No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Longmeadow Care Center

565 Bryn Mawr, Ravenna, OH 44266 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (330) 297-5781 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 297-5781 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 actual-harm citations$47,486 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $47,486 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
951 E Main St · (330) 235-6138 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy0.4 mi
909 East Main Street
Grocery
1145 E Main St · (330) 298-3650 · Call to confirm hours
Park
530 N Freedom St · (330) 296-2864 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6401 State Route 14 · (330) 297-1493

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.8%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
90.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 90.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.6%CMS range 45.1–72.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.4–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge90.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
61.2%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 56.3 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-01)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were implemented in a timely manner and/or completed as ordered. Actual Harm occurred on 02/04/25 when Resident #17, who was a paraplegic and was dependent on staff assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL) including transfers, and rolling left and right in bed, was found to have an in-house acquired Stage II pressure ulcer (partial- thickness skin loss appearing as a shallow area with a red or pink wound bed) to his sacrum (located at the base of the spine) that measured 3.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 1.9 cm in width by 0.2 cm in depth. The facility failed to implement the treatment as ordered on 02/04/25 of Medi Honey (a brand of medical-grade honey-based product used for wound management) and silicone bordered foam dressing daily until 02/07/25. Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #900 consulted on 02/11/25 and noted a significant decline to Resident #17's sacrum pressure ulcer as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed record review, review of facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #70's change of condition was identified and addressed timely. Actual Harm occurred on 02/10/23 when nursing staff failed to timely evaluate and provide intervention for an acute change in Resident #70's condition. On 02/10/23 in the A.M., therapy staff found Resident #70 to be very lethargic, hard to arouse, and profusely sweating. However, the physician and/or nurse practitioner was not notified until 02/10/23 at 8:13 P.M. of the resident's change in condition. On 02/10/23 at 8:13 P.M. Resident #70's blood pressure was 86/54 (hypotensive) and he was transported to the local Emergency Department via EMS (Emergency Medical Services). The resident was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses of sepsis and acute kidney injury. This affected one resident (Resident #70) of three resident's reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/08/23 and a discharge date of 02/10/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain its garbage disposal area in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents. Findings include: On 03/31/25 at 3:05 PM observation of the facility's garbage disposal area with Dietary Manager (DM) #305 revealed the top lids and side doors to both dumpsters were open and garbage was overflowing. This was confirmed by DM #305 at the time of the observation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, job description review, and interview, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of undated facility Job Description for the Administrator revealed the primary purpose was to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities to ensure that the highest degree of quality care was always provided to the residents. They were to develop and maintain written job descriptions for each staff position. The description revealed they would ensure that all residents receive care in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced their quality of life and ensure that each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin was dated when opened and medications were not left unattended at bedside. This affected three Residents (#2, #44, and #52) out of eight residents who resided on the Blue unit with insulin orders, and one resident (Resident #32) of one resident observed for unsecured medications. Findings included: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 09/29/23 and diagnoses included diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. Review of care plan dated 10/27/23 revealed Resident #52 had a potential risk for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia due to diabetes. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, obtain blood sugar levels as orders and be alert to signs of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. There was nothing in the care plan regarding properly labeling and dating insulin when opened. Review of Medicare Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have an effective antibiotic stewardship program that monitored antibiotic use including reducing the risk of adverse effects of the development of antibiotic- resistant organisms from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. This affected 21 residents (#5, #11, #16, #18, #19, #20, #23, #27, #28, #35, #47, #50, #51, #53, #54, #55, #56, #60, #68, #73, and #233) of 21 residents identified as ordered antibiotics during the months of February 2025 and March 2025 that did not meet McGreer's criteria (infection surveillance definitions for long term facilities for antibiotic use). The facility census was 73. Findings included: Review of Infection Log- ATB (antibiotic) Surveillance dated February 2025 and March 2025 revealed the facility tracked residents that had received antibiotics for these months. The form included room number, resident's name, admission date, in-house onset date, site of infection, diagnostic testing, organism, McGreer's criteria met or not met, anti-microbial agent, route,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was a signed advance directive/Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form in Resident #17's medical record. This affected one resident (#17) out of one resident reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, diabetes, pressure ulcer to sacral region, and congestive heart failure. Review of the [DATE] physician's orders revealed Resident #17 had an order dated [DATE] for a code status of DNR Comfort Care-Arrest. Review of the undated DNR Comfort Care form in the medical record revealed it was unsigned by a physician, Physician Assistant (PA) and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP). The form revealed the box next to DNR Comfort Care Arrest was marked. The form indicated that the signature of a physician, PA, and NP was required. Observation on [DATE] at 10:03 A.M. of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report two incidents of resident elopement to the state agency. This affected two residents (#16 and #56) of two residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 07/10/14. Diagnoses included colon cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, depression, muscle weakness and macular degeneration. Review of the care plan dated 09/23/21 revealed Resident #16 was a high risk for elopement and had exited the facility on 07/01/19. Interventions included applying and maintaining a Wander Guard (a wander management system to alert staff when a resident attempts to exit a designated area), checking the device for proper function, developing an activity program to divert Resident #16's attention and meet his individual needs and redirecting the resident to a safer area if he began wandering. The care plan was resolved on 08/18/21, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two incidents of resident elopement. This affected two residents (#16 and #56) of two residents reviewed for neglect. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 07/10/14. Diagnoses included colon cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, depression, muscle weakness and macular degeneration. Review of the care plan dated 09/23/21 revealed Resident #16 was a high risk for elopement and had exited the facility on 07/01/19. Interventions included applying and maintaining a Wander Guard (a wander management system to alert staff when a resident attempts to exit a designated area), checking the device for proper function, developing an activity program to divert Resident #16's attention and meet his individual needs and redirecting the resident to a safer area if he began wandering. The care plan was resolved on 08/18/21, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive. This affected two residents (Residents #12 and #229) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans and had the potential to affect all 73 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed and admission date of 05/08/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, sleep apnea, glaucoma and depression. Review the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. She required setup help for eating, oral and personal hygiene, supervision for toileting and partial to moderate assistance for showering. Review of the physicians' orders from March 2025 revealed an order for Acetaminophen 1000 milligrams (mg) (analgesic) three times a day for pain, and 325 mg every four hours as needed for pain. There was also in order for oxycodone 7.5 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied as ordered and per therapy recommendations. This affected two residents (#1 and #47) out of two residents reviewed for splints. This had the potential to affect seven residents (#1, #34, #37, #47, #49, #54, and #72) that were identified by the facility with an order for a splint. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 06/09/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following intracranial hemorrhage affecting left non-dominant side, and hypertension. Review of the care plan dated 07/18/24 revealed Resident #47 had the potential for complications related to cerebral vascular accident as evidence by cognitive impairment, decline in activities of daily living (ADL) abilities and left non-dominant side hemiparesis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent elopements for Residents #16 and #56. This affected two residents (#16 and #56) of six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 07/10/14. Diagnoses included colon cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, depression, muscle weakness and macular degeneration. Review of the care plan dated 09/23/21 revealed Resident #16 was a high risk for elopement and had exited the facility on 07/01/19. Interventions included applying and maintaining a Wander Guard (a wander management system to alert staff when a resident attempts to exit a designated area), checking the device for proper function, developing an activity program to divert Resident #16's attention and meet his individual needs and redirecting the resident to a safer area if he began wandering. The care plan was resolved on 08/18/21, and reimplemented 09/05/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to obtain weights according to Dietician recommendations for Resident #47. This affected one Resident (#47) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 73. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 06/09/24 and her diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, diabetes, hypertension and presence of gastrostomy tube (tube inserted into the stomach to provide means of feeding and medication). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had impaired cognition, and she had a feeding tube with weight loss that was not prescribed. Review of the care plan last revised 02/13/25 revealed Resident #47 was at risk for malnutrition related to underweight, dysphagia, nothing by mouth, feeding tube, pressure wounds, and significant weight change. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility did not ensure there was proper signage indicating oxygen was in use. This affected three Residents (#2, #18, and #26) out of four residents reviewed for oxygen use. This had the potential to affect 21 Residents (#6, #7, #12, #13, #17, #20 #26, #27, #29, #35, #44, #45, #51, #53, #54, #59, #62, #63, #229, #232, and #237) that were identified by the facility as having oxygen. The facility census was 73. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 02/23/16 and diagnoses included bipolar disorder, diabetes, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition and was not on oxygen. Review of the March 2025 physician orders for Resident #2 revealed he had no orders for oxygen. Observation on 03/24/25 at 11:30 A.M. revealed in Resident #2's room there was a Broda chair (a chair that reclines…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering as needed pain medication and failed to ensure parameters were in place for when to administer of Acetaminophen versus opioid pain medication. This affected two residents (#12 and #21) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed and admission date of 05/08/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, sleep apnea, glaucoma and depression. Review the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. She required setup help for eating, oral and personal hygiene, supervision for toileting and partial to moderate assistance for showering. Review of the physicians' orders from March 2025 revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of laboratory results for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for laboratory results. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed and admission date of 05/08/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, sleep apnea, glaucoma and depression. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed a urinalysis was obtained on 08/27/24 which showed evidence of nitrites, epithelial cells, bacteria, hyaline casts, mucous and white blood cell clumps. There was no evidence that the physician was notified of the results of the urinalysis. Interview on 03/26/25 at 9:21 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #322 confirmed there was no documented evidence the laboratory results were reported to the physician for Resident #12. Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Changes dated 01/01/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) nursing standard of practice for medication administration, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications to Resident #7 and Resident #69 according to professional standards of practice. This affected two out of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Resident # 7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, glaucoma, benign heart neoplasm, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with pulmonary embolism, high blood pressure, transient ischemic attack (TIA), anemia, kidney disease, osteoarthritis, obesity, vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, and neuropathy. Resident #7's physician orders dated [DATE] to [DATE] indicated to administer the following medications upon rising: - Eliquis 2.5 mg tablet - furosemide 40 milligrams (mg) tablet - metoprolol 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment when providing direct care for Resident #60. This affected one out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, coronary artery disease, cancer, heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and high cholesterol. Review of Resident #60's plan of care revised 12/13/24 indicated a potential for complications related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Intervention on the plan of care indicated to implement enhanced barrier precautions. Review of Resident #60's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the presence of a stage three pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not fat may be exposed. Slough may be present but does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable water temperatures for residents. This had the potential to affect nine residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #9, Resident #24, Resident #36, Resident #48, Resident #49, Resident #56 and Resident #61) residing on [NAME] Hall. The census was 71. Findings include: Observation on 01/07/25 at 11:16 A.M. of the water temperature in the shower room on [NAME] Hall revealed a shower temperature of 90.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F) after the water was running for seven minutes. The water temperature of the sink started at 101 degrees F but went down to 99 degrees F after running for 3 minutes. Interview on 01/07/25 at 11:16 A.M. with Maintenance Director #225 revealed the temperature should be between 110 to 120 degrees F. He stated he had to adjust it weekly based on colder or hotter weather temperatures. Review of a list of residents residing on [NAME] Hall revealed Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #9, Resident #24, Resident #36, Resident #48, Resident #49, Resident #56 and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to deliver all resident mail and personal packages to them unopened. This affected two residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #24) and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 07/20/23 and a transfer to hospital date of 08/08/24. Diagnosis included respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid severe obesity due to excessive calories, atrial fibrillation, and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed Resident # #1 was cognitively intact. Resident #1 used a wheelchair for mobility. Phone interview on 08/19/24 at 2:22 P.M. with Resident #1 revealed while she was at the facility, she received mail and packages delivered by the staff that were opened without her permission prior to her receiving them. Interview on 08/19/24 at 2:34 P.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assure one resident, Resident #5 received routine showers/baths per the resident preference and the facility schedule. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 01/02/24. Diagnosis included autistic disorder, morbid obesity, and malignant neuroleptic syndrome. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #5 had no impairment of the upper or lower extremities, used a wheelchair for mobility, required set up or clean up assist for meals and was dependent for showers. Review of the care plan dated 01/22/24 for Resident #5 revealed assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADL) related to cognitive impairment, impaired mobility, Autism, and intellectual disability. The resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely report and address a Resident #21's change in skin condition. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: Record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/31/19. Diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder, HIV, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the physician orders for Resident #21 revealed an order dated 10/17/22 to apply zinc oxide cream to bilateral buttocks every shift and as needed for skin integrity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was rarely or never understood. Resident #21 had no impairment in functional limitations in range of motion to the upper or lower extremities, Resident #21 was dependent for personal hygiene. Resident #21 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident # received applications of ointments. Resident #21 required supervision or touch assist with walking 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21, who had a history of Alzheimer's disease, had proper interventions in place to prevent consumption of poisonous substances. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/31/19. Diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was rarely or never understood. Resident #21 had no impairment in functional limitations in range of motion to the upper or lower extremities, Resident #21 required set up or clean up assist with eating and was dependent for personal hygiene. Resident #21 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #21 received applications of ointments. Resident #21 required supervision or touch assist with walking 10 feet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from significant medication error. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 07/20/23 and a transfer to hospital date of 08/08/24. Diagnosis included respiratory failure with hypoxia and atrial fibrillation. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders for Resident #1 dated 07/08/24 revealed an order for Midodrine (used to increase blood pressure) hcl 10 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth three times a day for blood pressure, hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 120. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #1 for 07/08/24 through 08/07/24 revealed Resident #1's blood pressure was monitored prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 had physician's orders and parameters for continuous oxygen administration via nasal cannula. This affected one resident (Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/08/23 and a discharge date of 02/10/23. Resident #70's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the right dominant side, obstructive sleep apnea and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #70's admission Assessment with Baseline Care Plan dated 02/08/23 included Resident #70 was admitted from the hospital, had the cognitive ability to be oriented to his room, surroundings and was oriented to room, call bell, bed controls and side rails. Resident #70 was alert to person and situation and had clear verbal communication. Resident #70 was non ambulatory. Review of Resident #70's physician orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy ,the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/08/23 and a discharge date of 02/10/23. Resident #70's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the right dominant side, obstructive sleep apnea and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #70's Gold Form Provider Orders dated 02/08/23 included an admitting diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) and additional diagnoses included calf DVT (deep venous thrombosis), and presence of inferior vena cava filter. Review of Resident #70's hospital information Patient Care Summary for Transfer dated 02/08/23 at 10:51 A.M. included Heparin Sodium 5000 units subcutaneous every 8 hours was given at on 02/08/23 at 6:17 A.M. and the next dose was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure Resident #60 did not leave the facility unattended. This affected one resident (#60) of three reviewed for supervision. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical records revealed an admission date of 08/16/21. Diagnoses included dementia and cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #60's care plan dated 08/17/22 revealed the resident had an episode of anxiety related to being on the secured unit and was noted to have been beating on the door and was exit seeking. Exit seeking behaviors were also noted to have occurred when the resident believed it was time to smoke. Interventions included place a clock in resident's room to remind him of the smoking times. The care plan also indicated Resident #60 had a diagnosis of dementia that required resident to be placed on the secured unit. Interventions included review on a quarterly basis for continued placement on the secured unit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care had been provided. This affected three residents (#37, #49 and #52) of four observed for incontinence care. The facility identified 44 incontinent residents. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/20/21. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, falls, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #37's care plan dated 09/12/22 revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included provide incontinence care every two hours and as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with toileting, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #49's medical records revealed an admission date of 11/18/21. Diagnoses included cognitive deficits, dementia and aphasia (difficulty speaking). Review of MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure supplements were administered as ordered. This affected two (Residents #5 and #62) of four residents reviewed for nutrition and weight loss. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, difficulty in walking and dysphagia. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/23/22 for Boost plus eight ounces three times a day for nutrition support and wound healing. Review of Resident #5's medication administration records (MARS) from 10/28/22 to 11/02/22 revealed the Boost plus was not administered on 10/28/22 for lunch, 10/28/22 for dinner, 10/29/22 for breakfast, 10/29/22 for lunch, 10/30/22 for breakfast, 10/30/22 for lunch, 10/31/22 for lunch and 10/31/22 for dinner. Interview on 11/02/22 at 7:35 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #818 revealed the facility ran out of Boost plus on 08/28/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing on the memory care unit. This affected three residents (#37, #49 and #52) residing on the memory care unit. The memory care census was 10. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/20/21. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, falls, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #37's care plan dated 09/12/22 revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included provide incontinence care every two hours and as needed. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with toileting, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #49's medical records revealed an admission date of 11/18/21. Diagnoses included cognitive deficits, dementia and aphasia (difficulty speaking). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store food in the dry storage room and in the walk-in freezer in a sanitary manner. The facility also failed to store pans and pitchers in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents who currently resided in the facility and ate food prepared in the kitchen. Finding include: On 08/05/19 the following observations were made in the facility kitchen: At 9:10 A.M., the [NAME] Beach stainless steel blender was observed on a food preparation counter across from the steam table. Upon removal of the lid, the blender pitcher had water in the pitcher. The dietary manager (DM) stated the blender had been used the evening before to puree desserts. When asked if the blender pitcher was supposed to be stored wet, the DM stated, No. At 9:13 A.M., in the dry storage room, a bag of bleached flour was observed to be open and exposed. The DM stated, It should be sealed. Also, a bag of crispy onions was open and exposed. When shown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all staff, including medical providers, treated two residents (Resitens #5, and #9) with dignity when entering their rooms and during care. This affected two of 14 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: 1. On 08/05/19 at 9:50 A.M. a physician (who was later identified as the Medical Director) was observed entering the room of Resident #5, which had the door closed, without knocking or announcing himself. Two state tested nursing assistants (STNA) were observed in the room providing personal care to the resident. The physician did not ask permission to enter upon opening the door. During an interview on 08/05/19 at 10:00 A.M., Resident #5 stated the physician never knocks on our door, he just walks in and further stated other staff in the building do knock before they come in. On 08/05/19 at 11:30 A.M. the Medical Director approached the surveyor and stated, I have never been instructed by the former director [administrator] at the facility about knocking on doors and that he had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure physical examinations and discussion of private health information for two residents (Residents #7 and #9) were conducted privately. This affected two of 14 residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: 1. Observation revealed, on 08/05/19 at 10:12 A.M. a male, who was later identified as the Medical Director, walked in Resident #9's room while the resident was speaking with the surveyor. The gentleman walked in without knocking or asking permission to enter, interrupting the surveyor interview with Resident #9. The gentleman then began to discuss Resident #9's care in front of the surveyor and leaned down and placed a stethoscope on the resident's chest, to listen to her heart and lungs. The surveyor exited the room at that time. Brief interview with the Administrator at 10:30 A.M. on 08/05/19 revealed the gentleman was the Medical Director and one of three attending physicians seeing residents in the facility. On 08/06/19 at 9:35 A.M. an interview with Resident #9, about the previous day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure urinary output was tracked as ordered for one resident (Resident #37) with an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, (an assessment tool completed by the facility staff used to identify resident care problems and assist with care planning) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD), the end-point of the evaluation period, of 01/10/19, revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/03/19 with diagnoses of spina bifida, generalized muscle weakness, neuro muscular dysfunction of the bladder, essential (primary) hypertension, and three pressure ulcers. In addition, the MDS Assessment indicated under Section V Care Area Assessment section, the resident was admitted with urinary incontinence and an indwelling catheter/urinary ostomy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from medications used without adequate indication, for one resident (Resident #6). This affected one of of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 66. Findings include: According to the facility Face Sheet (undated), Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet revealed diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, overactive bladder, and generalized muscle weakness. No diagnosis of a history of urinary tract infections (UTI) was found in the clinical record. No documentation was found that Resident #6 had a urology consult or was seen by a urologist. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD), the end-point of the evaluation period, of 05/10/19, revealed Resident #6, in Section C, which assessed the resident's cognitive status, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5. A score of 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for one (Resident #9) regarding diagnoses that were actually associated with another resident in the facility. This affected one of 19 sampled resident whose records were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's Face Sheet, from the Demographics Tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. Her Diagnosis Report, from the Diagnoses tab of the EMR revealed admitting diagnoses included diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder (recurrent), and sleep apnea. Diagnoses of schizophrenia and cerebral palsy were added to the diagnosis list on 03/30/18. On 01/22/18 her attending physician, who was also the Medical Director, wrote two Physician Progress Notes, in the Progress Note tab of the EMR. The notes timed at 2305 (11:05 P.M.) documented Resident #9 had a Past Medical History…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$47,486 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $47,486 — penalty dated 2025-04-01
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-23 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Crystal Care Center Of AshlandAshland, OH 1 of 5Embassy Of East MountainWilkes Barre, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of HearthsideState College, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of SaxonburgSaxonburg, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of ScrantonScranton, PA 1 of 5Embassy Of TunkhannockTunkhannock, PA 1 of 5Heritage Healthcare of LyndhurstLyndhurst, OH 2 of 5Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab CenterRittman, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of CambridgeCambridge, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Huntingdon ParkHuntingdon, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WinchesterCanal Winchester, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Woodland ParkOrbisonia, PA 2 of 5Embassy Of WoodviewColumbus, OH 2 of 5Embassy Of Wyoming ValleyWilkes Barre, PA 2 of 5Forest Hills CenterColumbus, OH 2 of 5Grande OaksOakwood Village, OH 2 of 5Heritage Health Care CenterOakwood Village, OH 3 of 5Clepper ManorSharon, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of Hillsdale ParkHillsdale, PA 3 of 5Embassy Of LoganLogan, OH 3 of 5Embassy Of WillardWillard, OH 3 of 5Hermitage Nursing And RehabilitationHermitage, PA 3 of 5Madison Health CareMadison, OH 3 of 5Oak Hills Nursing CenterLorain, OH 3 of 5Parkside Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFairfield, OH 3 of 5Pickerington Care And RehabilitationPickerington, OH 3 of 5Royal Oak Nursing & Rehab CtrMiddleburg Heights, OH 3 of 5Seasons Nursing And RehabStow, OH 4 of 5Carlisle Manor Health Care INCCarlisle, OH 4 of 5Embassy Of Park AvenueMeadville, PA 4 of 5Embassy Of SwantonSwanton, OH 5 of 5Embassy Of Valley ViewFrankfort, OH

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHRISTIAN HEALTH NETWORK II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 11/01/2014
HOFFMAN, JILLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2015
HANDLER, AARONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 18%Medicare 4%Other / private 78%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$342per resident / day
operating cost
$10,400per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$373per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365354. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next