Embassy Of Willard

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 14% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility bus observation, staff interviews, medical record review, review of the incident log, review of the facility internal investigation, review of facility provided photographs, review of hospital records, review of facility bus safety manual, review of facility bus wheelchair restraint user manual, review of wheelchair manual, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11, who was identified to be dependent on staff for all aspects of care, was safely secured with a seat belt and positioned properly in a wheelchair during a transport on the facility bus. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening injuries when Resident #11 fell out of her wheelchair mid-transport and landed on the floor, sustaining a subdural hematoma and subarachnoid hemorrhage to the left side of her head, requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for monitoring. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for use of assisted device during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-07-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility assessment, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment evaluated residents to determine the number of staff needed in the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment last dated 04/02/26 stated the facility determined the facility needed one full time Director of Nursing (DON), one full time Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), nine full time licensed nurse supervisors, five as needed licensed nurse supervisors, 17 full time nursing assistants, two part time nursing assistants, and four as needed nursing assistants for nursing staff. Further review of the facility assessment revealed no evaluation was completed to determine the number of staff needed for the acuity of the residents.Interview on 07/16/26 at 9:41 A.M. with the Administrator verified the facility assessment did not evaluate resident needs to determine the number of staff needed in the facility. Furthermore, the Administrator verified the number of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of resident fund accounts, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately manage resident funds. This affected one (#02) of one resident reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 10/22/25 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, and type II diabetes mellitus.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 that indicated the resident was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #02 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and had a lower extremity impairment on one side. Review of the care plan dated 10/29/25 revealed Resident #02 was independent with meeting emotional, intellectual, physical and social needs, and had an ADL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were consistent throughout the medical record. This affected two (#14, #40) of two residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 55.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care (CC) form dated [DATE] and located in the resident's physical paper chart revealed the resident had a chosen a DNRCC-Arrest (DNRCC-A) protocol (the DNR Comfort Care protocol would be implemented in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest). Review of a physician order in the electronic medical record, dated [DATE] and discontinued on [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication effectiveness and adverse effects/side effects. This affected three (#03, #09, and #25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 47 residents receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 55.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 05/06/26 and a readmission date of 07/10/26. Diagnoses included depression, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care initiated 05/07/26 revealed the resident was at risk for episodes of anxiety. Interventions revealed to administer medications as ordered and monitor for side effects and effectiveness. Review of the plan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a dental care plan for a resident. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included volvulus, intestinal obstruction, and epilepsy.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 that indicated she was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #35 required some assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated 05/02/26 revealed Resident #35 required assistance with ADLs, was at risk for weight loss, chewing problems, and had oral and/or dental health problems with interventions that included refer to dental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were administered per physician orders. This affected two (#14, #10) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified seven residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 05/29/26. Diagnoses included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident had a stage three pressure ulcer present on admission. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility. Review of the care plan initiated 05/29/26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a stage three pressure ulcer to the sacrum.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the manufacturer's instructions for the mechanical lift slings, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring was in place for mechanical lift slings utilized in the facility. This affected two (#01 and #34) of two residents reviewed for mechanical lift slings. The facility identified 12 residents requiring the use of slings for mechanical lift transfers. The facility census was 55.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #01's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/09/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus, aphasia, muscle weakness, and hypertension.Review of Resident #01's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Furthermore, Resident #01 was dependent for chair to bed and bed to chair transfers.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen orders specified liters per minute (lpm). This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/25. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder with psychotic features. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, anxiety, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, mild persistent asthma, age-related osteoporosis, and urinary incontinence. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. Furthermore, Resident #10 required the use of oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #10's care plan dated 06/24/26 revealed Resident #10 had altered respiratory status or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely dental services. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included volvulus, intestinal obstruction, and epilepsy.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 that indicated she was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #35 required some assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated 05/02/26 revealed Resident #35 required assistance with ADLs, was at risk for weight loss, chewing problems, and had oral and/or dental health problems with interventions that included refer to dental services, be free…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were maintained during wound care. Furthermore, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when the staff failed to wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for resident care when the resident was identified as requiring EBP. This affected three (#10, #33 and #14) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility identified 13 residents in the facility requiring EBP. The facility census was 55.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/25. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder with psychotic features. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, anxiety, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, mild persistent asthma, age-related osteoporosis, and urinary incontinence. Review of Resident #10's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,655 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,655 — penalty dated 2025-04-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $322K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH