No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadows Of Leipsic

901 East Main Street, Leipsic, OH 45856 · For profit - Corporation · 52 certified beds · (419) 943-2103 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 943-2103 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 14 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
102 Putnam Pkwy · (419) 523-9632 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
138 E Main St · (419) 943-2561 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1755 E Main St · (419) 523-6248 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5 S Orchard Dr · (740) 467-2690 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
318 E Sugar St · (419) 948-0025

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.3%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.8%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.3%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.8%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.381.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.421.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.3%CMS range 55.3–74.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.2–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified71.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.331.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
54.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 41.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-22)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-01)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility's Legionella plan and documentation, staff interviews, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and effective infection control/water management plan to prevent the risk of Legionella. This had the possible affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Plan, updated 08/04/25, revealed Legionella could grow and spread in common areas including sinks, showers, water fountains, standing water on washing tables, spa tub and ice machines. There were no records of flushing of low-flow or dead-leg pipes by the facility. The facility had a written description of the building's water system but failed to have a flow diagram.Interview on 01/22/26 at 2:22 P.M. with the Administrator verified the facility did not document or complete flushes of the dead-leg and low flow areas. The facility did not complete a flow diagram. The Administrator stated their policy said they did not have to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident requests for bed accommodations were honored. This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 44. Findings Include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included fracture of right femur (subsequent encounter) with orthopedic surgery, type I diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, and muscle weakness.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Resident #4 was independent with toilet use, bed mobility, transfer, and required set up assistance with bathing. Resident #4 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #4's care plan revised 01/20/26 revealed supports and interventions for behaviors of hyper fixation on condition bed frame and mattress (12/09/25). Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's bed sheets were clean and sanitary. This affected one (Resident #50) of 21 residents reviewed for clean and homelike environment. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, dementia, and obstructive and reflux uropathy,The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had impaired cognition. Resident #50 was dependent with toileting. Observation on 01/22/26 at 10:07 A.M. of catheter care revealed Resident #50 had a bowel movement at the start of catheter care. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #584 completed incontinence care on Resident #50. There was fecal matter on the lift sheet due to CNA #584 wiping across lift sheet with fecal matter on it. Lift sheet was not changed and the soiled lift sheet remained under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to timely assess and obtain a physician order to treat the resident's wounds. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 44. Findings include:Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/10/23. Diagnoses included heart failure, sepsis, obesity, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, convulsions, depression, type II diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #21's care plan revised 11/30/25 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit, risk for excessive bleeding and bruising related to medications, risk for injury related to seizures, pain, and risk for skin breakdown. Interventions for risk for skin breakdown included weekly skin assessments, keep linens clean and dry, and avoid shearing skin during positioning, turning and transferring. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were provided beard protectors while working in the kitchen. This affected all 39 residents who resided in the facility and received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Observation on 05/30/23 at 8:27 A.M. revealed [NAME] #205 had a full beard and mustache approximately one inch long and was working in the kitchen. The [NAME] was not wearing a beard protector. Interview with [NAME] #205 on 05/30/23 at 8:32 A.M. verified that he did not wear a beard protector while working as they were not provided for staff. Interview with the Director of Food Services on 05/30/23 at 8:35 A.M. revealed the facility did not have beard protectors in stock and she would look into purchasing. Review of the facility policy titled, Hair Restraint, dated 11/30/21 revealed food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, with facility failed to ensure residents received adequate and timely assistance with grooming. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 4, acute kidney failure, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, contracture left and right hand, hypothyroidism, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #1 required total dependence for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 02/13/17 revealed Resident #1 needed support of staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) completion and interventions included to provide assistance for ADLs. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation showing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to apply hand splints as ordered and failed to implement interventions for a resident with bilateral hand contracture's. This affected one (Resident #15) of one resident observed for the use of hand splints. The facility's census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/20/17. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities, and phalanax fracture. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely understood and had impairments of the bilateral upper extremities. Review of Resident #15's most recent care plan revealed interventions to follow physical therapy and occupation therapy orders. Resident #15 was to have rolled up washcloths (one washcloth for each hand) in each palm/hand to decrease tightness and skin breakdown. The resident was to use washcloths when in bed (at night and during any naps during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the meal ticket, review of the menu, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure diets were provided as ordered. This affected one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 4, acute kidney failure, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 08/16/21 revealed interventions in place to follow diet as ordered by physician as protein, sodium, potassium and phosphorous intake may need to be regulated based on kidney function. Review of the dietician progress note dated 05/17/23 revealed Resident #1 continued on a regular, regular/thin diet with double portion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate signage was placed on the door of one Resident (#20) in quarantine status, and failed to ensure one Resident (#13) remained in quarantine status. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/17. The resident had a hospital stay from 04/17/21 through 04/24/21. Observation on 04/26/21 at 11:59 A.M. revealed there was no sign on the resident's door to indicate transmission-based precautions. Interview on 04/26/21 at 12:05 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #401 verified Resident #20 had been on transmission-based precautions due to having a hospital stay and the resident's door did not have signage. Review of facility policy titled COVID-19 Guidelines for Contact/Droplet Precautions, dated 07/29/20, revealed when a resident is on contact/droplet precautions a sign is posted on the resident's door alerting of precautions. 2. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach. This affected one Resident (#23) of 14 observed for call lights. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 11/22/20 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease with heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, history of falling, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #23's care plan dated 05/23/20 revealed Resident #23 had impaired ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) tasks and needed staff support to complete. Resident #23 was at risk for falling related weakness, impaired safety awareness, and use of medication. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #23 had mild cognitive impairment. The resident was noted to require a one person physical assist with bed mobility, extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#15) of one reviewed was provided proper interventions to potentially prevent constipation. The facility's census was 43. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #15 revealed an admission of 11/17/20. Diagnoses included, multiple fractures of ribs, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and constipation. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #15's orders revealed orders for GlycoLax 17 grams, once per day, as needed (PRN) with a start date of 11/17/20, Colace 100 milligrams (mg) two times a day with a start date of 02/12/21, and Miralax 17 grams once per day with a start date of 03/25/21. Review of Resident #15's Bowel and Bladder by Shift Chart revealed from 02/06/21 to 02/11/21 (six days) Resident #15 had no bowel movement documented.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident was free from falls when personal care was provided by one staff member, instead of the required two. This affected one Resident (#10) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/13/20 with diagnoses including, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #10 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and toileting. Interview on 04/26/21 at 11:18 A.M. with Resident #10 revealed she had a fall during incontinence care. Resident #10 revealed a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) rolled her to the side to perform care and she fell out of bed. Resident #10 could not recall the date of when the incident happened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately document an incident/fall in a resident's medical record. This affected one Resident (#10) of one reviewed for accurate documentation. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/13/20 with diagnoses including, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #10 required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and toileting. Review of Resident #10's progress notes for February 2021 and March 2021 revealed no evidence of any documentation of incidents or falls. Interview on 04/26/21 at 11:18 A.M. with Resident #10 revealed a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) rolled her to the side to perform care and she fell out of bed. Resident #10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation., staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper maintenance was completed on a wheelchair being used by one Resident (#16) of one observed. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/20 with diagnoses including unspecified cerebrovascular disease (stroke), heart failure, and history of falling. Observation on 04/27/21 at 11:51 A.M. revealed Resident #16 was sitting in her wheelchair. There were two screws exposed on the right arm rest of the wheelchair protruding through the foam padding. The exposed screws were approximately one inch long. Interview on 04/27/21 at 11:55 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #405 verified Resident #16's wheelchair had exposed protruding screws on the right arm rest of the wheelchair. Review of facility policy titled, Guidelines for General Use of Equipment, dated 08/01/16 revealed, the facility provides and maintains routine equipment for the general use for the resident population.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2021
NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2021
NORTHSTAR HEALTHCARE INCOME OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2021
TRILOGY HOLDINGS NT-HCI, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2021
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
CORBIN, KATHYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/21/2011
FIGHTMASTER, LISAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2015
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2019
BRYANT, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/05/2016
BUFFORD, RANDALLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2019
CONNER, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/03/2021
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/21/2017
MEHAFFEY, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/31/2022
PIETROWSKI, CRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/31/2022
PROSKY, DANNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2015
STREIFF, MATHIEUIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2021
SIEFKER, MADISONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2021

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 10%Other / private 62%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$272per resident / day
operating cost
$8,268per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366252. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next