Heritage Healthcare of Lyndhurst
1575 Brainard Rd, Lyndhurst, OH 44124 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (440) 460-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $149,620 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-07)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 29.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.0% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.8% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 92.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, review of hospice notes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to facilitate resident preference, comfort and hydration. Actual Harm occurred on 03/24/25 at 10:04 A.M. when Resident #58, a resident who was receiving end-of-life hospice care who staff believed was actively dying, was left alone behind a closed door, thirsty, in severe pain, and unable to call for assistance. Resident #58 was dependent on all aspects of care and unable to call for help, was denied hydration measures, and had minimal pain control for 2 days. This affected one resident (#58) of three residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 81. Findings include Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/20/24. Medical diagnoses included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (a progressive disease that specifically affects motor neurons responsible for controlling muscle movement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility fall investigation, review of staff disciplinary forms, review of a facility procedure and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance to Resident #35 during incontinence care to prevent a fall with injury. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 68. Actual harm occurred on 08/05/24 when Resident #35, who was severely cognitively impaired, required two staff assistance for bed mobility and was incontinent, sustained a fall out of bed when staff were providing incontinence care. At the time of the incident, the staff failed to maintain the resident's safety in bed. The resident exhibited pain to the left side of the head with swelling and bruising to the left cheek and eye and pain with range of motion to the left elbow. Resident #35 was transferred to the hospital and returned with a diagnosis of a head injury and multiple contusions. Findings include: Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of a facility fall investigation, hospital record review, facility policy and procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident #06 with necessary and an appropriate level of assistance with bed mobility during incontinence care resulting in the resident falling out of bed. In addition, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the fall to determine the root cause to identify potential hazards to reduce and/or eliminate falls with major injury. Actual Harm occurred on 08/28/23 when State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #400 was providing incontinence care to Resident #06 without the appropriate level of assistance, the resident rolled out of bed and fell to the floor. Following the incident, the resident was transported to the hospital and diagnosed with a right distal femur fracture which required surgical intervention. This affected one resident (#06) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview with the Administrator, the facility failed to provide a complete and detailed Facility Assessment. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Enhanced Facility Assessment, reviewed and updated on 10/01/24 by the Administrator revealed the facility assessment did not identify all the personnel involved in the writing and approval process of the plan, the average census was not accurate, the average number of residents admitted and discharged in a day were not accurate, it did not include common diagnoses the facility admits, what kind of services or care offered, or details regarding staffing levels on each shift. Interview on 03/31/25 at 1:32 P.M. with the Administrator revealed she understood and agreed with the above discrepancies.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide hygiene and grooming as scheduled and as needed for three residents (#13, #28, and #60) of three residents reviewed for hygiene. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1.Record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 03/08/20. Diagnosis included cerebral infarction, muscle wasting and atrophy, and muscle weakness. Review of the Modification of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Resident #13 had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities, dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, and substantial/maximal assistants for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #13 dated 07/24/24 revealed Resident #13 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Resident #13 requires assistance with ADLs. Interventions included to assist with activities of daily living (i.e.: dressing, grooming,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals compatible with their likes and dislikes. This affected one resident (Resident #22) and had the potential to affect 76 of 81 residents receiving food from the kitchen as five residents (Resident #17, #35, #44, #52, and #62) received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 09/02/16. Diagnosis included chronic kidney disease, gout, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact. Resident #22's preferences were very important to him. Review of the care plan dated 03/06/25 revealed Resident (#22) is at risk for altered nutritional status related to: Diuretic use, abnormal labs, obesity, therapeutic diet needs, edema and weight changes. Interventions included to provide meals / snacks / fluids based on resident food preferences and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to offer the flu and or pneumonia vaccine for all residents. This affected four residents (Resident #9, #10, #13, and #21) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 04/02/14. Diagnosis included functional quadriplegia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Review of the immunization record for Resident #21 revealed the flu nor the pneumonia vaccine was neither offered nor refused for 2024 or 2025. Record review revealed no contraindication to the flu or pneumococcal vaccine. Interview and record review on 03/31/25 at 1:05 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the flu nor the pneumococcal vaccine was neither offered nor refused for 2024 or 2025 for Resident #21.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's request to go to bed and receive timely care was respected and the resident was timely assisted in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 01/21/21. Diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, lymphedema, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and acquired absence of right leg below knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly dated 01/28/25 revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition, was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting hygiene, was frequently incontinent of bladder, and always incontinent of bowel. Interview on 03/24/25 at 12:05 P.M. with Resident #28 revealed a few Fridays ago, he did not get put to bed due to short staffing on the night shift. Resident #28 stated by 5:00 A.M. (on 03/15/25) he still had not been put to bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal property in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#40) of one resident reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 01/20/25. Diagnoses included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary hypertension due to lung diseases and hypoxia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the care conference review dated 01/24/25 revealed Social Worker (SW) #234, Nurse Manager (NM) #261, rehab representative, and Resident #40 attended. Under the summarization of discussion of care plan revealed: care meeting schedule with the resident on 01/24/25. Resident #40 has no family or friends to attend the meeting. Social services went over services and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 01/29/25. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and transfers. Observation on 03/24/25 at 11:05 A.M revealed Resident #5 was lying in bed and his left arm was constricted. The call light was wrapped around the right-side bed rail. Interview at this time with Resident #5 stated he was unable to reach his call light. Interview on 03/24/25 at 11:10 A.M. with Housekeeper #242 verified the call light was not within reach for Resident #5. Review of the facility policy titled Call system, Resident dated September 2022 stated each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting, bathing facilities and from the floor. This deficiency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to respect and promote resident self-determination. This affected two resident (#9 and #60) of three residents reviewed for the ability for residents to choose important facets of their lives. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1.Record review for Resident #9 revealed a readmission date of [DATE]. Diagnosis included paraplegia, incomplete, anxiety disorder, and weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #9 revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Resident #9 had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities and used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #9 required partial/moderate assistants for bed mobility and dependent for transfers to and from the wheelchair. Vision was adequate with corrective lenses. Review of the care plan for Resident #9 dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was at risk for impaired psychiatric/mood status related to diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a completed code status form was completed for Resident #40. This affected one resident (#40) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 01/20/25. Diagnoses included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary hypertension due to lung diseases and hypoxia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the physician orders for March 2025 revealed Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) with a start date of 01/23/25. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had intact cognition, had no behaviors, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Interview on 03/25/25 at 2:19 P.M. with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure notification of significant weight loss to the resident's physician and/or the resident representative. This affected one resident (#45) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition and one resident (#35) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 05/03/17. Diagnoses included dementia, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, gastrostomy status, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the weight history for Resident #35 revealed: • 02/03/25 weight was 134 pounds • 02/20/25 weight was 137 pounds • 02/27/25 weight was 130 pounds • 03/12/25 weight was 130.5 pounds Review of the progress note dated 03/06/25 at 10:07 A.M. revealed a nutrition noted stating Resident #35's weights were reviewed. Resident #35 showed a weight loss on the last weight after a previous weight gain. Resident #35 was on weekly weights to monitor, awaiting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letters and staff interview, the facility failed to provide residents with the correct last covered day (LCD). This affected five (Resident #60, Resident #63, Resident #73, Resident #79, and Resident #80) of eleven residents reviewed for liability notices. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was still a resident and had not been discharged . A NOMNC letter revealed skilled services ended on 02/15/25, the LCD. The medical record provided no evidence of Resident #60's next payor source starting on 02/16/25. 2. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was still a resident and had not been discharged . A NOMNC letter revealed skilled services ended on 11/23/24, the LCD. The medical record provided no evidence of Resident #63's next payor source starting on 11/24/24. 3. Review of Resident #73's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 01/29/25. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and transfers. Observation on 03/24/25 at 11:05 A.M, revealed Resident #5 was lying in bed. The resident had a floor mat to the right side of the bed. The mat was covered with a dried white substance. The carpeted next to the mat had large areas with a dried white substance. Interview 03/24/25 at 11:10 A.M. with Housekeeper #242 verified the dirty floor mat and spillage on the carpet. Housekeeper #242 stated she did not get to clean Resident #5 room today. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00163018. Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care plan meetings were offered/completed for Resident #13. This affected one resident (#13) of one resident reviewed for quarterly care plan timing. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 03/08/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obstructive and reflux uropathy, resistant to multiple antimicrobial drugs, constipation, and muscle weakness. Review of the modification of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Resident #13 had impairment on both sides of her lower extremities, required partial/moderate assistance with eating and was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers, and required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. Resident #13 had an indwelling catheter and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 03/06/25. Diagnoses included sepsis, osteomyelitis, heart failure, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the laboratory service report dated 03/06/25 at 10:11 A.M. revealed the urine culture resulted Escherichia coli and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing organism. The report revealed the organism was resistant to ciprofloxacin and sensitive to Macrobid. Review of the admitting medications reconciliation dated 03/06/25 revealed ciprofloxacin 250 milligram (mg) twice daily was crossed off not to be administered. Review of Resident #42's physician orders dated 03/06/25 at 6:13 P.M. revealed an order dated 03/08/25 for Macrobid 100 milligrams, an antibiotic, two times a day to treat urinary tract infection. Review of the nursing progress note dated 03/08/25 stated Macrobid oral capsule 100 mg by mouth two a day for Urinary tract infection (URI) was not available. Review of the starter kit replacement form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to apply Resident #179's Automatic Positive Airway Pressure (auto-PAP) machine as ordered. This affected one resident (#179) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 81. Finding include: Review of Resident #179's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, and emphysema. Resident #179 was discharged on 02/21/25. Review of the physicians order for February 2025 revealed an order for an auto-PAP (a respiratory machine worn while sleeping which provides positive airway pressure and automatically adjusts in response to measured airway resistance) to be applied every night and as needed for naps. Review of the Treatment Record (TAR) for February 2025 revealed the treatment was signed off on for evening on 02/19/25 and 02/20/25. Review of the nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #179 was alert and orientated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 03/06/25. Diagnoses included sepsis, osteomyelitis, heart failure, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 dated 03/12/25 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting, transfers and ambulation. The assessment indicated the resident received and antibiotic and antiplatelet. Review of Resident #42's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/08/25 for Macrobid 100 milligrams (mg), an antibiotic, administered two times a day to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of progress note dated 03/08/25 at 6:30 P.M. revealed a new order was placed for Macrobid 100 mg to be administered twice daily for a duration of ten days to treat a UTI. The note stated the order was outside of the recommended dose or frequency. The dose failed a general dose range check, and the drug's dose should be adjusted based on renal function. The note concluded by noting manual screening was required. Additional review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record. This affected two residents (Resident #42 and #179) of two residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #179's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22 with diagnoses including Respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, and emphysema. Resident #179 was discharged on 02/21/25. Review of the physicians order for February 2025 revealed an order for an auto-pap (auto-adjusted positive airway pressure) to apply as needed for naps and every night. Review of the Treatment Record (TAR) for February 2025 revealed the treatment was signed off on for evening on 02/19/25 and 02/20/25. Review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) 257446 dated 02/21/25 revealed the Nurse Practitioner (NP) reported that staff failed to follow treatment order for Resident #179 auto-pap. The witness statement for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #351 taken by the Administrator per phone stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure proper storage of food items and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and nursing unit refrigerators. This had the potential to affect 76 of 81 residents in the facility as five residents (Resident #17, #35, #44, #52, and #62) received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 03/24/25 from 9:50 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. revealed observation of the walk-in freezer #2 with several boxes of frozen food stored on the floor of the freezer. Dairy walk-in cooler #3 had an opened box of hard boiled eggs in clear plastic bags with one of the clear plastic bags opened and undated, and a clear container with cooked fish with the lid opened. The prep table with the Robocoup had several dried, beige, food splatters and what looked like shredded cheese pieces on table next to the Robocoup. A moderate amount of various food crumbs were observed on bottom shelf of the prep table on the large white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admittance date of 03/13/23 with diagnoses including spinal injury at T7 through T10, paraplegia, spinal stenosis, hypertension, depression, and heart failure. Review of Resident #9's physician orders for March 2025 revealed morning medications that included Allopurinol 100 milligram (mg), 0.6 mg Colchicine 0.6 mg. Furosemide 40 mg, multivitamin, potassium 20 milliequivalents (meq), vitamin B12, Vyvanse 40 mg, Flomax 0.4. and Gabapentin 800 mg. Observation on 03/26/25 at 7:57 A.M. of medication administration with Registered Nurse (RN) #310 revealed the nurse prepared Resident #9's morning medications and administered the medications. There was no hand sanitizer on the medication cart. RN #310 did not sanitize or wash hands prior to preparing medication Resident #9 medications or after administering the medications. Interview on 03/26/25 at 8:40 A.M. with RN #310 verified she did not sanitize or wash her hand prior to administering medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents hazards when smoking materials were not secured to prevent Resident #1 from smoking in his room. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed with a diagnosis of dementia on the locked nursing unit and the 24 (#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24 and #25)additional residents residing on the locked memory care nursing unit. Facility census was 72. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, high blood pressure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, disorder of kidney and ureter, chronic viral hepatitis, malnutrition and traumatic brain injury. A review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1's cognition was intact. A review of Resident #1's hospital record dated 12/16/24 indicated he had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17, who had chronic pain syndrome and received routine and as needed medication to treat pain, was provided pain medication as requested to effectively manage her chronic pain. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 66. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), fibromyalgia, chronic pain syndrome, major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #17 revealed on 02/27/24 the resident was admitted to hospice for the diagnosis of ALS. She was receiving Ambien (a hypnotic medication for sleep) 10 milligrams (mg) between 11:30 P.M. and 12:30 A.M., Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg every four hours as needed, Gabapentin (a medication used to treat nerve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide feeding assist for Residents #5 and #6 and personal care assist with a mechanical lift for Resident #35 in a dignified and respectful manner. This affected three residents (#5, #6 and #35) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/16 with diagnoses including quadriplegia and anxiety disorder. Physician orders effective October 2024 indicated a regular diet, texture and consistency, and to give feeding assistance with all meals as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] specified Resident #5 had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on one staff physical assist for eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 02/20/24 with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, chronic pain syndrome,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facilities self reported incidents (SRIs), medical record review, policy review, family interview, staff interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents responsible parties and medical practioners were notified of an instance of potential sexual abuse. This affected two (Residents #100 and #101) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff persons for completing her activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of census records revealed Resident #100 was her own responsible party but relied on her mother to make all necessary medical and financial decisions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), medical record review, policy review, police report review, family interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 was free from sexual abuse. This affected one of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff persons for completing her activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #100 was discharged to another skilled nursing facility on 07/29/24 Review of the care plan dated 07/19/21 revealed Resident #100 has noted behaviors such as attention seeking, making false accusations of staff and others and rejection of care. The medical record also noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review,staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure it implemented its abuse policy related to an incident of potential sexual abuse against Resident #100. This affected one (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff persons for completing her activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of census records revealed Resident #100 was her own responsible party but relied on her mother to make all necessary medical and financial decisions. Resident #100 was discharged to another skilled nursing facility on 07/29/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs) ,medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for residents. This affected two (Residents #100 and #101) of three residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff persons for completing her activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of census records revealed Resident #100 was her own responsible party but relied on her mother to make all necessary medical and financial decisions. Resident #100 was discharged to another skilled nursing facility on 07/29/24. Resident #101 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen environment including labeling and dating food, discarding expired food and appropriate monitoring of the low-temperature dish machine. This had the potential to affect 53 residents receiving food from the kitchen as four residents (Residents #2, #7, #47 and #54) received nothing-by-mouth (NPO). Facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 04/15/24 from 8:32 A.M. to 9:13 A.M. with District Dietary Manager (DDM) #132 revealed the following areas of concern: • In the walk-in cooler, there were packs of sliced cheese and turkey that lacked labels and dates. There was a loosely wrapped package of hard-boiled eggs that were not labeled or dated. There was an additional package of white cheese slices not dated and sausage that had an illegible date. There was a cut of pork wrapped in foil with writing on the foil indicating it was fully cooked but no date was on the foil. There was a package of corned beef that was opened and not dated. • In the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure trash including biohazardous waste was collected and stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/15/24 starting at 9:13 A.M. with District Dietary Manager (DDM) #132 revealed multiple dumpsters were placed in the parking lot area behind the facility. DDM #132 took the surveyor to the designated dietary dumpster which was open and had a pile of debris next to the dumpster including cut up onions, leaves and Christmas lights. There was a broken dresser, chair and couch near the dumpster. Observation continued to the right most point of the parking lot where snow plow markers, a box, trash and takeout were all outside of the dumpster. A wooden open gated area near this dumpster contained a red biohazard barrel and a bookshelf. Interview with DDM #132 at the time of observation verified the dumpster area was not reasonably clean and that the biohazardous waste should not have been in the parking lot. 2. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure washing machines hit minimum required temperatures for hot water processing. These findings had the potential to affect all 57 residents within the facility. Findings include: Observation on 04/16/24 starting at 8:13 A.M. revealed the soiled linen laundry room contained three washers. The washers did not have a temperature gauge on them. No temperature logs were observed. On the wall there was a listing of different laundry cycles but this lacked temperature information. Laundry Aide (LA) #139 donned a gown and gloves then started to load linens into the washing machine, breaking open clear bags and putting the items in the drum of the washing machine. When the surveyor inquired about temperatures during the wash cycle, LA #139 placed a yellow plate thermometer into the wash and started the cycle. Interview on 04/16/24 at 7:45 A.M. with Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) #138 revealed the washing machine got to a temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F). HLS #138 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the menu and spreadsheet, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in appropriate quantities. This affected 49 residents receiving food from the kitchen as four residents (#2, #7, #47, #54) were ordered nothing-by-mouth (NPO) and four additional residents (#12, #31, #43 and #56) were scheduled to receive a different entree at the meal as they were on a regular No Added Salt (NAS) diet. Facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of a menu for Week 1, Tuesday for lunch revealed a meal consisting of baked macaroni and cheese, tomatoes [NAME], rosemary dinner roll and fruit cocktail. An alternate was listed as marinated chicken thigh, green beans and mashed potatoes. Review of the diet guide sheet for Tuesday (Day 3) Lunch corresponding to 04/16/24 revealed for the entrée of macaroni and cheese, residents were to receive one cup (eight ounces) of baked macaroni and cheese on a regular, dysphagia advanced (mechanical), dysphagia mechanical and carbohydrate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of property was reported to the State agency. This affected one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Interview with Long Term Care Ombudsman #133 on 04/15/24 at 1:22 P.M. revealed she received a concern that Resident #6's lockbox containing roughly $35.00, a checkbook, and a bank card went missing from her room. The items were noted missing 03/31/24 and it was reported to a facility nurse on 04/01/24. The ombudsman sent an email regarding the issue to the Administrator on 04/06/24 and discussed it with her on 04/12/24. Interview with Resident #6 on 04/17/24 at 8:32 A.M. revealed her lock box containing between twenty and fifty dollars, a check book, and a bank card was taken out of her room. She was unsure how long it was missing. She reported it to management and no one addressed the situation. Record review of the Ohio…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, the facility did not ensure all employees were checked against the nurse aide registry (NAR) and had evidence of Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) checks. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings Include: Review of employee personnel files revealed the following: Review of the personnel file for Dietary Manager (DM) #601, hire date of 01/02/24, revealed no evidence of a check against the nurse aide registry (NAR). Review of the online Ohio NAR for DM #601 revealed no findings for DM #601. Review of the personnel file for Employee #834, hired in December 2023 into the position of nurse, revealed no evidence of a criminal background check. Review of the facility Bureau of Criminal Investigation and Identification Log dated 02/02/24 through 02/29/24 revealed Employee #834 was not listed on the log. Interview on 03/04/24 at 2:15 P.M. with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #600 revealed the current company took over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, review of the activity calendars and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an adequate number and variety of therapeutic activities were being provided to meet the needs and preferences of the residents. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation on 02/27/24 at 9:39 A.M. of the first floor activities bulletin board revealed an empty display with no activity calendar posted. A confidential interview on 02/27/24 at 9:39 A.M. with Employee #813 revealed activities were offered, but there were no activities in the evenings or on the weekends. Interview on 02/27/24 at 9:49 A.M. with Resident #55 revealed the facility only offered bingo and painting. Resident #55 revealed there were no other activities offered. Interview on 02/27/24 at 10:01 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed she did not go to activities because all that facility offered was bingo and she did not like bingo. A confidential interview on 02/27/24 at 10:13 A.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview and review of the facility activity director job description, the facility failed to ensure a qualified professional was in place to act as the activity director and direct the facility's activity program. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Activity Director (AD) #603 revealed a date of hire of 09/15/22 with no date of separation listed. Interview on 02/27/24 at 11:54 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility no longer had an activity director in place. The DON revealed AD #603 recently put in her notice of separation and subsequently went on medical leave shortly after. The DON revealed there was one activity employee who worked whenever they needed her to, including on her off days. The DON revealed the activity employee worked five days a week, full time. Follow-up interview on 02/27/24 at 3:25 P.M. with the DON revealed AD #603's last day worked was approximately in December of 2023. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of a test meal tray, resident interviews, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve hot, palatable, and visibly pleasing foods. This had the potential to affect all residents, except Residents #2, #8, #11, #49, and #60, who were identified by the facility a consuming nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 61. Findings include: Interview on 02/27/24 at 9:49 A.M. with Resident #55 revealed the facility's food was nasty with no alternatives, and the chicken patties were nasty. Interview on 02/27/24 at 10:01 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed the facility's food was nasty, can't eat it or stomach it. My brother orders food for me and has it delivered. The kitchen doesn't follow my preferences Interview on 02/27/24 at 10:24 A.M. with Resident #16 revealed the facility's food was nasty and she was not provided a menu to order alternatives. Interview on 02/27/24 at 11:05 A.M. with Resident #44 revealed the facility's food was served cold. A confidential interview on 02/27/24 at 11:15 A.M. with Employee #834 revealed residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, review of the job description for social services director and staff interview the facility failed to employ a full-time Licensed Social Worker (LSW). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for LSW #602 revealed a date of hire of 09/19/22 with no date of separation listed. Review of an email correspondence on 03/05/24 at 3:52 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator, and Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #600 revealed LSW #602's date of separation was 02/15/24. Interview on 02/27/24 at 11:54 A.M. with the DON revealed the facility no longer had an LSW in place. The DON revealed LSW #602 was no longer employed at the facility and no other LSW was hired in her place. Interview on 02/28/24 at 3:16 P.M. with Human Resources Director (HRD) #701 revealed her date of hire was 02/05/24 and at that time the facility employed an LSW. HRD #701 revealed she was unsure of LSW #602 exact date of separation. Review of the facility document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of a police report, the facility failed to ensure all door locks in the facility kitchen properly worked to maintain a safe and secure environment at all times. This affected all 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of a document titled City of Lyndhurst Police Department (CLPD) Call Summary Report, printed on 02/27/24, revealed on 01/26/24 at 6:57 P.M. the CLPD received a call regarding a suspicious person. Review of the report revealed several supervisors, who were not at the scene, had made calls and reported a suspicious person was running around with a mask and had exited the building prior to the officer's arrival. The officer checked the interior of the facility and left without further incident. Confidential interviews on 02/27/24 from 10:53 A.M. to 12:12 P.M. with Employee #810, #822, #834 and #915 revealed a door in the facility kitchen did not securely lock. Employee #915 revealed the facility was searched by police recently due to an incident involving an unknown,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and sanitary environment in resident rooms affecting 17 Residents (#16, #39, #55, #25, #44, #51, #21, #3, #4, #6, #8, #9, #49, #58, #17, #57 and #56), and failed to maintain the second floor shower room in a safe, clean and sanitary manner which had the potential to affect an additional 21 residents living on the second floor (#1, #2, #5, #7, #10, #11, #13, #14, #18, #19, #22, #23, #24, #27, #28, #29, #30, #33, #38, #40, and #48.). The facility census was 61. Findings include: Interview and observation on 02/27/24 at 10:24 A.M. with Resident #16 revealed she felt her room was dirty and it needed to be painted. Resident #16 revealed she was embarrassed to have visitors due to the uncleanliness of her room. Observation revealed the door to her bathroom had various spots with missing paint, the floors appeared dirty and not mopped, and all four walls of her room had multiple scruffs, smears, and unidentified drip spots. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter drainage bags were covered for privacy and did not eminate a strong odor of urine that could be smelled in the room and into the hallway and therefore traced to Resident #2's room. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, functional quadriplegia, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating cognitive impairment, and Resident #2 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of urine and bowel, and had an indwelling catheter in place. Review of the physician orders dated 02/07/24 revealed Resident #2 had orders in place for foley catheter care every shift, foley catheter bag cover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17's care plan was revised to reflect accurate advanced directives ordered by the physician as decided by the resident representatives. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for accurate care plans. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, and gout. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had cognition impairment. Review of the physician order dated [DATE] revealed an order to have a hospice consultation. Review of the physician order dated [DATE] revealed an order for Do-Not-Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). Review of the Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order form dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had a DNRCC order in place to be effective immediately. Review of the progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure Resident #14 was appropriately supervised by two staff while being transferred using a mechanical lift. This affected one resident (#14) of three residents reviewed for hazard risks. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 10/21/22 with diagnoses including paraplegia, bipolar disorder, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 11/09/23 revealed Resident #14 had a self-care performance deficit related to paraplegia and was at risk for falls with interventions including assist with transfers as needed and assist of two for transferring via hoyer lift (mechanical lift). Interview on 03/04/24 at 5:25 A.M. with Employee #703 revealed there was one nurse and two aides to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, family interview, staff interviews, and review of the facility hospice contract, the facility failed to ensure hospice services were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/02/24 with diagnoses including sepsis, urinary tract infection, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and Resident #43 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the progress note dated 02/07/24 at 1:51 P.M. revealed Resident #43 had a care conference that included the interdisciplinary team and family. Review of the progress note revealed Resident #43…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the urinary cathetar drainage bag for Resident #2 was not sitting uncovered and directly on the floor exposing the bag to a source of contamination and potential infection. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, functional quadriplegia, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating cognitive impairment, and Resident #2 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), was incontinent of urine and bowel, and had an indwelling catheter in place. Review of the physician orders dated 02/07/24 revealed Resident #2 had orders in place for foley catheter care every shift, foley catheter bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directives for Resident #35. This affected one resident (#35) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] from an acute. Diagnoses included acute congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, ulcerative colitis, dementia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Resident #35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was able to verbalize her needs, understood others, made herself understood and had no apparent cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15. Review of the plan of care initiated on [DATE] revealed Resident #35 and her family had chosen a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) status, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-23 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the hospital with information on Resident #115's background and current condition. This affected one resident (#115) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 05/10/23 and a discharge date of 07/18/23. Diagnoses included hypertension, depression, schizophrenia, and seizures. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #115 was not assessed for cognition. She required dependence of one person for toilet use, limited assistance of one person for dressing, and supervision of one person for bed mobility and hygiene. Review of the progress note dated 6/25/23 revealed Resident #115 had a seizure. The nurse practitioner was notified and ordered a transfer to the local emergency department (ED). 911 was called, and the resident was transferred by ambulance to the ED. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-23 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #115's care plan was updated to include accurate information. This affected one resident (#115) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 05/10/23 and a discharge date of 07/18/23. Diagnoses included hypertension, depression, schizophrenia, and seizures. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #115 was not assessed for cognition. She required dependence of one person for toilet use, limited assistance of one person for dressing, and supervision of one person for bed mobility and hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 05/11/23 revealed no evidence the Residents' seizure disorder was included in the care plan. Interview on 11/22/23 at 12:45 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #115's seizure disorder was not addressed in the care plan.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's oxygen was administered as ordered. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for physician's orders. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 02/16/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, obesity, asthma, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and anxiety. Review of the physician's orders for November 2023 revealed Resident #15 was to receive oxygen at two liters per minute continuously. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent on staff for showers, required supervision of one person for bed mobility and eating, and supervision with touch assistance for oral hygiene and toileting. She received oxygen. Review of the care plan dated 09/08/23 revealed Resident #15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were monitored in conjunction with the use of psychotropic medications. This affected one resident (#49) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 10/14/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, dementia, insomnia, and hypertension. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 10/21/23 revealed Resident #49 was cognitively intact. He was independent with oral care, toileting, and hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for November 2023 revealed an order for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 100 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for behaviors. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2023 revealed no evidence behaviors were being tracked for the use of Seroquel. Interview on 11/21/23 at 3:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed behaviors were not being tracked for the use of Seroquel for Resident #49.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike physical environment. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 10/11/23 at 2:38 P.M. revealed a sign on second floor shower room door to clean daily and deep clean on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Interview on 10/11/23 at 5:21 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #804 revealed the shower room on second floor was usually cleaned by STNAs on second shift. STNA #804 indicated they would get cleaning supplies from housekeeping. Interview on 10/12/23 at 6:35 A.M. with Housekeeping Director #810 revealed housekeeping staff cleaned shower rooms daily. Housekeeping Director #810 indicated they had one resident complaining of mold in shower rooms. Housekeeping Director #810 indicated their department does not address mold and the maintenance department would be responsible for mold. Housekeeping Director #810 indicated she posted the signs to let residents know the shower rooms were cleaned daily. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was stabilized and maintained in a manner to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one resident (#3) of one resident reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, kidney failure, end stage renal disease, reduced mobility, depression, anxiety, heart disease, and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/31/23, revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, and extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and personal hygiene. The resident had an indwelling catheter for urine, utilized oxygen, and received dialysis services. Review of current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained for oxygen tubing, by storing nasal cannula's and tubing to prevent contamination and changing oxygen tubing as needed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place prior to administering oxygen. This affected one (#3) of one resident reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, kidney failure, end stage renal disease, reduced mobility, depression, anxiety, heart disease, and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/31/23, revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, and extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and personal hygiene. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of all residents during dining. This finding affected nine residents (Residents #12, #13, #59, #62, #73, #112, #114, #130 and #146) and had the potential to affect all 140 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease and vitamin deficiency. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. According to this assessment, Resident #13 was totally dependent with the assistance of one staff person for eating. Review of the nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was on a regular diet. The resident had no significant weight change. Interview on 02/25/20 2:35 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, test tray, and interview the facility failed to serve food at appropriate and palatable temperatures and taste for Resident #13, #58, #73 and Resident #130. This affected four residents and had the potential to affect all 140 residents residing in the facility receiving meals/food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease and vitamin deficiency. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. According to this assessment, Resident #13 was totally dependent with the assistance of one staff person for eating. Review of the nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was on a regular diet. The resident had no significant weight change. Interview on 02/25/20 2:35 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #62 was treated with dignity/respect after her morning meal. This affected one of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. Findings include: Resident #62 was admitted to this facility on 05/03/17. Her admitting diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, adult failure to thrive and restlessness and agitation. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had severe cognitive impairment and she needed extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and toileting. She needed extensive assistance of one staff for dressing, transfers, and personal hygiene. For eating she needed limited assistance of one staff person to provide guided maneuvering of hands/arms. On 02/27/20 at 9:30 A.M., Resident #62's meal tray had been removed. There was spilled oatmeal laying on the table in front of her. The resident laid her hands on the table in the oatmeal and dozed off to sleep. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34 received timely and appropriate notice of non-coverage when skilled Medicare services ended. This affected one of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's Notice to Medicare Provider Non-coverage (NOMNC) form revealed he was discharged from Medicare skilled nursing coverage on 12/13/19. The resident signed that he received and understood the notice on 12/13/19. Resident #34 remained as a resident in the facility following the discharge from Medicare covered services. There was no evidence found to verify Resident #34 was issued a CMS-10055 form informing them of their financial liability for remaining in the facility after Medicare covered services ended. Interview with Licensed Social Worker #823 on 02/25/20 at 4:04 P.M. confirmed the above findings.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were accurate for Resident #45, Resident #73 and Resident #140. This affected three of 35 residents reviewed for accurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular/rapid heartbeat), altered mental status and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #45's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/06/19 for Humalog (fast acting) insulin, inject six units subcutaneously, three times a day with meals for diabetes and an order dated 09/17/19 for Lantus (long acting) insulin, inject 25 units subcutaneously, every night shift for diabetes. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was received six doses of insulin in the review period. Review of Resident #45's medication administration records (MARS) from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely assistance for Resident #13 and Resident #130, who were dependent on staff to eat meals. This affected two of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance. The facility census was 141. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease and vitamin deficiency. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. According to this assessment, Resident #13 was totally dependent with the assistance of one staff person for eating. Review of the nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was on a regular diet. The resident had no significant weight change. Interview on 02/25/20 2:35 P.M. Resident #13 confirmed the food is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to assess and monitor Resident #73's head laceration (cut). This finding affected one (Resident #73) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder and repeated falls. Review of Resident #73's Fall Occurrence Evaluation dated 02/13/20 indicated the nurse was made aware the resident had a fall and hit his head. Upon assessment, the resident was noted with an open area to the back of his head with bloody red drainage. The resident was alert and in stable condition. Pressure was applied to the cut on Resident #73's head and he was transported to the hospital. He returned to the facility with staples used to close his head laceration. During interview on 02/24/20 at 9:33 A.M. with Resident #73's mother, she pointed out he had staples in the back of his head. She said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's pressure wound care was completed as ordered by the physician. This finding affected one of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) disease with dialysis, hypotension (low blood pressure) and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #31's physician order dated 01/15/20 directed nursing staff to cleanse the right heel pressure ulcer with normal saline, pat dry, apply Santyl ointment (ointment with debriding properties), apply an adaptic dressing and cover with an abdominal dressing and Kerlix wrap daily and as needed. There was also a physician order dated 02/05/20 for nursing staff to cleanse the coccyx pressure ulcer wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply silver alginate (absorbent dressing to promote healing) and cover with a foam dressing daily and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident, resident representative, and Ombudsman were notified in writing of the transfer to the hospital. This affected one resident, (Resident #41) of one resident reviewed for hospital transfers and had the potential to affect 11 additional residents (Residents #4, #64, #179, #186, #187, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, and #193) identified by the facility as having a hospital transfer from 09/01/24 through 02/28/25. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 09/18/24. Resident #41 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] to 10/13/24, 10/23/24 to 10/28/24, 12/03/24 to 12/09/24, 01/07/25 to 01/08/25, 01/21/25 to 01/27/25, and 02/11/25 to 02/19/25. Review of the contact list revealed Resident #41 had a Power of Attorney (POA) for care (Son). Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #179's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22 with diagnoses including Respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, and emphysema. Resident #179 was discharged on 02/21/25. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #179 was alert and orientated to person, place, time and date. The resident was independent with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the progress note dated 02/11/25 at 11:00 P.M. revealed Resident #179 had diminished lung sounds and difficulty breathing. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered to send Resident #179 to the emergency room (ER). Review of the progress note dated 02/21/25 at 10:00 A.M. revealed Resident #179 was unresponsive and sent to the ER for further evaluation. Review of Resident #179 's electronic medical record revealed no evidence that Resident #179 was given a copy of the facility's bed hold policy before or immediately after her transfer to the hospital. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2020-02-27 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the resident's representative were properly notified in writing when a resident was discharged to the hospital in an easily understandable language. This affected four residents (Resident #1, Resident #20, Resident #31, and Resident #146) out of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance and pain. Review of Resident #20's progress note dated 12/05/19 at 9:04 P.M. indicated the resident was hospitalized . Review of Resident #20's progress note dated 12/17/19 at 3:30 P.M. indicated the resident was re-admitted from the hospital. There was no documentation found to indicate Resident #20 or their responsible party was notified of the hospital transfer and the reason for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2020-02-27 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the resident representatives were notified in writing of the facility bed hold policy. This finding affected four residents (Resident #1, Resident #20, Resident #31, and Resident #146) out of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance and pain. Review of Resident #20's progress note dated 12/05/19 at 9:04 P.M. indicated the resident was hospitalized . Review of Resident #20's progress note dated 12/17/19 at 3:30 P.M. indicated the resident was re-admitted from the hospital. There was no documentation found to indicate Resident #20 or their representative were notified of the bed hold policy. Interview on 02/25/20 at 3:55 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #810…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$149,620 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $104,650 — penalty dated 2025-04-07
- $44,970 — penalty dated 2023-09-22
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-14 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMBASSY HEALTHCARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANDLER, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2021 |
| REPCHICK, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366114. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.