Embassy Of Huntingdon Park
1229 Warm Springs Avenue, Huntingdon, PA 16652 · For profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (814) 643-4210 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 22.8% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.5% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 46.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 7.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.0%CMS range 22.9–45.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.1%CMS range 9.0–18.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 22.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.7–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians orders regarding medication administration were followed for three of 47 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 63, and 85). Findings include:The facility policy for medication administration dated July 10, 2025, included that medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff that are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated February 5, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, could understand, was understood, required assistance with personal care needs, had diagnoses that included high blood pressure and heart disease. A care plan for Resident 2 dated February 9, 2023, revealed that she had an alteration in her cardiovascular system (heart) due to high blood pressure, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of planned, written menus, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their pre-approved planned menu. Findings included:Interview with Resident 44 on March 4, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. revealed that her pureed food never tastes good. Interview with Resident 87 on March 4, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. revealed that her pureed food tastes off and not right. Review of the posted menus for the lunch meal on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, revealed that residents were to receive BBQ glazed meatloaf, mashed potatoes, green beans, fruit cup, peanut butter brownie, 2% milk, and unsweetened iced tea.Observations of a test tray for the lunch meal service on March 4, 2026 revealed that the pureed meat was not pureed BBQ meatloaf, it was a pureed angus beef patty. The pureed menu indicated pureed BBQ meatloaf, pureed mashed potatoes, pureed green beans, apple sauce, and chocolate pudding. The meatloaf and the pureed angus beef did not taste similar at all.Observations of the second floor hallway outside of the second floor dining room on March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings Include:A facility policy regarding food storage, dated July 10, 2025, revealed that foods that are stored on ladder/speed racks must be fully covered to prevent contamination from airborne contaminates as well as dripping condensation. Either use a bag that covers the entire cart, or cover each individually.Observations of the walk in cooler on March 2, 2026, at 9:58 a.m. revealed an uncovered wheeled tray cart. The top tray had individual cookies on Styrofoam plates that were not wrapped and were open to air. The tray below the cookies was individual servings of pureed pears that were not wrapped and were open to air. Interview with the Dietary Director on March 2, 2026, at 10:03 a.m. confirmed that food should be coveredObservations and Interview with the Dietary Director on March 2, 2026, at 10:03 a.m. revealed approximately nine packages of frozen chicken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of two of 47 residents reviewed (Residents 35, 52) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 35, dated February 19, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and that he had an indwelling urinary catheter. A care plan for Resident 35, dated February 14, 2026, revealed that the resident had an indwelling catheter.Physician's orders for Resident 35, dated February 15, 2026, included an order for the resident to have a Urinary catheter. Observations of Resident 35 on March 2, 2026 at 10:39 a.m. revealed the resident sitting up in his wheelchair with his urinary catheter drainage bag attached to the underside of his chair and visible from the hallway and not inside a privacy bag.Observations of Resident 35 on March 3, 2026 at 1:53 p.m. revealed the resident sitting up in his wheelchair with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for one of 47 residents reviewed (Resident 13) and in the second floor shower room. Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated January 5, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and that she ambulated with a wheeled walker.Observations in Resident 13's room on March 2, 2026 at 10:59 a.m. revealed that a large floor tile was missing in front of the resident's chair. Observations in the second floor shower room on March 3, 2026 at 10:59 a.m. revealed that there were several tiles missing from the shower floor around the drain. The areas that were missing the floor tiles were observed to contain a slimy black removable substance.Interview with the Maintenance Director on March 5, 2026 at 12:10 p.m., revealed that the missing floor tiles should be replaced in Resident 13's room and in the shower room and that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and information provided by the facility, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was completed into the resident's concerns during food committee.Findings include:A facility policy regarding dated July 10, 2025, concerns/grievances revealed Social Services and designee will instruct facility to submit to the social services director that all concerns received will be investigated with in 72 hours following receipt of the concern. Within seven days following the receipt of the concern, the facility will inform the complainant.Food committee meeting minutes dated December 17, 2025 revealed that the residents wanted anything other than chicken, and again on January 21, 2026, residents were tired of chicken and sweet potatoes.There was no documented evidence that the residents' concerns about too much chicken were addressed. The current menu cycle has chicken being served 15 times over 21 days. Chicken is served for lunch every Monday, Tuesday, and Friday in addition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records and investigative reports, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from any physical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one of 47 residents reviewed (Resident 48).Findings include:The facility's policy on restraints, dated July 10, 2025, indicated that restraints included any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment that restricts freedom of movement or access of the resident to their body.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated February 4, 2026, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses osteoarthritis of the knee and intellectual disabilities. Observations on March 2, 2026, at 11:32 a.m. revealed that Resident 48 was seated at a table in the second floor dining room in a broda chair (specialized wheelchair) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 47 residents reviewed (Resident 11).Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated November 20, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included depression, anxiety, and PTSD. There was no documented evidence that the facility identified Resident 11's specific triggers that could re-traumatize the resident or implement measures as to how facility staff could prevent or minimize triggers from occurring, and there was no documented evidence of a care plan for PTSD. Interview with the Acting Director of Nursing and Regional Consultant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least annually for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 4, Nurse Aide 5, and Nurse Aide 6). Findings include:Review of Nurse Aide 4's personnel file revealed that she was hired July 14, 2010. There was no evidence that Nurse Aide 4 had a performance evaluation completed since July of 2024.Review of Nurse Aide 5's personnel file revealed that she was hired June 1, 2017 There was no evidence that Nurse Aide 5 had a performance evaluation completed since July of 2024.Review of Nurse Aide 6's personnel file revealed that she was hired June 14, 2011. There was no evidence that Nurse Aide 6 had a performance evaluation completed since August 2024. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 4, 2026 at 10:38 a.m. confirmed that performance evaluations were not completed for Nurses Aides 4, 5, and 6 since 2024 and that they should be done annually.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in two of two medication carts reviewed (First floor and second floor carts), and failed to discard expired medical supplies (Residents 46, 72, 80, 82). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage dated [DATE], revealed that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The facility's policy regarding medication disposal dated [DATE], revealed that the nursing staff will date multidose vials and discard opened vials as outlined to decrease the risk of contamination and bacterial or fungal growth from multidose vials. Observation on the second floor medication cart long hall on [DATE] at 10:40 a.m. revealed a Novolog KwikPen (insulin) for Resident 80 was opened on [DATE], and should have been discarded 28 days after that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, clinical record reviews, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor food preferences for one of 47 residents reviewed (Resident 26).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding nutrition services, dated July 10, 2025, for Patient Menu Selection indicated the purpose is to ensure patients' preferences are taken into consideration when menu selections are placed. Patient food preferences are respected and appropriate dietary substitutions are made. Situations might include patients with strong likes/dislikes, patients hospitalized for long lengths of time, ethnic food preferences and those observing cultural or religious dietary laws. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26, dated December 17, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care, and was independent with eating after set-up. A nutritional care plan for Resident 26, dated March 16, 2025, indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending April 10, 2025, and complaint surveys ending August 19, 2025 and February 10, 2026, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending March 5, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to quality of care, food storage/prepare/serve-sanitary, and infection control.The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding quality care, cited during the surveys ending April 10, 2025, August 19, 2025, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate signage was posted for a resident with special infection control isolation needs for three of 47 residents reviewed (Residents 35, 89, 90). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding isolation precautions, dated July 10, 2025, indicated that isolation precautions were to be implemented when a resident had an indwelling catheter and staff were to post the appropriate isolation sign on the room entrance door.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 35, dated February 19, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and that he had an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident's care plan, dated February 14, 2026, indicated that the resident had a Foley catheter. Physician's orders for Resident 35, dated February 15, 2026, included an order for the resident to have a urinary catheter.An admission MDS assessment for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the resident and the responsible party's right to make informed decisions regarding his/her treatment for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:A facility policy for residents' rights regarding treatment and advanced directives dated December 10, 2025, indicated that it is the policy of the facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advanced directives. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated January 4, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnosis that included cirrhosis of the liver (condition in which the liver is scarred and permanently damaged), and was receiving Hospice (program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1) and failed to assess a wound for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated January 4, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnosis that included cirrhosis of the liver (condition in which the liver is scarred and permanently damaged), and was receiving Hospice (program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life) services. Physician's orders for Resident 1 dated January 4, 2026, included for the resident to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of Cipro (an antibiotic) every morning and at bedtime for purulent (a thick, often yellowish or greenish fluid that indicates an active bacterial infection) drainage for 10 days. Review of the Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcers were treated with the current physician's orders for one of 8 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated January 4, 2026, revealed that the resident was confused, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had pressure ulcers. Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated, February 4, 2026, was for the right foot to be cleansed with soap and water, apply Calmoseptine, then a heel cup, and to change daily.A Certified Registered Nurse Practioner (CRNP - an advanced practice registered nurse that can work independent of a physician) wound nurse note for Resident 4, dated February 3, 2026, revealed that the resident's treatment to the pressure ulcer on her right heel had changed from Gentamicin to Calmoseptine. A review of Resident 4's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards. Findings include: The facility's policy for Oxygen, dated December 10, 2025, revealed that portable oxygen tanks would be stored in a safe manner, in an upright position.Observations of the 100 hall, short side, on February 10, 2026 at 1:45 p.m. revealed there was a metal stretcher with a full portable oxygen tank laying on the middle section, unsecured. The stretcher was parked outside of resident's rooms and was within reach of the residents.Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 on February 10, 2026 at 1:45 p.m. revealed that the oxygen tank should not have been stored in the hallway on the stretcher. She further stated she did not know why the stretcher was there either.Interview with the Regional Nurse on February 10, 2026 at 2:02 p.m. revealed that the oxygen tank should have been stored securely and not laying on a stretcher in the hallway. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding medication administration were followed for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility policy for medication administration dated July 10, 2025, indicated that medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff that are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated June 24, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included heart failure. Physician's orders for Resident 2 dated October 31, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 50 milligrams (mg) of Metoprolol Succinate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) every day for hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: The facility's policy for wound management, dated July 10, 2025, indicated that wound treatments would be provided in accordance with physician's orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 3, dated July 16, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand, was cognitively impaired, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. A nursing note, dated August 15, 2025, at 8:30 p.m. revealed that Resident 3 had a fluid filled blister to the right abdomen measuring 1.5 x 1.5 centimeters (cm). Physician's orders, dated August 15, 2025, included an order for skin prep (protective barrier) to be applied to the blister on her abdomen every day and evening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 20), failed to administer insulin per manufacturer's instructions for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 78), and failed to follow wound recommendations for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 20, dated March 3, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, received insulin, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 20, dated March 19, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 17 units of Humalog (fast acting insulin) subcutaneously with meals for diabetes. The insulin was to be held if the resident's blood sugar was less than 100 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 20 for January, March, and April 2025 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow pressure ulcer treatment recommendations from a wound consultation for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 11). Findings include: The facility's wound treatment policy, dated January 9, 2025, revealed that to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it was the policy of the facility to provided evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. Wound treatments would be provided in accordance with physician orders, and in the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse would notify the physician to obtain treatment orders. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance for her care needs, and had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food safety, dated January 9, 2025, indicated that all food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption, and all food should be covered labeled and dated with the date it was opened. Observations in the walk-in cooler on April 7, 2025, at 9:20 a.m. revealed that there were five trays of chicken and five trays of broccoli that were covered with plastic wrap and not dated with the date they were prepared. Observations in the walk-in freezer on April 7, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed that there were opened bags of carrots, green beans, corn and dinner rolls not secured and not labeled with the date they were opened. Observations in the main kitchen on April 7, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff reported an allegation of verbal abuse in a timely manner for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated January 9, 2025, indicated that staff would report any incidents of suspected abuse immediately to administration. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated January 17, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff with daily care tasks, and had diagnoses that included hydrocephalous (excess of fluid on the brain). Facility investigation documents, dated January 10, 2025, revealed that Nurse Aide 1 was assisting Nurse Aide 2 transfer Resident 5 to her wheelchair on January 5, 2025, at breakfast. Nurse Aide 1 heard Nurse Aide 2 yelling loudly at Resident 5. The resident asked the nurse aide if she could have her shoes on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 27). Findings include: A facility policy related to anticoagulation therapy, dated January 9, 2025, indicated that the facility will implement the procedure for the treatment/management of residents receiving anticoagulation therapy (i.e. low molecular weight heparin or warfarin/coumadin). The facility in collaboration with the physician will provide therapeutic coagulation for the resident while attempting to decrease the potential morbidity and mortality associated with anticoagulation therapy. The charge nurse will obtain an order from the physician for any pertinent labs for monitoring of the anticoagulation therapy. The nurse will notify the physician and document the results of the prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT/INR-blood tests that determine how long it takes the blood to clot). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 41). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-21 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility requirements according to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing information for one of four quarters reviewed (fiscal year quarter one 2024). Findings include: Review of Section 6106 of the ACA requires facilities to electronically submit direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff) based on payroll and other auditable data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Submission must be received by the end of the 45th calendar day (11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time) after the last day of each fiscal quarter to be considered timely. First quarter reporting includes data from October 1st through December 31st and is due by February 14th. Second quarter reporting includes data from January 1st through March 31st and is due by May 15th. Third quarter reporting includes data from April 1st through June 30th and is due by August 14th. Fourth quarter reporting includes July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 39, 75). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated April 16, 2024, indicated the comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 28, dated March 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, able to understand what was being said, required assistance with care needs, had an unstageable pressure ulcer to sacrum, received intravenous therapy (administration of fluids and/or medications directly into a person's vein), and received an antibiotic. A care plan for Resident 28, dated March 22, 2024, revealed that the resident had a midline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush an intravenous (IV) line and to change an intravenous line dressing and caps (caps that disinfect IV ports) as ordered by the physician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding intravenous (IV) catheters (a tube placed in a vein that can be used to deliver fluids and/or medications), dated September 17, 2019, revealed that when a resident was ordered intravenous medication, a 10 milliliter (ml) saline flush (a method used to clean a catheter of blood or medication) was to be administered before and after each medication that was infused. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated April 7, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and received IV medications. A nursing note, dated April 1, 2024, at 11:15 a.m., revealed that Resident 48 was admitted to the facility and had a double lumen (two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that ice was prepared and stored under sanitary conditions in one of two ice machines observed, and failed to ensure that food in the main kitchen was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The facility policy for cleaning the ice machines and ice storage containers, dated April 16, 2024, indicated that all ice machines will be cleaned monthly, at a minimum, with approved sanitizing agent. Observations of the second-floor ice machine on the May 21, 2024, at 8:20 a.m. revealed a dark, removable substance on the inside of the ice machine in the area where water flows and ice is dispensed. Interview with the Assistant Maintenance Director on May 21, 2024, at 1:51 p.m. confirmed that the ice machine had a dark, removable substance inside the ice machine. He stated that he had cleaned the first-floor ice machine at the beginning of the month and that the machine on the second floor was overdue to be cleaned. Cleaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate services to maintain personal grooming and hygiene for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 13) who was dependent for care. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding personal care, dated April 16, 2024, revealed that nail care cleaning and trimming should be completed as needed, unless the resident is a diabetic or has another reason it should not be done. In such cases a nurse or podiatrist (a medical specialist who helps with problems that affect feet or lower legs) will provide care. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated February 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and dementia. The resident's care plan, dated February 26, 2020, revealed that the resident had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and facility investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place and functioning to prevent behaviors for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 66). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 66, dated February 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, was able to understand what was being said, was cognitively intact, had behaviors affecting others, and required assistance with care needs. A care plan for Resident 66, dated January 30, 2024, revealed that the resident was observed displaying sexually inappropriate behavior. Review of a facility incident report, dated February 29, 2024, revealed that it was reported by staff that Resident 66 had his hand on another resident's genitals over his pants in the hallway. The other resident was removed from the situation and the registered nurse was made aware. It was noted that both residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 48). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated April 16, 2024, indicated that staff were to sign the Medication Administration Record (MAR) after administering medications and if the medication was a controlled substance, staff were to sign the narcotic book. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 28, dated March 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, able to understand what was being said, required assistance with care needs, had an unstageable pressure ulcer to sacrum, and had complaints of pain. A physician's order for Resident 28, dated March 29, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 2.5 milligrams (mg) of oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) every six hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending April 27, 2023, and July 21, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey ending May 21, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies regarding care plan timing and revision, grooming and personal and oral hygiene, and ensuring that the resident's environment remained free from accident hazards. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding a failure to update resident care plans, cited during the survey ending April 27,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBASSY PA TENANT 2 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/10/2020 |
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/10/2020 |
| HANDLER, AARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| REPCHICK, GEORGE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/09/2022 |
| EMBASSY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| HERITAGE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2025 |
| ANDERSON, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ROSCOE, BRANDON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $332K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395297. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.