No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Embassy Of Woodland Park

18889 Croghan Pike, Orbisonia, PA 17243 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 125 certified beds · (814) 447-0300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 447-0300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation$8,155 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,155 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-10)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
626 Water St · (814) 447-5556 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
626 Water St · (814) 447-3934 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
438 Ridgley St · (814) 447-3311 · Call to confirm hours
Park
11880 Neelyton Rd · (814) 259-3252 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.1%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.9%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.8%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.3%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.2%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.181.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.881.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.4%CMS range 34.0–57.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.4–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge24.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge24.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.4–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
29.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 119.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of manufacturer's directions, clinical records, incident/accident reports, staff training records, and information submitted by the facility, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safe techniques were used during a transfer onto a mechanical wheelchair lift for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in a head injury. Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for use of the [NAME] Corporation FMVSS Public Use Lift (the type of lift platform in the facility's wheelchair van), undated, indicated that the lift platform must be positioned at floor level when loading and unloading in and out of the vehicle. The lift operator would load and unload the wheelchair passenger on the lift and use the up and down switch to control the movement of the platform. A visual and audible warning would activate if the threshold area was occupied when the platform was greater than one inch below floor level of the van. The bus and van competency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, observations, shower schedules, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for one of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 11).Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated May 20, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was usually able to understand others, was dependent on staff for showers/bathing, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease. The current care plan for Resident 11 revealed that it was very important that she choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Resident 11 preferred to have a bath/shower on the evening shift. Observations of Resident 11 on June 17, 2026, at 3:15 p.m. revealed that she was fully dressed and sitting in the hallway in her wheelchair. Review of the activities of daily living (ADL) documentation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents, clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for two of seven residents reviewed (Resident 3 and Resident 4) with incontinent briefs. Findings include: The facility's current NGB & Bariatric briefs height and weight sizing chart indicated that residents would be ordered briefs based on their height and weight. Size 1/Medium: 100-150 pounds; Size 2/Large: 130-230 pounds; Size 3/XL: 210-345 pounds; Size A/Bariatric: 320-385 pounds; Size B/Bariatric: 360-440 pounds; and Size C could be used for waist sizes 90-110 inches. Observations during an interview with Resident 3 on April 8, 2026, at 11:52 a.m. revealed that she was wearing two incontinence briefs (size 2) that had been taped together by staff to fit around her. Resident 3 revealed that she was embarrassed that her briefs did not fit and stated that she had a new electric wheelchair she would like to use but was worried that the briefs would leak if she had an incontinence episode. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for five of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 10, 11, 19 and 68). Findings Include: The facility's policy regarding the use of psychotropic medications, dated March 13, 2025, indicated that prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives for the medications, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase. The facility would document that the resident or resident representative was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the proposed care, the treatment alternatives or other options and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include:Observations of the walk in cooler on December 1, 2025, at 9:50 a.m. and December 3, 2025 at 1:43 p.m. respectively, revealed a shelving unit with an opened box of eggs and a box containing cartons of liquid eggs being stored on the bottom shelf, which was approximately 1.0 to 1.5 inches off the ground. On the floor beneath the shelving unit was debris including individual butter containers and brown onion skins.Interview with the Dietary Director on December 3, 2025, at 1:43 p.m. indicated that food should be stored at least six inches off the ground and confirmed that the floor underneath the shelf should be free of debris and food items that had fallen. The shelves were recently put in by maintenance.Observations of the facility's dishwasher on December 3, 2025, at 1:24 p.m. revealed that it was a high temperature dishwasher that was converted to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' dining and activity areas (100 hall), and for two residents who had holes in fitted sheets (Resident 18, 64). Findings include:Observations of the 100 hall dining room on December 1, 2025, at 12:11 p.m. revealed that there were three people eating in the room. There was a small vase of flowers sitting on the windowsill and approximately 30 dead insects that were light brown and dried out also on the windowsill. Observations of the 100 hall dining/activity room on December 3, 2023, at 3:32 p.m. revealed dead insects on the windowsill.Interview with Nurse Aide 1 on December 3, 2025, at 3:32 p.m. confirmed that there were dead insects on the windowsills and that they should have been cleaned up.Interview with the Director of Housekeeping on December 4, 2025, at 10:42 a.m. confirmed that there should not have been any dead insects in the areas mentioned.Observations of Resident 18's bed on December 4, 2025, at 10:45 a.m. revealed that there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include:The facility's policy for the use of psychotropic medications, dated March 13, 2025, indicated that psychotropic medications used on an as needed (PRN) basis must have a diagnosed specific condition and indication for the PRN use documented in the resident's medical record and was subject to the limitations as noted: PRN orders for psychotropic medications, excluding antipsychotics, shall be limited to no more than 14 days, unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes it is appropriate to extend the order beyond the 14 days. The medical record should include documentation from the physician or prescriber for the rationale for the extended time period and indicate a specific duration.An admission Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative, in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital, to ensure that a bed-hold notice was provided to the resident's responsible party and that the ombudsman was notified of the transfer to the hospital, for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 40, 46). Findings include:A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated September 10, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for all daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included heart failure and end stage kidney disease.A nursing note for Resident 9, dated February 2, 2025, at 11:48 a.m. revealed that the resident had increased weakness and was slow to respond at dialysis, and the resident was being sent to the emergency room. A nursing note dated July 4, 2025, at 10:06 a.m. revealed that the resident was bleeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 14 and 102). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) was to be no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that a significant change in the resident's status occurred (determination date + 14 calendar days) and the significant change comprehensive MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that significant a change in the resident's status occurred (determination date + 14 calendar days).Review of the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders to notify the physician of changes in weight for a resident with edema (fluid retention in body tissues) for one of 35 resident's reviewed (Resident 34), and failed to ensure that medications were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 62).Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 34, dated September 26, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance for care needs, received a diuretic (water pill) medication, and had a diagnosis that included heart failure (the heart can't pump blood as well as it should causing weight gain due to fluid to build up in the lungs and lower legs).Physician's orders for Resident 34, dated November 12, 2025, included an order for the staff to weigh the resident daily for weight gain/increase in edema and to notify the physician for a weight gain of greater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an updated order was obtained for the correct foley size available for urinary catheterization (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was completed as ordered for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 40). Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 40 dated September 15, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance for care needs, and had a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (a bladder dysfunction causing urinary incontinence or retention).Physician's orders for Resident 40, dated April 30, 2024, included an order for the resident to use an 18 french (size) foley catheter with a 30cc balloon, and may use a 5-10cc balloon if a 30cc balloon was not available.A nursing note for Resident 40, dated October 30, 2025, at 2:03 a.m. revealed that the resident's catheter was not able to be flushed and a 16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush an intravenous catheter (a thin tube inserted into a vein to administer medications and/or fluids) per facility policy for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding intravenous catheter flushing, dated March 13, 2025, indicated that catheters were to be flushed at regular intervals to maintain patency, before and after administration of medications. Staff were to use only preservative free 0.9 % sodium chloride for saline flushes (a mixture of water and salt, with a salt concentration of 0.9%).An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 34, dated September 26, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance for care needs, received an antibiotic and intravenous medications, and had a diagnosis that included Osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone).Physician's orders for Resident 34,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated November 3, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included depression, anxiety, and PTSD. A review of Resident 46's care plan, dated August 13, 2024, indicated that the resident had PTSD, anxiety, and Traumatic Brain Injury. There was no documented evidence the facility identified Resident 8's specific triggers that could re-traumatize the resident or implement measures as to how facility staff could prevent or minimize triggers from occurring.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending October 3, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 4, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to a homelike environment and safe and sanitary food storage. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding a homelike environment cited during the survey ending October 3, 2024, revealed that the facility would complete audits and report the results of the audits to the QAPI committee for review. The results of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures.The facility's current policy regarding food temperatures, dated March 13, 2025, indicated that the serving temperature of hot food at point of service should have a temperature of greater than or equal to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F).The menu for Monday, August 19, 2025, revealed that the lunch meal included baked fish, broccoli rice casserole, seasoned broccoli, and frosted cake. Observations in the main kitchen service area on August 19, 2025, revealed that the food cart to the 100 unit left the main kitchen at 11:54 a.m. and arrived on the 100 unit at 11:55 a.m. Trays were passed to the residents in their rooms and the last resident was served at 12:08 p.m. At 12:08 p.m. the temperature of the seasoned broccoli was 111.0 degrees F. The broccoli was lukewarm and did not taste appetizing. Interview with the Dietary Manager on August 19, 2025 at the time of the observation confirmed that the broccoli should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative was notified about a change in condition for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 28, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of a stroke.A nursing note for Resident 3, dated May 26, 2025, at 5:47 a.m., revealed that the resident was found on the floor in front of her wheelchair and was attempting to get herself off of the floor. There was no documented evidence in Resident 3's clinical record to indicate that her emergency contact was notified of the fall until May 29, 2025, at 8:54 a.m. (three days later).Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 7, 2025, at 10:26 a.m. confirmed that Resident 3's emergency contact was not notified until three days after the fall but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated March 13, 2025, indicated that medications are to be administered by licensed nurses in accordance with professional standards. Staff are to compare the medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc) with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to verify the resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. The staff are to observe resident consumption of the medication. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated February 2, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had constipation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medication appropriately for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated March 13, 2025, indicated that medications are to be administered by licensed nurses in accordance with professional standards. Staff are to compare the medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc) with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to verify the resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. The staff are to observe resident consumption of the medication. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated February 2, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had constipation and dementia. A care plan for Resident 4, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and the facility's written menus, as well as observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: A facility policy, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that menus shall be written in advance and followed. Any menu substitutions shall be made in an emergency situation only and recorded on the substitution log. An interview with a group of residents on October 1, 2024, indicated that the kitchen does not always serve what is on the menu. Observations of the kitchen on September 30, 2024, at 9:58 a.m. revealed that staff were preparing meatloaf, mashed potatoes, mixed vegetables (carrots, green beans, and wax beans), and vanilla cake for lunch. The facility's written and printed menu for the lunch meal on September 30, 2024, revealed that the residents were to receive meatloaf, mashed potatoes, Brussels sprouts, berry-topped yellow cake, coffee/tea, dinner roll, and margarine. Observations of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: A facility policy for food storage, dated March 15, 2024, revealed that all items being stored in the freezer must be labeled, dated, and sealed in the same manner and may be stored for the period of time per Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP - a systematic approach to the identification, evaluation, and control of food safety hazards) guidelines. Dry storage items must be six inches off the floor. Observations of the main kitchen during the initial tour on September 30, 2024, at 9:55 a.m. revealed that there were two cardboard boxes of coffee on the floor stacked one on top of the other. Observations in the three-door freezer on September 30, 2024, at 9:58 a.m. revealed a box with approximately two thirds of a chocolate cake that was not dated, labeled, or sealed. Interview with Dietary Director on September 30, 2024, at 10:08 a.m. confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two of 38 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 39). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding cleaning and disinfecting, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the facility was to provide a safe, comfortable, homelike environment. A quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated September 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required staff assistance for care needs, used a wheelchair, and had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (CP - neurological disorder that affects a person's ability to move, balance, and maintain posture.) Observations on September 30, 2024, at 1:24 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in his electric wheelchair in his room. The carpet in his room was black and worn. An interview with the resident at the time revealed that he felt that the carpet was very dirty, and that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the status of nursing licenses were checked with the State Board of Nursing for two of two nurses reviewed (Registered Nurse 1, Licensed Practical Nurse 2) and failed to complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse prevention, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the facility conducted background checks and will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure board or registry as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of resident property. The personnel file for Registered Nurse 1 revealed a start date of April 21, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence until October 2, 2024, that his license was verified with the State Board prior to him working. The personnel file…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 61). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the development of care plans, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care of the residents and meet professional standards of quality care. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated September 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and was frequently incontinent (two or more episodes of bowel incontinence, but at least one continent bowel movement) of bowel. Task records for the month of September 2024 were reviewed and indicated that Resident 61 did have two or more bowel incontinence episode weekly.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise/update care plans for two of 38 residents reviewed (Residents 39, 61). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that nurses and interdisciplinary team members were responsible for updating the resident's care plan to reflect changes in the resident's status. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 39, dated September 24, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included, heart failure, and chronic pain. Physician's orders for Resident 39, dated March 11, 2024, included an order for morphine sulfate solution (20 mg/ml), give one ml by mouth every eight hours for chronic pain. Physician's orders for Resident 39, dated May 1, 2024, included an order for morphine sulfate solution (20 mg/ml),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for residents for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 55). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 55, dated August 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. An elopement risk for the resident, dated August 10, 2024, revealed that the resident was an elopement risk and that she required a Wanderguard bracelet (an electronic device that alarms when near the exit door). A nursing note for Resident 55, dated December 12, 2023, at 3:18 p.m. revealed that the resident was visualized exiting the building. She had a history of verbalizing her desire to go home. Wanderguards had been attempted in the past; however, she usually removes them. A nursing note for Resident 55, dated July 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was found outside the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to verify registry verification prior to allowing individuals to work as a nurse aide for one of three newly hired nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3). Findings include: The personnel file for Nurse Aide 3 revealed that she was hired by the facility on July 10, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that the facility verified the nurse aide's standing with the state nurse aide registry until October 2, 2024. Interview with the Human Resources Director October 2, 2024, at 2:20 p.m. confirmed that Nurse Aide 3 did not have a nurse aide registry check completed prior to her start date and that she should have. 28 Pa. Code 201.29 Personnel Policies and Procedures.