Embassy Of Valley View

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility Water Management Program, review of the Centers for Disease Control Prevention(CDC) guidance for Legionella prevention, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an effective Water Management Program was in place to prevent and/or detect the presence of Legionella in the water supply. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the undated facility diagram titled How to Monitor Your Control Measures, revealed disinfectant levels were to be checked where the pipe from the intersection of the road entered facility property and at sink, shower, and tub faucets used by residents. Review of facility water testing logs from 01/01/24 through 05/29/24 revealed no disinfectant levels were tested and no Legionella testing was conducted. All water temperatures obtained has results between 105 degrees Fahrenheit and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the online CDC guidance for controlling Legionella titled Monitoring Building…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interview, review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Black Box Warning, review of the Highlights of Prescribing Information, review of [NAME] Pocket Drug Guide for Nurses, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate indications for the use of antipsychotic medications. This affected four (#9, #10, #34, and #35) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/24 , with diagnoses including severe dementia with psychotic disturbance, hallucinations, and restlessness and agitation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/22/24, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 00. The resident was assessed to have received antipsychotic medication on a routine and as needed basis while residing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record reviews, observation of a refund check, staff interviews, and review of the resident admission agreement, the facility failed to provide timely refund for overpayment of stay. This affected two (#98 and #299) of four residents reviewed who expired in the facility. The census was 47. Findings include: Review of Resident #98's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and heart disease. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. The resident's wife was the responsible party and privately paid for the stay. Review of Resident #299's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia and adult failure to thrive. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. The resident's son was the responsible party and privately paid for the stay. Observation [DATE] at 1:20 P.M., during review of the resident fund accounts revealed evidence of a refund check for an overpayment that was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have emergency supplies on hand for a resident with a tracheostomy. This affected one resident (#10) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/25/22, with the following medical diagnoses: unspecified dementia, laryngeal cancer, tracheostomy, seizures, adult failure to thrive, hemiplegia, peripheral vascular disease, depression, chronic pain, aphonia, COVID-19, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, schizoaffective disorder, and traumatic brain injury. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/19/24 revealed this resident is severely impaired with cognition. Review of all physician orders for the month of May revealed no information prior to 05/29/24 for maintaining emergency equipment for a resident with a tracheostomy. Review of a physician order dated 05/29/24 revealed orders for interventions related to ambubag and emergency equipment. Observation on 05/28/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on employee time sheet review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse on duty for eight consecutive hours. This affected 41 of 41 residents in the building. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the facility employee time sheet on 03/02/22 revealed on 02/12/22, Registered Nurse (RN) #105 was the only RN on duty and worked from 7:00 A.M. to 2:45 P.M. for 7.75 hours that day. Review of the facility employee time sheet on 03/02/22 revealed on 02/13/22, Registered Nurse (RN) #105 was the only RN on duty and worked from 7:00 A.M. to 2:45 P.M. for 7.75 hours that day. Review of the facility employee time sheet on 03/02/22 revealed on 02/19/22, Registered Nurse (RN) #120 was the only RN on duty and worked from 7:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. and 12:30 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. for 7.50 hours that day. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/02/22 at 4:20 P.M. verified the facility did not have eight hours of Registered Nurse coverage on 02/12/22, 02/13/22, and 02/19/22.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, policy review, temperature log review, infection control log review, manufacture's recommendation review, the facility failed to ensure sanitation was provided when cleaning dishes and food was stored properly. This affected 41 of 41 residents that receive food from the kitchen. Facility census was 41. Findings include: Observation on 02/28/22 at 9:03 A.M., revealed an unopened can of fruit cocktail with multiple dents on the rim of the can, a box of 10-15 zucchini which had become moldy; a bag of mozzarella shredded cheese open to air and unsealed in the refrigerator; and a bag of frozen french fries was open to air and undated in the freezer, with french fries falling out of the bag onto other items. Interview on 02/28/22 at 9:03 A.M., with Dietary Manager (DM) #155 confirmed kitchen storage findings. DM #155 revealed cans are reviewed for dents and are returned to the send for refund. DM #155 confirmed the can of fruit cocktail had been missed. DM #155 confirmed and threw out the box of moldy vegetables, opened cheese and opened french…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure clean laundry was protected from crossed contamination with soiled laundry. This had the potential to affect 41 of 41 residents at the facility. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Observation on 03/01/22 at 11:32 A.M., of the facility laundry room revealed two doors side by side when entering the laundry room, however, the facility utilized one of the doors when entering the laundry room (the other door was blocked by a table and soiled laundry). The single washer was located inside upon entry into the laundry room facing the door. A few inches to the left of the washer were two-32 gallon which contained soiled laundry. The clean laundry container containing clean laundry was touching one of the soiled laundry containers. The single dryer was located behind the washer and the soiled laundry area. The room did not have a separated clean and soiled area. The room did not have an exit door beyond the dryer. The laundry area did not have a sink. Once the laundry was clean and folded, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary resident bathrooms and failed to maintain safe water temperatures. This potentially affected 22 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #12, #15, #19, #20, #21, #26, #27, #28, #29, #183, #186, #233, #234, #235) of 22 residents that could independently use the bathroom independently. Facility census was 41. Findings include 1. Observation on 02/28/22 at 2:04 P.M., revealed the common space bathroom for resident's located across from gathering room had a pervasive odor of feces noted upon entering bathroom, a brown substance smeared on toilet seat, a large trash can to right of door with lid that does not close with a tight seal and several small clear bags full of trash noted in trash can. Observation on 02/28/22 at 2:10 P.M., revealed a male resident entered and used the common space bathroom for resident's located across from gathering room. Observation on 02/28/22 at 2:14 P.M., revealed a staff member and Safety and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to keep a call light in reach. This affected one resident (#235) of one reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 41. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #235 revealed an admission date of 11/21/20. Diagnoses included other fracture of the head and neck of right femur fracture, covid-19, dementia without behaviors, diabetes type two, kidney disease stage three, anxiety, depression, cognitive impairment, needs for assistance, need for continuous supervision, and hypertension. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #235 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff members for transfers, bed mobility, and toilet use and extensive assistance of one staff for ambulation. Review of the plan of care dated 01/17/22 revealed Resident #235 was at risk for an activity of daily living (ADL) decline with interventions of assist with bed mobility and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-07 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and policy, the facility failed to notify residents of Medicaid account balances. This affected two residents (#08 and #11) out of two residents reviewed for notification of Medicaid account balances. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 01/17/17. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, insomnia, and personal history of Coronavirus (COVID)-19. Review of the Resident #08's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/22, revealed resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed he required supervision from staff with bed mobility, transfers, walking, eating, toilet use and limited assistance from staff with dressing. Review of Resident #08's nursing progress notes did not reveal any conversation from staff to his resident representative regarding his Medicaid spend down. 2. Record review of Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/16/05. Diagnoses included dementia without behavior disturbance, hypokalemia, diabetes mellitus 2,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $520K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH