Valley View Health Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 58.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of witness statements, review of hospital documents, review of the facility policy for falls, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure residents who required a stand-up lift for transfers were properly and safely transferred per physician order and the plan of care. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #11 was transferred by two state tested nurse aides without the use of a stand-up lift and subsequently fell resulting in bilateral femur fractures. Resident #11 required hospitalization, surgical intervention, and numerous sutures and staples to repair the fractures. This deficient practice affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/18/19. Diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, hospital documentation review, staff interview, review of a personnel file, review of disciplinary action documentation, review of an investigation, policy review, and review of facility initiated corrective action, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and assistance was provided to prevent a resident fall. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #64 was transferred by a mechanical (Hoyer) lift using only one staff member to assist, and subsequently fell, causing a closed right forearm fracture and a facial contusion. This affected one (#64) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Resident #64 was admitted to Hospice services on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician and responsible part regarding a new wound. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 58.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/02/25. Medical diagnoses included aphasia, anemia, weakness, constipation, a pressure ulcer of the sacral region that was unstageable, and a vitamin D deficiency.Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a memory problem with severe impairment. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, was dependent for toileting, and needed substantial assistance for showers and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #1's admission skin assessment completed on 06/03/25 revealed no identified skin impairments to the buttocks or coccyx upon admission. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately and timely identify and provide treatment for pressure ulcers. This affected two residents (#1 and #60) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified three residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #1’s medical record revealed an admission date of 06/02/25. Medical diagnoses included aphasia, anemia, weakness, constipation, a pressure ulcer of the sacral region that was unstageable, and a vitamin D deficiency. Review of Resident #1’s admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a memory problem with severe impairment. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, was dependent for toileting, and needed substantial assistance for showers and personal hygiene. The resident was identified with no pressure ulcers and was at risk for skin breakdown. Review of Resident #1’s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards during incontinence care and a wound dressing change. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care and wound care. The facility census was 58. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/02/25. Medical diagnoses included aphasia, anemia, weakness, constipation, a pressure ulcer of the sacral region that was unstageable, and a vitamin D deficiency.Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a memory problem with severe impairment. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, was dependent for toileting, and needed substantial assistance for showers and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #1's admission skin assessment completed on 06/03/25 revealed no identified skin impairments to the buttocks or coccyx upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of pharmacy medication expiration dates and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure multi-use medications vials were properly dated. This had the potential to affect 56 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Observation on 04/15/25 at 6:36 A.M. of the 300-hall medication storage room, with the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed one, open and undated, multi-use vial of Tuberculin, Purified Protein Derivative diluted/Aplisol, one ml (milliliter) (used for tuberculin testing), approximately three-quarters full. Further observation revealed the vial was dispensed from the pharmacy on 03/25/25 and had an imprinted expiration date of 01/17/26. Concurrent interview with the DON verified the multi-use Tuberculin vial was open and undated and should have been dated with the date it was opened. Review of a pharmacy document titled, Expiration Dates, dated January 2021, revealed the discard date for Tuberculin, Purified Protein Derivative diluted/Aplisol was 30 days after it was opened.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility Infection Tracking - ATB (antibiotic) Log, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents met criteria prior to the initiation of antibiotics. This affected 13 (#5, #7, #14, #17, #26, #34, #38, #48, #50, #942, #943, #944, and #952) of 17 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the facility Infection Tracking- ATB Surveillance Log from 01/01/25 to 04/16/25 revealed the facility utilized McGeer's (set of clinical and laboratory findings used to help identify true infections requiring antibiotic treatment) criteria to determine appropriate antibiotic usage. Further review revealed the following residents were ordered antibiotics without meeting McGeer's criteria for antibiotic use: • Resident #5, with an admission date of 07/29/24, was ordered Ertapenem for a urinary tract infection (UTI) on 03/27/25 and did not meet McGeer's criteria for antibiotic use. • Resident #7, with an admission date of 07/29/24, was ordered Bactrim DS for a UTI on 01/19/25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - assessment to evaluate residents for serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability to prevent unnecessary nursing home admissions and ensure needed services) and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure PASRRs were accurately completed. This affected one (#16) of one resident reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 11/07/24. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of current physician orders revealed Resident #16 had orders for sertraline 150 milligrams (mg) daily (anti-depressant) and trazodone 100 mg at bedtime (anti-depressant). Review of PASRR, completed on 03/27/25, revealed the assessment did not identify Resident #16 had diagnoses of dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, or bipolar disorder. The assessment also did not identify Resident #16 was ordered psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician treatment orders were transcribed into the electronic medical record (EMR). This affected one (#20) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure ulcer skin conditions. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 11/03/22. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/12/25, revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact. Review of a Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note, dated 04/04/25, revealed NP #910 completed a monthly visit assessment. Further review revealed Resident #20 had an all over body rash/contact dermatitis with orders for triamcinolone acetonide 0.1 percent (%) cream and Benadryl as needed (PRN). Review of the current physician orders revealed no order was in place for the triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% cream.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the medical record and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheters were maintained in a manner to prevent the impediment of urinary flow. This affected one (#36) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified six additional residents (#34, #39, #40, #49, #206, and #207) with indwelling urinary catheters. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure follow-up appointments were scheduled with urology for the prevention and treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). This affected one (#5) of two residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 11/28/22. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebrovascular disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, other specified disorders of the male genital organs, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and urinary retention. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods in the walk-in freezer were properly sealed, labeled, and dated. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents identified by the facility as receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Interview and observations of the walk in freezer with Area Director of Food Service (ADFS) #306 on 03/06/23 at 7:17 A.M. in the walk in freezer revealed an open, unsealed, unlabeled bag of chicken breast; an open unsealed, unlabeled, and undated bag of chicken tenders; an open, unsealed, unlabeled, and undated bag of hot dogs covered in frost; an open, unsealed, unlabeled, and undated bag of hamburger patties; an open, unsealed, unlabeled, and undated pizza cookies; and an open, undated package of vegetable blend. ADFS #306 at the time of the observations verified the findings of multiple food items stored in the freezer which were unsealed, unlabeled, and/or undated. Review of the facility policy titled Food Labeling and Dating Policy, dated 01/2023,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a shared glucometer was cleaned and disinfected after each use. This affected Resident #32 and had the potential to affect three other residents (#6, #310, and #311) on the 100 hall who utilized the same glucometer as Resident #32. The facility census was 54. Findings include Medical record review revealed Resident #32 had an admission date of 01/13/23. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two with diabetic nephropathy. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the physician orders dated 02/15/23 revealed Resident #32 received blood sugar monitoring before meals. Observation on 03/08/23 at 8:12 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #396 carried the glucometer to Resident #32's room and placed it directly on the resident's bedside table without a barrier under the glucometer. RN #396 obtained Resident #32's blood sugar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-03-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH