No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Embassy Of Hearthside

450 Waupelani Drive, State College, PA 16801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 157 certified beds · (814) 237-0630 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$154,786 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $154,786 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
710 Edgewood Cir · (814) 231-2012 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.4 mi
510 Westerly Pkwy · (814) 238-1862 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
560 Westerly Pkwy · (814) 238-1821 · Call to confirm hours
Park
855 W Whitehall Rd · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.2%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.0%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table46.7%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.0%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.3%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.4%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.8%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.661.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.761.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.6%CMS range 25.2–45.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.3–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified58.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.4–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-20)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

78 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff that resulted in bruises to the resident's left arm, and medications administered against the resident's will, for one of five residents reviewed resulting in actual harm (Resident 1) Findings include: Observation and interview with Resident 1 on October 7, 2025, at 11:30 AM revealed she was in bed in her room. The surveyor asked Resident 1 if something happened to her arm and she immediately told the surveyor to leave the room, not to worry about it, and to shut the door. Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a nursing progress note dated October 3, 2025, at 4:20 PM that indicated Resident 1's son reported to Employee 1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), that Resident 1 had multiple bruises on her left arm. The note indicated that Employee 1 was able to observe the bruises on Resident 1's left arm but the resident would not allow her to measure them. The note indicated that there were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident to be free from neglect by not providing the services necessary to avoid physical harm related to a fracture of her right leg on one of two residents reviewed for abuse/neglect (Resident 9). This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance Findings include: Observation and interview with Resident 9 on March 12, 2025, at 10:48 AM revealed the resident was in bed. She stated she was sore on both of her knees and had an injury in her thigh area from an incident with her wheelchair. Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed a medical provider note dated January 21, 2025, at 9:49 PM that the resident was seen for an acute visit for right knee pain and the knee area was mildly swollen. An x-ray was ordered for the resident due to hitting her knee. There were no further details of any accident/injury. Review of x-ray results for Resident 9 dated January 23, 2025, revealed the resident was positive for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutrition status were maintained for four of 15 residents reviewed for nutrition concerns (Residents 49, 81, 105, and 108) and provide timely assessments and interventions from a qualified nutrition professional to promote acceptable parameters of nutrition status resulting in severe weight loss resulting in harm for one of 15 residents reviewed for nutrition concerns (Resident 81). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Nutrition Management, last reviewed on January 1, 2025, revealed the facility is to provide care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall condition. Compliance guidelines of the policy indicate a systemic approach is used to optimize each resident's nutritional status including monitoring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe and functional environment on two of two nursing units observed ([NAME] and University) and for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: During an interview with Resident 1, on July 1, 2026, at 11:12 AM he stated that the faucet in his room was broken. Concurrent observation revealed that the hot water handle had been replaced with an alternate knob that seemed to be secured on the previous hardware. The alternate knob, which wiggled and flopped up and down when attempting to turn the water on and off, also did not function normally to turn water on and off, sometimes functioning and sometimes required spinning the handle around multiple times. Observation of the [NAME] unit shower room on July 1, 2026, at 11:27 AM revealed that the shower faucet handle was installed incorrectly, with hot water indicator supplying cold water, and the cold indicator supplying hot water. Concurrent interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to employee a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: In an interview with Employee 6, certified dietary manager, on May 6, 2026, at 12:17 PM, Employee 6 indicated they were only working at the facility one day a week over the past one to two months to help out until the facility obtained a new food and nutrition services director, and that they were employed by another facility owned by the same company. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 6, 2026, at 1:19 PM indicated the facility's registered dietitian was only employed on an as needed basis and the facility did not employe a full-time registered dietitian. The facility did not employee a full-time registered dietitian or a full-time qualified director of nutrition services. Cross Refer 805, 810, and 812 483.60(a)(1) Qualified Dietary StaffPreviously cited 2/20/26 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, comfortable, orderly, and homelike environment on three of four nursing units, (Heirloom, [NAME] & University) and in an outdoor access area (breezeway) that leads to the central supply room. Findings Include:Observations of the Heirloom nursing unit main shower room on May 6, 2026, at 12:20 PM revealed that the bathroom has a strong, musty smelling odor. A dark, black substance was observed lining the white wall grout where the floor meets the wall under the shower head. The black buildup extended five feet from under the showerhead, to the corner, and three feet along the adjoining wall of the shower area, spreading into the grout of the floor tiles of the corner. Concurrent interview with Employee 3, nurse aide, revealed that the bathroom always had this odor, and the black substance had been present for a long time. Observation on May 6, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen.Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on May 6, 2026, at 12:17 PM revealed the following: A foot pedal garbage can was overflowing with trash to the point where the lid was completely held open vertically by empty food cans and trash. The flooring in the food delivery receiving area was covered in debris, dirt, and black marks. Employee 6, certified dietary manager, indicated the mess was from a delivery early in the day due to rain outside, although, much of the dirt/debris was collected up along the wall edges and dried throughout the flooring. The flooring in the dry storage area was significantly dirty upon observation with black dirt as well as debris including lids, wrappers, packs of crackers, and other debris throughout the flooring and under food storage shelving units. The flooring throughout was sticky to walk on. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to inform residents, in advance, of the care to be furnished for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed a care plan (an outline of an individual's health needs, specific care requirements, and the actions necessary to achieve desired health outcomes, represented as the focus, goal, and interventions) initiated on December 14, 2023, with a focus that they have impaired communication related to hearing loss. Resident 3 has an intervention to utilize a dry erase board for communication, initiated on December 30, 2023. During an interview with Resident 3 on May 6, 2026, at 12:45 PM, it was observed that even with a hearing aide in place, the resident had difficulty hearing the surveyor, and questions needed to be repeated slowly and loudly for the resident to understand fully. The resident stated they were very upset about what the DON (Director of Nursing) did to them. The resident stated that a few weeks ago, the DON told them that the staff would take them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet physician ordered diets for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 5 revealed an active physician's order dated November 5, 2025, to provide a pureed texture diet with nectar thick liquids. Observation of the lunch meal on May 6, 2026, at 12:40 PM revealed Resident 5's meal tray included an entree that presented as ground up meat, large pieces of sweet potatoes, and peas and diced carrots in their regular form, as well as a container of strawberry ice cream. Review of Resident 5's meal tray ticket on the tray confirmed the resident was to receive a puree texture diet with nectar thick consistency liquids. Employee 5, nurse aide, confirmed the meat was ground in texture as she observed on other resident trays with a ground consistency and not pureed, and the potatoes and peas and carrots were not pureed. Employee 5 also confirmed due to the resident being ordered nectar thick…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an assistive device for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 5).Findings Include: Review of Resident 5's care plan (an outline of an individual's health needs, specific care requirements, and the actions necessary to achieve desired health outcomes, represented as the focus, goal, and interventions), revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs - things such as eating, drinking, dressing, bathing, hygiene). A spouted sippy cup (adaptive feeding cup with a lid and spout to assist in drinking) and red foam built up handles on spoons were listed as an intervention to aid the resident in eating/drinking. Observation of Resident 5 on May 6, 2026, at 12:40 PM revealed the resident in bed with a lunch meal tray in front of her. There was no sippy cup observed for the resident's liquid which was served in a regular cup on the meal tray. Further review of Resident 5's meal ticket on the tray revealed the resident was also to receive the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian.Findings include: During an Interview with Employee 9, dietary aide, on February 17, 2026, at 9:25 AM, she revealed that the facility currently did not have a dietary supervisor or a certified dietary manager (CDM) employed. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 18, 2026, at 2:15 PM confirmed the facility did not employ a full-time registered dietitian or qualified director of food and nutrition services. Cross Refer 801 and 804 S483.60(a)(1) Qualified dietary staffPreviously cited 3/14/25 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen, and two of four nursing units (Nittany and University).Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on February 17, 2026, at 9:25 AM with Employee 9, dietary aide, revealed the following: The dishwasher room ceiling tiles above the clean dish line have yellow water damage and are buckled, broken, and hanging down revealing broken drywall beneath the ceiling tiles. A dirty vent in the same area is uncovered and dust and cobwebs are visible inside. The drain in the center of the dishwasher room has water pooling around it and white 2 half inch sized pieces of grout from the floor are in the water around the drain. The three-compartment sink has a continual drip of water from the handle of the hot water faucet. The knobs of the stove have large amounts of dust and debris collected behind and between the knobs. Both ovens are noted to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, safe, and functional environment for three of four nursing units (University, Heirloom, and Nittany; Residents 7, 49, 53, 84, 109, and 121) and the facility's laundry department. Findings include: Observation of the University nursing unit nurses' station on February 18, 2026, from 9:05 AM to 9:15 AM revealed an intermittent audible sound that resonated from a wall-mounted call bell device. Interview with Employee 6 (licensed practical nurse) on the date and time of the observation confirmed that there were no resident room call bell lights visible on the University nursing unit hallways. There was no room number indicated on the screen of the wall-mounted call bell device. Employee 6 described the ongoing intermittent noise as, a phantom call bell. Employee 6 indicated that the malfunctioning device has been an issue for approximately a year, that maintenance staff were aware through the facility's system of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 65 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bedrails for two of eight residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 11), and failed to assess all potential risks for entrapment for five of eight residents reviewed for bedrail use (Residents 4, 8, 9, 11, and 93). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Bed Rail Procedure, last reviewed without changes on January 21, 2026, revealed that if a resident is appropriate for a bed rail, nursing and/or designee will complete a Bed Rail Education/Consent with the resident and/or responsible party. Note, consent must be completed prior to bed rail(s) being placed on the resident's bed. Nursing will place a request for bed rails in TELS (maintenance communication system). Maintenance will confirm that consent/education was completed before placing bed rails to the bed, will install bed rails as requested, will ensure that manufacturer's recommendations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent (Residents 17 and 100).Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was eight percent based on 25 medication opportunities with two medication errors. Observation of a medication administration pass on February 18, 2026, at 12:36 PM revealed Employee 4 (licensed practical nurse) administer Carafate (anti-ulcer medication, adheres to the stomach lining to protect it from acids and enzymes) 1 gm (gram) to Resident 17. The packaging of the Carafate medication included instructions to administer the medication on an empty stomach. Resident 17 had her lunch tray in front of her on her overbed table and was beginning to eat her lunch at the time of the medication administration. Employee 4 stated, normally trays are not this early, as she administered the medication to Resident 17, to which Resident 17 responded, I didn't eat a lot. Interview with Employee 4 on February 18, 2026, at 12:54 PM verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide menu items as indicated for the dining room and two of four nursing units (Heirloom and Nittany, Residents 51 and 89).Findings include: In an interview with Resident 51 on February 17, 2026, at 1:05 PM they stated that they often do not receive what they are supposed to on their meal tray. Review of the menu for lunch on February 19, 2026, included maple glazed ham, macaroni and cheese, Prince [NAME] vegetable blend, wheat dinner roll, and rainbow sherbet. During an observation of the tray line service on February 19, 2026, at 11:40 AM the plating of the meals for the dining room and Heirloom unit were observed. No wheat dinner rolls or bread was plated with the meal. Observation on February 19, 2026, at 12:18 PM on the Nittany unit of Resident 89's tray revealed that no bread was present. Observation of lunch meal service on the Heirloom unit on February 19, 2026, from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food at palatable temperatures on three of four nursing units (Heirloom, University, and Nittany; Residents 3, 13, 17, 89, and 93). Findings: Review of the mealtime documentation provided by the facility revealed the Heirloom food carts are scheduled to arrive on the nursing unit at 12:00 PM. Observation of the Heirloom nursing unit meal cart revealed it was observed outside the kitchen on February 19, 2026, at 11:55 AM. Observation of the lunch meal service on February 19, 2026, on the Heirloom nursing unit revealed that food trays arrived on the meal cart at 12:29 PM. Staff immediately began passing the food trays until the last tray was passed at 12:42 PM. The surveyor began testing the food temperatures of Resident 3's tray at this time with the following results: Puree ham was cold at 90.4 degrees FahrenheitPuree mixed vegetables were cold at 92.2 degrees FahrenheitPuree mac and cheese was cold at 91.4 degrees FahrenheitContainer of sherbert was melted Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's arbitration agreements and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's arbitration agreements failed to ensure the selection of a neutral arbitrator for two of three residents reviewed with a signed arbitration agreement (Residents 93 and 118); and failed to include required regulatory language for one of three residents reviewed with a signed arbitration agreement (Resident 49).Findings include: Review of an Arbitration Agreement (an agreement that the resident/resident's responsible party and the facility will resolve legal disputes through binding arbitration, waiving their right to a trial) signed by Resident 93 on December 13, 2023, revealed that the document stipulated that, The arbitration shall be conducted by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). If the NAF process is no longer in existence at the time of dispute, or NAF is unwilling or unable to conduct the arbitration, a mutually acceptable neutral third-party alternative will be agreed to by the parties. The agreement afforded the facility the initial selection of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that written notice, including the reason for a room change, was provided to a resident prior to a facility-initiated room change for one of one resident reviewed for concerns related to resident choice (Resident 11).Findings include: Interview with Resident 11 on February 18, 2026, at 11:15 AM revealed that she, .got room moved and do not know why, staff just came in and started taking stuff out of closets and drawers and was moved that day. Resident 11 further stated, I'm not cattle, they could have talked to me about it. I speak English and understand what they say. Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed census information that she did reside in the same room from November 18, 2024, to February 8, 2026, when she moved to her current room. Nursing documentation by the registered nurse dated February 8, 2026, at 12:17 PM noted, We spoke with resident about moving rooms and she agreed she is okay with moving rooms, I also called and left a message for her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain written authorization to manage personal funds for one of two residents reviewed for personal funds concerns (Resident 12).Findings include: Interview with Resident 12 on February 18, 2026, at 9:23 AM revealed that the business office in the facility held money for him, that a cousin deposited a check in that account for him, but that he did not receive a statement or had knowledge of how much money was in the account. Clinical record review for Resident 12 revealed a Resident Personal Funds agreement dated November 7, 2022, that Resident 12 signed to elect to manage his own funds (declined to have the facility manage his funds). A Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds form signed by Resident 12 on November 8, 2022, declined an RFMS account. A Resident Personal Funds agreement dated November 5, 2024, signed by Resident 12, again documented his election to manage his own funds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish clear end of life directives for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 13).Findings include: A review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed an active physician's order dated [DATE], that indicated the resident was a DNR (do not resuscitate, do not attempt CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) when the person has no pulse and is not breathing) and stated, DNR (Do Not Resuscitate)-LIMITED: NO INTUBATION, use medical treatment, IVF, ABX Discussed with daughter, new POLST completed. Resident 13's POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, a form directing medical staff to complete life-sustaining treatment or allow a natural death) dated on [DATE], was noted to be signed by the resident's daughter due to confusion at that time. Clinical record review for Resident 13 revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at periodic intervals of time to assess resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report to the appropriate agencies a potential allegation of misappropriation of resident property for one of 24 records reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, last reviewed without changes on January 21, 2026, revealed an immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. The facility will report all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and all other required agencies (i.e. law enforcement, when applicable) within specified timeframes, not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse, and do not result in serious bodily injury. Nursing documentation dated January 23, 2026, at 2:25 PM revealed Resident 30 put her husband on the phone with Employee 5 (licensed practical nurse).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for suicidal ideations one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 101).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 101 on September 22, 2025. Nursing documentation dated January 30, 2026, at 2:55 PM noted Resident 101 was very tearful, stating she was scared and wanted to go home. Documentation revealed Resident 101 stated she wanted a straight razor because if she does not do it to herself, this place will, stating she would be better off dead. Documentation revealed the facility contacted Resident 101's daughter and she was unable to calm Resident 101. The facility placed Resident 101 on every 15-minute checks. Review of Resident 101's care plan on February 20, 2026, revealed no comprehensive, person-centered care plan that addressed Resident 101's suicidal ideation. Interview with Employee 3 (social worker) on February 20, 2026, at 1:11 PM confirmed the above findings for Resident 101 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist dependent residents with activities of daily living for two of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living concerns (Residents 11 and 8). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that staff determined Resident 11 needed partial/moderate staff assistance for showering/bathing. Review of a plan of care initiated by the facility on November 20, 2024, to address Resident 11's care preferences, revealed interventions that included that staff honor that Resident 11 stated that she preferred a shower in the morning. Resident 11 is scheduled for a shower on day shift. Review of a plan of care initiated by the facility on November 19, 2024, to address assistance Resident 11 needed for activities of daily living (ADLs), revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion (ROM) for two of six residents reviewed for ROM concerns (Residents 59 and 118). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 59 on August 8, 2025. Review of Resident 59's most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated January 20, 2026, noted staff assessed Resident 59 as having impairment to his range of motion (ROM, movement of the body to maintain a resident's ability) of one side of his upper extremities. Review of Resident 59's discharge progress note from occupational therapy dated September 30, 2025, indicated discharge recommendations for a restorative nursing program. There was no evidence in Resident 59's clinical record that Resident 59 received a passive range of motion program. Review of Resident 59's therapy discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine as recommended by a physician for one of one resident reviewed for oxygen concerns (Resident 93). Findings include: Interview with Resident 93 on February 17, 2026, at 3:13 PM revealed that her cardiologist was upset that she still does not have a CPAP machine (a device used to treat sleep apnea by delivering a steady gentle stream of pressurized air through a mask to keep the airway open during sleep). She indicated that her cardiologist had asked for her to have a CPAP machine three times now. She also indicated that the staff have never discussed the CPAP machine with her. Review of a cardiology consult visit form dated September 26, 2024, indicated that the cardiologist wanted the facility to get Resident 93's CPAP as she was on it at home. Further clinical record review for Resident 93 revealed cardiologist visit note dated March 18, 2025, that indicated he strongly recommends Resident 93…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to secure medications on one of four nursing units (Nittany, Residents 13 and 51).Findings include: Observation of Resident 51's room on February 17, 2026, at 1:05 PM revealed an eye dropper container of Refresh Tears (artificial tears designed to provide temporary relief from dry eyes, irritation, and discomfort caused by insufficient tear production) on their bedside table. During a concurrent interview with Resident 51, they stated that the facility was aware they had the eye drops in their room. Observation of Resident 13's room February 17, 2026, at 1:15 PM revealed an eye dropper container of Genteal Tears (eye drops used to relieve dry, irritated eyes) on their bedside table. There was no evidence Resident 51 or Resident 13 was evaluated or ordered to self-administer the eye drops as indicated above and the eye drops were stored in the resident's room. The Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing were made aware of the above findings on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services for two of four residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 2 and 30). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 30 on March 18, 2025. Observation of Resident 30 on February 17, 2026, at 11:08 AM revealed Resident 30 was in the dining room. Observation of Resident 30's mouth revealed several broken teeth. Review of Resident 30's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed by the facility, at intervals to determine the care needs of the resident) dated March 24, 2025, revealed that she had some of her own natural teeth and that she had obvious or was likely to have cavities or broken teeth Review of Resident 30's care plan-initiated April 6, 2025, revealed Resident 30 is at risk for dental or chewing problems related to missing and broken teeth. Further review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed Resident 30 was not seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink to accommodate individualized preferences for one of 24 sampled residents. (Resident 89).Findings include: Interview with Resident 89 on February 17, 2026, at 2:05 PM revealed that despite explaining to the facility that she is vegetarian, eating only occasionally some chicken or turkey, she is continually served meat. Resident 89 stated she was served ham for breakfast this morning and received the meat at lunch (menu reveals that the meat was Salisbury steak). Resident 89 also stated that she only receives water to drink and she does not receive ice. Evidence the facility obtained food preferences/choices for Resident 89 was requested from facility staff on February 18, 2026, at 2:30 PM but was not provided during the survey. Interview with Resident 89 on February 19, 2026, at 9:36 AM revealed that she received bacon for breakfast that morning and only received water as her beverage without ice. Review of Resident 89's dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-04 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services in the main kitchen for one of four units (University, Residents 1, 2 and 3).Findings include: Interview with Resident 3 on February 2, 2026, at 11:05 AM, revealed that the resident sometimes receives food served on Styrofoam for all three meals in a day. The resident stated they did not like Styrofoam because the food gets cold quickly. Interview with Resident 2 on February 2, 2026, at 11:15 AM, revealed that meals are served on Styrofoam often and it has happened recently, even in the last week. The resident stated, when it is a hot meal, it can be less hot, and this continues to happen about once a week. In an interview with Resident 1 on February 2, 2026, at 11:25 AM, the resident stated eating off Styrofoam makes her feel sick, and she does not like Styrofoam. Interview with Employee 1, dietary manager, on February 2, 2026, at 10:15 AM revealed that there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the individual needs and interests for four of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4).Findings include: In an interview with Resident 3 on February 2, 2026, at 11:05 AM, the resident stated activities are often cancelled because there are only two activity staff and there are often days with no activities at all. In an interview with Resident 2 on February 2, 2026, at 11:15 AM, the resident stated the activities used to be better than they are now, and there are not always activities to attend. Resident 2 also stated there are no alternative activities if they do not like an activity scheduled, and they are very concerned that the facility is cutting the activities. In an interview with Resident 1 on February 2, 2026, at 11:25 AM, the resident stated activities have been cancelled and now there are days without any activities at all, which bothers them. In an interview with Resident 4 on February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on August 25, 2025, at 11:30 AM with Employee 1 (dietary manager) revealed the following: In the dry storage area, there was a bag of elbow macaroni, and a bag of opened egg noodles, with no open or use by dates. On the bread racks, there were six packs of English muffins, three loaves of bread, two packs of sandwich rolls, and one pack of hotdog rolls with no received or use by dates. In the walk-in Freezer, there was a box of mixed vegetables with no open or use by dates. The vegetables were not covered or sealed. In the walk-in refrigerator, there were boxes of mushrooms, lemons, and oranges with no open or use by dates. The items were not covered or sealed. In the reach-in cooler, there was an opened container of grape jelly and strawberry juice with no open or use by dates. In the production area, there was an opened box of thick and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding elopements for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4) and medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: The current facility policy entitled Elopements and Wandering Residents, revealed the facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk of elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. The facility will establish and utilize a systematic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement or unsafe wandering, including identification and assessment of risk, evaluation and analysis of hazards and risks, implementing interventions to reduce hazards and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report to the appropriate agencies an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse for one of five records reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The current facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revealed an immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Investigation of alleged abuse includes identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, or others who might have knowledge of the allegations. The facility will have written procedures that include reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies (law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes. Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on March 12, 2025, at 1:45 PM the Administrator stated the facility was utilizing a registered dietitian on a part time basis who was primarily working remotely with some onsite visits, and the facility did employee a full-time dietary manager (Employee 1). The Administrator was not sure of Employee 1's qualifications. In a follow up interview on March 13, 2025, at 10:00 AM, the Administrator confirmed Employee 1 was not a certified dietary manager, certified food service manager, did not have a national certification for food service management and safety, and did not hold a degree in food service management. The Administrator also indicated the registered dietitian onsite visits to the facility occurred over the night shift hours when no food service operations were taking place, and residents were likely sleeping. The facility did not employe a full-time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen, and one of four nursing units ([NAME]). Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on March 11, 2025, at 10:26 AM with Employee 1, dietary manager revealed the following: A large hole in the left lower wall inside the entrance doors to the kitchen. Dried food splatter and staining were observed on the ceiling tiles and light covers in the dish room area. The top of the dishwasher was covered in debris and dust. The tile flooring in the dish room contained multiple cracks and broken tiles. Water and food particles were observed pooling in the areas where the tiles were broken off. Two stacks of dish washing racks were observed on carts in the center of the dish machine room. The gray colored plastic wash racks were worn, with multiple broken plastic pieces at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, safe, and orderly environment on three of four nursing units ([NAME], Nittany, University and Residents 8, 15, 43, 54, 64, 81, 82, 91, 100). Findings include: Observation of Resident 64's room on March 11, 2025, at 12:59 PM revealed an electrical outlet box lying on the floor connected to wires, which extended into a long piece of conduit that was hanging off the wall behind the resident's bed. An unpainted area with empty screw holes was observed on the wall above where the outlet box was laying. Some dry wall debris and wire clippings were observed along the wall. An oxygen concentrator was plugged into the outlet box on the floor. A follow up observation of Resident 64's room on March 12, 2025, at 10:07 AM also revealed significant brown/black buildup along the baseboard heater under the window of the room where the floor meets the wall. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents with enteral tube feeding, catheter care, medication administration, and dressing changes for four of four employees reviewed for competencies (Employees 11, 12, 13, and 14). Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 118 residents receiving medications, eight residents with indwelling catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine), seven residents with pressure ulcers, and three residents with enteral tube feedings (device that allows liquid food to enter your stomach or intestine through a tube). A request for nursing staff competencies for enteral tube feeding, catheter care, medication administration, and dressing changes revealed the facility was unable to provide any competencies for Employees 11 and 12 (registered nurse), and Employees 13 and 14 (licensed practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain pharmacy recommendations or evidence pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician for five of five residents reviewed (Residents 8, 16, 101, 108). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed pharmacy notes dated July 22, August 22, September 11, December 15, 2024, and January 16, 2025, which indicated a pharmacy review was completed for the resident and pharmacy recommendations were made to the physician. There was no evidence of the pharmacist report of recommendations or a physician's response to the pharmacy recommendations for the dates indicated. Clinical record review for Resident 101 revealed pharmacy notes dated August 20, 2024, and January 17, 2025, which indicated a pharmacy review was completed and pharmacy recommendations were made. There was no evidence of the pharmacist report of recommendations or a physician's response to the pharmacy recommendations for the dates indicated. Clinical record review for Resident 108 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier precautions for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 40, 72, and 325) and ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection with the storage of resident equipment and supplies for one of four nursing units ([NAME]; Residents 8, 54, 64, and 81), and the facility laundry area. Findings include: An observation of Resident 81's bathroom, which is shared with an adjoining room with Resident 64 on March 11, 2025, at 1:20 PM revealed a raised toilet seat sitting beside the toilet directly on the floor. An observation of Resident 8's bathroom on March 12, 2025, at 10:19 AM revealed a raised toilet seat sitting directly on the floor beside the toilet in the bathroom. An observation of the [NAME] unit nourishment room, located behind the nursing station on March 13, 2025, at 1:09 PM revealed a rusted white metal cabinet in the room labeled personal hygiene. The cabinet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility determined a resident's ability to self-administer medications for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 72). Findings include: Observation of Resident 72 on March 11, 2025, at 12:25 PM revealed the resident was in bed. An adjacent bedside table had Fluticasone nasal spray (a steroid medication used to treat various signs and symptoms that could be caused by allergies). A concurrent interview revealed the resident utilized the medication to treat allergies. A current physician's order dated February 22, 2025, for Resident 72 revealed an order for Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50 micrograms per actuation (mcg/act)c, use two sprays in both nostrils one time daily related to allergic rhinitis (an allergic reaction to allergens in the air that may cause nasal congestion, sneezing, and watery eyes). Further clinical record review for Resident 72 revealed no physician's order that the resident may self-administer the medication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish clear advance directives for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 323). Findings include: A review of the census for Resident 323 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current physician orders for Resident 323 revealed no orders related to the code status (instructions for health care personnel if the resident's heart stopped beating or the resident stopped breathing; does the resident want cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for the resident. Review of the current care plan for Resident 323 revealed no care plan related to code status. Review of the POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, a form directing medical staff to complete life-sustaining treatment or allow a natural death) documentation for Resident 323 on March 12, 2025, at 2:18 PM revealed a form located in the POLST binder on the Nittany Nursing Unit for Resident 323 that was signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve the ability to perform activities of daily living for one of three residents reviewed for eating concerns (Resident 105). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 105 revealed an MDS (Minimum Data Set, assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that staff assessed Resident 105 as requiring the supervision with set up help only for eating. Resident 105's next MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed staff assessed Resident 105 as now requiring extensive assistance of one staff for eating. There was no documented evidence in Resident 105's clinical record to indicate that the facility identified or assessed Resident 105's decline in her ability to perform this activity of daily living. Speech Therapy did not assess Resident 105 until January 19, 2025. Further review of Resident 105's clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician orders for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 104 and 115). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 115 on March 12, 2025, at 9:44 AM the resident indicated she was recently admitted to the facility about a month prior and had a feeding tube in place when she arrived but was no longer receiving feedings through the tube because she was eating. Resident 115 then indicated the tube had not been flushed since the feedings through the tube had stopped. Resident 115 stated she asked a nurse about the tube not being flushed and was told everything had been discontinued. Resident 15 stated she was concerned because the tube had an odor. No odor was observed near Resident 115, although the resident lifted her shirt to expose a feeding tube coming from her abdomen area and the tubing had particles and a red substance observed inside the exposed area of the tubing. Clinical record review for Resident 115 revealed the resident did have a G-tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a resident to receive proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: An observation of Resident 81's left foot during a pressure ulcer dressing change to the same foot, on March 14, 2025, at 10:26 AM revealed the resident's toenails on the left foot were yellow and extremely thick, one-half inch in depth raised up on top of the center surface of the toenails. A closer look revealed the toenails had extended from each toe and curled upward and had attached to the top flat surface portion of the nail with a fungal looking appearance. The skin on the toes was scaled and peeling. Upon concurrent interview with the resident regarding his toenails, the resident stated he has asked three times to see a podiatrist since he has been there and hasn't seen one yet. In an interview with the Director of Nursing on March 14, 2025, at 10:35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion for two of three residents reviewed for ROM concerns (Residents 101 and 25). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 101 on November 9, 2023. Review of Resident 101's most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated February 7, 2025, noted staff assessed Resident 101 as having impairment to his range of motion (ROM, movement of the body to maintain a resident's ability) of his bilateral lower extremities. Nursing documentation dated January 24, 2025, at 3:07 PM revealed Resident 101's daughter was made aware of his fall and that therapy was being discontinued. Review of Resident 101's physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], noted he exhausted his benefits. Therapy documentation revealed Resident 101 was provided education for proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the availability of necessary emergency supplies for one of one resident reviewed receiving hemodialysis (Resident 15). Findings include: In an interview and observation of Resident 15 on March 11, 2025, at 1:39 PM revealed she was lying in bed eating lunch. The resident indicated she attended dialysis outside the facility three days a week. Resident 15 pointed to her dialysis access site on her left chest area and indicated she used to have it on the right side, but they had to change it. Concurrent observation of Resident 15's room did not reveal any emergency supplies in the resident 's room for the central line to include sterile gauze, hemostat (a tool used to control bleeding), needleless connector, or tape. With the resident's permission to look in her bed side drawers, closet, and wheelchair bag, there was also no evidence of any emergency supplies in those areas belonging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of two residents reviewed (Resident 25). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 25 revealed the facility admitted her on March 8, 2019, with diagnosis including Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 25's significant change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated May 28, 2024, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 25 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 25's care plan entitled Cognitive Status: has an impaired cognitive function r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) vascular Dementia revealed that there was no indication that the facility had implemented an individualized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medically related social services were provided to one of one resident reviewed (Resident 100). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed a nursing progress note date [DATE], at 4:19 PM that indicated Resident 100's family was in and notified her that her husband had passed away. The progress note indicated that Resident 100 cried for a while with family present and was doing well while they were visiting. Further clinical record review for Resident 100 revealed a progress note dated [DATE], at 1:58 PM that indicated she was mildly depressed today due to the passing of her spouse and family was in to visit. A social service progress note dated [DATE], at 11:16 AM revealed that the social service worker met with Resident 100 regarding her depression after her husband passed away. The note indicated that Resident 100 stated that she is doing okay and is still feeling sad. She also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received 12 hours of in-service training annually for two of two nurse aides reviewed (Employees 16 and 17). Findings include: During a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on March 13, 2025, at 1:45 PM the surveyor asked for training records to indicate that nurse aides had received at least 12 hours of in-service training in the last year for Employees 16 and 17 (nurse aides). Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 14, 2025, at 10:41 AM confirmed there was no documented evidence that Employee 16 received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training in the last year. Review of Employee 17's Employee Annual Education Tracking Sheet, revealed that the Director of Nursing documented Employee 17 completed 27.5 hours of training on February 11, 2025. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 14, 2025, at 10:40 AM revealed the facility gave Employee 17 a packet of information to review and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate clinical documentation for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 1 on June 12, 2024. Nursing documentation dated on November 12, 2024, at 12:27 PM revealed the licensed practical nurse noted after Resident 1 began eating his meal tray, he began to have a mild coughing episode and indicated he was not feeling well. The licensed practical nurse documented the registered nurse was aware. Nursing documentation dated November 12, 2024, at 1:13 PM indicated that the licensed practical nurse documented Resident 1's oxygen saturation was at 75% on room air and the registered nurse was aware. Nursing documentation dated November 12, 2024, at 4:35 PM indicated the licensed practical nurse noted while Resident 1 was eating dinner he began coughing and spitting up large amounts of mucus with particles of food. The licensed practical nurse noted the registered nurse was aware. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0772 — pattern
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory work as ordered by the physician for five of seven residents reviewed (Residents 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7). Findings include: Review of the facility's contracted laboratory order sheet revealed that a Dermatology panel included skin testing for Sarcoptes scabiei (the mite that causes scabies). Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed that on October 27, 2024, at 9:53 PM staff indicated that they had a continuing itchy rash with raised areas. On October 29, 2024, there was a physician's order for staff to obtain a Dermatology panel. Review of Resident 1's Dermatology panel results dated October 30, 2024, revealed that the facility's contracted laboratory did not test for Sarcoptes scabiei or report the results of the Sarcoptes scabiei test to the facility. Clinical record review for Resident 3, 4, 6, and 7 revealed that on October 29, 2024, there was a physician's order for staff to obtain a Dermatology panel. Review of Resident 3, 4, 6, and 7's Dermatology panel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate clinical documentation for five of five residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Findings include: Clinical record review for Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 revealed that staff failed to consistently document (leaving several blank areas or areas that indicated not applicable) on their ADL Task Documentation form (Activities of Daily Living, a document staff use to indicate the Resident's self-performance and staff support needed while completing a task and/or receiving care) that indicated staff provided ADL care, such as bed mobility, transfers, skin care, eating assistance, continence status and care, and resident behaviors, on the following dates: Resident 1 August 1, 3, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 31, 2024 September 2, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13 and 17, 2024 Resident 2 August 6 and 9, 2024 September 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12 and 17, 2024 Resident 3 August 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, and 31, 2024 September 2, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13 and 17, 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, employee personnel record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain attestation of Pennsylvania residency or criminal background checks as required for four of five personnel records reviewed (Employees 3, 4, 5, and 6); and failed to ensure the completion of abuse training for one of five newly hired employees reviewed (Employee 5). Findings include: In accordance with Act 13 Elder Abuse Mandatory Reporting and Act 169 Criminal Background Checks, nursing facilities are required to obtain a criminal background check on all newly hired employees. Facilities are required to obtain the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) background check within 30 days of hire on all prospective employees. If the applicant has not been a Pennsylvania resident for the two years before application, they will need to have a PSP criminal history background check completed and an FBI Background Check. The applicant will obtain an FBI fingerprint card either from their prospective employer or by contacting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate recommended services for a resident's range of motion for four of nine residents reviewed (Residents 6, 11, 14, and 51). Findings included: Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated March 6, 2024, that indicated the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 that indicated a severe cognitive impairment level. The current care plan for Resident 1 revealed the resident requires assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care related to dementia, weakness, and impaired balance. The care plan indicated the resident was dependent on staff for transfers and required extensive assistance of two from staff for bed mobility. A review of the most current physical therapy discharge summary for Resident 11 dated March 6, 2024, at 11:42 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care, and to eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for two of four residents reviewed for mood/behavior (Residents 14 and 28). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 14 revealed a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) since admission on [DATE]. Resident 14 was unable to be interviewed related to his diagnosis of PTSD due to his current cognitive status. A review of Resident 14's admission minimum data set (MDS, an assessment completed by the facility at intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], indicated a diagnosis of PTSD for Resident 14. A review of Resident 14's most recent quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated PTSD continued to be an active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner, maintain equipment in a sanitary condition, and prepare food items in accordance with professional standards in the main kitchen. Findings include: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 19, Dietary Manager, on April 23, 2024, between 9:18 AM and 10:30 AM revealed the following: A white dry erase board was falling off the wall. There was a six pack of hoagie rolls located in a walk-in cooler with no date or label on them. There was a roll of thawed beef with a prepared date of 4/17 and an expired use by date of 4/20 on it. There was a significant amount of dust and debris on a window air conditioning unit in the dry goods storage area. There was a build-up of a black substance on the corners of the air vents and a significant build-up of the same substance on the interior vents. There was a significant number of cobwebs located on the ceiling border with the wall located in the dry goods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier transmission-based precautions for five of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 33, 40, 68, and 69). Findings include: Review of the memo entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, gown and glove use) in Nursing Homes to Prevent the Spread of Multi-drug Resistant Organisms released by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) on March 20, 2024, with an implementation date of April 1, 2024, revealed that nursing care facilities are to use EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices (i.e., indwelling urinary catheters) during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. High-contact activity would include things like dressing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, wound care, or device care. Clinical record review for Resident 33 revealed current physician orders that included the following: change the 16 French…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident and/or responsible party participation in comprehensive care plans for two of two residents reviewed for care planning concerns (Residents 8 and 69). Findings include: Interview with Resident 8 on April 23, 2024, at 3:32 PM revealed that she denied any invitation to participate in her care plan meetings. Resident 8 stated, I haven't had no meetings like that at all. Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed an undated printed invitation, addressed to Resident 8, that indicated there would be a meeting to discuss a care plan. The letter instructed that she should RSVP to the social service office as soon as possible or the facility would continue with the care conference, .as scheduled above; however, there was no date or time included on this page of the invitation. There was no email, phone number, or facility staff member name provided on the invitation to inform Resident 8 who or how to contact someone regarding the letter. A Care Plan Meeting Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding a fluid restriction for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 62), and physician ordered treatments for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Fluid restriction or Encouragement last reviewed without changes on March 29, 2024, revealed that residents are encouraged and assisted as needed to consume the amount of fluids appropriate for their diagnoses and medical status. Fluid restrictions will have a dietician or physician's order specifying the total amount of fluid per day. The total amount may be broken down into recommendations for the fluids at meals, between meals, and with medication passes. Fluids consumed should be recorded as accurately as possible. Appropriate documentation should be completed regarding the resident's compliance or refusal regarding fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain necessary audiology services for one of one resident reviewed for hearing concerns (Resident 8). Findings include: Interview with Resident 8 on April 23, 2024, at 3:12 PM revealed she was extremely hard of hearing and that she required the use of a dry erase board to communicate every question to her during the interview. Resident 8 stated that, .they've been promising me that a hearing doctor would come in and clean my ears and give me hearing aids, but no one has come, haven't seen anyone. Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that assessed Resident 8 as having highly impaired hearing (with the use of a hearing aid if used); but that no hearing aid was used. The care assessment area (CAA, section of the assessment that documents the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer for one of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer concerns (Resident 40). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 40 on [DATE]. Review of Resident 40's admission assessment noted nursing staff assessed Resident 40 with an unstageable pressure sore on his coccyx measuring 1.5 centimeters (cm) by 0.5 cm with an unknown depth. Review of Resident 40's care plan initiated on [DATE], revealed the facility implemented a wound treatment, and instructed nursing to observe the wound dressing daily to ensure that the dressing remains intact and there are no signs and symptoms of infection or increased drainage. Review of Resident 40's Treatment Administration Record (TAR, a form the facility utilizes to document treatments) dated [DATE] revealed the facility did not initiate a treatment to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to deter resident falls and prevent potential injury for two of 12 residents reviewed for fall concerns (Residents 20 and 48). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 20 revealed a plan of care developed by the facility to address her risk for falls. Interventions listed in the plan of care included bilateral fall mats at all times when she is in bed since October 17, 2023. Observation of Resident 20 on April 23, 2024, at 3:00 PM revealed she was in bed. There was a fall mat on the left side of her bed. There was no fall mat on the right side of her bed. Observation of Resident 20 on April 26, 2024, at 10:51 AM revealed she was in bed with a fall mat on only the left side of her bed. Interview with Employee 2 (licensed practical nurse) on April 26, 2024, at 10:56 AM at Resident 20's bedside, confirmed that there was only one fall mat in her room. The right side of her bed was not equipped with a fall mat. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer supplemental oxygen as prescribed by the physician for two of five residents reviewed for oxygen concerns (Residents 8 and 62). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed an active physician's order dated December 14, 2023, that instructed staff to administer supplemental oxygen via a nasal cannula (NC, flexible tubing with small prongs at one end inserted into the nostrils for the application of supplemental oxygen) at 3 liters per minute (l/m) continuously. Observation of Resident 8 on April 23, 2024, at 3:52 PM revealed the application of supplemental oxygen via a NC and a room concentrator (medical device used to concentrate the oxygen available in room air to administer oxygen-enriched supply back to the resident). The administration setting on the room concentrator was 2.5 l/m. Observation of Resident 8 on April 26, 2024, at 11:13 AM again revealed the application of supplemental oxygen via a NC and room concentrator at a rate of 2.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess the entrapment risk of assist bar use for two of six residents reviewed for accident concerns (Residents 8 and 20) Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, last reviewed without changes on March 29, 2024, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. Entrapment, is an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail. Resident assessment must also assess the resident's risk from using bed rails. Examples of the potential risks with the use of bed rails include accident hazards (e.g., falls, entrapment, and other injuries sustained from attempts to climb over, around, between, or through the rails, or over the footboard). The resident assessment should assess the resident's risk of entrapment between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and family, resident, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange for behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of four residents reviewed for behavioral concerns (Resident 78; University nursing unit, Resident 69). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment (document developed by the facility to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently) revealed that the facility identified the number of specialty unit beds specifically for those with dementia and the diseases/conditions and physical/cognitive disabilities cared for included psychiatric/mood disorders. Resident acuity affecting licensed nurses included behavioral health, dementia, mood disorders (like bipolar disorder) and schizophrenia. Specific Care or Practices for the Mental Health and Behavior category included a current contract with a new service. Clinical record review for Resident 78 revealed a diagnoses list that included Wernicke's encephalopathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of two residents reviewed (Residents 56). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 56 revealed that the facility admitted him on June 20, 2023, with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) with other behavioral disturbances. A review of Resident 56's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated June 28, 2023, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 56 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 56's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the resident's dementia and cognitive loss. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist reported irregularities to the attending physician and that the physician appropriately responded to reported irregularities for two of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Residents 20 and 52). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 20 revealed a consultant pharmacist recommendation to the physician on July 28, 2023, to evaluate Resident 20's use of the Oxcarbazepine medication (anti-seizure medication used to treat Resident 20's dementia with psychotic disturbance, condition where individuals with cognitive decline experience symptoms such as hallucinations and delusional thinking) from 150 mg twice daily. The certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) responded to the recommendation on August 25, 2023, that the recommendation was declined because the reduction would likely exacerbate Resident 20's underlying psychiatric disorder. Resident 20's active physician order for the Oxcarbazepine medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of six residents reviewed for medication regime review (Residents 56 and 20). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 56 on June 20, 2023. Resident 56's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated June 26, 2023, noting the facility added Trazodone (an antidepressant-sedative medication) 100 milligrams (mg), one tablet on June 26, 2023, for insomnia. There was no diagnosis of insomnia at this time. Review of the consultant pharmacist recommendation dated September 25, 2023, revealed hypnotic/sedative medications should be reviewed for gradual dose reductions (GDR) to determine if symptoms can be controlled at a lower dose, or without the medication. The consultant pharmacist recommended a gradual dose reduction. Resident 56's physician indicated he is stable on his current regimen and his mood instability is too great. Review of the consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (Residents 56 and 61). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 7.89 percent based on 38 medication opportunities with three medication errors. The policy entitled Medication Administration, last reviewed on March 29, 2024, indicates that medications will be administered by legally authorized and trained persons in accordance with applicable State, Local, and Federal laws and consistent with accepted standards of practice. The nurse is responsible to read the label comparing it to the medication administration record before preparing the medication. Observation of a medication administration pass on April 23, 2024, at 9:35 AM revealed Employee 15 (licensed practical nurse, LPN), prepared and administered Resident 56's medications. Employee 15 administered Resident 56's medications with water. Review of Resident 56's pharmacy medication label revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure medications on one of three nursing units ([NAME] unit, Resident 23). Findings include: Observation of Resident 23's room on the [NAME] Hall on April 24, 2024, at 11:55 AM revealed her in her bed with her overbed table beside the bed on her left-hand side. Noted on the overbed table was a small medicine cup with four pills in it. Resident 23 reached over to her bedside stand to get the remote to turn down her television and she knocked over the medication cup spilling the four pills to the floor. She indicated to the surveyor that they were her morning pills that she did not finish taking because she forgot. The surveyor immediately alerted Resident 23's medication nurse about the event. Concurrent interview with Employee 16, Licensed Practical Nurse, revealed that he thought Resident 23 took the medications and was unaware they were still in a cup on her bedside table. The medications that were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide dental care services for two of five residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 8 and 20). Findings include: Interview with Resident 8 on April 23, 2024, at 3:12 PM revealed that she had not received dental services since being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 8 stated, My teeth are breaking and falling out. Observation of Resident 8 on the date and time of the interview revealed that she had missing, likely broken, and discolored natural teeth. Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that assessed Resident 8 as having obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth with mouth or facial pain, discomfort, or difficulty with chewing. The dental care area triggered for staff to develop a plan of care to address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's arbitration agreement and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's arbitration agreement failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident or his or her representative, have the opportunity for the selection of a venue convenient to both parties, and the selection of a neutral arbitrator, for one of one resident reviewed with a signed arbitration agreement (Resident 8). Findings include: Review of an Arbitration Agreement (an agreement that the resident and the facility will resolve legal disputes through binding arbitration, waiving their right to a trial) signed by Resident 8 on December 13, 2023, revealed that the arbitration agreement failed to allow for a choice of venue convenient to both parties. Further review of the facility's arbitration agreement revealed that the facility failed to provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator (an impartial, or unbiased third-party decision maker, contracted with, and agreed to by both parties to resolve their dispute) as one is designated in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on select facility policy and procedures, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative received written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer for two of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 3 and CR1 ). Findings include: The current facility policy entitled, Transfer/Bed Hold/Return Policy, revealed that the facility provides the resident and responsible representative with notice of its bed hold policy upon admission and at the time of transfer or therapeutic leave from the facility to ensure continuity of care. Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed that he was transferred to the hospital on January 18, 2024, for behavioral issues. A progress note dated January 18, 2024, at 3:08 PM revealed that the facility bed-hold agreement was printed and sent with the resident to the hospital per policy. Review of Resident 3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was transferred from the facility with the expectation of returning was permitted to return, had met the specific requirements for a facility-initiated discharge, and/or provided evidence that the facility was not able to meet the resident's needs for one of four residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings included: The current facility policy entitled Transfer/Bed-Hold/Return Policy, revealed that the resident may resume residence in the facility following therapeutic leave or hospitalization if the resident required services provided by the facility and the resident was eligible for Medicaid nursing facility services or agrees to pay privately for these services. Closed clinical record review revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of a tracheostomy (surgically placed throat breathing tube), enteral tube feed (surgically placed stomach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report allegations of potential staff to resident abuse for four of nine residents reviewed for abuse (Residents 3, 4, 12, and 13). Findings include: Interview with Employee 4, Director of Memory Care unit and Activities, on November 21, 2023, at 11:11 AM revealed that she did not witness any abuse related to Resident 3, but that her staff told her about it, and she directed them to write statements and give them to the Director of Nursing (DON). She also indicated that she knows the statements were reviewed but the event was not investigated because it was determined it was not verbal abuse and that the alleged perpetrator is always loud. She did not know who made that determination. Interview with the DON on November 21, 2023, at 12:25 PM revealed that she did receive staff statements alleging verbal abuse by Employee 8, nurse aide, but that after review determined that it was not abuse or a reportable event. Review of the staff statements provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable environment on one of four nursing units (Heirloom unit; Residents 1 and 6). Findings included: Observation of Resident 1's bathroom on September 19, 2023, at 11:20 AM revealed that there was paint chipping on the inside door frame. The cover on the light over the sink was falling off. The mirror in the medicine cabinet was not fitted right and appears to be off track. There appeared to be rust on the shelves inside the medicine cabinet and on the frame outside of the cabinet. The inside of the toilet bowl was dirty with a black ring. There was loose dirt behind the toilet and around the toilet base. There was paint peeling on the left wall (when looking at the toilet) beside the toilet. Observation of Resident 6's room at 11:30 AM on September 19, 2023, revealed his overbed table had a white colored spillage on the wheelbase. Behind the head of Resident 6's bed there was a broken floor tile that appeared to be wet. Further observation revealed that there was water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, Pennsylvania State nurse aide registry information, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure current registry verification for one out of 20 registries reviewed (Employee 1). Findings include: Review of Employee 1's personnel file revealed that the facility hired her on June 5, 2023, and she began working in the facility on July 10, 2023. Further review revealed that Employee 1 completed the Personal Care Home and Assisted Living Direct Care Staff Training and Competency Test on November 15, 2023. Employee 1 did not complete a Pennsylvania State Nurse Aide Training Program, nor has she passed the Pennsylvania State Nurse Aide Written Examination or Skills Evaluation. A review of facility staffing records revealed that Employee 1 worked and provided resident care and services at the facility without appropriate Nurse Aide training and certification a total of 25 days since July 10, 2023. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 15, 2023, at 3:50 PM confirmed the above findings.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$154,786 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $20,885 — penalty dated 2025-10-07
  • $129,314 — penalty dated 2025-03-14
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EMBASSY PA TENANT 2 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/10/2020
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/10/2020
HANDLER, AARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/09/2022
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/09/2022
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
CIRIGNANO, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ROSCOE, BRANDONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$462K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 8%Medicare 4%Other / private 87%

This home reported $462K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,568per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395868. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next