No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Embassy Of Wyoming Valley

50 N. Pennsylvania Ave., Wilkes Barre, PA 18701 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (570) 825-3488 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)1 actual-harm citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$20,496 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,496 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-03)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 N Main St · (570) 824-8921 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.2 mi
33 Public Sq · (570) 829-3568 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
33 · (570) 846-0123 · Call to confirm hours
Park
57 N Franklin St · (570) 825-5763 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
17 S Pennsylvania Ave · (570) 824-8741

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.5%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.5%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.8%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.8%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.8%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.2%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission5.1%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.991.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.501.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.8%CMS range 26.0–53.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.1–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.3–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
42.4%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 91.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, investigative documentation provided by the facility, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) from neglect by not implementing the individualized care plan intervention of a mechanical lift for all transfers, resulting in actual harm in the form of a spiral fracture of the left tibia. This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility on February 19, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect. The policy defines neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select investigative reports, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing care with assistance of two-persons as planned to ensure safety and prevent major injuries, fractures to the left distal femur and right distal tibial, for one resident, Resident 2, out of eight sampled residents for abuse prohibition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation that last revised by the facility on January 1, 2024, defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The facility would deploy trained and qualified registered, licensed, and certified staff on each shift and assure that the staff assigned have knowledge of the individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a significant change in condition, specifically a fall with a head injury, and the resulting physician-ordered treatment, for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Management Policy, dated January 24, 2026, revealed it is the facility's policy that following a resident fall, the resident's responsible party will be notified.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disorder of the brain that causes memory loss, impaired thinking, and changes in behavior that begin later in life). A review of Resident 1's (quarterly) Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 11, 2026, revealed that Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, Treatment Administration Records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure licensed nursing staff administered a physician-ordered wound treatment as prescribed for one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation last reviewed on January 24, 2026, revealed that all services provided (including medications and treatments) shall be documented in the medical record. The guidelines indicated that documentation of procedures and treatments will include the date and time the treatment was provided, the name and title of the individual providing the care and completing the documentation of care. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a disease that causes progressive memory loss and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete clinical record for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Fall Prevention and Management Policy, dated January 24, 2026, indicated in the event of a fall, details of the fall will be gathered and documentation completed as indicated. The procedure guidelines included: update the fall assessment, conduct neurological checks (evaluations to identify any hidden brain injuries or issues after someone hits their head) if the resident is observed to hit one's head, and complete post fall documentation for 72 hours. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a progressive condition that causes memory loss and impaired thinking). A review of Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, it was determined the facility did not provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents on three of three floors observed.Findings include:An observation conducted on March 12, 2026, at 9:15 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the floor contained visible dust, food particles, debris, and dirt located under and around the resident's bed, including the area near the window and between beds. Red-colored liquid droplets were observed dispersed across the floor surface. The flooring along the perimeter walls appeared discolored. The baseboards were observed to be detached and falling away from the wall, exposing unpainted wall surfaces beneath. An observation conducted on March 12, 2026, at 9:20 AM throughout the third-floor hallways revealed multiple stains on the floors. Debris was observed throughout the hallways, including crushed food particles, straw wrappers, and empty sugar packets. Splatters of a white liquid substance were observed on the hallway floors. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, prior survey findings, the facility's Plan of Correction (POC), and observations made during the revisit survey, it was determined the facility failed to implement and sustain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified, monitored, and corrected ongoing deficient practice related to environmental cleanliness and maintenance.Findings included:Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), which is a systematic and ongoing process used by a facility to identify problems, implement corrective actions, and ensure those actions are effective and sustained over time, was reviewed. A review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed the facility will develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on outcomes of care and quality of life. The facilities' QAPI program shall address all systems of care and management practices, include clinical care, quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility dietary schedules, menus, and dietary records, it was determined the facility failed to consistently maintain sufficient dietary staff to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services department. This failure resulted in meals not being consistently served at palatable temperatures, the planned menu not being followed, and the food and nutrition services department not being maintained in a sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of the facility census revealed that on January 27, 2026, the facility census was 93 residents. Resident interviews conducted during the survey, which began on January 27, 2026, and concluded on January 30, 2026, revealed multiple concerns regarding the palatability of meals (the acceptability of food based on taste, texture, smell, and serving temperature). An interview with Resident 12 on January 27, 2026, at 12:00 PM revealed the resident reported food was frequently served cold and was not palatable. An interview with Resident 26 on January 27, 2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of foodborne illness in the food and nutrition services department and failed to ensure that food storage in personal refrigerators was adequately monitored and maintained within safe temperatures to prevent foodborne illness for one resident with a personal refrigerator (Resident 5).Findings include:Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of documentation provided by the facility, select policies, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program, identify potential factors related to the prevalence of urinary tract infections, and implement interventions based on these factors to decrease the occurrence and further failed to ensure compliance with facility policy to reduce the spread of infection was consistently implemented, including observations made on one out of two nursing units (Second Floor Nursing Unit).Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth and Spread in Buildings, September 30, 2025, Legionnaires' disease is a serious type of pneumonia caused by bacteria called Legionella that live in water. People can get sick when they inhale water containing Legionella from building water systems or devices that are not adequately maintained. A water management program should identify areas or devices in a building where Legionella…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were accessible to reasonably accommodate a resident's need for assistance for three out of 23 residents sampled (Residents 3, 29, 7, and 63).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, indicated that all staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light. With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured as needed. Observation on January 27, 2026, at 11:43 AM revealed two staff members exiting Resident 3's room after providing care. Resident 3 was awake and lying in bed. The call bell was observed on the floor under the bed and was not within the resident's sight or reach. Review of Resident 3's care plan dated June 24, 2021, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents, including concerns expressed by six out of six residents during a resident group interview (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94) and four out of 23 sampled residents (Residents 9, 14, 20, and 52).Findings include: An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:07 PM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed dust, food pieces, debris, and dirt on the floor and under the window-side resident bed. An observation on January 27, 2026, at 12:09 PM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed water discoloration stains and pooling near the door side bed. Food pieces and dirt were observed under the door-side bed. The resident toilet was observed with brown stains and discolorations on the seat. The toilet dispenser roll was observed with a 2-inch gap between the metal dispenser and the wall, exposing the inside of the wall. [NAME] debris from the wall was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the required information and resources were made available to residents for filing grievances with the facility and for filing grievances with independent entities, including six out of six residents interviewed during a resident group meeting (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94).Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Resident and Family Concerns, last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Notices of resident's rights regarding grievances will be posted in prominent locations throughout the facility. Information on how to file a grievance or complaint will be available to the resident. A review of the facility policy titled Resident and Family Concerns revealed the facility failed to include the following required information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents, including experiences expressed by 1 out of the 23 sampled residents (Resident 50) and as expressed by residents during a resident group interview (Residents 46, 56, 71, 77, 83, and 94)Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A care plan initiated May 1, 2024, identified Resident 50 as having a chronic decline in intellectual functioning related to dementia. Interventions included encouraging small group activities. During an interview on January 27, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of personnel records, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for one of one activities personnel files reviewed (Employee 1).Findings include: Review of facility documentation revealed the job description for Activity Director stated the primary purpose of the job position is to plan, organize, develop, direct and implement the overall operation of the Activity Department in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that an on-going program of activities is designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Continued review of the job description revealed the Activity Director is required to meet one of the following qualifications: be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of manufacturer storage guidelines, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were properly stored and that expired or improperly labeled medications were removed from use. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain required refrigeration temperatures for injectable medications used to manage blood sugar levels and failed to discard expired or improperly labeled medications, affecting 11 residents medications in two of two medication rooms observed. (Residents 5, 9, 10, 25, 42, 66, 72, 78, 85, 92, and 94).Findings include: A review of manufacturer storage guidelines for injectable blood glucose-lowering medications, including Glargine, Humalog, Trulicity, Lantus, Novolog, and Lispro (injectable medications used to treat diabetes by lowering blood sugar levels), revealed that these medications require refrigerated storage at temperatures between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit to maintain medication stability and effectiveness. Manufacturer guidance further specifies that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of select facility policies, test tray evaluation, review of facility-provided documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were served at safe and palatable temperatures for four of 23 residents sampled (Residents 12, 26, 30, and 1).Findings included: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements, the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. Review of the facility Safe Food Handling Practices Policy last reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that hot food must be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher and cold foods must be held at 41 degrees or lower. During an observation of the dietary department on January 26, 2026, at 10:00 AM, the facility's dishwasher was observed to be inoperable. During an interview at that time, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated the dishwasher…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility-provided documentation, and employee interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of resident medical records for one of 3 closed records (Resident 98). Findings include:Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and subsequently transferred to the emergency department on November 28, 2025. Following a fall on November 25, 2025, neurological check assessments (routine monitoring for signs and symptoms of head or brain injury) were initiated for Resident 98. Review of these neurological assessments revealed a total of 21 assessments were documented as completed. However, the electronic clinical record indicated the neurological assessment documentation was not finalized or locked until January 7, 2026. A lock date represents the point at which documentation is finalized and made read-only to prevent further alteration. Further review revealed that 13 of the 21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, prior survey findings, the facility's Plan of Correction (POC), and observations made during the revisit survey, it was determined the facility failed to implement and sustain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified, monitored, and corrected ongoing deficient practice related to environmental cleanliness and maintenance.Findings included:Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), which is a systematic and ongoing process used by a facility to identify problems, implement corrective actions, and ensure those actions are effective and sustained over time, was reviewed. A review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed the facility will develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on outcomes of care and quality of life. The facilities' QAPI program shall address all systems of care and management practices, include clinical care, quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility-provided documentation, and interviews with staff and the resident representative, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident representative was fully informed, in advance and in sufficient detail, by the physician or other practitioner, of the resident's condition, the risks and benefits of proposed treatment, and available treatment alternatives, in order to make an informed decision regarding care. This failure occurred for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident 98).Findings include:According to the National Institute of Health (NIH) and National Library of Medicine, Informed Consent is defined as the cornerstone of medicine, ensuring ethical treatment decisions and patient-centered care. Patients have the right to make informed and voluntary treatment decisions. Informed consent is more than merely a signature on a document; it is a communication process between the clinician and the patient. This process ensures that the patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders accurately reflected a the resident's documented resuscitation status for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 73).Findings include:A review of a facility policy titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives, last reviewed by the facility on [DATE], revealed it is the facility policy to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate and advance directive. An advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include malignant neoplasm of the right breast (breast cancer) and vascular dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and a staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that a significant change MDS assessment is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program. The assessment reference date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same as or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). A significant change MDS assessment must be performed regardless of whether an assessment was recently conducted on the resident. A clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, select policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 5).Findings include: A review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that when administering medications to a resident, staff are to observe consumption of the medication. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a current diagnosis of diabetes (a chronic condition causing high blood sugar because the body cannot produce enough hormone to lower the levels to a normal range), chronic pain, and iron deficiency (low iron levels in the blood). A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) completed on October 28, 2025, revealed the resident had a BIMS of 3 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement individualized, person-centered interventions to manage dementia-related behavioral symptoms in order to promote resident safety and to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident out of 23 residents sampled (Resident 7).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Dementia Care last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, indicated the facility will provide appropriate treatment and services to every resident who displays signs of, or is diagnosed with dementia, to meet his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility will assess, develop, and implement care plans through an interdisciplinary team (IDT) approach. The care plan interventions will be related to each resident's individual symptomology and rate of dementia progression with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the provision of adaptive dining equipment as prescribed to support safe eating for one of 23 sampled residents. (Resident 16)Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy (group of permanent movement, muscle tone, or posture disorders caused by abnormal brain development or damage before, during, or shortly after birth) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated November 2, 2025, indicated that a BIMS interview (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool to assess cognition) should not be completed with the resident due to the resident being rarely or never understood, had short term and long term memory problem, was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of the facility admission agreement and arbitration documents, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements were implemented to ensure that an arbitration agreement allowed for the mutual selection of a neutral arbitrator for one resident out of three discharged residents reviewed. (Resident 98). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 13, 2025, revealed that Resident 98 is severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 02 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a score of 00 to 07 indicates cognition is severely impaired).A clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's abuse policy, clinical records, investigation reports, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that one resident (Resident 1) out of six sampled residents was free from sexual abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 2).Findings included:A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility on February 19, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed admission to the facility May 20, 2025, with diagnoses to include dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and a review of employee qualifications it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21, Professional and Vocational Standards: Responsibilities of the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist Section 21.711 Professional Conduct indicated that the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist shall provide information which will enable patients to make their own informed decisions regarding nutrition and dietetic therapy, including the reasonable expectations of the professional relationship. During initial tour of the food and nutrition services department on March 11, 2025, at 6:20 PM the food and nutrition services director (FSD) stated that he had been the FSD since January 21, 2025. The FSD stated that he had a culinary background but did not yet have a certification to meet the requirements for a qualified foodservice director based on current federal regulation. The FSD stated that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on two of two resident floors (second floor and third floor residential units, and third floor shower room). Findings included: An observation on March 11, 2025, at 8:38 PM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed numerous spackled areas on the wall throughout the room. The closet door was missing. Interview with Resident 39, at the time of the observation, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He reported the walls have been unfinished since his admission to the facility. He continued, they've been promising me a closet door since I got here, but as you see, that hasn't happened. An observation on March 11, 2025, at 8:50 PM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a large, gouged area of the wall outside the bathroom and an unknown red substance splattered on the ceiling above the resident's bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the evaluation of a resident's need and use of physical restraints, including evaluation of the least restrictive measure needed to treat the resident's medical symptom, and failed to obtain informed consent prior to the use of the physical restraint for one of one sampled resident with restraints (Resident 1). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Restraint Free Environment last reviewed by the facility February 19, 2025, revealed that physical restraint refers to any method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Physical restraints may include but are not limited to: Applying leg or arm restraints, hand mitts, soft ties, or vests that the resident cannot remove. Using devices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to follow a physician order to discontinue a treatment for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 57). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide person-centered care by not ensuring compliance with physician orders for the management of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line, failed to maintain the availability of prescribed emergency supplies, and failed to meet the resident's clinical needs for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 31). Findings include: A review of clinical records revealed Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include lobar pneumonia (type of lung infections that affects an entire lobe of the lung), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome of non-infectious origin (widespread inflammatory response to a non-infectious trigger). A review of Resident 31's hospital records, including the PICC Insertion Documentation dated January 30, 2025, indicated the resident underwent placement of a single-lumen PICC line (a peripherally inserted central catheter, also called a PICC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier infection control procedures for one out of 21 residents sampled (Resident 38), properly store clean towels designated for resident use in one out of two shower rooms on the Third Floor Nursing Unit, and maintain infection control practices related to reduce the potential for infections for one (Resident 36) out of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary Foley catheter (flexible tube which is placed in the bladder to drain urine). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed by the facility on February 19, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy to expand the use of personal protective equipment and refer to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provided opportunities for transfer of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staff hands and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered care for one resident out of one resident receiving hemodialysis. (Resident 87). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include end-stage kidney disease with dependence on kidney dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood). According to the clinical record, the resident had a left upper arm arteriovenous fistula (an AV fistula is a connection that's made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access. A surgical procedure, done in the operating room, is required to stitch together two vessels to create an AV fistula). Current physician orders dated January 30, 2025, indicated dialysis days and times (Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 11:30 AM), specific instructions for the left arm fistula, limb alert left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a process for providing pharmacy services, including access to emergency medications when not available onsite, and failed to maintain oversight of the facility's medication dispensing system. Findings include: A review of the facility Medication Ordering and Receipt Emergency Boxes and On-Site Stores Policy reviewed February 19, 2025, indicated the contract pharmacy supplies an On-site Stores (Pyxis like system, an automated, medication system, located in the facility) to be utilized by the facility in the case of new admissions, urgent new orders, received after-hours, or when immediate medication administration is required. Procedures to include, On-site Stores medication is secured in compliance with Federal, State, and Local regulations for drug storage and inaccessible to unauthorized persons. If the On-site Stores is not exchanged regularly, a pharmacy representative will perform an on-site audit inspection and remove expired drugs on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that drugs were stored at an acceptable temperature on two of two nursing units. Findings include: Review of the facility Medication Storage policy last reviewed February 19, 2025, indicated that medications and biologicals (medications that come from living organisms) are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees Fahrenheit and 46 degrees Fahrenheit are kept in a secured refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. An observation of the medication refrigerator located in the nurse's station on the Third Floor Nursing Unit on March 11, 2025, at 7:20 PM in the presence of employee 3 (registered nurse) revealed that various medications which required refrigerator were being stored in the refrigerator. The thermometer in the refrigerator read 50 degrees Fahrenheit. A second observation of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's automated emergency medication system, applicable state regulations, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State, and Local laws and professional standards by not ensuring pharmacy services necessary for daily pharmacy operations according to state requirements of Pa. Code title 49. Findings include: A review of Pennsylvania Code title 49, part I, subpart A, chapter 27 - STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, 49 Pa. Code § 27.204 - Automated medication systems revealed the following: (a) This section establishes standards applicable to licensed pharmacies that utilize automated medication systems which may be used to store, package, dispense or distribute prescriptions. (b) A pharmacy may use an automated medication system to fill prescriptions or medication orders provided that: (1) The pharmacist manager, or the pharmacist under contract with a long-term care facility responsible for the dispensing of medications if an automated medication system is utilized at a location which does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of the facility's planned cycle menus, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed follow written planned menus for four of seven residents sampled. (Resident 14, 55, 87, and 56). Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Menu Substitutions last reviewed by the facility January 2024, revealed that menu substitutions/changes shall be made to the planned menu in an emergency situation only and not for the convenience of the facility. At the time of the survey ending on January 30, 2025, the facility census was 86 residents. On January 30, 2025, at 9:50 AM resident 14 reported the menu changes occurred frequently, and staff only notified him when they are picking up his breakfast tray. He stated that they run out of food and blame the truck for not supplying food to the facility. Interview with Resident 14 on January 30, 2025, at 10:00 AM revealed that the always available menu is not consistently available- it's now changed to IF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of food committee minutes, resident and staff interviews, and test tray results, it was determined the facility failed to serve meals that were palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for four of the 7 residents sampled (Residents 1, 56, 14, and 87) Findings include: According to the federal regulatory guidance at 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. Review of the Resident Food Committee Meeting minutes dated December 11, 2024, revealed the residents were asked if the temperature of the hot/cold foods were appropriate. The response indicated was no, with the added comment: cold meals at dinner. Review of the Resident Food Committee Meeting minutes dated January 15, 2025, revealed the residents were asked if the temperature of the hot/cold foods were appropriate. The response indicated was no with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely follow-up with required dental services for one Medicaid payor source resident out of two residents sampled (Resident 49). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation (a condition that causes the heart to beat irregularly and sometimes much faster than normal), chronic kidney disease, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of an Annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to identify specific resident care needs) dated April 15, 2024, revealed that Resident 49 was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, which assesses cognition, a tool to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information, a score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment. Findings include: Observations on June 27, 2024, at approximately 8:55 AM of the second floor resident unit revealed the following: Dirt and debris was observed on the floors throughout the hallway. Floor molding was observed peeling off the wall in the hallway. A piece of the vinyl flooring was missing in the hall. Observation in the small resident dining room revealed dirt, debris and food particles on the floor. The floor was sticky next to the supply cabinet. Multiple dried brown spots were observed on the cabinet next to the refrigerator. Observation in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed large gouges in the wall. Food particles were observed on the floor. Spots of brown substance were observed on the closet doors. Observation in the bathroom of this resident room, revealed brown spots…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness, in the dietary department and the second- floor resident food storage area. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). The initial tour of the dietary department was conducted with the facility's food services manager on April 23, 2024, at 9:27 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and orderly environment on two of two resident care units. (Second and Third Floor) Findings include: Observations on April 24, 2024, at approximately 10:37 AM of the Unit 2 second floor revealed the following: An accummulation of dust and debris in a discolored ceiling vent in the Spa room. The tile directly under the sink on the left-hand side of the wall was chipped exposing plaster on the wall. The toilet to the left upon entrance to the room, was observed as you walk into this room was noted to have a brown substance with an odor of feces covering the seat and in the bowl. In the shower room bathroom, there was a large gap observed between the wall and sink, which extended the length of the sink. The sink appeared to be pulling away from the wall. The bases of the mechanical lifts that were stored in the shower room were heavily soiled with dirt and debris. One of the lifts had a white cream like substance on the handle. A soiled fall mat was observed inside the Jacuzzi tub…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice to ensure that licensed nurses properly evaluated and provided nursing care for a change in condition for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 52) and failed to follow physician orders for bowel protocol for two residents out of 20 sampled (Resident 40 and 15). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility planned menus and select facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were provided meals that accommodated food preferences for four of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 59, 66, 32, and 40). Findings Include: A review of a facility policy entitled Alternative Menu Program that was last reviewed by the facility on January 18, 2024, indicated that always available items must be posted by the menu on all floors for the residents to see and all items must be available for the meal. There are three menu items on the alternate menu that includes grilled cheese, hamburger on a bun, and a deli sandwich. Based on resident decisions from the facility's monthly Food Committee meeting, two selections per the resident's selection will be added to the permanent always available menu items. The two selections will be rotated monthly. A review of the facility's April 2024 events/activities handout that was provided to each resident listed that the monthly Always Available Menu for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards on one of two resident care units. (Second Floor) Findings include: An observation conducted on April 24, 2024, at approximately 10:42 AM, revealed a crash cart was in the resident area, the Sunshine Terrace on the second floor. The cart was unattended and not locked, and contained emergency equipment that included 24-gauge needles. Employee 1, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) confirmed the above observation at this time and removed the cart from the resident area. During an interview on April 26, 2024, at 1:46 PM with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the cart should have been locked to prevent resident access to potentially hazardous items. 28 Pa Code 211.12 (c)(d)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e) (2.1) Management

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies/reports and clinical records, and staff, and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care to promote the highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being of one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 52). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring last reviewed January 18, 2024, indicated that behavioral symptoms will be identified using facility-approved behavioral screening tolls and the comprehensive assessment. The nursing staff will identify, document and inform the physician about specific details regarding changes in an individual's mental status, behavior, and cognition including the onset, duration, intensity, and frequency of behavioral symptoms, any precipitating factors or relevant factors, appearance and alertness of the resident and related observations. New onset of changes in behavior will be documented regardless of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of manufacturer's directions for use, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adherence to pharmacy supplies expiration/use by dates on one of three resident units (Second Floor). Findings include: Observations on [DATE], at 9:00 AM of the facility's second floor medication room revealed the following: There were 62 needleless sterile (germ free) connectors that expired on the following dates: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. One sterile normal saline flush found on the floor under a table with an expiration date of [DATE]. 10 multifunction red sterile caps that expired on [DATE]. Two 27 Gauge x ½ inch precision BD glide needle that expired on [DATE]. Two sterile 16 French [NAME] Male Catheter that expired on [DATE]. 46 Assure TB Syringe 28 Gauge x ½ inch needles that expired on [DATE]. One sterile irrigation tray with piston syringe that expired on [DATE]. A ureteral self-catheterization kit that expired on [DATE]. Two RX…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to timely obtain radiology/diagnostic services to meet the needs of one resident of 20 sampled (Resident 52). Findings include: Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (a major neurocognitive disorder that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety and reduced mobility. A review of progress notes dated March 28, 2024, revealed that the certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) assessed the resident with a chief complaint of following up on a urinary tract infection (UTI) and left hand swollen. The resident had some tenderness but was able to move her hand, no bruising noted but the area was warm and red with good capillary refill. The resident denies any injury and was afebrile (without fever). Plan of care: give a dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility-initiated transfer notices and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for one resident out of the 21 residents sampled. (Resident 60). Findings include:: A review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD a progressive lung disease characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and airflow limitations). A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 60 was transferred to the hospital on June 28,2024 and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record failed to reveal documented evidence the facility provided the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman with a written notice of the facility-initiated transfer and reason for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-03-14 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide residents or their representatives with written information of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital of one resident out of 21 residents sampled (Residents 39). Findings include: A review of Resident 39's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on January 16,2025 and returned to the facility on January 21,2025. There was no documented evidence the facility provided this resident and/or their representatives written information about the facility's bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) at the time of transfer. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 13,2025 at 2:24 PM confirmed the facility was unable to provide documented evidence of the provision of a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon hospital transfer. 28 Pa Code 201.18 (b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(2)(3)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,496 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $11,386 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-07-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • AH DYNASTY LLC — private equity · 50.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • 2020 GSR DYNASTY LLC — private equity · 50.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AARON HANDLER REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/01/2024
GPH WILKES-BARRE II LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
NEILL, THOMASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
DAVIES, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
HANDLER, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
AARON HANDLER FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
AH DYNASTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
DRUMM MERGER COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
GEORGE S. REPCHICK 2020 FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
ANDREWS, HEATHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
FINN, NICHOLASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
LINAM, KIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025
RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 3%Other / private 4%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,570per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395456. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next