Seasons Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 48.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, taste of a test tray, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable temperature. This affected nine residents (#3, #6, #12, #13, #23, #27, #33, #40, and #45) and had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing at the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Interviews on 03/03/25 between 10:07 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. with Resident #3, #6, #12, #23, #40 and #45 revealed their food was not warm enough when served. Observation and interview on 03/03/25 at 12:11 P.M. of the food/tray service in the dining room revealed the steam table sat in the dining room in front of the kitchen entrance door. Dietary Manager #221 and Dietary Assistant #232 were plating the residents food from the steam table. The meal included meatball subs with mozzarella cheese, French fries and strawberries and bananas mixed with cottage cheese. There was no steam coming from the steam table and the plug to the steam table was lying on the floor and not plugged in. Dietary Manager #221…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment used for storing and serving residents hot foods from was in good, working condition. This affected nine residents (#3, #6, #12, #13, #23, #27, #33, #40, and #45) and had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing at the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Interview on 03/03/25 between 10:07 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. with Residents #3, #6, #12, #23, #40 and #45 stated their food was not warm enough when served. Observation and interview on 03/03/25 at 12:11 P.M. of the food/tray service in the dining room revealed the steam table sat in the dining room in front of the kitchen entrance door. Dietary Manager #221 and Dietary Assistant #232 were plating the residents' food from the steam table. There was no steam coming from the steam table and the plug to the steam table was lying on the floor and not plugged in. Dietary Manager #221 stated there was no outlet within reach that supported the cord. The steam table was purchased approximately six months ago, and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was maintained in a safe, sanitary. and comfortable environment. This affected one resident (#40) and had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: Record review for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 03/02/21. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, seizures, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Observation on 03/03/25 at 10:24 A.M. of Resident #40's room revealed the walls had several deep gouges (make (a groove, hole, or indentation) with or as with a sharp tool or blade), in all of the walls. The walls were also dirty. There was a vent on the floor next to Resident #40's bed that was not secured to the floor and was approximately two to three inches shorter than the hole made for a floor vent. The bottom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-05-24 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff were checked against the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to employment to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Employee Changes form revealed the facility hired fifteen new employees from 05/23/22 to 05/23/23. Of those fifteen new employees, the facility did not check seven new employees against the nurse aide registry (NAR) for indications of abuse including Registered Nurse (RN) #820 hired 10/13/22; Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #822 hired 10/19/22; Dietary Aide #831 hired 11/01/22; RN #815 hired 12/05/22; RN #809 hired 02/03/23; RN #837 hired 03/08/23; and [NAME] #830 hired 04/05/23. Interview on 05/23/23 at 10:55 A.M. with Business Office Manager(BOM)/Human Resources (HR) #805 confirmed all new hires were not checked against the nurse aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that leftovers and food out of its original container were labeled and dated properly. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen on 05/21/23 from 8:00 A.M. through 8:20 A.M. with [NAME] #828 revealed the following was not labeled or dated in the walk-in refrigerator: one half wrapped watermelon, a pan of cooked cheeseburgers, an opened bag with wilted salad mix, and a pan of fruited gelatin. In the freezer there was chicken and corn wrapped with no label or date on the bags. [NAME] #828 verified the findings and stated that everything that was opened must be labeled and dated. Interview on 05/22/23 at 2:30 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD) #901 revealed she audits the kitchen monthly and her concerns that have been addressed was labeling and dating of food. Review of the updated facility policy titled; Date Marking revealed an established procedure for date marking shall be utilized by the facility. Two options for date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to exercise their rights without coercion related to smoking. This affected four (Residents #12, #24, #30 and #34) of the 19 residents who smoked but had the potential to affect all residents (Residents #4, #6, #10, #11, #12, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #26, #28, #29, #30, #31, #34, #35, #38 and #43) who smoked. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental disorder having delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech and behavior), dementia and anxiety. His mother was his legal guardian. Review of the admission packet and agreement dated 05/16/13 revealed Resident #12's legal guardian signed for resident rights including that the center must ensure the resident can exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the center. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were timely completed and transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) System. This affected four (Residents #18, #30, #37 and #42) of 24 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility had a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 02/14/11 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that has symptoms of both schizophrenia and bipolar) and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Assessments for Resident #18 revealed he had a quarterly assessment dated for 04/12/23. The assessment was completed on 04/26/23 and stated export ready, however, had not been transmitted to the CMS system within 14 days. Interview on 05/21/23 at 3:24 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #807 verified Resident #18's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted residents with grooming and provide showers per resident preference and schedule. This affected four (Residents #12, #24, #30 and #34) of four reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility had a census of 50 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/16/13 with diagnoses including Schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, depression and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 revealed he had impaired cognition. He needed extensive assistance of one staff member for toileting, limited assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene and physical help of one staff member during bathing. Review of the facility shower schedule, undated, revealed Resident #12 was to have showers on Mondays and Thursdays on dayshift. Review of the State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) Point of Care (POC)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and well-maintained environment. This affected six residents (Resident #3, #5, #12, #23, #27, and #45) with the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/21/23 at 8:45 A. M. revealed Resident #3's wheelchair was dirty with dust and dried food on it. Observation verified by Registered Nurse (RN) #843 at time of observation was dirty. 2. Observation on 05/21/23 at 8:48 A.M. revealed Resident #5's chest harness restraint and wheelchair was dirty with dust and dried food on it. Interview at time of observation with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #900 stated she was not sure how to clean the chest harness restraint. 3. An environmental tour was conducted on 05/22/23 from 09:40 AM to 10:05 AM with confirmation from Maintenance Director #808 and Housekeeping Supervisor #847 of the following concerns: a. liquid splatter on hallway walls in the dining room and outside of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident #2's guardian of a new reddened chapped area on her chin, failed to notify Resident #5's guardian and physician of a new restraint order and failed to notify Resident #30's guardian of an open area on the back of his left hand. This finding affected three (Residents #2, #5 and #30) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, unspecified intellectual disabilities and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she had a legal guardian who was her responsible party. Observation on 05/21/23 at 11:29 A.M. revealed Resident #2 had a rash under her chin area. Interview on 05/21/23 at 11:40 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #809…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

What families pay in OH