Embassy Of Logan

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain the outside physical environment in a safe manner to prevent Resident #2 from sustaining a fall with injury. Actual harm occurred on 03/25/23 when Resident #2, who was independent with the use of a motorized (power) wheelchair sustained a fall in the parking lot, when his wheelchair fell into a pot hole resulting in a proximal humerus fracture to his right arm. The resident had increased pain to the area and was unable to use the motorized wheelchair for independent mobility for a period of time following the incident/injury. This affected one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 06/08/22 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, neuralgia, neuritis, depression, chronic pain, wheelchair dependent and on 03/26/23 a diagnosis of fracture of upper end of right humerus. Review of a power wheelchair mobility indoor driving assessment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect the 92 of 92 residents who receive trays from the kitchen. The census was 92. Findings include: On 03/17/2026 at 10:33 A.M. Observation of the kitchen revealed the confection oven with food splatter and food crumbs. A container under the steam table with food debris, the wall behind the plate warmer with dust and dirt build up. The wall behind the table with the toaster with dried food splatter. 03/18/2026 at 2:20 P.M. observation of the kitchen with Dietary Manager #109 revealed the hanging electrical outlet over the serving line had a built up of dust hanging on it, and on the air conditioning unit. The trash can be beside the confection oven and in the dish washing area with no lid on them. The stove with dried food debris and splatter on it. The shelf under the tray line with crumbs and food debris on it. This was verified at the time of the observation with Dietary Manager #109. Review of Sanitary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observation, policy and audit reviews, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the shower rooms on hallways 200 and 400. This had the potential to affect 42 residents (200 Hallway-Resident #51, Resident #27, Resident #64, Resident #39, Resident #15, Resident #33, Resident #89, Resident #41, Resident #45, Resident #85, Resident #34, Resident #79, Resident #08, Resident #54, Resident #01, Resident #40, Resident #23, Resident #36, Resident #12, and Resident #72. 400 Hallway-Resident #65, Resident #29, Resident #20, Resident #77, Resident #71, Resident #92, Resident #58, Resident #26, Resident #81, Resident #07, Resident #67, Resident #18, Resident # 74, Resident #93, Resident #101, Resident #75, Resident #48, Resident #80, Resident # 52, Resident #82, Resident #04, and Resident #69). The census was 92.Review of facilities audit conducted of water temperature log from January 2026-March 2026 revealed documented water temperatures were above 120 degrees F on 03/09/26, 03/02/26, 02/23/26, 02/19/26, 02/09/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to show documented evidence of resident and family participation in the care planning process. This affected one resident (#50) of one sampled for care planning. The facility census was 92. Findings include:Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/26/24 and diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, morbid obesity, diabetes, cirrhosis of the liver, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of two out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cogitatively impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #50 used a wheelchair for mobility, required set up for eating, and was dependent on facility staff for all other activities of daily living.Further review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an undated invitation to a care conference on 12/16/25 at 10:00 A.M. However, no evidence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on appropriate and timely completion regarding correct eyeglass prescription. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 92.Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/30/25. Diagnoses include schizoaffective disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #11's eyeglasses were obtained while at the facility and added to Resident #11's inventory sheet on 09/19/25. Glasses adjustment by 360 Care completed on 11/04/25.On 03/16/26 interview with Resident #11 revealed eyeglasses are not the correct prescription, and I have told someone about this. On 03/17/26 at 2:10 P.M. interview with Associate #216 revealed 360 Care was supposed to be out 03/11/26 to see resident. Associate #216 presented documentation from 360 Care on 03/11/26 and glasses were adjusted. Resident said that he can't see out of the bifocal very well was documented in the note.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered treatment was implemented. This affected one resident (#9) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 92. Findings Include:Review of the resident's medical record for Resident #9 revealed an initial admission date of 02/17/21 with the latest readmission date of 08/03/21 with the diagnoses including but not limited to polyneuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, speech disturbances, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, dry eye syndrome, GERD, PTSD, major depressive disorder, BPH and insomnia. Review of the plan of care dated 11/28/25 revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity related to a skin tear to the left outer knee. Interventions included air mattress to promote skin integrity, check patency every shift, encourage resident to elevate feet while in chair, encourage to turn and reposition every two hours,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to follow physician recommended parameters for medication. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 92. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/31/25 and diagnoses of cerebral infarction, unspecified and unspecified asthma, uncomplicated. Review of medical orders revealed an order from 01/30/26 for Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 milligrams (MG) oral tablet 25 MG (Metoprolol Tartate). Give 1.5 tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension (HTN). Hold if static blood pressure (SBP) below 110 or heart rate (HR) below 60. Review of the medical administration record revealed no documented SBP or HR from 01/30/26-02/26/26. On 02/26/26 pharmacy recommended to give 1.5 tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension (HTN). Hold if static blood pressure (SBP) below 110 or heart rate (HR) below 60. On 03/18/26 at 11:36 A.M. interview with Associate #114 confirmed medication should have been held on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record. This affected three residents (#5, #9 and #12) of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. Findings Included:1. Review of the resident's medical record for Resident #9 revealed an initial admission date of 02/17/21 with the latest readmission date of 08/03/21 with the diagnoses including but not limited to polyneuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, speech disturbances, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, dry eye syndrome, GERD, PTSD, major depressive disorder, BPH and insomnia. Review of the plan of care dated 11/28/25 revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity related to a skin tear to the left outer knee. Interventions included air mattress to promote skin integrity, check patency every shift, encourage resident to elevate feet while in chair, encourage to turn and reposition every two hours, evaluate wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to document treatments completed on two pressure ulcers for one resident (#111) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #111, revealed an admission date of 09/29/20. Diagnoses included but were not limited to schizophrenia, other reduced mobility pressure ulcer of left buttock stage IV (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling) and dependence on other enabling machines and devices. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 which indicated cognitive intactness. The resident was assessed to require dependence on toilet hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with transfers and independent with bed mobility. The resident was also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review ,staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified after a change in condition of a new wound or the worsening of a current wound. This affected four residents (#3, #74, #89, and #93) of seven reviewed for skin impairments. Facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 06/09/23. Diagnoses included depression, heart failure, diabetes, end stage renal disease, and absence of left leg below the knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively intact and required supervision touching assistance for personal hygiene and activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care dated 01/2024 revealed Resident #89 was at risk for skin impairments with interventions to inspect for reddened areas during daily care, weekly skin assessments, charge nurse to notify wound nurse, physician and family of any new areas, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms were maintained in a safe, functional, and sanitary manner. This affected six residents (Resident #6, #21, #53, #62, #63, and #152) of 32 that were observed for room conditions. The facility census was 98. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's room on 04/01/24 at 11:39 A.M. revealed the overbed light had a bulb that was burning out in the front of the overbed light. The light would turn on, but shined a pinkish-red color and was not fully lit. The resident's wall next to her bed had chipped paint and was in need of being painted. The entry door on the inside was noted to have chipped paint and was in need of being painted. On 04/04/24 at 8:23 A.M., a follow up observation was made of Resident #6's room and her room remained in disrepair. In addition to the above findings, the vent and surrounding ceiling area was noted to be covered in dust. Findings were verified by Maintenance Director #22. 2. Review of Resident #21's room on 04/01/24 at 10:02 A.M. revealed the floor tile next to her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $436K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH