No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Forest Hills Center

2841 East Dublin-Granville Road, Columbus, OH 43231 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (614) 891-1111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 891-1111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5869 Cleveland Ave · (614) 794-9600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5680 Columbus Sq · (614) 890-0870 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5644 Columbus Sq · (614) 818-4499 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5468 Aqua St · (614) 645-3300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2891 E Dublin Granville Rd · (614) 794-1192

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.1%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.6%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.9%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.2%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.0%1.2%1.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
25.0%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, facility record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified activities professional. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the facility Activity Director job description revealed the primary purpose of the position was to plan, organize, develop, direct, and implement the overall operation of the activity department to ensure an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Continued review revealed the Activity Director must be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist, a licensed activities professional, possess qualifying experience in a patient activities program, be a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant, or have completed an approved training course. Review of the personnel file for Activity Director #192 revealed the there was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affected 72 out of 72 residents who receive their meals from the kitchen, the facility identified two (#9 and #55) residents who do not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Observation on 06/03/26 at 12:03 P.M. revealed food temperatures for the regular texture chicken was 191.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F), regular texture vegetable was 196 degrees F, and regular sweet potato was 197 degrees F. Observation on 06/03/26 from 12:19 P.M. to 1:00 P.M. revealed during tray line facility had warming shells (tops and bases) to keep food warm. It was observed staff were using only one piece (either the top or the bottom but not both). The staff also ran out of trays and had to wait for several trays to be collected from the dining room and washed before being used for another resident for lunch service. Observation and interview 06/03/26 at 12:55 P.M. revealed test tray was plated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, resident council review, personnel file review, and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) review, the facility failed to effectively administer the facility by failing to ensure the activities program was directed by qualified personnel and failing to ensure residents received an activity program that addressed their assessed interests, preferences, and psychosocial well-being. In addition, the facility failed to implement effective corrective actions to achieve compliance after the facility's QAPI program identified concerns related to activity programming and staffing. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74.Findings Included:Review of the personnel file for Activity Director #192 failed to reveal documentation demonstrating the individual met the qualifications required to direct the facility's activities program. Further review revealed the facility had been without a Certified Activity Assistant since 04/07/26.Observations conducted throughout the survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, personnel file review, observation, and review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective QAPI program by failing to identify, monitor, and implement effective corrective actions regarding deficiencies in the facility's activity program. The facility identified concerns related to activity programming and staffing through its QAPI process; however, residents continued to experience limited activity programming and the facility failed to ensure the individual directing the activity program met required qualifications. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility.Findings Included:Interview with the Administrator on 06/08/26 at 2:23 P.M. revealed the facility's QAPI committee routinely reviewed quality measures, resident concerns, staffing concerns, activity programming, employee retention, and operational issues affecting resident care. The Administrator stated activity programming and staffing concerns were areas currently being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for all residents except those who eat in the dining room. Facility identified 27 Residents (#1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #12, #27, #34, #37, #43, #44, #50, #54, #56, #58, #60, #61, #62, #64, #65, #66, #67, #71, #73, and #74) who eat in the dining room. Facility census was 74. Findings include: Observations on 06/01/26 at approximately 9:00 A.M. revealed residents who did not eat in the dining room were served their meal in the sitting nook on bedside tables that were pulled out from the rooms and/or stored in the corner of the sitting nook. Residents were not provided a stable table to sit at. Resident's food was left on the serving tray and the food covers were not removed for the resident's.Observations on 06/01/26 at approximately 12:45 P.M. revealed residents who did not eat in the dining room were served their meal in the sitting nook on bedside tables. Residents were not provided a stable table to sit at, and were eating their food off bedside tables.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a home like environment by ensuring residents had maintained personal property/personal items This affected one resident (#26) of five reviewed for environment, the facility also failed to ensure the linen provided did not have holes in it this affected one resident (#50) of five reviewed for environment. Facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 01/05/24. Diagnoses included dementia without behaviors, psychotic disturbance, vascular dementia, dysphagia and pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99 indicating impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 01/06/25 revealed resident needed encouragement to participate in activities of interest and preferred self-directed activities such as listening to music in his room. The care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests, preferences, and psychosocial needs of residents. This affected four residents (#5, #28, #35, and #54) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 74. 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential hypertension, weakness, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, and right hip fracture. Review of the quarterly Care Conference Summary dated 01/22/26 revealed Resident #35 enjoyed socializing within the unit, watching television, and attending movie and popcorn activities. The review further documented the resident generally refused daily group activities but tolerated one-to-one activities. Review of the Activities Quarterly/Annual Participation Review dated 02/25/26 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, facility failed to ensure furniture was maintained in a safe manner. This affected 25 Residents (#4, #7, #9, #12, #16, #18, #19, #23, #26, #30, #31, #36, #42, #45, #47, #49, #61, #62, #64, #66, #68, #69, #70, #72, and #75) living in the third hall. Facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation and interview on 06/01/26 at 10:20 A.M. and 11:28 A.M. revealed the third hall nook had a variety of chairs and couches sitting against the wall. A chair had damage on the arm with the wood framing exposed that was rough. A couch was also damaged with torn/peeling fabric. Interview and observation on 06/03/26 at 1:50 P.M. confirmed the chair in the third hall nook was damaged with exposed wood and a couch in the third hall nook had torn fabric. The Registered Nurse (RN) #199 confirmed residents pick at the furniture and caused the ripped material. She confirmed residents were sitting in the damaged chair and couch and could not remember for how long they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure choice was offered for hospice services provider. This affected one resident, (#2) of one residents reviewed for hospice. The facility census was 74.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 07/20/18 with diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbance, Diabetes Mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic autonomic neuropathy, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, severe with psychotic symptoms and chronic kidney disease stage V. Review of physician orders for Resident #2 revealed an order dated 04/02/26 to admit to Hospice #333 for end stage renal disease. Review of the care plan dated 04/02/26 revealed resident/family has elected hospice care. Admit to Hospice #333 for diagnosis of end stage renal stage. Interventions included all resident/family wishes will be maintained in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide spend down notices when resident's personal funds account reached $200 less than the Social Security Insurance resource limit. This affected two residents, (Resident #26 and Resident #47) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1.Resident #26 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that included dementia, psychotic disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was unable to complete an interview to assess mental status. Review of the facility's quarterly statement of resident funds for Resident #26 indicated an ending balance of $4234.16 on 03/31/26. Review of the spend down notice for Resident #26 dated 04/23/26 revealed the Resident Fund balance was within $200 or was exceeding what is allowable under Medical Assistance. Interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #216 on 06/02/26 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician and family were notified of a change in condition. This affected oneresident, (#36) of one reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/22/26. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, failure to thrive and edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99 indicating resident was rarely if ever understood. The MDS stated Resident was dependent with most activities of daily living and required moderate to maximum assistance for mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 04/04/26 revealed resident had impaired cognitive process for daily decision making and was at risk for further decline in cognitive status.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure indications for use were appropriate for psychotropic medications for two residents, (#49 and #75) and the facility failed to ensure two residents (#2 and #49) were monitored for psychotropic medication side effects. This affected three out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident # 49's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/23 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, anxiety disorder, mood affect disorder, pseudobulbar affect, psychosis, and frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. Review of Resident # 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required total assistance from staff with toileting, transfers and hygiene. Further review revealed she received antipsychotics, antianxiety and antidepressant medications with indications for use noted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of injuries of unknown origin. This affected two residents (#20 and #83) of two reviewed for abuse investigations. Facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 04/10/26. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of lateral left fibula, right femur fracture, wedge compression fracture, dementia without behaviors, kidney disease, muscle weakness, and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of six indicating impaired cognition and required partial moderate assistance with activities of daily living.Review progress notes dated 04/14/26 revealed during morning rounds resident was observed to be lying in bed holding her right leg and yelling in pain. The resident was unable to state if she had fallen and a stat X-ray was ordered. The X-ray later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding a hospitalization and transfer for one resident (Resident #35) and failed to assist one resident (Resident #8) with discharge planning services. This affected two residents (#35 and #8) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 74. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential hypertension, and right hip fracture. Review of hospital records revealed Resident #35 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] following a fall on 05/12/26 which resulted in right hip pain. Continued review revealed Resident #35 was diagnosed with a right femur fracture and underwent a right hip hemiarthroplasty on 05/14/26. The resident returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident representative interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was created for communication and language services for Resident #36, contractures for Resident #55, and physical therapy services for Resident #84. This affected three (#36, #55 and #84) of 20 residents in the sample reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 74. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/22/26. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, failure to thrive and edema. Review of the plan of care dated 04/04/26 revealed resident had impaired cognitive process for daily decision making and was at risk for further decline in cognitive status with interventions to communicate with staff, family, physician and the resident regarding the resident's needs and obtain input from family and friends. The care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident representative interviews and policy review, facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed as required and completed as scheduled. This affected two (#36 and #35) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/22/26. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, failure to thrive and edema. Review of the plan of care dated 04/04/26 revealed resident had impaired cognitive process for daily decision making and was at risk for further decline in cognitive status with interventions to communicate with staff, family, physician and the resident regarding the resident's needs and obtain input from family and friends. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and family interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure communication and language services were provided to a resident who did not understand or speak English. This affected one (#36) of one residents reviewed for language/communication. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/22/26. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, failure to thrive and edema. Review of the plan of care dated 04/04/26 revealed resident had impaired cognitive process for daily decision making and was at risk for further decline in cognitive status with interventions to communicate with staff, family, physician and the resident regarding the resident's needs and obtain input from family and friends. The care plan dated 05/01/26 revealed no care plan for communication or language and no interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of an ordered diagnostic test following a fall for one resident (Resident #35) reviewed for quality of care. This affected one (#35) of one residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential hypertension, weakness, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, and right hip fracture. Review of Resident #35's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed prior to the fall revealed the resident required staff assistance with activities of daily living but remained mobile within the facility. The assessment further revealed Resident #35 was able to transfer with staff assistance and ambulate 10 feet. Review of facility documentation revealed Resident #35 sustained a fall on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess newly identified pressure ulcers. This affected one (#64) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident # 64's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/09/23 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, encephalopathy, anxiety, dementia, mood disorder and intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident # 64's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Review of Resident # 64's comprehensive care plan dated 01/28/26 revealed a potential for alteration in skin integrity: requiring protective/preventative measures care plan with interventions that included but were not limited to:Place a pillow between legs when in bed to ensure pressure reduction.Encourage to float heels as toleratedPressure reduction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed timely by qualified staff after a fall, and before being moved by staff. This affected two (#4 and #47) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 04/23/26. Diagnoses included left femur fracture, Parkinson's, dementia, muscle weakness, unspecified psychosis, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, heart disease and arthritis. Review of the plan of care dated 04/24/26 revealed resident was at risk for falls with interventions including use assistive device for transfers and ambulation and bed to be in low position with floor mat in place. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99 indicating impaired cognition and required extensive/dependent assistance from staff members for activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly administer and care for a resident's tube feeding. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for tube feeding care. The facility census was 74.Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include duodenal ulcer, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicates the Resident was rarely/never understood and the Resident used a feeding tube. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed on order on 05/19/26 for enteral nutrition every 24 hours via pump Glucerna 1.2 at 65 milliliters per hour (mL/hr) for 22 hours (9 A.M. to 7 A.M.) via pump per feeding tube or until 1,430 mL infused. An order written 05/11/26 states every shift for enteral feeding to check feeding tube placement before initiation of formula, medication administration, and flushing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure drinks were provided regularly and upon resident request. This affected one (#26) of one residents reviewed for hydration. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 01/05/24. Diagnoses included dementia without behaviors, psychotic disturbance, vascular dementia, dysphagia and pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99 indicating impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 01/20/26 for alteration in nutrition with interventions to provide favorite foods and fluids. Further review of Resident #26's medical record revealed there was no order for fluid restrictions. Observation and interview on 06/01/26 at 11:28 A.M. with Resident #26 revealed he had no drinks or hydration in his room and he requested a drink from staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, review of facility investigations, review of facility Self Reported Incidents (SRI) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown sources in a timely manner to the State agency. This affected four of four residents (Residents #7, #11, #14, and #18) reviewed for injuries of unknown sources. The facility census was 72 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed that Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and dementia. Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #7 was assessed as being dependent for mobility and for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 03/16/24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, review of facility investigations and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown sources. This affected three (Residents #7, #11, and #14) of four residents reviewed for injuries of unknown sources. The facility census was 72 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed that Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and dementia. Review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #7 was assessed as being dependent for mobility and for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 03/16/24 and revised on 03/29/24 revealed that Resident #7 had an impaired cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-03 · tag F0555 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure residents were able to receive care and services from approved physicians only. This effected one (Resident #161) of the four residents reviewed for the right to choose their own care provider. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #161 revealed an admission date of 07/11/25 and a discharge date of 09/03/25. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #161's medical profile face sheet revealed under Instructions: For acute changes, resident will need to go to the emergency room. Do not contact facility physicians. Resident does not have an attending physician due to refusal for consent for treatment. Review of Resident #161's Care Conference Summary dated 07/14/25 with a lock date of 07/15/25 revealed the resident's legal guardian was present and indicated that the only ancillary service selected was dental and it indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility Self-Reported incident review, hospital record review, staff interview, observation, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident altercations resulting in injury as well as ensuring ordered stop signs in doorway openings were in place. This affected two (Resident #159 and #63) of the seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) tracking number #263862 dated 08/10/25 revealed there was an allegation of physical abuse between two residents. Per the nurse, two residents were heard screaming, the nurse quickly ran to the scene (in from of Resident #63 doorway) and immediately separated Resident #63 and #159. Enhanced supervision was provided for both residents, including one-on-one care for Resident #63. During Neurological checks and the head-to-toe assessment, the nurse discovered Resident #159 had a cut to her nose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Emergency Medical System (EMS) run report, review of the Certification and Licensure System (CALS), and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report injuries of unknown origin to the state agency for Residents #153 and #155 and failed to report a resident to resident incident involving Resident #63. This affected three residents (#63, #153, and #155) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.Findings include:1a. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #153 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, type II diabetes, unspecified mood disorder, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Care Plan entry dated 05/09/24 noted Resident #153 had the potential risk for falls related to cognitive function, decreased physical function, incontinence and medication. A goal was established for Resident #153 to be free…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigation report review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for injuries of unknown origin for residents #153 and #155, and failed to complete an investigation into a resident to resident altercation involving Resident #63. This affected three residents (#63, #153 and #155) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.Findings include:1a. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #153 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, type II diabetes, unspecified mood disorder, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Care Plan entry dated 05/09/24 noted Resident #153 had the potential risk for falls related to cognitive function, decreased physical function, incontinence and medication. A goal was established for Resident #153 to be free from injury. Interventions included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff schedule review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide registered nurse (RN) coverage as required. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of facility staff schedule, dated 07/14/24 to 08/31/24, revealed the following days did not have the proper RN coverage: 07/14/24 (no RN), 07/16/24 (no RN), 07/17/24 (no RN), 07/20/24 (no RN), 07/21/24 (no RN), 07/22/24 (no RN), 07/23/24 (no RN), 07/24/24 (no RN), 07/27/24 (only seven hours of RN coverage), 07/28/24 (no RN), 07/30/24 (no RN), 07/31/24 (no RN), 08/05/24 (only 5.25 hours of RN coverage), 08/07/24 (no RN), 08/10/24 (no RN), 08/14/24 (no RN), 08/19/24 (no RN), 08/20/24 (no RN), 08/21/24 (no RN), 08/24/24 (no RN), 08/25/24 (no RN), 08/27/24 (no RN), and 08/28/24 (no RN). Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/01/25 at 11:00 A.M. confirmed the dates listed above did not have proper RN coverage.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to obtain food temperatures in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Resident #3 consumed nothing by mouth. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/28/25 at 9:30 A.M. and on 04/30/25 at 11:45 A.M. revealed a large grate (about two feet by one foot) in front of the oven; the area under this grate was four to six inches deep. The area had a very thick layer of multiple black and brown substances, and the whole area appeared moist. All walls and surfaces underneath the grate were covered in this. Additionally, observation revealed the floor under equipment and around the edges of the kitchen had a buildup of dirt, food debris, and other items. A plastic cup was observed under the reach-in refrigerator on both occasions. Interview on 04/28/25 at 11:15 A.M. with [NAME] #175 revealed the area under the grate sometimes emitted a smell. Interview on 04/28/25 beginning at 11:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the laundry room in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 05/01/25 at 10:05 A.M. of the laundry room with Maintenance Director #117 revealed the washers were about a foot and a half to two feet from the back wall. All along the back wall were polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes and water lines leading from the washer to a drain. Everything from the wall to the pipes were covered in lint. On the floor were multiple wet spots including two puddles that had turned green. The floor around this area was black. In the dirty side of the laundry room, there was a sink with a buildup of dust, lint, and other debris. There were multiple areas of this floor that were cracked and peeling. Along the wall where the flooring was peeling, there was a buildup of dirt and leaves. Interview on 05/01/25 at 10:05 A.M. with Maintenance Director #117 verified the observation, and stated the area needed cleaned. The facility provided policy did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had appropriate diagnoses for psychological medications. This affected five residents (#35, #48, #50, #53, and #63) of nine residents reviewed for unnecessary medications or behavioral-emotional health services. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/05/25 with diagnoses including dementia, unspecified mood disorder, hypertension, unspecified fracture of first, second, third, and fourth lumbar vertebra, restlessness and agitation, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. No behaviors were indicated. Review of Resident #63's physician order dated 03/06/25 revealed an order for escitalopram oxalate 10 milligrams (mg), selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) antidepressant, one tablet by mouth in the morning for depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was present throughout the medical record for Resident #3. This affected one resident (#3) out of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, encephalopathy, aphasia, dysphagia, atherosclerosis, gastrostomy, major depressive disorder and psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of zero out of 15. Review of the current active orders for Resident #3 revealed an order for Full Code dated [DATE]. The banner on the electronic medical record indicated Resident #3 was a Full Code. Review of the care plan for Resident #3 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess Resident #53 prior to utilizing a physical restraint. This affected one resident (#53) out of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed that she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, pseudobulbar affect (PBA), anxiety, frontotemporal cognitive disorder, psychosis, major depressive disorder and mood disorder. Review of Resident #53's progress note, dated 01/12/25, revealed that Resident #53 started running and screaming in the hallway, and staff redirected her to her room. Review of physician's visit consult, dated 01/15/25, revealed that the physician dictated she has these very quick onset hyper episodes where she will run up and down the hallways, curse, push, shove, tear, pound on anything that comes in her way. These episodes usually last 30 minutes and then fade off. Sometimes just put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly monitor resident bruises. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. Also, the facility failed to implement wound orders in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #70) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung, dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, epilepsy, mood disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, aphasia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, major depressive disorder, vitamin D deficiency, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, low back pain, dysphagia, hypertension, psychosis, cognitive communication deficit, and urinary incontinence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had a significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #13. This affected one resident (#13) of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/20/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, aphasia, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety, unspecified psychosis, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition. He had one fall without injury during the lookback period. Review of Resident #13's plan of care dated 03/08/24 revealed he had the potential risk for falls related to cognitive function, decreased physical function, and medication use. Interventions included attempting to redirect with food and fluids, encourage frequent rest periods,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered for Resident #70 and notify the physician when the medication was unavailable. This affected one resident (#70) of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/03/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, aphasia, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, burn of unspecified region of body, vascular dementia, malignant neoplasm, acquired absence of right breast and nipple, and anxiety. Review of Resident #70's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #70's physician order dated 04/04/25 revealed an order for Butrans Transdermal Patch Weekly (Schedule III controlled substance for pain) one patch applied transdermally one time a day every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to monitor, thoroughly document, and prevent Resident #48's behaviors. This affected one resident (#48) of four residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/31/23 with diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbance, vascular dementia with agitation, atherosclerotic heart disease, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, delirium due to known physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, history of traumatic brain injury, and alcohol abuse. Review of Resident #48's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. He experienced behaviors of wandering and rejection of care during one to three days of the seven-day assessment reference period. Review of Resident #48's physicians order dated 05/10/24 revealed an order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, review of temperature logs, review of a Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) facility audit, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Third Street Unit and one room on the First Street Unit (room [ROOM NUMBER]) were maintained at a comfortable temperature for the residents who resided in those areas. The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #40) who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] and had the potential to affect one additional resident (Resident #2) who also resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] and all 28 residents who resided on the Third Street Unit (Residents #10,#15, #35, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #51, #52, #54, #56, #58, #61, #62, #64, #66, #68, #71, #73, #75, #77, #79, #85, #87, and #89). The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of the facility PTAC unit audit completed on 07/22/24 and 07/25/24 revealed there were three PTAC units which needed to be replaced. The units in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 311 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility-reported incident (FRI) investigation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow abuse policies and procedures when Residents #10 and #15 were left alone after a potential observation of abuse. The deficient practice affected two (Residents #10 and #15) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an original admission date of 11/15/21 and a readmission date on 12/12/22. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, restlessness and agitation, mood (affective) disorder, cognitive communication disorder, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was rarely or never understood. Per staff assessment, the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #10 was totally dependent on staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans to include activities and preferences. This affected two residents (Resident #17 and #66) of four residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/17/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, dementia, chronic kidney failure, and paranoid personality disorder. Resident #17 had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 and required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks, including transfers and mobility. Review of Resident #17's comprehensive care plan dated 05/17/24 revealed there was not an activity care plan or activity preferences completed for Resident #17. Interview on 06/25/24 at 11:53 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed Resident #17 did not have an activity care plan or activity preferences completed as part of the comprehensive care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, review the National Weather Forecast, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to prevent Resident #25 from eloping. This affected one (Resident #25) of three reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 revealed severe cognitive impairment. Resident #25 required supervision for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and did not not require any mobility devices. Review of the admission Assessment with Baseline Care Plan dated 04/26/24 revealed Resident #25 had impaired cognition and impaired cognition or decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interviews, review of the grievance log, review of a missing items concern form, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect Resident #74's belongings from being lost. This affected one resident (#74) of three reviewed for missing items. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the former Resident #74's closed medical record revealed an admission date on 11/21/23 and a discharge date on 12/14/23. Medical diagnoses included anxiety disorder, unsteadiness on feet, chronic kidney disease Stage 3, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 had impaired cognition and scored nine out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #74 required set-up or clean-up assistance with self-care activities of daily living (ADL), except bathing required partial to moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to properly track infections to identify infectious trends or patterns to prevent transmission. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents in the facility. Findings included: Record review revealed facility's infection control log did not contain a category regarding the type of organism in infections or whether the infection was facility acquired or the resident had the infection upon admission. The facility map for infections for each month did specify type of infection, such as urinary tract infection, skin infection, or respiratory infection but it did not detail which organism was growing in the infection. Interview on 07/27/23 at 1:10 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #460 confirmed the facility did not keep information of whether an infection was in house acquired or present upon admission on the log or the facility map. ADON #460 also stated trends in infections were only reviewed once a month during a quality assurance meeting. ADON #460 confirmed the facility does not list which type of organism…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14's skin was monitored appropriately for bruising or signs of abnormal bleeding related to anticoagulant use. This affected one resident (Resident #14) out of one resident reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, anemia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, dementia, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/17/23 revealed Resident #14 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of six, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and required limited assistance of one person physical assistance for transfers and bed mobility. Review of Resident #14's medication list revealed the resident received Eliquis (blood thinner) 5 milligrams twice a day for treatment of coronary artery disease. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14 and Resident #48 neurological checks were properly completed to assess for injury after falls. This affected two (Resident #14 and #48) of two residents reviewed for head injuries. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, anemia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, dementia, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/17/23 revealed Resident #14 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of six, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and required limited assistance of one person physical assistance for transfers and bed mobility. Review of Fall Assessment from 04/07/23 revealed Resident #14 was at minimal risk for falls. Review of Resident #14's medication list revealed she took Eliquis (blood thinner) 5 milligrams twice a day for treatment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #69 received medication timely to manage pain. This affected one resident (Resident #69) of one resident reviewed for pain. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #69 revealed an original admission date on 10/23/20, a readmission date on 02/03/21, and a discharge date on 05/26/23. Medical diagnoses included pain in left hip, Alzheimer's Disease, dislocation of left hip, fracture of left femur (thigh bone), cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had severely impaired cognition and scored a three out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #69 required extensive assistance from one staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders for April 2023 revealed Resident #69 had the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to explicitly grant the resident or resident representative the right to rescind Binding Arbitration Agreements within 30 days of signing the agreement. This affected three residents (#17, #19, and #36) of three residents reviewed for Binding Arbitration Agreements. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 05/02/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, depression, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and dementia. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 was significantly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #17's Voluntary Arbitration Agreement revealed the agreement was signed on 05/02/23 by Resident #17's legal representative. The agreement stated the agreement could be canceled by notifying the Facility in writing. Such notice must be sent via certified mail to the attention of the Administrator of the Facility, and the notice must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility failed to ensure Resident #26 and #324 met the criteria for antibiotic use before antibiotics were administered. This affected two (Resident #26 and #324) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, aphasia, diabetes, dysphagia, anemia, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/22/23 revealed Resident #26 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) staff assessment completed showing severe cognitive impairment, bladder assessment revealed Resident #26 is always incontinent of bladder, and requires total dependence of one person assist for toileting. Review of infection control log revealed Resident #26 was treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI) on 03/11/23 with one dose of Ceftriaxone injection 1 gram. Review of nursing notes from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen, dishwasher, and nectar thick fluid dispenser were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. The census was 70. Findings Include: Observation on 05/24/21 at 10:15 A.M. revealed the a large amount of a yellowish brown solid substance all over the top of the dishwasher. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #505 on 05/24/21 at 10:15 A.M. verified there was a large amount of a yellowish brown solid substance all over the top of the dishwasher. The interview further revealed the dishwasher was supposed to be cleaned every day. Observation on 05/24/21 at 10:17 A.M. revealed there was a build up of a reddish substance along the inner part of the nozzle to the nectar thickened liquids dispenser. Interview with DM #505 on 05/24/21 at 10:15 A.M. verified there was a build up of a reddish substance along the inner part of the nozzle to the nectar thickened liquids dispenser. The interview further revealed the juice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident room doors were not blocked. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of one residents reviewed for homelike environment. The census was 70. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 03/16/21 with diagnoses including dementia, psychosis, and depression. Review of the admission minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision assistance with activities of daily living. Observation on 05/24/21 at 1:08 P.M. revealed a treatment cart and a cart with coffee and plastic utensils were in front of the door to Resident #39's room. No staff were observed actively using either the treatment cart or the cart with coffee and plastic utensils. Observation on 05/25/21 at 2:03 P.M. revealed a treatment cart was in front of the door to Resident #39's room. No staff were observed actively using the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of resident hospitalizations. This affected two (Resident #41 and #69) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The census was 70. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 09/01/20 with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and depression. Review of quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had sever cognitive impairment and required supervision/limited assistance with activities of daily living. Review of a nurses note dated 04/21/21 revealed Resident #41 x-ray results were obtained and showed a fracture of the left femoral neck. Further review of the note revealed the certified nurse practitioner gave a new order for Resident #41 to be sent to the emergency room. Review of second nurses note dated 04/21/21 revealed Resident #41 was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE]. Review of the nurses note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility's Foley Catheter care policy, and review of the Hand Washing policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained while completing care. This affected one (Resident #27) of one residents observed for Foley catheter care. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/09/20. Diagnosis included Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making ability. Resident #27 required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers and extensive assistance from one staff member for ambulation, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #27 was noted to require the use of a indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-01 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to have all required postings readily accessible to all residents in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observations during the annual survey, dated 04/28/25 to 05/01/25, revealed the required postings for resident/resident representatives were located in the hallway outside of the building's interior locked doors. The location of the required postings were in a location that none of the residents had access to. Observations during the same period found that the required postings were not within the three locked hallways of the facility in which the residents were confined to. Interview with Residents #48 and #65 during resident council meeting on 05/01/25 at 10:25 A.M. confirmed they have never seen documents or postings on the walls or anywhere in their living spaces to contact the ombudsman or the state department of health. They confirmed they would like to know this information. Interview with Activities Recreation Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HANDLER, AARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
OWUSU, FRANKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 1%Other / private 77%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$276per resident / day
operating cost
$8,389per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365980. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next