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy, aphasia, seizures, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of the Durable Power of Attorney for Management of Property and Personal Affairs dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 named his wife to be Power of Attorney (POA) for finances only. There was not a POA for healthcare decisions named for Resident #71. Review of Resident #71's facesheet revealed the resident was his own responsible party and guarantor. Resident #71's wife was listed as an emergency contact only. Review of the admission Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess one resident's (Resident #71) cognition. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of one reviewed for appropriate cognitive status. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the resident record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date on 06/03/22. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy, aphasia, seizures, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had severely impaired cognition and scored two out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had severely impaired cognition and scored two out of 15 on the BIMS assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care for three residents (#33, #53, #61) in the area of contractures and antipsychotic medication use. This affected one (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for contractures and two (Resident #33 and Resident #53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an initial admission date of 10/30/20 with the latest readmission of 06/12/22 with diagnoses including fracture of upper end of right tibia, severe morbid obesity, dependence on respirator, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis lumbar region, obstructive sleep apnea, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, pain, chronic respiratory failure, polyneuropathy, chronic allergic conjunctivitis, overactive bladder, gastro-esophageal reflux and on 06/01/22 the diagnoses of schizophrenia was added.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan to specifically address one resident's (Resident #71) cognitive status changes and whether or not a legal resident representative was needed for healthcare decision making. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the resident record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date on 06/03/22. Medical diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), cognitive communication deficit, encephalopathy, aphasia, seizures, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of the Durable Power of Attorney for Management of Property and Personal Affairs dated 01/24/22 revealed Resident #71 named his wife to be Power of Attorney (POA) for finances only. There was not a POA for healthcare decisions named for Resident #71. Review of Resident #71's facesheet revealed the resident was his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #239) vital signs were checked upon returning from dialysis treatments. This affected one resident (Resident #239) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #239 revealed and initial admission date on 10/24/23 and a readmission date on 11/03/23. Medical diagnoses included cognitive deficit deficit, end stage renal disease, and acute kidney failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #239 had intact cognition and scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #239's function level varied from supervision with eating to total dependence with personal hygiene. Resident #239 required maximal assistance with lower dressing, bathing, and toileting. Resident #239 did not require dialysis at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of pharmacy recommendations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address a pharmacy recommendation for one resident (Resident #33) and failed to provide a rationale for declining a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for two residents (Residents #28 and #33). This affected two residents (Residents #28 and #33) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date on 09/16/21. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, mood (affective} disorder, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 04/10/23 revealed Resident #33 received a current dose of Seroquel (Quetiapine) 75 milligrams once daily without an attempted Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR). The recommendation was to consider a GDR while monitoring for re-emergence of behavioral and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure parameters for when the physician should be notified were provided for one resident's (Resident #33) insulin orders. This affected one resident (Resident #33) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date on 09/16/21. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with neuropathy and chronic kidney disease, mood (affective} disorder, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders dated November 2023 revealed Resident #33 had the following insulin orders: Humalog Infection Solution inject five units subcutaneously at bedtime dated 06/22/23, Insulin Glargine Solution inject 20 units subcutaneously one time a day upon rise dated 07/29/23, Insulin Glargine Solution inject 30 units subcutaneously at bedtime dated 07/28/23, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medications for three residents (#28, #33, #53) and failed to monitor for side effects of antipsychotic medication use for one resident (#33). This affected three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an initial admission date of 11/27/17 with the most recent readmission of 01/23/18 with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, right sided hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, cardiomyopathy, dementia with mild behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychosis. Review of the plan of care dated 05/01/20 revealed the resident had potential for adverse side effects of psychotropic drug use, antidepressant, TBI and major depressive disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests for residents as physician ordered. This affected two (Resident #28 and Resident #53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an initial admission date of 11/27/17 with the most recent readmission of 01/23/18 with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, right sided hemiplegia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, cardiomyopathy, dementia with mild behavioral disturbance, vitamin D deficiency, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and psychosis. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficit. Review of the monthly physician orders for November 2023 identified orders dated 02/10/22 Depakote level and liver function test (LFT), every three months,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain one resident's (Resident #239) wheelchair in proper working order. This affected one of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #239 revealed an initial admission date of 10/24/23 with the latest readmission of 11/03/23 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, retention of urine, end stage renal disease, dependence on hemodialysis and acute kidney failure. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. On 11/13/23 at 4:22 P.M., interview with Resident #239 revealed she had two different foot pedals to her wheelchair and the left foot pedal would not latch causing her legs spread when moved. Resident #239 revealed this caused her pain to her hips and legs. The resident revealed her transport driver who transports her to dialysis three times a week, as well as herself had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, observation, policy review, and review of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to meet the needs of the residents. This affected three (#38, #40, and #86) of three residents reviewed for activities. The census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 07/15/21. Resident #40's medical diagnoses included bipolar disorder, diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #40's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/03/23, revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Review of the activities care plan, dated 08/02/23, revealed Resident #40 needed encouragement to participate in activities and was dependent on staff for activities. Interventions included to encourage Resident #40 to participate in activities. Review of Resident #40's Record of One on One Activities, dated September 2023, revealed Resident #40 was documented as having a active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene was completed for one resident (#52) who was dependent on staff. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 06/22/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, vascular dementia, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had severe cognitive impairment. Additionally, the resident required the extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 07/18/23 revealed Resident #52 required assistance for ADL related to cognitive impairment and immobility. Interventions included inspecting skin during personal care, staff assist with daily hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of nursing staff to meet the total care needs of all residents in a timely manner. This affected eight residents (#128, #123, #33, #103, #113, #19, #98 and #105) and had the potential to affect all 134 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #128 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including COVID-19, heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage three, and atrial fibrillation. Record review revealed the resident was a Full Code related to advance directives. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance from one staff for bed mobility and toilet use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner to ensure all residents received the care and services necessary to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This had the potential to affect all 134 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the annual recertification, extended and complaint survey completed from [DATE] through [DATE] the following concerns were identified through observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview: a. The facility failed to ensure all residents (including Resident #11, #13, #65 and #85) who required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care received timely and appropriate care and services to maintain proper hygiene and grooming. See findings at F677. b. The facility failed to initiate timely and adequate Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for Resident #128 who was a full-code and required CPR after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected six residents (#11, #35, #45, #53, #87 and #117) of 134 residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 10/25/21 at 12:50 P.M. observation of the lunch meal revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #445 was observed passing meal trays on Hall A. At 12:50 P.M. Resident #117, who was observed in the dining room was served a meal tray. There were four other residents, Resident #11, #35, #45 and #53 at the table who were not served at that time. STNA #445 then passed more trays on Hall A leaving the dining room to do so. At 1:04 P.M. STNA #445 had Resident #48 come to the dining area and served him his tray and Resident #35 was also served at this time. STNA #445 again left the dining room and passed more trays on the hall A. Resident #11, #45 and #53 watched the other residents eat until 1:06 P.M. when they were finally served their tray. Interview with STNA #445…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable environment for all residents. This affected six residents (#34, #24, #71, #385, #46 and #11) of 14 residents reviewed for physical environment. Findings include: 1. On 10/25/21 at 10:46 A.M. Resident #34 was observed sitting on a bedside commode as if it were a chair. The bed side commode was next to the head of Resident #34's bed. Resident #34 was fully dressed and gazing out the window. There was not a personal (sitting) chair located in Resident #34's room. Additional observations on 10/27/21 at 8:38 A.M. and on 11/03/21 at 8:50 A.M. revealed the bedside commode remained beside Resident #34's bed and no other chair was observed to be in the resident's room. On 10/27/21 at 10:47 A.M. interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #485 confirmed there was no chair available for Resident #34 or any visitors in the resident's room. STNA #485 revealed she thought the resident was OK sitting on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) were completed for residents diagnosed with a new mental diagnosis at the time of or after their admission to the facility. This affected five residents (#11, #63, #64, #98, and #109) of eight residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia, anxiety disorder, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depression disorder. A new diagnosis (dated [DATE]) for unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition was also included on the resident's diagnoses list. Review of the Preadmission Screening/Resident Review Identification Screen, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had a mood disorder and depression. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. On [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all residents who required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care received timely and appropriate care and services to maintain proper hygiene and grooming. This affected five residents (#11, #13, #18, #65 and #85) of nine residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, schizophrenia, major depression and anemia. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/24/20 revealed staff would assist as needed with daily hygiene and assist with showering resident as per facility policy weekly. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/04/21 revealed the resident exhibited cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of two plus staff members for bed mobility and extensive assistance of one plus staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate urinary catheter care to prevent the risk of urinary tract infections for residents. This affected four residents (#61, #383, #87 and #11) of five residents reviewed for urinary catheters and/or urinary tract infections. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 03/03/21 with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, muscle weakness, paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, urinary tract infection, adult failure to thrive, diabetes, dementia, major depressive disorder and personal history of cerebral infarction. Review of the plan of care, dated 05/03/21 revealed Resident #61 had potential for complications related to suprapubic catheter. Interventions for Resident #61 included to assist with catheter care as needed, educate resident on signs and symptoms of urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of facility investigations and interview the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and individualized behavior management programs for residents with dementia to prevent resident to resident altercations and to ensure each resident maintained their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected five residents (#10, #19, #113, #126 and #127) with the potential to affect all 21 residents residing on D hall/East Building and two residents (#13 and #111) with the potential to affect all 19 residents residing on A hall/East Building. The facility census was 134. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #113 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia, metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly and were disposed of following expiration. This affected four residents (#61, #115, #128 and #59) of 21 residents who resided on the F Hall. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:15 P.M. observation of the F Hall medication cart revealed several medications were observed to be without open or expiration dates. Several insulin pens, including Novolog insulin pens for Residents #61 and #115, were observed sitting loosely in the top drawer of the medication cart and were not stored in a bag or box. Novolog insulin pens were observed to be labeled for Residents #61 and #115 with no expiration dates written on the pens. Further observation revealed a Novolog insulin pen labeled for Resident #59 was penned with an expiration date of 09/28. A Humalog insulin pen was observed to be labeled for Resident #128 (who expired in the facility on [DATE]), with no expiration date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional and sanitary environment for all residents. This affected Resident #383 who resided on the F hall and had the potential to affect all 21 residents who resided on the D hall/East Building and all 19 residents who resided on the A hall/East Building. The facility census was 134. Findings include: 1. On 11/02/21 at 1:30 P.M. Resident #383 was observed to be resting in bed A of her room. At the time of the observation, the privacy curtain in the room was observed bunched in the middle corner of the L shaped track for bed A, and partially blocking the view of Resident #383 from the door. When attempting to pull the privacy curtain to the side, to gain entrance to the room and observe and interview Resident #383, the curtain was observed to feel lose and flimsy, and spring up and down several inches. Further observation revealed the metal, L shaped track that was connected to the ceiling and holding up the privacy curtain, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #87 and Resident #93's call lights were within reach to accommodate the residents' need to obtain staff assistance by ringing the call light. This affected two residents (#87 and #93) of 51 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed an original admission date 02/01/21 with the latest readmission of 10/19/21. Resident #87 had diagnoses including pseudobulbar affect, aphasia, urinary tract infection (UTI), urine retention, peripheral vascular disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis, psychosis, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, bipolar disorder, atrial fibrillation and dysphagia. Review of the plan of care, dated 02/05/21 revealed the resident required assistance for activities related to cognitive/communication deficits, no awareness of needs or limitations and incontinence of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to keep call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for residents they managed personal fund accounts for. This affected two residents (#15 and #71) of seven residents reviewed for accounting of funds. The facility identified 84 residents for whom they managed personal fund accounts. Findings include: On 10/25/21 at 10:35 A.M. interview with Resident #15 revealed the facility had never provided him with an account statement for his personal funds account and he didn't know how much money he had. On 10/25/21 at 11:06 A.M. interview with Resident #71 revealed the facility managed personal funds for him and he had never received a balance statement. Review of the personal fund account documentation for Resident #121, #11, #112, #48, #39, #15 and #71 revealed no evidence quarterly statements were provided to the residents and/or their representatives each quarter. On 10/26/21 at 1:29 P.M. interview with Business Office Manager #550 verified there was no documentation/ evidence quarterly statements were issued to Resident #121, #11, #112, #48, #39,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #21 and Resident #87's advance directives were accurate and based on the residents' current wishes. This affected two residents (#21 and #87) of five residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed an original admission date [DATE] with the latest readmission of [DATE]. Resident #87 had diagnoses including pseudobulbar affect, aphasia, urinary tract infection (UTI), urine retention, peripheral vascular disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis, psychosis, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, bipolar disorder, atrial fibrillation and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others, sometimes made herself understood and had a moderate cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during wound care for Resident #27 and during urinary catheter care for Resident #58. This affected one resident (#58) four residents reviewed urinary catheter use and one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine regurgitates from the bladder back into the ureter) chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/04/21 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, he required supervision with set up assistance and supervision from one staff for bed mobility, transfers and dressing with one person physical assist. Review of the current physician's orders revealed an order, initiated 02/05/21 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I screen was completed accurately for Resident #126 upon admission. This affected one resident (#126) of eight residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #126 revealed an admission date of 05/20/21 with diagnoses including personal history of malignant neoplasm of unspecified digestive organ, encephalopathy, altered mental status, hyperlipidemia, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit and aphasia. The diagnosis of delusional disorders was dated 05/20/21. Review of the review results, dated 05/21/21 revealed the Pre-admission Screening (PAS) determination had no indications of serious mental illness nor a developmental disability. Review of the PASARR for Resident #126 dated 05/21/21 revealed no mental illness was noted. On 10/26/21 from 4:36 P.M. to 4:48 P.M. interview with Social Worker (SW) #481 revealed she was responsible for completing the PASARR forms for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia, chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure and anemia. Review of the admission MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 09/23/21 revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired, he required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use and extensive assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene. The assessment revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Review of the physician's orders for 10/2021 revealed an order for Foley catheter care every shift and as needed, empty urinary catheter bag every shift and as needed (prn) and record output and total every 24 hours. Review of the plan of care, dated 10/16/21 revealed to obtain urine output each shift and total for 24 hour period. Further review of the medical record revealed the urine output and total was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to accurately assess and monitor areas of non-pressure related skin impairment for Resident #46 and failed to ensure physician ordered skin treatments were documented only when completed. This affected one resident (#46) of three residents reviewed for skin treatments. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominants side, muscle weakness, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the physician's orders dated 04/29/21 revealed an order to apply DermaSarra Anti-Itch Lotion 0.5-0.5 % (Camphor-Menthol) every shift for itching for Resident #46. Review of the plan of care, dated 06/04/21 revealed Resident #46 had the potential for alteration in skin integrity related to cognitive communication deficit, hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #123 received a vision follow up for complaints of double vision. This affected one resident (#123) of two residents reviewed for vision services. Findings include: Record review for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 02/12/21 with diagnoses including heart failure, anxiety, diabetes type two, depression, weakness and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the care plan, dated 02/15/21 revealed the resident was at risk for visual decline/undetected eye diseases, or currently exhibited deficits as evidenced by diabetes type two. Interventions included to arrange eye appointments if increased visual deficits were noted Review of an eye exam, dated 08/23/21 revealed the resident's right and left eyes were in stable condition, the resident denied changes in vision and eye pain. There was no active diabetic retinopathy in either eye. Hypertensive retinopathy noted with mild retinal changes consistent with high blood pressure and minimal occlusive risk. New orders to return in six to nine months for a follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to assess and implement weight loss interventions for Resident #87, a resident identified with a a significant weight loss following a hospitalization. This affected one resident (#87) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed an original admission date 02/01/21 with the latest readmission of 10/19/21. Resident #87 had diagnoses including pseudobulbar affect, aphasia, urinary tract infection (UTI), urine retention, peripheral vascular disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis, psychosis, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, bipolar disorder, atrial fibrillation and dysphagia. Review of the plan of care, dated 02/05/21 revealed Resident #87 was at risk for alteration in nutrition and/or hydration related to behavioral problems, edentulous, need for feeding assistance and mechanically altered diet. Interventions included to address any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #92's oxygen equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed per physician order. This affected one resident (#92) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of Resident #92's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/21 and diagnoses of acute respiratory failure and oxygen dependence. Review of the physician's orders, dated 09/03/21 revealed staff were to change the resident's oxygen tubing and set up every Friday. On 09/02/21 the resident was ordered oxygen on one liter via nasal cannula. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/09/21 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 02, indicating impaired cognition. The assessment revealed the resident required limited assistance from one staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion via walker and personal hygiene and the resident utilized oxygen therapy. Review of the care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the hemodialysis center regarding care and services for Resident #109. This affected one resident (#109) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #109's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the plan of care, dated 06/15/21 revealed communicate with dialysis center staff regarding plan of care, lab values and diet/fluid restriction recommendations. Nurse to utilize dialysis communication form for pre-dialysis assessment including obtaining vital signs. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/16/21 revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment revealed the resident required supervision from staff with set up assistance for dressing and personal hygiene. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered. This affected three residents (#31, #91 and #282) of 51 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #91 revealed an admission date of 08/26/21 with diagnoses including intellectual disabilities, psychosis, mood disorder, weakness, insomnia, difficulty walking, need for assistance with personal care and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the care plan, dated 08/26/21 revealed Resident #91 had impaired cognitive process for daily decision making and she was at risk for further decline in cognitive function. Interventions included to encourage the resident to make routine daily decisions and administer medications as ordered. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/08/21 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating impaired cognition. The assessment revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to timely clarify conflicting physician recommendations from a pharmacy medication regimen review dated 06/23/21 to ensure Resident #79 received appropriate care and treatment related to the use of an anti-anxiety medication. This affected one resident (#79) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 08/06/16 with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, psychosis, dementia with behavior disturbances, encephalopathy and insomnia. Review of the care plan, dated 06/10/20 revealed the resident had the potential for mood swings and behavioral issues related to depression, psychosis and anxiety. Interventions included to administer as needed medications as ordered when the resident exhibited any increased agitation, anxiety, pacing, hallucinations, mood changes, restlessness, wandering or abusive behaviors, etc. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed from 06/19/21 through 07/07/21 the resident had an order for Ativan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days without a rationale extending the medication for Resident #79 and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the use of an as needed psychotropic medication for Resident #87. This affected two residents (#79 and #87) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications use. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 08/06/16 with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, psychosis, dementia with behavior disturbances, encephalopathy and insomnia. Review of the care plan, dated 06/10/20 revealed the resident had the potential for mood swings and behavioral issues related to depression, psychosis and anxiety. Interventions included to administer as needed medications as ordered when the resident exhibited any increased agitation, anxiety, pacing, hallucinations, mood changes, restlessness, wandering or abusive behaviors, etc. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain dental services in a timely manner for Resident #11, Resident #18 and Resident #98. This affected three residents (#11, #18 and #98) of three residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, schizophrenia, major depression and anemia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/04/21 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. The assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance of two plus staff members for bed mobility and extensive assistance of one plus staff member for toilet use, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the dental record revealed on 05/20/21 an emergency exam was completed and the resident was to be seen for further dental care. Record review revealed no further dental care had been provided for the resident as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #117's medical record was maintained in a complete and accurate manner related to monitoring the resident's output. This affected one resident (#117) of 51 sampled residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia, chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure and anemia. On 09/19/21 a physician's orders was received to record output every shift (qshift). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/23/21 revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired, he required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use and extensive assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene. The assessment revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2021-11-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to fulfill Resident Council member's (Resident #98 and #105) request for a wheelchair volleyball net, when the facility agreed to purchase wheelchair volleyball and did not follow through from March 2021 through November 2021. This affected two residents (#98 and #105) and had the potential to affect all 134 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/27/21 at 11:02 A.M. during an interview with Resident #98 and #105, both residents revealed they attended resident council meetings regularly and Resident #98 was currently the Resident Council President. During the interview, Resident #98 and #105 shared they had been asking for a wheelchair volleyball net since last March 2021 and it was never delivered by the facility. Resident #98 and #105 also shared they did not feel their ideas and suggestions were responded to by the facility. Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from 03/25/21 through 09/29/21 revealed evidence members of the resident council requested a wheelchair volleyball net on 03/25/21. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$167,295 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $167,295 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-15 for 80 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOPER, DASHAE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/01/2020 |
| REPCHICK, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $480K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365644. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.