Oak Hills Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a building in good repair. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63.Findings Include:During an environment tour on 03/03/26 from 8:02 A.M. to 8:22 A.M. revealed physical damage to resident rooms and the hallways throughout the facility. Damage included general dents and chipped paint on walls throughout the building in the hallways. Observation in the hallway outside of Resident #05's room revealed a hole in the wall near the floor behind a carpeted wall. Inside Resident #05's room revealed holes on both sides of the bathroom door. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], which was empty, revealed significant wall damage on the wall with the window and missing baseboards. Observation by the nursing station revealed the wall adjacent to the station had been patched however it was unpainted, the base board on the side of the nursing station was missing, and the wall surrounding the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, review of the water temperature logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were within an acceptable range to promote resident comfort. This had the potential to affect 10 Residents (#05, #06, #14, #19, #21, #22, #42, #46, #54, and #64) identified as residing on the 100 hallway. The facility census was 63. Findings Included:Observation on [DATE] at 9:50 A.M., with the Regional Director of Asset Management #895 revealed Resident #05's water temperature was taken using the facility's digital thermometer in the resident's bathroom measuring at 104 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview on [DATE] at the time of observation with Regional Director of Asset Management #895 verified Resident #5's water temperature was not within desired range of 110-120 degrees F.Interview on [DATE] at 10:14 A.M. with the [NAME] President of Asset Management #896 revealed their maintenance director had quit about one week prior. The [NAME] President of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the hospital records, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety regarding the use of marijuana products. This affected two Residents (#27 and #60) out of three reviewed. The facility census was 63.Findings Included:1. Review of medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 02/09/17 and diagnoses including schizophrenia, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, aphasia following cerebral infarction, and diabetes mellitus.Review of the Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #27 required set up or clean up assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of nursing progress note dated 01/31/26 at 5:49 A.M. revealed Resident #27 was observed in his room standing in a puddle of urine. Resident #27 was assisted to the bathroom. Resident #27 stated he felt fine but was unable to make it to the toilet in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during a wound treatment. This affected one (Resident #16) out of three reviewed for pressure ulcer treatment. The facility census was 63.Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date 09/24/25. Diagnosis included muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of right buttock, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and restless legs syndrome.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had memory impairment. He was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). He was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.Review of the physician orders revealed on 02/24/26 gloves and a gown were to be worn when providing treatment to Resident #16's sacral wound. The treatment was to cleanse the sacrum with normal saline, pat dry with gauze, apply calcium alginate (a debridement treatment), cover with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of the dishwashing machine temperature logs and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate dishwasher temperatures to ensure clean and sanitary dishware. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the low-temperature dishwashing machine logs from 03/01/25 through 06/03/25 revealed wash temperatures were not to be below 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and were to be checked once per shift. During the time period reviewed, wash temperatures were documented to be below 120 degrees F on 83 occasions. During an observation on 06/04/25 at approximately 1:35 P.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #471 revealed the last load of dishes following the lunch meal was in the process of being washed using the low-temperature, chemical-sanitation dishwashing machine. The dishwashing machine reached a maximum temperature of 112 degrees F for both the wash and the rinse cycles. The dishwashing machine was run numerous times and there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. The census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/25 at approximately 8:50 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #471 revealed two exterior dumpsters with trash laying around the dumpsters. The trash included an empty cheese wrapper, disposable gloves, an aluminum can, disposable plastic lids, clear plastic bags, empty bread bags, an empty salad dressing bottle, crumbled aluminum foil, an empty nutritional shake bottle, empty sugar packets, empty Styrofoam cups, plastic eating utensils, and more than 50 cigarette butts on the ground. Further observation revealed more than 10 clear-plastic garbage bags filled with trash including briefs and gloves. Concurrent interview with DS #471 verified the debris on the ground around the dumpster and further stated the facility had various animals in the area.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in good repair. This affected six (#1, #7, #19, #41, #52 and #56) of nine residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 59. Findings included: 1. Observation on 06/03/25 at 8:18 A.M. of Resident #7's room revealed the wall to the right of the air conditioning unit had an unknown black substance and the drywall was crumbling. Additionally, there were brown stains on the wall above the air conditioning unit. Interview on 06/05/25 at 10:22 A.M. with Director of Maintenance (DOM) #428 verified the wall around the air conditioning was crumbling and a black mold-like substance was present. DOM #428 confirmed the brown stains on the wall above the air conditioning unit and stated the brown stains were the result of a water leak. 2. Observation on 06/02/25 at 9:19 A.M. of Resident #52's bathroom revealed four tiles on the wall were missing and the sink was pulled away from the wall by approximately 1.5 inches. Interview on 06/05/25 at 10:18 A.M. with DOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident code status was accurately documented throughout the resident's medical record. This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 12/02/22. Diagnoses included leukemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart disease. Further review revealed Resident #8's code status was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCCA). Review of the physician order dated 11/12/24 revealed Resident #8 was a DNRCCA code status. Review of Resident #8's hard chart revealed a red paper stating DNRCC (Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care). Further review revealed the physician signed advanced directive stated Resident #8 was a DNRCC code status. Interview on 06/03/25 at 3:30 P.M. with Register Nurse (RN) #476 revealed a resident's code status should match throughout the resident's EMR and hard chart to ensure appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-05 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their resident smoking policy related to the outside smoking area. This had the potential to affect Residents #4, #8, #12, #13, #17, #21, #25, #27, #29, #30, #32, #34, #35, #36, #40, #41, #42, #46, #54, #56 and all facility residents. The facility census was 58. Findings Include: Observation of the outside smoking area on 04/05/25 at 1:30 P.M. with the Administrator revealed approximately 75 to 100 cigarette butts on the ground. Multiple piles of leaves were also noted on the ground with cigarette buts intertwined in the piles of leaves. Additionally six cigarette receptacles made of combustible plastic were observed in the area and were all approximately 75% or more full. A seventh receptacle container made out of a plastic bucket from a local big box home improvement store was also used as a cigarette receptacle and was over ninety percent filled to the top with cigarette butts. In total approximately three to four hundred cigarettes butts were present in the area on the ground and in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were monitored by a physician and had a stop date after 14 days of use. This affected one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, anxiety, and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #1's prescribed medications list for 10/01/24 through 11/24/24 identified an order dated 10/16/24 for Ativan (anti-anxiety) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams every eight hours as needed for anxiety. The Ativan was active as of 11/25/24. An interview on 11/25/24 at 3:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified the Ativan was ordered to be given as needed beginning on 10/16/24 and did not have a stop date. This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-05 for 74 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $281K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH