No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Embassy Of Woodview

2770 Clime Road, Columbus, OH 43223 · For profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (614) 276-8222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$151,356 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $151,356 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3387 Farm Bank Way · (614) 782-3668 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3499 Clime Rd · (614) 276-2651 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2774 Briggs Rd · (614) 279-2200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2634 Briggs Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.2%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.5%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.0%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
68.9%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 67.2 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-13)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of hospital records, review of physician's notes and wound assessments, appointment reminder notice review, interviews with residents, family, outside entities, and staff, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate, timely and necessary care and services, including timely re-scheduling of vascular surgeon appointments for Resident #100, who had vascular wounds to meet the resident's total care needs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm beginning on 07/16/24 when a vascular surgery follow-up appointment (with plans to discuss blood flow to the resident's lower extremities) was canceled with no evidence of attempts by facility staff to re-schedule or schedule a new vascular surgery consult until 08/14/24, when an appointment was made for the following week with a new vascular surgeon. However, prior to the appointment, on 08/18/24, Resident #100 suffered a significant change in condition with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, hospital documentation, observation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to initiate treatment and complete an accurate assessment for a suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) [persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration of the skin] to the bilateral buttocks upon admission on [DATE] for Resident #174. Actual Harm occurred on 05/07/25 when Resident #174's SDTI to the bilateral buttocks worsened to four stage III pressure ulcers (full thickness skin loss in which the fat is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue as well as rolled wound edges are often present) due to not following the Wound Certified Nurse Practitioner's recommendations. The facility also failed to implement pressure ulcer wound care treatments timely for two additional residents (#27 and #47) that placed the residents at risk for the potential for more than minimal harm that was not actual harm. This affected three of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's blood glucose levels and oxygen saturations as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #150) of three residents revied for changes in condition. The facility census was 74. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #150 revealed an admission date of 07/14/25 and a discharge date of 07/16/25. Diagnoses included ischemic cardiomyopathy, type two diabetes mellitus (DM), and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #150 had intact short-term memory and was independent for daily decision-making abilities. Review of Resident #150's physician orders for July 2025 revealed the orders included Humulin R 500-unit (U) Kwikpen (insulin), inject 40 units subcutaneous in the morning and inject 60 units in the evening for type two DM and Trulicity three milligram (mg) per 0.5 milliliter (ml), inject 0.5 ml subcutaneous once a day, every seven days for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #174. This affected one resident of one resident reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions and had the potential to affect all 23 residents on the hall. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #174, revealed an admission date of 04/29/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to acute embolism and thrombosis unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, anxiety disorder, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, and Type II Diabetes Mellitus without complications. Review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 04/29/25 revealed Resident #174 to be a 15 indicated cognitive intactness. Review of the plan of care dated 04/29/25 for Resident #174 revealed the resident had an actual area of skin impairment with no interventions for enhanced barrier precautions. Review of a skin grid pressure documentation dated 04/30/25 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient supply of washcloths, hand towels and bath towels to complete resident care. This shortage affected two residents (#8 and #21) and had potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to facility on 10/27/22 with primary diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease and additional diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Type II Diabetes, anxiety and depression. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/10/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Interview on 05/08/25 at 8:28 A.M. with Resident #8 revealed she believed there was a shortage of washcloths and towels every other day. Resident #8 said because of the shortage, her showers had been delayed until 3rd shift on multiple occasions. Resident #8 stated her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #47) had access to her personal property a motorized wheel chair. This affected one (#47) of two reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acquired absence of left and right leg below the knee, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, pain and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident 47's admission record reveals she arrived to the facility with an electric wheelchair. Review of the medical record revealed there was no assessments completed for the safe use of the electric wheelchair. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 02/22/25 revealed Resident #47 mobility is severely limited and requires the use of a wheelchair. Review of progress note dated dated 08/18/24 at 8:23 P.M. revealed Resident #47 ran into another resident in her electric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the faciltiy failed to monitor and provide timely/adequate treatments and care for non-pressure skin issues. This affected two (Resident #27 and #47) of six residents reviewed for skin issues. The census was 70. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27, revealed an admission date of 3/30/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 09 suggested moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require total dependence on toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, bed mobility and transfers. The resident was also assessed to have a foley catheter, to always be incontinent of bowel and to be at risk for pressure ulcer injury. Review of the plan of care dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper parameters for as needed pain medications. This affected two (Resident #3 and #48) of five residents reviewed for medications. Also, the facility failed to follow parameters prior to administering medications. This affected two (Residents #48 and #5) of five residents reviewed for medications. The census was 70. Findings Include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, anemia, adult failure to thrive, alcohol dependence, schizoaffective disorder, personal history of traumatic brain injury, diabetes mellitus, type II diabetes, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, and bipolar II disorder. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3 current physician orders found the following: Ibuprofen (non steroidal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, review of a Medication Error form, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents medications were administered as ordered. This affected four (#42, #50, #63 and #71) out of the seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebral infarction, and anoxic brain damage. Review of the physicians order, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was to be administered the anticoagulant Lovenox 15 milligrams (mg) once a day to prevent deep vein thrombosis (blood clot). Review of the physicians order, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was to be administered the anticonvulsant levetiracetam 7.5 mg twice a day for seizures. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 02/2025 revealed scheduled doses of Lovenox were documented to have not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interview, review of a Medication Error form, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation was maintained in residents medical records. This affected three (#50, #63, and #71) out of the seven residents whose medical records were reviewed. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #63 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute osteomyelitis of the right of the right ankle and foot, sepsis, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the physicians order, dated 12/24/24, revealed the resident was to be administered the antidiabetic medication Rybelsus 3 mg once daily in the morning. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 01/2025 revealed scheduled doses of Rybelsus were documented to have been administered as ordered on 01/01/25, 01/02/25, 01/07/25, 01/08/25, and 01/10/25. Review of the progress note, dated 01/05/25, revealed Rybelsus not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preference for showers was honored. This affected one (#110) of six resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 72. Findings include Review of the closed medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 04/29/24. Medical diagnoses for Resident #110 included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, osteoarthritis, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #110's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 08/24/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident's ability to shower/bathe self was coded as resident refused. Review of Resident #110's care plan, dated 04/30/24 and revised on 09/09/24, revealed the resident required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) related to diagnoses of COPD, acute respiratory failure, and osteoarthritis. Listed interventions included the resident required weight-bearing assistance with showers by one helper. An additional care plan focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to timely notify a resident's family of a change in condition. This affected one (#58) of six residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 05/03/23. Medical diagnoses included vascular dementia, congestive heart failure, and acute COVID-19. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 08/14/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #58's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed a note dated 09/10/24 at 1:05 P.M. which stated Resident #58 tested positive for COVID-19 infection. Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #825 was notified and new orders were received. Resident #58 was seen by Medical Director (MD) #900 on 09/11/24 who noted the resident had an acute COVID-19 infection. Resident #58 was recorded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, family interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #110's family and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was timely notified of the resident's facility-initiated 30-day discharge notice, emergency transfer and subsequent emergency discharge. This affected one (#110) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #110 revealed an original admission date of 04/29/24. Medical diagnoses included bipolar disorder, anxiety, and depression. Resident #110 was emergently transferred to out outside hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #110's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 08/24/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #110 was not recorded as having any hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary infection control practices were maintained during a dressing change. This affected one (#27) and had the potential to affect sixteen residents who the facility identified as receiving wound care. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/13/24. Medical diagnoses included sepsis, chronic kidney disease stage III, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 07/20/24, revealed the resident was identified as cognitively intact. He had no recorded behaviors or rejection of care. Resident #27 was identified to require partial/moderate to dependent assistance with activities of daily living and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #27's care plan, dated as initiated 07/13/24 and revised on 09/12/24, revealed the resident had actual areas of skin impairment as the resident was admitted with vascular wounds to his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of video footage, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#66) was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 02/03/23 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with left sided hemiplegia, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), polyneuropathy, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, constipation, cannabis use, nicotine dependence, and history of COVID-19. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficit. Review of the mood and behavior revealed the resident displayed no behaviors. The resident required extensive assistance of two residents for bed mobility, transfers, toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation of video footage, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. This affected one (#66) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 02/03/23 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with left sided hemiplegia, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), polyneuropathy, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, constipation, cannabis use, nicotine dependence, and history of COVID-19. Review of the plan of care dated 02/13/23 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to CVA with left sided hemiplegia. Interventions included assist in choosing appropriate clothing as needed, check nails daily for length and cleanliness, trim and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#66), who was dependent on staff received routine nail care. This affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 02/03/23 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with left sided hemiplegia, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), polyneuropathy, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, constipation, cannabis use, nicotine dependence, and history of COVID-19. Review of the plan of care dated 02/13/23 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to CVA with left sided hemiplegia. Interventions included assist in choosing appropriate clothing as needed, check nails daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of video footage, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#66) who was at high risk for falls and had a history of falls received the care and supervision for safe transfers. This affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 02/03/23 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with left sided hemiplegia, aphasia, dysphagia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), polyneuropathy, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, constipation, cannabis use, nicotine dependence, and history of COVID-19. Review of the plan of care dated 02/13/23 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to CVA with left sided hemiplegia. Interventions included assist in choosing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of menus, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed to meet the nutritional needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #30) who did not eat anything by mouth. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the menu for the lunch meal on 11/16/22 revealed the menu included: egg salad sandwich, macaroni salad, cucumber salad, a cookie, and milk. Interview on 11/16/22 at 10:43 A.M. with [NAME] #301 revealed the menu was changed since the cucumber salad was not delivered. The interview revealed the substitution would be potato salad. Interview on 11/16/22 at 10:54 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #401 confirmed potato salad was not an appropriate nutritional substitute for cucumber salad due to the high carbohydrate content. Observation of the lunch meal tray service on 11/16/22 at 11:47 A.M. revealed the foods served included an egg salad sandwich, macaroni salad,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and dated properly. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #30) who did not eat anything by mouth. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) #401 revealed the following items were improperly stored and were not dated: In the freezer: A bag of frozen chicken breasts which was opened and was not dated. A bag of frozen hash brown patties which was opened and was not dated. A frozen bag of green beans which was opened and was not dated. In the refrigerator: A half-full bottle of Garlic Parmesan wing sauce which was not dated. A half-full tub of Sweet & Sour sauce which was not dated. A half-full tub of Gourmet Sweet Relish which was not dated. A quarter-full bottle of mustard which was not dated. A quarter-full tub of Mayonnaise which was not dated. Interview on 11/14/22 at 1:40 P.M. with DM #401 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, family and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to include residents in the care planning process. This affected five ( #22, #24, #28, #38 and #117) of five reviewed for care planning. The total facility census was 66 Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/15/19, with diagnoses of dysphagia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, weakness, diabetes type two, anoxic brain damage, spastic hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, depression, anxiety and contracture right elbow. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was coded to have both short and long term memory problems. Resident #22 had no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors during the review period. Resident #22 was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, required extensive assist with dressing and personal hygiene, and was supervision with eating. Resident received seven days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents resided in a safe, sanitary and homelike environment when there was wallpaper missing on the walls of a resident room affecting two (#59 and #24) and the facility failed to repair a hole in the back hallway floor, that was utilized by residents this had the potential to affect the 52 residents the facility identified as not being bedfast. The total facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility and the resident was moved into his current room on 05/27/22 and has remained in the current room since 05/27/22. Observations on 11/14/22 at 1:10 P.M., of Resident #59's room revealed the wall paper border in the room was torn and missing in large pieces around 75 percent of the room. Interview on 11/14/22 at 1:10 P.M., with Resident #59 stated the wallpaper has been that way since he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed rail was installed as ordered to assist with bed mobility. The deficient practice affected one (#61) of one record reviewed for accommodations of needs. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed and original admission date on 07/13/22 and a re-admission date on 09/20/22. Medical diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anxiety disorder, obesity, and personal history of stroke. Review of the physician orders dated November 2022 revealed Resident #61 had the following order: attach bed rails to bed approved by hospice dated 10/21/22. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #61 required total dependence on two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriately completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN). This affected one (#61) of the three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. The facility census was 66. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 07/13/22 with an re-entry date of 09/20/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, transient ischemic attach, and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #61 was noted to reject care 1 to 3 days a week. Required total dependence from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, extensive assistance from two staff members for dressing, personal hygiene, supervision with set up help for eating. No noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure residents received accurate bed hold notices/reserve bed payment information and establish a written bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy. This affected two (#35 and #44) of the three residents reviewed for bed hold notices/ reserve bed payment. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #35 revealed an initial admission date of 08/12/22 and a re-entry date of 11/08/22. Diagnosis included heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed in the resident's admission Paperwork dated 08/12/22, documented the resident had indicated that she would like the facility to hold her bed at the facility when transferred to the hospital, visits with friends or family, or any other leaves of absences. Review of progress note dated 11/02/22 at 5:20 P.M., created by Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected resident's condition. This affected two (#59 and #65) of 22 resident assessments reviewed. The total facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/17/22, with diagnoses including: schizophrenia, insomnia, and weakness. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/14/22, revealed the resident is cognitively intact, had no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors. The assessment had the resident coded as receiving seven days of antibiotics during the assessment look back period. Review of Resident #59's medication administration record (MAR) for October 2022 revealed the resident had no antibiotics used in his care during the entire month of October 2022. Review of physician orders revealed there were no orders for the resident to receive antibiotics during the month of October 2022.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to completed an updated PASARR screening when a Resident was diagnosed with a new mental illness. This affected one (#36) of the three residents reviewed for accurate PASARR screenings. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 11/01/17 with a re-entry date of 11/08/19. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder identified on 04/06/21, major depressive disorder identified on 06/03/20, psychosis, and psychoactive substance dependence. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident with a modified independence for daily cognitive decision making abilities. No behaviors noted with this assessment review. Resident #36 noted to receive antidepressants and opioids 7 days a week. No antipsychotics were received. Review of plan of care dated 11/13/17 revealed Resident #36 uses antidepressant medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a full resident review for a resident who enter the facility under the hospital exemption and remained in the facility longer than 30 days. This affected one (#59) of two residents reviewed for preadmission screening. The total facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses including schizophrenia, insomnia, and weakness. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment completed on [DATE], revealed the resident is cognitively intact, had no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors during the review period. The assessment had the resident coded with the diagnosis of schizophrenia. The resident received seven days of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antibiotic medication and four days of opioid medication. Review of the resident medical record revealed the resident had a hospital exemption review completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had comprehensive care plans developed to addressed their individualized needs. This affected four ( #49, #59, and #38) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The total facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/30/22, with diagnoses including myocardial infarction, tracheostomy status, and type two diabetes. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have a mental status change. The resident was coded as having a tracheostomy tube. Review of Resident #49's care plan revealed a care plan was in place related to the resident having a tracheostomy and the risk and complications of respiratory distress related to the tracheostomy tube. The care plan was silent to the type and size of tracheostomy tube the resident utilized and to what steps to take in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to timely address a resident's constipation. This affected one (#117) of one reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #117's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/27/22, from another skilled nursing facility to be closer to family. Resident #117's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes, obesity, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, anxiety and depression. Review of most recent admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, resident was assessed as dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. Resident was assessed as always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of current monthly physician orders revealed orders for Miralax 17 grams daily, and an ordered Bisacodyl 10 milligram (mg), one suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation. Interview on 11/14/22 at 1:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, family and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure vision services were arranged and received timely. The deficient practice affected two (#28 and #38) of two residents reviewed for communication and sensory services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/14/21. Diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of breast, malignant neoplasm of right kidney, edema of left orbit, cognitive communication deficit and unspecified dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #38 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from one staff to complete personal hygiene task and supervision with set up help only to one staff to complete other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the optometry consent form dated 05/25/21 revealed Resident #38 consented to receive optometrist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation of wound care, resident and staff interview, and review of hospice notes, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) guidelines review, the facility failed to identify a new pressure area, assess the wounds, and provides treatments. The deficient practice affected one (#61) of one reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an original admission date on 07/13/22 and a re-admission date on 09/20/22. Medical diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anxiety disorder, obesity, and personal history of stroke. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #61 required total dependence on two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident #61 had one unstageable deep tissue injury noted on the assessment with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, family and staff interviews, and review of therapy notes, the facility failed to ensure a resting hand splint was applied as ordered. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date on 04/19/22. Medical diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, contracture of left hand, cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed Resident #5 had an order, dated 10/26/22, for occupational therapy (OT) to issue a left handed resting hand splint for patient to wear up to eight hours a day as well as skin checks after removing the splint. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed Resident #5 had an order, dated 02/23/22, for Resident #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure emergency tracheostomy supplies were readily available. This affected one (#49) of two residents reviewed for tracheostomy services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to myocardial infarction, tracheostomy status, and type two diabetes. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/13/22, revealed Resident #49 was coded as having a tracheostomy tube. Review of Resident #49's physician orders revealed there was no order to address what to do with the tracheostomy tube in an emergency, or what type or size of tracheostomy tube Resident #49 utilized in her care. Review of Resident #49's care plan revealed a care plan was in place related to the resident having a tracheostomy and the risk and complications of respiratory distress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide psychiatric services and/or alcohol counseling services as care planned for a resident with substance seeking behavior. This affected one (Resident #58) out of the one resident reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 03/11/22. Diagnoses included hypertension, difficulty in walking, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #58's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/29/22, revealed Resident #58 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the plan of care, dated 08/09/22, revealed Resident #58 did not conform to or understand boundaries of socially accepted behaviors. Resident #58 was verbally abusive towards staff and used profanity with staff and residents. Resident #58 had the potential for continued behaviors. Interventions included to discuss with the resident in a straight forward, but kind manner, that his/her behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor residents who received psychotropic medications. This affected one (#59) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to schizophrenia, insomnia, and weakness. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, completed on 10/14/22, revealed Resident #59 was cognitively intact, had no delusions, no hallucinations and no behaviors during the review period. Resident #59 was coded as having received seven days of antipsychotic and antidepressant during the review period. Review of Resident #59's physician orders revealed Resident #59 had orders for Remeron (antidepressant) 7.5 mg daily for depression, Trazodone (antidepressant) 100 mg daily for insomnia, and Haloperidol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to perform laboratory tests as ordered. This affected one (#22) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes type two, anoxic brain damage, and spastic hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side. Review of Resident #22's physician orders revealed Resident #22 had an order for a Hemoglobin A1C (lab test that measures average blood glucose over the past three months) level. Additionally, Resident #22 had an order for a Depakote level every six months. Review of Resident #22's laboratory test results revealed Resident #22 had a Depakote level obtained on 03/09/22, and there was no evidence a Hemoglobain A1C level was obtained. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 11/17/22 at 1:44 P.M. confirmed the facility did not complete laboratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, family and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services. This affected one (#22) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dysphagia, anoxic brain damage, spastic hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was not in a persistent vegetative state, had unclear speech, was usually able to express ideas and wants, and understands others verbal content. Resident #22 was coded to have both short and long term memory problems. Review of Resident #22's Dental Summary Report dated 03/11/22 revealed Resident #22 was seen on this day by the dentist and had several maxillary teeth which were decayed and according to the resident caused pain when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice to one Resident (#66) of three reviewed for transfers and discharges. The facility census was 69. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right below the knee amputation, end stage renal disease with dialysis, and diabetes. Review of the progress note dated 12/13/19 revealed Resident #66 complained of flank pain on the right side and increasing pain in the right lower leg stump. Resident #66 wanted to go to the emergency department (ED). The resident's physician and representative were notified, and the resident was sent to the hospital. Resident #66 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence the resident received a written bed hold policy notice. Interview on 03/12/20 at 12:53 P.M. with the Regional Director of Clinical Services #92 verified the facility did not provide a bed hold policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected two Residents (#37 and #57) of 17 reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 69. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hydrocephalus, dysphagia, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #37's physician's order dated 12/03/19 revealed the resident was ordered Lantus (insulin), 10 units, two times each day for diabetes. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not receiving insulin. Interview on 03/12/20 at 8:51 A.M., with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator #59 verified Resident #37 was receiving insulin during the MDS look back period and an error had been made when coding the MDS. 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with extreme cognitive deficits, schizophrenia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing. This affected one Resident (#7) of one reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 08/10/19 with diagnoses including dementia, spinal enthesophathy, diabetes, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Further review of the record revealed the resident was admitted with three pressure ulcers as follows: 1. A stage four (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible on some parts of the wound bed. Epibole (rolled edges), undermining and/or tunneling often occur) on the coccyx measuring 6.0 centimeters (cm) long by 6.8 cm wide by 0.8 cm deep with tunneling. 2. An unstageable (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to date insulin pens when they were opened. This affected three Residents (#37, #56, and #67) of seven insulin pens observed. The facility census was 69. Findings include Observation on 03/12/20 at 6:30 A.M. revealed three insulin pens were identified as being open and used for Resident #37, #56, and #67. None of the tree pens had an open date identified on the pens. Interview on 03/12/20 at 6:30 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #93 verified the insulin pens for Residents #37, #67, and Resident #56 did not indicated the date the pens were opened. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, dated 01/1/14, under the heading of Multi-Dose Vials, revealed vials must be dated upon opening and discarded within 30 days unless otherwise specified by manufacturer.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to assist a resident with obtaining dental services. This affected (#35) of three reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, hemiplegia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #35's plan of care revealed the resident had natural teeth and was at risk for oral issues related to obvious broken natural teeth. An intervention was to coordinate arrangements for dental care and transportation as needed. Review of Resident #35's nurse progress noted dated 03/26/19 at 3:05 P.M. revealed Resident #35 had returned from a dental appointment and had six lower teeth removed. Review of the nurse progress note dated 04/13/19 at 1:38 P.M. revealed the resident had teeth extracted recently and was scheduled for remaining teeth to be extracted. Review of Resident #35's annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-09 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of discharge to two residents when they transferred to the hospital. This affected two residents (#13, #87) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization with the potential to affect all 73 residents as facility does not have a process in place for discharge or transfer notices. The facility census was 73. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, anemia, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of a nursing note dated 12/19/23 at 10:05 A.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #114 revealed Resident #13 was seen by the facility nurse practitioner due to refusal to eat and edema to upper and lower extremities. The provider gave an order for Resident #13 to be sent to the hospital for evaluation. Resident #13's responsible party was notified by phone of the transfer. Review of Resident #13's record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-09 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to offer bed hold notices to two residents. This affected two residents (#13, #87) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization with the potential to affect all 73 residents as the facility does not have a process in place for bed hold notices. The facility census was 73. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, anemia, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of a nursing note dated 12/19/23 at 10:05 A.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #114 revealed Resident #13 was seen by the facility nurse practitioner due to refusal to eat and edema to upper and lower extremities. The provider gave an order for Resident #13 to be sent to the hospital for evaluation. Resident #13's responsible party was notified by phone of the transfer. Review of Resident #13's record revealed no written notice of transfer or discharge. 2. Record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-22 · tag F0572 — widespread
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to have the resident rights posted in the facility. This had the potential to affect 66 of 66 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the facility during the survey on days of 10/14/22, 10/15/22, 10/16/22, 10/17/22 and 10/21/22 revealed there were no postings of resident rights available for residents, in the facility. Interview on 10/21/22 at 9:35 A.M., with the Social Service Designee (SSD) #346 revealed there is a paper copy of the resident rights outside her office door on the main hallway. The SSD #346 went to the file holder which was approximately five feet off the floor and was a plastic file holder with multiple file folders in the holder. The SSD #346 was observed to remove a piece of paper from behind all of the file folders which listed the resident rights. The location of the paper being behind the other file folders prohibited the paper from being seen by looking at the file holder on the wall. When asked how a resident would know the paper with the resident rights was located behind…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-11-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on activity calendar reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meaningful activities were offered to residents daily and at various times throughout the day. The deficient practice affected had the potential to affect 66 of 66 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 66. Findings Include: Review of activity calendars dated from August 2022 through November 2022 revealed no activities were scheduled on the weekends in November 2022 and no activities were scheduled after 2:00 P.M. in the afternoon, there were not any evening activities offered. Interview on 11/16/22 at 1:30 P.M., with Activity Director (AD) #300 revealed she was the only activities staff person at the facility currently due to the activities aide quitting. AD #300 stated she worked Mondays through Friday until 5:00 P.M. AD #300 confirmed the last activity daily was scheduled at 2:00 P.M. and there were not any activities scheduled in the evenings due to not having any activities staff to run the activity. AD #300 stated she handed the activity calendars out to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$151,356 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $59,948 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
  • $91,408 — penalty dated 2024-10-01
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-11 for 16 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2020
AARON HANDLER FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2020
AH DYNASTY LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
GEORGE S. REPCHICK 2020 FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2020
GSR DYNASTY LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2020
HANDLER, AARONIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2020
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2020
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2025
RATNARAJAH, GOKULANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
ROHR, CASANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$372K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 1%Other / private 71%

This home reported $372K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,655per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$346per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365673. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next