No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Embassy Of Tunkhannock

30 Virginia Drive, Tunkhannock, PA 18657 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (570) 836-5166 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$149,772 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $149,772 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Guthrie0.2 mi
512 Towne Plz · (570) 836-4294 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
230 W Tioga St · (570) 996-0440 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6 E Tioga St · (570) 836-3421 · Call to confirm hours
Park
112 River St · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.2%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.5%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.7%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.6%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine16.7%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.101.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.721.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
28.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.5%CMS range 30.3–51.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.4–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge28.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified56.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.6–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
54.4%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 65.7 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, documentation provided by the facility, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors and failed to implement effective procedures to accurately identify residents prior to medication administration. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation when a nurse administered a narcotic medication (morphine sulfate) prescribed for Resident 50 to Resident 51, causing profound bradycardia (abnormally slow heart rate) requiring emergency transfer to the hospital and administration of naloxone (a medication that reverses the effects of opioid overdose) on two occasions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure an effective system for resident identification, placing 9 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 7, 12, 23, 34, 48, 53, 59, and 65) at risk for serious injury, harm, impairment, or death.Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility provided investigative documentation, select facility policies, applicable state professional nursing standards, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services in accordance with professional standards of practice, resulting in actual harm. The facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse correctly identified a resident prior to medication administration for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 51). The failure resulted in the resident receiving another resident's prescribed opioid medication, causing adverse clinical effects requiring emergency medical treatment.Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse is responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select resident investigative reports, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide sufficient staff assistance and implement appropriate interventions based on individual resident needs to promote resident safety and prevent falls with serious injuries for one resident out of 7 sampled residents. (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of clinical records revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include muscles weakness, congestive heart failure (condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and generalized anxiety disorder (condition that involves excessive and persistent worrying that interferes with daily life). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) dated September 14, 2024, revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and select incident reports, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide individualized resident care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of an avoidable mucosal membrane pressure injury, with pain for one resident out of two sampled residents (Resident 23). Findings: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical Practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select incident reports and facility policy, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision of a resident with known unsafe behaviors to prevent a fall resulting in serious injuries, a fracture left humeral head and fracture of the left nasal bone, for one out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 12). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Falls Management System that was provided by the facility on May 21, 2024, indicated that each resident is assisted in attaining or maintaining their highest practicable level of function through providing the resident adequate supervision, assistive devices, and functional programs, as appropriate, to prevent accidents. It is the policy of this center to provide each resident with appropriate evaluation and interventions to prevent falls and minimize complications if a fall occurs. A review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure that a licensed nurse assessed, monitored, and documented a resident's condition following an unwitnessed incident for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of resident care regarding documenting assessments clinical problems, communications with other health care professionals regarding the resident communication with and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of a facility policy, information submitted by the facility to the state agency, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure planned safety interventions were effectively implemented to prevent a resident exiting the facility without staff awareness.for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of the facility's Elopement and Wandering Resident Policy last reviewed January 26, 2026, indicated the facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and, or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization (an order for discharge or leave of absence) and, or any necessary supervision to do so.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, job descriptions, facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to administer the facility in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing failed to ensure implementation, oversight, and enforcement of effective systems to support accurate resident identification prior to medication administration and resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when an opioid medication was administered to the wrong resident (Resident 51), requiring emergency medical intervention.Findings included: A review of the facility's Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) job description signed June 1, 2024 revealed that the NHA is responsible for directing the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure necessary resident-specific clinical information was communicated to the receiving health care provider at the time of an emergent transfer to the hospital for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 51).Findings include:A review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and transferred to the emergency department on [DATE]. The resident had an advance directive indicating a no code status (no code means that in the event the resident's heart or breathing stops, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not to be initiated). A progress note dated [DATE], at 6:30 AM revealed that at 5:30 AM Resident 51 was administered another resident's medication. Specifically, Resident 51 accidentally received morphine sulfate 0.5 ml (morphine sulfate is a potent opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain; opioid medications can slow breathing and heart rate and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, and facility provided documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) consistently received necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene and dignity for one resident out of 11 sampled residents (Residents 51). Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Personal Care Procedure, last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide and assist resident care and hygiene to each resident based on their individual status and needs. The policy defined personal care to include bathing, showers, oral care, and grooming. The policy further detailed that for residents who need assistance, it is the responsibility of the staff to provide as much help as needed, which may include total assistance for residents who are confused, or physically unable to do it themselves. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy, information provided by the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to report alleged violations of resident-to-resident abuse for two of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The policy indicates that an alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, a resident relative, or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be an indication of non-compliance with federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to timely identify changes in nutritional parameters, implement appropriate nutritional interventions, and notify the attending physician and the resident's responsible party of a significant weight loss for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 3).Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Weight Policy, last reviewed by the facility January 23, 2026, indicated resident weights would be obtained in a timely and accurate manner and documented and responded to appropriately. Upon admission or readmission, weights will be obtained and documented. The resident will be weighed every week for the following three (3) weeks, then monthly unless ordered otherwise by the medical doctor (MD) or nurse practitioner (NP) or the registered dietitian (RD). If a weight showed the same or greater variance, a nurse would verify the weight was obtained correctly. Significant weight losses of 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the statement of deficiencies from the survey ending January 30, 2026, it was determined the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective action plans to prevent continued quality deficiencies related to the facility's food and nutrition services department and implement effective plans to correct and prevent further quality deficiencies related to timely identification of changes in nutritional parameters, implementation of appropriate nutritional interventions, and notification of the attending physician and the resident's responsible party of a significant weight.Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed by the facility January 23, 2026, indicated the facility developed and maintains an effective, comprehensive, data-driven quality assurance and performance improvement program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and will utilize the best available evidence to design and measure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and a review of employee credentials, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the registered dietitian (RD) provided the required on-site oversight of the food and nutrition services department.Findings include: A review of a facility provided job description for the Registered Dietitian (RD) indicated the position purpose includes planning, organizing, developing, and directing the nutritional care of the residents in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines, regulations and established facility policies and procedures. Major duties and responsibilities included the following: to provide registered dietitian services in one or more sites according to policies and procedures; plan, organize, develop, and direct the nutritional care of the residents in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations; assesses/monitors the residents' nutritional status and provides recommendations to clinical/medical staff; observes resident meal services to ensure diets are correct and modifications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, employee personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to fully screen four employees out of five to ensure they were eligible for employment in a long term care nursing care facility. (Employees 1, 2, 3, and 4).Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed the requirement for screening potential employees including obtaining references from the most recent or previous employer. Review of employee personnel files revealed the following: Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse): Hired on September 30, 2025. The application listed previous employers, but there was no documentation showing the facility had contacted the most recent former employer to fully screen the individual to ensure the individual was eligible for employment in a long term care nursing facility. Employee 2 (Social Services): Hired on November 4, 2025. The application listed previous employers, but there was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director or designee participated in the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings on a quarterly basis for two of four quarters (Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 of 2025). Findings include:: A review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed the would develop and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program. However, the policy did not clearly identify required QAPI committee membership, did not specify required participation of the Medical Director or a designated physician representative, and did not outline attendance expectations or accountability for participation in quarterly meetings. A review of QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of March 2025 through January 2026 revealed that although QAPI meetings were conducted quarterly, the Medical Director or the Medical Director's designated physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and review of facility training and orientation records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all employees received required annual education on the facility's abuse prohibition policy and procedures. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, indicated the facility would educate its staff upon hire and annually thereafter regarding the facility's policy concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriate of resident property and how to handle resident-to-resident abuse and injuries of unknown sources. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on January 30, 2026, at 12:45 PM, the NHA reported that the Human Resources Director position was eliminated in mid-December 2025 due to budgetary reductions and that the responsibilities of the position were reassigned to administration. The NHA provided the educational content intended for the facility's annual abuse prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect their current needs and services required for one of 23 residents sampled (Resident 45).Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Planning last reviewed on [DATE], revealed the facility will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable goals and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. A clinical record review revealed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Diabetes Mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for a prolonged period.) and cerebral infarction (a type of stroke where the blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced). A review of Resident 45's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality according to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) were properly trained and validated as competent prior to administering intravenous (IV) medications through a central venous catheter for one of twenty-three residents reviewed (Resident 52). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) require the following:The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited mobility received the necessary services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings Include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include cerebral ischemia (a condition in which reduced blood flow to the brain limits oxygen and nutrients needed for brain function) and flaccid hemiplegia to the right dominant side (a condition where there is complete paralysis or weakness of the muscles on one side of the body). These conditions affected Resident 1's ability to move and use the right hand and arm. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 22, 2025, revealed that Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to timely identify changes in nutritional parameters, implement appropriate nutritional interventions, and notify the attending physician and the resident's responsible party of a significant weight loss for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 5).Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Weight Policy, last reviewed by the facility January 23, 2026, indicated resident weights would be obtained in a timely and accurate manner, and documented and responded to appropriately. Upon admission or readmission weights will be obtained and documented. The resident will be weighed every week for the following three (3) weeks, then monthly unless ordered otherwise by the medical doctor (MD) or nurse practitioner (NP) or the registered dietitian (RD). If a weight showed the same or greater variance, a nurse would verify the weight was obtained correctly. Significant weight losses of 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain records of controlled drugs and ensure accurate drug administration for two out of the 23 residents sampled (Resident's 4 and 58).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, last reviewed by the facility on January 23, 2026, revealed that medications are to be administered by licensed nurses or other staff authorized to do so by the state, as ordered by the physician, and in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent contamination, infection, and medication errors. The policy further requires that the licensed nurse administering a medication immediately document the resident's name, date and time of administration, dose, route of administration, and the signature of the nurse on the medication administration record. The policy also requires that medications classified as controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the statement of deficiencies from the survey ending January 30, 2026, it was determined the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective action plans to prevent continued quality deficiencies related to the facility's food and nutrition services department and implement effective plans to correct and prevent further quality deficiencies related to timely identification of changes in nutritional parameters, implementation of appropriate nutritional interventions, and notification of the attending physician and the resident's responsible party of a significant weight.Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed by the facility January 23, 2026, indicated the facility developed and maintains an effective, comprehensive, data-driven quality assurance and performance improvement program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and will utilize the best available evidence to design and measure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of ten sampled residents (Resident 1) was free of a significant medication error resulting in the administration of incorrect doses on multiple occasions. Findings include:A review of facility policy titled Coumadin Monitoring Procedure revealed it is the responsibility of the nurse to update the MAR (Medication Administration Record) with the new Coumadin dose order, and the PT/INR (Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio, blood tests used to measure how quickly blood clots) laboratory draw orders.A review of a facility policy titled Medication Administration revealed it is the responsibility of the nurse to compare the medication with the MAR to verify the right resident, medication name, form, dose, route and correct time of administration. A clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of five sampled was free of chemical restraints used to most readily control the resident's behavior and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the Facility's Policy labeled Restraint Free Environment last reviewed by the facility on June 1, 2024, reviewed on April 15, 2025, at approximately 1:30PM defines a chemical restraint as any medication that is used for discipline or staff convenience, and not required to treat medical symptoms. The policy further revealed the resident's medical record must include documentation that less restrictive alternatives were attempted to treat the medical symptom but were ineffective, ongoing re-evaluation of the need for the restraint and the effectiveness of the restraint in treating the medical symptom. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on March 4, 2024, with diagnoses to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, select facility policy review, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide timely and necessary foot care for one of eight residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the Facility's Ancillary Staff Policy last reviewed January 1, 2025, revealed it is the facility's responsibility to assist resident in obtaining routine and emergency ancillary services as needed including Podiatry. The policy then explains podiatry services include everything from toenail trimming to foot exams. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on March 4, 2024, with diagnoses to include vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (a condition caused by impaired blood flow, characterized by poor judgement and memory impacting daily functioning) and anxiety disorder (a disorder characterized by excessive worry and fear that can significantly impact daily life.) A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-21 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's surety bond, resident fund accounts, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the amount of the surety bond was sufficient to cover the total amount of resident funds held by the facility. Findings include: A review of the Resident Fund Trust bank account revealed average daily balances of: September 13, 2024, $155,582.09 September 18, 2024, $159,603.09 September 24, 2024, $155,907.09 September 25, 2024, $158,032.09 October 11, 2024, $149,969.76 October 15, 2024, $149,904.76 October 16, 2024, $153,880.76 October 17, 2024, $135,222.66 October 22, 2024, $133,642.76 October 28, 2024, $133,529.76 October 30, 2024, $133,487.42 November 1, 2024, $150,497.22 November 4, 2024, $133,493.62 November 5, 2024, $139,259.84 November 6, 2024, $140,624.84 November 7, 2024, $139,194.84 November 8, 2024, $140,194.84 November 12, 2024, $140,955.42 November 13, 2024, $143,050.22 December 12, 2024, $141,922.79 January 13, 2024, $130,801.51 A review of the facility's surety bond in place since June 11, 2024, revealed the coverage amount was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, a review of personnel files, employee credentials, and facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the necessary skill set and competencies to ensure appropriate nutritional oversight for residents. The facility also failed to ensure that the full-time Director of Food and Nutrition Services, who was not a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional, received frequent consultations from a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional. Findings include: Federal regulations require the facility to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to meet the nutritional needs of residents, considering resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the facility assessment. In the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian, the Director of Food and Nutrition Services must meet minimum qualifications and receive frequent consultations from a qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, a review of the facility's 4-week menu cycle, and Food Committee meeting minutes, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the menu was periodically reviewed and updated to reflect reasonable consideration of resident food preferences, thereby failing to enhance meal variety for six out of 20 sampled residents (Residents 26, 42, 30, 59, 65, and 15). Findings include: During a group meeting conducted on March 19, 2025, at 10:15 AM, Residents 26, 42, 30, 59, 65, and 15 reported concerns regarding the repetitiveness of the facility's menu and snack options. They stated that meal variety was lacking, side dishes were often unfamiliar, and portion sizes, particularly for meat-based dishes such as casseroles and tacos, were insufficient. Additionally, they expressed frustration that condiments such as sour cream and salsa were inconsistently available due to the facility running out due to the food order not arriving yet. Resident 26, the elected Resident Council President, stated, You get a teaspoon of meat when casseroles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy, resident staff interviews and direct observations, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely offer snacks to six of six residents interviewed (Residents 15, 26, 30, 42, 59, and 65). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Snack Policy indicated that snacks will be provided between meals if ordered and in the evening for residents who desire them. Furthermore, the policy indicated HS snacks will be delivered to the nurse's station. Nursing staff will offer residents the snack and will be responsible for making sure the snack intakes are recorded. Resident Council minutes dated December 30, 2024, indicated Residents were not receiving snacks. A grievance was filed December 30, 2024, by Resident 26 which stated, No snacks readily available, or if snacks are available the bowl of snacks are on top of the fridge - unreachable. Resident Council minutes dated February 25, 2025, revealed that residents must ask for a snack or retrieve it themselves. On February 25, 2025, Resident Council members filed a second grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively review and update its facility-wide assessment to ensure it accurately reflected the specific needs of its resident population and the personnel resources necessary to meet those needs for 24 of 71 residents. Findings Include: A review of the facility-wide assessment provided to the survey team on February 19, 2025, indicated that the facility had last reviewed its assessment on January 14, 2025. The document was intended to evaluate the specific and unique needs of the resident population, along with the available and accessible resources to meet those needs on a daily basis and during emergent situations. At the time of the survey ending March 21, 2025, the facility census was 71 residents, including 24 residents with a documented diagnosis of dementia. The facility-wide assessment stated that the facility provided a more structured environment with additional diversional activity hours on the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU), along with food-related activities and snacks as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide meal service in an environment that maintains each resident's dignity for two residents of 20 sampled residents (Residents 52 and 6). Findings include: On March 18, 2025, at approximately 11:55 AM, in the [NAME] Unit dining/game room, Resident 31, who is independent with eating, was observed seated at a table with Residents 52 and Resident 6. At 11:56 AM, staff placed Resident 31's lunch tray in front of her, and she began eating. However, Residents 52 and 6, who require assistance with feeding, did not receive their trays or staff assistance until approximately 30 minutes later. On March 19, 2025, at approximately 12:10 PM, in the [NAME] Unit dining/game room, Resident 31 was again observed eating her lunch while seated at a table with Residents 52 and 6. However, staff did not provide Residents 52 and 6 with their lunch trays or initiate feeding assistance until approximately 20 minutes later. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a residents' comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect their current needs and services required by three of 20 residents sampled (Residents 25, 49, and 64). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is inadequate supply of oxygen to the body's tissues) and diabetes (a chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces). A physician's order dated February 10, 2025, at 8:19 PM, directed oxygen administration at 2 liters (L) via nasal cannula continuously. A review of Resident 25's comprehensive plan of care, last revised on January 6, 2025, failed to reflect these updated medical treatment goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's activities programming, clinical records, staff and resident interviews, and observations, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs, interests, preferences, and functional abilities of its residents, including those diagnosed with dementia for six of six residents sampled (Residents 26, 42, 30, 59, 15, and 65). Findings include: A review of the facility census at the time of the survey ending March 21, 2025, revealed that the facility had 71 residents, including 24 residents with a documented diagnosis of dementia residing across both open resident units. A review of the facility's March 2025 activity calendar revealed a lack of variety in scheduled activities. The only dementia-specific activity, labeled as a Sensory Group, was scheduled three times during the month. Additionally, evening activities were scheduled only once per week (Thursdays at 6:00 PM), and weekend activities remained unchanged week to week, lacking variety or engagement. During a resident group interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses properly evaluated and provided nursing care according to physician orders for 4 residents out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 12, 24, 42, 64). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the Registered Nurse (RN) was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of pharmacy services necessary to assure the timely receipt and administration of physician-prescribed medications for two of twenty residents sampled (Residents 28 and 127). The facility also failed to maintain oversight of its medication dispensing system, including ensuring emergency medication availability and routine pharmacy audits. Findings include: Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 28, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include to dementia and cerebral infarction (stroke) with hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body). A physician order dated October 18, 2024, prescribed Oxycodone 5 mg (an opioid narcotic medication), one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. A review of the November and December 2024 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed that Oxycodone was signed out on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility practices, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate dining space to accommodate the number of dependent residents requiring staff assistance during meals in one of two occupied resident units (Blue Unit). Findings include: An observation of the Blue Unit dining room on March 18, 2025, at 12:15 PM revealed that five dining tables were occupied by thirteen residents in wheelchairs, while two additional residents in Geri reclining chairs were seated with mobile bedside tables in front of them. The dining area was congested, making it difficult for staff to pass through, set up meal trays, and assist residents effectively. The limited space also restricted residents' ability to maneuver safely within the room. A subsequent observation of the same dining area on March 19, 2025, at 12:35 PM revealed fifteen residents in wheelchairs seated among the five dining tables, along with two residents in Geri reclining chairs using mobile bedside tables. Due to the number of residents requiring assistance and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse policy, investigative reports, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from misappropriation of property, specifically resident medications, for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 28). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, last reviewed in January 2025, revealed that the facility is responsible for ensuring the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by implementing written policies and procedures prohibiting and preventing abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Misappropriation of property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of clinical record revealed that Resident 28, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include to dementia and cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living consistently received showers as planned to maintain good personal hygiene for two of 20 residents sampled (Residents 30 and 65). Findings include: During a resident group meeting conducted on March 19, 2025, at 10:15 AM, two out of six residents in attendance (Residents 30 and 65) stated they had not been showered as scheduled. Resident 65 stated I have not had a shower in a week because they do not have the help. Resident 30 stated she had not had her showers as scheduled. A review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (a cancer that originates in the bile ducts within the liver) and vascular dementia (a type of dementia caused by reduced blood flow to the brain). A quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of clinical necessity for administration of an antibiotic drug for one resident (Resident CR1) out of 20 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 had a physician's order dated January 27, 2025, for Ciprofloxacin HCL (an antibiotic medication) 500 mg, one tablet to be administered one tablet twice a day for seven days for the treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI). A review of a urine and a culture and sensitivity (C & S a urine culture is a method to grow and identify bacteria that may be in the urine. The sensitivity test helps select the best medicine to treat the infection) report dated January 28, 2025, revealed that it was positive for Escherichia coli a type of bacteria commonly found in the intestines, some strains of which can cause infections. The C&S report indicated that E. coli was resistant to Ciprofloxacin HCL, making the prescribed medication ineffective against the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and services between the facility and the Hospice agency for one resident (66) out of 20 sampled. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Coordination of Hospice Services, last reviewed by the facility on June 1, 2024, revealed it is the facility policy to coordinate a plan of care and implement interventions in accordance with the resident's needs, goals, and recognized standards of practice in consultation with the resident's attending physician/practitioner and resident's representative, to the extent possible. The policy indicates the plan of care will identify the care and services that each entity will provide in order to meet the needs of the resident and his/her expressed desire for hospice care. A review of Resident 66's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include peripheral vascular disease (a condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier infection control procedures for one resident out of the 20 residents sampled (Resident 12). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed by the facility on June 1, 2024, revealed it is the facility policy to expand the use of personal protective equipment and refer to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provided opportunities for transfer of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staff hands and clothing. The policy indicates nursing home residents with wounds are especially high risk for both the acquisition of and colonization with MDROs. The policy indicates that the facility will make gowns and gloves available immediately outside of the resident's room for those who require enhanced barrier precautions, and that clear signage will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and two of three resident pantries. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Review of a facility policy titled Food Storage that was provided by the facility on May 20, 2024, indicated that food storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a facility wide assessment that reflected the personnel and specific resources presently available and to identify those that are necessary to care for its current resident population. Findings include: At the time of the survey ending May 21, 2024, the facility failed to provide evidence that a facility assessment to determine the specific and unique needs of its resident population and the available and accessible resources to meet these needs on a daily basis and during emergent situations had been developed. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 19, 2024, at 1:00 PM, the NHA had indicated that the facility assessment was provided in the survey readiness binder. Additional interview with the NHA on May 21, 2024, at 1 PM indicated that the facility assessment had recently been updated yet failed to provide the survey team with the required document. There was no facility assessment presented to the survey team by survey ending May 21, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement - a framework utilized to guide an organization's performance improvement efforts) program. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement last revised August 29, 2022, revealed, the company is committed to developing, implementing, and maintaining an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility will: 1. Maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program which may include but is not limited to: a. systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events; and b. documentation demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities; 2. Present its QAPI plan to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on information provided by the facility, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement a quality assurance program to identify problems that are opportunities for improvement. Findings include: According to federal regulatory requirements at 42 CFR §483.75 (g)(2) the QAPI committee must: §483.75 (g)(2)(ii) Develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies; §483.75 (g)(2)(iii) Regularly review and analyze data, including data collected under the QAPI program and data resulting from drug regimen reviews, and act on available data to make improvements. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 21, 2024, at 10:36 AM revealed there was no evidence the facility had taken actions aimed at performance improvement since last annual survey completed April 21, 2023. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(3)(e)(1)(2)(4) Management

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee. Findings include: During review of QAPI committee on May 21, 2024, the Nursing Home Administrator was unable to provide evidence of any staff, administration, or Medical Director attendance to meetings. The NHA failed to provide evidence of QAPI Committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of April 2023 through April 2024. Interview with the NHA on May 21, 2024, at 10:36 AM confirmed that the facility failed to maintain a QAPI committee. 28 Pa. Code 211.2(d)(5)(6)(7)(8)(10) Medical director 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(2)(3)(4) Management.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the dietary department on May 18, 2024, at 8:38 a.m., revealed that the door latch to the facility's walk-in freezer was broken and did not make contact with the latch on the door jamb to secure it closed and left a gap around the perimeter of the door. Additionally, observed that the seal around the freezer door was ill-fitting. Upon entering the walk-in freezer, observed that the air curtain was ill-fitting, covered in frost, and had icicles hanging off the plastic strips and dripping on to the floor. The freezer entry way floor was covered in a thick coating of ice and was slippery. Additionally, observed that the cases of frozen food were encased in ice crystals and the wire metal shelves were encased in ice. At the time of the survey ending May 21, 2024, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) could not provide documented evidence that that the facility had acted upon the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to afford a resident and their designated representative the right to participate in the development of the resident's plan of care for five residents out of five interviewed during a resident group interview (Residents 19, 30, 37, 61, and 73). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated May 7, 2024, revealed that Resident 19 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy, the minutes from resident council meetings, grievance logs, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate timely action to resolve resident grievances raised at resident group meetings and keep the residents apprised of the status of the facility's decisions and efforts toward grievance resolution, including concerns expressed by five of the five residents interviewed during a resident council group interview (Residents 19, 30, 37, 61, and 73). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Grievance Policy and Guidelines, last reviewed by the facility in July 2023, indicated that all employees are responsible for ensuring customer satisfaction. The policy indicates that when concerns arise, a grievance system is in place to resolve the issues to the satisfaction of all parties involved. The policy also indicates that response to the grievance should be as soon as possible, but within ten working days of receipt of the grievance form. A review of resident council meeting minutes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment on two of two occupied resident care units. Findings include: An observation on May 18, 2024, at 11:10 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a ceiling block with a large brown and tan stain above the resident's mirror. In the resident's bathroom, cracks in the floor were observed extending around the edge of the floor. The bathroom wall to the left of the sink, revealed multiple areas of scraped paint, gray and black scuff marks, and exposed drywall. An observation on May 18, 2024, at 11:14 AM in the Nursing [NAME] Hall shower room revealed that the sink faucet continuously flowed water when in the off position. The shower room vent was observed to have a thick layer of gray dust. A gray bucket under a shower chair was observed to contain a brown and black substance. A toilet with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the minutes from Resident Council Meetings, scheduled facility mealtimes, and select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide snacks as desired by residents including 3 out of the 20 residents sampled (19, 30, and 37) and experiences reported by residents during a group interview (Residents 61 and 73). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Policy: Frequency of Meals, last reviewed in July 2023, indicated that nourishing snacks will be available for residents who need or desire additional food between meals. The policy indicates that residents will be offered nourishing snacks if the time span between the evening meal and the next day's breakfast exceeds fourteen hours. A review of the facility's scheduled mealtimes revealed that the time between dinner and breakfast the next day exceeds fourteen hours. A review of resident council meeting minutes dated April 12, 2024, revealed that all residents in attendance indicated that they were not receiving snacks. The meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication was stored at the appropriate temperature according to manufacturer's directions in one of three medication storage rooms reviewed. (Blue Wing) Findings include: Observation of the facility's medication storage refrigerator on May 20, 2024, at 9:41 AM in the presence of Employee 6, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed that the thermometer read 26 degrees Fahrenheit (6 degrees below freezing). Observation revealed the following medications stored in the medication refrigerator: Lorazepam Intensol 2mg/mL (oral concentrate), Promethazine 25mg suppositories, and the following insulins; Lantus Solostar 100 units/mL (3 mL) pen, Novolog Flexpen 100 units/mL (3 mL) pen, Victoza 18 mg/3 mL (3 mL) pen, Humalog Kwikpen 100 units/mL (3 mL), and Ozempic. Review of the medication room refrigerator temperature log dated May 2024, revealed that refrigerator temp. must be between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit. The staff are to report any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of facility's planned meal tickets, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate residents' food preferences, and provide foods planned for oral gratification for one resident of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 32). Findings included: A review of resident 32's clinical record indicated she was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, and gastroparesis (a condition which affects the stomach muscles and prevents proper stomach emptying). The resident's care plan, dated August 15, 2016, included a focus area of Nutrition, revealing the resident is dependent on tube feeding related to duodenal stricture, gastroparesis with a planned included that the resident is NPO (nothing by mouth, ice chips, clear Gatorade, coffee, and lemon Italian ice allowed) see orders section of medical chart, date revised December 13, 2022. The resident's care plan, also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the resident's needs on a daily basis for one out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 5). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (an immune-inflammatory disease that attacks and damages cells in the central nervous system and causes neurological impairment). Further review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order for Resident 5 to be admitted to hospice services related to a malignant neoplasm of the colon initiated on April 26, 2024. A clinical record review revealed a significant change in status comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) for Resident 5 dated May 4, 2024. According to the Long-Term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and grievances lodged with the facility and and interviews with the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings. The findings include: A review of the facility's Grievance Policy, last revised by the facility January 14, 2019, revealed that This facility has a system in place to ensure the resident's right to prompt efforts to resolve grievances that they may have. The policy noted The reasonable timeframe within which the resident can expect a completed review of the grievance is within 5 to 7 business days. A review of the facility's grievance log dated August 2023, provided by the facility during the survey of January 22, 2024, revealed that there were no grievances lodged during the month of August 2023. However, the facility provided four grievances that were raised on August 24, 2023, through Resident Council, that were not included on the log. These complaints…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's interested representative of the need to alter treatment as the result of the reoccurrence of a pressure sore for one resident out of 8 sampled (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted into the facility on October 17, 2020, with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), skin cancer of the left lower limb, and diabetes. A review of Resident CR1's clinical record revealed that on August 31, 2023, a stage 1 pressure area was identified on the resident's coccyx and treatment to the area was initiated. A review of Resident CR1's wound evaluation flow sheet dated October 13, 2023, revealed that the resident's coccyx pressure wound had healed. According to the resident's Treatment Administration Record, treatment to the area with peri-guard continued until October 24, 2023. On October 25, 2023, the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$149,772 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $46,270 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
  • $11,004 — penalty dated 2024-12-30
  • $92,498 — penalty dated 2024-05-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-12 for 21 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-21 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.4-2.4 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • AH DYNASTY LLC — private equity · 50.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • 2020 GSR DYNASTY LLC — private equity · 50.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC — private equity · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AARON HANDLER REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/01/2024
ANDREWS, HEATHERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/03/2021
FINN, NICHOLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/03/2021
LINAM, KIMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/27/2023
RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/03/2021
HANDLER, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
RAGER, KAMERONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2025
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
VALENTI, SAMUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2025
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 7%Other / private 18%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,743per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395433. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next