Autumnwood Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 52.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on closed medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of facility policy, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 was free from physical restraints. Actual Harm occurred on 03/08/25 at approximately 7:00 A.M. when Resident #52 was physically restrained and tied to his wheelchair with a bed sheet by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #526 in an attempt to address Resident #52's behaviors and to prevent Resident #52 from standing from the chair. Resident #52 was found by visiting Hospice LPN #603 tied to his wheelchair with a bed sheet knotted behind him. The resident was unattended, seated in his wheelchair, agitated, and reported a pain rating of a 10 on a one-to-ten scale (with ten indicating the worst possible pain). Other interventions in place and available at the time of the incident, including as-needed (PRN) medications for pain, anxiety, and agitation, were not utilized by the nurse prior to Resident #52 being restrained. Hospice LPN #603 released Resident #52's restraint and hospice staff stayed one-on-one with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safety measures and interventions were implemented to prevent potential accidents and hazards. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #21 on 02/01/25 when the facility failed to ensure Resident #21's smoking apron was in place during smoking and Resident #21 sustained a burn from his cigarette dropping on his right thigh. The burn had full thickness tissue loss with 100 percent (%) slough (dead tissue) in the wound bed, and required debridement. This affected three residents (#21, #28 and #47) and had the potential to affect an additional five additional residents, Residents #3, #33, #40, #42, and #303 who were identified by the facility as being independently mobile, cognitively impaired and able to reach the unsecured box with cigarettes and lighters. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #21 revealed a readmission date of 07/23/23 with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, and the facility submitted Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) tracking information, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report form submitted from 07/01/24 through 09/30/24 revealed the following dates submitted for the third quarter of the fiscal year 2024, the facility was low on RN hours in the building on the seven following dates: 07/26/25, 07/31/25, 08/01/25, 08/05/25, 08/10/25, 08/11/25, and 08/28/25. Interview on 05/14/25 at 9:08 A.M. with the Administrator revealed he started in June 2024 and was told there was a concern with getting RNs hired. The Administrator stated they hired RNs and should be okay now. Review of the schedules and assignment sheets from 07/01/24 through 09/30/24 with Human…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and observation of a test tray, the facility failed to serve foods at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the diet order listing report revealed there were no residents with orders for nothing by mouth (NPO) and all 54 residents had oral diet orders in place. On 05/12/25 at 8:13 A.M., an interview with Resident #36 stated the food was awful. On 05/12/25 at 10:31 A.M., an interview with Resident #25 stated the food was cold. On 05/12/25 at 11:40 A.M., an interview with Resident #153 stated the food was horrible. On 05/14/25 from 10:49 A.M. to 12:12 P.M., an observation of the tray line for lunch service and review of a test tray with Dietary Manager (DM) #525 revealed the following: at 11:52 A.M., the test tray was plated on the line; at 11:56 A.M., the test tray was put on the delivery cart and the delivery cart left the kitchen immediately after; at 11:57 A.M., the cart was delivered to the unit; from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, observations, review of chemical sanitizer directions for use, and review of dishwasher manufacturer's directions, the facility failed to properly sanitize dishware after washing, discard expired foods in a timely manner, and maintain food storage areas in a clean manner. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing at the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the diet order listing report revealed there were no residents with orders for nothing by mouth (NPO) and all 54 residents had oral diet orders in place. Review of an email dated 04/21/25 at 7:52 A.M., between the facility and the chemical company who maintains their dish machine, indicated the Administrator had spent a week to verify there was no lease on the dish machine and that the facility needed someone out as soon as possible to resolve the temperature issues. An email, dated 04/21/25 at 8:15 A.M. requested an expedited process because this has been a problem for a while. An email dated 04/21/25 at 9:36 A.M. requested someone come to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 04/25/10 and a readmission date of 03/23/20 with diagnoses to include but not limited to heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact and was independent for activities of daily living. An interview on 05/12/25 at 11:08 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed that the heater in his room did not work. Observation during a tour of the facility with the Director of Maintenance (DM) #502 on 05/12/25 at 11:19 A.M. revealed the air temperature in Resident #2's room was 69 degrees F. DM #502 verified the air temperature at the time of observation. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly assess the needs of its resident population by accurately evaluating residents with diseases, conditions, and physical and behavioral health needs to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently. This had the potential to affect 37 residents (Residents #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #14, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #30, #32, #34, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #42, #44, #45, #47, #48, #152, #153, #303, and #304) who resided in the facility at time of entrance and had a psychiatric and/or mood diagnosis. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed no residents were identified with psychiatric and/or mood disorder diagnoses. Staffing was identified as being adequate for caring for residents with dementia, mental health conditions, needed because behavioral health services or history of trauma as evidenced by the facility noted it was not applicable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel files, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff received behavior health training. This had the potential to affect 37 residents (Residents #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #14, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #30, #32, #34, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #42, #44, #45, #47, #48, #152, #153, #303, and #304) who resided in the facility at time of entrance and had a psychiatric and/or mood diagnosis. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #526 revealed a hire date of 10/19/21. The file contained no evidence that LPN #526 received training on mental health behaviors. Review of the personnel file for LPN #553 revealed a hire date of 04/16/25. The file contained no evidence that LPN #553 received training on mental health behaviors. Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #531 revealed a hire date of 12/12/19. The file contained no evidence that CNA #531 received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure equipment used for residents' activities of daily living (ADLs) were maintained in good working condition. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident reviewed for equipment and had the potential to affect one additional resident (#8) who utilized a shower bed for bathing. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed a readmission date of 11/23/22. Diagnosis included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF) and morbid severe obesity. Review of the care plan dated 07/19/24 revealed Resident #26 required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included Resident #26 was totally dependent and does not participate in any aspect of the task for bathing. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Resident #26 had an impairment to both sides of the lower extremities and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had accurate advance directive orders and information in place throughout the medical record for Resident #45. This affected one resident (#45) of 34 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #45 revealed an order dated 02/28/25 for a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) code status (meaning invasive or extreme life-supporting measures were allowed under any circumstance except for cardiac or respiratory arrest. In the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest only comfort measures would be initiated). Review of the plan of care dated 03/04/25 for Resident #45 revealed the resident was a DNRCCA. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) as required. This affected one resident (#47) of two residents reviewed for reporting abuse, neglect, misappropriation or injuries of unknown origin. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 01/21/25. On 03/26/25 Resident #47 was transferred to the Hospital #604 and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included severe protein calorie malnutrition, altered mental status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and weakness. Review of Hospital #604's discharge record dated 04/04/25 completed by Physician #605 included Resident #47 was admitted to Hospital #604 on 03/27/25. Documentation included the wound to the left lateral back was healed. Review of the admission Progress note dated 04/05/25 at 12:57 A.M. completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #538 revealed Resident #47 returned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Certification and Licensure System (CALS), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of potential abuse for two residents (#47 and #52) of two residents reviewed for investigations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or injuries of unknown origin. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 01/21/25. On 03/26/25 Resident #47 was transferred to the Hospital #604 and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included severe protein calorie malnutrition, altered mental status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and weakness. Review of Hospital #604's discharge record dated 04/04/25 completed by Physician #605 included Resident #47 was admitted to Hospital #604 on 03/27/25. Documentation included the wound to the left lateral back healed. Review of the admission Progress note dated 04/05/25 at 12:57 A.M. completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-21 for 32 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $288K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH