No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Embassy Of Saxonburg

223 Pittsburgh St, Saxonburg, PA 16056 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (724) 352-9445 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$339,073 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $339,073 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-19)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
333 W Main St · (724) 524-1270 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
115 Pittsburgh St · (724) 352-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
270 W Water St · (724) 524-1940 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Roebling Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.7%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.9%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.1%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.3%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.8%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.3%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%9.5%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
52.0%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 54.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

75 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical records, staff and resident representative interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a cognitive impairment resident (Resident R1) from non-consensual sexual contact by Closed Record Resident CR2 (Resident CR2) who had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors with Resident R1. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of 58 residents, when Resident CR2 was found exposing genitals to Resident R1, and Resident R1's hands were on Resident CR2's genitals. Findings Include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated [DATE], indicated that abuse can be identified as verbal, physical, mental, and sexual. The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation that achieves establishing a safe environment that supports, to the extent possible, a resident's consensual;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from mental and verbal abuse which caused a resident to experience severe psychosocial harm (embarrassment, humiliation) because of the abuse (Resident R1). This situation created an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of the facility provided policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property review date of 1/21/26, indicated This facility will not tolerate Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of its residents or the Misappropriation of Resident Property. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse includes deprivation by an individual, including caretaker of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy, employee files, facility documents, staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all staff had a criminal background check prior to working in the facility for one of seven staff members (Social Worker, Employee E1). The facility failed to identify incidents of abuse/neglect, and timely report and investigate allegations of abuse/neglect for one of six residents (Resident R1). The facility put other residents at risk for abuse/neglect from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Licensed Practical Nurse LPN), Employee E2, by allowing the staff members to continue to work after abuse/neglect occurred. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation.Findings include: Review of the facility provided policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property review date of 1/21/26, indicated This facility will not tolerate Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of its residents or the Misappropriation of Resident Property. Abuse is the willful…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from mental abuse and intimidation for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1), which resulted in psychosocial harm and mental anguish related to the reasonable person concept. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 2/19/25, revealed the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, and exploitation of its residents. The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, pain or mental anguish. This includes verbal abuse. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, employee file review, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to prohibit and prevent retaliation, as defined at section 1150B(d)(1) and (2) of the Social Security Act for five of fifteen staff members (Terminated Employees E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5) (Staff interviews to remain confidential).Findings Include: Review of the United States Social Security Act, Section 1150B indicated that:(d) Additional Penalties for Retaliation.-(1) In general.-A long-term care facility may not-(A) discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or deny a promotion or other employment-related benefit to an employee, or in any other manner discriminate against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of lawful acts done by the employee; or(B) file a complaint or a report against a nurse or other employee with the appropriate State professional disciplinary agency because of lawful acts done by the nurse or employee, for making a report, causing a report to be made, or for taking steps in furtherance of making a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for four of five residents (Resident R6, R16, R26, and R44).Findings include: The facility policy Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management dated 3/13/26, indicated the facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, unless clinically unavoidable, and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/22/26, included diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body, typically caused by spinal injury or disease), multiple sclerosis (a disease that affects central nervous system), and diabetes (a metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 16 of 20 residents interviewed and/or observed (R3, R4, R5, R6, R10. R16, R17, R26, R30, R32, R39, R46, R47, R48, R49, and R50).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Sufficient Nursing Staffing Policy dated 3/13/26, indicated it is the policy of this facility to maintain staffing practices that are consistent with federal regulations, state law, and professional standards of practice, while supporting safe and effective care. During an observation on 6/22/26, at 7:38 a.m. Resident R30's call light was observed to have been alarming for approximately ten minutes. At 7:39 a.m. a nurse aide walked by without looking into room to ensure resident safety. During an observation on 6/22/26, at 7:43 a.m. the Regional Director of Operations answered the call light. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the complete and timely administration of a prescribed medications for 48 of 59 residents (Resident R1 through R48).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration dated 3/13/26, indicated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so il this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Review of the Medication Admin Audit Report dated 6/11/26, indicated: Resident R1 had six medications ordered to be administered at 8:00 a.m., that were documented as administered at 3:32 p.m. Resident R2 had four medications ordered to be administered at 7:00 a.m. and two medications ordered to be administered at 8:00 a.m., that were documented as administered at 10:09 a.m. Resident R3 had two medications ordered to be administered at 7:00 a.m., that were documented as administered at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are completely and accurately documented.Findings Include:Review of the Medication Administration Audit Report for 6/11/26, indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E2 provided the following medications and treatments between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.-83 oral medications-2 topical medications-7 injected medications-1 intravenous medication-6 inhaled medications-4 ophthalmic medications-4 blood sugar assessments-8 nutritional supplements provided-1 tuberculosis test assessed-29 pain assessments-6 skilled nursing assessments-3 whole body skin assessments-2 vital sign assessments-1 weight assessment During an interview on 6/25/26, at 12:50 p.m. LPN Employee E1 confirmed she did not provide all of the medications and treatments. LPN Employee E2 stated LPN Employee E3 had also provided some of the medications and treatments. LPN Employee E2 stated that she was told by the former Director of Nursing to just…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's legal surrogate (power of attorney) was provided access to medical records for one of two residents (Resident R51).Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/10/25, included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (bladder problems due to disease or injury of the nervous system involved in the control of urination), anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue), and history of a stroke. Review of information submitted to the state survey agency on 6/12/26, indicated that a request for patient health information was submitted on 12/19/25. We reached out to the custodian on 12/31/2025. The custodian submitted incomplete records on 01/04/2026.From 01/21/2026 through 05/26/2026, we made multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed resident records, business office documents, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to convey funds credited to a resident's family for one of three closed resident records (Closed Resident Record CR3).Findings include: The facility Resident trust fund policy dated 1/16/26, indicated that the facility shall establish and maintain a system that ensure full, complete and separate accounting of each residents' account funds. Review of Closed Resident Record CR3's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Record CR3's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/21/25, indicated she had diagnoses upon admission that included lung cancer, diabetes (metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to glucose levels in the human body), and hyperlipidemia (elevated lipid levels within the blood). Review of Closed Resident Record CR3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse for two of three sampled resident records (Resident R1 and Closed Resident Record CR2).Findings include: Review of the facility provided policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 3/13/26, indicated that abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse includes deprivation by an individual, including caretaker of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. It includes verbal, physical or sexual abuse. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. The facility will have written procedures including reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation involving an allegation of resident abuse for two of three sampled resident records (Resident R1 and Closed Resident Record CR2).Findings include: Review of the facility provided policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 3/13/26, indicated that abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse includes deprivation by an individual, including caretaker of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. It includes verbal, physical or sexual abuse. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a job description, facility and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), and Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that residents were free from abuse and failed to make certain the facility implemented its abuse policies, creating an immediate jeopardy situation.Findings include: The job description for the NHA and DON specified the primary purpose of the job position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. Based on the findings in this report that identified that the facility failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that residents were free from abuse and failed to make certain the facility implemented its abuse policies, resulting an immediate jeopardy situation. The facility failed to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's job descriptions, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent services of a full-time Director of Nursing (40 or more hours a week) in the facility.Findings Include: Review of the facility provided Director of Nursing (DON) job description, signed and dated 12/22/25, indicated that the DON position purpose was, to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, stated, local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern the facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator and the Medical Director, to ensure the highest level of quality care is maintained at all times. Job duties include assist the designated Infection Control Coordinator, monitor the planning, conducting, and scheduling of timely in-service training classes, ensure that a sufficient number of licensed practical and/or registered nurses and nurse aides are scheduled and working during all shifts. Information reported to the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store, label and date food items in the Main kitchen which created the potential for food borne illness.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dating for Food Storage dated 3/16/26, and previously dated 1/21/26, indicated that when receiving foods from delivery, assure the foods are packaged with a shipping label. If the food item is removed from the original packaging/box from shipment, the item must have a date marked that it was received. In addition to labeling, dating items requires special attention. All foods that require time and temperature control should be labeled with the following: common name of food, date the food was made, use by date. If the food is not used within the days allowed to be held it must be discarded. Items that are being stored in the freezer must be labeled, dated, sealed in the same manner and may store for the period of time per guidelines. During a observation in the Main Kitchen in the walk-in freezer on 4/20/26, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, personnel records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for four of five nursing staff (Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E10, E11, E12, and E13).Findings include: Review of facility Employee Performance Evaluations policy dated 3/16/26, indicated all employees receive timely, fair, and consistent performance evaluations. After 90 days, performance evaluations are conducted annually. Review of NA Employee E10's personnel record indicated a hire date of 2/7/24. Last employee performance evaluation was dated 6/20/24. Review of NA Employee E11's personnel record indicated a hire date of 10/30/23. Last employee performance evaluation was dated 11/11/24. Review of NA Employee E12's personnel record indicated a hire date of 2/29/24. Last employee performance evaluation was dated 8/7/24. Review of NA Employee E13's personnel record indicated a hire date of 6/22/23. Last employee performance evaluation was dated 6/24/24. Review of personnel records did not include an annual performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a resident representative's concern, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents have the right to communication and access to persons and services inside the facility. for one of two residents (Resident R64).Findings include: Review of a Resident Representative concern dated 3/17/26, stated that a bill was received on behalf of her mother (Resident R64) who was a resident at the facility. The Resident Representative had questions, and concerns with her bill, and stated: I called them and they don't answer their phone. I went in and spoke to a young girl, and I told her the problem and gave her my name and phone number, and nobody ever got back to me. If this is a legitimate bill, then why can't they explain why we owe this amount? During an interview on 4/22/26, at 2:49 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that the Business Office Manager that would be able to explain the bill no longer worked at the facility, and that the NHA is now handling these concerns. However, the NHA was not made aware that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that residents or resident representatives were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R4 and R5).Findings include: Review of facility Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives policy dated 3/16/26, indicated that the facility will support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advance directives. On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive. The facility will provide the residents or resident representative information on formulating advanced directives.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of facility policy Notification of Changes dated 3/16/26, and previously dated 1/21/26, indicated that the facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. This may include a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial. condition such as deterioration in health, and a transfer or discharge of the resident from the facility. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/31/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that discharge documentation was on record for one of three closed resident records (Closed Resident Record R64).Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer and discharge date d 3/16/26, and previously dated 1/21/26, indicated that for transfer to another provider, for any reason, the following information must be provided to the receiving provider: contact information of the practitioner who is responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information, including contact information; advance directive information; and all other information necessary. Review of Closed Resident Record R64's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Record R64's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/24/25, indicated she had diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia (elevated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R1), and failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer and discharge date d 3/16/26, and previously dated 1/21/26, indicated that for transfer to another provider, for any reason, the following information must be provided to the receiving provider: contact information of the practitioner who is responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information, including contact information; advance directive information; and all other information necessary to meet the resident's needs. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the nutrition services provided met professional standards of quality for comprehensive care plan development for two of twelve months (March and April 2026).Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy Nutritional Management dated 3/1/26, and previously dated 1/21/26, indicated that monitoring of the resident's condition and care plan interventions will occur on an ongoing basis. Examples of monitoring include:Interviewing resident and/or resident representative to determine if their goals and preferences are being metDirectly observing the residentInterviewing the direct care staff to gain information about the resident, the interventions currently in place, what their responsibilities are for reporting on these interventions, and possible suggestions for changes if necessary During a telephonic interview on 4/22/26, at 12:46 p.m. Registered Dietitian (RD) Employee E7 confirmed that she has worked from home for the past two months, as she now works in Ohio and does not come…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, activity documentation, resident council group interview, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for one of three residents (Resident R15) and failed to have sufficient activity staff. Findings include: Review of facility policy Activity last reviewed 3/16/26, indicated the facility will provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preference. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident as well as support their physical, metal, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. During a review of the facility's April 2026 activity calendar the following was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards and provide safe bed mobility for one of two residents (Resident R32), and that the facility failed to ensure leg rests were applied to a resident's wheelchair prior to moving resident for one of two residents (Resident R53). Findings include: Review of facility policy Accidents and Supervision last reviewed 3/16/26, indicated the resident environment will remain free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Review of Resident R32's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R32's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/15/26, indicated she had diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a medical condition creating a sense of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of two residents (Residents R10). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Enteral Nutrition dated 3/1/26, and previously dated 1/21/26, indicated that the dietitian, with input from the physician, nurse, and resident/representative, will determine the calorie, protein, nutrient and fluid needs and evaluate whether the resident's current intake is adequate to meet those nutritional needs; identify the appropriate enteral nutrition to be administered and give direction regarding the need for additional fluids to be administrated. The physician will be involved in the decision regarding the use of enteral feeding, and document the reason for the decision. The dietitian is responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, staff interview, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of two residents (R14 and R44).Findings Include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 3/16/26, indicated oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the residents' goals and preferences. Change oxygen tubing weekly and as needed. Change humidifier bottles when empty. Keep delivery system in plastic bag when not in use. Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 3/16/26, indicated the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), respiratory failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to meet residents pain needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R7).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Pain Management dated 3/16/26, indicated the facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Based upon the evaluation, the facility in collaboration with the attending physician/prescriber, otherhealth care professionals and the resident and/or the resident's representative will develop, implement, monitor and revise as necessary interventions to prevent or manage each individual resident's pain beginning at admission. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of low back pain, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of two residents (Resident R43).Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care dated 6/3/1/26, and previously dated indicated that the facility will identify triggers which may re-traumatize residents with a history of trauma. Trigger-specific interventions will identify ways to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers which retraumatize the resident, as well as identify ways to mitigate or decrease the effect of the trigger on the residents, and will be added to the resident's care plan. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R43 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of care needs), dated 3/18/26, indicated diagnosis of PTSD (a mental health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate behavioral health management to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of four sampled residents (Resident R50).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Behavioral Health Services dated 3/16/26, indicated the facility will ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching and maintain their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. The facility will ensure the necessary behavioral health care services are person-centered and reflect the resident's goal for care, while maximizing the resident's dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization, independence, choice, and safety. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R50 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R50's care plan dated 3/6/23, indicated to monitor, document, and report as needed adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that the licensed pharmacist's medication regimen was reviewed and acted upon timely for one of five sampled residents (Resident R8).Findings include: The facility Medication reconciliation policy last reviewed on 3/16/26, indicated that monthly reconciliation processes included providing pharmacy consultation access to all medications areas and records for completion of pharmacy services activities. Respond to any medication irregularities reported by pharmacy consultant. Review of Resident R8's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R8's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/8/26, indicated he had diagnoses that included hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure), diabetes (metabolic disorder impacting organ function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies in one of one medication storage rooms (Main Storage Room), and failed to store one of six residents' medications securely (Resident R45). Findings: Review of facility Medication Storage policy dated [DATE], indicated that medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R45 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, urinary tract infection, and anxiety. Review of Resident R45's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R45's physician order dated [DATE], indicated to apply 1% Fungicure External Solution to fingernails topically two times a day for fungal for four weeks. During an observation on [DATE], at 10:07 a.m. Resident R45's bottle of Fungicure External…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent cross contamination and implement appropriate transmission-based precautions for one of three residents (Residents R3).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) last reviewed 3/16/26, indicated Enhanced Barrier precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with wounds. Gloves and gowns are made available immediately near or outside the resident's room. Review of the facility policy Clean Dressing Change last reviewed 3/16/26, indicated it is the facility policy to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross contamination. After removing existing dressing, remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for one of one of the facilities crash cart (a cart that contains supplies in the event of an emergency), (Main Nursing Unit).Findings include: During a review of facility provided documentation labeled Embassy of Saxonburg, indicated the emergency cart is to be checked by the night shift Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor daily. Check expiration dates and replace missed items. During a review of facility provided documentation labeled Embassy of Saxonburg revealed missing signatures on the following dates: [DATE] were missing [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] signatures.February 2026 were missing [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] signatures.[DATE] were missing [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] signatures. During an observation of the facilities crash cart, located at the Main Nurses Station, on [DATE], at 9:40 a.m. revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for six residents (Residents R2, R3, R9, R10, R11, and R12).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Sufficient Nursing Staffing Policy dated 1/15/26, indicated it is the policy of this facility to maintain staffing practices that are consistent with federal regulations, state law, and professional standards of practice, while supporting safe and effective care. During an interview on 3/12/26, at 10:01 a.m. Resident R2 indicated the facility is understaffed. We are not showered. reason given; they (staff) just don't do it. Yesterday resident went to the doctor's office and did not give shower prior to going, didn't have wound on buttocks dressed, letting resident sit on buttocks for day. Resident tries to get staff to get resident out of bed, they won't do it. Once resident is put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and review of employee files it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Food Service Director to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for three out of three months (January 2026 through March 2026).Findings include: During an interview on 3/12/26 at 9:57 a.m. Kitchen Manager, Employee E21 had been employed as the Kitchen Manager since she started at the facility on 1/28/26, and that she was not a Certified Dietary Manager. A review of Kitchen Manager, Employee E21 employee file revealed a hire date of 1/21/26. The Kitchen Manager was a Nurse Aide. During an interview on 7/21/24, at 1:40 p.m., the Interim Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Employee E12 and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that Kitchen Manger, Employee E21 met the qualifications for the position of Food Service Director. Pa Code: 201.18(e)(6) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a job description, facility and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that residents were free from abuse and failed to make certain the facility implemented its abuse policies, creating an immediate jeopardy situation.Findings include: The job description for the NHA specified the primary purpose of the job position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. Based on the findings in this report that identified that the facility failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that residents were free from abuse and failed to make certain the facility implemented its abuse policies, resulting an immediate jeopardy situation. The facility failed to provide fundamental principal that apply to treatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Facility Assessment. Findings include: A review of the Facility Assessment, dated 3/26/25 revealed the facility did not complete the template to indicate accurate information on:-In the section titled, List of Key Personnel were the previous Nursing Home Administrator, the previous Director of Nursing, and the previous Assistant Director of Nursing.-In the section titled Census indicated time period of 2025 year to date.-In the section titled Information about our residents has not been reviewed since 3/26/25. During an interview on 3/14/26, at approximately 1:00 p.m. the Interim Nursing Home Administrator Employee E12 confirmed that the facility failed to accurately complete the Facility Assessment and that all the information about our residents was from last time employee worked at facility.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2) Management.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to put forth a good faith effort to correct the deficient practice cited during the survey of 3/14/26, by failing to provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of the resident, providing qualifying coursework for the Dietary Manager, provide on sight oversight of daily dietary operations, training the Human Resources Director (Staff member responsible for hiring of qualified staff) to the qualifications of a Dietary Manager, hiring a qualified Dietary Manager to fill a vacant position, and making certain that the Facility Assessment documents are current and accurate as required. (Staffing, training, employment process, and Facility Assessment) Findings include: During an interview on 4/29/26 at 9:30 am the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility had failed to correct meeting the needs of the residents by failing to provide showers to the residents. A review of Resident Electronic Treatment Records (ETAR) for April 2026, confirmed that the facility failed to meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-14 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy,, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician completed the initial visits for three of four residents (Resident R5, R7, and R8).Findings include: Review of the facility's Physician Visits and Physician Delegation policy dated 6/1/24, last reviewed 1/21/26, indicated a physician assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), may not perform initial comprehensive visits. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and lung cancer. Review of Resident R5's late entry note entered on 3/1/26, effective 2/25/26, revealed an initial visit was completed by Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner, Employee E20 for the resident's admission. The facility failed to ensure a physician completed the initial visit. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately and timely document progress note in the clinical record for four of four residents (Residents R5, R6, R7, and R8).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and lung cancer. Review of Resident R5's late entry note entered on 3/1/26, effective 2/25/26, a total of four days later, revealed an initial visit was completed for the resident's admission. The facility failed to timely document in the resident's clinical record. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, tremor, and history of falling. Review of Resident R6's late entry note entered on 3/13/26, effective 3/5/26, a total of eight days later, revealed the resident was seen for a right shoulder injection. The facility failed to timely document in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-14 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility education documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for five of five staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E15, and Nurse Aides (NA) Employee E8, NA E16, NA E17 and, NA E18).Findings include: Review of facility provided employee listing of hires prior to 3/13/25, indicated the following employees were hired on the following dates:RN Employee E15 - hire date of 5/15/24.NA Employee E8 - hire date of 10/30/23.NA Employee E16 - hire date of 2/29/24.NA Employee E17 - hire date of 9/10/24.NA Employee E18 - hire date of 12/4/24. Review of facility provided documents and training records for RN Employee E15, and NA's Employee E8, NA E16, NA E17 and, NA E18, failed to include education on effective communication as required. Interview on 3/14/26, at 1:00 p.m. the Interim Nursing Home Administrator Employee E12 confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for five of five staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E15, and Nurse Aides (NA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of four residents (Resident R2).Findings include: Review of facility's policy, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management dated 1/8/25, last reviewed 1/21/26, indicated the facility is to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury. Interventions for preventions will be implemented for all residents who have ap reassure injury. Interventions will be documented in the care plan and communicated to all relevant staff. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses with abnormal posture, paraplegia, and a pressure ulcer of the right ankle. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's plan of correction, documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make a good faith effort to correct and sustain improvement for one of two citations issued for failure to provide the required number of Nurse Aides (NA) per resident per shift as required (Citation P5520).Findings include:A review of the facility's plan of correction revealed the following: Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) educated by Regional Director of Clinical Operations on 1.19.26 on required state Certified Nursing Assistant ratios. In an attempt to achieve appropriate staffing ratios the facility has implemented a daily assignment grid that designates the required Certified Nursing Assistant ratios to meet state requirements. Assignment grids will be reviewed during labor meetings no less than 3x a week for 3 weeks. When a call off is received the supervisor will make every effort to fully replace hours. In the event it cannot be covered, the Director of Nursing will be notified so Administrative staff can reach out to employees for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of five of six residents (Residents R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6).Findings include:Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 1/15/26, indicated care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care; transfer and ambulation; toileting; eating to include meals and snacks, and using speech, language or other functional communication systems. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of facility policy Activities dated 1/15/26, indicated it is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received neurological assessments after an incident involving a fall for one of five residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Fall Prevention and Management dated 1/15/26, indicated in the event of a fall, the resident will be assessed by a Licensed Nurse, the Physician/Nurse Practitioner and Responsible Party will be notified and an intervention(s) aimed to prevent further falls will be implemented. Details of the fall will be gathered and documentation completed as indicated.Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/20/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, seizure disorder, and hyponatremia (low levels of sodium in the blood). Review of a nursing progress note dated 1/18/26, stated, At…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have the responsible party sign financial papers for one of two residents ( Resident R2).Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Rights dated 2/19/25, indicated: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. Information about resident rights will be given to the resident understands to the extent possible, considering impediments which may be created by the resident's health and mental status. Review of Resident R2 was admitted [DATE]. Review of Resident R2 MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 8/28/25, indicated diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (is a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of the nerves) muscle wasting and atrophy (is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's legal surrogate (power of attorney) was utilized for legal action of non-payment of bills for one of two residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aids in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/22/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and anxiety (a feeling of worry,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of two residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 2/19/25, indicated that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, and exploitation of its residents. The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, pain or mental anguish. This includes verbal abuse. Facility staff should immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator. The Administrator or his/her designee will notify the Department of Health of the alleged violations involving Abuse, Neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of a resident, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided documents, clinical records, and staff interviews , it was determined that the facility failed to identify and investigate an incident of possible abuse for one of two incidents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 2/19/25, indicated that the facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, and exploitation of its residents. The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, pain or mental anguish. This includes verbal abuse. Facility staff should immediately report all such allegations to the Administrator. The Administrator or his/her designee will notify the Department of Health of the alleged violations involving Abuse, Neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified actives director from October 6, 2025. Findings include: Review of facility documentation: job description Activity Director: The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop, direct and implement the overall operation of the Activity Department in accordance with current, federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that an on-going program of activities is designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. During an interview on 11/13/25, at 10:30 a.m. Activity Director Employee E8 indicated her previous employment was as a Nurse Aide, and they did not have prior experience in an activity program. Review of Activity Director Employee E8 file failed to include documentation meeting federal standards. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's plan of correction, documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make a good faith effort to correct and sustain improvement for two of two citations issued for failure to provide the required number of Nurse Assistants (NA) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) per resident per shift as required ( Citations P 5520, and P5530). Findings include: A review of the facility's audit completed to measure improvement and compliance with the facility's plan of correction for citations P5520 and P5530 revealed that the facility was not meeting staffing ratios for the NA position. Each audit entry was documented as reviewed by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The audit failed to contain corrective action and measurable data for the continued deficient practice. Further review of the facility's audit revealed two forms that contained no audit information (blank) but were documented with the NHA's initials indicating review of the information by the NHA. During an interview on 1/7/26, at 2:30 pm the NHA indicated that she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for two of five rooms (C Hall and Shower Room). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Environmental Quality dated 2/19/25, indicated the policy of this facility is to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. On 8/12/25, at 10:01 a.m. observation of D hall floor included: - room [ROOM NUMBER] had two ceiling tiles that had brown stains on them.- During an interview on 8/12/25, at 10:22a.m. Anonymous Resident R1 stated, When I get a shower and move the towel under my feet, it is black. On 8/12/25, at 10:45 a.m. observation of Shower Room included: - Walls throughout the shower room had paint off in sections- Plaster repairs not painted- Shower 1 and Shower 2, on the left-hand side walking into shower room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and date food products, in the Main Kitchen. (Main Kitchen). Findings include: Review of facility policy Dating for Dry Food Storage, dated 2/19/5, indicated that when receiving foods from delivery, assure the foods are packaged with a shipping label. If the food item is a shelf stable item, and left in the original container/box it was shipped in with a dated label, it does not require additional label or dating. If a food item that is shelf stable is removed from the original packaging/box from shipment, the item must have a date marked that it was received. During an observation in the Main Kitchen on 6/2/25, at 9:15 a.m. the following was noted: · An opened bag of lettuce was in the tray line refrigerator with no label or date. · Two cans of tuna with no receive date in the dry storage area. · An open bag of garlic, and a bag of celery with no label or date in the walk-in refrigerator. · Two apple pies with no receive date in the walk-in freezer. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R28 and R61), failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of three resident hospital transfers (Residents R28, R41, and R61), and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman upon transfer to the hospital for three of three resident hospital transfers (Resident R28, R41, and R61). Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer and Discharge reviewed 2/19/25, indicated the facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of three residents (Resident R66). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions: Section A2105: Discharge Status: This item documents the location to which the resident is being discharged at the time of discharge. Select the two-digit code that corresponds to the resident's discharge status. Code 01, Home/Community: if the resident was discharged to a private home, apartment, board and care, assisted living facility, group home, transitional living, or adult foster care. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for two of eight sampled residents (Resident R39, and R61). Findings include: Review of Resident R39's admission record indicated resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event and may have triggers that can bring back memories of trauma accompanied by intense emotional and physical reactions), and encounter for other orthopedic aftercare. Review of Resident R39's quarterly MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/29/25, indicated that the diagnoses were current upon review. During an observation on 6/2/25, at 12:40 p.m. Resident R39 was observed with knee immobilizer braces on both legs. Review of Resident R39's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of three residents (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care, dated 2/19/25, indicated that the facility will identify triggers which may re-traumatize residents with a history of trauma. Trigger specific interventions will identify ways to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the resident, as well as identify ways to mitigate or decrease the effect of the trigger on the resident, and will be added to the resident's care plan. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/29/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Post Traumatic Stress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for three out of nine residents (Resident R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of the facility Activities of Daily Living last reviewed 2/19/25, indicated that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the facility policy Personal Care Procedure last reviewed 2/19/25, indicates the facility will provide/assist resident care and hygiene to each resident based on their individual status and needs. Bath/showers may be given at any time the resident chooses. They may be done in the morning, before bed or any other time of the resident's preference. Review of Resident R2's admission record indicated resident was admitted to facility on 1/15/24, with the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS- an autoimmune disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to notify a family representative of a change in condition for one of three residents. (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of the facility Change in Condition Notification Protocol reviewed 3/27/24, indicates the facility will inform the resident; consult with the residents physician; and if known notify the residents legal representative/and or resident representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status (i.e., a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications). A need to alter treatment significantly (i.e., a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment). A review of Resident R1's clinical record indicates an admission date of 11/21/2023, with the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD-narrowing of blood vessels), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings Include: A review of the facility Medication and Treatment Orders reviewed 3/27/24, indicated physician orders for medications and treatments will be consistent of safe and effective order writing. Treatment orders and follow up appointments will be documented in Point Click Care (PCC) and on the treatment administered record (TAR). A review of Resident R1's clinical record indicates an admission date of 11/21/2023, with the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD-narrowing of blood vessels), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). Review of Resident R1's physician orders revealed an order dated 4/9/24, indicated cbc-diff, cmp (bun, creatinine, lytes, ast, alt, t. billi, d. billi,Ibilli, alk phos) weekly for screening every Tuesday. Review of the Resident R55's clinical record failed to reveal the resident's labs were obtained on 8/6/24, as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and date food products in the reach-in cooler and walk- in freezer and failed to maintain sanitary conditions which created the potential for cross contamination (Main Kitchen). Findings include: During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 6/30/24, at 9:05 a.m. the following was observed: - 6 sandwiches no label or date (reach in cooler) - 1 salad, not covered no label or date - 4 foam containers, no label or date - 2 bags (reach in freezer), not secured, no label or date - 6 bags hoagie buns (walk in freezer), no label or date - 2 boxes, magic cup, ice cream (walk in freezer) on the floor During an observation of the dish room on 6/30/24, at 10:00 a.m. the following was observed: -Dietary employee drying dishes with a towel During an interview on 7/1/24 at 1:30 p.m. Dietary Manager E1 confirmed that the facility failed to properly label and date food products and practice proper infection control in the dish room which created the potential for food borne illness. 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the personal dignity for a resident during the dressing change observation (Resident R42). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 3/27/24, indicated the resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity. During an observation of a dressing change on 6/30/24, at 10:15 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E5 performed the treatment and then took a marker from her pocket and dated the dressing after placing the outer dressing to Resident R42's abdomen. During an interview on 6/30/24, at 10:25 a.m. LPN Employee E5 confirmed that the facility failed to provide a dignified experience during the dressing change. 28 Pa. Code: 201.29 (a)(b)(c) Resident Rights 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, incident reports, State reportable incidents, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident abuse altercation for one out of five sampled residents (Residents R24). Findings include: The facility Abuse, neglect and exploitation policy last reviewed 3/27/24, indicated that the facility will provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation. The facility will have written procedures to assist staff in identifying different types of abuse. This includes certain resident to resident altercations. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State agency, adult protective services and all other required agencies within specified time frames, which includes not later than 24-hours if the event that caused the allegation do not result in serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of four residents (Resident R56). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 3/27/24, indicated the care plan will describe, at a minimum, the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R56's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/10/24, indicated the diagnoses of unspecified dementia with unspecified severity and other behavioral disturbances (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of three residents (Resident R41). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion dated 3/27/24, indicated the facility will provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This includes appropriate equipment (braces or splints). Review of the admission record indicated R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/31/24, indicated the diagnoses of dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), anxiety, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R41's current physician orders on 7/2/24, indicated washcloth to be put between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for two of six residents, resulting in a fall for one of six residents (Resident R24), and resulting in potential interaction with an unsecured disinfectant for one of six residents (Resident R56). Findings include: Review of facility policy Accidents and Supervision dated 3/27/24, indicated the resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes identifying hazards and implementing interventions to reduce hazards and risks. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify and meet residents' highest practicable psych-social needs for one of six residents (Resident R33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Behavioral Health Services dated 3/27/24, indicated it is the facility's policy to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching and maintaining their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. The facility will monitor the resident closely for expressions or indications of distress and ensure appropriate follow-up assessments. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/6/24, indicated the diagnoses of diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), high blood pressure, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to date opened medications and properly store medications in one of three medication carts observed (Middle medication cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 3/27/24, indicated the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Observation on 6/30/24, 8:40 a.m. the Middle medication cart indicated the following medications stored in the drawer without a date and time on the insulin pens, indicating date opened as required for Resident R33's Lispro insulin pen (a short acting, manmade version of human insulin), and Tresiba (an ultralong-acting insulin). Interview on 6/30/24, 8:40 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E5 verified the two medications were not dated when opened as required. Interview on 6/30/24, at 2:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to date opened medications and properly store medications in one of three medication carts observed (Middle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of four residents (Resident 42) and failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential for cross contamination in the sole shower room. Findings include: Review of facility policy Dressing Change, Dry/Clean dated 3/27/24, indicated facility nurses will position the resident and adjust clothing to provide access to affected area. Pull glove over soiled dressing and discard into plastic bag. Wash and dry hands thoroughly. Put on clean gloves. Use clean technique (a set of practices used in healthcare to reduce the number of microorganisms and prevent contamination). Review of facility policy Infection Prevention & Control Program dated 3/27/24, indicated the facility will provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for twelve of nineteen residents testing positive for Covid-19 (Resident R1, R2, R5, R7, R8, R10, R11, R12, R16, R17, R18, R19). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Notification of Changes last reviewed 2/15/23, indicate the facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances requiring notification include but not exclusive to circumstances that require a need to alter treatment, significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated admission to facility on 9/11/20, with the diagnosis of Lymphoma (form of cancer), diabetes (high blood sugar levels) edema (swelling). Review of facility covid line listing indicated Resident R1 tested positive for COVID-19 on 2/21/24. Review of Resident R1's progress notes did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for transmission-based precautions for three of nineteen residents (Resident R1, R5, R8). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program revised 8/1/23, indicates the facility has established and maintains an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines. Isolation protocol includes but not exclusive to: - resident with an infection or communicable disease shall be placed on transmission-based precaution as recommended by current CDC guidelines. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated admission to facility on 9/11/20, with the diagnosis of Lymphoma (form of cancer), diabetes (high blood sugar levels) edema (swelling). Review of facility covid line listing indicated Resident R1 tested positive for COVID-19 on 2/21/24. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to update a care plan for one of three residents (Resident R23) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident after an elopement event. Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated 2/15/23, indicated the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the residents progress. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS (a periodic assessment of care needs). Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed. Review of the facility policy Elopements and Wandering Residents dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-06-30 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for six of 24 residents (Resident R3, R6, R27, R15, R17, R20, and R37).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission, and annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Resident R3 had an admission date of 4/20/26, with an MDS completion date of 5/15/26. Resident R6 had an Annual MDS ARD of 4/22/26, with an MDS completion date of 5/13/26. Resident R15 had an Annual MDS ARD of 4/2/26, with an MDS completion date of 6/4/26. Resident R17 had an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-11-13 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post complete contact information for State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, and accessible, and complete contact information for State Survey Agency at the facility as required. Findings include: During observations completed on 11/13/25, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman information posted in the front hallway did not include the Ombudsman's name, address, or email as required. This observation also revealed that State Survey Agency (SSA) contact information was listed approximately six feet from the floor in small print and did not include email, or current address, and did not include a statement that residents may file a complaint with SSA concerning any suspected violation of State and Federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property in the facility, and non-compliance with the advanced directive requirements, and requests for information regarding returning to the community as required. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$339,073 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $270,889 — penalty dated 2026-02-19
  • $63,990 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
  • $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AARON HANDLER FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/09/2022
GEORGE S. REPCHICK 2020 FAMILY DYNASTY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/09/2022
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GODINEZ, DANIELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HANDLER, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
SHOOP, REBECCAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$240K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 11%Medicare 2%Other / private 87%

This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$325per resident / day
operating cost
$9,889per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395160. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next