Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 59.4 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, manufacturer medication information, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #69 was free from significant medication error. Actual harm occurred on 07/29/24 when Resident #69 required evaluation and treatment in the emergency room due to a significant medication error of the resident's Topiramate (anti-epileptic/seizure medication). The resident had been administered, per the nurse practitioner, greater than three times the recommended dose of the medication (ordered 100 mg twice a day and received 625 mg twice a day) from 07/24/24 until 07/29/24 when the error was discovered. This affected one resident (#69) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #69's admission orders provided by the family per the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a hospital After Visit Summary report dated 09/25/23. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2022-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained and in good working condition to prevent a fall with injury for Resident #13. This affected one resident, Resident #13, of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 78. Actual harm occurred on 01/28/21 when Resident #13 sustained a fall resulting in a neck fracture while being assisted by one State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) during a shower in a shower bed. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/13 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, hypertension, contracture, cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the plan of care dated 10/08/19 revealed Resident #13 required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) related to cognitive impairment, hemiparesis immobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's wound treatment was performed as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 77.Findings include:A review of Resident #43's clinical record revealed an admission date of 07/14/25 with diagnoses including high blood pressure, heart arrhythmias, heart failure with a cardiac pacemaker, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, atherosclerotic heart disease, and high cholesterol.A review of Resident #43's wound assessment dated [DATE] indicated the left shin wound measured 0.80 centimeters (cm) long by 2.40 cm wide by 0.1 cm deep. The wound was draining a slight amount of serosanguinous fluid with attached wound edges and intact surrounding tissue. The wound was classified as a skin tear.A review of Resident #43's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/02/25 to perform the left shin wound treatment every Tuesday,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented during Resident #22's incontinence and wound care care and Resident #43's wound care. This affected two residents (#22 and #43) of three residents reviewed for EBP. The facility identified 16 residents who required EBP. The facility census was 77.Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #22's clinical record revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 with diagnoses including fracture of the right patella and upper end of humerus, atherosclerotic heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, morbid obesity, anxiety, gastroesophageal reflux disease, high blood pressure, diverticulosis, cardiomegaly, kidney stones with hypertensive kidney failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia, encephalopathy, and obstructive reflex uropathy.A review of Resident #22's physician's orders revealed an order dated 03/11/25 for gloves and gown to be worn when providing dressing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident's emergency contact regarding a change in condition. This affected one resident (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled therapy after having a hip replacement. Resident #100 was discharged home on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses include diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, congestive heart failure, and osteoporosis. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #100 revealed the resident was taking Eliquis (an anticoagulant) 5 milligrams (mg) twice a day for blood clot prevention. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment for Resident #100, dated 10/14/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, was in need of supervision for toileting, and was receiving speech therapy, occupational therapy, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to honor Resident #72's preferences for showers. This affected one resident (#72) of two residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. Review of the undated shower schedule revealed Resident #72 received her showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays from 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. Review of the shower sheet dated 03/09/24 revealed Resident #72 refused her shower on afternoons and wanted her showers in the mornings. Review of the nursing progress note dated 03/12/24 revealed Resident #72 wanted to change her shower times from the evenings to the mornings. Interview on 03/25/24 at 9:44 A.M. with Resident #72 revealed she wanted her showers earlier in the day. She stated she had asked the facility staff, and they told her she had to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document weekly weights in the medical record for Resident #9. This affected one resident (#9) of four residents reviewed for nutrition services. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 08/30/06 with diagnoses including aphasia, right non-dominant side hemiplegia, hypokalemia, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/28/24 Resident #9 was to have weekly weights on Wednesdays. Review the Weight Summary revealed on 02/28/24 Resident #9 weighed 162.4 pounds and on 03/06/24 Resident #9 weighed 147.3 pounds. There were no additional weights recorded for 03/13/24 and 03/20/24. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March 2024 revealed missing weight documentation for 03/13/24 and 03/20/24. Review of the Medical Nutrition and Hydration assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-02-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dietary manager completed qualifications in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the key personnel revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #610 as the kitchen director. Interview on 02/08/22 at 11:14 A.M. with DM #610 revealed she had worked for the facility for 16 years, seven as the dietary manager. DM #610 stated she was in the process of obtaining her certification as a dietary manager but had not started the classes. Interview on 02/08/22 at 12:24 P.M. with the Administrator verified DM #610 did not have the required qualifications and the Administrator was going to enroll DM #610 into classes to become a certified dietary manager. Review of the Dietary Director Job description under education included must possess a minimum of a high school diploma, be a graduate of an accredited course of dietetic training approved by the American Dietetic Association or have certifications as a certified dietary manager from an approved…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-02-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the meal sheets, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there were alternative menu choices with variety to meet resident preferences. This affected three residents (#16, #49, and #83) of four residents (#16, #49, #71, and #83) reviewed for food and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 06/03/21 and discharge date of 06/25/21. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, hypertension (HTN), mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of physician orders for June 2021 identified orders for regular diet, regular texture, and regular consistency. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/24/19. Diagnoses included HTN, diabetes mellitus (DM), and GERD. Review of physician orders for February 2022 identified orders for regular, no added salt diet, regular texture, and regular consistency. Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hair nets while in the kitchen and the 100 hall nursing unit refrigerator was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/07/22 at 8:51 A.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #796 scooping cooked ground beef out of a pot and into a steam table pan. DA #796 was not wearing a hairnet. Interview at the time of the observation with DA #796 verified DA #796 was not wearing a hair net. Observation on 02/08/22 at 2:02 P.M. revealed DA #904 washing her hands then retrieving serving utensils to puree food for the dinner meal. DA #904 was not wearing a hairnet. Interview at the time of the observation with DA #904 verified DA #904 was not wearing a hair net. Review of the undated facility policy titled Hair Restraints revealed hair restraints shall be worn by all employees while in the kitchen to cover all hair. 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-02-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and uncluttered area surrounding the outside dumpster. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observation on 02/07/22 at 8:56 A.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #796 of the outside dumpsters revealed garbage bags piled high and a moderate amount of debris and empty cardboard boxes in the snow surrounding the dumpsters. Interview at the time of the observation with DA #796 verified the observations. DA #796 stated the dumpsters always looked like this and the nursing aides threw trash around the dumpsters instead of putting trash inside of them. DA #796 stated the maintenance department was responsible for keeping the dumpster area clean.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident record contained current and accurate information for Residents #67 and #82. This affected two residents (#67 and #82) of two reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was alert with cognitive impairment and required assistance of at least two persons for activities of daily living. Observation on 02/07/22 at 9:06 A.M. revealed no operational call light designated for Resident #67. Review of the progress note dated 02/07/22 at 12:25 A.M. revealed Resident #67's call light was within reach. Review of the progress note dated 02/07/22 at 11:41 A.M. revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,970 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,970 — penalty dated 2024-09-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH