Embassy Of Park Avenue

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 108.3 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-09 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented required visits by writing, signing, and dating a physician progress note for each visit for six of six residents reviewed (Residents R4, R7, R8, R9, 10, and R11) and failed to ensure that the physician signs and dates all orders during each of his/her visits for one of size residents reviewed (Resident R11). Findings include: A facility Policy entitled Physician Visit and Physician Delegation dated 3/5/26, revealed The physician should see the Resident within 30-day of initial admission to the facility, The physician should date, write, and sign a progress note for each visit and The physician should sign and date all orders except for the flu and pneumococcal vaccines. Resident R4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/1/25, with diagnoses that included Osteoarthritis (Occurs when protective cartilage that cushions the ends of the bones wears down over time leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-09 · tag F0712 — pattern
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician alternated required resident visits with the nurse practitioner or physician's assistant for four of six residents reviewed (Residents R4, R8, R9, and R10). Findings include: A facility Policy entitled Physician Visit and Physician Delegation dated 3/5/26, revealed The physician should assign alternate physician or physician extender to make visits as appropriate by State Law and At the option of the physician, required visits in SNF's (skilled nursing facilities) after the initial visit, may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist that is acting within scope of practice defined by State law and under the supervision of the physician. Resident R4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/1/25, with diagnoses that included Osteoarthritis (Occurs when protective cartilage that cushions the ends of the bones wears down over time leading to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement dignified feeding practices and to maintain resident dignity for seven of 18 residents interviewed (Residents R7, R8, R9, R15, R16, R24, and R25).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Resident Environmental Quality dated 8/29/25, revealed It is the policy of this facility to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents. Review of facility policy entitled Paper Products in the Dietary Department dated 8/29/25, revealed To ensure safe, sanitary, and high-quality food service operations by prohibiting the use of paper products (e.g., paper plates, bowls, cups, and disposable utensils) within the dietary department. This policy supports infection control, regulatory compliance, cost management, and resident dignity. Paper products are not permitted for use in food preparation, plating, or service within the dietary department except in approved…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, clinical and facility records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a shower/bath as resident preference for seven of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R8, R9, R19, R20, R21, R22, and R23). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Personal Care Procedure dated 8/29/25, revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide/assist resident care and hygiene to each resident based on their individual status and needs. This includes such things as baths/showers (may be a bed bath), oral care (mouth care, denture care) resident grooming and peri-care/catheter care. Our residents are different in terms of how much resident care they can do their own. Some residents: can take care of their own resident care needs without our help, others need a little help, some need a lot of help with this care, and still others can do nothing on their own and are dependent on staff to provide all of their resident care to them. Independent Residents - provide privacy, and assist as needed. (May need help with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, facility records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with planned menus and failed to note or update menu changes and notify residents of a change to the posted menu for five of 18 residents interviewed (Residents R7, R11, R16, R24 and R25).Findings include: Review of a facility policy dated 8/29/25, entitled Menu change policy revealed To ensure that all menu changes within the skilled nursing facility support resident preferences, nutritional adequacy, regulatory compliance, and safe food-service operations; any change to the posted or planned menu must be intentional, documented, and communicated to residents and staff; substitutions must be of equal nutritional value and meet resident preferences and dietary restrictions; menu changes require documentation on the monthly menu substitution log; menu changes must be communicated to the dietary staff during pre-meal huddles, nursing staff, residents via menu board or general…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly maintain safe operation of essential equipment in the main kitchen and prevent excessive buildup of frost in the walk-in freezer. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Freezer with a policy review date of 8/29/25, indicated that all walk-in freezers shall be cleaned at least every six months; remove excess ice build-up; report any damage or any need of repair to the Maintenance Department. Observations of the walk-in freezer in the Main Kitchen on 2/18/26, at 10:30 a.m. revealed areas with an accumulation of ice including on the ceiling that extended out from the condenser to the other side of the walk-in-freezer, as well as multiple areas on the floor by the entrance to the freezer. Ice accumulation was observed on frozen food item boxes on the top of the shelves to the right and left of the entrance door. Condenser coils were observed frozen in ice. During an interview on 2/18/26, at the time of observation, the Dietary Manager confirmed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of a facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in a resident pantry in two of four refrigerators reviewed (Rehab Unit and North Unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, dated 8/29/25, revealed that The facility may refrigerate labeled and dated prepared items in the nourishment refrigerator; The prepared food must be consumed by the resident within 3 days; If not consumed within 3 days, food will be thrown away by facility staff; All items not maintained are subjected to being thrown away if not removed by the resident and/or resident representative. Observations on 12/8/25, at 11:57 a.m. of a refrigerator in the Rehab Unit used for residents revealed three single serve containers of cottage cheese with a resident name and expiration date of 11/24/25, and one can of Celsius-Retro Vibe drink without a resident name or date. During an interview on 12/8/25, at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement dignified feeding practices and to maintain resident dignity and respect by serving meals in a timely manner to individuals seated at the same table for two of two dining areas observed (North and Haven). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Dining Experience Policy dated 10/28/24, indicated All residents seated at the same table should be served before moving to another table. Review of facility policy entitled Safe and Homelike Environment dated 10/28/25, indicated In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a . comfortable and homelike environment . Observations of the afternoon meal in the North and Haven dining rooms on 4/9/25, between 12:40 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. revealed the following. On 4/9/25, at 12:40 p.m. there was a table in the north dining room with five residents seated together around the table. Four residents were consuming their meals while one resident without their meal, watched the others…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and emergency contact timely regarding a change in condition for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Notification of Responsible Party and Physician Procedure, dated 10/28/24, indicated that the nurse should notify the Primary Care Physician when a resident has a significant change in clinical status such as a decline in condition, new/worsening symptoms, new/change in pain status The nurse or designee will notify the responsible party regarding change in the resident's clinical status The clinical record revealed that Resident R1's initial admission date was 1/17/23, with diagnoses including nstemi myocardial infarction (a serious heart attack causing damage related to a reduced blood supply to the heart), type II diabetes (when the body does not use insulin properly with poor blood sugar control), and muscle weakness. The clinical record progress notes revealed that on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Safe and Homelike Environment dated 10/28/25, indicated In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a . comfortable and homelike environment . Review of four weeks of dietary schedule lacked evidence that the appropriate number of trained dietary staff were scheduled each day. Review of grievances revealed that residents going to dialysis did not have meal trays ready for residents to consume before going to dialysis. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes and food committee minutes from 3/25/25, revealed resident concerns of food is warm or not hot. Interviews on 4/9/25, between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. with Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10 revealed that they are receiving meals in Styrofoam containers several days a week and the food is often cold as a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $525K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA