Pickerington Care And Rehabilitation
1300 Hill Road North, Pickerington, OH 43147 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (614) 863-1858 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.8% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 36.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.6%CMS range 40.6–69.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.1–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.5–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, discharge notice review, hospital record review, discharge hearing document review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided timely and appropriate discharge planning after the administration of a discharge notice and failed to ensure residents were permitted to return to the facility following a hospitalization. This affected one resident (#72) of two reviewed for discharge with a 30-day notice. The facility census was 68.Findings include: Review of Resident #72's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 10/14/25 with diagnoses including fusion of the spine- cervical region, Ehler's-Danlos syndrome (a group of 13 inherited genetic conditions that affect collagen that results in weakened connective tissues), secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung, depression, anxiety disorder, and neoplasm related pain. Review of the resident's discharge planning plan of care dated 10/14/25 revealed the resident desired to be discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide hair care to a dependent resident. This affected one resident (#67) of four residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/21/26 and diagnoses including encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, contracture of muscle right upper arm, hypertension, anemia, diabetes, depression, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #67's 01/27/26 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the MDS was in progress and not yet completed. Review of assessments completed on 01/26/26 for Resident #67, in preparation for completing the MDS, revealed a brief interview for mental status score of zero indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired and the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living except eating, which the resident required setup assistance for. Review of Resident #67's shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable environment. This affected one resident (#67) of four residents reviewedt. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/21/26 and diagnoses including encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, contracture of muscle right upper arm, hypertension, anemia, diabetes, depression, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #67's 01/27/26 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the MDS was in progress and not yet completed. Review of assessments completed on 01/26/26 for Resident #67, in preparation for completing the MDS, revealed a brief interview for mental status score of zero indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired and the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living except eating, which the resident required setup assistance for. An observation of Resident #67's room on 01/27/26 at 11:55 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, facility failed to ensure the survey results binder was easily accessible to all residents. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. Facility census was 71. Findings include Observation on 09/25/25 at 11:34 A.M. revealed the survey book was located in the front hallway between the administration offices and the staff and visitor bathrooms. It was sitting in a folder shelf and the binder was bolted to the wall. The shelf sat about chest high on the wall and was pointed upward requiring a person to lift the binder up and out of the shelf which would be difficult for a resident sitting lower to the ground in a wheelchair. The chain was about 18-24 inches long and would not allow a resident to review the binder without standing in the hallway up against the wall. Interview on 09/25/25 at 2:00 P.M. with Director of Nursing revealed she did not know why the binder was chained to the wall and stated likely so residents would walk away with it or take it to their rooms. The Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain flooring for two residents (#53 and #67) out of 25 residents observed for environment. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure carpeting throughout facility was maintained in clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 71 facility residents.Findings include 1. Observation on 09/22/25 at 2:08 P.M. of Resident #53 and #67's room revealed flooring under and around the room air conditioner was peeling up about an inch off the floor and about eight tiles were affected. Observation and interview on 09/23/25 at 12:10 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #190 confirmed Resident #53 and #67's flooring was peeling up and stated he was aware of issues with flooring and was trying to get the broken flooring replaced in order of severity. He stated the facility had been working on replacing flooring and he had a list they were working through. He reported the facility had been working on the flooring for several months and had only completed five rooms.2. Observations from 09/22/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure splints ordered and care planned for residents with decreased range of motion were applied. This affected five (Resident #5, Resident #20, Resident #76, Resident #81 and Resident #87) of seven residents reviewed for mobility and position. The facility census was 71. 1. Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure, seizures, encephalopathy, dysphagia, tracheostomy and gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact (Rarely/Never understood). Resident #87 was dependent for oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. Resident #87 had an indwelling urinary catheter and is always incontinent of bowel. Review of the physicians orders revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to store and label frozen food in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had potential to affect 49 residents receiving prepared food from the facility's kitchen. The facility's census was 71.Findings Include:An observation on 09/22/25 at 8:45 A.M. during the initial kitchen tour revealed in the walk-in freezer a crate with an opened cardboard box of approximately 30 beef patties in a clear unsealed bag exposed to the open air, a cardboard box of frozen diced carrots in an unsealed opened blue plastic bag exposed to the open air, an opened cardboard box of frozen peas in an unsealed blue plastic bag located under the box of frozen diced carrots the bag of frozen peas were exposed to the bottom of the cardboard box of frozen carrots, and there was an opened cardboard box of frozen green bears in an opened unsealed blue plastic bag which was opened to the air. There were no open dates on any of the four cardboard boxes of frozen food.An interview on 09/22/25 at 9:00 A.M. with the Dietary Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, manufacturers guidelines, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during finger stick blood glucose monitoring. This affected one (Resident #15 ) of one reviewed for Fingerstick blood glucose monitoring. It had the potential to affected three additional residents (Resident #51, #57 and #80) on 100 hall who receive a finger stick blood sugar. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene during meal service. This affect three residents (Residents #20, #26, and #69) out of nine residents observed eating the lunch meal in the main dining room. The census was 71.Findings include:1. Observation completed on 09/24/2025 at 7:35 A.M. of a fingerstick blood sugar for Resident #15 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #196 placed the glucometer on the resident's overbed table without a barrier under the glucometer. LPN #196 put on gloves, and obtained the blood sample then placed the glucometer on a tissue. LPN #196 removed her gloves and put on new gloves without performing hand hygiene. LPN #196 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner by providing privacy during care and treatment. This affected three (Resident #52, #73 and #87) of 22 residents in the survey sample. The census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, esophageal obstruction. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73's cognition was severely impaired. He required supervision and/or touching supervision for oral hygiene, dependent for toileting, shower/bathing and setup/clean up assistance for personal hygiene. On 09/24/25 at 8:25 A.M. an observation of Resident #73, revealed after preparing the medication's for the resident, Registered Nurse (RN) #194 checked the gastrostomy tube for residual and by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected two residents (#25 and #26) of 25 residents rooms observed. The census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/22/23 with the diagnoses including, but not limited to, respiratory failure, epilepsy, anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #26's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, he was dependent on staff for completion of bathing and personal hygiene tasks, was independent with eating and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the facility's weekly cleaning schedule revealed on Saturday wheelchairs for residents in odd numbered rooms would be cleaned, and on Sunday wheelchairs for residents in even numbered rooms would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing the use of hand splints for a resident with contractures. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #5) out of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 71.Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed admission date 03/03/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive heart failure (CHF), anoxic brain damage, respiratory failure, ventilator dependent, high blood pressure and anxiety. Review of Resident #5's quarterly [NAME] Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for all care. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/17/25 for staff to don bilateral resting hand splints up to 6 hours daily as tolerated and to check skin integrity and circulation every shift. Review of Resident #5's Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, facility failed to revise a dental care plan for two Residents (#32 and #60) and a vision care plan for one Resident (#82). This affected three residents (#32, #60 and #82) out of 25 residents in the survey sample. Facility census was 71. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/03/25. Diagnoses included cardiac arrest, open wound to the buttock, malnutrition, spinal stenosis, vascular disease, dysphagia, muscle weakness, intellectual disabilities, retention urine. Review of the plan of care dated 02/06/25 revealed the resident had an impaired dental status as evidenced by dentures. It noted the resident lost some/all natural teeth with interventions to arrange for dental consults and follow up visits by dentistry as needed. Review of dental visit note dated 03/28/25 revealed the resident wore dentures. Review of progress note dated 07/15/25 revealed the resident returned from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for dependent care residents. This deficient practice affected three residents (Residents #26, #77, and #80) out of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care for dependent residents. The facility's census was 71.Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/22/23 with the diagnoses including, but not limited to, respiratory failure, epilepsy, anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #26's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of possible 15 and was dependent on staff for completion of bathing and personal hygiene tasks. Review of Resident #26's ADL care plan dated 06/07/23 revealed Resident #26 required staff assistance with personal hygiene tasks. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing resident centered activities program that incorporated the resident's interests, hobbies and cultural preferences. This affected one (Resident #87) of four residents observed for activities. The census was 71.Findings include: Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure, seizures, encephalopathy, dysphagia, tracheostomy and gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively impaired, he was dependent upon staff for oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. He also had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed he enjoyed listening to music, staff would offer one to one visits for stimulation and staff would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a delay in treatment for a resident requiring antibiotic use (Resident #1). This affected one resident (Residents #1) out of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 71.Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed admission date of 08/14/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to pleural effusion, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, depression, high blood pressure, and anxiety. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed on 09/10/25 at 9:33 P.M. Resident #1 showed the nurse a medication cup with brown/tan colored sputum in it. Notification was made to MedOne and an order was received for a chest X-ray and to complete a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) test, with the COVID-19 test results being negative at 10:17 P.M. Review of the chest X-ray results dated 09/11/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Resident #1 had bilateral lower lobe atelectasis (complete or partial collapse of a lung or a section of lung) with possible right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely follow up for ophthalmology services for one Resident (#82) of one reviewed for ophthalmology services. Facility census was 71. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 08/24/20. Diagnoses included acute cystitis, sepsis, diabetes type two, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Review of the plan of care dated 04/21/22 revealed the resident was at risk for visual decline and wore glasses. Interventions included encourage the resident to wear glasses, keep call light in reach, and keep glasses in a safe space. The care plan did not include any mention of changes in vision, increased blurring of vision or recommendations for cataract surgery. Review of the eye exam dated 04/17/25 revealed cataract surgery was recommended for Resident #82 with a follow up in four to five months. It stated to continue wearing glasses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for Resident #32 who utilized a Foley catheter. This affected one resident (#32) of one reviewed for catheters. Facility census was 71. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/03/25. Diagnoses included cardiac arrest, open wound to the buttock, malnutrition, spinal stenosis, vascular disease, dysphagia, muscle weakness, intellectual disabilities, retention urine. Review of the plan of care dated 02/06/25 revealed the resident had potential for complications related to use of the Foley (indwelling) catheter. The catheter was indicated due to obstructive uropathy. Interventions included change Foley catheter as needed for plugging or displacement, notify the physician if there was a change in urine color consistency or output, obtain output each shift and total for 24-hour period, and provide Foley care per facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure dietary adaptive equipment was provided for a dependent resident. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #20) out of two residents reviewed for adaptive equipment use. The facility census was 71.Findings Include:Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed admission date 11/14/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to high blood pressure, depression, dementia, contractures, and dysphagia.Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had impaired cognition with a brief Interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 9 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #20 required assistance with meal set and was dependent for cares.Review of Resident #20 physician orders revealed an order dated 09/03/25 for resident to utilize scoop plate and two handled cup with lid for all meals to increase functional independence.Review of Resident #20's nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feedings were labeled and dated when the feeding was initiated and hung for administration. This affected three (Resident #10, #39 and #81) of six residents with enteral feedings. The census was 71. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, depression, anxiety, atrial fib, tracheostomy and gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact (BIMS 15). Requires partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene, dependent on toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and substantial maximal assistance for turning and repositioning. Resident was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the physicians orders on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, facility failed to follow pain order parameters for Resident #61. The facility also failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions to two Residents (#8 and #61) of two reviewed for pain. Facility census was 71. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 07/30/25. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer, diabetes, respiratory failure with hypoxia, lymphedema and anxiety. Review of physician orders on 08/01/25 revealed an order for Oxycodone HCl (opioid) tablet 5 milligram (mg) with instructions to give one every four hours as needed for pain rating of 1-4 with 30 mg daily maximum. Review of physician orders on 08/01/25 revealed an order for Morphine Sulfate (opioid) 20 mg/milliliter (ml) with instructions to give 0.5 ml by mouth every 12 hours as needed for pain of 5-10. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure resident requests were follow up on in a timely manner. This affected one Resident (#93) of four observed for call lights. Facility census was 71. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 09/18/25. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, necrotizing fasciitis, anorexia, and lack of coordination. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating impaired cognition. Interview on 09/22/25 at 1:48 P.M. with Resident #93 revealed she wanted something for pain and also wanted the nurse to look at a wound on her leg. Resident was requested to activate her call light to inform staff. Observation on 09/22/25 at 1:51 P.M. Activity Aide (AA) #157 answered the call light and deactivated it. AA answered several other call lights and talked with several staff in the hallway including the assigned nurse. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. This affected two (Resident #8 and Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. he census was 71.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include acute and chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), seizures, dependence on respirators, schizoaffective disorder and depression. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was moderately impaired. She was independent with eating, required supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, and dependent on staff for shower/bathing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #8 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Pharmacy Medication Regime Review completed on 11/15/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely follow up for dental services for one Resident (#32) of three reviewed for dental services. Facility census was 71. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/03/25. Diagnoses included cardiac arrest, open wound to the buttock, malnutrition, spinal stenosis, vascular disease, dysphagia, muscle weakness, intellectual disabilities, retention urine. Resident #32's payer source was Medicare.Review of the plan of care dated 02/06/25 revealed the resident had an impaired dental status as evidenced by dentures. It noted the resident lost some/all natural teeth with interventions to arrange for dental consults and follow up visits by dentistry as needed. Review of dental visit note dated 03/28/25 revealed the resident wore dentures. Review of progress note dated 07/15/25 revealed the resident returned from a hospital stay back to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to treat pressure ulcers for Resident #100. This affected one resident (#100) of three residents sampled for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including aortic aneurysm, cerebral infarction, respiratory failure with ventilator dependence, contractures, functional quadriplegia and encephalopathy. Review of the Specialty Physician Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 09/11/24 revealed Resident #100 had a sacrum Stage IV (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer) pressure wound that had epithelialized and resolved. The specialty physician signed off on care of the resident on this date as the sacrum area had resolved and made recommendations to continue present skin care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for Resident #100. This affected one resident (#100) of three residents sampled. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including aortic aneurysm, cerebral infarction, respiratory failure with ventilator dependence, functional quadriplegia and encephalopathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was severely impaired for daily decision-making, had no pressure ulcers and had a pressure relieving device on the bed. Review of the nursing Skin Grid Non-Pressure assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 developed a right lateral sacrum abscess 1.5 centimeters (cm) in length (l) by 1.0 (cm) in width (w). Review of the physician Progress Note dated 10/17/24 revealed reason for the visit was to address chronic conditions including sacral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices and ensure accurate isolation precaution sign were removed when ordered. This affected two residents (#9 and #103) during random observations. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #103 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including primary central nervous system lymphoma, altered mental status, anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the brain and depression. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated December 2024 revealed Resident #103 utilized an air mattress to her bed. Review of the Braden Score Evaluation dated 12/21/24 revealed Resident #103 was at low risk for skin breakdown. On 12/26/24 at 8:12: A.M. and 9:58 A.M., observation of Resident #103's room revealed the footboard was missing and the air mattress pump was sitting on the floor with no barrier. The front of the air mattress pump could not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of manufacture's guidelines, the facility failed to dispose expired Covid 19 vaccine syringes. This had the potential to affect any resident receiving a Covid 19 vaccine or booster vaccine. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Observation on [DATE] at 10:58 A.M. revealed an opened box of Spikevax (Covid 19) vaccine located in the back drawer of the medication storage refrigerator located in the North unit's medication storage room. Inside the opened box were two pre-filled syringes remaining out of the original ten pre-filled syringes with lot number #3032713 and expiration date [DATE]. There were no opened dates observed on the box or on the syringes. Interview on [DATE] at 11:10 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit Manager (UM) # 560 confirmed the two pre-filled syringes in the opened box of Spikevax (Covid 19) vaccine with expiration date [DATE]. LPN UM #560 stated the vaccines would be administered on request from resident. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#175) was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one of one resident reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #175 revealed an initial admission date of 07/18/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to human metapneumovirus pneumonia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, pulmonary fibrosis, Parkinsonism, dementia with moderate mood disorder, dystonia, anxiety disorder, depression, presence of neurostimulator, insomnia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, acquired absence of other genital organs, vitamin D deficiency, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, unspecified voice and resonance disorder and other symbolic dysfunctions. Review of the resident's admission assessment with baseline plan of care dated 07/18/24 revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Manual review, the facility failed to complete an initial comprehensive, accurate standardized Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) within the first 14 days following admission to the facility for two residents (#175 and #177) and failed to accurately assess and code the oral status of one resident (#30) on the annual MDS. This affected three residents (Resident #175,#177, and #20) of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #175 revealed an initial admission date of 07/18/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to human metapneumovirus pneumonia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, pulmonary fibrosis, Parkinsonism, dementia with moderate mood disorder, dystonia, anxiety disorder, depression, presence of neurostimulator, insomnia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, acquired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents for possible medication side effects. This affected two (Resident #11 and Resident #19) of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/23/19 and diagnoses of schizophrenia and parkinson's disease. The resident was receiving an antipsychotic medication (Seroquel 250 milligrams daily), an atypical antipsychotic (nuplazid 34 mg daily), an anticonvulsant medication (Depakote 1000 mg daily), an antidepressant/sedative medication (trazodone 50 mg daily), an antianxiety medication (Ativan 1 mg daily), an anxiolytic medication (buspar 15 mg daily), an antidepressant medication (sertraline 100 mg daily), and a sleep aide (melatonin 6 mg daily). Review of a minimum data set assessment of 07/01/24 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Observations on 07/31/24 at 9:01 A.M. and 1:36 P.M. and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to document the reason for decline in gradual does reduction of antipsychotropic medications for one resident (#8). This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an initial admission date of 03/30/22 with the latest readmission of 01/02/24 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia or hyercapnia, Duchenne or [NAME] muscular dystrophy, ileus, protein calorie malnutrition, dependence on ventilator, pain, pleural effusion, acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, neuromuscular dysfunction, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, depression, contracture of muscles, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, anemia, GERD, cardiomyopathy, constipation, tachycardia, contracture of left hand, dysphagia and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the plan of care dated 01/02/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection in the area of droplet isolation. This affected one resident (#175) of three residents reviewed for transmission based precautions (TBP). The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #175 revealed an initial admission date of 07/18/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to human metapneumovirus pneumonia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, pulmonary fibrosis, Parkinsonism, dementia with moderate mood disorder, dystonia, anxiety disorder, depression, presence of neurostimulator, insomnia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, acquired absence of other genital organs, vitamin D deficiency, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, unspecified voice and resonance disorder and other symbolic dysfunctions. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#181) call light was within reach to call staff for assistance. This affected one of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: On 07/30/24 at 1:59 P.M., observation of Resident #181 revealed his call light was laying on the floor on a floor mat next to his bed out of reach. On 07/30/24 at 2:30 P.M., interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #553 revealed the resident had no speech, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and the call light was the only means to alert staff of any needs. STNA #553 verified the resident's call light was on the floor out of his reach. On 07/31/24 at 1:59 P.M., observation of Resident #181 revealed the resident's call light was laying on the floor on a floor mat next to his bed. STNA #590 verified the resident's call light was not within reach and had no ability to summon facility staff for needs. Review of the facility policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, dated 04/01/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, facility policy, family and staff interviews the facility failed to allow Resident #61 and #31 to exercise their right to be informed, choice and participate in the care being provided. This affected two of two residents, (#61, #31) reviewed for planning and implementing care. The facility census was 70. Findings: 1. Record review of Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 05/01/23 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, gastrostomy tube, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right side, chronic respiratory failure, seizures, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer of sacral region, anorexia, anemia, dysphagia, hypertension, aphasia, candidiasis of mouth and contracture of muscle of right hand. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 61's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not calculated due to the resident's inability to answer the question, indicating he had a severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to document communication of change of condition requiring new antibiotic treatments of one resident (#64) out of one resident reviewed for change in condition and failed to provide failed to provide documentation of communication for resident's dental service needs and antibiotic orders for one resident (#61) out of one reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1.Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Acute Respiratory failure with hypoxia, critical illness myopathy, dependence on ventilator, obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure, hypertension, repeated falls, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, sepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #64 revealed mild cognitive impairment with no delirium or psychosis. Resident #64 had total dependence on assistance for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and facility comprehensive care plan policy, this facility failed to develop a person center care plan to accurately reflect a resident target behavior of yelling. This affected one (Resident #30) of the two residents reviewed for mood and behavior care. The facility census was 70. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, Pseudobulbar Affect (symptoms include frequent and uncontrolled crying and/or laughing), and major depressive disorder recurrent with severe psychotic symptoms. Review of Resident #30's behavior monitoring order dated 05/25/23 and discontinued 08/09/23 revealed Behavior Monitoring due to anxiolytic medication, document number of episodes per shift of target behavior, target behavior includes, 1-withdrawn, 2-restlessness, 3-excessive worrying. Review of Resident #30's behavior monitoring order dated 08/09/23 revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, dialysis center interview, and facility Dialysis policy review, this facility failed to ensure Dialysis care plans were up to date to accurately reflect residents current Dialysis center and treatment days. This affected one (Resident #54) of the one resident reviewed for Dialysis care. Facility census was 70. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/16/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anemia, personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism, decreased white blood cell count, thrombocytopenia, dependence of oxygen, acute upper respiratory infection, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the plan of care dated 11/16/22 and revised on 12/02/22 revealed Resident #54 had potential for complications related to the diagnosis of renal failure/end stage renal disease requiring Dialysis treatment. Dialysis services were to be completed at Fresenius Kidney Care on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide activities services for two out of two residents, (Resident #17 and #35 ) reviewed for activities services. The census was 70. Findings: 1. Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 7/26/14 with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain syndrome, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. Review of the annual activity evaluation completed on 09/01/22 revealed that Resident #17 preferred activities in own room and outside including spiritual or religious, walking/wheeling out or indoors, and watching TV. Review of plan of care dated 08/01/14 revealed an activity deficit, with interventions in place including providing 1 on 1 as needed and to invite or encourage or assist to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely implement a new treatment for Resident #40's pressure ulcer as recommended by the wound doctor. This affected one resident (#40) of eight residents with pressure ulcers reviewed. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/05/22 and diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, dependence on respirator, type two diabetes mellitus, contracture of bilateral hands and ankles, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anxiety, and cardiac arrest. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was comatose. She was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care dated 07/13/23 revealed Resident #40 had a pressure ulcer to her right buttock. Interventions included an air mattress as ordered, evaluating for pain and providing interventions, continuing wound treatment as ordered, nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, facility fall investigations, and facility fall policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for residents with a history of falls or who were at risk for falls. This affected two (Resident #36 and #24) of the three residents reviewed for fall interventions. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 11/15/22. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, encephalopathy, weakness, adult failure to thrive, repeated falls, abnormalities of gait, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05 out of 15 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #36 required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, Dialysis center agreement review and facility Dialysis policy, this facility failed to have a signed agreement between the facility and dialysis center affecting one (Resident #54) of the one resident reviewed for Dialysis services. The facility census was 70. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/16/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anemia, personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism, decreased white blood cell count, thrombocytopenia, dependence of oxygen, acute upper respiratory infection, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #54 was noted to be receiving diuretic medication daily and receiving Dialysis services. Review of Resident #54's Dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication parameters were followed for Resident #62. This affected one resident (#62) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 had an admission date of 05/05/23 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with dependence on respirator, paraplegia, total retinal detachment, traumatic cerebral edema, dysphagia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 06/10/23 revealed Resident #62 had the potential for alteration in comfort or had actual alteration in comfort related to inability to move independently, skin alteration, surgical site, and trauma. Interventions included asking the resident regarding location, severity, and type of pain, attempting non-pharmacologic interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete behavior monitoring for two residents (#16 and #30) on antianxiety medication. This affected two residents (#16 and #30) of two residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with dependence on respirator, depression, type two diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition. She received antianxiety and antidepressant medications. Review of the plan of care dated 04/07/22 revealed Resident #16 had a potential for adverse side effects of psychotropic drug use. She had anxiolytic and antidepressant drug therapy related to depression and anxiety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview ,record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document wound treatments as completed for three residents (#40, #48, and #60). This affected three residents (#40, #48, and #60) of eight residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility further failed to provide documentation of oral assessments and usage of antibiotics and communication for resident's dental service needs and antibiotic orders for one resident (#61) out of one reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/05/22 and diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, dependence on respirator, type two diabetes mellitus, contracture of bilateral hands and ankles, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anxiety, and cardiac arrest. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was comatose. She was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure the urine collection bags were kept off the floor. This was observed for two residents (#33 and #60) out of 14 residents with indwelling catheters. The facility census was 70. 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission [DATE]. Diagnoses include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on ventilator, dementia, myoclonus, dysphagia, seizures, chronic kidney disease, contracture of left knee, left shoulder, and right shoulder, cystostomy, neurogenic bladder and urine retention, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 is in a persistent vegetative state with no discernible consciousness. Resident #33 is totally dependent for all mobility and sell care categories. Resident #33 has an indwelling catheter and is always incontinent of stool. Observation on 08/09/23 at 09:34 A.M. revealed Resident #33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility antibiotic stewardship policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had orders for receiving antibiotic cream had the location for the cream to be applied and a stop date for the antibiotic cream. This effected one (Resident #222) of the five residents reviewed for appropriate medication regimen. The facility census was 70. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #222 revealed an admission date of 07/26/23. Diagnoses included a stable burst fracture of first lumbar vertebra, confusion of part of head, laceration without foreign body of right hand, and falls. Review of Resident #222's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Review of Resident #222's physician orders for August 2023 revealed a order for Bacitracin ointment, 500 units per gram. Apply to per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-11-17 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and policy review, facility failed to ensure mail was available to residents on Saturdays. This affected three residents (#13, #19 and #71) out of four residents interviewed in the resident council, and had the potential to affect all facility residents. Facility census was 71. Findings include:Interviews during the resident council meeting on 09/25/25 from 11:00A.M. to 11:30 A.M. with Residents #13, #19 and #71 complained they did not receive any mail on Saturdays. They stated it was delivered on Saturday, but no one got it from the mailbox and passed it out. They all reported they only got mail Monday through Friday.Interview on 09/25/25 at 11:35 A.M. with Receptionist #167 revealed she worked Monday through Friday and got the mail from the mailbox in front of the building and put mail for staff in their mailboxes and mail for residents in the Activities mailbox to be passed out by activity staff. The receptionist revealed she did not work on the weekends and no one checks the mailbox on the weekends. She stated she would get Saturday and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-26 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure daily nursing staff data was posted as required. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: On 12/26/24 at 8:10 A.M., observation of the reception area revealed the Daily Staffing Log posted was dated 12/24/24. This was verified by Business Office Manager (BOM) #211 at the time of the observation. On 12/26/24 at 9:17 A.M., interview with BOM #211 verified the nursing staff information had not been posted on 12/25/24 or 12/26/24 because staff responsible for posting the data was off on 12/25/24 due to the holiday and were just now returning to work. On 12/26/24 at approximately 4:15 P.M., interview with the Administrator stated the required nursing staff information was behind the posting dated 12/24/24 but had not been flipped over on 12/25/24. This deficiency was an incidental finding identified during the complaint investigation.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2020 |
| 2020 GSR DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/09/2022 |
| AARON HANDLER FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/09/2022 |
| AH DYNASTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/09/2022 |
| GEORGE S. REPCHICK 2020 FAMILY DYNASTY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/09/2022 |
| HANDLER, AARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2020 |
| REPCHICK, GEORGE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2020 |
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2020 |
| HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2020 |
| KUNAKA, KUDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| WILLIAMS, ELIJAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $490K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365636. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.