Madison Health Care
7600 S Ridge Rd, Madison, OH 44057 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (440) 428-1492 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $109,991 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.9% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.1%CMS range 26.0–60.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 7.9–18.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 98.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.00 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of an emergency medical transportation record, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to provide goods and services to Resident #105 to prevent an incident of neglect resulting in the resident ' s death. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm/death beginning on [DATE] at approximately 8:18 P.M. when Resident #105, who had advance directives for a full code status was noted to exhibit behaviors and then subsequently requested (at around 12:00 A.M. on [DATE]) the use of an as needed bronchodilator (Albuterol) inhalation medication (used to treat or prevent bronchospasm and increase air flow to lungs) without further assessment or monitoring. On [DATE] at 12:37 A.M. Resident #105 was yelling and howling in his room; at which time Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #410 asked the resident to close his door. No additional assessment or monitoring of the resident was completed. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #450 delivered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a qualified dietary manager. This had the potential to affect all 99 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Interview with Dietary Director (DD) #601 on 06/24/26 at 9:27 A.M. revealed he was not a certified dietary manager or certified food service manager. He had no other certification specific to management of a food service program, no associates or higher degree in food service or hospitality, and no prior experience as a dietary director in a nursing facility. His overseeing dietician was not in the facility full-time.Record review of DD #601's employee file revealed no evidence of previous experience managing a dietary department in nursing homes and no certifications or degrees related to management of a nursing home's dietary program. He was hired as a dietary manager of the facility on 04/19/26.Interview with Human Resources Director #506 on 06/24/26 at 9:45 A.M. confirmed DD #601 lacked appropriate qualifications for the dietary director role.This deficiency represents non-compliance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide copies of a resident's medical record within two working days of the advanced notice. This affected one resident (Resident #40) of one resident who requested medical records. The census was 99.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24. Diagnoses included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and presence of a cardiac pacemaker (04/03/26). The resident resided on the secured memory care unit, and there was a designated power of attorney (POA) on record.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/30/26, revealed Resident #40 had severely impaired cognition, was independent with ambulation, and had no behaviors.Additional review of Resident #40's medical record revealed on 02/26/26 at approximately 12:12 P.M., Resident #40 was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. There was no evidence in the medical record of the resident or resident's representative requesting copies of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain its dumpster area in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the facilities dumpster area on 03/10/25 at 8:35 A.M. revealed two dumpster lids were not closed on one of two dumpsters. The top lid was open, and the side door was open with cardboard boxes hanging out the side. Interview at the time of the observation with Dietary Manager #381 verified the condition of the dumpsters at the time of observation.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of housekeeping staffing schedules, documentation of room cleanings and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure the environment was maintained in a safe, sanitary and comfortable manner affecting 31 Residents (#1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #11, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #27, #34, #37, #38, #40, #46, #56, #58, #60, #64, #66, #67, #71, #73, #81, #92, and #156) out of 102 residents observed for environment. Also, the facility had a dark unlit parking lot that had the potential to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observations on the initial tour on 03/10/25 from 9:05 A.M. to 10:04 A.M. of the secured units (400 and 500 units) revealed the following findings: • In Residents #1, #7, and #21's room, there were cobwebs in the corners of the ceiling extending down the wall that contained multiple insects inside the webs that were above Resident #1's and Resident #21's beds. The windowsill next to Residents #21's bed appeared to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to have an individual designated closet space in the resident's bedroom which affected three residents (#17, #18, and #81) out of three residents reviewed for adequate closet space and had the potential to affect three additional residents (#2, #3, and #67) identified by the facility as sharing closet space with Residents #17, #18, and #81. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 02/05/20 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the care plan dated 02/20/20 revealed Resident #17 was independent or required set-up with his activities of daily living (ADL). Interventions included assistance in choosing appropriate clothing as needed, encouraging and allowing the resident to complete self-care as able, and set-up assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin to the state agency for Resident #69. This affected one resident (#69) of one reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the hospital paperwork for discharge date d 07/30/24 revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the hospital prior to her admission to the facility, not limited to, for risk for self-harm, suicidal behavior with attempted self-injury and dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Resident #69 was admitted due to cutting her left wrist. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized anxiety, asthma, and dementia. Review of the progress note dated 07/31/24 at 2:45 P.M. revealed Resident #69 arrived at the facility via stretcher, oriented to room, hall, and call light. Review of the progress note dated 08/01/24 at 2:00 A.M. revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin for Resident #69. This affected one resident (#69) of one reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the hospital paperwork for discharge date d 07/30/24 revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the hospital prior to her admission to the facility, not limited to, for risk for self-harm, suicidal behavior with attempted self-injury and dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Resident #69 was admitted due to cutting her left wrist. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized anxiety, asthma, and dementia. Review of the progress note dated 07/31/24 at 2:45 P.M. revealed Resident #69 arrived at the facility via stretcher, oriented to room, hall, and call light. Review of the progress note dated 08/01/24 at 2:00 A.M. revealed Resident #69's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure Resident #71 had an order for the application and maintenance of his brace/splint to his left hand. This affected one resident (#71) out of one resident reviewed for use of a brace and/or splint. This had the potential to affect five additional residents (#24, #33, #39, #76, and #92) identified by the facility as having a brace and/or splint. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #71 had an admission date of 09/10/24 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, unspecified fracture of navicular scaphoid bone of left wrist, displaced fracture of triquetrum bone in left wrist, nondisplaced fracture of left radial process of left wrist, and diabetes. Review of Orthopedic #980's progress note (prior to admission) dated 06/17/24 revealed he was seen post op due to left scaphoid fracture that required hardware and pin placement. It was recommended that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, resident interview, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27, identified as a fall risk, had preventative measures in place to decrease the risk of a fall. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastroesophageal reflux disease, personality disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a history of repeated falls. Review of the physician order dated 07/14/24 revealed an order for Resident #27's wheelchair to have the brakes locked at all times when placed next to the bed and resident was in bed to prevent falls. Review of the physician order dated 10/20/24 revealed an order for a sign to remind Resident #27 to ring for assistance. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess Resident #89 for oxygen titration and failed to ensure oxygen was administered with high flow oxygen tubing. Also, the facility did not ensure Residents #7 and #81 had proper signage indicating oxygen in use on the entrance to their rooms. This affected three residents (#7, #81, and #89) out of four residents reviewed for oxygen use. This had the potential to affect 22 additional residents (#24, #30, #36, #39, #46, #47, #50, #51, #52, #53, #56, #59, #60, #76, #80, #82, #88, #91, #93, #95, #156, and #254) identified by the facility with oxygen. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels), amnesia (loss of memory), and aphasia (disorder which affects the ability to communicate). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #95 was free of significant medication error. This affected one resident (#95) out of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 102. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 10/16/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, hypertension, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the care plan dated 10/22/24 revealed Resident #95 was at risk for alterations in nutrition as he was to have nothing by mouth. He was receiving all his nutrition through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach to provide nutrition, medications, and hydration). Interventions included medications per physician order and provide tube feeding as ordered to meet nutrition and hydration needs. Review of the quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of statement of expert evaluation and facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #103 resided in the least restrictive environment and was free from involuntary seclusion. This affected one resident (Resident #103) out of three residents reviewed for restrictive environment. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #103's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 10/08/22 and diagnoses included generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, intractable with status epilepticus, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and unspecified dementia, mild with other behavioral disturbance. Resident #103 was discharged from the facility on 03/14/24. Review of Resident #103's progress notes dated 10/10/22 included Social Worker Assistant (SWA) #323 called Resident #103's daughter who was also her POA (Power of Attorney) to set up an initial care conference. Resident #103's daughter informed SWA #323 that Resident #103 would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to ensure Resident #66's open area to the crease of the left buttock and posterior thigh was identified and treated timely. This affected one resident (Resident #66) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/23/23 and diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, depression, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder and acquired absence of left upper limb below the elbow. Review of Resident #66's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was cognitively intact. Resident #66 was dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, personal hygiene and lower body dressing. Resident #66 was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. Review of Resident #66's care plan dated 10/23/23 and revised on 11/13/24 included Resident #66 had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had effective fall interventions in place to prevent frequent falls. This affected one resident (Resident #10) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/07/12 and diagnoses included moderate intellectual disabilities, major depressive disorder, generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, not intractable without status epilepticus, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #10's care plan dated 08/20/21 and revised 08/19/24 included Resident #10 had potential risk for falls and injury related to seizures, unsteadiness and use of psychoactive and seizure medications. Resident #10 was provided a helmet but was non compliant with use despite encouragement. Resident #10 continued to attempt self-ambulation and transferring despite constant reminders from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview, record review, local police report review, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision to prevent a resident from leaving the facility unattended without staff knowledge. This affected one (Resident #82) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of Resident #82's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/08/21. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, impulse disorder and falls. Review of Resident #82's care plan dated 01/01/24 revealed Resident #82 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to cognitive impairments and traumatic brain injury and fluctuations could occur. Interventions included extensive assistance with some tasks including dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Review of elopement assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #105) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 02/11/22 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, Vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, cirrhosis of liver, type two diabetes without complications, hyperlipidemia, obesity, schizophrenia, tobacco use, difficulty walking, constipation, gastro-esophageal reflux, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating cognitive impairment. Resident #105 displayed delusions. Resident #105 did not reject care. Setup or clean up assistance was needed for eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure food was palatable related to temperature and taste. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 10/26/23 at 7:32 A.M. of the tray line for the breakfast meal revealed a sausage patty, homemade french toast, fortified cream of wheat, pureed french toast, pureed sausage, orange juice, other types of juice and milk were on the menu for breakfast. Further observation revealed a tray on a cart next to the tray line area with many bowls of oatmeal with plastic lids on it. [NAME] #402 stated she put the oatmeal in dishes and placed them on the tray before tray line was started. Observation on 10/26/23 at 7:32 A.M. revealed two metal carts without doors or sides next to the tray line area. Further observation revealed three large carts with sides and doors. Dietary Manager (DM) #384 stated the metal carts and large carts with doors were used to transport the meal to the residents on the nursing units. Dietary Manager (DM) #384…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #86's room was clean and sanitary. This affected one resident (Resident #86) out of three residents reviewed for clean and sanitary rooms. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/23 and diagnoses included delusional disorders, stage three pressure ulcers of right and left heels, and morbid obesity due to excess calories. Review of Resident #86's admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was cognitively intact. Resident #86 required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, limited assistance of one staff member for transfers and toilet use, and was not steady but able to stabilized without staff assistance when moving on and off the toilet. Review of Resident #86's care plan dated 08/23/23 included Resident #86 needed ADL (Activity of Daily Living) assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #86 was placed on contact precautions for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA, spread by contact with infected people or things carrying the bacteria, staph bacteria resistant to common antibiotics) of her bilateral heels. This affected one resident (Resident #86) out of three reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/23 and diagnoses included delusional disorders, stage three pressure ulcers of right and left heels, and morbid obesity due to excess calories. Review of Resident #86's admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was cognitively intact. Resident #86 required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, limited assistance of one staff member for transfers and toilet use, and was not steady but able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours daily who was not acting in the capacity of the Director of Nursing. This had the potential to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility posted staffing information for January 2023 revealed on 01/02/23 there was no RN on duty for at least eight hours who was not acting in the capacity of the Director of Nursing. Review of the facility posted staffing information for August 2023 revealed on 08/11/23 there was no RN on duty for at least eight hours who was not the acting in the capacity of the Director of Nursing, and on 08/19/23 there was no RN on duty in the facility. Interview on 09/27/23 at 2:16 P.M. with Scheduler and State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #422 verified on 01/02/23, 08/11/23, and 08/19/23 there was no RN on duty for at least eight hours who was not acting in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-28 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit payroll-based journal (PBJ) data quarterly as required. This had the potential to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ staffing data report dated 09/15/23 revealed the facility failed to submit PBJ data for the second quarter of the federal fiscal year 2023. Review of the facility provided PBJ validation reports for the federal fiscal year 2023 revealed there was no evidence the PBJ data for the second quarter was submitted. Interview on 09/28/23 at 11:34 A.M. with Regional Administrative Director #539 verified there was no PBJ data submitted in the second quarter of the federal fiscal year 2023 as required. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00146162.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #94's indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag was covered with a dignity pouch. This affected one resident (#94) out of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter use. This had the potential to affect two residents (#94 and #105) that had urinary catheters at the facility. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 06/20/23 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had impaired cognition. He required limited assistance from one person with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. He had an indwelling catheter. Review of the care plan dated 07/10/23 revealed Resident #94 had the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain witnessed authorizations to manage resident funds. This affected three residents (#48, #67 and #98) of eight records reviewed for personal fund accounts. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/22/23. Review of the undated authorization and agreement form to handle resident funds revealed Resident #48's power-of-attorney signed the form and the form did not contain a witness signature as required. Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/25/21. Review of the undated authorization and agreement form to handle resident funds revealed Resident #67 signed the form and the form did not contain a witness signature as required. Review of Resident #98's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/17/22. Review of the undated authorization and agreement form to handle resident funds revealed Resident #98's representative payee signed the form and the form did not contain a witness signature as required. Interview on 09/28/23 at 9:24 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #28 wore hand splints as recommended per therapy and/or the physician order. This affected one resident (#28) of one resident reviewed for range of motion (ROM). The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 07/26/19 with diagnoses including sequela of cerebrovascular disease, contracture, and cerebral palsy. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #28 was moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated the resident required the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and dressing. The resident was totally dependent on two people for transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene and dependent on one person for locomotion. Review of physician orders for Resident #28 for September 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were followed during dining including a resident feeding another resident utilizing the same utensil that he was using to eat with. This affected two residents (#15 and #57) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition/ hydration and had the potential to affect 35 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #9, #12, #14, #16, #18, #19, #20, #24, #25, #29, #31, #34, #35, #40, #44, #50, #52, #57, #59, #60, #68, #75, #77, #80, #90, #91, #92, #95 #97, and #99) residing on the secured units four and five. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 01/13/14 with diagnoses including intellectual disability, alcohol-induced persisting dementia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had impaired cognition as his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a four. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 106 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility posted staffing information for July 2023 revealed there was no RN in the facility on 07/22/23 and 07/23/23. Interview on 08/16/23 at 2:17 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #418 who completed scheduling duties verified the facility did not have a RN in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours on 07/22/23 and 07/23/23 as required. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00145230.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, review of the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Memo QSO-20-14-NH (revised 3/10/21), review of the World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene brochure, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned for Resident #452, who was on quarantine precautions, and hand hygiene was consistently implemented to potentially prevent the spread of infections for Resident #4 while preforming wound care. This had the potential to affect all 106 residents of the facility. The facility had no active COVID-19 cases. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #452 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment was currently in progress. Further record review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
5. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 5/22/20 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of lower respiratory tract, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of the MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 06/01/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was independent for activities of daily living. Resident #14 had an ostomy bag. Observation on 08/30/21 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Resident #14 was sitting in his wheelchair wearing a hospital gown. Further observation revealed many flies on the resident's sheets, and the bed linens were dirty. Interview on 08/30/21 at 11:06 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #69 verified that the bed linens were dirty, and there were flies in the room. This deficiency substantiates Master Complaint Number OH00114343. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 09/01/21 with diagnoses including diabetes, polyneuropathy (a malfunction of nerves throughout the body), and abnormal gait. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 08/09/21, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-02 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility protocol review, the facility failed to ensure handrails were firmly secured to the wall. This affected 28 residents (Resident's #3, #4, #5, #17, #19, #24, #25, #31, #35, #42, #46, #47, #54, #55, #58, #61, #70, #71, #79, #80, #81, #82, #85, #90, #93, #94, #100, #151, #152) located on Unit 4. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Observation on 09/02/21 at 9:07 A.M. of Unit 4, located on the second floor of the facility, revealed a handrail located next to the elevator adjacent to the nursing station and near room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose and not affixed firmly to the wall. Observation on 09/02/21 at 9:08 A.M. of Unit 4, also revealed a handrail between rooms #404 and #405 was not affixed to the wall securely. Interview on 09/02/21 at 10:30 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #55 confirmed the handrails were not securely affixed to the wall. LPN #55 revealed she walked and observed both handrails not securely fastened to the wall. LPN #55 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-02 · tag F0570 — isolatedAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the surety bond, trial balance funds sheet and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a surety bond large enough to cover the total amount of money in all resident personal funds accounts. This had the potential to affect all 106 residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's surety bond revealed it was in the amount of $32,000.00. Review of the resident trial balance funds documented the total money in the resident funds account totaled $127,362.18. Interview on 09/01/21 at 8:30 A.M. the Administrator verified the amount of monies in the resident funds account exceeded the amount of the surety bond.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have complete and accurate care plans. This affected two (Resident's #4 and #70) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 106. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/20/19 with diagnoses including morbid (severe) obesity, age-related physical debility, other neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, other depressive episodes, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the physician's order dated 06/09/21 revealed facility staff and hospice staff were to pad and protect all wounds. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/17/21, revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #4 had two unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcers, one unstageable deep tissue injury (persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration of intact or non-intact skin), and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and guidelines for administering medication, and manufacture instructions the facility failed to administer medication according to professional standards. This affected two residents (Resident #18 and Resident #29) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 106. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 02/25/16 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (a low level of thyroid hormone), schizophrenia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/10/21, revealed Resident #18 had impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders for September 2021 revealed and order for Levothyroxine 150 microgram (mcg) for low thyroid level, Buspar 10 milligram (mg) for anxiety and Gabapentin 400 mg to stabilize mood. Observation on 09/01/21 at 7:18 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #54 administering medications to Resident #18 revealed she prepared the three medications. LPN #54 walked to the dining room and administered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40's hair was maintained after removal of her dreadlocks. This affected one of three Residents (#4, #40, #42) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 106. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, psychotic disorder with delusions, muscle weakness, and anxiety. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with personal hygiene. Observation on 08/31/21 at 10:48 A.M. revealed the resident was seated in the common area with other residents. Resident #40 was noted to be dressed but not groomed. The resident's hair was noted to be matted in the back and sticking straight up on the top. Interview on 08/31/21 at 11:03 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #76 and the resident revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to complete wound care as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 106. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/20/19 with diagnoses including morbid (severe) obesity, age-related physical debility, other neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, depressive episodes, type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #4 had two unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcers, one unstageable deep tissue injury (persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration of intact or non-intact skin), and a suprapubic catheter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-02 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was provided with eating equipment to maintain independence while eating. This affected one (Resident #3) of 29 residents (Resident's #3, #6, #7, #8, #10, #16, #20, #21, #26, #31, #35, #36, #38, #47, #49, #57, #60, #63, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #80, #83, #84, and #86) who required adaptive devices. The facility census was 106. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/06/20 and readmission date of 02/09/21. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, bipolar, and unspecified lack of coordination. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required limited assist of one staff for eating. Review of the physician's orders for September 2021 revealed orders for Kennedy cups (a lightweight spill proof drinking cup), individual bowls and a small maroon spoon at all meals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-25 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a full-time social worker. This had the potential to affect all 99 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Record review of the current staff list provided by the facility revealed it did not identify any social worker employed at the facility.Interview with Assistant Director of Nursing #504 on 06/23/26 at 11:56 A.M. revealed the facility had not had a full-time social worker since roughly January 2026. A corporate social worker was in the building occasionally to assist with needs, and other staff including nurse management pitched in to assist with social work needs.Interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #505 on 06/23/26 at 12:10 P.M. revealed the facility had no social worker except a corporate worker who came weekly. BOM #505 and other staff members assisted with various social work activities.Interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/23/26 at 3:37 P.M. revealed the facility previously had a social worker who would come on weekends to do work; however, she was terminated roughly ten days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$109,991 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $109,991 — penalty dated 2024-06-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 GSR DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2020 |
| AARON HANDLER FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2020 |
| AH DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2020 |
| GEORGE S. REPCHICK 2020 FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2020 |
| HANDLER, AARON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2009 |
| REPCHICK, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2020 |
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| CERJAN, KAYLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| LELE, SHREENIWAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $508K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365306. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.