Embassy Of East Mountain
101 East Mountain Drive, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (570) 825-5892 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.6% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.4% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.84 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.2%CMS range 40.1–53.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.1–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.6–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of select facility policies and information submitted by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate staff supervision of a resident to monitor the resident's whereabouts and timely identify the resident's absence from the facility to assure prompt implementation of established procedures for a missing resident, which placed the resident in immediate jeopardy for one out of 19 residents sampled (Resident 26). Following this elopement the facility further failed to promptly identify the resident's absence as well as identify supervisory and safety needs to prevent unsupervised exits from the facility, which placed residents in immediate jeopardy of unsupervised exits from the facility and the potential for serious bodily injury or death. Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Elopement and Wandering Residents, last reviewed January 16, 2025, revealed it was the policy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, payor source data, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure timely and necessary dental services for one resident who is a Medicaid recipient (Resident 1) out of 10 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility Ancillary Services policy last reviewed January 1, 2026, indicated it is the policy of the facility to assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency ancillary services as needed. The policy defined emergency dental services as the need to treat an episode of pain in teeth, gums, or broken, damaged teeth, or any other problem that requires immediate attention by a dentist. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain's cavities) and weakness. A review of Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, the minutes from facility Resident Council meetings, and grievances filed with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings and verbal grievances, including those voiced by five of five residents attending a resident group meeting (Residents 51, 58, 63, 73, and 99) and failed to keep the residents apprised of the status of the facility's decisions and efforts toward grievance resolution.Findings include: A review of the facility's Grievance Policy last reviewed on January 16, 2025, indicated the residents', families, and their representatives have the right to voice grievances concerning care and treatment, behavior of staff or other residents or any concerns regarding their stay. Further stating the grievance official will keep the resident apprised of progress of resolution of grievance. A review of the Minutes from a Resident Council meeting, which included a food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in two out of three resident shower rooms (East and West). Findings include: During a resident council meeting on January 7, 2026, at 10:10 AM, interviews with five cognitively intact residents, Residents 73, 51, 58, 63, and 99, it was reported during the month of December through present, the temperatures inside the East shower room was frequently cold and uncomfortable and the [NAME] shower room's hot water intermittently went cold during showers and was uncomfortable. All residents reported nursing staff were aware, but nothing was addressed. During an observation of the [NAME] shower room with facility's maintenance director on January 7, 2026, at 10:55 AM, observed contractors and the regional maintenance director investigating issues with the water heating system. An interview with Employee 2, a nurse aide, January 7, 2026, at 11:02 AM, revealed staff were able to complete some resident showers in the [NAME] shower room but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of scheduled activities and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents including experiences expressed by five out of five residents during a resident group interview (Residents 51, 58, 63, 73, and 99).Findings include: During a resident group interview conducted on January 7, 2026, at 10:00 AM, five out of five residents interviewed (Residents 51, 58, 63, 73, and 99) expressed concerns regarding the lack of available activities within the facility. Residents stated there were no meaningful activities being offered that aligned with their interests. Resident 51, identified as the Resident Council President, reported that all activity staff had either resigned or were no longer employed by the facility. Resident 51 further stated that the most recent activity offered was BINGO on Monday, January 5, 2026, which was facilitated by a nurse aide due to the absence of activity department staff. All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to employ and maintain a qualified activities director.Findings include: Review of facility documentation: job description Activity Director: The primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop, direct and implement the overall operation of the Activity Department in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that an on-going program of activities is designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. During an interview on January 7, 2026, at 1:00 PM with the Director of Nursing and Regional Nurse Consultant, it was reported the Activities Director left employment on December 31, 2025. The DON and Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed that since December 31, 2025, there has been no activities director. An individual has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide snacks as desired by residents, including experiences reported by five out of five residents during a group interview (Residents 73, 51, 58, 63, and 99).Findings included: During a resident group interview with cognitively intact residents, Residents 73, 51, 58, 63, and 99, on January 7, 2026, at 10:10 AM, reported since a decrease in the facility's activity department staffing, no evening/bedtime snacks were being passed to residents and would like to receive an evening/bedtime snack. The residents reported after dinner activities staff would obtain snacks from the dietary department and come around to each unit to pass snacks as per resident preference. However, this process had not been occurring for about three weeks. Observations of the [NAME] resident pantry on January 7, 2026, at 11:15 AM, revealed inside the cupboards only two open boxes of oatmeal cream pies and cookies available for residents and not enough for all residing on the unit. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of select facility policies and job descriptions, information submitted by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure effective administrative oversight to maintain systems necessary to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent resident elopement. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health and safety of one resident (Resident 26) out of 19 residents sampled and placed other residents at risk for serious bodily injury or death.Findings included: A review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) signed and dated July 7, 2025 revealed the NHA must be knowledgeable of and demonstrate the ability to provide quality care by fostering a safe environment for residents and staff; provide emotional and psychological support for the residents within the facility, direct and oversee the day to day operation of the facility to ensure the highest degree of quality of care is maintained at all times in accordance with current state and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered per physician orders consistent with the professional standard of practice for one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 40).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to provide oxygen therapy to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice that are comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. The policy indicates oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. Personnel authorized to initiate oxygen therapy include physicians, RNs, LPNs, and respiratory therapists according to the policy. A clinical record review revealed Resident 40 was admitted to the facility April 15, 2024, with diagnoses that include peripheral vascular disease (a disorder of the blood vessels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician review and oversight of recommendations provided by a consulting medical specialist for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 11).Findings include:Review of the policy titled 'Suprapubic Catheter Placement' last reviewed January 16, 2025, indicated it is the policy of the facility to reinsert a suprapubic catheter when there appears to be a drainage problem and or when directed by a physician.A clinical record review reveals Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of permanent atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). From February 13, 2025, to February 22, 2025, Resident 11 was hospitalized for sepsis (a potentially life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs).Review of a document from the acute care facility, titled Consult - Urology dated February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards and manufacturer recommendations. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that multi-dose medication vials were labeled with an open date on two of two nursing areas (East Hall Medication Room and [NAME] Hall Medication Room).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration and Medication Storage, last reviewed [DATE], indicated that medications and biologicals (medications derived from living organisms) are to be stored safely, securely, and in accordance with manufacturer or supplier instructions. The policy further indicated that multi-dose vials (containers intended for multiple uses after initial entry) must be dated when first opened or accessed (for example, punctured by a needle) and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, resident representative and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that is not possible for one out of four residents sampled (Resident CR1).Findings include: A facility policy titled Weight Monitoring, dated October 1, 2024, revealed it is the facility's policy that based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. The resident and/or resident representative will be involved in the development of the care plan to ensure it is individualized and meets personal goals and preferences. Interventions will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and residents' financial account records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to return the personal funds of one discharged resident (Resident CR1) within 30 days of discharge, for one of 12 residents reviewed. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on January 2, 2025. A review of the resident's financial account statement, provided by the facility and dated June 1, 2025, revealed a credit balance of $12,743.00 remained on the account, indicating funds belonging to Resident CR1 had not been disbursed within 30 days of the resident's discharge. Further review included an email, provided to the surveyor, from the Regional Business Office Manager (RBOM) dated May 29, 2025, which stated the facility's Business Office Manager was terminated on March 4, 2025, due to poor performance. The RBOM subsequently assumed responsibility for financial operations at this facility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0660 — patternPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized discharge plan for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 252 and 81) to reflect the residents' discharge goals. Findings Include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (a degenerative disease of the liver resulting in scarring and liver failure). Review of an admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process completed at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 17, 2024, indicated the resident had a BIMS (brief interview mental screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 251's social service notes, revealed a note dated December 11, 2024, indicating the resident would like to be discharged home when able. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards to the extent possible in three of three resident hallways Findings include: During an observation conducted on March 4, 2025, at 10:00 AM, the following environmental hazards were identified: In the 200 hallway, three linen carts were positioned at the end of the hallway on the same side, obstructing access to the handrails. Additionally, four linen carts were lined up against the wall in the hallway connecting the 100 and 200 hallways, further occluding the handrails. A floor cleaning machine was also present in this hallway, on the same side, blocking access to the handrails. This hallway included access to the resident dining room, an area of frequent resident traffic. In the 100 resident hallway, plastic storage bins with three drawers, containing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as face masks, gloves, and gowns, were observed in front of resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to store Oxygen in a safe and secure manner. Findings include: A review of a select facility policy for Oxygen safety, last reviewed January 1, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide a safe environment for residents, staff and the public. This policy addresses the use and storage of oxygen equipment. Oxygen storage locations shall be in an enclosure or within an enclosed interior space of non-combustible or limited combustible construction, with doors or gates that can be secured against unauthorized entry. Precautionary signs readable from 5 feet shall be maintained on the door or gate where oxygen is used or stored. (Example: OXYGEN STORED WITHIN-NO SMOKING) On March 4, 2025, at 9:00 A.M., seven full oxygen cylinders were observed in a multi-tank rack on wheels (not secured to the wall or floor) positioned on the right side of the hallway. Five empty oxygen tanks were stored in a similar multi-tank rack on wheels (not secured to the wall or floor) on the left side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of pharmacy services to assure the timely receipt and administration of physician-prescribed medications for three (3) of twenty-one (21) residents reviewed (Residents 90, 64, and 201). The facility also failed to implement a process for providing pharmacy services, including access to emergency medications when not available onsite, and failed to maintain oversight of the facility's medication dispensing system. Findings include: Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 90, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], at 10:45 AM with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, and anxiety. A physician order dated February 4, 2025, documented an order for Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) 1 mg by mouth twice daily for a diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's automated emergency medication system, applicable state regulations, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State, and Local laws and professional standards by not ensuring pharmacy services necessary for daily pharmacy operations according to state requirements of Pa. Code title 49. Findings include: A review of Pennsylvania Code title 49, part I, subpart A, chapter 27 - STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, 49 Pa. Code § 27.204 - Automated medication systems revealed: (a) This section establishes standards applicable to licensed pharmacies that utilize automated medication systems which may be used to store, package, dispense or distribute prescriptions. (b) A pharmacy may use an automated medication system to fill prescriptions or medication orders provided that: (1) The pharmacist manager, or the pharmacist under contract with a long-term care facility responsible for the dispensing of medications if an automated medication system is utilized at a location which does not have a pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident 25). Findings included: A review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A current physician order initially dated April 30, 2024, noted an order for Nutren 1.5 (liquid nutritional supplement) 45 ml/hour via peg tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube- feeding tube surgically placed through the abdomen into the stomach, allowing direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II resident review for one out of 21 residents (Resident 81). Findings include: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long-term care. The PASRR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be given a preliminary assessment to determine whether they might have serious mental illness before admission. This is called a PASRR Level I screen. Those individuals who test positive for PASRR Level I are then evaluated in-depth; this is called PASRR Level II. The results of this evaluation result in a determination of need, a determination of an appropriate setting, and a set of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, information submitted by the facility, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect the resident's current needs and services required by one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: Review of the clinical record of Resident 81 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include depression, and anxiety. On September 26, 2024, at 3:00 PM, nursing documentation indicated that Resident 81 expressed suicidal thoughts and, when asked if he would act upon them, responded, it all depends. The resident was offered emotional support and was asked if he would seek staff assistance before harming himself, to which he responded that he could not make any promises. The physician assistant was contacted, and an order was obtained to transfer the resident to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation. The resident, as his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide restorative nursing services as planned to maintain mobility for one resident (Resident 85) out of 21 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of the facility Restorative Nursing Services Policy last reviewed January 16, 2025, indicated a Restorative Nursing Program is utilized to assist residents to achieve and/or maintain their optimal functional level consistent with their capabilities, goals, and preferences. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (physical, occupational, or speech therapies). Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of a stay or when discharge from rehabilitative care. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to promote the mental and psychosocial well-being of two residents out of 21 sampled (Resident 251 and Resident 81). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include alcoholism and a history of suicidal ideations. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process completed at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated January 15, 2025, indicated the resident had a BIMS (brief interview mental screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Further review of the clinical record indicated the resident expressed a strong desire to be discharged home, but his wife opposed the discharge. The resident frequently voiced frustration and agitation about wanting to leave the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and resident payor source data, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to offer routine annual dental services for two private payor source residents (Residents 60 and 39) out of four residents sampled for dental services. Findings include: Review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on January 15, 2021, with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). The resident was identified as private payor source. Review of Resident 60's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to identify specific resident care needs) dated February 9, 2025, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record at the time of the survey ending March 7, 2025, that Resident 60's responsible party was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and resident payor source data, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to offer routine annual dental services for one Medicaid payor source resident (Resident 64) out of four residents sampled for dental services. Findings include: Review of Resident 64's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 21, 2023 with diagnosis to include dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart that leads to build-up of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues). The resident was identified as Medicaid payor source. Review of Resident 64's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to identify specific resident care needs) dated November 18, 2024, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure coordination of Hospice services with facility services to meet each individual residents' needs daily for the management of a terminal illness of one of two residents reviewed receiving hospice services. (Resident 54 and 61). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarct (stroke). The resident was admitted to hospice services on February 5, 2025, for cerebral infarct. Review of Resident 54's plan of care, during the survey ending March 7, 2025, revealed no evidence the resident's plan of care was integrated with hospice services to demonstrate coordination of care and services to meet the resident's needs related to the care of the resident's terminal illness daily. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy and minutes from Resident Council and Food Committee meetings and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints/grievances expressed during Resident Council and Food Committee Meetings and submitted grievances, including those voiced by four of 4 residents (Residents 16, 37, 81, and 50). Findings include: Review of the facility's current Grievance policy indicated that it is the facility's policy to provide an opportunity for residents to express concerns at any time. The facility's goal is to resolve resident and family concerns in a timely basis. Review of the minutes from the December 2023, through March 2024, Resident Council and Food Committee meetings revealed that residents in attendance at these resident group meetings voiced their concerns regarding resident care and facility services during the meetings. During the December 2023, Resident Council meeting the residents relayed concerns that the shower water temperature was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select facility policy and clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents were provided with the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, by failing to provide showers as scheduled and personal grooming for three of 23 residents sampled (Residents 5, 7 and 47). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Shower/Bathing Policy last reviewed by the facility on February 15, 2024, indicated the purpose of the policy was to cleanse and refresh the resident. If the resident refuses a shower, a bed bath will be offered and provided as per the resident's preference. Care plan documentation guidelines include list the amount of assistance the resident needs with bathing and any resident preferences, precautions, special soap, or lotion to be used. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis ([MS] immune…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards on the East and [NAME] Hallways. Findings include: An observation of the 100 East hallway on April 9, 2024, at 9:16 AM and again on April 10, 2024, at 8:48 AM revealed 3 rollator walkers, 5 wheelchairs, a resident room armchair, a stool and a large linen cart were lined up blocking access to the handrails on the right side of the corridor. These items completely obstructed resident access to the hand railing on the right side of the hallway. Observations at that time revealed multiple residents self-propelling in wheelchairs in the hallway. During an interview April 12, 2024, at 12:00 PM the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the handrails on the right side of hallway were obstructed and that residents did not have unimpeded access to the handrails on the right side of the corridor to assist with ambulation and mobility on that side of the hall. An observation conducted on April 10, 2024, at approximately 1:05 PM, revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently administer oxygen as ordered and maintain sanitary oxygen delivery systems for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 47). Findings included: According to the American Thoracic Society, O2 is a medication that requires a prescription from a healthcare provider. The provider will prescribe your O2 at a specific flow rate and a specific number of hours per day. It is very important that O2 is used as prescribed. Using too little O2 may put a strain on the heart and brain, causing heart failure, fatigue, or memory loss. Using too much O2 can also be a problem. For some patients, using too much O2 can cause them to slow their breathing to dangerously low levels. It is important to wear O2 as your provider ordered it. If the patient starts to experience headaches, confusion, or increased sleepiness after using supplemental O2, the patient may be getting too…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Initial tour of the food and nutrition services department in the presence of the foodservice director (FSD) on April 9, 2024, at 8:00 AM, revealed the following sanitation concerns with the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a significant change Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual dated October 2023 a Significant Change in Status MDS assessment is required within 14 days of the determination of the significant change when: o A resident enrolls in a hospice program; or o A resident changes hospice providers and remains in the facility; or o A resident receiving hospice services discontinues those services; or o A resident experiences a consistent pattern of changes, with either two or more areas of decline or two or more areas of improvement, from baseline (as indicated by comparison of the resident's current status to the most recent CMS-required MDS). A review of the clinical record of Resident 19 revealed that the resident had experienced a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 23 sampled (Residents 32). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual dated October 2023, Section A 1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is to be completed if the type of assessment is an admission assessment, significant change, or annual assessment. The annual MDS Assessment of Resident 32 dated June 23, 2023, revealed Section A 1500 was coded as 0 indicating that the resident was not considered by the State to require a Level II PASRR process, to have serious mental illness, and/or intellectual disability or mental retardation or a related condition. A review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed a Level I PASRR was completed on June 1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan in response to the discontinuation of Hospice services (a type of care and philosophy of care that focuses on the palliation of a chronically ill, terminally ill or seriously ill patient's pain and symptoms, attending to their emotional and spiritual needs) for one resident out of 23 reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed that the resident had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). A review of the resident's comprehensive plan of care initiated January 16, 2023, revealed that the resident was receiving Hospice services due to end stage COPD. Further review of the clinical record revealed that Hospice services were discontinued on February 25, 2024. The facility failed to revise and update the resident's care plan when Hospice services were discontinued. An interview with the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: A review of Resident 34's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia with agitation (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change). A review of Resident 34's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated March 7, 2024, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and displayed physical behavioral symptoms (hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching) and verbal behavioral symptoms (threatening,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on three of three resident units (West Wing, East Wing and Alzheimer Care Unit). Findings included: An observation on January 9, 2024, at 9:45 AM of the [NAME] Wing front hallway revealed a weight scale on the floor littered with used disposable gloves, crumbled paper and used tissues. An observation on January 9, 2024, at 9:50 AM of the [NAME] Wing Day room revealed an unknown white substance splattered on two walls, the wall to left of entry and the wall by the sink, An unknown red substance was observed on the sink top, food particles were observed in the sink, an empty hand sanitizer dispenser and an unknown orange substance were observed on the floor and tabletop. An observation on January 9, 2024, at 10:10 AM, in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a pile of peas and carrots, a paper towel, a plastic cup, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide meal service in an environment that maintains each resident's dignity as evidenced by two residents out of six sampled (Residents 9 and 36). Findings include: An observation conducted on January 9, 2024, at approximately 11:50 AM revealed lunch delivery service in the [NAME] Wing Day room. Observation revealed multiple residents in the dining room awaiting the lunch meal service. Observation revealed that staff served meals and assisted all residents present with tray set-up, except Residents 9 and Resident 36, who continued to wait for their meals to be served and were watching the other residents eat. A review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired and required setup assistance for her meals. Resident 9 was observed seated at a table with Resident 16. Resident 16 was served her tray and was eating her meal at 11:50 AM. Resident 9 did not have a meal tray and was observed asking staff repeatedly Where's my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect the resident's current needs and services required by one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 73). Findings include: Review of the clinical record of Resident 73 revealed initial admission to the facility on February 1, 2023, with diagnoses to include diabetes, depression, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) of Resident 73 dated November 16, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 (13-15 represents intact cognitive responses). According to the assessment, Section D0150. Resident Mood Interview, the resident did not have thoughts that he would be better off dead or of hurting himself in some way during the assessment look back period. A review of Resident 73's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of pest control records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and act upon recommendations of the professional pest control services to prevent infestation. Findings include: Observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (semi-private) on September 27, 2023, at approximately 10:30 AM, revealed what appeared to multiple mouse droppings, in the dresser drawer and behind the dresser located at the door side of the resident room. There was a rodent bait station placed on the floor behind the dresser in this room. A review of monthly pest control management service records revealed that services were provided to the facility as follows: On August 21, 2023- the interior and exterior of the facility were inspected. Interior and exterior rodent bait stations and snap traps were rebaited. Two mice captured inside. The service record identified a hole in the kitchen back door sweep that needs to be fixed as soon as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility-initiated transfer notices, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer in writing and in a language and manner they understand and to provide copies of written notice of facility-initiated hospital transfers of residents to a representative of the Office of the State Ombudsman for two out of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 11 & Resident 41). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further clinical record review revealed Resident 11 was transferred to a community hospital on August 29, 2025, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A clinical record review revealed Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further clinical record review revealed Resident 41 was transferred to a community hospital on December 16, 2026, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility was unable to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- GSR DYNASTY LLC — private equity · 50.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPH WILKES-BARRE EAST MOUNTAIN LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| HANDLER, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2024 |
| LEVULIS, LORREE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| REPCHICK, GEORGE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/2024 |
| ANDREWS, HEATHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| LINAM, KIM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
| BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| BEVERLY ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| DRUMM INTERMEDIARY SUB CO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| DRUMM MERGER CO | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARD | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2024 |
| MCILVRIED, ROBB | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395706. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.