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 40) who had dementia. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 40, dated July 16, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, had no behaviors, and had diagnosis that included cerebrovascular accident/stroke and anxiety. A care plan for the resident, dated June 17, 2022, revealed that the resident has behaviors including screaming, yelling, refusal of care, throwing items, and being demanding of staff. Observations of Resident 40 on September 30, 2024, at 11:48 a.m. during and after incontinence care provided by Nurse Aides 4 and 5 revealed that she saw snakes on her comforter and dinosaurs outside of her window. Both Nurse Aides 4 and 5 assured the resident that the snakes were not harmful and would be helpful during care and this was a good day for Resident 40 in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: The facility's policy for storage of controlled medications, dated March 15, 2024, revealed that when administering a controlled medication, the controlled drug record form must be signed when the medication is removed from the narcotic box, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) must be signed after the medication is administered. Both documents must be signed. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated July 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand, was moderately cognitively impaired, had pain management, had a Stage IV pressure ulcer (wound caused by pressure with bone or tendon exposure), was receiving an opioid (controlled drug), and received hospice care (end of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications properly for one of 38 residents (Resident 53) and failed to label multi-dose insulin pens with the date they were opened in one of one medication cart observed (300 Long). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication labeling and storage, dated March 15, 2024, revealed that multi-dose medications that have been opened or accessed are to be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open medication. In addition staff are to prepare and observe the resident taking their medications. A diagnosis record for Resident 53 revealed diagnoses that included cancer of the prostate, high blood pressure, and heart disease. Observations on September 30, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. revealed that the resident was sleeping in his bed and he had a medicine cup full of pills on his bedside table. The medications included one large, white, round tablet; one small,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending November 30, 2023; January 29, 2024; April 30, 2024; and July 10, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending October 3, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to prove a safe, clean, homelike environment; failure to develop and implement abuse and neglect policies; failure to develop resident care plans; failure to be free from accident hazards; failure to maintain a complete and accurate account of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse and neglect for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat resident's symptoms. Failure to report abuse, neglect, exploitation may result in civil monetary penalties. Administration will investigate and report any allegation of abuse within the timeframes as required by federal requirements. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated, April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented care-planned interventions for one of five residents reviewed, resulting in injury (Resident 4). The facility's comprehensive care plan policy, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the facility is to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated, April 11, 2024, revealed that Resident 4 was cognitively intact, was clearly understood and able to clearly understand, required assistance with care needs, had weakness to one side, and had no fall history. A care plan related to care needs for Resident 4, dated February 9, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had a clean and homelike environment by failing to ensure that three medication carts and two mechanical lift machines were free of dirt and debris. Findings include: Observations on January 29, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. revealed that there was one stand-up lift machine parked in the hall that had a large accumulation of dirt, dust, debris, and food on the base of the machine. Observations of the full-body lift in the shower room at that time revealed that there was an accumulation of dirt, dust, and debris on the base of the lift. Interview with Nurse Aide 1 on January 29, 2024, at 10:11 a.m. revealed that she was not sure who was supposed to clean the mechanical lift machines. She stated she just uses them and did not notice the dirt or debris on the bases. Observations on January 29, 2024, at 10:18 a.m. revealed that one medication cart on the 300 hall had a large accumulation of hair, dirt, and debris on both of the rear casters. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 2 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding medication administration were followed for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 46, dated October 10, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, had diagnoses that included kidney failure, and required dialysis (process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Physician's orders for Resident 46, dated July 5, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive a 5 milligram (mg) tablet of Buspirone (anti-psychotic) three times per day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; an order dated July 5, 2023, for the resident to recive 0.4-0.3 percent Lubricant eye drops, one drop in both eyes four times a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcers were monitored and treated for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 34, 52). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 52, dated September 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had pressure ulcers. A nursing note for Resident 52, dated June 5, 2023, revealed that the registered nurse assessed the resident and found her to have an open area on her right buttock and that she was receiving treatment for the area. A Certified Registered Nurse Practioner (CRNP - an advanced practice registered nurse that can work independent of a physician) wound nurse note for Resident 52, dated June 13, 2023 revealed that she assessed the resident that morning and found a new open area on the resident's right buttock and that she ordered a wound treatment for the area.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions, facility policies, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors, by failing to ensure that insulin was administered as ordered by the physician for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 46, 55). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 46, dated October 10, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, had diagnoses that included kidney failure, and required dialysis (process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Physician's orders for Resident 46, dated August 1, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 14 units of Novolog Insulin at 12:00 p.m. everyday. A review of Resident 46's Medication Administration Record (MAR),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen and in one of two resident pantries. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding dating and labeling food, dated February 12, 2023, indicated that all food that requires time and temperature control should be labeled with the name, the date the food was made, and the use by date. The guidelines established by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for determining the length of time that the shelf-stable item can be maintained in dry storage would be used. The marking system shall consist of a color-coded label, the day/date of opening, and the day/date the item must be consumed or discarded. The facility's policy regarding storage of food brought in by family or visitors, dated February 12, 2023, indicated that the facility may refrigerate labeled and dated prepared items in the nourishment refrigerator. Observations in the kitchen's dry storage on November 27, 2023, at 10:12 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to enhance each resident's dignity by failing to provide privacy during wound care for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 55). Findings include: Facility policy regarding resident privacy, dated February 16, 2023, indicated that staff would provide care and treatment in such a way to maintain dignity and privacy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 55, dated September 5, 2023, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, cognitively intact, required substantial assistance, and had unstageable pressure ulcers (wounds caused by pressure). Observations of wound care on November 11, 2023, at 3:35 p.m. revealed that Licenced Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 changed Resident 55's dressing on the left lower leg. LPN 1 did not close the door or arrange the curtain to provide privacy. Resident 55's roommate was in the other bed and there was another resident in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete work-related reference checks upon hire for five of five staff reviewed (Nurse Aide 11 and 12, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 13, Registered Nurse (RN) 14, and Dietary Aide 15). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse and screening potential employees, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that the purpose of the policy was to ensure that the facility will screen employees for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating residents by attempting to obtain information from previous employers and /or current employers. The purpose is to ensure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences. The personnel file for Nurse Aide 11 revealed that she was hired on October 23, 2023. As of November 30, 2023, there was no documented evidence that the work-related reference checks were completed. The personnel file for Nurse Aide 12 revealed that she was hired on August 15, 2023. As of November 30, 2023, there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address specific care needs for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 34). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated February 16, 2023, indicated that individualized, comprehensive, person-centered care plans would be developed and implemented based on the resident's rights, including measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 3, dated September 3, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Nurse's notes for Resident 3, dated February 23, 2023, revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Pennsylvania Nursing Practice Act, clinical records, and the facility's investigative documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a professional (registered) nurse completed a timely assessment when changes in condition occurred for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 95). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 95, dated August 21, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff for daily care. A diagnosis list for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were transported in a safe manner for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 67). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding leg rests, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that for residents who self propel, the use of leg rests would be limited to when being transported by staff. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 67, dated November 2, 2023, revealed that the resident had moderately cognitive impairment, was sometimes understood, and could sometimes understand. A care plan for the resident, dated November 7, 2019, revealed that the resident had a self-care deficit related to arthritis and deconditioning, was not ambulatory, and had a broda chair with foam cushions and bilateral leg rests. Observations on November 27, 2023, at 12:13 p.m. revealed that Nurse Aide 2 pushed Resident 67 in a broda chair without foot rests…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to change an intravenous line dressing and caps (caps that disinfect IV ports) as ordered by the physician for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 109). Findings include: The facility's policy, dated February 16, 2023, indicated that central line (a tube placed in the neck, chest or arm to deliver medications) dressing changes are performed at established intervals to minimize site complications, and immediately when the integrity of the dressing is compromised. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 109, dated October 17, 2023, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, had diagnoses that included septicemia (a serious infection in the bloodstream), and received intravenous medications (IV therapy - medications administered directly into a vein). Physician's orders, dated October 22, 2023, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dialysis emergency kit containing appropriate equipment in order to stop bleeding was at the resident's bedside per physician's orders and care plans for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 72). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding dialysis care, dated February 16, 2023, indicated that the facility would ensure that residents undergoing dialysis treatments were assessed and safe, and that the facility, in collaboration with the dialysis unit, would meet the needs of the resident. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 72, dated November 9, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required hemodialysis (a process of cleaning the blood of toxins and returning it into the body). A care plan for the resident, dated March 17, 2023, revealed that the resident had dialysis related to end-stage renal disease and required an emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: The facility's policy for medication administration, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that the nurse responsible for administering the medication was responsible for charting the drug. The medication shall be charted as soon after the medication administration as possible. Each dose of a medication shall be initialed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 50, dated October 2, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand, had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), depression, chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety. Physician's orders for Resident 50,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and medication package inserts, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label medication with the date it was opened in one of two medication rooms reviewed (300 hall), and failed to ensure that controlled medications were stored in a separately-locked, permanently-affixed compartment in two of two medication refrigerators reviewed (200 and 300 Hall). Findings include: The facility's policies regarding medication administration and medication storage, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that once opened, a multi-dose vial was to have the date it was opened recorded on the container, and that controlled medications were stored in a separately-locked, permanently-affixed compartment in the medication refrigerator. Observations in the 300 hall medication room refrigerator on November 30, 2023, at 8:10 a.m. revealed that an opened vial of Tubersol (a medication used to test for tuberculosis - a bacterial infection) was not labeled with the date it was opened. Further observations revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor food preference for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: A policy for resident food preferences, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that upon admission (or within twenty-four hours after admission), the dietitian or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. Nursing staff will document the preferences in the care plan. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 50, dated October 2, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood, could usually understand, and required supervision from staff for eating. Observations during the lunch meal on November 27, 2023, at 12:24 p.m. revealed that Resident 50 received her tray in her room. The meal slip for Resident 50 indicated that she was to have mashed potatoes and gravy with every lunch meal. The lunch tray for Resident 50 did not have mashed potatoes and gravy on it upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 95). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated September 14, 2023, revealed that the resident had diagnoses that included chronic ischemic heart disease and cerebral palsy, required extensive assistance for care, was independent with locomotion, and required oxygen at bedtime. A care plan for the resident indicated that he had recovered from COVID pneumonia, had chronic bronchitis and asthma with intermittent shortness of breath, and used nebulizer treatments as needed. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated March 29, 2022, included an order to change the nebulizer mask and tubing weekly on Thursday night shift and place in a dated plastic bag when not in use. Observations in Resident 1's room on November 28, 2023, at 1:47 p.m. revealed a date on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending January 11, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending November 30, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to comply with abuse policies, failure to develop resident care plans, failure to meet professional standards of care, failure to provide quality care, failure to provide an environment free of accidents or hazards, failure to keep complete and accurate medical records, and failure to follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hand washing/hand hygiene was completed during wound care for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 39, 55). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding wound care and hand washing/hand hygiene, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that staff were to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. In addition, gloves should be removed and hand hygiene done prior to moving from a dirty to clean task. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 39, dated November 2, 2023, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff for care tasks, had diagnoses that included diabetes and peripheral vascular disease (a circulation disorder in the blood vessels), and had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (skin breakdown from pressure that exposes fat under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance, by failing to ensure that the resident's call bell was in working order for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding call lights: accessibility and timely response, dated February 16, 2023, revealed that the facility is to be adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 64, dated August 15, 2023, indicated that the resident was confused and that she was independent for her daily care needs. The resident's care plan, dated October 24, 2021, indicated that she was at risk for falls, her call light was to be within reach, and that staff were to respond promptly.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-03 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 62, 95) who remained in the facility for long-term care. Findings include: A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, completed by the facility and dated July 30, 2024, revealed that Medicare coverage for Resident 62 started on July 11, 2024, and that her last covered day was July 30, 2024. The form indicated that the facility initiated discontinuation from Medicare Part A coverage and that the resident's benefit days were not exhausted. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form was not issued at least 48 hours in advance. The Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage for Resident 62 was not issued. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, completed by the facility and dated July 8, 2024, revealed that Medicare coverage for Resident 95 started on June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,155 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,155 — penalty dated 2024-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Longmeadow Care CenterRavenna, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EMBASSY PA TENANT 2 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/10/2020
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/10/2020
REPCHICK, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2020
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2025
HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2025
HANDLER, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/10/2020
NEWMAN, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$487K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 8%Medicare 3%Other / private 89%

This home reported $487K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$298per resident / day
operating cost
$9,062per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395697. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next